Ocular Surface Tolerability of Prostaglandin Analogs in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost

BACKGROUND

Bimatoprost has emerged as a significant medication in the field of medicine over the past several decades, with diverse applications in ophthalmology, dermatology, and beyond. Originally developed as an ocular hypotensive agent, it has proven highly effective in treating glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Its ability to reduce intraocular pressure has established it as a first-line treatment option, improving management and preventing vision loss. In dermatology, bimatoprost has shown promising results in the promotion of hair growth, particularly in the treatment of alopecia and hypotrichosis. Its mechanism of action, stimulating the hair cycle and prolonging the growth phase, has led to the development of bimatoprost-containing solutions for enhancing eyelash growth.

AIM

The aim of our review is to provide a brief description, overview, and studies in the current literature regarding the versatile clinical use of bimatoprost in recent years. This can help clinicians determine the most suitable individualized therapy to meet the needs of each patient.

METHODS

Our methods involve a comprehensive review of the latest advancements reported in the literature in bimatoprost formulations, which range from traditional eye drops to sustained-release implants. These innovations offer extended drug delivery, enhance patient compliance, and minimize side effects.

RESULTS

The vast literature published on PubMed has confirmed the clinical usefulness of bimatoprost in lowering intraocular pressure and in managing patients with glaucoma. Numerous studies have shown promising results in dermatology and esthetics in promoting hair growth, particularly in treating alopecia and hypotrichosis. Its mechanism of action involves stimulating the hair cycle and prolonging the growth phase, leading to the development of solutions that enhance eyelash growth. The global use of bimatoprost has expanded significantly, with applications growing beyond its initial indications. Ongoing research is exploring its potential in glaucoma surgery, neuroprotection, and cosmetic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimatoprost has shown immense potential for addressing a wide range of therapeutic needs through various formulations and advancements. Promising future perspectives include the exploration of novel delivery systems such as contact lenses and microneedles to further enhance drug efficacy and patient comfort. Ongoing research and future perspectives continue to shape its role in medicine, promising further advancements and improved patient outcomes.

The use of benzalkonium chloride in topical glaucoma treatment: An investigation of the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride-preserved intraocular pressure-lowering eye drops and their effect on conjunctival goblet cells

ENGLISH SUMMARY

Glaucoma is a leading cause of the global prevalence of irreversible blindness. The pathogenesis of glaucoma is not entirely known, but the major risk factors include advancing age, genetic predisposition, and increased intraocular pressure (IOP). The only evidence-based treatment is a lowering of IOP through the use of eye drops, laser procedures, or surgical interventions. Although laser treatment is gaining recognition as a first-choice treatment option, the most common approach for managing glaucoma is IOP-lowering eye drops. A major challenge in the treatment is the occurrence of adverse events and poor adherence. In this context, the ocular surface is an area of great concern, as most glaucoma patients have dry eye disease (DED), which is largely caused by eye drops. Preservation with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is a controversial topic due to its potential role as a significant cause of DED. A systematic review and meta-analyses investigate potential differences in efficacy and safety between BAK-preserved and BAK-free anti-glaucomatous eye drops (I). Many of the included studies report on ocular surface damage caused by the application of BAK-preserved eye drops. However, the meta-analyses addressing hyperemia, number of ocular adverse events, and tear break-up time did not identify any significant differences. The latter is likely due to varying measurement methods, different endpoints, and study durations. It is, therefore, possible that the large variations between the studies conceal differences in the safety profiles. The efficacy meta-analysis finds that there are no differences in the IOP-lowering effect between BAK-preserved and BAK-free eye drops, indicating that BAK is not necessary for the effectiveness of eye drops. To promote more homogeneous choices of endpoints and methods when evaluating BAK-preserved and BAK-free glaucoma treatments, a Delphi consensus statement was performed. In this study, glaucoma experts and ocular surface disease experts reached consensus on the key factors to consider when designing such studies (II). The hope is to have more studies with comparable endpoints that can systematically show the potentially adverse effects of BAK. The preclinical studies in the current Ph.D. research focus on conjunctival goblet cells (GCs). GCs are important for the ocular surface because they release the mucin MUC5AC, which is an essential component of the inner layer of the tear film. BAK preservation may damage the GCs and result in a low GC density, leading to an unstable tear film and DED. The most commonly used IOP-lowering drugs are prostaglandin analogs (PGAs). Thus, the conducted studies investigate the effect of PGAs preserved in different ways on GCs. BAK-preserved latanoprost is cytotoxic to primary cultured human conjunctival GCs and results in a scattered expression of MUC5AC, in contrast to negative controls, where MUC5AC is localized around the cell nucleus (III). Preservative-free (PF) latanoprost is not cytotoxic and does not affect the MUC5AC expression pattern. Furthermore, BAK-preserved travoprost is found to be cytotoxic in a time-dependent manner, while Polyquad®-preserved travoprost does not affect GC survival at any measured time point (IV). Both Polyquad and BAK induce scattered expression of MUC5AC. The cytotoxicity of BAK-preserved PGA eye drops is higher compared to the safer profile of PF and Polyquad-preserved PGA eye drops (V). Additionally, PF latanoprost does not increase the release of the inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8, unlike BAK-preserved latanoprost. A review highlights the active and inactive components of IOP-lowering eye drops (VI). Several preclinical and clinical studies have identified adverse effects of BAK. Although other components, such as the active drug and phosphates, can also cause adverse events, the review clearly states that BAK alone is a major source of decreased tolerability. The conclusion of this thesis is that BAK preservation is unnecessary and harmful to the ocular surface. The preclinical studies demonstrate that GCs die when exposed to BAK. Furthermore, they find that BAK induces a pro-inflammatory response. The review included in the thesis concludes that BAK should be phased out of eye drops for chronic use. Overall, the inclusion of BAK poses a risk of developing DED and poor adherence, which can ultimately lead to disease progression and blindness.

The molecular aspect of anti-glaucomatous eye drops - are we harming our patients?

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness. Progression is halted with a reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP), which is most often achieved with eye drops. A major challenge in the topical treatment of glaucoma patients is the many side effects and the resulting reduced adherence. Side effects may of course be due to the molecular properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). There are currently six different APIs available: prostaglandin analogues, β-adrenergic inhibitors, α-adrenergic agonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, rho-kinase inhibitors and muscarinic 3 agonists. But the additives used in eye drops are also known to cause damage to the ocular surface and to some extent also to the deeper tissues. Said additives are considered inactive molecular components and are added to secure for instance viscosity and pH value, and to prevent contamination. There has been an increasing focus on the harmful effects of preservatives, with the most commonly used preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) being particularly controversial. BAK has long been recognized as a toxin that increases the risk of ocular discomfort. This can affect the adherence and ultimately result in lack of disease control. Other issues include the addition of certain buffers, such as phosphates, and varying pH values. This review will address the different molecular components of the IOP-lowering eye drops and what to be aware of when prescribing topical glaucoma treatment.

Recovery of deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus after switching from prostaglandin FP receptor agonists to EP2 receptor agonist: a 3-month prospective analysis

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of switching from a prostanoid FP receptor agonists to EP2 receptor agonist (omidenepag isopropyl) on the deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus (DUES) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in Japanese glaucoma patients over 3 months post treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Patients with glaucoma who received FP receptor agonists treatment and had complained of DUES-related reduction in quality of life were included. Their FP receptor agonists was switched to omidenepag isopropyl without a drug holiday. At baseline and 1 and 3 months post-switch, photographs were taken and the changes in DUES were assessed by three independent observers. IOP and adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 23 eyes of 23 patients (6 men, 17 women; average age, 60.6 years). After switching, DUES improved in 12 eyes at 1 month and in 16 eyes at 3 months; eyes in the remaining patients showed no worsening of the condition. The mean IOP before switching was 15.3 ± 3.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval 13.9-16.7 mmHg). Following the switch, the mean IOP values were 15.6 ± 3.3 mmHg (14.1-17.0 mmHg) at 1 month and 15.5 ± 3.3 mmHg (14.1-16.9 mmHg) at 3 months (P = 1.0 at 1 month, P = 1.0 at 3 months; both adjusted by Bonferroni correction). No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Omidenepag isopropyl improved DUES while maintaining IOP in over 70% of Japanese patients with glaucoma who exhibited DUES caused by FP receptor agonists; the improvement was observed within 3 months after switching from FP receptor agonists.

Ocular Surface Changes in Prostaglandin Analogue-Treated Patients

Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness globally. Reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) has been acknowledged to be the main therapy for glaucoma. Prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) have become the first-line therapy for patients with glaucoma due to their powerful efficacy for lowering (IOP). However, usage of PGAs can also cause several notable side effects, including the changes in ocular surface. The relationship between PGAs and ocular surface changes is complicated and still remains unclear. In the present review, we summarize the recent studies of the effects of PGAs on ocular changes as well as the possible mechanisms that might provide new considerations during clinical medication.

Effect of Switching to Travoprost Preserved With SofZia in Glaucoma Patients With Chronic Superficial Punctate Keratitis While Receiving BAK-preserved Latanoprost

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of switching 1 eye to topical travoprost 0.004% preserved with SofZia (TRAVATAN Z solution) in patients who had chronic superficial punctate keratitis (SPK) in both eyes treated with benzalkonium chloride-preserved latanoprost 0.005% (XALATAN).

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, comparative 3-month follow-up study. Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received XALATAN monotherapy for at least 3 months and had SPK in both eyes were enrolled at 9 facilities. For each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected and switched to TRAVATAN Z solution (T-group); the contralateral control eye was treated with XALATAN (X-group). SPK in 5 corneal regions, conjunctival hyperemia, tear breakup time (TBUT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were examined in a masked manner at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Changes in SPK, hyperemia, TBUT, and IOP were compared within treatment groups and between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients completed the study. The frequency of SPK significantly decreased from baseline in the T-group and the X-group at 1 and 3 months (T-group, P<0.001; X-group, P<0.05). In the T-group, SPK scores were significantly improved in 4 corneal regions, excluding the superior region, at 1 and 3 months (all P<0.05), whereas in the X-group, SPK scores were significantly improved only in the temporal region at 1 month and in the inferior region at 3 months (P<0.05 for both). The total SPK score at 1 and 3 months in the T-group was significantly lower compared with the score in the X-group (P=0.0023 and 0.0102, respectively). The SPK score for the superior and central corneal region at 3 months in the T-group was significantly lower compared with the score in the X-group (P=0.0212 and 0.022, respectively). There were no substantial intergroup or intragroup differences in changes from baseline for hyperemia scores, TBUT, or IOP reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching therapy from benzalkonium chloride-preserved latanoprost to travoprost preserved with SofZia ameliorated chronic SPK. There were no clinically relevant changes in hyperemia, TBUT, or IOP.

Vitamin A Palmitate and Carbomer Gel Protects the Conjunctiva of Patients With Long-term Prostaglandin Analogs Application

PURPOSE

To investigate the protective effects of vitamin A palmitate and carbomer gel on the morphology of conjunctival epithelium and density of goblet cells (GCs) in patients on long-term prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) application.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 23 primary open-angle glaucoma patients and 7 normal-tension glaucoma patients prescribed PGAs for >1 year were enrolled into 3 identical clinical trials and randomized into 3 groups (10 per group). Patients were treated twice daily with vitamin A palmitate eye gel 0.1%, or carbomer eye gel 0.2%, or no additional application of these 2 drugs. Ocular surface disease index questionnaires, Schirmer 1 test without anesthesia, tear break-up time test, and GCs density assessment by in vivo confocal microscopy and conjunctival impression cytology analysis were performed at baseline and at months 1, 3, and 6 of the study.

RESULTS

Both vitamin A palmitate and carbomer gel led to a significant improvement in ocular surface disease index questionnaires score and prevented the gradual decline in tear break-up time. Vitamin A palmitate significantly increased the GC density after treatment. The GC density assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy positively correlated with that measured by conjunctival impression cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin A palmitate and carbomer eye gel can effectively relieve dry eye symptom caused by long-term application of PGAs by increasing the GCs density and thereby reducing the toxicity to the conjunctiva. Vitamin A palmitate and carbomer eye gel may be valuable alternatives for glaucoma patients who prescribed long-term PGAs.

The Effects of Latanoprost With Benzalkonium Chloride Versus Travoprost With SofZia on the Ocular Surface

PURPOSE

To assess ocular surface changes in participants using latanoprost with benzalkonium chloride (Xalatan) and travoprost with SofZia (Travatan Z).

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, nonrandomized cohort study, participants were classified into two groups: group 1 (n=28) naive to glaucoma therapy, group 2 (n=27) on previous Xalatan monotherapy in both eyes. Both groups started (or continued) Xalatan in the right eye and Travatan Z in the left eye. Baseline, 1-, and 2-month measurements of tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining score, conjunctival staining score, conjunctival hyperemia score, tear production, and intraocular pressure were obtained. The Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire measured participants' comfort and dryness symptoms. Medication preference was recorded.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 55 participants. Tear breakup time at baseline and 1-month follow-up in group 1 was significantly longer than that of group 2 (P=0.005). At 2 months, there was no significant difference in TBUT between the two groups (P=0.779). Tear production in group 1 at all three time points was significantly higher than group 2 (P<0.05). Conjunctival staining score at 2 months in group 1 was significantly higher than group 2 (P=0.031). There was no significant difference in other parameters between the groups at any other time point. No significant difference in any parameter was found between Xalatan and Travatan Z (intragroup comparison).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in ocular surface characteristics were detected between groups, but no significant difference was detected between participants treated with Xalatan and Travatan Z.

Association between Glaucoma Medication Usage and Dry Eye in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between glaucoma medication usage and dry eye using a Taiwan nationally representative sample.

METHODS

We identified patients with glaucoma diagnoses (ICD-9-CM [International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification] codes 365) from Taiwan claims data. The study group included 2065 glaucoma patients with newly diagnosed dry eye (ICD-9-CM code 375.15) identified during 2000 and 2011. The control subjects were 8260 glaucoma patients without dry eye who were frequency matched for age, sex, and the year of the index date. The following variables were considered: sex (male/female) and age (12 to 34 years, 35 to 49 years, 50 to 64 years, and ≥ 65 years). Six available glaucoma drugs in Taiwan were analyzed, namely, prostaglandin analog, β-blocker, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, α-agonists, pilocarpine, and combination drugs. Univariate and multivariate unconditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the effects of glaucoma treatment and comorbidities on the risk of dry eye as indicated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Further analysis was performed to assess the dose-response effect on the risk of dry eye according to the cumulative number of different types of glaucoma medications used.

RESULTS

Among the 2065 dry eye case patients, 63.3% were female and 48.9% were aged 65 years and older. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, an increased risk of dry eye was observed for all glaucoma medications (prostaglandin analog: adjusted OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.69; β-blocker: adjusted OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.83; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor: adjusted OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.59; pilocarpine: adjusted OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.32; combination drugs: adjusted OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58) with the exception of α-agonists. The adjusted OR of having dry eye increased with the number of glaucoma medications used. Similar trends were observed for both female and male subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased number of glaucoma medications used may increase dry eye risk, particularly in subjects who use more than two types of glaucoma medications and in female subjects. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing medications for glaucoma patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Benzalkonium Chloride-optimized Tafluprost in Japanese Glaucoma Patients With Existing Superficial Punctate Keratitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-optimized tafluprost (with a BAK concentration reduced from 0.01% to 0.001%) in glaucoma patients with existing superficial punctate keratitis (SPK).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to compare BAK-optimized tafluprost administered over 12 weeks relative to other preserved prostaglandin analogs previously administered in Japanese glaucoma patients. Thirty patients with SPK graded at <6 points by area density (AD) scoring in 1 eye were recruited. The primary outcome measure was change in AD score at 12 weeks after the switch in treatment compared with that at baseline. Secondary outcome measures included changes in tear film breakup time (TBUT), hyperemia score, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Four patients were excluded from analysis because of treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Mean AD score±SD decreased significantly from 3.4±0.9 to 1.8±1.8 after the switch (P<0.0001). Mean TBUT increased significantly from 6.3±3.3 to 8.0±4.2 seconds (P<0.01). Mean hyperemia score remained unchanged, whereas mean IOP decreased significantly from 15.6±2.6 to 14.4±2.0 mm Hg (P<0.01). For patients previously treated with BAK-preserved latanoprost (n=17) or bimatoprost (n=2), mean AD score decreased significantly from 3.4±0.9 to 1.8±1.8 (P<0.01) and mean TBUT increased significantly from 6.4±3.6 to 8.2±4.3 seconds (P<0.01); no such changes were apparent for patients previously treated with sofZia-preserved travoprost (n=7).

CONCLUSIONS

BAK-optimized tafluprost is a treatment option to improve the condition of the ocular surface and to maintain IOP control in glaucoma patients with existing SPK who have been previously treated with other BAK-preserved prostaglandin analogs.

New prostaglandin analog formulation for glaucoma treatment containing cyclodextrins for improved stability, solubility and ocular tolerance

Latanoprost is a practically insoluble prostaglandin F2α analog considered a first-line agent for glaucoma treatment. From a pharmaceutical point of view, latanoprost is challenging to be formulated as an eye drop due to its poor water solubility and the presence of an ester bond that needs to be cleaved in vivo but maintained unchanged during storage. Cyclodextrins (CDs) are known to form complexes with hydrophobic drugs, influencing their stability, availability, solubility, and tolerance in a non-predictable manner. A variety of CDs including native α, β, and γCDs as well as substituted hydroxypropylβCD, hydroxypropylγCD, dimethylβCD, sulphatedβCD, and propylaminoβCD were screened and the most appropriate CD for the formulation of latanoprost for an ocular topical application was selected. Among the tested CDs, propylaminoβCD had the best trade-off between latanoprost stability and availability, which was confirmed by its complex constant value of 3129M(-1). Phase-solubility and NMR investigations demonstrated that the propylaminoβCD effectively formed a complex involving the ester group of latanoprost providing protection to its ester bond, while ensuring proper latanoprost solubilization. Furthermore, in vivo experiments demonstrated that the latanoprost-propylaminoβCD formulation led to lower ocular irritation than the commercial latanoprost formulation used as a reference. The latanoprost-propylaminoβCD formulation was demonstrated to successfully address the main stability, solubility, and tolerance limitations of topical ocular latanoprost therapy for glaucoma.

Comparison of the toxicity profile of benzalkonium chloride-preserved tafluprost and SofZia-preserved travoprost applied to the ocular surface

PURPOSE

To evaluate some clinically important features of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) toxicity by comparing tafluprost with 0.001% BAK and travoprost preserved with SofZia applied to the ocular surface of the eyes with glaucoma.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, observer unmasked, multicenter crossover trial. A total of 195 patients were randomized and 174 patients completed the study at 19 clinics between November 2011 and August 2012. Topical BAK-preserved tafluprost or SofZia-preserved travoprost was newly administered or continued. Superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK), tear break-up time (BUT), the conjunctival hyperemia score, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared at the baseline visit, 4, and 12 weeks after the start of therapy. The eye drops were switched to another eye drop after 12 weeks of observation.

RESULTS

The total SPK and conjunctival hyperemia scores were significantly lower in the tafluprost compared with those in the travoprost phase (both P=0.038). There were no significant differences in the SPK scores of the superior area (P=0.679), central area (P=0.089), inferior area (P=0.090), and tear BUT (P=0.271). The IOP-lowering effects were similar (P=0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

SPK, hyperemia score, and tear BUT while using tafluprost with 0.001% BAK were not inferior compared with those caused by travoprost with SofZia.

Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% therapy for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients in China

BACKGROUND

To report the clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated with bimatoprost 0.03% therapy.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-three Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension who needed initial or additional intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering were recruited in this prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical study and were treated with bimatoprost 0.03%. Patients received bimatoprost 0.03% as initial, replacement or adjunctive IOP-lowering therapy, and follow-up visits were performed at week 1, and month 1 and 3 of the bimatoprost treatment. The efficacy outcome measure was the post-treatment IOP level. The safety outcome measures included the rate of medication-related symptoms, physical signs, reported adverse events, and the level of conjunctival hyperemia.

RESULTS

Among 240 patients who could be categorized by pre-existing therapies and the bimatoprost therapy regimen in the study, IOP values observed in all medication conditions showed significant IOP reduction at all study visits compared with baseline. At 3 months, 8.0 ± 3.7 mmHg (32.0%) reduction in IOP was observed in treatment-naive patients after bimatoprost monotherapy; in the patients previously on various therapy regimens, 1.9 ± 2.8 mmHg (9.5%) to 6.4 ± 6.1 mmHg (24.8%) additional IOP lowering was achieved after switching to bimatoprost monotherapy or bimatoprost combination therapy. The most common adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, mainly of trace and mild intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that bimatoprost 0.03% was effective in lowering IOP with favorable safety in Chinese primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.

The diurnal and nocturnal effect of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure

PURPOSE

To determine the 24-hour effects of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure as well as the endurance of IOP lowering after last dosing.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

METHODS

Forty subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were admitted to our sleep laboratory for three 24-hour sessions monitoring IOP, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate. The first baseline session occurred after medication washout or immediately after enrollment for treatment-naïve patients. A second 24-hour monitoring session was performed after 4 weeks of once-nightly treatment of travoprost with sofZia. The medication was then discontinued and a third 24-hour session was completed 60-84 hours after the last dose taken. IOP measurements were taken using a pneumotonometer every 2 hours in the sitting position during the 16-hour diurnal period and in the supine position during the 8-hour nocturnal period. Ocular perfusion pressure was defined as 2/3[diastolic BP + 1/3(systolic BP - diastolic BP)] - IOP.

RESULTS

Treatment with travoprost with sofZia significantly lowered mean diurnal and nocturnal IOP levels from baseline (diurnal 18.1 ± 3.9 to 15.3 ± 3.3 mm Hg; nocturnal 20.6 ± 3.6 to 19.4 ± 3.4 mm Hg, P < .01 for both). Once treatment was discontinued, mean IOP remained at levels significantly less than baseline during both the diurnal (16.6 ± 3.8 mm Hg) and nocturnal periods (19.4 ± 3.5 mm Hg). Mean baseline ocular perfusion pressure was significantly increased during the diurnal but not the nocturnal period (diurnal 73.7 ± 11.4 to 76.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg, P = .01; nocturnal 64.4 ± 12.6 to 64.2 ± 11.1 mm Hg, P = .67).

CONCLUSION

Travoprost with sofZia significantly lowers IOP throughout the diurnal and nocturnal periods, and increases ocular perfusion pressure in the diurnal, but not the nocturnal, period in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The treatment effect on IOP endures for at least 84 hours after the last dose.

Benzalkonium chloride and glaucoma

Glaucoma patients routinely take multiple medications, with multiple daily doses, for years or even decades. Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is the most common preservative in glaucoma medications. BAK has been detected in the trabecular meshwork (TM), corneal endothelium, lens, and retina after topical drop installation and may accumulate in those tissues. There is evidence that BAK causes corneal and conjunctival toxicity, including cell loss, disruption of tight junctions, apoptosis and preapoptosis, cytoskeleton changes, and immunoinflammatory reactions. These same effects have been reported in cultured human TM cells exposed to concentrations of BAK found in common glaucoma drugs and in the TM of primary open-angle glaucoma donor eyes. It is possible that a relationship exists between chronic exposure to BAK and glaucoma. The hypothesis that BAK causes/worsens glaucoma is being tested experimentally in an animal model that closely reflects human physiology.

Glaucoma therapy and ocular surface disease: current literature and recommendations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on clinical and experimental literature for ocular surface effects of glaucoma therapy and to provide practical guidelines for ophthalmologists treating glaucoma patients with ocular surface disease (OSD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Preservatives, notably benzalkonium chloride (BAK), continue to contribute to OSD and demonstrate a variety of toxic ocular effects both in-vitro, and in animal/human studies. Recent literature frequently compares BAK with Polyquad, SofZia, and preservative-free therapies. Some clinical benefit has been demonstrated with newer BAK-free alternatives.

SUMMARY

BAK-free and preservative-free therapies are becoming available but are not always a feasible alternative. It is important to recognize different clinical manifestations of allergy and chronic inflammation and to discuss options for patients experiencing OSD.

Ocular surface tolerability of prostaglandin analogs and prostamides in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

INTRODUCTION

There has been increased attention on the potential impact of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the ocular surface. This study compared the ocular surface tolerability of once-daily bimatoprost 0.01% and latanoprost 0.005% (both preserved with 0.02% BAK), and travoprost 0.004% preserved with sofZia™.

METHODS

A randomized, multicenter (15 sites), investigator-masked study enrolled patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had received latanoprost monotherapy for at least 1 month. Patients were randomized to oncedaily bimatoprost (n = 56), travoprost (n = 53), or latanoprost (n = 55) monotherapy for 3 months. Follow-up visits were at weeks 1, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was physician-graded conjunctival hyperemia (scale 0 to 3) at week 12. Secondary outcomes included corneal staining (scale 0 to 3) and tear break-up time (TBUT).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean (standard deviation [SD]) outcome measures including conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.48 [0.52], travoprost: 0.49 [0.52], latanoprost: 0.51 [0.54]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.49], travoprost: 0.25 [0.46], latanoprost: 0.24 [0.45]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [6.1], travoprost: 9.5 s [5.8], latanoprost: 9.8 s [5.0]) among subjects at latanoprost-treated baseline (P ≥ 0.664). At week 12, there were no significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.42 [0.48], travoprost: 0.46 [0.44], latanoprost: 0.44 [0.57]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.45], travoprost: 0.32 [0.48], latanoprost: 0.22 [0.30]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [5.7], travoprost 9.7 s [5.0], latanoprost: 9.3 s [4.0]) among the treatment groups (P ≥ 0.379). At week 1, there was a statistically significant among-group difference in mean change from baseline in hyperemia (+0.04, bimatoprost; +0.20, travoprost; 0.00, latanoprost; P = 0.018). There were no statistically significant among-group differences in mean corneal staining, mean TBUT, or change from baseline at any visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preservative differences, there were no significant differences in objective clinical measures of ocular surface tolerability after 3 months of treatment with bimatoprost (with 0.02% BAK), travoprost (with sofZia), and latanoprost (with 0.02% BAK).

Effects of SofZia-preserved travoprost and benzalkonium chloride-preserved latanoprost on the ocular surface -- a multicentre randomized single-masked study

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of SofZia-preserved travoprost on ocular surface conditions in comparison with benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost.

METHODS

A prospective randomized multicentre single-masked comparative study. Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had been treated with BAK-preserved latanoprost 0.005% (Xalatan(®) ) monotherapy for at least 3 months. Patients were enrolled at 23 facilities. Patients were randomly divided into the X-X group, continuous use of Xalatan(®) , or the X-T group, switching from Xalatan(®) to SofZia-preserved travoprost 0.004% (TravatanZ(®) ), and followed for 3 months. The superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK), conjunctival epitheliopathy, hyperaemia, tear break-up time (TBUT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were examined for each patient in a masked manner. Changes in the frequency of keratoconjunctival epitheliopathy were evaluated 3 months after study initiation. Intra- and intergroup comparisons of changes in SPK, conjunctival epitheliopathy, hyperaemia, TBUT and IOP were also carried out.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty patients participated and 215 completed the 3-month study. The frequency of keratoconjunctival epitheliopathy significantly decreased in the X-T group (p = 0.036) and the intergroup difference was also significant (p = 0.001). SPK scores and TBUT were significantly improved in the X-T group (p = 0.034, 0.049), also with significant intergroup differences in the cornea excluding the inferior area and TBUT. There were no significant intergroup differences in changes of the hyperaemia scores and the IOP reduction.

CONCLUSION

Switching to SofZia-preserved travoprost after BAK-preserved latanoprost resulted in a lower incidence of keratoconjunctival epitheliopathy, especially in the cornea, with no clinically relevant changes in hyperaemia and IOP.

Therapeutic uses of prostaglandin F(2α) analogues in ocular disease and novel synthetic strategies

The pharmacological management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension has significantly changed over the last 18 years with the introduction of PGF2α analogues, more specifically latanoprost (6), travoprost (8), bimatoprost (10) and tafluprost (12). Prostanoids are currently the first-line medicines among ocular antihypertensive drugs in terms of efficacy, safety, patient compliance and medical economy. Their ability to effectively reduce intraocular pressure with once-per-day dosing, ocular tolerability comparable to timolol and general lack of systemic adverse effects have made them the mainstay of pharmacological therapy for glaucoma and ocular hypertension all over the world. The present review reports a novel, convergent and highly diastereoselective method for the synthesis of PGF2α analogues from the structurally advanced prostaglandin phenylsulfone (5Z)-(+)-15 and new ω-chain synthons. The biochemistry, clinical efficacy and side effects of four commercially available PGF2α analogues, currently used as first-line agents for reducing intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, are also discussed.

Corneal epithelial cell viability following exposure to ophthalmic solutions containing preservatives and/or antihypertensive agents

INTRODUCTION

This in-vitro study compared the toxicity of bimatoprost 0.01% containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) 0.02% with other commercial BAK-free or BAK-containing prostaglandin analogs.

METHODS

Six test solutions were evaluated: travoprost 0.004% with polyquaternium-1 0.001% (PQ), PQ, bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK 0.02%, latanoprost 0.005% with BAK 0.02%, tafluprost 0.0015% preservative free (PF), and BAK 0.02%. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was the live control and 70% methanol was the dead control. Confluent human corneal epithelial cells were incubated with test solutions (diluted 1:5 or 1:10 with PBS) or control solutions for 10 or 25 min, after which cells were fluorescently labeled to distinguish live and dead cells. Data were expressed as a percentage of PBS live-cell fluorescence for automated readouts. Live and dead cells were manually counted for numeric analyses.

RESULTS

For 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions using automated readout, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significant reductions in the live cell signal compared with PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone (all P < 0.001). They also demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than tafluprost PF for 1:5 dilutions (all P < 0.001) and 1:10 dilutions (P ≤ 0.02), except for 1:10-diluted bimatoprost with BAK (P = 0.41). For 1:5 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK demonstrated significant reductions in the percentage of live cells compared with PBS (P = 0.02). For 1:10 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than PBS, travoprost with PQ, PQ alone, and tafluprost PF (all P ≤ 0.03). No significant differences were observed among PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone under any test conditions (P ≤ 0.63).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that BAKcontaining solutions, including bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK, were toxic to human corneal epithelial cells, whereas BAK-free solutions showed little to no evidence of toxicity.

Preservative use in topical glaucoma medications

Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is the principal preservative employed in topical ocular hypotensive medications, although alternative compounds recently have begun to be employed or examined. Individual clinical trials have shown that exposure to BAK concentrations contained in ophthalmic solutions does not produce adverse sequelae in the majority of glaucoma patients, but concerns continue with regard to its long-term use. These concerns have resulted from an extensive research effort, including preclinical studies with in vitro and in vivo models, as well as recent clinical investigations dedicated specifically to this issue. The aim of this systematic literature review of both preclinical and clinical data was to determine the relevance of these findings to clinical practice. Most preclinical studies reported negative effects of BAK exposure, but with few exceptions, BAK concentrations and exposure times greatly exceeded those likely to be experienced by patients, given the normal physiological dilution by the tear film. In addition, consistent evidence of BAK-related toxicity did not emerge from our review of dedicated clinical investigations. Thus, taken together, current evidence supports the safety of BAK for most glaucoma patients, although subpopulations with abnormal tearing may benefit from alternative preservative compounds or preservative-free formulations. Further studies to identify these populations are needed.

Ophthalmic preservatives: focus on polyquaternium-1

INTRODUCTION

Ophthalmic preservatives, such as polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1), are critical for the inhibition of growth of microbial contaminants in multi-dose bottles of topical medications. These antimicrobial agents must have a high efficacy against pathogenic organisms, while maintaining a favorable tolerability and safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the ophthalmic preservative PQ-1. For comparison purposes, the most commonly used preservative, benzalkonium chloride (BAK), is also discussed. This survey focuses primarily on data collected during the past 10 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective drug delivery requires more than just an active ingredient that achieves its desired biological effect on end-target tissues. In addition, drugs must be stable in the containers that they are stored in, and must possess minimal undesired local and systemic side effects that can cause patients to decrease their adherence. In addressing these concerns, specifically in topical ophthalmic drops, one must take into account the active ingredients, vehicle components and preservatives. Medications with fewer adverse effects may lead to enhanced adherence to therapy; therefore, the induction of such adverse outcomes must be considered by physicians when treating patients with chronic ocular disease. Although BAK will continue to be used in ophthalmic medications, due to its familiarity and compatibility with a broad range of topical ocular formulations, PQ-1 is certainly a viable alternative in the preservative formulary armamentarium.

Incidence of new coding for dry eye and ocular infection in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients treated with prostaglandin analogs: retrospective analysis of three medical/pharmacy claims databases

Background

To investigate the clinical relevance of two different preservative formulations, we compared 1-year incidence rates of additional coding of dry eye, ocular infection, or ocular surface disease (either dry eye or ocular infection) in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients newly treated with latanoprost with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) or with travoprost-Z with SofZia^®.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of three U.S.-based patient-centric medical/pharmacy claims databases (MedStat, PharMetrics, i3-Ingenix). Patients were eligible if they filled a prescription for latanoprost or travoprost-Z between October 2006 and Q2 2008 (prescription date = index date) AND were continuously enrolled 6 months prior through 12 months after the index date AND had any open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension diagnosis within 90 days prior to the index date AND did not have an ocular surface disease diagnosis during the 180 days prior to the index date AND if they had not had a prescription for the index agent in the 180 days prior to the index date. Time to incidence of new coding for ocular surface disease in the first year post-index was estimated with a composite endpoint: diagnosis of dry eye or ocular infection by ICD-9-CM or Current Procedural Terminology code OR by prescription for cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion or ocular antibiotics.

Results

In all, 15,933 patients were treated with latanoprost and 7670 with travoprost-Z. Over 1 year, 4.3% of latanoprost and 4.5% of travoprost-Z patients were identified with dry eye (p = 0.28), and 10.9% and 11.1%, respectively, were identified with an ocular infection (p = 0.79). The 1-year incidence of new coding for ocular surface disease also was similar across treatments (13.9% vs 14.3%, respectively; p = 0.48).

Conclusions

The retrospective analysis of three large prescription databases revealed that open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients newly treated with latanoprost preserved with BAK or travoprost-Z preserved with SofZia did not differ statistically in rates of dry eye, ocular infection, or ocular surface disease (either dry eye or ocular infection) during the first year post-index. Claims-based analyses are limited by nonrandomization and the inability to account for over-the-counter use or samples.

A multicenter, retrospective chart review study comparing index therapy change rates in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients newly treated with latanoprost or travoprost-Z monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Because latanoprost and the original formulation of travoprost that included benzalkonium chloride (BAK) have been shown to be similar with regard to tolerability, we compared initial topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication change rates in patients newly treated with latanoprost or travoprost-Z monotherapy.

METHODS

At 14 clinical practice sites, medical records were abstracted for patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and who were ≥40 years of age, had a baseline and at least one follow-up visit, and had no prior history of ocular prostaglandin use. Data regarding demographics, ocular/systemic medical histories, clinical variables, therapy initiations and reasons for changes, adverse events, and resource utilization were recorded from randomly chosen eligible charts. Primary outcomes were rates of and reasons for changing from the initial therapy within six months and across the full study period (1000 days).

RESULTS

Data from 900 medical charts (latanoprost, 632; travoprost-Z, 268) were included. For both cohorts, average follow-up was >1 year. Cohorts were similar with regard to age (median ~67 years), gender distribution (>50% female), and diagnosis (~80% with open-angle glaucoma). Within six months, rates of index therapy change for latanoprost versus travoprost-Z were 21.2% (134/632) and 28.7% (77/268), respectively (p = 0.0148); across the full study period, rates were 34.5% (218/632) and 45.2% (121/268), respectively (p = 0.0026). Among those who changed their index therapy, insufficient IOP control was the most commonly reported reason followed by adverse events; hyperemia was the most commonly reported adverse event at index therapy change.

CONCLUSIONS

In this "real world" study of changes in therapy in patients prescribed initial monotherapy with latanoprost with BAK or travoprost-Z with SofZia, medication changes were common in both treatment groups but statistically significantly more frequent with travoprost-Z.