Clinicopathologic Features, Survival Outcome, and Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer Patients 18-40 Years of Age

Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young gastric cancer patients: A propensity score‑matched SEER database analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether young patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) had distinct metastasis patterns and survival outcomes from older patients remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to explore the metastasis patterns and prognostic factors in young patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients with metastatic GC in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: younger (≤40 years old) and older (>40 years old). We employed the chi-squared test to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between the two age groups. Furthermore, we conducted survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. To balance disparities in baseline characteristics, we employed propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

We identified 5,580 metastatic GC patients from the SEER database, with 237 (4.2%) classified as younger and 5343 (95.8%) as older patients. A total of 237 pairs of patients were generated after adjustment by PSM. Patients in the younger group exhibited a higher proportion of bone-only metastases and a lower proportion of liver-only metastases compared with patients in the older group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that youth was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) before and after PSM, but not for gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS). Among the younger group, patients with liver-only metastasis demonstrated the best prognosis, whereas patients with lung-only metastasis exhibited significantly worse survival outcomes compared with liver-only metastases, even comparable to that of bone metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the older group, the metastatic GC patients in the younger group exhibited more aggressive tumors but better prognoses. The metastasis pattern and its effect on the prognosis of GC varied by age group.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in young patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in young adults (GCYA) counts for 10-15% of diagnoses. Previous studies have mainly focused on surgical outcomes in patients with resectable tumors; however, systemic therapy for advanced GCYA remains under-evaluated. This study aims to assess the efficacy-related outcomes and safety of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in younger versus older patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line polychemotherapy between January 2008 and October 2022 were included. We compared clinicopathological features, therapies received, efficacy-related outcomes, and toxicity between individuals aged < and ≥ 45 years.

RESULTS

Out of 3386 patients, 263 (7.8%) were < 45 years. Young patients exhibited a higher proportion of females affected, lower ECOG-PS ≥ 2, fewer comorbidities, and more aggressive disease-related features, such as higher proportion of diffuse subtype, signet-ring cells, plastic linitis, grade 3, peritoneal metastases and metastatic disease at diagnosis. They received more triple-agent combinations and underwent more surgeries in metastatic setting. No significant differences were observed between groups in overall response rate (53.1% vs. 52.3% in < and ≥ 45 years, respectively, p = 0.579), progression-free survival (6.1 vs. 6.83 months, p = 0.158) and overall survival (11.07 vs. 10.81 months, p = 0.82), even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable in both groups, although toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation was more frequent in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, younger patients with GCYA exhibited more aggressive clinicopathological features, and despite receiving more aggressive treatments, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity profiles were achieved compared to their older counterparts. In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, GEAC in < 45 years showed more aggressive clinicopathological features and, although treated with more intense first-line CT regimens, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity were achieved compared to older patients.

KLF5‑mediated expression of CARD11 promotes the progression of gastric cancer

Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 11 (CARD11) has been reported as functioning in multiple types of cancers. In the present study, the role and mechanism of CARD11 in gastric cancer was investigated. First, CARD11 expression in gastric cancer tissues and the association of CARD11 with overall survival were analyzed by the encyclopedia of RNA interactomes database. CARD11 expression in gastric cancer cells was detected by western blotting and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR analyses. After CARD11 silencing, cell proliferation was evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine staining and flow cytometry analysis. Wound healing and Transwell assays were used to measure the capacities of cell migration and invasion. Additionally, the expression levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins and mTOR-related proteins were detected by western blot analysis. HumanTFDB predicted the binding of the transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) to the CARD11 promoter, which was confirmed by dual luciferase reporter and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. To explore the regulatory effects between KLF5 and CARD11, KLF5 was overexpressed to perform the rescue experiments in gastric cancer cells with CARD11 silencing. Results revealed that CARD11 was highly expressed in gastric cancer and was associated with poor prognosis. CARD11 interference inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells and induced cell cycle arrest. Additionally, CARD11 silencing suppressed the migration, invasion and EMT of gastric cancer cells, accompanied by upregulated E-cadherin expression and downregulated N-cadherin and vimentin expression. Moreover, the transcription factor KLF5 positively regulated the transcription of CARD11 in gastric cancer. KLF5 overexpression reversed the effects of interference of CARD11 expression in gastric cancer cells to promote their proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT. KLF5 overexpression also led to a reduction in cell cycle arrest. Finally, interference of CARD11 expression suppressed the mTOR pathway, which was activated by KLF5. In conclusion, KLF5-mediated CARD11 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells.

Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer

To explore the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognosis of very young gastric cancer (GC). From January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2021, GC patients under 30 years old treated in three tertiary hospitals were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics were summarized, prognostic factors and survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred patients were finally included, with a median age of 23 years.73 (73.0%) were female. Most patients had initial symptoms of abdominal pain (66.0%). The most common tumor locations were gastric antrum (38.0%) and gastric body (37.0%). The main histological types were diffuse (81.0%) and poorly differentiated (91.0%). Most patients presented with stage III-IV disease (82.0%) at diagnosis and the common sites of metastasis were ovary (39.5%) and peritoneum (27.6%). The mOS of the whole group was 23.3 months (95% CI 17.2-29.4). Moreover, the mOS of patients at stage I-II was not reached. The mOS of patients at stage III and stage IV was 40.6 months (95% CI 10.2-70.9) and 10.3 months (95% CI 8.9-11.6), respectively. The mDFS of stage I-III patients was 28.5 months (95% CI 14.7-42.3), and the mPFS of the metastatic patients was 4.5 months (95% CI 4.0-5.0). TNM stage (P = 0.005) and radical surgery (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. The very young GC were predominantly female, diffuse type, and advanced diagnosis. TNM stage and radical surgery were independent prognosis factors for overall survival.

Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Markers

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a group of highly lethal malignant tumors that seriously threaten human health. The main way to improve the survival quality and reduce the mortality of HCC is early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, it will be of great significance to explore new quantitative detection methods for HCC markers. With the rapid development of electrochemical biosensors and nanomaterials, electrochemical sensors based on graphene can detect tumor markers, with the advantages of simple operation, high detection sensitivity, and specificity. Combined with the published literature in recent years, the article briefly reviews the application of graphene-based electrochemical biosensors in the detection of HCC markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Golgi protein-73 (GP73), exosomes, and microRNA-122 (miR-122).

Clinical Features and Survival of Young Adults with Stage IV Gastric Cancer: a Japanese Population-Based Study

PURPOSE

With the aging of society, the mean age of patients with gastric cancer (GC) in Japan has increased. However, there are few documented outcomes for young patients with stage IV GC. We investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of such patients aged < 40 years using a dataset from an integrated population-based cohort study.

METHODS

We conducted this multicenter population-based cohort study to determine whether earlier onset of GC was a poor prognostic factor. We enrolled patients with metastatic GC aged < 40 years (young group) and those aged between 60 and 75 years (middle-aged group). Patients were histologically diagnosed as having gastric adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the overall survival (OS) of both groups and the hazard ratio (HR) for OS based on age. The adjusted HR with 95% confidence interval (CI) was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model after adjusting for confounding factors, including sex, histology, number of metastatic lesions, surgical resection, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 555 patients. The patients were classified into the young (n = 20) and the middle-aged group (n = 535). The median OS durations were 5.7 and 8.8 months in the young and middle-aged groups, respectively (p = 0.029). The adjusted HR (95% CI) of the young group was 1.88 (1.17-3.04, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Age was an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage IV GC. Further studies investigating the genomic characteristics of GC and exploring more effective chemotherapeutic agents are required.

STROBE-clinical characteristics and prognosis factors of gastric cancer in young patients aged ≤30 years

We aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and prognosis factors of young patients with gastric cancer (GC).A total of 101 young patients with GC referred to Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan province, China between January 1st, 2003 and June 1st, 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The medical records included ages, genders, marital status, family history of tumors, comorbidity, Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection, fibrinogen, prealbumin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumor location, tumor size, TNM stage, differentiation of the tumor, WHO type, treatment method and prognostic factors effect were further assessed.The mean age of GC patients in our group was 26.0 years. The incidence was slightly higher in females (female: male = 1.1:1). Some patients had the family history of tumor and H.pylori infection (2.0%, 6.9%). The tumor sizes were mainly under 5 cm (52.4%) and the most locations were in the antrum (43.5%) and body (42.5%). A large number of patients were diagnosed as adenocarcinomas (66.3%) and the main histological of GC was poor differentiated (72.3%). Moreover, a high proportion of patients were diagnosed at the stages III-IV (61.4%), and most patients received surgery combined chemotherapy (63.4%), however, the survival outcome was poor. In univariate Cox analysis, tumor sizes, TNM stage were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and the multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that TNM stage was significantly associated with OS.GC in young patients has its unique biological and clinical features. A large majority of young patients were diagnosed at their advanced stages with poor prognostic. TNM stage was an independent prognostic factor for young patients with GC, early GC screening in young people should be actively promoted.