1
|
Richards AL, Vallejo J, Duan L, Dinsdale MP, Akiyama-Ciganek J, Arakelian A, Lee JS, Shen E, Nguyen HQ. Socioeconomic factors associated with uptake and satisfaction with a post-hospitalization meals benefit in Medicare Advantage. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:2460-2470. [PMID: 38551247 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kaiser Permanente Southern California began offering a 4-week supplemental benefit of home-delivered meals to Medicare Advantage members after discharge from a hospitalization for heart failure and other medical conditions in 2021. The purpose of this study is to explore the associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and food insecurity with patient uptake of and satisfaction with the meals. METHODS Data for this cross-sectional study were drawn from survey and electronic medical record data for members referred for the meals benefit (n = 6169) and linked to a hospitalization encounter (n = 2254) between January and December 2021. Uptake was assessed using vendor records; measures of socioeconomic status included the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and prior receipt of medical financial assistance (MFA) from the health system. Patients were invited to complete an email or phone survey about their satisfaction with the meals and food insecurity. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to examine the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and food insecurity with meals uptake and satisfaction. RESULTS Sixty-two percent of patients referred for the benefit accepted the meals (mean age: 79 ± 9, 59% people of color). While there was no significant relationship between NDI and meals uptake (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07, p = 0.77), patients who received prior MFA were more likely to accept the meals (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.16, p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of patients who completed the survey (23% response rate) reported that meals were very or extremely helpful. Patients with food insecurity (29% of survey respondents) were more likely to report that the meals were helpful for their recovery compared to food secure patients (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The home-delivered meals appeared to be particularly utilized by and helpful to patients with greater financial strain and/or food insecurity, suggesting that supplemental benefits could be more targeted toward addressing unmet needs of vulnerable adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L Richards
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Jessica Vallejo
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Lewei Duan
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mary P Dinsdale
- Kaiser Permanente Southern Califorina, West Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | - Janet S Lee
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Ernest Shen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Huong Q Nguyen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California, USA
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Simone B, Chouillard E, Podda M, Pararas N, de Carvalho Duarte G, Fugazzola P, Birindelli A, Coccolini F, Polistena A, Sibilla MG, Kruger V, Fraga GP, Montori G, Russo E, Pintar T, Ansaloni L, Avenia N, Di Saverio S, Leppäniemi A, Lauretta A, Sartelli M, Puzziello A, Carcoforo P, Agnoletti V, Bissoni L, Isik A, Kluger Y, Moore EE, Romeo OM, Abu-Zidan FM, Beka SG, Weber DG, Tan ECTH, Paolillo C, Cui Y, Kim F, Picetti E, Di Carlo I, Toro A, Sganga G, Sganga F, Testini M, Di Meo G, Kirkpatrick AW, Marzi I, déAngelis N, Kelly MD, Wani I, Sakakushev B, Bala M, Bonavina L, Galante JM, Shelat VG, Cobianchi L, Mas FD, Pikoulis M, Damaskos D, Coimbra R, Dhesi J, Hoffman MR, Stahel PF, Maier RV, Litvin A, Latifi R, Biffl WL, Catena F. The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients. World J Emerg Surg 2024; 19:18. [PMID: 38816766 PMCID: PMC11140935 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00537-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures. METHODS Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023. RESULTS The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared. CONCLUSIONS The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Villeneuve St Georges, Villeneuve St Georges, France.
- Department of General Minimally Invasive Surgery, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
- General Surgery Department, American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Elie Chouillard
- General Surgery Department, American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Unit of Emergency Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | | | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Polistena
- Department of Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I Roma, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Sibilla
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vitor Kruger
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Emanuele Russo
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Tadeja Pintar
- UMC Ljubljana and Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- New Zealand Blood Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Avenia
- Endocrine Surgical Unit - University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Unit, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, AST Ascoli Piceno, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Division of Emergency Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Lauretta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico Di Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- Department of General Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- Dipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia e Odontoiatria, Campus Universitario di Baronissi (SA) - Università di Salerno, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Bissoni
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Arda Isik
- Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Bronson Methodist Hospital/Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Dieter G Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital and The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Edward C T H Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ciro Paolillo
- Emergency Department, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Fernando Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, 80246, USA
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Sganga
- Department of Geriatrics, Ospedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanna Di Meo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ingo Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicola déAngelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | | | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Government Gousia Hospital, DHS, Srinagar, India
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Vishal G Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Novena, Singapore
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Unit of General Surgery I, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Collegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Łodz, Poland
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
- Collegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Łodz, Poland
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- Department of Surgical Science, Unit of Emergency Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Jugdeep Dhesi
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Red Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Surgical Palliative Care Society, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Philip F Stahel
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, University Clinic, Gomel, Belarus
| | - Rifat Latifi
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Abrazo Health West Campus, Goodyear, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fakhry SM, Carrick MM, Hoffman MR, Shen Y, Garland JM, Wyse RJ, Watts DD. Hospice and palliative care utilization in 16 004 232 medicare claims: comparing trauma to surgical and medical inpatients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9:e001329. [PMID: 38646618 PMCID: PMC11029464 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Hospice and palliative care (PC) utilization is increasing in geriatric inpatients, but limited research exists comparing rates among trauma, surgical and medical specialties. The goal of this study was to determine whether there are differences among these three groups in rates of hospice and PC utilization. Methods Patients from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Standard Analytical Files for 2016-2020 aged ≥65 years were analyzed. Patients with a National Trauma Data Standard-qualifying ICD-10 injury code with abbreviated injury score ≥2 were classified as 'trauma'; the rest as 'surgical' or 'medical' using CMS MS-DRG definitions. Patients were classified as having PC if they had an ICD-10 diagnosis code for PC (Z51.5) and as hospice discharge (HD) if their hospital disposition was 'hospice' (home or inpatient). Use proportions for specialties were compared by group and by subgroups with increasing risk of poor outcome. Results There were 16M hospitalizations from 1024 hospitals (9.3% trauma, 26.3% surgical and 64.4% medical) with 53.7% women, 84.5% white and 38.7% >80 years. Overall, 6.2% received PC and 4.1% a HD. Both rates were higher in trauma patients (HD: 3.6%, PC: 6.3%) versus surgical patients (HD: 1.5%, PC: 3.0%), but lower than in medical patients (HD: 5.2%, PC: 7.5%). PC rates increased in higher risk patient subgroups and were highest for inpatient HD. Conclusions In this large study of Medicare patients, HD and PC rates varied significantly among specialties. Trauma patients had higher HD and PC utilization rates than surgical, but lower than medical. The presence of comorbidities, frailty and/or severe traumatic brain injury (in addition to advanced age) may be valuable criteria in selection of trauma patients for hospice and PC services. Further studies are needed to inform the most efficient use of hospice and PC resources, with particular focus on both timing and selection of subgroups most likely to benefit from these valuable yet limited resources. Level of evidence Level III, therapeutic/care management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir M Fakhry
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Yan Shen
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeneva M Garland
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ransom J Wyse
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Dorraine D Watts
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Zyl C, O'Riordan DL, Kerr KM, Harris HA. Doing More with the Same: Comparing Public and Private Hospital Palliative Care within California. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1064-1071. [PMID: 35085457 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Public and private hospitals treat different patient populations, which may impact resources to deliver palliative care (PC). Objectives: Compare public and private hospital PC service structures, processes, and treatment outcomes. Design: Retrospective data analysis of the Palliative Care Quality Network between 2018 and 2019. Settings/Subjects: Six public and 40 private California hospitals provided PC consultations to 4244 and 38,354 adults, respectively. Measurements: PC team and patient characteristics, care processes, and treatment outcomes. Results: Public and private hospital PC services had similar full-time equivalent/100 beds (1.2 vs. 1.4, p = 0.4). Public hospital patients were younger (65.2 vs. 73.5, p < 0.001), less likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasian (22.5% vs. 57.5%, p < 0.001), or English speaking (51.1% vs. 79.9%, p < 0.001). Public hospital patients had more moderate/severe pain (21.3% vs. 19.3, p < 0.03), anxiety (12.4% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), nausea (6.5% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), and dyspnea (11.0% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). Both hospitals equally improved pain (70.9% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.83) and nausea (82.0% vs. 87.6%, p = 0.09), but public hospitals were less effective at improving anxiety (67.3% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.002) and dyspnea (58.4% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.05). Although there was no difference in hospital length of stay (public = 10.2 days vs. private = 9.5 days, p = 0.07), public hospitals conducted more patient visits (2.6 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001). They also more often clarified code status (87.7% vs. 84.4%, p < 0.001) and surrogate decision maker (94.9% vs. 89.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Public hospital PC teams treat a more diverse symptomatic population. Yet, they achieved comparable outcomes with similar staffing to private hospitals. These findings have important ramifications for policy makers and public institution leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carin van Zyl
- LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, Section of Palliative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David L O'Riordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Heather A Harris
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kutney-Lee A, Smith D, Griffin H, Kinder D, Carpenter J, Thorpe J, Murray A, Shreve S, Ersek M. Quality of end-of-life care for Vietnam-era Veterans: Implications for practice and policy. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION 2021; 9:100494. [PMID: 33992224 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In federal response to the aging population of Vietnam-era Veterans, Congress directed the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to create a pilot program to identify and develop best practices for improving hospice care for this population. A first step in VA's response was to identify whether the end-of-life (EOL) care needs and outcomes of Vietnam-era Veterans differed from previous generations. METHODS Using medical records and bereaved family surveys, we examined clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization, and EOL quality indicators for Vietnam-era Veterans who died in VA inpatient settings between fiscal year 2013-2017. Contemporaneous comparisons were made with World War II/Korean War-era Veterans. RESULTS Compared to prior generations, higher percentages of Vietnam-era Veterans had mental health/substance use diagnoses and disability. Similar percentages of family members in both groups reported that overall EOL care was excellent; however, post-traumatic stress disorder management ratings by families of Vietnam-era Veterans were significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS Although current VA EOL practices are largely meeting the needs of Vietnam-era Veterans, greater focus on mental health comorbidity, including post-traumatic stress disorder, Agent Orange-related conditions, and ensuring access to quality EOL care in the community is warranted. IMPLICATIONS Policymakers and healthcare professionals should anticipate more physical and mental health comorbidities among Veterans at EOL as Vietnam-era Veterans continue to age. Findings are being used to inform the development of standardized EOL care protocols and training programs for non-VA healthcare providers that are tailored to the needs of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Kutney-Lee
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hilary Griffin
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Kinder
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joan Carpenter
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Thorpe
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Murray
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott Shreve
- Hospice and Palliative Care Program, Department of Veterans Affairs, Lebanon VA Medical Center, Lebanon, PA, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center (VEC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Webber C, Chan R, Scott M, Brown C, Spruin S, Hsu AT, Bush SH, Isenberg SR, Quinn K, Scott J, Tanuseputro P. Delivery of Palliative Care in Acute Care Hospitals: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Describing the Level of Involvement and Timing of Inpatient Palliative Care in the Last Year of Life. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:1000-1010. [PMID: 33337265 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Much end-of-life care is provided in hospital, yet little is known about the delivery of palliative care during end-of-life hospitalizations. Objectives: To characterize the level of palliative care involvement across hospitalizations in the last year of life. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study of adults in Ontario, Canada, who died between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2017, and had at least one acute care hospitalization in their last year of life. Using linked administrative health data, we developed a hierarchy of inpatient palliative care involvement reflecting the degree to which care was delivered with palliative intent. This hierarchy was based on palliative care diagnosis and service provider codes on hospitalization records and physician claims. We examined variations in the level of palliative care involvement across key patient characteristics. Results: In the last year of life, 65.1% of hospitalizations had no indication of palliative care involvement, 16.7% had a low level of involvement, 13.5% had a medium level of involvement, and 4.7% had a high level of involvement. Most hospitalizations with palliative care involvement (85.6%) occurred in the two months before death. Compared to patients who received no inpatient palliative care, patients who received a high level of palliative care involvement tended to be younger, died of cancer, resided in urban or lower income neighborhoods, and had fewer chronic conditions. Discussion: While many hospitalizations occurred in the last year of life, the majority did not involve palliative care, and very few had a high level of palliative care involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Webber
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raphael Chan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Scott
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Brown
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Spruin
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy T Hsu
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shirley H Bush
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kieran Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Scott
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|