1
|
Lamacki AJ, Spychalska S, Maga T, Balay L, Lugo Santiago N, Hoskins K, Richardson K, Class QA, MacLaughlan David S. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among diverse patients with BRCA mutations at an urban public hospital: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082608. [PMID: 38889943 PMCID: PMC11191783 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the association of socioeconomic demographics with recommendation for and uptake of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (rrBSO) in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. DESIGN Retrospective cohort, semistructured qualitative interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS BRCA1/2 mutation carriers at an urban, public hospital with a racially and socioeconomically diverse population. INTERVENTION None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES The primary outcomes were rate of rrBSO recommendation and completion. Secondary outcomes were sociodemographic variables associated with rrBSO completion. RESULTS The cohort included 167 patients with BRCA1/2 mutations of whom 39% identified as black (n=65), 35% white (n=59) and 19% Hispanic (n=32). Over 95% (n=159) received the recommendation for age-appropriate rrBSO, and 52% (n=87) underwent rrBSO. Women who completed rrBSO were older in univariable analysis (p=0.05), but not in multivariable analysis. Completion of rrBSO was associated with residence in zip codes with lower unemployment and documented recommendation for rrBSO (p<0.05). All subjects who still received care in the health system (n=79) were invited to complete interviews regarding rrBSO decision-making, but only four completed surveys for a response rate of 5.1%. Themes that emerged included menopause, emotional impact and familial support. CONCLUSIONS In this understudied population, genetic counselling and surrogates of financial health were associated with rrBSO uptake, highlighting genetics referrals and addressing social determinants of health as opportunities to improve cancer prevention and reduce health inequities. Our study demonstrates a need for more culturally centred recruiting methods for qualitative research in marginalised communities to ensure adequate representation in the literature regarding rrBSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra J Lamacki
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Division of the Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sandra Spychalska
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Northwestern Medicine Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA
| | - Tara Maga
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lara Balay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicole Lugo Santiago
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Kent Hoskins
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Quetzal A Class
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shannon MacLaughlan David
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stan DL, Kim JO, Schaid DJ, Carlson EE, Kim CA, Sinnwell JP, Couch FJ, Vachon CM, Cooke AL, Goldenberg BA, Pruthi S. Breast Cancer Polygenic-Risk Score Influence on Risk-Reducing Endocrine Therapy Use: Genetic Risk Estimate (GENRE) Trial 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2024; 17:77-84. [PMID: 38154464 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Refinement of breast cancer risk estimates with a polygenic-risk score (PRS) may improve uptake of risk-reducing endocrine therapy (ET). A previous clinical trial assessed the influence of adding a PRS to traditional risk estimates on ET use. We stratified participants according to PRS-refined breast cancer risk and evaluated ET use and ET-related quality of life (QOL) at 1-year (previously reported) and 2-year follow-ups. Of 151 participants, 58 (38.4%) initiated ET, and 22 (14.6%) discontinued ET by 2 years; 42 (27.8%) and 36 (23.8%) participants were using ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, 39% of participants with a lifetime breast cancer risk of 40.1% to 100.0%, 18% with a 20.1% to 40.0% risk, and 16% with a 0.0% to 20.0% risk were taking ET (overall P = 0.01). Moreover, 40% of participants whose breast cancer risk increased by 10% or greater with addition of the PRS to a traditional breast cancer-risk model were taking ET versus 0% whose risk decreased by 10% or greater (P = 0.004). QOL was similar for participants taking or not taking ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, although most who discontinued ET did so because of adverse effects. However, these QOL results may have been skewed by the long interval between QOL surveys and lack of baseline QOL data. PRS-informed breast cancer prevention counseling has a lasting, but waning, effect over time. Additional follow-up studies are needed to address the effect of PRS on ET adherence, ET-related QOL, supplemental breast cancer screening, and other risk-reducing behaviors. PREVENTION RELEVANCE Risk-reducing medications for breast cancer are considerably underused. Informing women at risk with precise and individualized risk assessment tools may substantially affect the incidence of breast cancer. In our study, a risk assessment tool (IBIS-polygenic-risk score) yielded promising results, with 39% of women at highest risk starting preventive medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela L Stan
- Breast Diagnostic Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Julian O Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Daniel J Schaid
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Erin E Carlson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christina A Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jason P Sinnwell
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrew L Cooke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Benjamin A Goldenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sandhya Pruthi
- Breast Diagnostic Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chan LN, Chen LM, Goldman M, Mak JS, Bauer DC, Boscardin J, Schembri M, Bae-Jump V, Friedman S, Jacoby VL. Changes in Bone Density in Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants After Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00006250-990000000-00775. [PMID: 37290104 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on change in bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 34-50 years with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). METHODS The PROSper (Prospective Research of Outcomes after Salpingo-oophorectomy) study is a prospective cohort of women aged 34-50 years with BRCA1 or two germline pathogenic variants that compares health outcomes after RRSO to a non-RRSO control group with ovarian conservation. Women aged 34-50 years, who were planning either RRSO or ovarian conservation, were enrolled for 3 years of follow-up. Spine and total hip BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans obtained at baseline before RRSO or at the time of enrollment for the non-RRSO group, and then at 1 and 3 years of study follow-up. Differences in BMD between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups, as well as the association between hormone use and BMD, were determined by using mixed effects multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS Of 100 PROSper participants, 91 obtained DXA scans (RRSO group: 40; non-RRSO group: 51). Overall, total spine, and hip BMD decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months after RRSO (estimated percent change -3.78%, 95% CI -6.13% to -1.43% for total spine; -2.96%, 95% CI -4.79% to -1.14% for total hip) and at 36 months (estimated percent change -5.71%, 95% CI -8.64% to -2.77% for total spine; -5.19%, 95% CI -7.50% to -2.87% for total hip. In contrast, total spine and hip BMD were not significantly different from baseline for the non-RRSO group. The differences in mean percent change in BMD from baseline between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups were statistically significant at both 12 and 36 months for spine BMD (12-month difference -4.49%, 95% CI -7.67% to -1.31%; 36-month difference -7.06%, 95% CI -11.01% to -3.11%) and at 36 months for total hip BMD (12-month difference -1.83%, 95% CI -4.23% to 0.56%; 36-month difference -5.14%, 95% CI -8.11% to -2.16%). Across the study periods, hormone use was associated with significantly less bone loss at both the spine and hip within the RRSO group compared with no hormone use (P<.001 at both 12 months and 36 months) but did not completely prevent bone loss (estimated percent change from baseline at 36 months -2.79%, 95% CI -5.08% to -0.51% for total spine BMD; -3.93%, 95% CI -7.27% to -0.59% for total hip BMD). CONCLUSION Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 who undergo RRSO before the age of 50 years have greater bone loss after surgery that is clinically significant when compared with those who retain their ovaries. Hormone use mitigates, but does not eliminate, bone loss after RRSO. These results suggest that women who undergo RRSO may benefit from routine screening for BMD changes to identify opportunities for prevention and treatment of bone loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01948609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie N Chan
- School of Medicine, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; the Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Tan A, Munblit D, Oxley S, Khan K, Legood R, Manchanda R. Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051625. [PMID: 36900415 PMCID: PMC10001253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard method of ovarian cancer risk reduction, but the data are conflicting regarding the impact on breast cancer (BC) outcomes. This study aimed to quantify BC risk/mortality in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers after RRSO. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (CRD42018077613) of BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers undergoing RRSO, with the outcomes including primary BC (PBC), contralateral BC (CBC) and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) using a fixed-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses stratified by mutation and menopause status. RESULTS RRSO was not associated with a significant reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.21) or CBC risk (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.65-1.39) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with reduced BC-specific mortality in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.18-0.39). Subgroup analyses showed that RRSO was not associated with a reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.68-1.17) or CBC risk (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.59-1.24) in BRCA1 carriers nor a reduction in the CBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.07-1.74) but was associated with a reduction in the PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41-0.97) and BCSM in BC-affected BRCA1 carriers (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.70). The mean NNT = 20.6 RRSOs to prevent one PBC death in BRCA2 carriers, while 5.6 and 14.2 RRSOs may prevent one BC death in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RRSO was not associated with PBC or CBC risk reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with improved BC survival in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers and a reduced PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alex Tan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
- Care for Long Term Conditions Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
- Solov’ev Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, 43 Ulitsa Donskaya, 115419 Moscow, Russia
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Khalid Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adolph L, Warias A, Stairs J, Collins-McNeil K, Penney L, Kieser K. Hereditary ovarian cancer risk reduction: a retrospective evaluation of patient perspectives and service provision at a regional hereditary gynaecologic cancer clinic 2006-2016. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:263. [PMID: 35768821 PMCID: PMC9245201 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01844-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 have been established in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and result in significantly elevated lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Risk reduction interventions are presently the only effective means of improving survival and specialized counselling clinics have been established as an effective means of aiding this population in navigating complex decisions surrounding these interventions. This study sought to evaluate patient perceptions of a specialized counselling clinic for patients with HBOC Syndrome and referral patterns to this clinic. METHODS We completed a retrospective review of 200 patients with HBOC in Nova Scotia, Canada seen through Maritime Medical Genetics Services between 2006 and 2016. Data were collected on referral pattern to the Hereditary Gynaecologic Risk Reduction Clinic (HGRRC), demographics, health history, and uptake of risk-reducing interventions. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS 156/200(78%) women were referred to HGRCC and 135/156 (85.9%) of those referred attended their appointment. 124/200 (62%) were over age 40 at the time of testing. The mean time from referral to HGRCC appointment was 134.68 days (SD 85.78). 85/135 (63%) underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy following their HGRCC appointment. The questionnaire was completed by 94/188 (50.3%) women. Most participants found information received from genetics clinics (81/94; 91%) and genetic counsellors (87/94; 95%) most helpful in making choices around risk-reduction strategies. 83/94 (88%) participants felt they had sufficient information to make an informed decision. CONCLUSION The majority of women with HBOC in Nova Scotia during the study period were referred to and counselled through HGRRC. Genetic counselling was found most valuable in risk-reduction decision making, which highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team. Patients viewed this clinic as an effective care model to support informed choice about risk-reducing intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Adolph
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Ashley Warias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Stairs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Lynette Penney
- Maritime Medical Genetics, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Division of Medical Genetics, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Katharina Kieser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Dalhousie University, Dickson Building - Room 5007, 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Attitude towards hereditary cancer risk management among women with cancer in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3625-3632. [PMID: 35028717 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06742-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk management intentions prior to genetic counseling predict risk management uptake following genetic testing. Limited studies examined the attitude and understanding towards genetic counseling/testing in underserved countries. The purposes of this study were to explore knowledge and attitude towards genetic counseling, testing, and risk management for breast and ovarian cancer, and to understand the factors influencing risk management intentions in women with cancer in Taiwan. METHODS Cross-sectional with correlational design was used in this study. Participants were enrolled for genetic testing based on clinical criteria suspected of having hereditary cancer. Survey was conducted using a standardized questionnaire including (1) demographics and personal/family history of cancer; (2) prior experience or consideration of genetic testing and reasons for not considering; (3) perception and attitude towards genetic counseling; and (4) intentions for risk management with a hypothetical BRCA1 mutation status. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the predictors of participants' intentions for cancer risk management strategies. RESULTS A total of 430 women with cancer were analyzed in which 51.6% had family history of cancer in first-degree relatives. Only 30.7% had considered genetic testing and 28.4% had known about genetic counseling prior to the study. When prompted with the services of genetic counseling, the attitude towards genetic counseling was fairly positive (score of 19.8 ± 2.9 out of 25). Given hypothetical BRCA1 mutation status, enhanced breast cancer screening with annual breast MRI was much more accepted than cancer risk reducing interventions. More positive attitude towards genetic counseling (each score point increase) was associated with higher odds of intention for breast MRI (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32) and preventive tamoxifen (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.22). Having considered genetic testing prior to the study was associated with higher odds of intention for all four risk management strategies: breast MRI (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.46-6.11), preventive tamoxifen (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.00-3.17), risk-reducing mastectomy (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.13-4.42), and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.27-6.93). CONCLUSION Knowledge of genetic testing and positive attitude towards genetic counseling were associated with increased willingness to consider cancer risk management strategies for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Given the limited knowledge on genetic testing and counseling in the studied population, increasing public awareness of these services may increase adoption of the risk management strategies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Uptake and timing of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:508.e1-508.e10. [PMID: 34171390 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In women with BRCA mutations, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to decrease gynecologic cancer-specific and overall mortality. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients with BRCA mutations undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between the ages of 35 and 40 years for BRCA1 mutation carriers and between the ages of 40 and 45 years for BRCA2 mutation carriers or after childbearing is complete. Currently, uptake and timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and reasons for delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are not well understood. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate uptake and timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations concerning the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and reasons for delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective chart review, we identified women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations who discussed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a provider between 2012 and 2021. Uptake of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was documented, and patients were classified as having timely or delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. For those with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, reasons cited for delay were collected. Comparative statistical analyses were performed to evaluate characteristics of those with timely vs delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations among factors related to timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. RESULTS We identified 638 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers seen between 2012 and 2021. Of these patients, 306 (48.0%) had undergone risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 332 (52.0%) had not. When evaluating the timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 136 (21.3%) underwent timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 239 (37.5%) had delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 263 (41.2%) had not undergone risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy but were younger than the National Comprehensive Cancer Network age guidelines; therefore, they were neither timely nor delayed. Patients with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were significantly older at the time of genetic testing than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (mean, 49.8 vs 36.3 years; P<.001). Of the 306 patients who underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, those with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had a significantly shorter interval between BRCA identification and risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (median, 8.7 vs 17.6 months; P<.001). Patients with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were more likely to have a personal history of cancer than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (49.8% vs 37.5%; P=.028). Of the 239 women with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 188 (78.7%) had delayed BRCA mutation identification, 29 (12.1%) had menopausal concerns, 17 (7.1%) had ongoing cancer treatment, 12 (5.0%) had coordination with breast surgery, 20 (8.4%) had miscellaneous reasons, and 19 (7.9%) had no reason documented. In the multivariate model, older age at BRCA diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78; P<.001) was significantly associated with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy timing; those with BRCA2 mutation type were 7.54 times as likely to have timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy than BRCA1 mutation carriers (odds ratio, 7.54; 95% confidence, 3.70-16.42; P<.001). CONCLUSION Nearly 38% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers undergo or have yet to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy over the recommended National Comprehensive Cancer Network age. The most common reason for the delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was delayed identification of BRCA mutation, noted in 79% of patients with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Timely genetic testing for eligible patients can increase appropriately timed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer and reduction of mortality in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
|
8
|
Uptake and timing of bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:159-167. [PMID: 34652547 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06410-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) often consider risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) due to extremely high risk of breast cancer at early ages. Data on uptake of RRM in LFS are scarce, and are inferred from experience in women with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2, despite differences in cancer risks. This study evaluated RRM uptake in a cohort of women with LFS. METHODS Women (n = 205) with LFS enrolled in NCI's LFS study reported lifetime cancer diagnoses and mastectomies and completed questionnaires regarding reproductive history, cancer worry and risk perceptions. A subset of women participating in an annual cancer screening study received counseling regarding RRM. RESULTS 65% (n = 71) of women diagnosed with presumed unilateral breast cancer (n = 109) underwent contralateral RRM over their lifetime. Nearly half (49%, n = 25) of the women who did not complete contralateral RRM within one year of their breast cancer diagnosis (n = 51) developed contralateral breast cancer (median interval = 6 years). Only 18.5% (n = 15) of women without breast cancer history (n = 81) underwent bilateral RRM. Median age at bilateral RRM of 39 years was sub-optimal for breast cancer risk reduction. Contralateral RRM was associated with early genetic diagnosis, participation in the screening study, and fewer prior cancers. Bilateral RRM uptake was associated with having had children, having breastfed, and high cancer worry. CONCLUSION Uptake of contralateral RRM is high in women with LFS. The frequency of contralateral breast cancer necessitates active discussion of benefits of contralateral RRM and counseling regarding bilateral RRM should be tailored to the early age at risk of breast cancer onset in LFS. There is a need for research into the survival and long-term benefits of RRM in LFS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mittal A, Deo SVS, Gogia A, Batra A, Kumar A, Bhoriwal S, Deb KS, Dhamija E, Thulkar S, Ramprasad VL, Olopade O, Pramanik R. Profile of Pathogenic Mutations and Evaluation of Germline Genetic Testing Criteria in Consecutive Breast Cancer Patients Treated at a North Indian Tertiary Care Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1423-1432. [PMID: 34601666 PMCID: PMC8487333 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10870-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Background The burden of hereditary breast cancer in India is not well defined. Moreover, genetic testing criteria (National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] and Mainstreaming Cancer Genetics [MCG] Plus) have never been validated in the Indian population. Methods All new female breast cancer patients from 1st March 2019 to 28th February 2020 were screened. Those providing informed consent and without previous genetic testing were recruited. Multigene panel testing (107 genes) by next-generation sequencing was performed for all patients. The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations between patients qualifying and not qualifying the testing criteria was compared and their sensitivity was computed. Results Overall, 275 breast cancer patients were screened and 236 patients were included (median age 45 years); 30 patients did not consent and 9 patients previously underwent genetic testing. Thirty-four (14%) women had a positive family history and 35% had triple-negative breast cancer. P/LP mutations were found in 44/236 (18.64%) women; mutations in BRCA1 (22/47, 46.8%) and BRCA2 (9/47, 19.1%) were the most common, with 34% of mutations present in non-BRCA genes. Patients qualifying the testing criteria had a higher risk of having a P/LP mutation (NCCN: 23.6% vs. 7.04%, p = 0.03; MCG plus: 24.8% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.01). The sensitivity of the NCCN criteria was 88.6% (75.4–96.2) and 86.36% (72.65–94.83) for MCG plus. More than 95% sensitivity was achieved if all women up to 60 years of age were tested. Cascade testing was performed in 31 previous (16/44 families), with 23 testing positive. Conclusions The frequency of P/LP mutations in India is high, with significant contribution of non-BRCA genes. Testing criteria need modification to expand access to testing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10870-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhenil Mittal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S V S Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Atul Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Akash Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Bhoriwal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Koushik Sinha Deb
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ekta Dhamija
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Thulkar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Olufunmilayo Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raja Pramanik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rippinger N, Fischer C, Sinn HP, Dikow N, Sutter C, Rhiem K, Grill S, Cremer FW, Nguyen HP, Ditsch N, Kast K, Hettmer S, Kratz CP, Schott S. Breast cancer characteristics and surgery among women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome in Germany-A retrospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7747-7758. [PMID: 34569185 PMCID: PMC8559485 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with Li‐Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) have elevated breast cancer (BC) risk. Optimal BC treatment strategies in this population are yet unknown. Methods BC subtypes and treatment were retrospectively investigated between December 2016 and January 2019 in a multicentre study. BC risks were evaluated according to the type of surgery. Results Thirty‐five women of our study population (35/44; 79.5%) had developed 36 breast lesions at first diagnosis at a mean age of 34 years. Those breast lesions comprised 32 invasive BCs (89%), three ductal carcinoma in situ alone (8%) and one malignant phyllodes tumour (3%). BCs were mainly high‐grade (18/32), of no special type (NST; 31/32), HER2‐enriched (11/32) or luminal‐B‐(like)‐type (10/32). Affected women (n = 35) received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS, n = 17) or a mastectomy (ME, n = 18) including seven women with simultaneous contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at first diagnosis. Nineteen women suffered 20 breast or locoregional axillary lesions at second diagnosis with mean age of 36. Median time between first and second diagnosis was 57 months; median time to contra‐ and ipsilateral recurrence depended on surgical strategies (BCS: 46 vs. unilateral ME: 93 vs. bilateral ME > 140 months). Women with a primary treatment of solitaire therapeutic ME suffered from contralateral BC earlier compared to those with therapeutic ME and CPM (median: 93 vs. >140 months). Conclusion Aggressive BC subtypes occur among women with LFS. Surgical treatment, i.e. ME and CPM, may prolong time to a second BC diagnosis. Conclusion on long‐term survival benefit is pending. Individual competing tumour risks and long‐term outcomes need to be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rippinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Fischer
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC TUM), University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Huu P Nguyen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstretrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Hettmer
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Kratz
- Paediatric Haematology and Oncology and Rare Disease Program, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Uptake of bilateral-risk-reducing-mastectomy: Prospective analysis of 7195 women at high-risk of breast cancer. Breast 2021; 60:45-52. [PMID: 34464846 PMCID: PMC8406355 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bilateral-Risk-Reducing-Mastectomy-(BRRM) is well described in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers. However, little is known about the relative uptake, time trends or factors influencing uptake in those at increased breast cancer risk not known to be carriers. The aim of this study is to assess these factors in both groups. Methods BRRM uptake was assessed from entry to the Manchester Family History Clinic or from date of personal BRCA1/2 test. Follow up was censored at BRRM, breast cancer diagnosis, death or January 01, 2020. Cumulative incidence and cause specific and competing risk regression analyses were used to assess the significance of factors associated with BRRM. Results Of 7195 women at ≥25% lifetime breast cancer risk followed for up to 32 years, 451 (6.2%) underwent pre-symptomatic BRRM. Of those eligible in different risk groups the 20-year uptake of BRRM was 47.7%-(95%CI = 42.4–53.2%) in 479 BRCA1/2 carriers; 9.0% (95%CI = 7.26–11.24%) in 1261 women at ≥40% lifetime risk (non-BRCA), 4.8%-(95%CI = 3.98–5.73%) in 3561 women at 30–39% risk and 2.9%-(95%CI = 2.09–4.09%) in 1783 women at 25–29% lifetime risk. In cause-specific Cox regression analysis death of a sister with breast cancer<50 (OR = 2.4; 95%CI = 1.7–3.4), mother<60 (OR = 1.9; 95%CI = 1.5–2.3), having children (OR = 1.4; 95%CI = 1.1–1.8), breast biopsy (OR = 1.4; 95%CI = 1.0–1.8) were all independently associated with BRRM uptake, while being older at assessment was less likely to be associated with BRRM (>50; OR = 0.26,95%CI = 0.17–0.41). Uptake continued to rise to 20 years from initial risk assessment. Conclusion We have identified several additional factors that correlate with BRRM uptake and demonstrate continued increases over time. These factors will help to tailor counselling and support for women. BRRM continues even 20 years post original breast cancer risk assessment. Potential triggers include death of mother/sister, children and a breast biopsy. Uptake is clearly informed by lifetime risk of BC and higher in younger the women.
Collapse
|
12
|
Nitecki R, Moss HA, Watson CH, Urbauer DL, Melamed A, Lu KH, Lipkin SM, Offit K, Rauh-Hain JA, Frey MK. Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:779-783. [PMID: 33443030 PMCID: PMC8603783 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying mutation-carrying relatives of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes via cascade testing is an underused first step in primary cancer prevention. A feasibility study of facilitated genetic testing of at-risk relatives of patients with a known pathogenic mutation demonstrated encouraging uptake of cascade testing. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of genetic testing of identified first-degree relatives of probands with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation randomized to a facilitated cascade testing strategy versus standard of care, proband-mediated, information sharing. STUDY HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize that facilitated cascade testing will drive significantly higher uptake of genetic testing than the standard of care. TRIAL DESIGN The FaCT (Facilitated Cascade Testing) trial is a prospective multi-institutional randomized study comparing the efficacy of a multicomponent facilitated cascade testing intervention with the standard of care. Patients with a known BRCA1/2 mutation (probands) cared for at participating sites will be randomized. Probands randomized to the standard of care group will be instructed to share a family letter with their first-degree relatives and encourage them to complete genetic testing. First-degree relatives of probands randomized to the intervention arm will receive engagement strategies with a patient navigator, an educational video, and accessible genetic testing services. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Adult participants who are first-degree relatives of a patient with a BRCA1/2 mutation and have not had prior genetic testing will be included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT Analyses will assess the proportion of first-degree relatives identified by the proband who complete genetic testing by 6 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm. SAMPLE SIZE One hundred and fifty probands with a BRCA1/2 mutation will be randomized. Each proband is expected to provide an average of 3 relatives, for an expected 450 participants. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS January 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04613440.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Nitecki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Catherine H Watson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diana L Urbauer
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven M Lipkin
- Departments of Medicine and Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marcinkute R, Woodward ER, Gandhi A, Howell S, Crosbie EJ, Wissely J, Harvey J, Highton L, Murphy J, Holland C, Edmondson R, Clayton R, Barr L, Harkness EF, Howell A, Lalloo F, Evans DG. Uptake and efficacy of bilateral risk reducing surgery in unaffected female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. J Med Genet 2021; 59:133-140. [PMID: 33568438 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women testing positive for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants have high lifetime risks of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer. The effectiveness of risk reducing surgery (RRS) has been demonstrated in numerous previous studies. We evaluated long-term uptake, timing and effectiveness of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in healthy BRCA1/2 carriers. METHODS Women were prospectively followed up from positive genetic test (GT) result to censor date. χ² testing compared categorical variables; Cox regression model estimated HRs and 95% CI for BC/ovarian cancer cases associated with RRS, and impact on all-cause mortality; Kaplan-Meier curves estimated cumulative RRS uptake. The annual cancer incidence was estimated by women-years at risk. RESULTS In total, 887 women were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 6.26 years (range=0.01-24.3; total=4685.4 women-years). RRS was performed in 512 women, 73 before GT. Overall RRM uptake was 57.9% and RRSO uptake was 78.6%. The median time from GT to RRM was 18.4 months, and from GT to RRSO-10.0 months. Annual BC incidence in the study population was 1.28%. Relative BC risk reduction (RRM versus non-RRM) was 94%. Risk reduction of ovarian cancer (RRSO versus non-RRSO) was 100%. CONCLUSION Over a 24-year period, we observed an increasing number of women opting for RRS. We showed that the timing of RRS remains suboptimal, especially in women undergoing RRSO. Both RRM and RRSO showed a significant effect on relevant cancer risk reduction. However, there was no statistically significant RRSO protective effect on BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruta Marcinkute
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Julie Wissely
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - James Harvey
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lindsay Highton
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - John Murphy
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cathrine Holland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Clayton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Lester Barr
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK .,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,NW Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chae S, Kim EK, Jang YR, Lee AS, Kim SK, Suh DH, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB, Kim SW, Kang E. Effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on the quality of life in Korean BRCA mutation carriers. Asian J Surg 2021; 44:1056-1062. [PMID: 33573923 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL), psychosocial status, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms between the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and non-RRSO groups comprising BRCA mutation carriers and to evaluate the effect of timing of RRSO on those aspects. METHODS This cross-sectional study recruited BRCA mutation carriers aged ≥35 years between September 2015 and September 2016. Demographic data of carriers were collected. Outcomes were measured using the questionnaires addressing QOL, anxiety, depression, optimism, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms. RESULTS Of 52 participants, 30 (57.7%) underwent RRSO, whereas 22 (42.3%) did not. In the RRSO group, 16 (53.3%) and 14 (46.7%) women underwent RRSO before and after menopause, respectively. The mean age in the RRSO group was higher than that in the non-RRSO group (49.8 vs. 42.1 years, respectively, p = 0.002). The scores for QOL, anxiety, depression, optimism, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms were similar between both groups. In the multivariate analysis, RRSO uptake was associated with worse physical QOL (coefficient, -5.350; 95% confidence interval, -10.593 to -0.108). With respect to the timing of RRSO, only the mental QOL was significantly lower in the postmenopausal RRSO group than in the premenopausal RRSO group (39.2 vs. 43.7, respectively, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION We could not find any difference in mental QOL, psychosocial status, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups. RRSO uptake only affected worse physical QOL. These results will help physicians counsel BRCA mutation carriers about the effect of RRSO on QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumin Chae
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Ye Rang Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Angela Soeun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Seul Ki Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Kidong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hong No
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Yong-Beom Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daerim St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eunyoung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prophylactic Surgery in the BRCA+ Patient: Do Women Develop Breast Cancer While Waiting? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:702-715. [PMID: 33504079 PMCID: PMC7924380 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers have an increased risk of breast cancer. Mitigation of this risk can be achieved via surveillance or prophylactic mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Those that choose surgery expect to reduce their chance of developing cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of patients developing breast cancer prior to surgery and to identify modifiable contributing factors within the patient journey. This is a historical cohort study of all BRCA mutation carriers identified through the British Columbia Cancer Hereditary Cancer Program between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: surveillance (S) and prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (PM/IBR). The incidence of cancer, time to PM/IBR and patient journeys were analyzed. A total of 333 women were identified. The time to surgery from mutation disclosure was a median of 31 (5.3, 75.7) months. During this period, 6% of patients developed breast cancer compared with a 14% incidence of breast cancer in patients choosing surveillance. The majority of time to surgery was attributed to the period between mutation disclosure and the decision to proceed with surgery. Strategies to facilitate decision-making as well as wait list prioritization and dedicated operative time should be targeted to this population to decrease the number of women developing an interval cancer prior to surgery.
Collapse
|
16
|
Park SY, Kim Y, Kim S. Factors associated with the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING 2020; 26:285-299. [PMID: 36312308 PMCID: PMC9328615 DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.11.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), including the uptake rate and decision timing, among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Methods We found 4,935 relevant studies using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on July 6, 2020. Two authors screened the articles and extracted data. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of articles was conducted using the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies tool. Results Five types of factors were identified (demographic factors, clinical factors, family history of cancer, psychological factors, and objective cancer risk). The specific significant factors were older age, having child(ren), being a BRCA1/2 carrier, mastectomy history, perceived risk for ovarian cancer, and perceived advantages of RRSO, whereas objective cancer risk was not significant. The uptake rate of RRSO was 23.4% to 87.2% (mean, 45.2%) among high-risk women for HBOC. The mean time to decide whether to undergo RRSO after BRCA testing was 4 to 34 months. Conclusion RRSO decisions are affected by demographic, clinical, and psychological factors, rather than objective cancer risk. Nonetheless, women seeking RRSO should be offered information about objective cancer risk. Even though decision-making for RRSO is a complex and multifaceted process, the psychosocial factors that may influence decisions have not been comprehensively examined, including family attitudes toward RRSO, cultural norms, social values, and health care providers’ attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-young Park
- Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youlim Kim
- Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute and College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute and College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Corresponding author: Sue Kim College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2228-3276 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guo XM, Cowan M, Pyrzak A, Shulman L, Barber EL. Impact of a Structured Early Detection Program on Adherence to Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1/2 Carriers. J Gynecol Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2019.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyue M. Guo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Matthew Cowan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Adam Pyrzak
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lee Shulman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emma L. Barber
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Robert Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health in Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Chandrasekaran D, Osman M, Goyal S, Gan C, Izatt L, Tripathi V, Esteban I, McNicol L, Ragupathy K, Crawford R, Evans DG, Legood R, Menon U, Manchanda R. Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study. BJOG 2020; 128:714-726. [PMID: 32803845 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) acceptability and effect of surgical prevention on menopausal sequelae/satisfaction/regret in women at increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk. DESIGN Multicentre, cohort, questionnaire study (IRSCTN:12310993). SETTING United Kingdom (UK). POPULATION UK women without OC ≥18 years, at increased OC risk, with/without previous RRSO, ascertained through specialist familial cancer/genetic clinics and BRCA support groups. METHODS Participants completed a 39-item questionnaire. Baseline characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. Logistic/linear regression models analysed the impact of variables on RRESDO acceptability and health outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES RRESDO acceptability, menopausal sequelae, satisfaction/regret. RESULTS In all, 346 of 683 participants underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Of premenopausal women who had not undergone RRSO, 69.1% (181/262) found it acceptable to participate in a research study offering RRESDO. Premenopausal women concerned about sexual dysfunction were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-7.7, P = 0.025). Women experiencing sexual dysfunction after premenopausal RRSO were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable in retrospect (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 1.2-27.5, P < 0.031). In all, 88.8% (143/161) premenopausal and 95.2% (80/84) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO, respectively, were satisfied with their decision, whereas 9.4% (15/160) premenopausal and 1.2% (1/81) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO regretted their decision. HRT uptake in premenopausal individuals without breast cancer (BC) was 74.1% (80/108). HRT use did not significantly affect satisfaction/regret levels but did reduce symptoms of vaginal dryness (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION Data show high RRESDO acceptability, particularly in women concerned about sexual dysfunction. Although RRSO satisfaction remains high, regret rates are much higher for premenopausal women than for postmenopausal women. HRT use following premenopausal RRSO does not increase satisfaction but does reduce vaginal dryness. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT RRESDO has high acceptability among premenopausal women at increased ovarian cancer risk, particularly those concerned about sexual dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - O Blyuss
- School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - D Chandrasekaran
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Osman
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - S Goyal
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - C Gan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - L Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - V Tripathi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - I Esteban
- Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - L McNicol
- Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | | | - R Crawford
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gaba F, Manchanda R. Systematic review of acceptability, cardiovascular, neurological, bone health and HRT outcomes following risk reducing surgery in BRCA carriers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 65:46-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
20
|
Hao J, Hassen D, Manickam K, Murray MF, Hartzel DN, Hu Y, Liu K, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Lazzeri A, Buchanan A, Sturm A, Snyder SR. Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive BRCA1/2 Result from a Genomic Screening Program. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10010007. [PMID: 32028596 PMCID: PMC7151600 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Population genomic screening has been demonstrated to detect at-risk individuals who would not be clinically identified otherwise. However, there are concerns about the increased utilization of unnecessary services and the associated increase in costs. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) determine whether there is a difference in healthcare utilization and costs following disclosure of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/2 variant via a genomic screening program, and (2) measure the post-disclosure uptake of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-recommended risk management. We retrospectively reviewed electronic health record (EHR) and billing data from a female population of BRCA1/2 P/LP variant carriers without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer enrolled in Geisinger’s MyCode genomic screening program with at least a one-year post-disclosure observation period. We identified 59 women for the study cohort out of 50,726 MyCode participants. We found no statistically significant differences in inpatient and outpatient utilization and average total costs between one-year pre- and one-year post-disclosure periods ($18,821 vs. $19,359, p = 0.76). During the first year post-disclosure, 49.2% of women had a genetic counseling visit, 45.8% had a mammography and 32.2% had an MRI. The uptake of mastectomy and oophorectomy was 3.5% and 11.8%, respectively, and 5% of patients received chemoprevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Hao
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Dina Hassen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Kandamurugu Manickam
- Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Michael F Murray
- Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Dustin N Hartzel
- Phenomic Analytics and Clinical Data Core, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Yirui Hu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Kunpeng Liu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
| | | | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Amanda Lazzeri
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Adam Buchanan
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Amy Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Susan R Snyder
- Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Conley CC, Kasting ML, Augusto BM, Garcia JD, Cragun D, Gonzalez BD, Kim J, Ashing KT, Knott CL, Hughes-Halbert C, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST. Impact of Genetic Testing on Risk-Management Behavior of Black Breast Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal, Observational Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1659-1670. [PMID: 31677107 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07982-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black women are overrepresented among premenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors. These patients warrant genetic testing (GT) followed by risk-reducing behaviors. This study documented patterns and predictors of cancer risk-management behaviors among young black BC survivors after GT. METHODS Black women (n = 143) with a diagnosis of BC at the age of 50 years or younger received GT. At 1 year after GT, participants reported receipt of risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, mammogram, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CA125 test, and transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of BC risk management (risk-reducing mastectomy or breast MRI) and ovarian cancer risk management (risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, CA125 test, or transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound). RESULTS Of the study participants, 16 (11%) were BRCA1/2-positive, 43 (30%) had a variant of uncertain significance, and 84 (59%) were negative. During the 12 months after GT, no women received risk-reducing mastectomy. The majority (93%) received a mammogram, and a smaller proportion received breast MRI (33%), risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (10%), CA125 test (11%), or transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound (34%). Longer time since the BC diagnosis predicted lower likelihood of BC risk management (odds ratio [OR] 0.54). BRCA1/2 carrier status (OR 4.57), greater perceived risk of recurrence (OR 8.03), and more hereditary breast and ovarian cancer knowledge (OR 1.37) predicted greater likelihood of ovarian cancer risk management. CONCLUSIONS Young black BC survivors appropriately received mammograms and ovarian cancer risk management based on their BRCA1/2 test result. However, the low usage of MRI among BRCA1/2 carriers contrasts with national guidelines. Future research should examine barriers to MRI among black BC survivors. Finally, modifiable variables predicting risk management after GT were identified, providing implications for future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Bianca M Augusto
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer D Garcia
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kimlin Tam Ashing
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Knott
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kim J, Park EY, Kim O, Schilder JM, Coffey DM, Cho CH, Bast RC. Cell Origins of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110433. [PMID: 30424539 PMCID: PMC6267333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer, also known as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is the most common and deadliest type of ovarian cancer. HGSC appears to arise from the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. As most HGSC cases present with widespread peritoneal metastases, it is often not clear where HGSC truly originates. Traditionally, the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) was long believed to be the origin of HGSC. Since the late 1990s, the fallopian tube epithelium has emerged as a potential primary origin of HGSC. Particularly, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a noninvasive tumor lesion formed preferentially in the distal fallopian tube epithelium, was proposed as a precursor for HGSC. It was hypothesized that STIC lesions would progress, over time, to malignant and metastatic HGSC, arising from the fallopian tube or after implanting on the ovary or peritoneum. Many clinical studies and several mouse models support the fallopian tube STIC origin of HGSC. Current evidence indicates that STIC may serve as a precursor for HGSC in high-risk women carrying germline BRCA1 or 2 mutations. Yet not all STIC lesions appear to progress to clinical HGSCs, nor would all HGSCs arise from STIC lesions, even in high-risk women. Moreover, the clinical importance of STIC remains less clear in women in the general population, in which 85–90% of all HGSCs arise. Recently, increasing attention has been brought to the possibility that many potential precursor or premalignant lesions, though composed of microscopically—and genetically—cancerous cells, do not advance to malignant tumors or lethal malignancies. Hence, rigorous causal evidence would be crucial to establish that STIC is a bona fide premalignant lesion for metastatic HGSC. While not all STICs may transform into malignant tumors, these lesions are clearly associated with increased risk for HGSC. Identification of the molecular characteristics of STICs that predict their malignant potential and clinical behavior would bolster the clinical importance of STIC. Also, as STIC lesions alone cannot account for all HGSCs, other potential cellular origins of HGSC need to be investigated. The fallopian tube stroma in mice, for instance, has been shown to be capable of giving rise to metastatic HGSC, which faithfully recapitulates the clinical behavior and molecular aspect of human HGSC. Elucidating the precise cell(s) of origin of HGSC will be critical for improving the early detection and prevention of ovarian cancer, ultimately reducing ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeyeon Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Eun Young Park
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Olga Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Jeanne M Schilder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Donna M Coffey
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Chi-Heum Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu 41931, Korea.
| | - Robert C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Inadequate Rates of BRCA Testing with its Negative Consequences for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and their Families: an Overview of the Literature. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:472-483. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
24
|
Lee EG, Kang HJ, Lim MC, Park B, Park SJ, Jung SY, Lee S, Kang HS, Park SY, Park B, Joo J, Han JH, Kong SY, Lee ES. Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers. Cancer Res Treat 2018; 51:280-288. [PMID: 29747489 PMCID: PMC6333981 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2018.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate decision patterns to reduce the risks of BRCArelated breast and gynecologic cancers in carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. We found a change in risk-reducing (RR) management patterns after December 2012, when the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) of Korea began to pay for BRCA testing and riskreducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in pathogenic-variant carriers. Materials and Methods The study group consisted of 992 patients, including 705 with breast cancer (BC), 23 with ovarian cancer (OC), 10 with both, and 254 relatives of high-risk patients who underwent BRCA testing at the National Cancer Center of Korea from January 2008 to December 2016.We analyzed patterns of and factors in RR management. Results Of the 992 patients, 220 (22.2%) were carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. About 92.3% (203/220) had a family history of BC and/or OC,which significantly differed between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (p < 0.001). All 41 male carriers chose surveillance. Of the 179 female carriers, 59 of the 83 carriers (71.1%) with BC and the 39 of 79 unaffected carriers (49.4%) underwent RR management. None of the carriers affected with OC underwent RR management. Of the management types, RRSO had the highest rate (42.5%) of patient choice. The rate of RR surgery was significantly higher after 2013 than before 2013 (46.3% [74/160] vs. 31.6% [6/19], p < 0.001). Conclusion RRSO was the preferred management for carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. The most important factors in treatment choice were NHIS reimbursement and/or the severity of illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Gyeong Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyok Jo Kang
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Park
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - So-Youn Jung
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Seeyoun Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Han-Sung Kang
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Common Cancer Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Boram Park
- Biometrics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Management, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jungnam Joo
- Biometrics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Management, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jai Hong Han
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Kong
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetic Counselling Clinics, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Glassey R, O'Connor M, Ives A, Saunders C, Hardcastle SJ. Influences on decision-making for young women undergoing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:318-323. [PMID: 28870441 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the influences on decision-making of younger women (<35) undergoing or considering bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM). METHODS Qualitative interviews guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) were conducted with forty-six women who had a strong family history of breast cancer (BC) who had either undergone (n=26) or were considering (n=20) BPM. Participants were recruited from Australia and New Zealand (NZ) via hospitals, a genetics clinic, a research cohort, a registry and online. RESULTS Four themes underpinning the influences on decision-making were identified: fear and anxiety, children, personal experiences with BC, health professional's influence. CONCLUSIONS The decision to undergo BPM for younger women (<35) was multifaceted, however, it appeared that fear and anxiety were the main influence. Younger women appear more anxious than previous research with older women. There appears to be few differences between those with confirmed BRCA1/2 mutations and those with no known mutation and this is clinically significant. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings have important practice implications, particularly improving communication of risk statistics, especially to those with no known mutation. Health professionals need to take into account the way younger women perceive information given to them when discussing risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Glassey
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
| | - Moira O'Connor
- WA Centre for Cancer & Palliative Care, School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Angela Ives
- CaPCREU, Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sarah J Hardcastle
- Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Piszczek C, Ma J, Gould CH, Tseng P. Cancer Risk-Reducing Opportunities in Gynecologic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 25:1179-1193. [PMID: 29097232 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This review article discusses cancer risk-reducing opportunities in gynecologic surgery. We cover strategies to reduce ovarian and uterine cancer risk by presenting general practice guidelines and expanding on the literature behind clinical decision points. We address populations of women at increased hereditary risk and those at population risk. We specifically discuss risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, concomitant hysterectomy, opportunistic salpingectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, and hysterectomy. For clinical scenarios in which data are limited or conflicting, we detail the studies on which clinicians' decisions hinge to allow the reader to weigh the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Piszczek
- Division of Women's Services, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Jun Ma
- Divisions of Gynecologic Oncology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| | - Claire H Gould
- Advanced Gynecology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paul Tseng
- Divisions of Gynecologic Oncology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Successful Repatriation of Breast Cancer Surveillance for High-Risk Women to the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 18:282-288. [PMID: 29191429 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since April 2013, the UK's National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) centers have been obliged to provide services for women at the highest risk of breast cancer, including those carrying highly penetrant single gene mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53). Since then, such individuals previously undergoing surveillance in the Royal Marsden Hospital were referred to their local NHSBSP centers. We aimed to assess patient experience of surveillance provided by local NHSBSP services at 1 and 3 years after repatriation. PATIENTS AND METHODS High-risk gene mutation carriers referred to the NHSBSP for breast cancer surveillance were identified from a departmental database in the Cancer Genetics Unit and invited to complete questionnaires about their experience of surveillance under this new pathway, first in 2014 and again in 2016. RESULTS Three hundred forty-six individuals were invited to participate in 2014, of whom 182 responded (53%). A total of 464 patients were invited in 2016, of whom 246 (53%) completed the second questionnaire. Ninety-four percent of patients with residual breast tissue received some screening at the first (n = 161) and second (n = 185) time points. Ninety-one percent of patients (n = 146) received at least recommended surveillance in the year preceding the initial survey, a proportion decreasing slightly by the second time point (n = 164, 87%). Seventeen percent of individuals required additional diagnostic investigations, with cancers detected in 2%. These proportions remained stable between surveys. CONCLUSION Repatriation of high-risk individuals from Royal Marsden Hospital to NHSBSP centers has been successfully accomplished. Most individuals received appropriate recommended annual surveillance. Further improvements are required to ensure equal and timely provision of recommended surveillance.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Women carrying germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. To manage the breast cancer risk women may elect to have breast screening by MRI/mammogram from age 30, to take risk-reducing medication, or to have a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. To manage the tubo-ovarian cancer risk, the only effective strategy is to have a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, recommended by age 40 (BRCA1) or 'around' age 40 (BRCA2). Early studies suggested that uptake of these cancer risk-reducing strategies was low. More recent studies have revealed higher rates of uptake, however it is unclear whether uptake is genuinely improving or whether the higher uptake rates reflect changes in the populations studied. In this study we surveyed 193 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the state of Tasmania to determine the uptake of cancer risk-reducing strategies and what factors might influence women's decisions in relation to both gynaecological and breast surgery. We observed that uptake of risk management strategies varied depending on the strength of the recommendation in the national guidelines. Uptake rates were > 90% for strategies which are strongly recommended, such as breast screening by MRI/mammogram and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and were unaffected by demographic factors such as socio-economic disadvantage and educational achievement. Uptake rates were much lower for strategies which are presented in the guidelines as options for consideration and where patient choice and shared decision making are encouraged, such as prophylactic mastectomy (29%) and chemoprevention (1%) and in the case of prophylactic mastectomy, were influenced by both socio-economic advantage and educational achievement.
Collapse
|
29
|
Cragun D, Weidner A, Lewis C, Bonner D, Kim J, Vadaparampil ST, Pal T. Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2017; 123:2497-2505. [PMID: 28182268 PMCID: PMC5474124 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) disparities may widen with genomic advances. The authors compared non-Hispanic white (NHW), black, and Hispanic BC survivors for 1) cancer risk-management practices among BRCA carriers and 2) provider discussion and receipt of genetic testing. METHODS A population-based sample of NHW, black, and Hispanic women who had been diagnosed with invasive BC at age 50 years or younger from 2009 to 2012 were recruited through the state cancer registry. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare cancer risk-management practices in BRCA carriers and associations of demographic and clinical variables with provider discussion and receipt of testing. RESULTS Of 1622 participants, 159 of 440 (36.1%) black women, 579 of 897 (64.5%) NHW women, 58 of 117 (49.6%) Spanish-speaking Hispanic women, and 116 of 168 (69%) English-speaking Hispanic women underwent BRCA testing, of whom 90 had a pathogenic BRCA mutation identified. Among BRCA carriers, the rates of risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy were significantly lower among black women compared with Hispanic and NHW women after controlling for clinical and demographic variables (P = .025 and P = .008, respectively). Compared with NHW women, discussion of genetic testing with a provider was 16 times less likely among black women (P < .0001) and nearly 2 times less likely among Spanish-speaking Hispanic women (P = .04) after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS The current results suggest that the rates of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are lower among black BRCA carriers compared with their Hispanic and NHW counterparts, which is concerning because benefits from genetic testing arise from cancer risk-management practice options. Furthermore, lower BRCA testing rates among blacks may partially be because of a lower likelihood of provider discussion. Future studies are needed to improve cancer risk identification and management practices across all populations to prevent the widening of disparities. Cancer 2017;123:2497-05. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida
| | - Anne Weidner
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Courtney Lewis
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Devon Bonner
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Tuya Pal
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cragun D, Weidner A, Lewis C, Bonner D, Kim J, Vadaparampil ST, Pal T. Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2017. [PMID: 28182268 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30621.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) disparities may widen with genomic advances. The authors compared non-Hispanic white (NHW), black, and Hispanic BC survivors for 1) cancer risk-management practices among BRCA carriers and 2) provider discussion and receipt of genetic testing. METHODS A population-based sample of NHW, black, and Hispanic women who had been diagnosed with invasive BC at age 50 years or younger from 2009 to 2012 were recruited through the state cancer registry. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare cancer risk-management practices in BRCA carriers and associations of demographic and clinical variables with provider discussion and receipt of testing. RESULTS Of 1622 participants, 159 of 440 (36.1%) black women, 579 of 897 (64.5%) NHW women, 58 of 117 (49.6%) Spanish-speaking Hispanic women, and 116 of 168 (69%) English-speaking Hispanic women underwent BRCA testing, of whom 90 had a pathogenic BRCA mutation identified. Among BRCA carriers, the rates of risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy were significantly lower among black women compared with Hispanic and NHW women after controlling for clinical and demographic variables (P = .025 and P = .008, respectively). Compared with NHW women, discussion of genetic testing with a provider was 16 times less likely among black women (P < .0001) and nearly 2 times less likely among Spanish-speaking Hispanic women (P = .04) after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS The current results suggest that the rates of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are lower among black BRCA carriers compared with their Hispanic and NHW counterparts, which is concerning because benefits from genetic testing arise from cancer risk-management practice options. Furthermore, lower BRCA testing rates among blacks may partially be because of a lower likelihood of provider discussion. Future studies are needed to improve cancer risk identification and management practices across all populations to prevent the widening of disparities. Cancer 2017;123:2497-05. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anne Weidner
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Courtney Lewis
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Devon Bonner
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Tuya Pal
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2017; 17:15-22. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-0001-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
32
|
Drescher CW, Beatty JD, Resta R, Andersen MR, Watabayashi K, Thorpe J, Hawley S, Purkey H, Chubak J, Hanson N, Buist DS, Urban N. The effect of referral for genetic counseling on genetic testing and surgical prevention in women at high risk for ovarian cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2016; 122:3509-3518. [PMID: 27447168 PMCID: PMC5253334 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend genetic counseling and testing for women who have a pedigree suggestive of an inherited susceptibility for ovarian cancer. The authors evaluated the effect of referral to genetic counseling on genetic testing and prophylactic oophorectomy in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS Data from an electronic mammography reporting system identified 12,919 women with a pedigree that included breast cancer, of whom 625 were identified who had a high risk for inherited susceptibility to ovarian cancer using a risk-assessment questionnaire. Of these, 458 women provided informed consent and were randomized 1:1 to intervention consisting of a genetic counseling referral (n = 228) or standard clinical care (n = 230). RESULTS Participants were predominantly aged 45 to 65 years, and 30% and 20% reported a personal history of breast cancer or a family history of ovarian cancer, respectively. Eighty-five percent of women in the intervention group participated in a genetic counseling session. Genetic testing was reported by 74 (33%) and 20 (9%) women in the intervention and control arms (P < .005), respectively. Five women in the intervention arm and 2 in the control arm were identified as germline mutation carriers. Ten women in the intervention arm and 3 in the control arm underwent prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Routine referral of women at high risk for ovarian cancer to genetic counseling promotes genetic testing and prophylactic surgery. The findings from the current randomized controlled trial demonstrate the value of implementing strategies that target women at high risk for ovarian cancer to ensure they are offered access to recommended care. CA Cancer J Clin 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society, Inc. Cancer 2016;122:3509-3518. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles W. Drescher
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - J. David Beatty
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Robert Resta
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - M Robyn Andersen
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Kate Watabayashi
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Thorpe
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah Hawley
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Hannah Purkey
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Nancy Hanson
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Diana S.M. Buist
- Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Nicole Urban
- Translational Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Driel CMG, Oosterwijk JC, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, van Asperen CJ, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, de Vries J, Mourits MJE, Henneman L, Timmermans DRM, de Bock GH. Psychological factors associated with the intention to choose for risk-reducing mastectomy in family cancer clinic attendees. Breast 2016; 30:66-72. [PMID: 27639031 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Revised: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Women seeking counseling because of familial breast cancer occurrence face difficult decisions, such as whether and when to opt for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in case of BRCA1/2 mutation. Only limited research has been done to identify the psychological factors associated with the decision for RRM. This study investigated which psychological factors are related to the intention to choose for RRM. MATERIALS & METHODS A cohort of 486 cancer-unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer completed the following questionnaires prior to genetic counseling: the Cancer Worry Scale, Positive And Negative Affect Scale, Perceived Personal Control Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and State Anxiety Scale and questions regarding socio-demographic characteristics, family history, risk perception and RRM intention. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relation between psychological factors and women's intention to choose for RRM. RESULTS Factors associated with RRM intention were high positive affect (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.12-3.08), high negative affect (OR = 2.52, 95%CI = 1.44-4.43), high cancer worry (OR = 1.65, 95%CI = 1.00-2.72), high perceived personal control (OR = 3.58, 95%CI = 2.18-5.89), high risk-perception (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.15-2.95) and having children (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 1.21-3.50). CONCLUSION Negative and positive affects play an important role in the intention for RRM. Furthermore, perceived personal control over the situation is associated with an intention for RRM. In addition to focusing on accurate risk communication, counseling should pay attention to the influence of perceived control and emotions to facilitate decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M G van Driel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E J Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I A Zeijlmans van Emmichoven
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vries
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J E Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D R M Timmermans
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van der Aa JE, Hoogendam JP, Butter ESF, Ausems MGEM, Verheijen RHM, Zweemer RP. The effect of personal medical history and family history of cancer on the uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Fam Cancer 2016; 14:539-44. [PMID: 26264902 PMCID: PMC4630248 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9827-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Women with an increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer are advised to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to reduce risk of adnexal cancer. We investigated the uptake of RRSO and evaluated the influence of personal medical history of (breast) cancer, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer on the RRSO decision. This single center retrospective observational cohort study was performed in a tertiary multidisciplinary clinic for hereditary cancer of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Women ≥35 years old with an estimated lifetime risk of ovarian cancer ≥10%, who had completed childbearing, were eligible for RRSO. Uptake and timing of RRSO were analyzed. Influence of personal medical history and family history on RRSO decision making, were evaluated with logistic regression. The study population consisted of 218 women (45.0% BRCA1 mutation carrier, 28.0% BRCA2 mutation carrier, 27.0% with familial susceptibility) with 87.2% RRSO uptake. The median age at RRSO was 44.5 (range 28-73) years. Of the women undergoing RRSO, 78.3% needed ≤3 consultations to reach this decision. Multivariable analysis showed a significant difference in RRSO uptake for women with a history of RRM [OR 3.66 95% CI (1.12-11.98)], but no significant difference in women with a history of breast cancer [OR 1.38 95% CI (0.50-3.79)], nor with a family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer [OR 1.10 95% CI (0.44-2.76)]. We conclude that RRSO counseling, without the alternative of screening, is effective. The uptake is increased in women with a history of RRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E van der Aa
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Els S F Butter
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - René H M Verheijen
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Harmsen MG, Arts-de Jong M, Horstik K, Manders P, Massuger LFAG, Hermens RPMG, Hoogerbrugge N, Woldringh GH, de Hullu JA. Very high uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A single-center experience. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:113-119. [PMID: 27430397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Revised: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the only effective surgical strategy to reduce the increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Given the long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause, we need insight in uptake and timing of RRSO to guide us in improving healthcare. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers diagnosed and counseled at the multidisciplinary Family Cancer Clinic of the Radboud university medical center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 1999 and 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze uptake and timing of RRSO. RESULTS Data of 580 BRCA1/2 were analyzed. The uptake of RRSO among mutation carriers who are currently above the upper limit of the recommended age for RRSO, is 98.5% and 97.5% for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. The vast majority undergoes RRSO ≤40 (BRCA1) or ≤45 (BRCA2) years of age, provided that mutation status is known by that age: 90.8% and 97.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of RRSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who were counseled at our Family Cancer Clinic is extremely high. High uptake might be largely attributed to the directive and uniform way of counseling by professionals at our Family Cancer Clinic. Given the fact that RRSO is often undergone at premenopausal age in our population, future research should focus on minimizing long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause either by optimization of hormone replacement therapy or by investigating alternative strategies to RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M Arts-de Jong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - K Horstik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P Manders
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - N Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G H Woldringh
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wevers MR, Schmidt MK, Engelhardt EG, Verhoef S, Hooning MJ, Kriege M, Seynaeve C, Collée M, van Asperen CJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Koppert LB, Witkamp AJ, Rutgers EJT, Aaronson NK, Rookus MA, Ausems MGEM. Timing of risk reducing mastectomy in breast cancer patients carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation: retrospective data from the Dutch HEBON study. Fam Cancer 2016; 14:355-63. [PMID: 25700605 PMCID: PMC4559099 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9788-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
It is expected that rapid genetic counseling and testing (RGCT) will lead to increasing numbers of breast cancer (BC) patients knowing their BRCA1/2 carrier status before primary surgery. Considering the potential impact of knowing one’s status on uptake and timing of risk-reducing contralateral mastectomy (RRCM), we aimed to evaluate trends over time in RRCM, and differences between carriers identified either before (predictively) or after (diagnostically) diagnosis. We collected data from female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers diagnosed with BC between 1995 and 2009 from four Dutch university hospitals. We compared the timing of genetic testing and RRCM in relation to diagnosis in 1995–2000 versus 2001–2009 for all patients, and predictively and diagnostically tested patients separately. Of 287 patients, 219 (76 %) had a diagnostic BRCA1/2 test. In this cohort, the median time from diagnosis to DNA testing decreased from 28 months for those diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 to 14 months for those diagnosed between 2001 and 2009 (p < 0.001). Similarly, over time women in this cohort underwent RRCM sooner after diagnosis (median of 77 vs. 27 months, p = 0.05). Predictively tested women who subsequently developed BC underwent an immediate RRCM significantly more often than women who had a diagnostic test (21/61, 34 %, vs. 13/170, 7.6 %, p < 0.001). Knowledge of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation when diagnosed with BC influenced decisions concerning primary surgery. Additionally, in more recent years, women who had not undergone predictive testing were more likely to undergo diagnostic DNA testing and RRCM sooner after diagnosis. This suggests the need for RGCT to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Wevers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Flippo-Morton T, Walsh K, Chambers K, Amacker-North L, White B, Sarantou T, Boselli DM, White RL. Surgical Decision Making in the BRCA-Positive Population: Institutional Experience and Comparison with Recent Literature. Breast J 2015; 22:35-44. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Flippo-Morton
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Kendall Walsh
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Karinn Chambers
- Department of Surgery; Cornerstone Breast Care; High Point North Carolina
| | - Lisa Amacker-North
- Clinical Genetics Program; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Brook White
- Clinical Genetics Program; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Terry Sarantou
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Danielle M. Boselli
- Department of Cancer Biostatistics; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas HealthCare System; Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Richard L. White
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Levine Cancer Institute; Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shigehiro M, Kita M, Takeuchi S, Ashihara Y, Arai M, Okamura H. Study on the psychosocial aspects of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Japan: a preliminary report. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 46:254-9. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
39
|
Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among female BRCA mutation carriers: experience at the National Cancer Center of Korea. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015; 142:333-40. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2051-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
40
|
Abstract
As the testing criteria for BRCA expand, we are identifying a greater number of young women at significant risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Fortunately, there is strong evidence to support risk reduction from mastectomy and oophorectomy. However, these surgeries come with significant psychological and physical health consequences. For breast cancer, screening with mammogram and magnetic resonance imaging may be a reasonable approach for a woman who does not desire surgery. However, there is no evidence to suggest any efficacy in screening for ovarian cancer, and women electing to not undergo surgery must have a detailed discussion with their physician regarding the risks and benefits of different management strategies. As more women are electing to undergo surgical risk reduction, providers must also be able to counsel and care for these women who will face unique health challenges after surgical menopause at a young age. A review of the current evidence behind management of the BRCA woman follows, with a focus on areas of controversy and current research.
Collapse
|
41
|
Harmsen MG, Hermens RPMG, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N, de Hullu JA. How medical choices influence quality of life of women carrying a BRCA mutation. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 96:555-68. [PMID: 26299336 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Revised: 05/19/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were discovered twenty years ago. Female BRCA mutation carriers have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer at a relatively young age. Several choices have to be made with respect to cancer risk management, and consequences of these choices may affect quality of life. A review of the literature was performed to evaluate quality of life in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers and the influence of these medical choices. Overall, general quality of life appears not to be permanently affected in BRCA mutation carriers or by their choices. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and its subsequent premature menopause affect (menopause specific) quality of life most. Hormone replacement therapy does not fully alleviate climacteric symptoms and therefore, there is a strong need for alternative strategies to reduce ovarian cancer risk and/or for improvements in postoperative care. Future research should focus on these needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Euhus DM. Risk-reducing mastectomy for BRCA gene mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:2807-9. [PMID: 25821000 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4537-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
43
|
Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MGEM, Collée JM, van Doorn HC, Gomez Garcia EB, Kets CM, van Leeuwen FE, Meijers-Heijboer HEJ, Mourits MJE, van Os TAM, Vasen HFA, Verhoef S, Rookus MA, Hooning MJ. Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv033. [PMID: 25788320 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported a breast cancer (BC) risk reduction of approximately 50% after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but may have been subject to several types of bias. The purpose of this nationwide cohort study was to assess potential bias in the estimated BC risk reduction after RRSO. METHODS We selected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from an ongoing nationwide cohort study on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the Netherlands (HEBON). First, we replicated the analytical methods as previously applied in four major studies on BC risk after RRSO. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios and conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios. Secondly, we analyzed the data in a revised design in order to further minimize bias using an extended Cox model with RRSO as a time-dependent variable to calculate the hazard ratio. The most important differences between our approach and those of previous studies were the requirement of no history of cancer at the date of DNA diagnosis and the inclusion of person-time preceding RRSO. RESULTS Applying the four previously described analytical methods and the data of 551 to 934 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a median follow-up of 2.7 to 4.6 years, the odds ratio was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35 to 1.08), and the hazard ratios were 0.36 (95% CI = 0.25 to 0.53), 0.62 (95% CI = 0.39 to 0.99), and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.33 to 0.71), being similar to earlier findings. For the revised analysis, we included 822 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. After a median follow-up period of 3.2 years, we obtained a hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% CI = 0.67 to 1.77). CONCLUSION In previous studies, BC risk reduction after RRSO in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers may have been overestimated because of bias. Using a design that maximally eliminated bias, we found no evidence for a protective effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - C J van Asperen
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - M G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - J M Collée
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - H C van Doorn
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - E B Gomez Garcia
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - C M Kets
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - F E van Leeuwen
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - H E J Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - M J E Mourits
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - T A M van Os
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - H F A Vasen
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - S Verhoef
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - M A Rookus
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | - M J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology (BAMHG, CS, MJH), Department of Clinical Genetics (JMC), and Department of Gynecology (HCvD), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University MC, Leiden, the Netherlands (CJvA); Department of Clinical Genetics, University MC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MGEMA); Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University MC, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EBGG); Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen MC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMK); Department of Epidemiology (FEvL, MAR), and Department of Clinical Genetics (SV), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University MC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMH); Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HEJMJ, TAMvO); Department of Gynecology, University MC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (MJEM); Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, the Netherlands (HFAV)
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Patients' and professionals' perspectives. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136:305-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2014] [Revised: 12/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
45
|
Witt J, Elwyn G, Wood F, Rogers MT, Menon U, Brain K. Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2014; 97:200-210. [PMID: 25064250 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Revised: 06/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework can be adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision: risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search to identify issues important to women during deliberations about RRSO. Three focus groups with patients (most were pre-menopausal and untested for genetic mutations) and 11 interviews with health professionals were conducted to determine which issues mattered in the UK context. Data were used to adapt the generic CODE framework. RESULTS The literature search yielded 49 relevant studies, which highlighted various issues and coping options important during deliberations, including mutation status, risks of surgery, family obligations, physician recommendation, peer support and reliable information sources. Consultations with UK stakeholders confirmed most of these factors as pertinent influences on deliberations. Questions in the generic framework were adapted to reflect the issues and coping options identified. CONCLUSIONS The generic CODE framework was readily adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision, showing that deliberations and coping are linked during deliberations about RRSO. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Adapted versions of the CODE framework may be used to develop tailored decision support methods and materials in order to improve patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Witt
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Fiona Wood
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Brain
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chai X, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, Garber JE, Neuhausen SL, Matloff E, Eeles R, Tung N, Weitzel JN, Couch FJ, Hulick PJ, Ganz PA, Daly MB, Olopade OI, Tomlinson G, Blum JL, Domchek SM, Chen J, Rebecck TR. Use of risk-reducing surgeries in a prospective cohort of 1,499 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148:397-406. [PMID: 25311111 PMCID: PMC4224991 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3134-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Inherited mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) confer very high risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Genetic testing and counseling can reduce risk and death from these cancers if appropriate preventive strategies are applied, including risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) or risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). However, some women who might benefit from these interventions do not take full advantage of them. We evaluated RRSO and RRM use in a prospective cohort of 1,499 women with inherited BRCA1/2 mutations from 20 centers who enrolled in the study without prior cancer or RRSO or RRM and were followed forward for the occurrence of these events. We estimated the age-specific usage of RRSO/RRM in this cohort using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Use of RRSO was 45% for BRCA1 and 34% for BRCA2 by age 40, and 86% for BRCA1 and 71% for BRCA2 by age 50. RRM usage was estimated to be 46% by age 70 in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. BRCA1 mutation carriers underwent RRSO more frequently than BRCA2 mutation carriers overall, but the uptake of RRSO in BRCA2 was similar after mutation testing and in women born since 1960. RRM uptake was similar for both BRCA1 and BRCA2. Childbearing influenced the use of RRSO and RRM in both BRCA1 and BRCA2. Uptake of RRSO is high, but some women are still diagnosed with ovarian cancer before undergoing RRSO. This suggests that research is needed to understand the optimal timing of RRSO to maximize risk reduction and limit potential adverse consequences of RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinglei Chai
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
| | - Tara M. Friebel
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
- Basser Center for BRCA and Abramson Cancer Center
| | | | - D. Gareth Evans
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, MAHSC, St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Rosalind Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research & Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London & Sutton
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Peter J. Hulick
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL and The university of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Gail Tomlinson
- University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA and Abramson Cancer Center
- Department of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
| | - Timothy R. Rebecck
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
- Basser Center for BRCA and Abramson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BRCA mutation carriers have a life-long breast cancer risk between 55 and 85% and a high risk of developing breast cancer at a very young age, depending on the type of mutation. The risk of developing contralateral breast cancer after a first breast cancer is elevated up to 65%, especially in case of BRCA1 mutation and young age at the first breast cancer. Since bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a risk reduction of 90-95% of developing primary or contralateral breast cancer, this option is a key point within the counseling process for patient information and shared decision-making of mutation carriers. Although the local control after breast-conserving therapy in mutation carriers seems to be comparable to that of sporadic breast cancer patients, individual patient information and counseling should include all alternative procedures of oncologically adequate mastectomy techniques and immediate reconstruction. Excellent cosmetic results, high levels of life quality, and good patient acceptance can be achieved with the recent developments in reconstructive surgery of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Garcia C, Lyon L, Littell RD, Powell CB. Comparison of risk management strategies between women testing positive for a BRCA variant of unknown significance and women with known BRCA deleterious mutations. Genet Med 2014; 16:896-902. [PMID: 24854227 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this article is to describe cancer risk-reducing behaviors of women with BRCA variants of unknown significance. METHODS A retrospective chart review from 1995 to 2012 identified women with BRCA mutations in a northern California community system. Exclusion criteria included loss of membership/death within 1 year of testing, prior ovarian cancer, or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Primary outcomes were rate of risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. RESULTS The mean age of the 69 variant of unknown significance carriers was 50 vs. 47 years for the 305 women with a deleterious mutation. Women with a variant of unknown significance were followed for a median of 69 months. Among women with a variant of unknown significance, 30% underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and 11% underwent risk-reducing mastectomy, as compared with 74 and 44%, respectively, for women with a deleterious mutation. Women with a deleterious mutation were more likely to undergo surveillance in the first year after testing. The odds ratios are as follows: 2.1 for mammogram, 6.0 for magnetic resonance imaging, 7.7 for Ca-125, and 5.0 for transvaginal ultrasound. Fifty-six percent of women with a variant of unknown significance were reclassified after a median of 39 months, longer than the median time to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (18.6 months) or risk-reducing mastectomy (20.1 months). CONCLUSION Uptake of risk-reducing strategies among women with a variant of unknown significance is lower than among women with a deleterious mutation. Given the prognostic uncertainty and high rate of reclassification for women with a variant of unknown significance, individualizing counseling and directing efforts toward surveillance, chemoprevention, or salpingectomy are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Garcia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Liisa Lyon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Ramey D Littell
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Bethan Powell
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hooker GW, King L, Vanhusen L, Graves K, Peshkin BN, Isaacs C, Taylor KL, Poggi E, Schwartz MD. Long-term satisfaction and quality of life following risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2014; 12:9. [PMID: 24690515 PMCID: PMC3977895 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-12-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As BRCA1/2 testing becomes more routine, questions remain about long-term satisfaction and quality of life following testing. Previously, we described long term distress and risk management outcomes among women with BRCA1/2 mutations. This study addresses positive psychological outcomes in BRCA1/2 carriers, describing decision satisfaction and quality of life in the years following testing. Methods We evaluated satisfaction with testing and management decisions among 144 BRCA1/2 carriers. Prior to genetic testing, we assessed family history, sociodemographics and distress. At a mean of 5.3 years post-testing, we assessed management decisions, satisfaction with decisions and, among women with cancer, quality of life. Results Overall, satisfaction with decision making was high. Women who had risk reducing mastectomy or oophorectomy were more satisfied with management decisions. Participants who obtained a risk reducing oophorectomy were more satisfied with their genetic testing decision. Among affected carriers, high pretest anxiety was associated with poorer quality of life and having had risk reducing mastectomy prior to testing was associated with better quality of life. The negative impact of pre-test anxiety was diminished among women who had mastectomies before testing. Conclusions BRCA1/2 carriers are satisfied with their testing and risk management decisions and report good quality of life years after testing. Having risk reducing surgery predicts increased satisfaction and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Factors influencing uptake and timing. Maturitas 2014; 77:180-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|