Comparison of Clinicopathologic and Oncological Outcomes Between Transurethral En Bloc Resection and Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis with Focus on Different Energy Sources

Prospective non-randomized comparison of transurethral laser en bloc resection vs. conventional resection of bladder tumors larger than 3 cm

BACKGROUND

En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) is an established surgical treatment method for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in tumors less than 3 cm. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of ERBT on larger than 3 cm tumors are sparse and its efficacy compared to conventional transurethral resection (TURBT) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laser (Tm-fiber) ERBT and TURBT in patients with primary bladder lesions ≥3 cm.

METHODS

A cohort of 45 patients who underwent surgery for primary NMIBC between February 2018 and March 2022 was collected prospectively. There was no randomization. All procedures were performed by two experienced surgeons. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age >18 years, primary Ta or T1 bladder tumor with a diameter of ≥3 cm, no more than 3 tumors and no history of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Exclusion criteria were carcinoma in situ or invasion into muscle layer (≥T2). ERBT was performed with thulium fiber laser (IPG, Russia). Primary endpoints included efficacy with recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 3, 6 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints were safety parameters, perioperative data and specimen quality (the presence of muscle layer in specimens).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent laser ERBT and 17 conventional TURBT. The location and size of the tumors were comparable in both groups. The success rate was 93.3% in the ERBT group with two cases of conversion from ERBT to TURBT. Detrusor muscle was present in 92.8% patients in the ERBT group versus 70.5% in the TURBT group (P=0.04). Obturator nerve reflex was observed only in the TURBT group: 17.6% vs. 0.0% (P=0.02). The frequency of other complications was comparable between the two groups. RFS was not statistically different between the two methods at 3 (93.9% vs. 94.1%, P=0.87), 6 (89.3% vs. 82.3%, P=0.5) and 12 months (89.3% vs. 70.6%, P=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser ERBT is a feasible and safe procedure to manage bladder tumors larger than 3 cm. While it seems safer than TURBT, its effect on efficacy remains to be assessed in larger trials.

Efficiency of transurethral en-bloc resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

En-Bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) was clinically used to resect non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, discrepancies persist regarding the comparisons between ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and performed manual searches of reference lists to collect and extract data. Data evaluation was carried out using Review Manager 5.4.0, Rx64 4.1.3, and relevant packages.

RESULTS

There were nine eligible meta-analyses and nine eligible RCTs in our study. NMIBC patients undergoing ERBT were significant associated with a lower rate of bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex compared to those receiving cTURBT. Our pooled result indicated that ERBT and cTURBT required similar operation time. Regarding postoperative outcomes, ERBT demonstrated superior performance compared to cTURBT in terms of detrusor muscle presence, catheterization time, and residual tumor. ERBT exhibited a higher rate of three-month recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to those receiving cTURBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). In bipolar subgroup, ERBT had a significant better 12-month RFS than cTURBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Simultaneously, the exclusion of Hybrid Knife data revealed a significant improvement in 12-month RFS associated with ERBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 50%).

CONCLUSION

Using a combination of umbrella review and meta-analysis, we demonstrated that ERBT had better or comparable perioperative outcome and improved 3 and 12 month RFS than cTURBT. We suggest that ERBT maybe a better surgical method for patients with NMIBC compared with cTURBT.

Surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with blue-light cystoscopy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the value of flexible blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) vs flexible white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in the surveillance setting of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

METHODS

All major databases were searched for articles published before May 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome was the accuracy of flexible BLC vs WLC in detecting bladder cancer recurrence among suspicious bladder lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles, comprising 1634 patients, were deemed eligible for the quantitative synthesis. In the meta-analysis focusing on the detection of disease recurrence, there was no difference between flexible BLC and WLC (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.41)]; the risk difference (RD) showed 1% of flexible BLC, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 100. In the subgroup meta-analysis of detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) only, there was again no significant difference between flexible BLC and WLC (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.69), BLC was associated with a RD of 2% (NNT = 50). The positive predictive values for flexible BLC and WLC in detecting all types of recurrence were 72% and 66%, respectively, and for CIS they were 39% and 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance of NMIBC with flexible BLC could detect more suspicious lesions and consequently more tumour recurrences compared to flexible WLC, with a increase in the rate of false positives leading to overtreatment. A total of 100 and 50 flexible BLC procedures would need to be performed to find on additional tumor and CIS recurences, respectively. A risk-stratified strategy for patient selection could be considered when using flexible BLC for the surveillance of NMIBC patients.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of bladder cancer: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group

PURPOSE

To identify laser settings and limits applied by experts during laser vaporization (vapBT) and laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications.

METHODS

After a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, we conducted a survey (57 questions) which was sent to laser experts. The expert selection was based on clinical experience and scientific contribution. Participants were asked for used laser types, typical laser settings during specific scenarios, and preventive measures applied during surgery. Settings for a maximum of 2 different lasers for each scenario were possible. Responses and settings were compared among the reported laser types.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited experts completed the survey. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is the most common laser (57%), followed by Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (48%), continuous wave (cw) Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (26%), and pulsed Tm:YAG (13%). Experts prefer ERBT (91.3%) to vapBT (8.7%); however, relevant limitations such as tumor size, number, and anatomical tumor location exist. Laser settings were generally comparable; however, we could find significant differences between the laser sources for lateral wall ERBT (p = 0.028) and standard ERBT (p = 0.033), with cwTm:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG being operated in higher power modes when compared to TFL and Ho:YAG. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG and short pulse modes for TFL lasers.

CONCLUSION

TFL seems to have replaced Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG. Most laser settings do not differ significantly among laser sources. For experts, continuous flow irrigation is the most commonly applied measure to reduce complications.

Clinical impact of detrusor muscle in en bloc resection for T1 bladder cancer

PURPOSE

Detrusor muscle (DM) in the resected specimen of patients with pT1 bladder cancer (BCa) is a quality-of-care criteria. We aimed to assess whether obtaining adequate DM is dependent on surgeon's experience, whether is a surrogate for resection quality, and whether the degree of DM thickness is related to postoperative outcomes in en bloc resection for bladder tumors (ERBT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 106 pT1 high-grade BCa patients who underwent ERBT at several institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist who assessed the presence or absence of DM and its thickness measured by a micrometer, when present. Early recurrence, defined as pathologically confirmed BCa on repeat resection or tumor recurrence at the first follow-up cystoscopy (within 3 months), was the endpoint reflective of the resection quality.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients, DM was detected in 99 (93%), and the median DM thickness was 1.8 mm. Large tumor size (>30 mm) was associated with adequate DM sampling (>1.8mm) (odds ratio [OR]: 6.10, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.08-17.9, P = 0.001), while surgeon's experience was not. DM presence and DM thickness were both not associated with early recurrence, while positive surgical margin was an independent prognosticator for early recurrence (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.12-10.2, P = 0.031). Excessive DM sampling (>2.1 mm) was associated with prolonged urethral catheterization (OR: 28.8, 95% CI: 3.36-248, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In ERBT, surgeon's experience seems irrelevant to obtain DM. Resection quality relies on surgical margin status, not the degree of DM. Obtaining excessive DM incurs adverse events/unnecessary medical care.

Energy source comparison in en-bloc resection of bladder tumors: subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Different energy sources are employed to perform en-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor (ERBT). No study compared different energy sources in ERBT. The aim is to compare the different ERBT sources in terms of pathological, surgical and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of a prospective randomized trial enrolling patients submitted to ERBT vs conventional TURBT from 03/2018 to 06/2021 (NCT04712201). 180 patients enrolled in ERBT group were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monopolar (m-ERBT), bipolar (b-ERBT) or thulium laser (l-ERBT). Endpoints were the comparison between energies in term of pathological analysis, intra, and post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

49 (35%) m-ERBT, 45 (32.1%) b-ERBT, and 46 (32.9%) l-ERBT were included in final analysis. The rate of detrusor muscle (DM) presence was comparable between the energies used (p = 0.796) or the location of the lesion (p = 0.662). Five (10.2%), 10 (22.2%) and 0 cases of obturator nerve reflex (ONR) were recorded in m-ERBT, b-ERBT and I-ERBT groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Conversion to conventional TURBT was higher for lesions located in the anterior wall/dome/neck (p < 0.001), irrespective from the energy used. The presence of artifact in the pathological specimen was higher for lesions at the posterior wall (p = 0.03) and trigone (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, no difference in staging feasibility among energies was found. Laser energy might be beneficial in lateral wall lesions to avoid ONR. Since there is an increased risk of ERBT conversion to conventional TURBT for lesions of the anterior wall, electrocautery might be preferred over laser to avoid waste of material.

A 10-year renaissance of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT): Are we approaching the peak or is it back to the trough?

BACKGROUND

The number of studies suggesting that en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) is superior to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) management is growing. The aim of this review is to discuss the features of these procedures and to determine the prospects of en bloc in NMIBC management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature search using two databases (Medline and Scopus) and included any research which reported ERBT outcomes.

RESULTS

The lasers with minimal tissue penetration depth are becoming the main tool for ERBT. Unfortunately, most of the systematic reviews continue to be characterized by high heterogeneity. However, recent studies indicate that ERBT may have the edge when it comes to the detrusor muscle rate and the quality of the histological specimen. ERBT may favor in terms of in-field relapse, but its rate in the studies varies greatly. As for out-field relapse-free survival, the data are still lacking. The strongest evidence supports that ERBT is superior to TURBT in complications rate (bladder perforation). ERBT is feasible irrespective to tumor size and location.

CONCLUSIONS

ERBT has gained in momentum with the increasingly widespread use of this kind of laser surgery. The introduction of novel sources (TFL and Thulium:YAG pulsed laser) will definitely affect how the field develops and will result in further improvements in safety and precision. The latest trials make us more certain in our belief that ERBT will be beneficial in terms of histological specimen quality, relapse rate and complications rate.

En Bloc Resection Versus Conventional TURBT for T1HG Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical, oncological, and pathological impact of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) compared with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors (cTURBT) for pT1 high-grade (HG) bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the record of 326 patients (cTURBT: n = 216, ERBT: n = 110) diagnosed with pT1 HG bladder cancer at multiple institutions. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient and tumor demographics. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared. The prognosticators of RFS and PFS were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

After matching, 202 patients (cTURBT: n = 101, ERBT: n = 101) were retained. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes between the two procedures. The 3-year RFS, PFS, and CSS were not different between the two procedures (p = 0.7, 1, and 0.7, respectively). Among patients who underwent repeat transurethral resection (reTUR), the rate of any residue on reTUR was significantly lower in the ERBT group (cTURBT: 36% versus ERBT: 15%, p = 0.029). Adequate sampling of muscularis propria (83% versus 93%, p = 0.029) and diagnostic rates of pT1a/b substaging (90% versus 100%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in ERBT specimen compared with cTURBT specimen. On multivariable analyses, pT1a/b substaging was a prognosticator of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pT1HG bladder cancer, ERBT had similar perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes compared with cTURBT. However, ERBT improves the quality of resection and specimen, yielding less residue on reTUR and yielding superior histopathologic information such as substaging.

En-bloc resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: does it really make a difference?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) followed by pathology investigation of the obtained specimens is the initial step in the management of urinary bladder cancer (UBC). By following the basic principles of oncological surgery, en-bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) aims to overcome the limitations associated with conventional transurethral resection, and to improve the quality of pathological specimens for a better decision making. The current bulk of evidence provides controversial results regarding the superiority of one technique over the other. The aim of this article is to summarize the recent data and provide evidence on this unanswered question.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite heterogeneous and controversial data, ERBT seems to have a better safety profile and deliver higher quality pathologic specimens. However, the recent evidence failed to support the hypothesized oncological potential benefits of ERBT in the initial surgical treatment of patients with UBC.

SUMMARY

ERBT has gained increasing interest globally in the past decade. It continues to represent a promising strategy with a variety of features intended to solve the inherent limitations of TURBT. However, the current quality of evidence does not allow solid conclusions to be drawn about its presumed superiority compared with the conventional technique.

Do we need repeat transurethral resection after en bloc resection for pathological T1 bladder cancer?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR.

RESULTS

A reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features.

CONCLUSIONS

A reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.

Development of a New Two-Arm Transurethral Surgical System for En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Preclinical Study

Backgrounds and Objectives: To overcome the piecemeal nature of bladder tumor resection, en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been introduced. ERBT is difficult for surgeons to perform using the currently available system because it has only one arm. Herein, we aimed to develop a new transurethral surgical system to facilitate two-arm ERBT and to report the results of preclinical experiments using tumor phantoms. Methods: Initially, we aimed to develop a brand-new surgical system for ERBT but, after trial and error, we redirected our development to the creation of three elements: the left arm to grasp the tumor; the right arm to cut the tumor; and the system to operate the arms that can be attached to the existing surgical system (UES-40 SurgMaster^® [Olympus Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan]). The current system was evaluated by performing simulated ERBTs using tumor phantoms made from konjac jelly. Results: Following the assembly of developed arms into the UES-40 SurgMaster, we conducted preliminary ERBTs. After performing several resections, we adopted a basket-shaped forceps as the left arm instead of grasping forceps and an arched electrode as the right arm. The two arms and single endoscope were placed in an equilateral triangle. We performed ERBT for the tumor phantoms that ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 cm without major redo. Conclusion: Herein, we introduced our development for two-arm ERBT. The current concept of "two-hand transurethral surgery" has the potential to be developed in future in vivo and clinical trials.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

OBJECTIVE

To update the ccAFU recommendations for the management of bladder tumours that do not infiltrate the bladder muscle (NBMIC).

METHODS

A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is made after complete full-thickness tumour resection. The use of bladder fluorescence and the indication of a second look (4-6 weeks) help to improve the initial diagnosis. The EORTC score is used to assess the risk of recurrence and/or tumour progression. Through the stratification of patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories, adjuvant treatment can be proposed: intravesical chemotherapy (immediate postoperative, initiation regimen) or BCG (initiation and maintenance regimen) instillations, or even the indication of cystectomy for BCG-resistant patients.

CONCLUSION

Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC.

Role of Macroscopic Image Enhancement in Diagnosis of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Analytical Review

Early diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is of paramount importance to prevent morbidity and mortality due to bladder cancer. Although white light imaging (WLI) cystoscopy has long been considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, it can miss lesions in a substantial percentage of patients and is very likely to miss carcinoma in situ and dysplasia. Tumor margin detection by WLI can be inaccurate. Moreover, WLI could, sometimes, be inadequate in distinguishing inflammation and malignancy. To improve the diagnostic efficacy of cystoscopy, various optical image enhancement modalities have been studied. These image enhancement modalities have been classified as macroscopic, microscopic, or molecular. Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), narrow band imaging (NBI), and Storz image 1 S enhancement (formerly known as SPIES) are macroscopic image enhancement modalities. A relevant search was performed for literature describing macroscopic image enhancement modalities like PDD, NBI, and image 1 S enhancement. The advantages, limitations, and usefulness of each of these in the diagnosis of bladder cancer were studied. Photodynamic diagnosis requires intravesical instillation of a photosensitizing agent and a special blue light cystoscope system. PDD has been shown to be more sensitive than WLI in the detection of bladder cancer. It is superior to WLI in the detection of flat lesions. Bladder tumor resection (TURBT) by PDD results in more complete resection and reduced recurrence rates. PDD-guided TURBT may have some role in reducing the risk of progression. Narrow band imaging provides increased contrast between normal and abnormal tissues based on neovascularization, thereby augmenting WLI. NBI requires a special light source. There is no need for intravesical contrast instillation. NBI is superior to WLI in the detection of bladder cancer. The addition of NBI to WLI improves the detection of flat lesions like carcinoma in situ. NBI is not useful in predicting invasive tumors or grades of tumors. NBI-directed TURBT reduces recurrence rates and recurrence free survival. But its efficacy in retarding progression is unproven. Image 1 S-enhancement utilizes software-based image enhancement modes without the need for a special light source or intravesical contrast instillation. This system provides high-quality images and identifies additional abnormal-looking areas. Another advantage of this system is simultaneous side-by-side visualization of WLI and enhanced image, providing WLI images as the control for comparison. As with PDD, S-enhancement produces a lower rate of a missed bladder cancer diagnosis. The system significantly improves the diagnosis of NMIBC. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of image 1 S enhancement increase with the increase in cancer grade. A negative test by S-enhancement effectively rules out NMIBC. All the image enhancement modalities have proven their utility in improving detection and short-term cancer control. But none of these modalities have proven their utility in delaying progression, or in long-term cancer control. Cancer progression and long-term control are governed by the biological nature of cancer cells. Early detection by optical enhancement may not be of utility in this regard. Well-designed studies are needed to establish the efficacy of these modalities in the evaluation of patients with bladder cancer. The last word, in this regard, is yet to be written.