1
|
Ziv A, Shaulov A, Rubin C, Oberman B, Tawil Y, Kaplan G, Velan B, Bodas M. The association of medical, social, and normative factors with the implementation of end-of-life care practices. Isr J Health Policy Res 2024; 13:3. [PMID: 38195649 PMCID: PMC10775651 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-024-00589-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life (EoL) care practices (EoLCP) are procedures carried out at the EoL and bear directly on this stage in the patient's life. Public support of these practices in Israel is far from uniform. Previous studies show that while ∼30% of participants support artificial respiration or feeding of terminally ill patients, 66% support analgesic treatment, even at the risk of shortening life. This study aimed to create a typology of six end-of-life care practices in Israel and assess the association of medical, social, and normative factors with the implementation of those practices. These practices included mechanical ventilation, artificial feeding, deep sedation, providing information to the patient and family caregivers, including family caregivers in EoL decision-making, and opting for death at home. METHODS This cross-sectional study was performed as an online survey of 605 adults aged 50 or more in Israel, of which ~ 50% (n = 297) reported supporting a dying terminally ill relative in the last 3 years. Participants were requested to provide their account of the EoL process of their relative dying from a terminal illness in several aspects, as well as the EoL care practices utilized by them. RESULTS The accounts of the 297 interviewees who supported a dying relative reveal a varied EoL typology. The utilization of end-of-life care practices was associated with the socio-normative beliefs of family caregivers but not with their socioeconomic status. Strong correlations were found between family caregiver support for three key practices (mechanical ventilation, artificial feeding, and family involvement in EoL) and the actual utilization of these practices in the care of dying patients. CONCLUSIONS The findings portray an important image of equity in the utilization of EoLCP in Israel, as the use of these practices was not associated with socioeconomic status. At the same time, the study found substantial diversity in family caregivers' preferences regarding EoL care practices use not related to socioeconomic status. We believe that differences in preferences that do not lead to problems with equity or other important societal values should be respected. Accordingly, policymakers and health system leaders should resist calls for legislation that would impose uniform EoL practices for all Israelis. Instead, they should take concrete steps to preserve and enhance the widespread current practice of practitioners to adapt EoL care to the varied needs and preferences of Israeli families and cultural, social, and religious subgroups. These steps should include providing frameworks and tools for family caregivers to support their loved ones close to their deaths, such as educational programs, seminars, supportive care before and during the end of life of their loved ones, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnona Ziv
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Adir Shaulov
- Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Carmit Rubin
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Bernice Oberman
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yoel Tawil
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Giora Kaplan
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Baruch Velan
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Moran Bodas
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, PO Box 39040, 6997801, Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yenson VM, Amgarth-Duff I, Brown L, Caperchione CM, Clark K, Cross A, Good P, Landers A, Luckett T, Philip J, Steer C, Vardy JL, Wong AK, Agar MR. Defining research priorities and needs in cancer symptoms for adults diagnosed with cancer: an Australian/New Zealand modified Delphi study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:436. [PMID: 37395859 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07889-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study asked consumers (patients, carers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to identify the most important symptoms for adults with cancer and potential treatment interventions. METHODS A modified Delphi study was conducted involving two rounds of electronic surveys based on prevalent cancer symptoms identified from the literature. Round 1 gathered information on participant demographics, opinions and/or experience on cancer symptom frequency and impact, and suggestions for interventions and/or service delivery models for further research to improve management of cancer symptoms. In Round 2, respondents ranked the importance of the top ten interventions identified in Round 1. In Round 3, separate expert panels of consumers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) attempted to reach consensus on the symptoms and interventions previously identified. RESULTS Consensus was reached for six symptoms across both groups: fatigue, constipation, diarrhoea, incontinence, and difficulty with urination. Notably, fatigue was the only symptom to reach consensus across both groups in Round 1. Similarly, consensus was reached for six interventions across both groups. These were the following: medicinal cannabis, physical activity, psychological therapies, non-opioid interventions for pain, opioids for breathlessness and cough, and other pharmacological interventions. CONCLUSIONS Consumers and HCPs prioritise differently; however, the symptoms and interventions that reached consensus provide a basis for future research. Fatigue should be considered a high priority given its prevalence and its influence on other symptoms. The lack of consumer consensus indicates the uniqueness of their experience and the need for a patient-centred approach. Understanding individual consumer experience is important when planning research into better symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M Yenson
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Cancer Symptom Trials (CST), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ingrid Amgarth-Duff
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Linda Brown
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Symptom Trials (CST), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cristina M Caperchione
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CST Management Advisory Committee, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine Clark
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Sydney Local Health District Supportive and Palliative Care Network, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrea Cross
- Consumer Advocate, Cancer Symptom Trials, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CST Scientific Advisory Committee, Cancer Symptoms Trials, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip Good
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Palliative and Supportive Care, Mater Misericordiae, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Mater Research - University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amanda Landers
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Tim Luckett
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CST Management Advisory Committee, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- CST Management Advisory Committee, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Palliative Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Palliative Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Steer
- CST Management Advisory Committee, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales Rural Clinical Campus, Albury-Wodonga, NSW, Australia
- Border Medical Oncology, Albury-Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury-Wodonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Janette L Vardy
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aaron K Wong
- CST Scientific Advisory Committee, Cancer Symptoms Trials, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Palliative Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Palliative Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Meera R Agar
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Symptom Trials (CST), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CST Management Advisory Committee, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CST Scientific Advisory Committee, Cancer Symptoms Trials, IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young J, Snelling J, Beaumont S, Diesfeld K, White B, Willmott L, Robinson J, Ahuriri-Driscoll A, Cheung G, Dehkhoda A, Egan R, Jap J, Karaka-Clarke TH, Manson L, McLaren C, Winters J. What do health care professionals want to know about assisted dying? Setting the research agenda in New Zealand. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:40. [PMID: 37038170 PMCID: PMC10084592 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01159-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New Zealand recently introduced law permitting terminally ill people to request and receive assisted dying (AD) in specified circumstances. Given the nature and complexity of this new health service, research is vital to determine how AD is operating in practice. OBJECTIVE To identify research priorities regarding the implementation and delivery of AD in New Zealand. METHODS Using an adapted research prioritisation methodology, the researchers identified 15 potential AD research topics. A mixed-methods survey of health professionals was undertaken where respondents were asked to rate the 15 topics according to the relative importance for research to be conducted on each issue. Respondents could also suggest additional research areas, and were invited to participate in a follow-up interview. RESULTS One hundred and nineteen respondents completed the survey. 31% had some experience with AD. The highest rated research topic was the 'effectiveness of safeguards in the Act to protect people'; the lowest rated topic was research into the 'experiences of non-provider (e.g., administrative, cleaning) staff where assisted dying is being provided'. Respondents suggested 49 other research topics. Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis of interview data and open-ended survey questions was undertaken. Six research themes were identified: general factors related to the wider health system; the experiences of health care providers at the bedside; medico-legal issues; the impact of AD; experiences on the day of dying; and the overall effectiveness of the AD system. Key issues for stakeholders included safety of the AD service; ensuring access to AD; achieving equity for 'structurally disadvantaged' groups; and ensuring the well-being of patients, families/whānau, providers and non-providers. CONCLUSIONS Based on early experiences of the implementation of the AD service, health professionals provide important insights into what research should be prioritised post-legalisation of AD. These findings can be used to shape the research agenda so that research may inform law, policy and best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Young
- Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | | | - Sophie Beaumont
- Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Kate Diesfeld
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ben White
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lindy Willmott
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Gary Cheung
- University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - James Jap
- Tōtara Hospice, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herbst FA, Gawinski L, Schneider N, Stiel S. 'She Can't Support Me Because She's so Old': A Mixed-Methods Study of Support Experiences and Needs in Adult Child-Parent Dyads at the End of Life. OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING 2023; 86:1371-1387. [PMID: 33853447 PMCID: PMC9902957 DOI: 10.1177/00302228211008748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about support experiences and needs in the dyads of (1) terminally ill adult children and their parent caregivers and (2) terminally ill parents and their adult child caregivers. The current study aimed at investigating the experiences and needs of adult children and parents in end of life situations regarding their provision and receipt of support. The study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, combining explorative qualitative interviews with the quantitative self-report Berlin Social Support Scales. Sixty-five patients (dyad 1: 19; dyad 2: 46) and 42 family caregivers (dyad 1: 13; dyad 2: 29) participated in the study (02/2018-11/2019). Results show that ill adult children felt less (well) supported than ill parents. Parent caregivers were often limited in the support they could provide, due to their age and health conditions. Hypotheses were deduced from patients' and family caregivers' notions to inform dyad-specific recommendations for support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska A. Herbst
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for General Practice, Hanover, Germany,Franziska A. Herbst, Hannover Medical School, Institute for General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Laura Gawinski
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for General Practice, Hanover, Germany
| | - Nils Schneider
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for General Practice, Hanover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for General Practice, Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Becker TD, Cagle JG. Priority Research Topics and Patient and Family Needs in a National Sample of Hospice Agencies. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:133-142. [PMID: 36328176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Various contextual factors surrounding hospice care have reinforced the need for scholars to pursue practice-relevant research questions. Although priority-setting is a primary approach to streamline such efforts, research appears yet to have conducted priority-setting with hospice professionals. OBJECTIVE To describe the areas of needed research and clinical focus voiced by a national probability sample of US hospice agency representatives. METHODS A national probability sample of 600 hospice agencies proportionately stratified by state and profit status was surveyed. At the end of the survey, participants indicated whether or not they were willing to answer two additional open-ended questions. These two questions requested participants' input on areas of needed attention related to (1) research topics and (2) unmet needs for patients and families. Responses were content analyzed. RESULTS A total of 317 surveys were completed (response rate = 61.8%). Viable responses were recorded by 129 participants responding to at least one item. Content analysis generated the following five categories (and various subcategories): earlier access to hospice, education (outside physicians, patients and families, public), policy barriers to hospice enrollment (hospice eligibility and reimbursement, gaps in insurance coverage), effects of policy restrictions on hospice care (reimbursement for care, pain management, clinician issues), and improving the provision of in-home hospice care (community resources, supports for caregivers, supports for when caregiver assistance is inadequate, needs already are being met). CONCLUSION These findings presented by hospice agency representatives reflect directions for research and clinical development. Efforts are needed to cohere professional- and patient-reported areas of needed attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd D Becker
- University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | - John G Cagle
- University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sangeorzan I, Andriopoulou P, Davies BM, McNair A. The information needs of people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: A qualitative study to inform patient education in clinical practice. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285334. [PMID: 37205664 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with lifelong illnesses need access to adequate information about their condition to make optimal health decisions. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common form of spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. Its chronic and debilitating nature, varied impact, clinical trajectory, and management options necessitate appropriate informational support to sustain effective clinical and self-directed care strategies. However, before clinicians can meet patients' information needs, they must first have an understanding of their baseline requirements. This study explores the information needs of people with DCM (PwCM). In doing so, it provides a starting point for the development of patient education and knowledge management strategies in clinical practice. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with PwCM were conducted using an interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach was used to analyse the data. Findings were reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. RESULTS Twenty PwCM (65% female, 35% male), with ages ranging from 39 to 74 years old participated in the interviews. The findings indicated that the provision of information to PwCM during clinical interactions varies. Accordingly, PwCM's information needs were broad-ranging, as was the nature of the information they found useful. Three main themes were identified (1) Variation in the provision of information to PwCM during clinical interactions, (2) Variations in the information needs of PwCM, and (3) Information that PwCM find useful. CONCLUSION Efforts must turn to adequately educating patients at the time of the clinical encounter. A comprehensive and consistent patient-centered information exchange in DCM is necessary to achieve this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benjamin M Davies
- Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Angus McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hudson PL, Gardiner C, Alvariza A, Nicholas Dionne-Odom J, Öhlén J, Carduff E, Harding R, Witkamp E, Payne S. Strategies and checklist for designing and conducting palliative care research with family carers: EAPC international expert elicitation study. Palliat Med 2023; 37:163-173. [PMID: 36380493 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221136162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care services seek to improve the wellbeing of family carers of people living with serious and life-limiting illness. To help achieve this goal, systematic reviews have recommended priority areas for family carer research and the need to improve the quality of study design. Policy makers have also advocated for enhanced family carer support. However, there are specific methodological considerations and challenges in designing and conducting carer research conducted during the course of the serious illness trajectory and in bereavement. AIM To develop strategies to improve the design and conduct of research with family carers. DESIGN Expert elicitation study using an adapted version of the 'Identify, Discuss, Estimate and Aggregate' elicitation protocol, supplemented with strategies from peer-reviewed literature. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Nine members of the management committee of the European Association for Palliative Care's Reference group on family carer research, comprising international senior research academics in family caregiving. RESULTS A compilation of recommended strategies and checklist was created to: (a) help researchers plan research involving family carers focussing on: preparation, conduct and dissemination and (b) assist ethics committees and funding bodies to evaluate proposals. CONCLUSIONS The strategies and checklist for conducting research with family carers may enhance methodologically rigorous research. Consequently, researchers, practitioners and policy makers will not only gain a more comprehensive understanding of the unmet needs of family carers but also promote the development of empirically sound interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P L Hudson
- Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Gardiner
- Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - A Alvariza
- Department of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Capio Palliative Care, Dalen Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - J Öhlén
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, and Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Palliative Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Västra Götaland Region, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Carduff
- Marie Curie Hospice Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - E Witkamp
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Care partner support. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 191:203-219. [PMID: 36599509 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824535-4.00014-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life of people living with serious illness and their family carers. However despite policy, clinical, and research evidence underpinning the importance of a family approach to care, as well as justification for early palliative care integration, systemic inadequacies have impeded the quality of family support. This chapter provides an overview of common concepts in caregiving, a framework through which carer well-being can be understood, and an overview of disease specific considerations for care partners. There are several main needs that are relevant to care partners across disease settings include (1) information and guidance to prepare them for the role; (2) how to alleviate discomfort for the person with illness; (3) enhancing skills for the physical tasks of the role; (4) strategies for managing the psychological, and financial implications of the care partner role; and (5) assistance in advance care planning and on preparing for the care recipient's death. Care partner coping is a result of complex interactions between stressors and mediators as they navigate chronic illness, but palliative providers with an understanding of these factors are well-positioned to address carer risk factors and provide appropriate support.
Collapse
|
9
|
Determining the Research Priorities for Adult Primary Brain Tumours in Australia and New Zealand: A Delphi Study with Consumers, Health Professionals, and Researchers. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9928-9955. [PMID: 36547195 PMCID: PMC9777470 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this project was to determine research priorities, barriers, and enablers for adult primary brain tumour research in Australia and New Zealand. Consumers, health professionals, and researchers were invited to participate in a two-phase modified Delphi study. Phase 1 comprised an initial online survey (n = 91) and then focus groups (n = 29) which identified 60 key research topics, 26 barriers, and 32 enablers. Phase 2 comprised two online surveys to (1) reduce the list to 37 research priorities which achieved consensus (>75% 2-point agreement) and had high mean importance ratings (n = 116 participants) and (2) determine the most important priorities, barriers, and enablers (n = 90 participants). The top ten ranked research priorities for the overall sample and sub-groups (consumers, health professionals, and researchers) were identified. Priorities focused on: tumour biology, pre-clinical research, clinical and translational research, and supportive care. Variations were seen between sub-groups. The top ten barriers to conducting brain tumour research related to funding and resources, accessibility and awareness of research, collaboration, and process. The top ten research enablers were funding and resources, collaboration, and workforce. The broad list of research priorities identified by this Delphi study, together with how consumers, health professionals, and researchers prioritised items differently, and provides an evidence-based research agenda for brain tumour research that is needed across a wide range of areas.
Collapse
|
10
|
Consensus-based recommendations for psychosocial support measures for parents and adult children at the end of life: results of a Delphi study in Germany. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:669-676. [PMID: 34363494 PMCID: PMC8636430 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06452-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The availability of psychosocial support measures has a significant impact on the quality of life of terminally ill and dying patients and the burden experienced by their relatives. To date, no intervention has specifically focused on promoting interaction within the dyads of the following: (1) terminally ill adult children and their parents and (2) terminally ill parents and their adult children. A national Delphi study was conducted to provide appropriate recommendations for dyadic psychosocial support measures. METHODS Recommendations were formulated from qualitative interview data on the experiences and wishes of patients and family caregivers within these two dyads. Experts from palliative and hospice care providers rated the relevance and feasibility of 21 recommendations on two 4-point Likert-type scales, respectively. Additional suggestions for improvement were captured via free text fields. Individual items were considered consented when ≥ 80% of participants scored 1 (strongly agree) or 2 (somewhat agree) regarding both relevance and feasibility. RESULTS A total of 27 experts (35% response rate) completed two Delphi rounds. Following the first round, 13 recommendations were adjusted according to participants' comments. After the second round, consensus was achieved for all 21 of the initially presented recommendations. CONCLUSION The Delphi-consented recommendations for parents and adult children at the end of life provide the first guidance for hands-on dyadic psychosocial support measures for parent-adult child relationships, specifically. The next step could involve the structured implementation of the recommendations, accompanied by scientific research. This study was registered on October 27, 2017, with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013206).
Collapse
|
11
|
van Eenennaam RM, Koppenol LS, Kruithof WJ, Kruitwagen-van Reenen ET, Pieters S, van Es MA, van den Berg LH, Visser-Meily JMA, Beelen A. Discussing Personalized Prognosis Empowers Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis to Regain Control over Their Future: A Qualitative Study. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11121597. [PMID: 34942899 PMCID: PMC8699408 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11121597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The ENCALS survival prediction model offers patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) the opportunity to receive a personalized prognosis of survival at the time of diagnosis. We explored experiences of patients with ALS, caregivers, and physicians with discussing personalized prognosis through interviews with patients and their caregivers, and in a focus group of physicians. Thematic analysis revealed four themes with seven subthemes; these were recognized by the focus group. First, tailored communication: physician’s communication style and information provision mediated emotional impact and increased satisfaction with communication. Second, personal factors: coping style, illness experiences, and information needs affected patient and caregiver coping with the prognosis. Third, emotional impact ranged from happy and reassuring to regret. Fourth, regaining control over the future: participants found it helpful in looking towards the future, and emphasized the importance of quality over quantity of life. Personalized prognosis can be discussed with minimal adverse emotional impact. How it is communicated—i.e., tailored to individual needs—is as important as what is communicated—i.e., a good or poor prognosis. Discussing personalized prognosis may help patients with ALS and their caregivers regain control over the future and facilitate planning of the future (care). For many patients, quality of life matters more than quantity of time remaining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remko M. van Eenennaam
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loulou S. Koppenol
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke J. Kruithof
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther T. Kruitwagen-van Reenen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sotice Pieters
- Basalt Rehabilitation, 2543 SW The Hague, The Netherlands;
| | - Michael A. van Es
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.A.v.E.); (L.H.v.d.B.)
| | - Leonard H. van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.A.v.E.); (L.H.v.d.B.)
| | - Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Beelen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-638-555-078
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Racine L, Ford H, Johnson L, Fowler-Kerry S. An integrative review of Indigenous informal caregiving in the context of dementia care. J Adv Nurs 2021; 78:895-917. [PMID: 34806198 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To appraise the empirical literature on the needs of Indigenous informal caregivers caring for people living with dementia in Indigenous communities. DESIGN Whittemore and Knafl's updated approach to integrative reviews, PRISMA guidelines, and CASP checklists for narrative analysis were followed. DATA SOURCES A systematic search of published empirical literature from January 2010 to August 2020 was undertaken in six databases. REVIEW METHODS Fifty-one studies met the research question and the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Five themes describe the findings: Decolonizing Western perspectives on dementia, the centrality of cultural safety, caregivers' experiences, pre-dementia community education and family and community-centred care emerged from the thematic analysis. Most of the studies used quantitative methodologies, and few studies were conducted using community-based approaches. CONCLUSION This review shows that Indigenous caregiving represents an emerging field in nursing and health sciences in a context of a global crisis. Researchers need to focus on Indigenous values and voices to adapt care and support informal caregivers. Our review emphasizes that working with Indigenous communities will likely translate into new care delivery models, policies and practices to support Indigenous informal caregivers and address the specific social determinants impacting caregivers' roles and tasks. IMPACT This review highlights the necessity of having community and family-based discussions on enhancing the delivery of dementia care for Indigenous peoples in Canada and worldwide. Decolonizing Western perspectives of dementia translate into culturally safe approaches that aim to integrate Indigenous cultural perspectives of holism, reciprocity, wisdom, respect of older people and relationality into nursing practice. The support of Indigenous informal caregivers requires future studies to address the stigmatizing Western views of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Racine
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Harris Ford
- College of Arts and Science, Department of History, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Letitia Johnson
- College of Arts and Science, Department of History, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Susan Fowler-Kerry
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bragança J, Martins L, Campos de Carvalho E, Vieira M, Caldeira S. End-of-life: An urgent update in nursing terminology. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2021; 18:e12439. [PMID: 34196489 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Although nursing terminologies and classifications represent nursing knowledge across diverse clinical areas, end-of-life care seems under represented in many aspects of these instruments. NANDA- I is an international nursing diagnostic classification widely used in nursing education and research. This taxonomy is based on seven axes, including the axis of time. In this commentary we bring discussion to the need to update nursing terminology by including the term end-of-life in the time axis of NANDA-I. After describing the epidemiologic aspects of end-of-life care and discussing the relevant nursing role, we discuss patients' and family's human responses towards the end-of-life time and circumstance, which are central to defining nursing diagnoses. End-of-life care is one priority in health care, and nursing diagnoses should represent that situation as well. This paper focuses on a specific and international nursing diagnosis classification, NANDA-I, which lacks an end-of-life component to its time axis for defining labels of nursing diagnoses. Attending to the importance of classifications in clinical reasoning, nursing diagnoses could better represent responses towards this health condition, opening new opportunities for increasing nursing roles in clinical practice, and also for new studies aiming to validate nursing diagnoses, and promoting an evidence-based practice by including end-of-life in the axis time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Bragança
- Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lurdes Martins
- School of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Margarida Vieira
- School of Nursing and Researcher at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sílvia Caldeira
- School of Nursing and Researcher at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shaw J, Kamphuis H, Sharpe L, Lebel S, Smith AB, Hulbert-Williams N, Dhillon HM, Butow P. Setting an International Research Agenda for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Online Delphi Consensus Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:596682. [PMID: 33692719 PMCID: PMC7938308 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common amongst cancer survivors. There is rapidly growing research interest in FCR but a need to prioritize research to address the most pressing clinical issues and reduce duplication and fragmentation of effort. This study aimed to establish international consensus among clinical and academic FCR experts regarding priorities for FCR research. Methods Members of the International Psycho-oncology Society (IPOS) Fear of Cancer Recurrence Special Interest Group (FORwards) were invited to participate in an online Delphi study. Research domains identified in Round 1 were presented and discussed at a focus group (Round 2) to consolidate the domains and items prior to presentation in further survey rounds (Round 3) aimed at gaining consensus on research priorities of international significance. Results Thirty four research items were identified in Round 1 and 33 of the items were consolidated into six overarching themes through a focus group discussion with FCR experts. The 33 research items were presented in subsequent rounds of the delphi technique. Twenty one participants contributed to delphi round 1, 16 in round 2, and 25 and 29 participants for subsequent delphi rounds. Consensus was reached for 27 items in round 3.1. A further four research items were identified by panelists and included in round 3.2. After round 3.2, 35 individual research items were ratified by the panelists. Given the high levels of consensus and stability between rounds, no further rounds were conducted. Overall intervention research was considered the most important focus for FCR research. Panelists identified models of care that facilitate greater access to FCR treatment and evaluation of the effectiveness of FCR interventions in real world settings as the two research items of highest priority. Defining the mechanisms of action and active components across FCR/P interventions was the third highest priority identified. Conclusion The findings of this study outline a research agenda for international FCR research. Intervention research to identify models of care that increase access to treatment are based on a flexible approach based on symptom severity and can be delivered within routine clinical care were identified as research areas to prioritize. Greater understanding of the active components and mechanisms of action of existing FCR interventions will facilitate increased tailoring of interventions to meet patient need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Kamphuis
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Ben Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), South Western Sydney Clinical School, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hulbert-Williams
- Centre for Contextual Behavioural Science, School of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, United Kingdom
| | - Haryana Mary Dhillon
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Science, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van Eenennaam RM, Kruithof WJ, van Es MA, Kruitwagen-van Reenen ET, Westeneng HJ, Visser-Meily JMA, van den Berg LH, Beelen A. Discussing personalized prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development of a communication guide. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:446. [PMID: 33308184 PMCID: PMC7734773 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-02004-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personalized ENCALS survival prediction model reliably estimates the personalized prognosis of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Concerns were raised on discussing personalized prognosis without causing anxiety and destroying hope. Tailoring communication to patient readiness and patient needs mediates the impact of prognostic disclosure. We developed a communication guide to support physicians in discussing personalized prognosis tailored to individual needs and preferences of people with ALS and their families. METHODS A multidisciplinary working group of neurologists, rehabilitation physicians, and healthcare researchers A) identified relevant topics for guidance, B) conducted a systematic review on needs of patients regarding prognostic discussion in life-limiting disease, C) drafted recommendations based on evidence and expert opinion, and refined and finalized these recommendations in consensus rounds, based on feedback of an expert advisory panel (patients, family member, ethicist, and spiritual counsellor). RESULTS A) Topics identified for guidance were 1) filling in the ENCALS survival model, and interpreting outcomes and uncertainty, and 2) tailoring discussion to individual needs and preferences of patients (information needs, role and needs of family, severe cognitive impairment or frontotemporal dementia, and non-western patients). B) 17 studies were included in the systematic review. C) Consensus procedures on drafted recommendations focused on selection of outcomes, uncertainty about estimated survival, culturally sensitive communication, and lack of decisional capacity. Recommendations for discussing the prognosis include the following: discuss prognosis based on the prognostic groups and their median survival, or, if more precise information is desired, on the interquartile range of the survival probability. Investigate needs and preferences of the patients and their families for prognostic disclosure, regardless of cultural background. If the patient does not want to know their prognosis, with patient permission discuss the prognosis with their family. If the patient is judged to lack decisional capacity, ask the family if they want to discuss the prognosis. Tailor prognostic disclosure step by step, discuss it in terms of time range, and emphasize uncertainty of individual survival time. CONCLUSION This communication guide supports physicians in tailoring discussion of personalized prognosis to the individual needs and preferences of people with ALS and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remko M van Eenennaam
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke J Kruithof
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael A van Es
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther T Kruitwagen-van Reenen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Westeneng
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonard H van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anita Beelen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Breen LJ, Johnson AR, O'Connor M, Howting D, Aoun SM. Challenges in Palliative Care Research on Family Caregivers: Who Volunteers for Interviews? J Palliat Med 2020; 24:112-115. [PMID: 32255736 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Interviews are a common method of data collection in palliative care research because they facilitate the gathering of rich, experiential data that are important for theory and practice. What is less clear is the extent to which those interviewed are representative of the larger group. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if family caregivers who volunteer to be interviewed were similar or different to those who do not. Design: This study used data from the Caregiving and Bereavement study, a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods study of family caregivers' general health, quality of life, and grief. Setting/Subjects: The 16 caregivers who volunteered to be interviewed were compared to the 20 who did not. Measurements: Comparisons were made in terms of the caregivers' demographic characteristics as well as measures of their quality of life, general health, general grief, and caregiver prolonged grief (i.e., before death). Results: Compared to caregivers who did not volunteer for an interview, those who volunteered were significantly older and reported less caregiver prolonged grief. Logistic regression showed that for each 1-unit increase in the caregiver prolonged grief score, individuals were 13% less likely to agree to an interview. Conclusions: Research findings based upon family caregivers who volunteer for research interviews might not provide a full picture of their experiences and needs. Researchers are encouraged to consider strategies that sample broadly and promote the participation of the full range of family caregivers in research to address the neglected areas of pre- and postdeath bereavement care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Breen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew R Johnson
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Moira O'Connor
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Denise Howting
- Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samar M Aoun
- Public Health Palliative Care Unit, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hasson F, Nicholson E, Muldrew D, Bamidele O, Payne S, McIlfatrick S. International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:16. [PMID: 32013949 PMCID: PMC6998205 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-0520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been increasing evidence and debate on palliative care research priorities and the international research agenda. To date, however, there is a lack of synthesis of this evidence, examining commonalities, differences, and gaps. To identify and synthesize literature on international palliative care research priorities originating from Western countries mapped to a quality assessment framework. METHODS A systematic review of several academic and grey databases were searched from January 2008-June 2019 for studies eliciting research priorities in palliative care in English. Two researchers independently reviewed, critically appraised, and conducted data extraction and synthesis. RESULTS The search yielded 10,235 articles (academic databases, n = 4108; grey literature, n = 6127), of which ten were included for appraisal and review. Priority areas were identified: service models; continuity of care; training and education; inequality; communication; living well and independently; and recognising family/carer needs and the importance of families. Methodological approaches and process of reporting varied. There was little representation of patient and caregiver driven agendas. The priorities were mapped to the Donabedian framework for assessing quality reflecting structure, process and outcomes and key priority areas. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists pertaining to research priorities across palliative care. Whilst a broad range of topics were elicited, approaches and samples varied questioning the credibility of findings. The voice of the care provider dominated, calling for more inclusive means to capture the patient and family voice. The findings of this study may serve as a template to understand the commonalities of research, identify gaps, and extend the palliative care research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Hasson
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland.
| | - Emma Nicholson
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, UCD College of Health and Agricultural Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Deborah Muldrew
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
| | - Olufikayo Bamidele
- Academcy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RZ, England
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA14YX, Lancaster, UK
| | - Sonja McIlfatrick
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wong CHL, Wu IXY, Balneaves LG, Lo RSK, Witt CM, Wu JCY, Leung TH, Chung VCH. Prioritizing Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Questions in Cancer Palliative Care: International Delphi Survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:1002-1014.e7. [PMID: 31404640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Chinese medicine modalities, including acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), have been used as palliative interventions among cancer patients. More research should be conducted to confirm their effectiveness. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to prioritize Chinese medicine clinical research questions for cancer palliative care. METHODS Twelve international experts, including physicians, Chinese medicine practitioners, nurses, and clinical research methodologists (n = 3 from each category), from Asia, North America, Australia, and Europe participated in a two-round Delphi survey for prioritizing 29 research questions identified from existing systematic reviews. The experts were asked to 1) rate clinical importance of answering the questions on a nine-point Likert scale; 2) provide qualitative comments on their ratings; and 3) suggest outcome measurement approaches. RESULTS Eight research priorities reached positive consensus after the two-round Delphi survey. Six of the priorities focused on acupuncture and related therapies, of which median ratings on importance ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 (interquartile range: 1.00 to 2.50), and the percentage agreement ranged from 75.0% to 91.7%. The remaining two priorities related to CHM, with median ratings ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 (interquartile range: 1.00 to 1.50) and percentage agreement ranged from 75.0% to 83.3%. Neither positive nor negative consensus was established among the remaining 21 questions. CONCLUSION The findings will inform rational allocation of scarce research funding for evaluating the effectiveness of Chinese medicine for cancer palliative care, especially on acupuncture and related therapies. Further research on herb safety and herb-drug interaction should be performed before conducting international trials on CHM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene H L Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Irene X Y Wu
- Xiang-Ya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lynda G Balneaves
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Raymond S K Lo
- Hospice and Palliative Care, New Territories East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Claudia M Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Justin C Y Wu
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Ting Hung Leung
- School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Vincent C H Chung
- School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hay A, Hall CW, Sealey M, Lobb EA, Breen LJ. Developing a practice-based research agenda for grief and bereavement care. DEATH STUDIES 2019; 45:331-341. [PMID: 31293223 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1636897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to identify practitioners' perspectives on current research priorities in grief and bereavement care. Grief and bereavement care providers were invited to participate in a three-phase Delphi study to create expert consensus on the top priorities for grief and bereavement research. A total of 140 participants completed Phase 1, 84 completed Phase 2, and 70 completed Phase 3. These top 10 research priorities form the basis of a practice-based research agenda for grief and bereavement care to enable researchers to respond to key issues in grief and bereavement care that will ultimately improve the lives of bereaved people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashton Hay
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Margaret Sealey
- College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Lobb
- Calvary Health Care Kogarah, Kogarah, Australia
- Cunningham Centre for Palliative Care, Darlinghurst, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Lauren J Breen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|