1
|
Passero LE, Roberts MC. Challenges and opportunities for Lynch syndrome cascade testing in the United States. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:147-154. [PMID: 38548925 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00374-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is an underdiagnosed genetic condition that increases lifetime colorectal, endometrial, and other cancer risk. Cascade testing in relatives is recommended to increase diagnoses and enable access to cancer prevention services, yet uptake is limited due to documented multi-level barriers. Individual barriers such as feelings of fear, guilt, and anxiety and limited knowledge about Lynch syndrome as well as interpersonal barriers including complex family dynamics and language barriers limit family communication about Lynch syndrome and prevent uptake of genetic screening for relatives. Organizational and environmental barriers including a shortage of genetics professionals, high costs, and fears of discrimination also reduce cascade testing. These multi-level barriers may disproportionately impact underserved populations in the United States, such as individuals with lower incomes, limited English-speaking proficiency, lower educational attainment, and inadequate access to health systems. Multi-level facilitators of cascade testing include interpersonal support from family members, peers, and healthcare providers, educational resources, and motivation to improve family health. Taken together, these barriers and facilitators demonstrate a need for interventions and strategies that address multi-level factors to increase cascade testing in families with Lynch syndrome and other hereditary cancer conditions. We provide an example of a cascade testing intervention that has been developed for use in individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome and discuss the variety of current approaches to addressing these multi-level barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Passero
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Key KD, Lewis L, Blanchard C, Sikorskii A, Patel M, Lucas T, Akintobi TH, Bailey S, Loney EH, Johnson JE. Study protocol: Exploring the use of Family Health Histories in the African American community to reduce health disparities in Flint, Michigan. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4131949. [PMID: 38645135 PMCID: PMC11030532 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4131949/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Background Health disparities are costly and preventable differences in disease progression that disproportionately affect minority communities such as African Americans. Practices to reduce health disparities can be rooted in prevention, particularly through screening tools. Family Health History tools are preventative screening mechanisms meant to explore family history to better understand how an individual's health can potentially be predicted or impacted. These tools are underutilized in the African American community. Contributions to this underutilization include a lack of cultural tailoring in the tools, a lack of health literacy in community members, and a lack of effective health communication. The Family Health History Study will create a culturally appropriate Family Health History toolkit to increase family health history utilization and ultimately decrease health disparities. Methods The proposed sample will be composed of 195 African American adults ages 18 + who live in Genesee County, Michigan. The study consists of two phases: the development phase and the randomized pilot study phase. The goal of the development phase (n = 95) is to explore how Family Health History toolkits can be modified to better serve the African American community using a community based participatory research approach and to create a culturally tailored family health history toolkit. In the pilot study phase, 100 participants will be randomized to the culturally tailored toolkit or the current standard Family Health History toolkit. Outcomes will include feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Discussion This study will result in a culturally appropriate Family Health History tool that is co-developed with community members that can be utilized by African American adults to better understand their family health histories. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05358964 Date: May 5, 2022.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cragun DL, Hunt PP, Dean M, Weidner A, Shields AK, Tezak A, Pal T. Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100133. [PMID: 37214492 PMCID: PMC10194404 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Evaluate an intervention to increase family communication (FC) of positive hereditary cancer test results using the Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (FDECI). Methods We developed 'programme theory' during the FDECI development phase by aligning intervention components with behavior change techniques (BCTs) and theoretical factors expected to improve FC. During the feasibility phase, we obtained feedback from 12 stakeholder interviews. Results Intervention components aligned with a total of 14 unique BCTs for which prior evidence links the BCT to theoretical factors that influence behavior change. Constructive stakeholder feedback included: more information desired, rewording to support autonomy by highlighting options, and improvements to navigation, visuals, and audio. Positive comments included: comprehensiveness of materials, modeling of conversations, and usefulness of the materials for helping a person prepare to share positive test results. Conclusion The first FDECI phases were helpful for improving the intervention and planning our ongoing effectiveness and future implementation phases. Innovation Our application of the FDECI is novel, including plans to test our 'programme theory' using coincidence analysis (CNA) to determine who accesses which intervention materials, how utilizing certain materials impact the aligned theoretical factors, and whether these in turn make a difference in the behavioral outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah L. Cragun
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Paige Phillips Hunt
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Marleah Dean
- University of South Florida, Department of Communication, Tampa, FL; Health Outcomes & Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Health Outcomes & Behavior Program, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Anne Weidner
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Andrea K. Shields
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Ann Tezak
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ballard LM, Band R, Lucassen AM. Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM). Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:988-1002. [PMID: 37344572 PMCID: PMC10474271 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Whilst the finding of heritable susceptibility to disease was once relatively rare, mainstreaming of genetic testing has resulted in a steady increase. Patients are often encouraged to share their genetic test results with relevant relatives, but relatives may not receive this information, leaving them without knowledge of their own risk. Therefore, strategies to help communicate such information are important. This review aimed to explore the efficacy of existing interventions to improve the sharing of genetic test results. A synthesis without meta-analysis design was used. A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and AMED was conducted, and five studies were identified worldwide. Data were extracted for each study regarding study aim, participant characteristics, condition, intervention details, comparison, study duration, outcome measures, theory and behaviour change techniques used. Limited efficacy and application of theory was found. Knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy were not increased in any intervention. No gender differences in communication behaviour were encountered in interventions that recruited men and women. Two studies reported an evaluation of acceptability, which showed that the interventions were well received by patients and health professionals. No study reported the involvement of the target population in any phase of intervention development. Given the lack of health psychology-informed interventions in this area of clinical genetics, we recommend genetic health professionals, health psychologists and patients collaborate on all stages of future interventions that involve the cascading of genetic health information within families. We also provide guidance regarding use of theory and intervention elements for future intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Marie Ballard
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| | - Rebecca Band
- Health Sciences, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Anneke M Lucassen
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Clinical ethics, law and society (CELS), Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lima E, Esplen MJ, Martins F, Alves M, Sales CMD. Communication about hereditary cancer risk to offspring: A systematic review of children's perspective. Psychooncology 2023. [PMID: 37114280 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present review describes how children experience hereditary cancer risk communication within the family. METHODS Searches for studies between 1990 and 2020 on PubMed and EBSCO were undertaken, and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The findings informed: (1) how, when and what is discussed about hereditary cancer risk in the family; (2) how does family communication about hereditary cancer risk impact children on psychosocial and behavioral outcomes; (3) what are the child's preferences regarding hereditary cancer risk communication within the family. RESULTS Disclosure is done mostly by both parents, or mothers only, which is in accordance with the children's preferences. Children value open communication about cancer risk with their parents, although they report experiences of fear, surprise, feeling unhappy, and concern about the increased risk of cancer. Regardless of the method of disclosure, children may be particularly sensitive to their parent's emotional state at the time of disclosure, and they learn from their parents' experiences the potential implications of cancer risk. Children also report that it would be helpful to learn more about genetic cancer syndromes via written materials, and/or meet a genetic counselor. CONCLUSIONS Children rely on their parents as the primary models of the hereditary cancer experience. Therefore, parents play a central role in the psychological adjustment of children. Findings point to the relevance of family-centered care in hereditary cancer risk that targets not only the mutation carrier individually but also their children and partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esperança Lima
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mary Jane Esplen
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Filipa Martins
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marisa Alves
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Célia M D Sales
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kinnamon DD, Jordan E, Haas GJ, Hofmeyer M, Kransdorf E, Ewald GA, Morris AA, Owens A, Lowes B, Stoller D, Tang WHW, Garg S, Trachtenberg BH, Shah P, Pamboukian SV, Sweitzer NK, Wheeler MT, Wilcox JE, Katz S, Pan S, Jimenez J, Aaronson KD, Fishbein DP, Smart F, Wang J, Gottlieb SS, Judge DP, Moore CK, Mead JO, Huggins GS, Ni H, Burke W, Hershberger RE. Effectiveness of the Family Heart Talk Communication Tool in Improving Family Member Screening for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Results of a Randomized Trial. Circulation 2023; 147:1281-1290. [PMID: 36938756 PMCID: PMC10133091 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.062507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing disease risk among first-degree relatives of probands diagnosed with a heritable disease is central to precision medicine. A critical component is often clinical screening, which is particularly important for conditions like dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) that remain asymptomatic until severe disease develops. Nonetheless, probands are frequently ill-equipped to disseminate genetic risk information that motivates at-risk relatives to complete recommended clinical screening. An easily implemented remedy for this key issue has been elusive. METHODS The DCM Precision Medicine Study developed Family Heart Talk, a booklet designed to help probands with DCM communicate genetic risk and the need for cardiovascular screening to their relatives. The effectiveness of the Family Heart Talk booklet in increasing cardiovascular clinical screening uptake among first-degree relatives was assessed in a multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. The primary outcome measured in eligible first-degree relatives was completion of screening initiated within 12 months after proband enrollment. Because probands randomized to the intervention received the booklet at the enrollment visit, eligible first-degree relatives were limited to those who were alive the day after proband enrollment and not enrolled on the same day as the proband. RESULTS Between June 2016 and March 2020, 1241 probands were randomized (1:1) to receive Family Heart Talk (n=621) or not (n=620) within strata defined by site and self-identified race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, or Hispanic). Final analyses included 550 families (n=2230 eligible first-degree relatives) in the Family Heart Talk arm and 561 (n=2416) in the control arm. A higher percentage of eligible first-degree relatives completed screening in the Family Heart Talk arm (19.5% versus 16.0%), and the odds of screening completion among these first-degree relatives were higher in the Family Heart Talk arm after adjustment for proband randomization stratum, sex, and age quartile (odds ratio, 1.30 [1-sided 95% CI, 1.08-∞]). A prespecified subgroup analysis did not find evidence of heterogeneity in the adjusted intervention odds ratio across race/ethnicity strata (P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS Family Heart Talk, a booklet that can be provided to patients with DCM by clinicians with minimal additional time investment, was effective in increasing cardiovascular clinical screening among first-degree relatives of these patients. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT03037632.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D. Kinnamon
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Elizabeth Jordan
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Garrie J. Haas
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Mark Hofmeyer
- Medstar Research Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Evan Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Anjali Owens
- Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brian Lowes
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | | - W. H. Wilson Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sonia Garg
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Barry H. Trachtenberg
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Houston TX
| | - Palak Shah
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA
| | - Salpy V. Pamboukian
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; current address, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Nancy K. Sweitzer
- Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; current address, Division of Cardiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Matthew T. Wheeler
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Jane E. Wilcox
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Stuart Katz
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen Pan
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center & New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Javier Jimenez
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South, Miami, FL
| | | | | | - Frank Smart
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Jessica Wang
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Jonathan O. Mead
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Gordon S. Huggins
- Cardiology Division, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Hanyu Ni
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Wylie Burke
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ray E. Hershberger
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pollard S, Weymann D, Loewen R, Nuk J, Sun S, Schrader KA, Hessels C, Regier DA. Development and early-stage evaluation of a patient portal to enhance familial communication about hereditary cancer susceptibility testing: A patient-driven approach. Health Expect 2023; 26:774-784. [PMID: 36660874 PMCID: PMC10010078 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCSs) can improve health outcomes through cancer risk mitigation strategies. Effective communication between tested individuals and their family members is key to reducing the hereditary cancer burden. Our objective was to develop a patient portal to improve familial communication for patients undergoing HCS genetic testing, followed by an early-phase evaluation. METHODS The portal was developed following the completion of 25 semistructured interviews with individuals having undergone HCS susceptibility testing at BC Cancer. Following initial development, we recruited patients and healthcare providers to provide critical feedback informing portal refinement. Quantitative feedback was summarized using descriptive statistics, and qualitative feedback was synthesized by two reviewers who engaged in iterative discussion within the research team to prioritize recommendations for integration. RESULTS The patient portal includes four key components consisting of (a) targeted educational information about hereditary cancer and HBOC syndrome associated risks and testing process overview, (b) a general frequently asked questions 'FAQ' page informed by the qualitative interviews, patient partner feedback, and consultation with the HCP, (c) guidance to support familial communication including a video developed with a patient partner describing their lived experience navigating the communication process and (d) a series of lay summaries of genetic test findings to support information transfer among family members. Thirteen healthcare providers and seven patients participated in user testing. Domains within which participant recommendations were provided included presentation, educational content and process clarification. CONCLUSIONS This investigation demonstrates the value of continual integration of patient and provider preferences through the development of tools endeavouring to assist with complex genomics-informed decision-making. Our work aims to broaden the population-wide impact of HCS testing programs by improving communication processes between probands and their potentially affected family members. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This work involved a patient partner who was actively engaged in all aspects of the research investigation including protocol development, review and editing of all study documentation (including that of the previously published qualitative investigation), interpretation of results, as well as reviewing and editing the manuscript. Patient partners and healthcare professionals were recruited as research participants to provide critical feedback on the patient portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Pollard
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rosalie Loewen
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sophie Sun
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chiquita Hessels
- Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Association Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Passero L, Srinivasan S, Grewe ME, Leeman J, Berg J, Reuland D, Roberts MC. Development and initial testing of a multi-stakeholder intervention for Lynch syndrome cascade screening: an intervention mapping approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1411. [PMID: 36434579 PMCID: PMC9694070 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08732-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is an underdiagnosed hereditary condition carrying an increased lifetime risk for colorectal and endometrial cancer and affecting nearly 1 million people in the United States. Cascade screening, systematic screening through family members of affected patients, could improve identification of Lynch syndrome, but this strategy is underused due to multi-level barriers including low knowledge about Lynch syndrome, low access to genetics services, and challenging family dynamics. METHODS We used intervention mapping, a 6-step methodology to create stakeholder-driven interventions that meet the needs of a target population, to develop an intervention to improve cascade screening for Lynch syndrome. The intervention development process was guided by input from key stakeholders in Lynch syndrome care and patients. We conducted usability testing on the intervention with Lynch syndrome patients using qualitative semi-structured interviewing and rapid qualitative analysis. RESULTS We developed a workbook intervention named Let's Talk that addresses gaps in knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, outcome expectancy and other perceived barriers to cascade screening for Lynch syndrome. Let's Talk contained educational content, goal setting activities, communication planning prompts and supplemental resources for patients to plan family communication. Evidence-based methods used in the workbook included information chunking, guided practice, goal setting and gain-framing. We conducted usability testing focused on the complexity and relative advantage of the intervention through 45-min virtual interviews with 10 adult patients with Lynch syndrome recruited from a national advocacy organization in the United States. Usability testing results suggested the intervention was acceptable in terms of complexity and relative advantage to other available resources, but additional information for communication with young or distant family members and a web-based platform could enhance the intervention's usability. CONCLUSIONS Intervention mapping provided a framework for intervention development that addressed the unique needs of Lynch syndrome patients in overcoming barriers to cascade screening. Future work is needed to transform Let's Talk into a web-based tool and evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in clinical practice with patients and genetic counselors. Intervention mapping can be useful to researchers as an evidence-based technique to develop stakeholder-centered interventions for addressing the needs of other unique populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Passero
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Swetha Srinivasan
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Mary E Grewe
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Jonathan Berg
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Daniel Reuland
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, US.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao J, Guan Y, McBride CM. A systematic review of theory-informed strategies used in interventions fostering family genetic risk communication. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1953-1962. [PMID: 35304074 PMCID: PMC9203975 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherited risk is a family issue. Identifying family members who carry a pathogenic genetic variant that increases risk of cancers and other chronic diseases can be lifesaving for those affected. OBJECTIVE The research questions are: (1) which family communication frameworks have been applied, (2) how do intervention strategies employed map to these theories, and (3) to what extent were families receptive to these strategies and communication increased? METHODS Manuscripts published between January 2010 and August 2020 were searched in three databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. RESULTS Nine intervention trials were identified. All interventions were evaluated in clinical genetic counseling contexts using at least one individual-level strategy (e.g. increase knowledge). Only three focused on dyadic conversations such as preparing for relatives' information needs. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review posed the question whether theoretically based approaches have been applied to foster family genetic risk communication. Greater attention needs to be paid to the utilization of dyadic level and family system level theories to guide intervention developments. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS We conclude by calling for accelerating and broadening the development of interventions to enable family communication about inherited risk that are theory-based, incorporate family-systems thinking, and are conducted outside of specialty clinic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingsong Zhao
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, GA, USA.
| | - Yue Guan
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, GA, USA
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li M, Zhao S, Young CM, Foster M, Huei-Yu Wang J, Tseng TS, Kwok OM, Chen LS. Family Health History-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61:445-454. [PMID: 34226092 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT National efforts have advocated for the need to deliver family health history-based interventions to the lay public for more than a decade. Yet, the numbers, characteristics, and outcomes of such interventions are unknown. This first-of-its-kind systematic literature review examines the characteristics and effectiveness of the existing family health history-based interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The research team systematically searched peer-reviewed articles published between January 2003 and July 2020 in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed various behaviors, including family health history collection/communication with family members, family health history communication with healthcare providers, healthy diet adoption, physical activity level, uptake of medical screenings and genetic tests, and being proactive in healthcare matters. The average methodologic quality score of the studies was 9.9 (SD=1.6) of a theoretical range from 2 to 16. CONCLUSIONS Many family health history-based interventions exist to examine a variety of behaviors. Yet, there is room for improvement in methodology because few studies used a randomized or quasi-experimental design. In addition, most included studies did not report objective or longer-term outcome data to examine the effectiveness of family health history-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health Professions, Towson University, Towson, Maryland
| | - Shixi Zhao
- Department College of Health Professions, Exercise & Sports Sciences, College of Education & Human Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | - Margaret Foster
- Medical Science Library, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Judy Huei-Yu Wang
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Tung-Sung Tseng
- Behavioral & Community Health Sciences Program, LSU School of Public Health, LSU Health New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Oi-Man Kwok
- Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education & Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102404. [PMID: 34065728 PMCID: PMC8155923 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Families with an inherited high risk of bowel cancer may struggle to share information about their diagnosis. This means that relatives are not always aware of their increased risk of cancer or able to access screening for the early detection of cancer. Through this study, we aimed to help such families by creating a website where patients could share confidential information with their relatives securely online. Following a survey and telephone interviews with affected individuals, the content of the website was developed to suit the needs of families. Website function was tested with patients to check feasibility and acceptability. Most participants wanted more information to support their adaptation to the diagnosis and help inform their relatives. This study demonstrates how health professionals can improve access to genetic testing and cancer screening in families at high risk of cancer, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. Abstract Individuals with pathogenic variants in genes predisposing to bowel cancer are encouraged to share this information within their families. Close relatives at 50% risk can have access to bowel cancer surveillance. However, many relatives remain unaware of their vulnerability or have insufficient information. We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of using a secure website to support information sharing within families at high risk of bowel cancer. Patients (n = 286) answered an anonymous cross-sectional survey, with 14 participating in telephone interviews. They reported that the diagnosis had a profound effect on them and their family relationships, and consequently desired more support from health professionals. Website content was created in response to the preferences of survey and interview participants. Reactions to the website from 12 volunteers were captured through remote usability testing to guide further refinement of the website. Participants welcomed the opportunity to store and share personal information via the website and wanted more information and help informing their relatives about the diagnosis. Important website topics were: healthy lifestyle; genetic testing; and how to talk to children about the diagnosis. A website providing online access to confidential documents was both feasible and acceptable and could translate into increased uptake of cancer surveillance, resulting in lower morbidity and mortality in these families.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang H, Yeh YL, Li M, Ma P, Kwok OM, Chen LS. Effects of family health history-based colorectal cancer prevention education among non-adherent Chinese Americans to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1149-1158. [PMID: 33176978 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined the effects of the first family health history (FHH)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention education on 1) FHH of CRC communication with family members and primary care physicians (PCPs), 2) fecal occult blood test (FOBT) uptake, and 3) CRC preventive lifestyle modifications among 50- to 75-year-old Chinese Americans non-adherent to CRC screening guidelines. METHODS Using a community-based participatory research approach, we developed and implemented 62 culturally and linguistically appropriate, theory-driven, FHH-based CRC prevention educational workshops across Texas for 344 Chinese Americans (mostly with low education/income) aged 50-75 years who were non-adherent to CRC screening guidelines. RESULTS Linear mixed modeling analyses showed that participants' FHH of CRC communication with PCPs and family members significantly increased two-week post-workshop compared to pre-workshop data (ps<0.001). Moreover, at two-weeks post-workshop, 91.9 % of participants underwent FOBT. Nevertheless, no significant changes were found in participants' lifestyles. CONCLUSION Our educational workshops successfully increased Chinese Americans' FHH of CRC communication and FOBT uptake. Personalized education with longer follow-ups may be needed in future studies to promote lifestyle changes among Chinese Americans. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health and public health professionals may adopt our workshop educational materials to provide patient and public CRC prevention education for Chinese Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haocen Wang
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
| | - Yu-Lyu Yeh
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Health Sciences, Towson University, Towson, USA
| | - Ping Ma
- Department of Health Promotion & Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
| | - Oi-Man Kwok
- Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
| | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dean M, Tezak AL, Johnson S, Pierce JK, Weidner A, Clouse K, Pal T, Cragun D. Sharing genetic test results with family members of BRCA, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM carriers. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:720-725. [PMID: 33455826 PMCID: PMC8005459 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored motivators and challenges/barriers to sharing personal genetic test results (GTR) with family members (FM). METHODS Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 62 women who had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in aBRCA, PALB2, CHEK2, or ATM gene. Selective qualitative data analysis focused on eliciting motivators and challenges/barriers identified by participants when sharing their GTR with FM. RESULTS Motivators to sharing personal GTR with FM included: health protection and prevention; moral obligation; decisional empowerment; familial ties; written resources; and contextualization for a familial cause for cancer. Challenges/barriers to family sharing included: concern for FM reactions; complexities of information; lack of closeness; perceived relevance; and emotional impact. CONCLUSIONS All motivators and challenges/barriers were identified across BRCA and non-BRCA carriers, demonstrating commonalities in family sharing of GTR among high- to moderate-penetrance hereditary BC (breast cancer) genes. Despite challenges/barriers, participants disclosed their GTR with most close FM, yet restrictions in communication and/or strain on the timing, manner of disclosing, and strategies used varied across certain FM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings offer healthcare providers and researchers preliminary practical implications for broadly improving family sharing interventions across P/LP variants in BC risk genes by demonstrating important elements to include in family sharing letters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marleah Dean
- Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Ann L Tezak
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in the Department of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sabrina Johnson
- Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joy K Pierce
- Cleveland Clinic, Indian River Hospital, Vero Beach, FL, USA
| | - Anne Weidner
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in the Department of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kate Clouse
- Department of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in the Department of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bowen DJ, Makhnoon S, Shirts BH, Fullerton SM, Larson E, Ralston JD, Leppig K, Crosslin DR, Veenstra D, Jarvik GP. What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:726-731. [PMID: 33455827 PMCID: PMC8005444 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We currently rely on probands to communicate genetic testing results and health risks within a family to stimulate preventive behaviors, such as cascade testing. Rates of guidelines-based cascade testing are low, possibly due to low frequency or non-urgent communication of risk among family members. Understanding what is being communicated and why may help improve interventions that increase communication and rates of cascade testing. METHODS Participants (n = 189) who were to receive both positive and negative colorectal cancer (CRC) sequencing results completed surveys on family communication, family functioning, impact of cancer in the family, and future communication of risk and were participants in eMERGE3. Questions were taken from existing surveys and administered electronically using email and a web driven tool. RESULTS Common family member targets of CRC risk communication, before results were received, were mothers and fathers, then sisters and grandchildren and finally, children and brothers. A communication impact score of 0.66 (sd = 0.83) indicated low-to-moderate communication impact. Age and education were significantly associated with frequency of familial communication, but not on the cancer-related impact of familial communication. CONCLUSIONS There is infrequent communication about cancer risk from probands to family members. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These results demonstrate an opportunity to help families improve communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Bowen
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
| | - Sukh Makhnoon
- Department of Behavioral Science, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Eric Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - James D Ralston
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA; Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Kathleen Leppig
- Genetic Services, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - David R Crosslin
- Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - David Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Housten AJ, Gunn CM, Paasche-Orlow MK, Basen-Engquist KM. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:240-252. [PMID: 33155097 PMCID: PMC8005416 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Approximately one-third of adults in the United States (U.S.) have limited health literacy. Those with limited health literacy often have difficultly navigating the health care environment, including navigating care across the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment). Evidence-based interventions to assist adults with limited health literacy improve health outcomes; however, little is known about health literacy interventions in the context of cancer and their impact on cancer-specific health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the literature on health literacy interventions across the cancer care continuum. Specifically, our aim was to review the strength of evidence, outcomes assessed, and intervention modalities within the existing literature reporting health literacy interventions in cancer. Our search yielded 1036 records (prevention/screening n = 174; diagnosis/treatment n = 862). Following deduplication and review for inclusion criteria, we analyzed 87 records of intervention studies reporting health literacy outcomes, including 45 pilot studies (prevention/screening n = 24; diagnosis/treatment n = 21) and 42 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental trials (prevention/screening n = 31; diagnosis/treatment n = 11). This literature included 36 unique interventions (prevention/screening n = 28; diagnosis/treatment n = 8), mostly in the formative stages of intervention development, with few assessments of evidence-based interventions. These gaps in the literature necessitate further research in the development and implementation of evidence-based health literacy interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Housten
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - C M Gunn
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K M Basen-Engquist
- Department of Behavioral Science, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baroutsou V, Underhill-Blazey ML, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Katapodi MC. Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040925. [PMID: 33672149 PMCID: PMC7926393 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic testing of blood relatives of known Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) or Lynch Syndrome (LS) cases, to inform individualized cancer screening and prevention plans. The study identified interventions designed to facilitate family communication of genetic testing results and/or cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing for HBOC and LS. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed intervention efficacy for these two outcomes. Additional outcomes were also recorded and synthesized when possible. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis and 13 in the meta-analysis. Lack of participant blinding was the most common risk of bias. Interventions targeted HBOC (n = 5); both HBOC and LS (n = 4); LS (n = 3); or ovarian cancer (n = 2). All protocols (n = 14) included a psychoeducational and/or counseling component. Additional components were decision aids (n = 4), building communication skills (n = 4), or motivational interviewing (n = 1). The overall effect size for family communication was small (g = 0.085) and not significant (p = 0.344), while for cascade testing, it was small (g = 0.169) but significant (p = 0.014). Interventions show promise for improving cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing for HBOC and LS. Future studies should employ family-based approaches and include racially diverse samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Baroutsou
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Meghan L. Underhill-Blazey
- School of Nursing, Wilmot Cancer Institute Hereditary Cancer Program, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA;
| | | | - Maria C. Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-61-207-04-30
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Soriano CT, McGarrity TJ, Zhu J, Loloi J, Peiffer LP, Cooper J. An Electronic Questionnaire to Survey Colorectal Cancer Screening Status and Identify High-Risk Cohorts in Large Health Care Organizations. Am J Med Qual 2020; 36:163-170. [PMID: 32605378 DOI: 10.1177/1062860620937236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Though improved screening practices have reduced the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates continue to be suboptimal. This is especially true of high-risk individuals, who are difficult for clinicians to identify during a typical health care encounter. The authors developed an electronic patient questionnaire that determined an individual's CRC screening status and identified high-risk individuals. The questionnaire was administered to employees through the Department of Human Resources. The response rate was 44.7%; 81.2% of respondents aged ≥50 years were up-to-date on CRC screening; 878 high-risk individuals were identified, 77.7% of whom were up-to-date on CRC screening. However, among high-risk individuals aged 40 to 49 years, only 45.8% reported up-to-date CRC screening. The questionnaire was effective in measuring CRC screening rates and identifying high-risk individuals. Dissemination by the Department of Human Resources was novel, effective, and was not dependent on a health care encounter to assess screening or high-risk status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T Soriano
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li M, Yeh YL, Sun H, Chang B, Chen LS. Community-Based Participatory Research: a Family Health History-Based Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program Among Chinese Americans. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:485-492. [PMID: 30779027 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-1486-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Asian Americans are the fastest growing racial/ethnic group in the USA, as this population increased by 72% between 2000 and 2015. Chinese Americans are the largest Asian subgroup, with a high immigrant proportion (63%), a high poverty rate (14%), and a large percentage of low English competency (41%). Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and cause of cancer death among Chinese Americans. As CRC has a genetic predisposition, family health history (FHH) has been proposed as a preventive tool to stratify CRC risk and guide personalized screening and behavioral modifications. The purpose of this study was to adopt a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to develop the first culturally and linguistically appropriate FHH-based CRC prevention program for Chinese Americans in Texas. The program development involved five CBPR steps: (1) establishment of partnership and research team, (2) literature review and needs assessment, (3) creation of a theoretical framework of the FHH-based CRC prevention, (4) development a culturally and linguistically appropriate intervention, and (5) program evaluation. Key components of this program included two intervention activities: (1) a culturally and linguistically appropriate FHH-based CRC prevention workshop and (2) a follow-up individualized phone consultation and health insurance enrollment and navigation services (if needed). The pilot study suggested feasibility of the program. This CBPR-grounded, FHH-based CRC prevention project can serve as a model for future cancer prevention programs targeting other types of cancers that also have FHH components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Yu-Lyu Yeh
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Helen Sun
- Light & Salt Association, 9800 Town Park Dr #255, Houston, TX, 77036, USA
| | - Barbara Chang
- Light & Salt Services Austin, 13010 Research Blvd #224, Austin, TX, 78750, USA
| | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Conley CC, Ketcher D, Reblin M, Kasting ML, Cragun D, Kim J, Ashing KT, Knott CL, Hughes-Halbert C, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST. The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:410-422. [PMID: 31912597 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer among younger Black women, genetic testing outcomes remain severely understudied among Blacks. Past research on disclosure of genetic testing results to family members has disproportionately focused on White, educated, high socioeconomic status women. This study addresses this gap in knowledge by assessing (a) to whom Black women disclose genetic test results and (b) if patterns of disclosure vary based on test result (e.g., BRCA1/2 positive, negative, variant of uncertain significance [VUS]). Black women (N = 149) with invasive breast cancer diagnosed age ≤50 years from 2009 to 2012 received free genetic testing through a prospective, population-based study. At 12 months post-testing, women reported with whom they shared their genetic test results. The exact test by binomial distribution was used to examine whether disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to male relatives, and logistic regression analyses tested for differences in disclosure to any female relative, any male relative, parents, siblings, children, and spouses by genetic test result. Most (77%) women disclosed their results to at least one family member. Disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to males (p < .001). Compared to those who tested negative or had a VUS, BRCA1/2-positive women were significantly less likely to disclose results to their daughters (ORBRCA positive = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07-0.94, p = .041) by 12 months post-genetic testing. Genetic test result did not predict any other type of disclosure (all ps > 0.12). Results suggest that in Black families, one benefit of genetic testing-to inform patients and their family about cancer risk information-is not being realized. To increase breast cancer preventive care among high-risk Black women, the oncology care team should prepare Black BRCA1/2-positive women to share genetic test results with family members and, in particular, their daughters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dana Ketcher
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maija Reblin
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kimlin Tam Ashing
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Knott
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taylor CO, Tarczy-Hornoch P. Personalized Medicine Implementation with Non-traditional Data Sources: A Conceptual Framework and Survey of the Literature. Yearb Med Inform 2019; 28:181-189. [PMID: 31419830 PMCID: PMC6697507 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With the explosive growth in availability of health data captured using non-traditional sources, the goal for this work was to evaluate the current biomedical literature on theory- driven studies investigating approaches that leverage non- traditional data in personalized medicine applications. METHODS We conducted a literature assessment guided by the personalized medicine unsolicited health information (pUHl) conceptual framework incorporating diffusion of innovations and task-technology fit theories. RESULTS The assessment provided an oveiview of the current literature and highlighted areas for future research. In particular, there is a need for: more research on the relationship between attributes of innovation and of societal structure on adoption; new study designs to enable flexible communication channels; more work to create and study approaches in healthcare settings; and more theory-driven studies with data-driven interventions. CONCLUSION This work introduces to an informatics audience an elaboration on personalized medicine implementation with non-traditional data sources by blending it with the pUHl conceptual framework to help explain adoption. We highlight areas to pursue future theory-driven research on personalized medicine applications that leverage non-traditional data sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Young AL, Butow PN, Rhodes P, Tucker KM, Williams R, Healey E, Wakefield CE. Talking across generations: Family communication about BRCA1
and BRCA2
genetic cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:516-532. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Luk Young
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
| | - Phyllis N. Butow
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Paul Rhodes
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Emma Healey
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital; Wollongong NSW Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health; University of New South Wales; Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Graves K, Gómez-Trillos S, Anderson L, Campos C, Evans C, Stearns S, Zhu Q, Gonzalez N, Sheppard VB. Provider's Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators for Latinas to Participate in Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2018; 6:healthcare6030116. [PMID: 30227649 PMCID: PMC6164735 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6030116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) referral to women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Latinas affected by breast cancer have the second highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations after Ashkenazi Jews. Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Latinas have lower GCRA uptake. While some studies have identified barriers for GCRA use in this population, few studies have focused on health care providers' perspectives. The purpose of the study was to examine providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators for at-risk Latina women to participate in GCRA and their experiences providing services to this population. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare providers (e.g., genetic counselors, patient navigators) recruited nationally through snowballing. Interviews were transcribed. Two coders independently coded each interview and then met to reconcile the codes using Consensual Qualitative Research guidelines. Providers identified several facilitators for GCRA uptake (e.g., family, treatment/prevention decisions) and barriers (e.g., cost, referrals, awareness, stigma). Genetic counselors described important aspects to consider when working with at-risk Latina including language barriers, obtaining accurate family histories, family communication, and testing relatives who live outside the US. Findings from this study can inform future interventions to enhance uptake and quality of GCRA in at-risk Latina women to reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Kristi Graves
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Sara Gómez-Trillos
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Lyndsay Anderson
- Department of Nursing, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819-6096, USA.
| | - Claudia Campos
- Nueva Vida, DC Office-Alexandria, 206 N. Washington St. Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
| | - Chalanda Evans
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Selma Stearns
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Qi Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Nathaly Gonzalez
- Capital Breast Cancer Center, 1000 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20003, USA.
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lin J, Marcum CS, Wilkinson AV, Koehly LM. Developing Shared Appraisals of Diabetes Risk Through Family Health History Feedback: The Case of Mexican-Heritage Families. Ann Behav Med 2018; 52:262-271. [PMID: 29538667 PMCID: PMC6693036 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kax037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Collecting complete and accurate family health history is critical to preventing type 2 diabetes. Purpose We seek to identify the optimal risk feedback approach that facilitates risk communication between parents and their adult children and helps them develop shared appraisals of family history of type 2 diabetes. Methods In a sample of parent-adult child dyads from 125 Mexican-heritage families residing in Houston, Texas, we examine change in parent-child dyadic (dis)agreement with respect to their shared family health history from baseline to 10 months after receipt of risk feedback generated by Family Healthware. A 2 × 2 factorial design is applied to test how the recipient (one parent or all family members) and the content (risk assessment with or without behavioral recommendations) of the feedback affect (dis)agreement through interpersonal ties, particularly dyadic risk communication. Results Providing risk assessment without behavioral recommendations to the parent, but not the adult child, shifts the dyads toward agreement (relative risk ratio [RRR]= 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.18-2.67]), by activating reciprocal risk communication between parents and children (RRR =2.70, 95% CI [1.81-4.03]). Dyads with close interpersonal ties are more likely to shift toward agreement (RRR = 3.09, 95% CI [1.89-5.07]). Conclusion Programs aimed at improving family health history knowledge and accuracy of reports should tailor risk feedback strategically for better intervention effect and leverage a network approach in disease prevention among at-risk minority and/or immigrant populations. Trial Registration Number NCT00469339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jielu Lin
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Laura M Koehly
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peipins LA, Rodriguez JL, Hawkins NA, Soman A, White MC, Hodgson ME, DeRoo LA, Sandler DP. Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 27:630-639. [PMID: 29377785 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women facing complex and uncertain situations such as cancer in their families may seek information from a variety of sources to gain knowledge about cancer risk and reduce uncertainty. We describe and assess the relative importance of information sources about familial breast cancer at the individual, family, and healthcare provider levels influencing women's reporting they had enough information to speak with daughters about breast cancer. This outcome we refer to as being informed about breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sister Study participants, a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer, were surveyed on family cancer history, family communication, social support, and interactions with healthcare providers (n = 11,766). Adjusted percentages and 95% confidence intervals for being informed about breast cancer versus not being informed were computed for individual-, family-, and provider-level characteristics in three steps using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS We found 65% of women reported being informed about breast cancer while 35% did not. Having a trusted person with whom to discuss cancer concerns, having a lower versus higher perceived risk of breast cancer, having undergone genetic counseling, and being satisfied with physician discussions about breast cancer in their families were predictors of being informed about breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although acquiring objective risk information, such as through genetic counseling, may contribute to a basic level of understanding, communication with providers and within other trusted relationships appears to be an essential component in women's reporting they had all the information they need to talk with their daughters about breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Peipins
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- 2 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Disease Promotion, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ashwini Soman
- 3 Northrop Grumman Corporation , Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary C White
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Lisa A DeRoo
- 5 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
| | - Dale P Sandler
- 6 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Moss HA, Samimi G, Havrilesky LJ, Sherman ME, Myers ER. Estimating the number of potential family members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in a "Traceback" approach. Genet Epidemiol 2017; 42:117-122. [PMID: 29193313 DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
U.S. guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 mutation testing for women diagnosed with high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) to increase recognition of carriers, but most remain unidentified and at risk. Accordingly, an approach termed "Traceback" has been proposed in which probands are retrospectively identified by testing archived pathology specimens, and family members are traced to provide genetic counseling and testing. We used population-based data to estimate the number of family members who might be contacted through such a program. We used incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to estimate the number of women diagnosed with HGOC from 2005 to 2016, and census data to estimate the number of spouses, offspring, and siblings (both sexes). Using overall survival for HGOC from SEER and all-cause mortality rates from the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, we estimated the number of patients, spouses, offspring, and siblings of HGOC cases living in 2017. Due to the high mortality rate of HGOC, consent from living probands may be possible in only 42% of the cases; consent to test pathology specimens would need to be sought from next of kin for the remainder. In 2017, an estimated 406,919 living next of kin (spouses, siblings, offspring) would be available for potential consent. Testing archived ovarian cancer pathology specimens may enable the identification of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but consent from next of kin would be required in in 58% of cases. Although Traceback offers the possibility of identifying unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, pilot feasibility studies that include assessment of methods to secure consent are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1179-1196. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0125-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
27
|
Bowen DJ, Albrecht T, Hay J, Eggly S, Harris-Wei J, Meischke H, Burke W. Communication Among Melanoma Family Members. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 22:198-204. [PMID: 28248624 PMCID: PMC5592097 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1259374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Interventions to improve communication among family members may facilitate information flow about familial risk and preventive health behaviors. This is a secondary analysis of the effects of an interactive website intervention aimed at increasing communication frequency and agreement about health risk among melanoma families. Participants were family units, consisting of one family member with melanoma identified from a previous research study (the Case) and an additional first degree relative and a parent of a child 0-17. Family triads were randomized to receive access to the website intervention or to serve as control families. Family communication frequency and agreement about melanoma prevention behaviors and beliefs were measured at baseline and again at 1 year post randomization. Intervention participants of all three types significantly increased the frequency of communication to their first degree relatives (Parents, siblings, children; range = 14-18 percentage points; all p < .05). At baseline, approximately two-thirds of all three family members talked with at least some member of the family about cancer risk. Agreement between Cases and First Degree Relatives and between Cases and Parents increased from pre to post intervention in the intervention participants compared to the control participants (p < .05). These findings provide support for interventions to improve family communication about cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Bowen
- a Department of Bioethics and Humanities , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Terrance Albrecht
- b Department of Communication and Behavioral Oncology , Karamos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA
| | - Jennifer Hay
- c Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA
| | - Susan Eggly
- b Department of Communication and Behavioral Oncology , Karamos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA
| | - Julie Harris-Wei
- d Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA
| | - Hendrika Meischke
- e Department of Health Services , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Wylie Burke
- a Department of Bioethics and Humanities , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rodríguez VM, Corona R, Bodurtha JN, Quillin JM. Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21:346-55. [PMID: 26735646 PMCID: PMC4852547 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1080328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Family health history about cancer is an important prevention and health promotion tool. Yet few studies have identified family context factors that promote such discussions. We explored relations among family context (cohesion, flexibility, and openness), self-efficacy, and cancer communication (gathering family history, sharing cancer risk information, and frequency) in a diverse group of women enrolled in a randomized control trial. Baseline survey data for 472 women were analyzed. The women's average age was 34 years, 59% identified as Black, 31% had graduated high school, and 75% reported a family history of any cancer. Results showed that greater family cohesion and flexibility were related to higher communication frequency and sharing cancer information. Women who reported greater self-efficacy were more likely to have gathered family history, shared cancer risk information, and communicated more frequently with relatives. Openness was not associated with communication but was related to greater family cohesion and flexibility. Adjusting for demographic variables, self-efficacy, and family cohesion significantly predicted communication frequency. Women with higher self-efficacy were also more likely to have gathered family health history about cancer and shared cancer risk information. Future research may benefit from considering family organization and self-efficacy when developing psychosocial theories that in turn inform cancer prevention interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian M. Rodríguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Rosalie Corona
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University
| | - Joann N. Bodurtha
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
| | - John M. Quillin
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang C, Sen A, Plegue M, Ruffin MT, O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Acheson LS. Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr). Prev Med 2015; 77:28-34. [PMID: 25901453 PMCID: PMC4508012 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2014] [Revised: 04/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. METHODS A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) in the United States from 2005-7. The trial employed a two-arm cluster-randomized design, with primary care practices serving as the unit of randomization. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE), analyses focused on communication behaviors at 6month follow-up, adjusting for age, site and practice clustering. RESULTS A significant interaction was observed between study arm and baseline communication status for the family communication outcomes (p's<.01), indicating that intervention had effects of different magnitude between those already communicating at baseline and those who were not. Among participants who were not communicating at baseline, intervention participants had higher odds of communicating with family members about family history risk (OR=1.24, p=0.042) and actively collecting family history information at follow-up (OR=2.67, p=0.026). Family Healthware™ did not have a significant effect on family communication among those already communicating at baseline, or on provider communication, regardless of baseline communication status. Greater communication was observed among those at increased familial risk for a greater number of diseases. CONCLUSION Family Healthware™ prompted more communication about family history with family members, among those who were not previously communicating. Efforts are needed to identify approaches to encourage greater sharing of family history information, particularly with health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharine Wang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
| | - Ananda Sen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Melissa Plegue
- Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Mack T Ruffin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Suzanne M O'Neill
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
| | - Wendy S Rubinstein
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Louise S Acheson
- Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health and Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|