Comparing Palliative Care Knowledge in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas of the United States: Results from a National Survey

Economic Value of Unpaid Family Caregiver Time Following Hospital Discharge and at End of Life

CONTEXT

Family caregivers (FCGs) play a crucial role in care for people with serious illness, yet unpaid care is often overlooked in estimates of care recipient (CR) care costs.

OBJECTIVES

This study quantifies the economic value of unpaid caregiving by FCGs between hospital discharge and end of life.

METHODS

Trial participants were rural FCGs of CRs receiving palliative care during hospitalization. Caregiving hours were self-reported by FCGs over six months following hospital discharge. Economic value was assigned to hours based on wage data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Time was valued using 1) home health aide wages (proxy cost), 2) median national wage by FCG sex and education level (opportunity cost), 3) opportunity cost if employed and proxy cost otherwise (combination cost).

RESULTS

Of 282 FCGs, 94% were non-Hispanic White, 71% were female, 71% had a college degree, and 51% were in the workforce. FCGs of decedents (58%) compared to survivors reported significantly more caregiving hours per person-month (392 vs. 272), resulting in higher estimated economic value per person-month using opportunity ($12,653 vs. $8843), proxy ($5689 vs. $3955), and combined costing methods ($9490 vs. $6443) CONCLUSION: This study informs more complete economic evaluations of palliative care by estimating the economic value of unpaid caregiving. The high intensity of unpaid caregiving for people with serious illness, especially toward the end of life, should be considered when designing policies and interventions to support FCGs. Better methods for approximating economic value are needed to address potential inequities in current valuation approaches.

Palliative Care Research and Clinical Practice Priorities in the United States as Identified by an Interdisciplinary Modified Delphi Approach

Background: Palliative care demands in the United States are growing amid a comparatively small workforce of palliative care clinicians and researchers. Therefore, determining research and clinical practice priorities is essential for streamlining initiatives to advance palliative care science and practice. Objectives: To identify and rank palliative care research and clinical practice priority areas through expert consensus. Design: Using a modified Delphi method, U.S. palliative care experts identified and ranked priority areas in palliative care research and clinical practice. Priorities were thematically grouped and analyzed for topic content and frequency; univariate analysis used the median of each priority item ranking, with a cutoff median of ≤8 indicating >76% agreement for an item's ranking. Results: In total, 27 interdisciplinary pediatric and adult palliative care experts representing 19 different academic institutions and medical centers participated in the preliminary survey and the first Delphi round, and 22 participated in the second Delphi round. The preliminary survey generated 78 initial topics, which were developed into 22 priority areas during the consensus meeting. The top five priorities were (1) access to palliative care, (2) equity in palliative care, (3) adequate financing of palliative care, (4) provision of palliative care in primary care settings, and (5) palliative care workforce challenges. Conclusions: These expert-identified priority areas provide guidance for researchers and practitioners to develop innovative models, policies, and interventions, thereby enriching the quality of life for those requiring palliative care services.

Implementation Costs of Technology-Enhanced Transitional Palliative Care for Rural Caregivers

OBJECTIVES

Compared to urban family caregivers (FCG), rural FCG experience greater burdens accessing coordinated care for their loved ones during and after hospitalization. The impact of technology-enhanced transitional palliative care (TPC) on caregiver outcomes is currently being evaluated in a randomized control trial. This study evaluates resource use and health system costs of this FCG-focused TPC intervention and potential Medicare reimbursement mechanisms.

METHODS

Rural caregivers of hospitalized patients were randomized into an 8-week intervention consisting of video visits conducted by a registered nurse certified in palliative care, supplemented with phone calls and texts (n = 215), or attentional control. Labor costs were estimated for a registered nurse and compared to scenario analyses using a nurse practitioner or social worker wages. Medicare reimbursement scenarios included Transitional Care Management (TCM) and Chronic Care Management (CCM) CPT codes.

RESULTS

In the base case, TPC cost was $395 per FCG facilitated by a registered nurse, compared to $337 and $585 if facilitated by a social worker or nurse practitioner, respectively. Mean Medicare reimbursement in the TCM-only scenario was $322 and $260 for high or moderate complexity patients, respectively. Reimbursement in the CCM only scenario was $348 and $274 for complex and non-complex patients, respectively. Reimbursement in the TCM+CCM scenario was $496 and $397, for high/complex and moderate/non-complex patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TPC is a feasible, low cost and sustainable strategy to enhance FCG support in rural areas. Potential reimbursement mechanisms are available to offset the costs to the health system for providing transitional palliative care to caregivers of patients recently hospitalized.

Palliative Care Knowledge and Attitudes Among Patients With Neuroinflammatory Diseases

Background: Neuroinflammatory diseases are progressive leading to loss of function and disability. Although palliative care (PC) utilization has increased globally, it has scarcely increased in neurology. Objectives: To explore PC attitudes and knowledge among patients with neuroinflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Methods: A cross-sectional 1-year study was conducted using the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) and the PC Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Murray's transition theory guided this study, which integrates palliative services including decision making, communication, and coordinated care. Results: The majority of study patients were female (69%) (N = 86) and White (79%). Forty-two percent indicated that they had never heard about PC, 46% said that they knew a little bit about PC, and 12% said that they knew a lot about PC. Fifty percent of patients knew the goals of PC and had knowledge about PC services. Forty-four percent to 60% agreed that PC goals include helping friends and family to cope with a patient's illness, offering social and emotional support, and managing pain and other symptoms. Patients who self-reported being familiar with PC performed significantly better on the PaCKS than those unfamiliar with PC (p < 0.001), and those who self-reported moderate or severe memory loss performed significantly worse on the PaCKS than those with mild memory loss (p = 0.027). There was an association between higher education and PC knowledge and between patients' PaCKS scores and their self-reported HINTS PC knowledge. Conclusions: Patients have partial PC knowledge. Patients require education about PC early in their disease along their illness trajectory.

Barriers for Adult Patients to Access Palliative Care in Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Access to palliative care services is variable, and many inpatients do not receive palliative care. An overview of potential barriers could facilitate the development of strategies to overcome factors that impede access for patients with palliative care needs.

AIM

To review the current evidence on barriers that impair, delay, or prohibit access to palliative care for adult hospital inpatients.

DESIGN

A mixed methods systematic review was conducted using an integrated convergent approach and thematic synthesis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021279477).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from 10/2003 to 12/2020. Studies with evidence of barriers for inpatients to access existing palliative care services were eligible and reviewed.

RESULTS

After an initial screening of 3,359 records and 555 full-texts, 79 studies were included. Thematic synthesis yielded 149 access-related phenomena in 6 main categories: 1) Sociodemographic characteristics, 2) Health-related characteristics, 3) Individual beliefs and attitudes, 4) Interindividual cooperation and support, 5) Availability and allocation of resources, and 6) Emotional and prognostic challenges. While evidence was inconclusive for most socio-demographic factors, the following barriers emerged: having a noncancer condition or a low symptom burden, the focus on cure in hospitals, nonacceptance of terminal prognosis, negative perceptions of palliative care, misleading communication and conflicting care preferences, lack of resources, poor coordination, insufficient expertise, and clinicians' emotional discomfort and difficult prognostication.

CONCLUSION

Hospital inpatients face multiple barriers to accessing palliative care. Strategies to address these barriers need to take into account their multidimensionality and long-standing persistence.

Knowledge, goals, and misperceptions about palliative care in adults with chronic disease or cancer

OBJECTIVES

Limited evidence investigates how knowledge, misconceptions, and beliefs about palliative care vary across patients with cancerous versus non-cancerous chronic disease. We examined the knowledge of and misconceptions about palliative care among these groups.

METHODS

We used weighted data from the National Cancer Institute Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (Cycle 2) for nationally representative estimates and logistic regression to adjust for respondent characteristics. We identified respondents who reported having (1) cancer ([n = 585]; breast, lung, and colorectal), (2) chronic conditions ([n = 543]; heart failure, lung disease, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder), or (3) neither cancer nor other chronic conditions (n = 2,376).

RESULTS

Compared to cancer respondents, chronic condition respondents were more likely to report being Black or Hispanic, report a disability, and have lower socioeconomic status. In the sample, 65.6% of cancer respondents and 72.8% chronic conditions respondents reported they had never heard of palliative care. Chronic condition respondents were significantly (p < 0.05) less likely to report high palliative care knowledge than cancer respondents (9.1% vs. 16.6%, respectively). In adjusted analyses, cancer respondents had greater odds of high palliative care knowledge (odd ratio [OR] = 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 2.86) compared to respondents with neither cancer nor chronic disease; chronic condition respondents did not have increased odds (OR = 0.96; CI = 0.59, 1.54).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Disparities in palliative care knowledge exist among people with non-cancerous chronic disease compared to cancer. Supportive educational efforts to boost knowledge about palliative care remains urgent and is critical for promoting equity, particularly for underserved people with chronic illnesses.

Improving Palliative Care Knowledge among Hospitalized Hispanic Patients: A Pilot Study

Background: Lack of knowledge of palliative care has been identified as a primary barrier to access to care, with a recent survey reporting that Hispanics have the lowest rate of palliative care knowledge compared with other racial/ethnic groups. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if there were trends toward improved palliative care knowledge after viewing four-minute video of a palliative care patient. Methods: We conducted a pre- and posttest pilot study among 50 Spanish-speaking, hospitalized Hispanic patients 40 years old and older in a large public hospital. We used the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) to assess palliative care knowledge. Two questions measured intention to enroll in palliative care. Paired sample t-tests were conducted to investigate change in PaCKS scores. McNemar's test was used to compare differences in intentions to enroll in palliative care from pretest to posttest. We conducted linear regression analysis to determine factors associated with improved knowledge at posttest. Results: PaCKS scores revealed significant improvement in palliative care knowledge following viewing of the video, with scores increasing from an average of 6.4-11.4 at posttest. Intentions to enroll a family member in palliative care increased from 64% at pretest to 64%-98% at posttest. Intentions to enroll oneself increased from 72% to 92%. Conclusions: Brief exposure to a relatable role model may be effective in improving knowledge and intentions to enroll in palliative care services. More research is needed to determine if these videos are effective in increasing enrollment in palliative care.

Survey Study of Awareness and Perception of Palliative and Hospice Care in a Cancer Center in Rural Pennsylvania

Purpose: Hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) have been gaining ground especially in large urban settings. However, less is known about their perception in small rural areas. This study assessed the awareness and perception of a rural oncology population of this field and the effects of prognosis on their awareness.

Methods: Subjects were patients of the community cancer center in rural Clarion County, Pennsylvania, who volunteered to complete a short nine-question survey (supplemental figure). Results were analyzed based on completed surveys.

Results: A total of 65 surveys were collected from the Cancer Center at the Clarion Hospital. Among these patients, 54% stated that they have heard of palliative and hospice medicine. When correlating patient-reported prognosis with their awareness of palliative and hospice care, 100% of the patients with poor prognosis were aware of palliative or hospice care, respectively. In contrast, only <20% of patients with reported good prognosis were aware of HPM.

Conclusions: Our study has shown that the awareness of HPM in rural areas is improving. It was observed that more patients are aware of HPM is when their prognosis was poor as compared with those who reported good prognosis.