Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System

Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19

PURPOSE

Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19.

RESULTS

One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01).

DISCUSSION

Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.

Increasing Access to Contraception: Examining Barriers and Facilitators of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Objective(s): To identify barriers and facilitators related to reimbursement processes, device acquisition costs, stocking, and supply of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) from 27 jurisdictions (26 states/1 territory) participating in the Increasing Access to Contraception Learning Community from 2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study using qualitative data collected through 27 semistructured key informant interviews was conducted during the final year of the learning community among all jurisdictional teams. Excerpts were extracted and coded by theme, then summarized as barriers or facilitators using implementation science methods. Results: Most jurisdictions (89%) identified barriers to reimbursement processes, device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC devices, and 85% of jurisdictions identified facilitators for these domains. Payment methodology challenges and lack of billing and coding processes were identified as the most common barriers to reimbursement processes. Device acquisition cost challenges and lack of delivery facility protocols for billing were the most common barriers to device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC. The most common facilitator of reimbursement processes was expanded payment methodology options, whereas supplemental funding for acquisition costs and protocol development were identified as the most common facilitators of device acquisition, stocking, and supply. Conclusion: Revised payment methodologies and broader health systems changes including additional funding sources and protocols for billing, stocking, and supply were used by learning community jurisdictions to address identified barriers. The learning community framework offers a forum for information exchange, peer-to-peer learning, and sharing of best practices to support jurisdictions in addressing identified barriers and facilitators affecting contraception access.

Provision of contraceptives by Brazilian general gynaecologists: a nationwide online survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the provision of contraceptives by Brazilian obstetricians and gynaecologists (Obst/Gyns) during medical consultation and associated factors.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was conducted with Obst/Gyns regarding age, gender, training, method counselling about and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

RESULTS

Of 16,000 Obst/Gyns, 610 (3.8%) answered the survey. After multiple regression analysis, female Obst/Gyns (reference) (OR male was 0.53 [95%CI 0.28-0.98], p = 0.044) and Obst/Gyns aged between 20 and 39 were more likely to provide an IUD. For hormonal-IUDs, Obst/Gyns who had had theoretical training in hormonal-IUD insertion (reference no training) (OR = 2.13 [95%CI 1.14-3.99], p = 0.018), those who work in a private facility or public hospital, and those that allowed more time during consultations (reference) (OR short time = 0.33 [95%CI 0.17-0.63], p < 0.001) were more likely to provide them. Obst/Gyns who were hands-on trained were more likely to provide subdermal implant (OR = 2.04 [95%CI 1.45-2.87], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a gap between theoretical and practical training received by this cohort of Obst/Gyns regarding LARCs, mainly contraceptive implants and hormonal-IUDs. The identification of barriers to offering contraceptives is essential to providing client-centred contraceptive care.

Single-visit insertion of long-acting reversible contraception in a single health system

OBJECTIVE

To identify patient and practice characteristics associated with single-visit placement of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) across the University of North Carolina Health system.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective observational study using existing electronic health records. We abstracted data from charts of individuals ages 15-50 years who received a LARC device between March 15, 2019, and March 14, 2021. Our primary outcome was whether a patient received LARC at one, or after multiple, outpatient visits. We used descriptive statistics to examine patient, clinician, and practice characteristics. We used bivariate analysis and generalized estimating equation to examine relationships between characteristics and single-visit LARC receipt.

RESULTS

Most of the 4599 individuals received care at obstetrics and gynecology clinics (3411/4599; 74%), and received their LARC device in a single visit (3163/4599; 69%). More intrauterine devices (3151) were placed than implants (1448). The adjusted odds of receiving a LARC in a single visit was highest for those who self-paid (aOR (adjusted odds ratio) 1.83, 1.19-2.82) and those who received an implant (aOR 1.25, 1.07-1.46). Patients seen by advanced practice practitioners (aOR 0.67, 0.56-0.80) or by an internal medicine specialty clinician (aOR 0.13, 0.00-0.35) had lower odds of receiving a single-visit LARC compared to those seen by a specialist obstetrician-gynecologist physician.

CONCLUSION

Most single-visit LARC placements were performed by clinicians in obstetrician-gynecologist specialty practices.

IMPLICATIONS

Among individuals seeking long-acting reversible contraceptives from clinics in a single health system in North Carolina, most received a device at a single visit and most single-visit insertions were done by an obstetrician-gynecologist.

Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative

BACKGROUND

Same-day placement of long-acting reversible contraceptives, occurring when the device is requested and placed within a single visit, reduces barriers to the patient and reduces unintended pregnancies. Despite the safety and efficacy of same-day placement, access to same-day services remains low.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now initiative, a statewide initiative in Delaware focused on increasing same-day access to effective contraception on same-day receipt of long-acting reversible contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

We used Medicaid claims and encounter data to identify instances of same-day and multivisit receipts of long-acting reversible contraceptives among Medicaid-enrolled individuals in Delaware and Maryland aged 15-44 years who were covered in a full-benefits or family planning Medicaid aid category during the month of the placement and the 2 previous months. We used a difference-in-differences design that compared changes in the outcome from before to after implementation of the initiative among placements at agencies that participated in the initiative (n=6676) vs 2 alternative comparison groups: placements at Delaware agencies that did not participate (n=688) and placements in Maryland (n=35,847).

RESULTS

We found that the intervention was associated with a 13.3 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 1.9%-24.7%) in receipt of same-day long-acting reversible contraceptives using a nonparticipating Delaware comparison group, a 21.1 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 13.7%-28.6%) using a Maryland comparison group, and a 21.0 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 14.1%-27.9%) using a pooled comparison group. The effects were larger for implants than intrauterine devices.

CONCLUSION

The Delaware Contraceptive Access Now initiative substantially increased the number of patients receiving long-acting reversible contraceptives through a single-visit encounter. Our findings suggested that coordinated interventions involving provider and staff training and capital investments that seed device stocking can increase the number of patients receiving same-day long-acting reversible contraceptives.

The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal

Patient-centered care (PCC) is frequently recommended to improve healthcare outcomes in the United States. Despite its purported benefits, little research explores how and to what extent providers implement this model in their care. We examine such processes through the case of contraception, specifically, "early" removals of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). In-depth interviews with 51 healthcare providers reveal that while providers describe embracing patient-centeredness when considering patients' early LARC removal requests, their implementation ironically sidelines patient preferences and needs. Rather than be responsive to patients' requests, all providers in the study resist early LARC removal by: withholding information about self-removal of intrauterine devices (IUDs); negotiating with patients to keep their device longer; setting subjective timelines to prolong LARC use; and/or engaging in delay tactics to wear down patients' resolve for removal. Furthermore, beyond simply resisting LARC removal requests using these strategies, providers purposively employ tenets of PCC to sway patients away from removal. In other words, providers utilize PCC as a means to undermine it. Understanding how providers implement patient-centered care reveals the challenges to doing so, even in cases like early LARC removal where providers indicate patient-centeredness is a priority. It also elucidates the need for enhanced training, specificity, and institutionalization around patient-centered models of care; informs interventions that promote LARC use among patients; as well as offers opportunities for improving patient-provider exchanges generally.

Invited Commentary: Medicaid Policy and Pregnancy Outcomes-Toward a Reproductive Autonomy Framework

The Medicaid program covers more than 70 million people and is the largest single health insurance payer for pregnancy and delivery in the United States. In this issue of the Journal, Margerison et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(8):1488-1498) investigate the extent to which expansion of Medicaid coverage to nonpregnant low-income adults under the Affordable Care Act may have improved prepregnancy or birth outcomes. They found that Medicaid expansions by states were not associated with changes in prepregnancy health, including smoking and obesity. Similarly, there were no changes in preterm birth or small or large size for gestational age attributable to Medicaid expansion. Results were consistent across a range of model specifications and with allowance for different lag times between Medicaid expansion and pregnancy. The results are consistent with prior research finding that pregnancy-specific Medicaid expansions did not uniformly translate to improved pregnancy and birth outcomes. Results should be interpreted in light of the limited contribution that medical services make to overall health and well-being. To reduce the high rates of adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes in the United States, Medicaid policy must move toward a reproductive autonomy framework that shifts the focus away from pregnancy-specific benefits and toward a comprehensive and patient-empowering reproductive health paradigm.

Awareness of the option of IUC self-removal among US adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To assess adolescent awareness of the safety of self-removal of intrauterine contraception (IUC) and explore associations with sociodemographic characteristics, IUC knowledge, and personal experience using an IUC.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited women aged 15 to 20 years from 21 U.S. states and Washington, D.C. Participants completed an online survey assessing their communication with peers about contraception and knowledge and use of IUCs.

RESULTS

Few (11%, 95% CI 9%-13%) adolescents knew that IUC self-removal is safe, whether or not they had personally used an IUC (14% vs 8%, p = 0.01). Knowledge that IUCs do not protect users from sexually transmitted infections (99% vs 91%, p < 0.001) and that IUCs can be removed early (99% vs 88%, p < 0.001) was higher among adolescents who had used an IUC than those who had not. Knowledge that IUC use does not adversely affect fertility after IUC removal (86% vs 63%, p < 0.001) and that IUCs are more effective than birth control pills (82% vs 50%, p < 0.001) also differed by personal experience with an IUC. Awareness of the safety of IUC self-removal was not associated with overall knowledge of IUCs. However, adolescents who knew that IUCs are more effective than birth control pills were more likely to be aware of the safety of IUC self-removal (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent women in the U.S. possess incomplete knowledge of many important aspects of IUC use, and awareness of the safety of IUC self-removal is particularly low, even among those who have used an IUC.

IMPLICATIONS

Efforts to increase adolescent knowledge of IUC should include information about the safety of IUC self-removal in order to safeguard adolescents' reproductive autonomy.