Impact of Immigrant Status on Aggressive Medical Care Counter to Patients' Values Near Death among Advanced Cancer Patients

Disparities in advance care planning among older US immigrants

BACKGROUND

Despite known racial disparities in advance care planning (ACP), little is known about ACP disparities experienced by US immigrants.

METHODS

We used data from the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study. We defined ACP engagement as self-reported end-of-life (EOL) discussions, designation of a power of attorney (DPOA), documented living will, or "any" of the three behaviors. Immigration status was determined by respondent-reported birth outside the United States. Time in the United States was calculated by subtracting the year of arrival in the United States from the survey year of 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the association between ACP engagement and immigration status and the relationship of acculturation to ACP engagement, adjusting for sociodemographics, religiosity, and life expectancy.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort (N = 9928), 10% were immigrants; 45% of immigrants identified as Hispanic. After adjustment, immigrants had significantly lower adjusted probability of any ACP engagement (immigrants: 74% vs. US-born: 83%, p < 0.001), EOL discussions (67% vs. 77%, p < 0.001), DPOA designation (50% vs. 59%, p = 0.001) and living will documentation (50% vs. 56%, p = 0.03). Among immigrants, each year in the United States was associated with a 4% increase in the odds of any ACP engagement (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), ranging from 36% engaged 10 years after immigration to 78% after 70 years.

CONCLUSION

ACP engagement was lower for US immigrants compared to US-born older adults, particularly for those that recently immigrated. Future studies should explore strategies to reduce disparities in ACP and the unique ACP needs among different immigrant populations.

Trends in quality indicators of end-of-life care for women with gynecologic malignancies in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

A large body of research has validated several quality indicators of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care, but few have examined these in gynecologic cancer at a population-level. We examined patterns of EOL care quality in patients with gynecologic cancers across 13 years in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of gynecologic cancer decedents in Ontario from 2006 to 2018 using linked administrative health care databases. Proportions of quality indices were calculated, including: emergency department (ED) use, hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, chemotherapy ≤14 days of death, cancer-related surgery, tube or intravenous feeds, palliative home visits, and hospital death. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with receipt of aggressive and supportive care.

RESULTS

There were 16,237 included decedents over the study period; hospital death rates decreased from 47% to 37%, supportive care use rose from 65% to 74%, and aggressive care remained stable (16%). Within 30 days of death, 50% were hospitalized, 5% admitted to ICU, and 67% accessed palliative homecare. Within 14 days of death, 31% visited the ED and 4% received chemotherapy. Patients with vulvovaginal cancers received the lowest rates of aggressive and supportive care. Using multivariable analyses, factors associated with increased aggressive EOL care use included younger age, shorter disease duration, lower income quintiles, and rural residence.

CONCLUSIONS

Over time, less women dying with gynecologic cancers in Ontario experienced death in hospital, and more accessed supportive care. However, the majority were still hospitalized and a significant proportion received aggressive care in the final 30 days of life.

End-of-Life Health Resource Utilization for Limited English-Proficient Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE:

Limited English-proficient (LEP) patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may receive less palliative care services and more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life (EoL) care. Goals of this retrospective cohort study are to compare access to community palliative home care (CPHC), do not resuscitate (DNR) form completion, place of death, and health resource utilization at EoL between English-proficient (EP) and LEP patients with NSCLC in Vancouver, Canada.

METHODS:

All patients with advanced NSCLC referred in 2016 and received medical care were included. Patients were classified as LEP if seen with a medical interpreter. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS:

One hundred eighty-six patients were referred, 66% EP. Rates of CPHC referral and DNR form completion were the same for both groups (84% and 92%, P = 1.00). LEP patients received earlier access to CPHC (15 v 10 weeks before death, P = .039). Rates of ER visits within 6 months and 30 days of death were 0.89 for EP patients and 0.7 for LEP patients, P = .374, and 0.1 for EP patients and 0.13 for LEP patients, P = .244. Hospitalization rates within 6 months and 30 days of death were 1.4 for EP patients and 1.59 for LEP patients, P = .640, and 0.67 for EP patients and 0.81 for LEP patients, P = .091. EP patients were more likely to have a home death (26% v 14%), whereas LEP patients died in acute care (23% v 14%) or a tertiary palliative care unit (24% v 19%). This was not statistically significant ( P = .335). LEP patients had better median overall survival (8.5 v 5.4 months, P < .001), but when controlled by age, mutation, and EP status, only receipt of palliative-intent systemic therapy was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION:

EP and LEP patients with NSCLC have similar referral rates to CPHC, DNR form completion, and EoL health resource utilization. The measured EoL variables did not demonstrate significant disparities between EP and LEP patients.

Association between immigrant status and advanced cancer patients' location and quality of death

Background

Cancer patients often prefer to die at home, a location associated with better quality of death (QoD). Several studies demonstrate disparities in end‐of‐life care among immigrant populations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate how immigrant status affects location and quality of death among patients with advanced cancer in the United States.

Methods

Data were derived from Coping with Cancer, a federally funded multi‐site prospective study of advanced cancer patients and caregivers. The sample of patients who died during the study period was weighted (N_w = 308) to reduce statistically significant differences between immigrant (N_w = 49) and nonimmigrant (N_w = 259) study participants. Primary outcomes were location of death, death at preferred location, and poor QoD.

Results

Analyses adjusted for covariates indicated that patients who were immigrants were more likely to die in a hospital than home (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65–6.71) and less likely to die where they preferred (AOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20–0.90). Furthermore, immigrants were more likely to have poor QoD (AOR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.70–11.08).

Conclusions

Immigrants, as compared to nonimmigrants, are more likely to die in hospital settings, less likely to die at their preferred location, and more likely to have poor QoD.

Lay summary

Cancer patients typically prefer to die in their own homes, which is associated with improved quality of death.

However, disparities in end‐of‐life care among immigrant populations in the United States remain significant.

Our study found that immigrants are less likely to die in their preferred locations and more likely to die in hospital settings, resulting in poorer quality of death.

Disparities in end‐of‐life care and quality of death are prevalent among immigrants. The findings of this study illustrate that immigrants in the United States are more likely to die in hospital settings and less likely to die at their preferred location.

Comparison of End-of-Life Care Between Recent Immigrants and Long-standing Residents in Ontario, Canada

IMPORTANCE

Recent immigrants face unique cultural and logistical challenges that differ from those of long-standing residents, which may influence the type of care they receive at the end of life.

OBJECTIVE

To compare places of care among recent immigrants and long-standing residents in Canada in the last 90 days of life.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative data on individuals from Ontario, Canada, who died between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, extracted on February 26, 2020. Individuals were categorized by immigration status: recent immigrants (since 1985) and long-standing residents. Data were analyzed from December 27, 2019, to February 26, 2020.

EXPOSURES

All decedents who immigrated to Canada between 1985 and 2016 were classified as recent immigrants. Subgroup analyses assessed the association of region of origin.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was place of care, including institutional and noninstitutional settings, in the last 90 days of life. Descriptive statistics were used to compare characteristics and health service utilization among recent immigrants and long-standing residents. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate ratios (RR) of using acute care and long-term care in the last 90 days of life.

RESULTS

A total of 376 617 deceased individuals (median [IQR] age, 80 [68-88] years; 187 439 [49.8%] women and 189 178 [50.2%] men) were identified, among whom 22 423 (6.0%) were recent immigrants; recent immigrants were younger than long-standing residents (median [IQR] age, 76 [60-85] years vs 81 [69-88] years; P < .001), more likely to be living in lower income neighborhoods (12 357 immigrants [55.1%] vs 166 017 long-standing residents [46.9%] in the lower 2 income quintiles; P < .001), and had a higher Charlson Index score (score ≥5, 6294 immigrants [28.1%] vs 74 809 long-standing residents [21.1%]; P < .001). In the last 90 days of life, recent immigrants spent more days in intensive care units than long-standing residents (mean [SD], 2.64 [8.73] days vs 1.47 [5.70] days; P < .001), while long-standing residents spent more days using long-term care than recent immigrants (mean [SD], 19.49 [35.81] days vs 10.45 [27.42] days; P < .001). Being a recent immigrant was associated with a greater likelihood of acute inpatient care use (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.24) and lower likelihood of long-term care use (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.70), after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that at the end of life, recent immigrants were significantly more likely to receive inpatient and intensive care unit services and die in acute care settings compared with long-standing residents. Further research is needed to examine differences in care preference and disparities for immigrant groups of different origins.

Association between end-of-life cancer care and immigrant status: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To compare recent immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario, Canada, on established health service quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based cohort study of cancer decedents between 2004 and 2015.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

We grouped 13 085 immigrants who arrived in Ontario in 1985 or later into eight major ethnic groups based on birth country, mother tongue and surname, and compared them to 229 471 long-term residents who were ≥18 years at the time of death.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Aggressive care, defined as a composite of ≥2 emergency department visits, ≥2 new hospitalisations or an intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death; and supportive care, defined as a physician house call within 2 weeks, or palliative nursing or personal support worker home visit within 6 months of death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between immigration status and the odds of each main outcome.

RESULTS

Compared with long-term residents, immigrants overall and by ethnic group had higher rates of aggressive care (13.7% vs 17.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Among immigrants, Southeast Asians had the highest use while White-Eastern and Western Europeans had the lowest. Supportive care use was similar between long-term residents and immigrants (50.0% vs 50.5%, respectively; p=0.36), though lower among Southeast Asians (46.6%) and higher among White-Western Europeans (55.6%). After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities, immigrants remained more likely than long-term residents to receive aggressive care (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.21), yet were less likely to receive supportive care (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Among cancer decedents in Ontario, immigrants are more likely to use aggressive healthcare services at the end of life than long-term residents, while supportive care varies by ethnicity. Contributors to variation in end-of-life care require further study.

Perceptions of palliative care in a South Asian community: findings from an observational study

BACKGROUND

Patients often view "palliative care" (PC) as an approach that is synonymous with end-of-life and death, leading to shock and fear. Differing cultural and social norms and religious affiliations greatly determine perception of PC among diverse populations.

METHODS

This prospective observational study aimed to explore perceptions of PC among South Asian community members at one Canadian site. Patients who identified themselves as being of South Asian origin were consented and enrolled at a PC Clinic at a community hospital in Brampton, Ontario serving a large South Asian population. Participants filled out an 18-question survey created for the study and responded to a semi-structured interview consisting of 8 questions that further probed their perceptions of PC. Survey responses and semi-structured interviews content were analyzed by four authors who reached consensus on key exploratory findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-four participants of South Asian origin were recruited (61.8% males), and they were distributed by their age group as follows: [(30-49) - 18%; (50-64) - 21%; (65-79) - 41%; (≥ 80) - 21%]. Five main exploratory findings emerged: (i) differing attitudes towards talking about death; (ii) the key role of family in providing care; (iii) a significant lack of prior knowledge of PC; (iv) a common emphasis on the importance of alleviating suffering and pain to maintain comfort; and (v) that cultural values, faith, or spiritual belief do not pose a necessary challenge to acceptance of PC services.

CONCLUSIONS

Observations from this study provide a source of reference to understand the key findings and variability in perceptions of palliative care in South Asian communities. Culturally competent interventions based on trends observed in this study could assist Palliative Physicians in delivering personalized care to South Asian populations.

Advance Care Planning Engagement and End-of-life Preference Among Older Chinese Americans: Do Family Relationships and Immigrant Status Matter?

Objectives

To examine how immigrant status and family relationships are associated with advance care planning (ACP) engagement and end-of-life (EOL) preference in burial planning among older Chinese Americans, the largest subgroup of Asian Americans.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting

Communities in Honolulu, Hawai'i.

Participants

Participants were 430 older Chinese Americans aged 55 years and older.

Measures

Measures included ACP contemplation, ACP discussion, and EOL preference in burial planning, immigrant status, family cohesion, family conflict, demographic information, and health status.

Results

Results show that in comparison to foreign-born Chinese Americans, US-born Chinese Americans were more likely to have ACP contemplation [odds ratio (OR) 2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-5.63], ACP discussion (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.50-6.08), and preferences for burial plans at the end of life (OR 4.56, 95% CI 2.04-10.18). Family conflict increased the possibility of having ACP contemplation (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.38), ACP discussion (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39), and EOL preference in burial planning (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.42), whereas family cohesion was not associated with these study outcomes.

Conclusions and Implications

This study suggests that ACP should be adapted to be more culturally appropriate, especially in a time of coronavirus and xenophobia, such as framing ACP as a tool to help families reduce stress while fulfilling filial obligations, in order to ensure equitable access to ACP.