Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a pilot study to maximize carrier screening

Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis

Genomic advances have contributed to a proliferation of newborn screening (NBS) programs. Psychosocial consequences of NBS have been identified as risks to these public health initiatives. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review synthesizes findings from 92 evidence-based, peer-reviewed research reports published from 2000 through 2020 regarding psychosocial issues associated with NBS. Results describe parents' knowledge of and attitudes towards NBS, reactions to and understanding of positive NBS results, experiences of communication with health providers, decisions about carrier testing, and future pregnancies. Findings also explain the impact of positive NBS results on parent-child relationships, child development, informing children about carrier status, family burden, quality of life, and disparities. In conclusion, psychosocial consequences of receiving unexpected neonatal screening results and unsolicited genetic information remain significant risks to expansion of NBS. Findings suggest that risks may be mitigated by improved parent NBS education, effective communication, individualized genetic counseling, and anticipatory developmental guidance. Clinicians need to take extra measures to ensure equitable service delivery to marginalized subpopulations. Future investigations should be more inclusive of culturally and socioeconomically diverse families and conducted in low-resource countries. Providing these countries with adequate resources to develop NBS programs is an essential step towards achieving international health equity.

Communication with children about sickle cell disease: A qualitative study of parent experience

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore how parents communicate with children affected by sickle cell disease, a condition associated with social and cultural complexities that pose risks to open parent-child communication.

DESIGN

A contextualist approach informed the qualitative exploration of parent experience using an individual interview design.

METHODS

Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents whose child had a diagnosis of sickle cell disease. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Parental communication was aimed at educating and protecting children from the physical and emotional effects of SCD in an age appropriate way. Parents commonly described avoidant communication and a small number described using this as a more predominant approach. This appeared to relate to fears about SCD, stigma, and uncertainty about how to best to respond.

CONCLUSIONS

As a known mediator of child outcomes, communication offers a promising target for intervention. The findings of this study suggest that parents of children with SCD are likely to benefit from formal support to adapt their communication to their child's needs. Parenting interventions should, in future, include the SCD parent population as a specific group to benefit child outcomes. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Talking openly with children who have genetic conditions is known to promote acceptance and adjustment to illness. Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition that is surrounded by various sociocultural issues that may act as barriers to parent-child communication. For example, it is condition that affects only Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups and is associated with longstanding stigma within BME communities due to the hereditary nature of the disease. What does this study add? It adds a unique focus on communication in the SCD parent population (previous work has tended to study this group alongside parents of various other genetic conditions). The findings provide a rich insight into parent experience of communication with children about SCD. It reveals that many parents find it difficult to talk openly with children and often avoid sensitive issues such as inheritance, physical limitations, and risk of death which has important implications for child coping and adjustment. It is therefore recommended that health care services are designed to support parents with communication about SCD with their child.

A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Purpose

Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) can identify carriers, which is considered a benefit that enables reproductive planning. We examined the reproductive impact of carrier result disclosure from NBS for CF.

Methods

We surveyed mothers of carrier infants after NBS (Time-1) and one-year later (Time-2) to ascertain intended and reported communication of their infants’ carrier results to relatives, carrier testing for themselves/other children and reproductive decisions. A sub-sample of mothers was also interviewed at Time-1 and Time-2.

Results

Response rate was 54%. Just over half (55%) of mothers carrier tested at Time-1; a further 40% of those who intended to test at Time-1 tested at Time-2. Carrier result communication to relatives was high (92%), but a majority of participants did not expect the results to influence family planning (65%). All interviewed mothers valued learning their infants’ carrier results. Some had carrier testing and shared results with family. Others did not use the results or used them in unintended ways.

Conclusion

While mothers valued learning carrier results from NBS, they reported moderate uptake of carrier testing and limited influence on family planning. Our study highlights the secondary nature of the benefit from disclosing carrier results from NBS.

Attitudes of cystic fibrosis patients and parents toward carrier screening and related reproductive issues

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting autosomal recessive disorder affecting ~1 in 2500-4000 Caucasians. As most CF patients have no family history of the disorder, carrier screening for CF has the potential to prospectively identify couples at risk of conceiving an affected child. At-risk couples may consequently choose to act on the provided information and take steps to avoid the birth of a child with CF. Although carrier screening is widely believed to enhance reproductive autonomy of prospective parents, the practice also raises important ethical questions. A written questionnaire was administered to adult patients and parents of children with CF with the aim to explore participants' attitudes toward CF carrier screening and related reproductive issues. The study population was recruited from a CF patient registry in Belgium and comprised 111 participants (64 parents, 47 patients aged 16 or older). We found that more than 80% of all participants were in favor of preconception carrier screening for CF. However, some were concerned over potential negative consequences of population-wide CF carrier screening. Regarding future reproductive intentions, 43% of the participants indicated a desire to have children. Among these, preimplantation genetic diagnosis was found to be the most preferred reproductive option, closely followed by spontaneous pregnancy and prenatal diagnosis. Although the findings of our study suggest that patients and parents of children with CF support a population-based carrier screening program for CF, they also highlight some issues deserving particular attention when implementing such a program.

Informing children of their newborn screening carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of parents' intentions, views and support needs

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease enables the early identification and treatment of affected children, prolonging and enhancing their quality of life. Screening, however, also identifies carriers. There are minimal or no health concerns for carriers. There are, however, potential implications when carriers reach reproductive age, and thus research attention has been given to how best to convey information about these implications in a meaningful, balanced way which does not raise undue anxieties. Most research focuses on the communication from health professional to parent, yet ultimately this information is of greatest significance to the child. This study examines parents' intentions to inform their child of newborn screening carrier results. Semi-structured interviews with 67 family members explored their intentions to inform the child, and related views and support needs. Parents almost unanimously indicated they planned to inform the child themselves. Health professionals were expected, however, to provide guidance on this process either to parents through advice and provision of written materials, or directly to the child. Although parents initially stated that they would convey the result once their child had developed the ability to understand the information, many appeared to focus on discrete life events linked to informed reproductive decision making. The results highlight ways in which health care providers may assist parents, including providing written material suitable for intergenerational communication and ensuring that cascade screening is accessible for those seeking it. Priorities for further research are identified in light of the results.

Evaluation of genetic counseling among cystic fibrosis carriers, Michigan Newborn Screening

OBJECTIVE

A quality improvement (QI) strategy to improve the rate of genetic counseling (GC) services was initiated in cystic fibrosis (CF) care Center E in 2010. This statewide study was conducted to determine: (1) GC rates before and after implementation of the QI strategy at Center E; (2) characteristics associated with not receiving GC; and (3) topic areas addressed during GC.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 1,097 CF carriers born from 2008 to 2011 identified through Michigan's Newborn Screening Program. Rate of GC services was determined for Center E and the other four CF centers before and after the QI change. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine associations between select characteristics and not receiving GC. Topic areas discussed during GC sessions were assessed using frequency tables.

RESULTS

Rate of GC services in Center E increased from 23% in 2008-2010 to 91% in 2011, while at the other centers approximately 92% received GC services across those years. In 2008-2010, being seen at Center E and black race were significantly associated with increased likelihood of not receiving GC services in adjusted analyses. In 2011, neither characteristic was associated with receipt of GC. Of 16 target topic areas, all were discussed in 85% of GC sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a QI strategy of providing sweat test results at the GC appointment within Center E resulted in more CF carriers receiving comprehensive GC services. Center-specific procedure differences should be assessed to increase rate of GC services following a positive CF newborn screen.

To know or not to know, disclosure of a newborn carrier screening test result for cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE

Most newborn screening (NBS) strategies for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) also identify carriers. However, it is unclear if parents want to be informed about their child's carrier status or not.

METHODS

Focus group discussions with pregnant couples to explore their opinions about disclosure of a carrier result for CF of their newborn.

RESULTS

All (n = 30) wanted to be informed when newborn screening would show their newborn being a CF-carrier. Their main reason was the implication of this knowledge for further family planning. Other family members could be informed and children within the family could be tested. Parents stated they have the right to know, but others also expressed that the choice of not being informed should be offered as well.

CONCLUSION

Most parents want to be informed when NBS for CF reveals that their child is a CF-carrier, but the choice of not being informed should also be offered.

Uptake of carrier testing in families after cystic fibrosis diagnosis through newborn screening

Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) provides the opportunity for cascade carrier testing of relatives. Uptake of testing by adult non-parent relatives of children diagnosed with CF through NBS has not been previously described, and this study describes uptake by both parents and adult non-parent relatives in Victoria, Australia. Pedigrees were taken from parents of children who were born in 2000-2004 and diagnosed with CF. A total of 40 families were eligible for the study and 30 (75%) were recruited. In all, 716 non-parent relatives were identified from the pedigrees as eligible for carrier testing, and 82 (adjusted uptake percentage: 11.8%; 95% confidence interval 8.0-15.7) have had carrier testing by March 2009. On average, 2.7 non-parent relatives per family had CF carrier testing after diagnosis through NBS. The odds of being tested were greater for females than males (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.33; P=0.01) and greater for those more closely related to the child with CF (adjusted odds ratio 5.17; 95% confidence interval 2.38-11.24; P<0.001). Most relatives who undergo testing are tested immediately after the baby's diagnosis; however, some testing is undertaken up to 8 years later. These results indicate that in a clinical setting, the diagnosis of a baby with CF by NBS does not lead to carrier testing for the majority of the baby's non-parent relatives. We suggest re-contact with parents to offer cascade carrier testing.

Clinical practice and genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related disorders encompass a disease spectrum from focal male reproductive tract involvement in congenital absence of the vas deferens to multiorgan involvement in classic cystic fibrosis. The reproductive, gastrointestinal, and exocrine manifestations of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator deficiency are correlated with CFTR genotype, whereas the respiratory manifestations that are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis are less predictable. Molecular genetic testing of CFTR has led to new diagnostic strategies and will enable targeting of molecular therapies now in development. Older diagnostic methods that measure sweat chloride and nasal potential difference nonetheless remain important because of their sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen and the genotyping of CFTR alleles are key to newborn screening programs because of low cost. The multiorgan nature of cystic fibrosis leads to a heavy burden of care, thus therapeutic regimens are tailored to the specific manifestations present in each patient. The variability of cystic fibrosis lung disease and the variable expressivity of mild CFTR alleles complicate genetic counseling for this autosomal recessive disorder. Widespread implementation of newborn screening programs among populations with significant cystic fibrosis mutation carrier frequencies is expected to result in increasing demands on genetic counseling resources.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Does newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) improve clinical outcomes, quality of life and survival?

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether newborn screening for CF prevents or reduces irreversible organ damage and improves clinical outcomes, quality of life and survival in people with CF without unacceptable adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.The Group's Trials Register last searched: June 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials, published and unpublished, comparing screening to clinical diagnosis in people with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and quality and independently extracted data. Allocation concealment was unclear in both studies and sequence generation adequate in one.

MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified six trials. Two trials involving 1,124,483 neonates (210 with CF) with a maximum follow up of 17 years were eligible for inclusion. Varying study designs, outcomes reported and summary measures precluded calculation of pooled estimates and only data from one study were analysed. Severe malnutrition was less common among screened participants. Compared with screened participants, the odds ratio of weight below the tenth percentile was 4.12 (95% CI 1.64 to 10.38) and for height was 4.62 (95% CI 1.69 to 12.61) in the control group.At age seven, 88% of screened participants and 75% of controls had lung function parameters within normal limits of at least 89% predicted. At diagnosis chest radiograph scores were significantly better among screened participants; 33% of screened versus 50% of control participants had Wisconsin chest X-ray (WCXR) scores over five (P = 0.097) and 24% of screened versus 45% of control participants had Brasfield chest X-ray (BCXR) scores under 21 (P = 0.042)). Over time, chest radiograph scores were worse in the screened group (WCXR P = 0.017 and BCXR P = 0.041). Results were no longer significant after adjustment for genotype, pancreatic status, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa-culture results. In screened participants colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurred earlier. Estimates suggest diagnosis through screening is less expensive.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Two randomised controlled trials assessing neonatal screening in CF were identified; data from one study were included. Nutritional benefits are apparent. Screening provides potential for better pulmonary outcomes, but confounding factors influenced long-term pulmonary prognosis of people with CF. Screening seems less expensive than traditional diagnosis.

A systematic review of the effects of disclosing carrier results generated through newborn screening

Evidence on the effects of disclosing carrier results identified through newborn screening (NBS) is needed to develop effective strategies for managing these results, and to inform debate about contradictory policies governing genetic testing in minors in the context of NBS relative to clinical care. This is likely to be even more important as technological opportunities for carrier identification through NBS increase. We report the results of a systematic review of evidence related to the generation of carrier results through NBS to summarize what is known about: (1) the outcomes associated with these results; (2) the best strategies for providing information and follow-up care to parents; and (3) the impact they have on reproductive decision-making. Our study expands the existing body of knowledge and identifies gaps in the evidence base. As key players in the management of carrier results clinically, genetic counselors are well positioned to engage in formative research and policy development in this area.

Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening

BACKGROUND

Newborn blood spot screening programmes are designed to detect serious conditions affecting individuals, where early treatment can improve health. It is suggested that screening can improve the experience of diagnosis for parents. For example, without newborn screening, when a child with cystic fibrosis becomes symptomatic a period of uncertainty can arise prior to diagnosis. These potential advantages of screening need to be weighed against potential disadvantages of screening at individual and population levels. Some newborn screening programmes inadvertently identify newborn infants who, although not affected by the condition, carry a gene for it and can pass on that gene to their children; these are 'genetic carriers'. Knowledge of newborn carrier status can lead to: testing of parents and family members, and concern about possible affected future siblings should both parents be identified as carriers; the possibility of such testing revealing the putative father is not the biological father; concern about the child's future reproductive choices; and unjustified anxiety about the health of the carrier newborn. There is an urgent need to develop clear guidance as to how to respond, with advances in technology fuelling the expansion of newborn blood spot screening and raised expectations of informed consent and disclosing test results. Depending on the condition for which screening is offered, options include: employing tests that do not identify carrier status, if available; identifying acceptable ways of disclosing carrier status; or identifying acceptable ways of not disclosing carrier status. These options are illustrated by screening programmes for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis. Currently, there are no screening tests available for sickle cell disorders that do not identify carrier status. For cystic fibrosis, the policy choice is between an extended period of testing, and a screening result that is available sooner for most newborns, but inadvertently identifies carrier babies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the impact of disclosing to parents newborn carrier status inadvertently identified by routine newborn blood spot screening.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for reports addressing disclosing newborn carrier status to parents following newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis in: commercially available electronic databases (October 2002), specialist registers, online journals, online abstracts and conference abstracts. We also scanned the reference lists of included papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies addressing the impact of disclosing carrier status using a soundly controlled trial or randomised controlled trial.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two researchers independently scanned titles and abstracts for relevance using the pre-specified inclusion criteria. Full reports of selected citations were then located and screened again for relevance by two researchers independently. At each stage, results were compared and discrepancies resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no controlled trials about disclosing carrier status.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to develop and evaluate the effects of interventions to support the disclosure of carrier status to parents following newborn screening.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

This review was performed to test the hypothesis that presymptomatic diagnosis, for example by newborn screening, and early treatment may prevent or reduce irreversible organ damage and thereby improve outcome and quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there is evidence that early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis by means of neonatal screening, followed by current treatment, improves survival and long term morbidity, without unacceptable adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Trials Register. Additional studies were identified by one of the reviewers from handsearching conference proceedings not included in the Cochrane Register. Pharmaceutical companies manufacturing screening tests for cystic fibrosis were also contacted to identify any trials of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: January 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or pseudorandomised controlled trials, published and unpublished, comparing screening followed by early treatment to clinical diagnosis and later treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality and two of these reviewers independently extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials involving a total of 1,124,483 neonates met inclusion criteria. A total of 210 patients with cystic fibrosis aged from zero to 11 years with a maximum follow-up of eleven years are included. Concealment of allocation was unclear in both studies. Sequence generation was adequate in one study and unclear in the other. Method to ascertain cases was similar in one study and not similar in the other. An intention-to-screen-analysis was possible in one study, but could not be made due to lack of data and was not performed in the other. Differences in study design, variation in outcomes reported and their summary measures precluded calculation of pooled screening estimates. Only data from one study could be analysed in this review. This study reported a reduced risk of weight and height below the fifth percentile among screened patients (odds ratio control compared with screened group for: weight 6.16, 95% CI 2.44, 15.57 and height 5.03, 95% CI 1.63, 15.63). Adverse effects among parents in the screened and control populations were examined, but it is difficult to assess how meaningful these results are as the timing of the administration of the questionnaire to each group was not clear. Estimation of direct medical costs of screening suggested it was cheaper to diagnose cystic fibrosis by screening rather than other methods. The costing methods used however were not fully described and costs have not been related to effect.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There are few randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of neonatal screening in cystic fibrosis. From the data available at this time, there is little evidence suggesting benefit from screening for cystic fibrosis in the neonatal period, although there is similarly little evidence of harm. This systematic review has identified the need for individual patient data from both included studies. Although we have not been able to perform a meta-analysis, this review provides a summary of all the information currently available from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.