1
|
Wang N, Zheng Y, Liu J. Performing endometrial cancer surgery using the new single-port robotic laparoscopic surgical system(Shurui). Asian J Surg 2024:S1015-9584(24)01887-6. [PMID: 39261169 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Na Wang
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| | - Ying Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China.
| | - Jianhong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Z, Wang Z, Moschovas MC, Bertolo R, Campi R, Rivas JG, Wei Y, Xia D, Xu B, Zhu Q, Teoh JYC, Gandaglia G, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Patel V, Wang L. Robot-assisted Single-port Radical Prostatectomy with the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP Platforms: Comparison of the Technology, Intraoperative Performance, and Outcomes. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 67:26-37. [PMID: 39113717 PMCID: PMC11304864 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective The purpose-built SHURUI single-port (SP) robotic platform has recently been introduced for several procedures in urology, general surgery, and gynecology. However, comparative evidence on its performance in relation to earlier models such as the da Vinci SP is lacking. Our aim was to compare the step-by-step techniques and 1-yr outcomes for radical prostatectomy (RP) between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP robots. Methods Data were retrieved from two prospectively maintained databases. The SHURUI SP robot was used to perform RP in 34 patients in China (September 2021 to August 2022); the da Vinci SP robot was used to perform 100 consecutive RP cases in the USA (June 2019 to October 2020). A comparative analysis was conducted before and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, body mass index, American Urological Association symptom score, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, biopsy grade group, and D'Amico risk group. Intraoperative performance and short-term oncological and continence outcomes were compared between the groups. Biochemical recurrence was defined as two consecutive postoperative PSA levels >0.2 ng/ml. Continence was defined as full recovery of urinary control without the use of pads. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate continence recovery curves, and a log-rank test for trend was used to detect ordered differences in continence recovery between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP groups after surgery. Key findings and limitations For the matched SHURUI and da Vinci groups, median age (69 vs 69 yr), median PSA (8.4 vs 7.1 ng/ml), and the proportion of patients with low-risk (33.3% vs 29.6%), intermediate-risk (66.7% vs 63%), and high-risk disease (0% vs 7.4%) were comparable (all p > 0.05). All surgeries were successfully accomplished without conversion. A higher percentage of cases in the SHURUI group involved extraperitoneal access (81.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and a pure SP approach (25.9% vs 0%; p = 0.01), while a higher percentage of cases in the da Vinci group had nerve-sparing surgery. The median total operative (215 vs 110 min; p < 0.001) and median console time (162 vs 75 min; p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the SHURUI group. No intraoperative or major postoperative complications were observed in either group. Rates of positive surgical margins (18.5% vs 14.8%; p = 1.0) and extraprostatic extension (14.8% vs 29.6%; p = 0.19) were similar. At median follow-up of 13.5 versus 15.9 mo, none of the patients had experienced biochemical recurrence. At 1 yr after surgery, the continence rate was 96.3% in both groups. Conclusions Despite differences in driving mechanisms between the two SP robotic systems, RP can be performed safely and effectively with the SHURUI RP robot during the initial learning phase, with similar short-term oncological and continence outcomes to those with the da Vinci SP robot. Patient summary We compared two surgical robots (SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP) used to perform robotic surgery to remove the prostate through a single keyhole incision instead of multiple incisions. Our results show comparable technology and similar surgical and short-term cancer control outcomes for the two robots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Marcio Covas Moschovas
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth, Celebration, FL, USA
- University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yong Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Dan Xia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingyi Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Vipul Patel
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth, Celebration, FL, USA
- University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yilmaz M, Karaaslan M, Şirin ME, Polat ME, Aybal HÇ, Toprak T, Tonyali S. Intraoperative workload of the surgeon in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:289. [PMID: 39039389 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02049-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
In the present study, we aimed to systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding the intraoperative workload of surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. A systematic search was carried out in the PubMed-MEDLINE and Web of Science databases through April 2024 using the following search terms: "workload AND robot assisted radical prostatectomy", "workload AND robotic radical prostatectomy", "task load AND robotic radical prostatectomy", "task load AND robot assisted radical prostatectomy" and "NASA-TLX AND robot assisted radical prostatectomy" by combining population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) terms, following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We therefore selected studies that included patients with prostate cancer (P) who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy (I) and reported a workload/task load questionnaire (C) to assess the intraoperative workload/task load of the surgeon performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O). A total of 11 studies were identified. The surgeon's workload during RARP was assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA-TLX) and/or the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX) in the studies. Total NASA-TLX scores of the studies ranged from 22.7 ± 3.2 to 62.0 ± 6.4. Mental and physical demands, flow interruptions, surgeon experience, the use of single or multiple ports, and the relationship between the surgeon and other staff in the operating theater may play a role in the intraoperative workload of the console surgeon. The studies we reviewed suggest that RARP offers an acceptable workload for the console surgeon despite its mental demands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Yilmaz
- Urology, MediClin Kraichgau-Klinik, Fritz-Hagner-Promenade 15, 74906, Bad Rappenau, Germany.
| | - Mustafa Karaaslan
- Department of Urology, Bayindir Healthcare Group Kavaklidere Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Muhammed Emin Polat
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Tuncay Toprak
- Department of Urology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Senol Tonyali
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo Y, Yang Z, Bao D, Wang P, Li M, Wu B, Zheng H, Hu Y. A novel single-port robot for total gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer: A case report (with video). Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13292. [PMID: 38382549 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Multiport robots are now widely used for total gastrectomy for gastric cancer, while there is almost a void of research on whether single-port (SP) robots can be used for total gastrectomy. Here, we report a case of a 75-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by gastroscopy and underwent total gastrectomy assisted by the SHURUI SP robot. We successfully accomplished total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection using the novel SP robotic platform. The patient was discharged from the hospital successfully with no complications during or after the surgery. Pathologic diagnosis showed adenocarcinoma of the gastric mucosa with partial signet-ring cell carcinoma, and no metastasis was found in the 29 cleared lymph nodes. The use of the SHURUI SP robot for total gastrectomy in treating gastric cancer is both technically feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuncheng Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zhangwei Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Dandan Bao
- Department of General Surgery, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Pengwei Wang
- The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Min Li
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bo Wu
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Huachao Zheng
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yiren Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|