Challenges Associated with Anticipatory Medications in Rural and Remote Settings

Factors Influencing the Use and Demand of New Coronavirus Therapy Drugs Among the Adults During COVID-19 in China

Background

This alteration in the policy of COVID-19 resulted in widespread infections throughout China. Most people only need some antiviral drugs such as lopinavir/ritonavir or Chinese herbal preparations for treatment. In this context, the lack of drug knowledge and inadequate drug availability are evident. This study aims to explore the factors influencing drug use and demand during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Methods

This study used quota sampling based on gender, age, and place of residence to perform a cross-sectional survey on a sample of 771 adults. The researchers used chi-square tests to understand differences in drug use and demand across characteristics, and binary logistic regression to analyse the influencing factors.

Results

The study revealed that 85.9% of the participants used drugs following the COVID-19 infection. Participants with college and above, (OR=2.49, 95% CI=1.27-4.88) annual personal income between 30,000 and 80,000CNY (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.35-3.55) and over 80,000CNY (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.05-3.66) were more knowledgeable about using drugs. Gender, (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.50-0.95) age, (OR=2.11, 95% CI=1.15-3.88) residence, (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.06-2.37) chronic disease conditions (OR=0.46, 95% CI=0.27-0.78) and infection symptoms (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.38-0.93) as factors influencing the need for drug delivery services. (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Research has revealed that a significant proportion of infected people in China chose drug treatment during COVID-19. Individuals with severe symptoms use more medication and require more drug delivery and storage. Low-education and low-income populations are lacking in drug knowledge, and older adults with underlying medical conditions are more likely to need drug delivery services. Therefore, governments should prioritize vulnerable groups when formulating drug policies and target drug literacy and guidance. In addition, it is recommended that a drug distribution system be set up within the community so that those in need can have quick and easy access to drugs.

Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017

BACKGROUND

The anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review.

AIM

To review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance.

DESIGN

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

METHODS

Nine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent.

CONCLUSION

The evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42016052108.

Palliative Care Within the Primary Health Care Setting in Australia: A Scoping Review

Objectives: This scoping review identifies and details the scope of practice of health professionals who provide palliative care within the primary health setting in Australia.

Methods: A scoping review approach was conducted on the Cinahl (Ebsco), Scopus, Medline (Ovid) and PubMed databases to extract articles from 1 December 2015 to 1 December 2020. Broad text words and MeSH headings were used with relevance to palliative care, general practice, primary health, and community setting. Extracted journal articles were limited to those based on the Australian population or Australian health system.

Results: Eighty-four papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The review identified the following health professional roles within the Primary Health Care setting undertaking palliative care: General Practitioner, Nurse, Pharmacist, Paramedics, Carers, and Allied Health professionals.

Conclusion: This review offers a first understanding of the individual health professional roles and multidisciplinary team approach to actively providing palliative care within the Primary Health Care setting in Australia.

Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Palliative Care Access in Rural Areas: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Despite the growth of palliative care (PC), access to PC remains challenging for rural Americans living with chronic diseases. Given the demand and benefits of PC, a comprehensive view of PC access would inform policymakers in developing PC services in rural areas.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to PC access in rural areas from the voices of service users and service providers during the past decade.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was conducted from 2010 to 2020 using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases. Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Barriers to PC access in rural areas mostly arose in structural issues: (1) the inadequate knowledge and awareness of PC among both service users and providers and (2) the poorly structured PC system. Other barriers included communication gaps/challenges between providers and patients/families and cultural barriers. The facilitators mainly originated in patients/families' connectedness with local providers and with other social networks such as friends.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for funding support to increase provider competency, service availability and accessibility, and the public knowledge and awareness of PC in rural areas. A holistic and tailored PC model that standardizes care delivery, referral and coordination, including family caregiver support programs, can improve care access. Future practice and research are warranted to implement and evaluate innovative approaches, such as a coordinated community-based approach, to the successful integration of PC in rural communities.

Mapping end-of-life and anticipatory medications in palliative care patients using a longitudinal general practice database

OBJECTIVE

End-of-life and anticipatory medications (AMs) have been widely used in various health care settings for people approaching end-of-life. Lack of access to medications at times of need may result in unnecessary hospital admissions and increased patient and family distress in managing palliative care at home. The study aimed to map the use of end-of-life and AM in a cohort of palliative care patients through the use of the Population Level Analysis and Reporting Data Space and to discuss the results through stakeholder consultation of the relevant organizations.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of 799 palliative care patients in 25 Australian general practice health records with a palliative care referral was undertaken over a period of 10 years. This was followed by stakeholders' consultation with palliative care nurse practitioners and general practitioners who have palliative care patients.

RESULTS

End-of-life and AM prescribing have been increasing over the recent years. Only a small percentage (13.5%) of palliative care patients received medications through general practice. Stakeholders' consultation on AM prescribing showed that there is confusion about identifying patients needing medications for end-of-life and mixed knowledge about palliative care referral pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Improved knowledge and information around referral pathways enabling access to palliative care services for general practice patients and their caregivers are needed. Similarly, the increased utility of screening tools to identify patients with palliative care needs may be useful for health care practitioners to ensure timely care is provided.

Nursing education on palliative care across Europe: Results and recommendations from the EAPC Taskforce on preparation for practice in palliative care nursing across the EU based on an online-survey and country reports

BACKGROUND

Nurses are the largest regulated group of healthcare professionals involved in palliative care. In 2004, a taskforce of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) launched the 'Guide for development of palliative nurse education in Europe' (hereinafter, the EAPC 2004 Guide). No systematic evaluation of its impact in the development of palliative care education was undertaken.

AIMS

To describe current undergraduate and postgraduate nursing education across Europe; to identify the roles that nurses with different palliative care educational levels have in palliative care; and to assess the uptake of the EAPC 2004 Guide in the development of palliative care nursing in Europe.

DESIGN

Descriptive research involving an online survey among nursing experts, and the consultation of national representatives.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 135 nurses (52% response rate) from 25 countries completed the online survey; representatives from 16 countries were consulted.

RESULTS

In 14 (56%) countries, palliative care was not identified as a mandatory subject within undergraduate nursing education. The EAPC 2004 Guide is widely known and was/is being used in many countries to promote palliative care nursing education. Large variations were found across and within country responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care nursing education varies largely in Europe. The wide awareness and use of the EAPC 2004 Guide show how policy measures can influence the development of palliative care education. Recommendations are built and focus on both fostering the use of this guide and implementing policy measures to ensure that palliative care nursing is recognised and certified as a specialty in all European countries.

Mapping palliative and end of care research in Australia (2000–2018)

Objective

The objective of this study is to map the existent research undertaken in Australia into broad thematic areas and identify the characteristics of the studies and areas of future research in the literature.

Methods

A scoping review methodology was employed to map the current areas of research undertaken in Australia since January 2000 until the end of December 2018 according to years of publications, types of studies, populations studied, research themes, and areas of focus.

Results

Our review identified 1,405 Australian palliative care research publications between January 2000 and December 2018. Nearly 40% of the studies were quantitative (39%) and a third were qualitative studies (31%). The remainder of the studies were reviews, mixed methods, quality improvement projects, and others. One-third (30%) of the research was done with carers' participants followed by nurses (22%) and doctors and physicians (18%). The most frequently reported diagnosis in the studies was cancer with 42% of the publication total. The most frequently explored theme was physical symptoms (such as pain, breathlessness, nausea, delirium, and dyspnea) with a total of 16% of all articles followed by communication (15%). There was a large gap to the next most frequently explored theme with service delivery (9%) and coordination of care (8%). Assessment of patients (7%), end-of-life decision-making (6%), and rural/regional (6%) all produced a similar number of publications. Very few studies addressed topics such as quality of life, E-Health, after-hours care, spirituality, and health economics. Moreover, there were only 15 (1%) studies focused on the last days of life.

Significance of the results

The current review presented a comprehensive search of the literature across almost two decades in Australia in the palliative care setting. It has covered a breadth of research topics and highlighted urgent areas for further research.