Effects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/Multiresistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Colonization or Infection and Isolation Measures in End of Life on Family Caregivers: Results of a Qualitative Study

Hand hygiene determinants of informal caregivers in hospitals under Pender's perspective

OBJECTIVES

to analyze hand hygiene determinants of informal caregivers in a hospital environment.

METHODS

qualitative study conducted with 55 caregivers at a university hospital in the Northeast of Brazil. A semi-structured instrument was used, adapted from Nola Pender's Health Promotion Model, from which the deductive categories were derived.

RESULTS

the general behavior included hand hygiene before meals and after using the bathroom. Sensitivity to the requirements for hand hygiene was observed, but the barriers and self-efficacy consisted of the availability of soap or alcohol-based hand sanitizers, the lack of knowledge on the importance of and forgetfulness of the practice. The reinforcement on the importance of the practice and being in a contaminated environment were influencers, and commitment, warnings, and training were indispensable.

CONCLUSIONS

benefits related to protection from infections were seen as positive determinants for hand hygiene adherence. For non-adherence, factors such as lack of sanitizing supplies, ignorance towards the importance of the activity, and forgetfulness stood out.

Smiles behind the masks: A systematic review and narrative synthesis exploring how family members of seriously ill or dying patients are supported during infectious disease outbreaks

BACKGROUND

Infection control measures during infectious disease outbreaks can have significant impacts on seriously ill and dying patients, their family, the patient-family connection, coping, grief and bereavement.

AIM

To explore how family members of patients who are seriously ill or who die during infectious disease outbreaks are supported and cared for during serious illness, before and after patient death and the factors that influence family presence around the time of death.

DESIGN

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Medline, APA PsycInfo and Embase were searched from inception to June 2020. Forward and backward searching of included papers were also undertaken. Records were independently assessed against inclusion criteria. Included papers were assessed for quality, but none were excluded.

FINDINGS

Key findings from 14 papers include the importance of communication and information sharing, as well as new ways of using virtual communication. Restrictive visiting practices were understood, but the impact of these restrictions on family experience cannot be underestimated, causing distress and suffering. Consistent advice and information were critical, such as explaining personal protective equipment, which family found constraining and staff experienced as affecting interpersonal communication. Cultural expectations of family caregiving were challenged during infectious disease outbreaks.

CONCLUSION

Learning from previous infectious disease outbreaks about how family are supported can be translated to the current COVID-19 pandemic and future infectious disease outbreaks. Consistent, culturally sensitive and tailored plans should be clearly communicated to family members, including when any restrictions may be amended or additional supports provided when someone is dying.

The effect of multidrug-resistant organisms on social participation and quality of life in children with life-limiting conditions

BACKGROUND

Children with life-limiting conditions have a high risk of colonisation with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO). To avoid the spread of hospital-aquired infections to other patients, children with a MDRO are moved to an isolated room or ward. However, such isolation prevents social participation, which may reduce the child's quality of life (QoL). To overcome this challenge of conflicting interests on a paediatric palliative care inpatient unit, a hygiene concept for patients colonised with MDRO, called PALLINI, was implemented. PALLINI advises that, instead of isolating the affected children, strict barrier nursing should be used.

AIM

To identify the impact of a complex hygiene concept on children's and parents' QoL and social participation.

METHODS

Cross-sectional mixed-methods research approach, comprising semi-structured interviews with parents and staff members, and a QoL-questionnaire focusing on the child which was completed by parents.

FINDINGS

In paediatric patients with life-limiting conditions who have MDRO colonisation, using a complex hygiene protocol resulted in both benefits and barriers to social participation. However, the child's QoL did not appear to be affected.

CONCLUSION

All staff members and families have to be familiar with the hygiene concept and the concept has to be self-explanatory and easy to apply.

Antimicrobial use at the end of life: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To examine antibiotic use in patients approaching end of life, in terms of frequency of prescription, aim of treatment, beneficial and adverse effects and contribution to the development of antimicrobial resistance.

DESIGN

Scoping review DATA SOURCES: An information scientist searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, The Cochrane library, PubMed Clinical Queries, NHS Evidence, Epistemonikos, SIGN, NICE, Google Scholar from inception to February 2019 for any study design including, but not limited to, randomised clinical trials, prospective interventional or observational studies, retrospective studies and qualitative studies. The search of Ovid MEDLINE was updated on the 10 June 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting antibiotic use in patients approaching end of life in any setting and clinicians' attitudes and behaviour in relation to antibiotic prescribing in this population DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers screened studies for eligibility; two reviewers extracted data from included studies. Data were analysed to describe antibiotic prescribing patterns across different patient populations, the benefits and adverse effects (for individual patients and wider society), the rationale for decision making and clinicians behaviours and attitudes to treatment with antibiotics in this patient group.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight studies were included. Definition of the end of life is highly variable as is use of antibiotics in patients approaching end of life. Prescribing decisions are influenced by patient age, primary diagnosis, care setting and therapy goals, although patients' preferences are not always documented or adhered to. Urinary and lower respiratory tract infections are the most commonly reported indications with outcomes in terms of symptom control and survival variably reported. Small numbers of studies reported on adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians sometimes feel uncomfortable discussing antibiotic treatment at end of life and would benefit from guidelines to direct care.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of antibiotics in patients approaching the end of life is common although there is significant variation in practice. There are a myriad of intertwined biological, ethical, social, medicolegal and clinical issues associated with the topic.

Evaluating the implementation of national recommendations on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms in end-of-life care

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, a national recommendation on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms (MDRO) in end-of-life care was published. In order to monitor the implementation in a hospital-based palliative care unit, a dedicated multidisciplinary working group on MDRO was established. It developed a standard operating procedure and a documentation template (checklist). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the implementation status after one year.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was selected. The status of implementation was identified through a survey among staff members. A retrospective routine data analysis was performed. A focus group discussion with members of the working group focused on previous steps, factors conducive to implementation and on remaining problems.

RESULTS

Almost all (18 out of 20) participants (20 out of 29 eligible staff members) knew the national recommendations. Twelve out of 27 recommendations had a high degree of implementation after one year, another 13 recommendations were seen as at least partly integrated into daily routine. For two recommendations the degree of implementation was rated low: (i) "Taking into account any additional time constraint imposed by protection and isolation measures when planning for personnel and bed occupancy", and (ii) "Facilitating the patient's ability to distinguish and recognize team members and family caregivers". Working group members reported improvements since the implementation, whilst reporting some uncertainty prevailing among both staff members and visitors. Inhibitory factors were said to include the complexity of the standard operating procedure, inadequate usage and poor usability of the checklist. Behavioural and cognitive barriers such as anxieties related to transmission and the sense of security caused by the routine use of protective clothing were considered to be strong. Improving the checklist and the standard operating procedure as well as anchoring procedures in daily routine were considered to be the next important steps.

DISCUSSION

The implementation of recommendations is an iterative process and requires the ongoing development of appropriate measures for implementation in the respective institution. A multidisciplinary working group with monitoring tasks is an advantage.

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an important health care issue. Patients in Western societies often present an increased morbidity of chronic conditions accompanied by poor immune status and the use of devices. In particular, patients in palliative care (PC) are at greater risk of MDRO colonization, due to accompanying special devices and being hospitalized. Objective: To gain an overview of the literature regarding MDROs in PC. Design: Systematic review Data sources: On the 19th of October 2019 the databases " PubMed" and " CINAHL" were used to identify studies reporting on MDROs in PC; the search was updated on 16th of May 2020. Results: Seventeen out of 486 articles were included. Six represent qualitative data, 10 quantitative data, and one a mixed methods approach. Prevalence data range from 4.0% to 18%. MDRO colonization has a negative impact on patients and families. It leads to uncertainties and higher workload by staff members. Strategies for the management of MDROs in the field of PC are predominantly available for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Not even half of institutions utilize existing protocols. Recommendations for dealing with MDROs indicate required staff and time resources as well as information, communication, and specific knowledge. Conclusion: There is a great need for studies examining the prevalence of all MDROs in the PC setting. Additionally, not only patients but also a public enlightenment on MDROs should be provided to decrease knowledge gaps and therefore reduce transmission on MDROs.

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms on palliative care patients in a university hospital-bound palliative care unit: A prospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant organisms are a growing challenge and burden to patient care. To date, there are only data concerning the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Thus, numbers of other multidrug-resistant organisms can only be extrapolated and inferred from more or less comparable cohorts.

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms on palliative care in-patients.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort analysis.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

A University Hospital-bound palliative care unit, in which all patients admitted to the unit were screened for inclusion.

RESULTS

In total, 304 patients were included in this study. The prevalence for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of 5.2% (95% confidence interval: 2.9%-8.4%), for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium of 10.5% (95% confidence interval: 7.2%-14.8%), for Ciprofloxacin-resistant-extended spectrum beta-lactamases isolates of 5.8% (95% confidence interval: 3.4%-9.3%) and Ciprofloxacin-resistant Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria of 0.3% (95% confidence interval: 0%-1.3%) was calculated. Except for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, patients carrying a multidrug-resistant organism had a significant longer duration of hospitalization. Median length of stay was 12 days (interquartile range: 14.5, no multidrug-resistant organisms), 14.5 days (interquartile range: 15, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), 21 days (interquartile range: 16.5, vancomycin-resistant enterococci), 22 days (interquartile range: 20.75, Ciprofloxacin-resistant-extended spectrum beta-lactamases) and 32 days (interquartile range: 22.00) for patients carrying two organisms.

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of all multidrug-resistant organisms within the hospitalized palliative care patients. However, the multidrug-resistant organisms do not seem to impact the survival within this cohort. Further studies should evaluate additional end-points, for example, quality of life, which are of special interest in this cohort.

A Linguistic Model of Communication Types in Palliative Medicine: Effects of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Colonization or Infection and Isolation Measures in End of Life on Family Caregivers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices

Background: This study examines communication profiles and associated attitudes toward health care professionals in interviews with family caregivers of hospitalized patients with confirmed multidrug-resistant organisms (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or multiresistant gram-negative bacteria) diagnosis at the end of life. Objectives: This study aims to replicate and complement findings from a previous investigation using a different methodological framework. The benefits of linguistic research in medical contexts are highlighted. Design: Fifty interviews with family caregivers were analyzed linguistically. The considered parameters include lexical choices such as evaluative wording, metaphors, and specialized terminology, as well as higher level categories-turn-taking, sentence-length, and personal deixis. These characteristics serve to assess attitudes toward medical staff, hygiene measures, knowledge, and its transfer and general emotional states. Conclusions: Linguistic expertise adds benefits to the classical analysis of language data as used in social sciences. Family caregivers' linguistic and attitudinal profiles vary depending on whether their involvement in the overall situation is active or passive, and whether their relationship toward staff and hospital is cooperative or confrontative. Depending on the four possible combinations of those characteristics, different recommendations for communication strategies on the staff's side can be given. In all cases, clear and patient/family centeredness are considered beneficial.

Multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms (MDRO) in end-of-life care: development of recommendations for hospitalized patients using a mixed-methods approach

PURPOSE

Palliative care professionals are frequently confronted with patients colonized or infected with MDRO. One major challenge is how to balance necessary isolation measures and social inclusion as one of the main principles of palliative and end-of-life care. To date, MDRO-specific policies and protocols vary widely between institutions.

AIM

provide empirical recommendations on how to deal with hospitalized MDRO patients in end-of-life care.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed based on (i) initial results of face-to-face interviews and focus groups, (ii) impartial experts' comments and consensus on the draft via online survey and (iii) a face-to-face meeting with consortium members to finalize recommendations. Findings of 158 interviews and six focus groups (39 participants) with patients, family caregivers, staff members and institutional stakeholders contributed to the recommendations. The assessments of 17 experts were considered.

RESULTS

In total, 21 recommendations were approved. The recommended strategy in dealing with MDRO at the end of life allows case-based application of protection and isolation measures. MDRO diagnostics and therapy involve screening at admission. The recommendations suggest consideration of required accommodation facilities, provided material as well as staff and time resources. The recommendations further highlight the importance of providing for strategies enabling the patient's social inclusion and provision of verbal and written information about MDRO for patients and family caregivers, transparent medical documentation, and staff member training.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations summarize the perspectives of individuals and groups affected by MDRO at the end of life and provide practical guidance for clinical routine. Further dissemination and implementation requirements are discussed and should contain the evaluation of the knowledge, views, worries, and anxieties of the target groups.

Burden and Management of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Palliative Care

Palliative care includes comprehensive strategies to optimize quality of life for patients and families confronting terminal illness. Infections are a common complication in terminal illness, and infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are particularly challenging to manage in palliative care. Limited data suggest that palliative care patients often harbor MDRO. When MDROs are present, distinguishing colonization from infection is challenging due to cognitive impairment or metastatic disease limiting symptom assessment and the lack of common signs of infection. Multidrug-resistant organisms also add psychological burden through infection prevention measures including patient isolation and contact precautions which conflict with the goals of palliation. Moreover, if antimicrobial therapy is indicated per goals of care discussions, available treatment options are often limited, invasive, expensive, or associated with adverse effects that burden patients and families. These issues raise important ethical considerations for managing and containing MDROs in the palliative care setting.

Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a palliative care unit: A prospective single service analysis

BACKGROUND

The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms is a particular challenge for the health care systems. Little is known about the occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) in patients of palliative care units (PCU).

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to determine the carriage of MRSA among patients of a PCU at a German University Hospital and to assess whether the positive cases would have been detected by a risk-factor-based screening-approach.

DESIGN

Between February 2014 and January 2015 patients from our PCU were tested for MRSA carriage within 48 hours following admission irrespective of pre-existing risk factors. In addition, risk factors for MRSA colonization were assessed. Samples from the nostrils and, if applicable, from pre-existing wounds were analysed by standardized culture-based laboratory techniques for the presence of MRSA and of other bacteria and fungi. Results from swabs taken prior to admission were also recorded if available.

RESULTS

297 out of 317 patients (93.7%) fulfilled one or more MRSA screening criteria. Swabs from 299 patients were tested. The detection rate was 2.1% for MRSA. All MRSA cases would have been detected by a risk-factor-based screening-approach. Considering the detected cases and the results from swabs taken prior to admission, 4.1% of the patients (n = 13) were diagnosed with MRSA and 4.1% with MDRGNB (n = 13), including two patients with MRSA and MDRGNB (0.6%). The rate of MRSA carriage in PCU patients (4.1%) was elevated compared to the rate seen in the general cohort of patients admitted to our University Hospital (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

PCU patients have an increased risk to carry MRSA compared to other hospitalized patients. Although a risk factor-based screening is likely to detect all MRSA carriers amongst PCU patients, we rather recommend a universal screening to avoid the extra effort to identify the few risk factor-negative patients (<7%). As we did not perform a systematic MDRGNB screening, further studies are needed to determine the true prevalence of MDRGNB amongst PCU patients.