1
|
Yasen A, Feng J, Dai TX, Zhu CH, Liang RB, Liao ZH, Li K, Cai YH, Wang GY. Management of anastomotic biliary stricture through utilizing percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e868-e877. [PMID: 38548547 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
AIM Occurrence of anastomotic biliary stricture (AS) remains an essential issue following hepatobiliary surgeries, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) has great therapeutic significance in handling refractory AS for patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy after cholangio-jejunostomy. This present study aimed to investigate feasibility of PTCS procedures in AS patients for therapeutic indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study with a total number of 124 consecutive patients who received therapeutic PTCS due to AS. Clinical success rate, required number, and adverse events of therapeutic PTCS procedures as well as patients survival state were reviewed. RESULTS These 124 patients previously underwent choledochojejunostomy or hepatico-jejunostomy, and there was post-surgical altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Overall, 366 therapeutic PTCS procedures were performed for these patients through applying rigid choledochoscope, and the median time of PTCS procedures was 3 (1-11). Among these patients, there were 34 cases (27.32%) accompanied by biliary strictures and 100 cases (80.65%) were also combined with biliary calculi. After therapeutic PTCS, most patients presented with relieved clinical manifestations and improved liver functions. The median time of follow-up was 26 months (2-86 months), and AS was successfully managed through PTCS procedures in 104 patients (83.87%). During the follow-up period, adverse events occurred in 81 cases (65.32%), most of which were tackled through supportive treatment. CONCLUSION PTCS was a feasible, safe and effective therapeutic modality for refractory AS, which may be a promising alternative approach in clinical cases where the gastrointestinal anatomy was changed after cholangio-jejunostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimaiti Yasen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Jun Feng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Tian-Xing Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Can-Hua Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Run-Bin Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Zhi-Hong Liao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Yu-Hong Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Guo-Ying Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghirardelli L, Beneduce AA, Gusmini S. A Rare Case of Small Bowel Obstruction due to Migration of a Percutaneous Biliary Stent. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2024; 12:23247096241238527. [PMID: 38646799 PMCID: PMC11036911 DOI: 10.1177/23247096241238527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Biliary endoprostheses are widely used in the treatment of biliary lithiasis, malignant and benign strictures, and occasionally in long-lasting biliary fistulas. They can be placed endoscopically during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and radiologically (percutaneous) when the endoscopic route is not feasible. Complications associated with the endoscopic placement of biliary endoprostheses are well described in the literature, with migration being the most common. Intestinal obstruction is a rare complication associated with the migration of these devices. There are no reports in the literature of this complication occurring after percutaneous placement. We present a case of a patient who arrived at the emergency department with ileal obstruction secondary to the migration and concurrent embedding of a covered stent placed radiologically to treat a biliary leak after surgery. The patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopic and ileal resection, revealing a lithiasic concretion at the tip of the stent, causing the small bowel obstruction.
Collapse
|
3
|
Medas R, Ferreira-Silva J, Girotra M, Barakat M, Tabibian JH, Rodrigues-Pinto E. Best Practices in Pancreatico-biliary Stenting and EUS-guided Drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:553-568. [PMID: 36040964 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Indications for endoscopic placement of endoluminal and transluminal stents have greatly expanded over time. Endoscopic stent placement is now a well-established approach for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary and pancreatic diseases (ie, obstructive jaundice, intra-abdominal fluid collections, chronic pancreatitis etc.). Ongoing refinement of technical approaches and development of novel stents is increasing the applicability and success of pancreatico-biliary stenting. In this review, we discuss the important developments in the field of pancreatico-biliary stenting, with a specific focus on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-associated developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Medas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Joel Ferreira-Silva
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mohit Girotra
- Digestive Health Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - James H Tabibian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar
- UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA CA
| | - Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bowen H, Wenzhi G, Peihao W, Jihua S, Shuijun Z. The reasonable therapeutic modality for biliary duct-to-duct anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation: ERCP or PTC? Front Oncol 2022; 12:1035722. [PMID: 36249014 PMCID: PMC9554635 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1035722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the initial success rate, feasibility, and effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) for anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation (LT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data collected during January 2015 to December 2021 from liver transplantation recipients who developed anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation and treated by ERCP and/or PTC. The success rate, complications and patients’ survival rate of ERCP and PTC procedures was evaluated. Results Forty-eight patients who underwent LT and were confirmed to have the anastomotic biliary stricture were enrolled. Overall, 48/48 patients underwent single or multiple ERCP procedures as the first line therapy; 121 therapeutic ERCPs (3.36 ± 2.53 ERCPs per patient) were performed in 36/48 patients successfully. All the 12 patients who failed ERCP tend to have special bile duct conditions such as overlong, angle shaped, and/or extremely narrowed bile duct and underwent PTC as an alternative treatment. The initial success rate of ERCP was 75% (36/48) while the success rate of ERCP for the 12 patients with special bile duct was 0% (0/12). PTC was an effective second-line treatment for those 12 patients who failed ERCP, and 58.33% (7 of 12 cases) were treated successfully. The average procedure time in PTC group was significantly lower than ERCP group (t=2.292, P=0.027). The feasibility of ERCP was associated with the anatomical shape of bile duct and the severity of the stricture site. Finally, the cumulative survival rate was 100% (12/12) in PTC group compared to 86.11% (31/36) in ERCP group (χ2 =0.670, P=0.413). Conclusion ERCP is the gold standard method for the diagnosis and effective intervention for the management of biliary complications after LT. However, its use in certain types of biliary complications (e.g., patients with severe anastomotic biliary stricture and those with overlong and angle shaped bile ducts) is not promising and associated with significant risk of complications. PTC and other interventions should be studied along with ERCP for patients for whom ERCP may not work. The feasibility and efficacy of primary management can be predicted by the noninvasive imaging examinations like Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) before the procedure, which may help with the choice of the most reasonable therapeutic modality and avoiding unnecessary financial burden and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Bowen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Digestive Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Guo Wenzhi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Digestive Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wen Peihao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Digestive Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shi Jihua
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Digestive Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhang Shuijun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Digestive Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Zhang Shuijun,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirstein MM, Voigtländer T. Endoskopisches Management von Gallengangskomplikationen nach Leberchirurgie. Zentralbl Chir 2022; 147:398-406. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1857-5775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungBiliäre Komplikationen stellen häufige Komplikationen nach Leberchirurgie dar und tragen wesentlich zur postoperativen Morbidität und Mortalität bei. Den größten Anteil dieser
machen Gallengangsleckagen und -strikturen aus, wobei die Leckagen nach Cholezystektomie und Leberresektion dominieren und die Strikturen ein wesentliches Problem nach
Lebertransplantationen darstellen. Patienten nach orthotoper Lebertransplantation stellen besonders vulnerable Patienten dar, deren biliäre Komplikationen von denen nach
Cholezystektomie und Leberresektion differieren und niederschwellig sowie mit größter Vorsicht behandelt werden müssen. Mit der endoskopischen retrograden Cholangiografie steht ein
exzellentes Verfahren zur Behandlung dieser Komplikationen zur Verfügung. Die therapeutischen Möglichkeiten beinhalten die endoskopische Sphinkterotomie, die Anlage von Prothesen
und Dilatationen. Mittels dieser Verfahren können Erfolgsraten in bis zu 90% der Fälle erreicht werden. Bei Hepatikojejunostomien bestehen alternative Interventionsmöglichkeiten
wie die ballon- oder motorunterstützte antegrade Enteroskopie, die perkutan-transhepatische Cholangiodrainage oder mit zunehmendem Einsatz die endosonografisch gestützten
Verfahren.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Torsten Voigtländer
- Gastroenterologie, Deutsches Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus Clementinenhaus Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yılmaz* S. ERCP licence in the context of medical practices, legal regulations, medical ethics and patient’s rights in our country. Turk J Surg 2022; 38:1-4. [DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive endoscopic procedure mainly used for hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. Although it was first developed by a surgeon, McCune, there is still debate on who can perform this procedure. This problem, which actually needs to be solved within medical ethics, has been brought to the courts, and lawsuits have been filed against general surgeons to prevent them from performing ERCP. The current situation in our country demonstrates that 50-70% of ERCP procedures are performed by general surgeons. In regions where there are not enough gastroenterology specialists, only general surgeons perform this procedure. Today, general surgeons have hundreds of articles on ERCP procedures and studies accepted as international guideline. ERCP procedure -which is in fact a surgical procedure- is included in hepatobiliary surgical procedures in the general surgery core training schedule. General surgeons receive ERCP education in a 6-month challenging program at centers accredited by the Turkish Surgical Society. The problem of ERCP license cannot be solved by legal authorities but by medical, ethical and deontological discussions. Our recommendation here is that the Ministry of Health should associate this procedure with a specific legislation, just like in endoscopy, and establish a specific ERCP training program accepted for license. In this article, the problem of who should perform ERCP was discussed within the framework of legal legislation, medical doctrine and realities of our country.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagra N, Klair JS, Jayaraj M, Murali AR, Singh D, Law J, Larsen M, Irani S, Kozarek R, Ross A, Krishnamoorthi R. Biliary Sphincterotomy Alone versus Biliary Stent with or without Biliary Sphincterotomy for the Management of Post-Cholecystectomy Bile Leak: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis 2022; 40:810-815. [PMID: 35130543 DOI: 10.1159/000522328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic therapy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is considered the first-line treatment in the management of post-cholecystectomy bile leak (PCBL). Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective endoscopic intervention for PCBL. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of the two interventional groups (biliary sphincterotomy [BS] alone vs. biliary stent ± BS) in management of PCBL. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings (from inception through January 2021). The primary outcome was to compare the pooled rate of clinical success between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was to estimate the pooled rate of adverse events. RESULTS The pooled rate of clinical success with BS alone (5 studies, 299 patients) was 88% (95% confidence interval (CI): 84-92%, I2: 0%) and for biliary stent ± BS (5 studies, 864 patients) was 97% (CI: 93-100%, I2: 79%). The rate of clinical success in biliary stent ± BS group was significantly higher than BS alone group (OR: 3.91 95% CI: 2.29-6.69, p < 0.001, I2: 13%). The rate of adverse events was numerically lower in biliary stent ± BS group compared to BS alone (3 studies; OR: 0.65 95% CI: 0.41-1.03, p = 0.07) without statistical significance. Low heterogeneity was noted in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Biliary stent ± BS is more effective in endoscopic management of PCBL compared to BS alone. This may be related to inter-endoscopist variation in completeness of sphincterotomy and post-sphincterotomy edema, which can influence the preferential trans-papillary flow of bile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navroop Nagra
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jagpal Singh Klair
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA,
| | - Mahendran Jayaraj
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Arvind R Murali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, Iowa, USA
| | - Dhruv Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joanna Law
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Michael Larsen
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shayan Irani
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew Ross
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de'Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, Coccolini F, Martínez-Pérez A, Romeo OM, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Brustia R, Rhaiem R, Piardi T, Conticchio M, Marchegiani F, Beghdadi N, Abu-Zidan FM, Alikhanov R, Allard MA, Allievi N, Amaddeo G, Ansaloni L, Andersson R, Andolfi E, Azfar M, Bala M, Benkabbou A, Ben-Ishay O, Bianchi G, Biffl WL, Brunetti F, Carra MC, Casanova D, Celentano V, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Bini R, Coimbra R, Luigi de'Angelis G, Decembrino F, De Palma A, de Reuver PR, Domingo C, Cotsoglou C, Ferrero A, Fraga GP, Gaiani F, Gheza F, Gurrado A, Harrison E, Henriquez A, Hofmeyr S, Iadarola R, Kashuk JL, Kianmanesh R, Kirkpatrick AW, Kluger Y, Landi F, Langella S, Lapointe R, Le Roy B, Luciani A, Machado F, Maggi U, Maier RV, Mefire AC, Hiramatsu K, Ordoñez C, Patrizi F, Planells M, Peitzman AB, Pekolj J, Perdigao F, Pereira BM, Pessaux P, Pisano M, Puyana JC, Rizoli S, Portigliotti L, Romito R, Sakakushev B, Sanei B, Scatton O, Serradilla-Martin M, Schneck AS, Sissoko ML, Sobhani I, Ten Broek RP, Testini M, Valinas R, Veloudis G, Vitali GC, Weber D, Zorcolo L, Giuliante F, Gavriilidis P, Fuks D, Sommacale D. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:30. [PMID: 34112197 PMCID: PMC8190978 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Strada Prov. 127 Acquaviva - Santeramo Km. 4, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti BA, Bari, Italy. .,Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France.
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Oreste M Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive, et Métabolique, Centre hospitalier de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, Saint Germain en Laye, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.,Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Troyes Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Maria Conticchio
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nassiba Beghdadi
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Shosse Enthusiastov, 86, 111123, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Niccolò Allievi
- 1st Surgical Unit, Department of Emergency, Papa Giovanni Hospital XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Service d'Hepatologie, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery, San Matteo University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Andolfi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Mohammad Azfar
- Department of Surgery, Al Rahba Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amine Benkabbou
- Surgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Offir Ben-Ishay
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Giorgio Bianchi
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Strada Prov. 127 Acquaviva - Santeramo Km. 4, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti BA, Bari, Italy
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | | | - Daniel Casanova
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Colorectal Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Emergency and General Surgery Department, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bini
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC and Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Gian Luigi de'Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Decembrino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea De Palma
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Domingo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Federico Gheza
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Department of Clinical Surgery and Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Stefan Hofmeyr
- Division of Surgery, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Tygerberg Academic Hospital, University of Stellenbosch Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Roberta Iadarola
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Jeffry L Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv University, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Department of Surgery, Critical Care Medicine and the Regional Trauma Service, Foothills Medical Center, Calgari, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Real Lapointe
- Department of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Unit of Radiology, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Fernando Machado
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, School of Medicine UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Umberto Maggi
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alain Chichom Mefire
- Department of Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynecologic, Regional Hospital, Limbe, Cameroon
| | - Kazuhiro Hiramatsu
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan
| | - Carlos Ordoñez
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fundacion Valle del Lili, Universidad del Valle Cali, Cali, Colombia
| | - Franca Patrizi
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuel Planells
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, UPMC, University of Pittsburg, School of Medicine, Pittsburg, USA
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery, Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fabiano Perdigao
- Liver Transplant Unit, APHP, Unité de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Transplantation hépatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Bruno M Pereira
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Visceral and Digestive Surgery, IHU mix-surg, Institute for Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1st Surgical Unit, Department of Emergency, Papa Giovanni Hospital XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Juan Carlos Puyana
- Trauma & Acute Care Surgery - Global Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Trauma and Acute Care Service, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luca Portigliotti
- Chirurgia Epato-Gastro-Pancreatica, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Raffaele Romito
- Chirurgia Epato-Gastro-Pancreatica, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Behnam Sanei
- Department of Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Liver Transplant Unit, APHP, Unité de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Transplantation hépatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Anne-Sophie Schneck
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Guadeloupe, Pointe-À-Pitre, Les Avymes, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Mohammed Lamine Sissoko
- Service de Chirurgie, Hôpital National Blaise Compaoré de Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Iradj Sobhani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Richard P Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Testini
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Valinas
- Department of Surgery "F", Faculty of Medicine, Clinic Hospital "Dr. Manuel Quintela", Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Giulio Cesare Vitali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Luigi Zorcolo
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HBP Surgery, Imperial College HealthCare, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - David Fuks
- Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Flumignan VK, Sachdev AH, Nunes JPS, Silva PF, Pires LHB, Andreoti MM. SPHINCTEROTOMY ALONE VERSUS SPHINCTEROTOMY AND BILIARY STENT PLACEMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF BILE LEAKS: 10 YEAR EXPERIENCE AT A QUATERNARY HOSPITAL. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2021; 58:71-76. [PMID: 33909800 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatobiliary surgery and hepatic trauma are frequent causes of bile leaks and this feared complication can be safely managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The approach consists of sphincterotomy alone, biliary stenting or a combination of the two but the optimal form remains unclear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare sphincterotomy alone versus sphincterotomy plus biliary stent placement in the treatment of post-surgical and traumatic bile leaks. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with the final ERCP diagnosis of "bile leak". Data collected included patient demographics, etiology of the leak and the procedure details. The treatment techniques were divided into two groups: sphincterotomy alone vs. sphincterotomy plus biliary stenting. We evaluated the volume of the abdominal surgical drain before and after each procedure and the number of days needed until cessation of drainage post ERCP. RESULTS A total of 31 patients (18 men and 3 women; mean age, 51 years) with bile leaks were evaluated. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was the etiology of the leak in 14 (45%) cases, followed by conventional cholecystectomy in 9 (29%) patients, hepatic trauma in 5 (16%) patients, and hepatectomy secondary to neoplasia in 3 (9.7%) patients. The most frequent location of the leaks was the cystic duct stump with 12 (38.6%) cases, followed by hepatic common duct in 10 (32%) cases, common bile duct in 7 (22%) cases and the liver bed in 2 (6.5%) cases. 71% of the patients were treated with sphincterotomy plus biliary stenting, and 29% with sphincterotomy alone. There was significant difference between the volume drained before and after both procedures (P<0.05). However, when comparing sphincterotomy alone and sphincterotomy plus biliary stenting, regarding the volume drained and the days needed to cessation of drainage, there was no statistical difference in both cases (P>0.005). CONCLUSION ERCP remains the first line treatment for bile leaks with no difference between sphincterotomy alone vs sphincterotomy plus stent placement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Trauma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:14-23. [PMID: 31605872 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Trauma affects all sociodemographic profiles and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality particularly in patients less than forty years of age. A variety of endoscopic tools and techniques initially used for iatrogenic etiologies (post-operative bile or pancreatic duct leaks, intra-procedural perforation) have been adopted for use in the gastrointestinal trauma victim. The purpose of this review is to highlight a variety of gastrointestinal traumatic complications where endoscopy can serve a complement and/or definitive management strategy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rio-Tinto R, Canena J. Endoscopic Treatment of Post-Cholecystectomy Biliary Leaks. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 28:265-273. [PMID: 34386554 DOI: 10.1159/000511527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Postcholecystectomy leaks may occur in 0.3-2.7% of patients. Bile leaks associated with laparoscopy are often more complex and difficult to treat than those occurring after open cholecystectomy. Furthermore, their incidence has remained unchanged despite improvements in laparoscopic training and technological developments. The management of biliary leaks has evolved from surgery into a minimally invasive endoscopic procedural approach, namely, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which decreases or eliminates the pressure gradient between the bile duct and the duodenum, thus creating a preferential transpapillary bile flow and allowing the leak to seal. For simple leaks, the success rate of endotherapy is remarkably high. However, there are more severe and complex leaks that require multiple endoscopic interventions, and clear strategies for endoscopic treatment have not emerged. Therefore, there is still some debate regarding the optimal time point at which to intervene, which technique to use (sphincterotomy alone or in association with the placement of stents, whether metallic or plastic stents should be used, and, if plastic stents are used, whether they should be single or multiple), how long the stents should remain in place, and when to consider treatment failure. Here, we review the types and classification of postoperative biliary injuries, particularly leaks, as well as the evidence for endoscopic treatment of the latter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Rio-Tinto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jorge Canena
- Centro de Gastrenterologia do Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School/Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNL, Lisbon, Portugal.,Serviço de Gastrenterologia do Hospital Amadora-Sintra, Amadora, Portugal.,Serviço de Gastrenterologia do Hospital de Santo António dos Capuchos - CHLC, Lisbon, Portugal.,Cintesis - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy-Role in Preliminary Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Tract Injuries. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 45:e1-e7. [PMID: 31789907 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was conducted to identify the role of hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) in the management of biliary tract injuries. METHODS We retrospectively studied 54 patients (28 male and 26 female patients) aged 3 to 78 years with evidence of bile leak on HBS performed between January 2015 and October 2017. Following intravenous injection of Tc-mebrofenin, dynamic images were acquired for 30 minutes followed by static images until 24 hours. SPECT/CT was performed in patients with suspicion of bile leak on the planar images. Patients were classified as those with free intraperitoneal or localized bile leak. Any abdominal drain output was documented, and its statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequent management was also documented. RESULTS Of the 54 patients, 28 demonstrated free intraperitoneal bile leak and 26 localized leak on HBS. Thirty-four patients (24 with free intraperitoneal leak and 10 with localized leak) had an abdominal drain. Drain output was significantly higher in patients with free intraperitoneal leak compared with patients with localized leak (370 vs 78 mL/d per patient, P < 0.01). All patients with free intraperitoneal bile leak underwent interventional procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stenting or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy later on. Patients with localized bile leak were managed conservatively and were free of symptoms at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that, in addition to detecting biliary leak, HBS may be used to identify patients with localized bile leak (48% of patients in our study) who do not require active intervention.
Collapse
|
13
|
Crismale JF, Ahmad J. Endoscopic Management of Biliary Issues in the Liver Transplant Patient. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2019; 29:237-256. [PMID: 30846151 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Biliary complications remain a common problem after liver transplantation (LT). The therapeutic endoscopist encounters a variety of situations in LT including strictures at the duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, strictures elsewhere in the biliary tree caused by an ischemic injury, and bile leaks at the anastomosis or from the cut surface and stone disease. Biliary complications lead to significant morbidity and occasionally reduced graft and patient survival. Several factors increase the risk of strictures and leaks. Endoscopic intervention in experienced hands is successful in the management of biliary complications following LT and percutaneous or surgical correction should seldom be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Crismale
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jawad Ahmad
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rainio M, Lindström O, Udd M, Haapamäki C, Nordin A, Kylänpää L. Endoscopic Therapy of Biliary Injury After Cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:474-480. [PMID: 28948425 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4768-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) is a common complication after cholecystectomy. Patients are mainly treated endoscopically, but the optimal treatment method has remained unclear. AIMS The aim was to analyze endoscopic treatment in BDI after cholecystectomy and to explore endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), with or without stenting, as the primary treatment for an Amsterdam type A bile leak. METHODS All patients referred to Helsinki University Hospital endoscopy unit due to a suspected BDI between the years 2004 and 2014 were included in this retrospective study. To collect the data, all ERC reports were reviewed. RESULTS Of the 99 BDI patients, 94 (95%) had bile leak of whom 11 had concomitant stricture. Ninety-three percent of all patients were treated endoscopically. Seventy-one patients had native papillae and a leak in the cystic duct or peripheral radicals. They were treated with ES (ES group, n = 50) or with sphincterotomy and stenting (EST group, n = 21). There was no difference between the closure time of the fistula (p = 0.179), in the time of discharge from hospital (p = 0.298), or in the primary healing rate between the ES group and the EST group (45/50 vs 19/21 patients, p = 0.951). CONCLUSION After the right patient selection, the success rate of endoscopic treatment can approach 100% for Amsterdam type A bile leak. ES is an effective and cost-effective single procedure with success rate similar to EST. It may be considered as a first-line therapy for the management of Amsterdam type A leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Rainio
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Outi Lindström
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marianne Udd
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carola Haapamäki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena Kylänpää
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Adler DG, Papachristou GI, Taylor LJ, McVay T, Birch M, Francis G, Zabolotsky A, Laique SN, Hayat U, Zhan T, Das R, Slivka A, Rabinovitz M, Munigala S, Siddiqui AA. Clinical outcomes in patients with bile leaks treated via ERCP with regard to the timing of ERCP: a large multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:766-772. [PMID: 27569859 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Postsurgical or traumatic bile duct leaks (BDLs) can be safely and effectively managed by endoscopic therapy via ERCP. The early diagnosis of BDL is important because unrecognized leaks can lead to serious adverse events (AEs). Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between timing of endotherapy after BDL and the clinical outcomes, AEs, and long-term results of endoscopic therapy. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study on patients with BDLs who underwent ERCP between 2006 and 2014. Data were assembled on patient demographics, etiology of BDL, and procedural details. Endotherapy for BDLs were classified a priori into 3 groups based on timing of ERCP from time of biliary injury: within 1 day of BDL, on day 2 or 3 after BDL, and greater than 3 days after BDL. The relationship among timing of ERCP after BDL injury and outcomes, procedure-related AEs, and patient AEs and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS From February 2006 to June 2014, 518 patients (50% male; mean age, 51.7 years) underwent ERCP for therapy of BDLs. The etiology of the BDL was laparoscopic cholecystectomy (70.7%), post-liver transplantation (11.2%), liver resection (14.1%), trauma (2.5%), and other causes (1.5%). Endotherapy was performed by placing a transpapillary stent alone (73.5%) or with a sphincterotomy (26.5%). The timing of ERCPs was as follows: ≤1 day = 57 patients, day 2 or 3 = 140 patients, and >3 days = 321 patients. There was no statistical difference in patient demographics, etiology/site of BDL, or type of endotherapy performed among the 3 groups. On multivariate analysis there was no statistically significant difference in BDL success rate for ERCPs performed within 1 day compared with those performed on day 2 or 3 or after 3 days of bile duct injury (91.2%, 90%, and 88.5%, respectively; P = .77). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the overall patient AE rate among the 3 groups (21.1%, 22.9%, and 24.6%, respectively; P = .81). AEs in men occurred significantly more frequently when compared with women, even after adjusting for age, BDL etiology, and location of leak (27.6% vs 19.9%; OR, 1.53; P = .04). Patients whose BDL was due to a cholecystectomy had a lower AE and mortality rate compared with those who had biliary injury from other etiologies (OR, .42; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The overall success rates and AEs after ERCP were not dependent on the timing of the procedure relative to the discovery of the bile leak. This suggests that ERCP in these patients can usually be performed in an elective, rather than an urgent, manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas G Adler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Georgios I Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Linda Jo Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tyler McVay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Madeleine Birch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Gloria Francis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew Zabolotsky
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sobia N Laique
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Umar Hayat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tingting Zhan
- Division of Biostatistics, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rohit Das
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mordechai Rabinovitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Satish Munigala
- Division of Biostatistics, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ali A Siddiqui
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kul M, Erden A, Düşünceli Atman E. Diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography in non-invasive detection of postoperative bile leakage. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160847. [PMID: 28181823 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic value of dynamic T1 weighted (T1w) gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR cholangiography (MRC) for the detection of active bile leaks. METHODS A total of 28 patients with suspected biliary leakage who underwent routine T2 weighted (T2w) MRC and T1w GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC at our institution from February 2013 to June 2016 were included in this study. The image sets were retrospectively analyzed in consensus by three radiologists. T1w Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC findings were correlated with clinical data, follow-up examinations and findings of invasive/surgical procedures. Patients with positive bile leak findings in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC were divided into hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (20-30 min) and delayed phase (DP) (60-390 min) group according to elapsed time between Gd-EOB-DTPA injection and initial bile leak findings in MRC images. These groups were compared in terms of laboratory test results (total bilirubin, liver enzymes) and the presence of bile duct dilatation in T2w MRC images. RESULTS In each patient, visualization of bile ducts was sufficient in the HBP. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1w MRC in the detection of biliary leaks were 92.9%, 90.5% and 100%, respectively (p < 0.001). 19 of 28 patients had bile leak findings in T1w Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC [HBP group: N = 7 (36.8%), DP group: N = 12 (63.2%)]. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of laboratory test results and the presence of bile duct dilatation between HBP and DP group (p > 0.05). Three patients, each of them in DP group, showed normal laboratory test results and bile duct diameters. CONCLUSION Dynamic T1w Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC is a useful non-invasive diagnostic tool to detect bile leak. Advances in knowledge: Prolonged DP imaging may be required for bile leak detection even if visualization of biliary tree is sufficient in HBP and liver function tests, total bilirubin levels and bile duct diameters are normal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melahat Kul
- Department of Radiology, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Erden
- Department of Radiology, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Düşünceli Atman
- Department of Radiology, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wilcox CM, Kim H, Ramesh J, Trevino J, Varadarajulu S. Biliary sphincterotomy is not required for bile duct stent placement. Dig Endosc 2014; 26:87-92. [PMID: 23517140 PMCID: PMC4159089 DOI: 10.1111/den.12058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 01/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to assess the success and outcome of bile duct stent placement without the use of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Over a period of 10 years and 9 months, all patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were prospectively identified. Bile duct stent placement was routinely done without EBS unless additional therapy (stone removal, multiple stenting) was anticipated. RESULTS Of 5020 patients who underwent ERCP, bile duct stents were placed in 1668 patients. After excluding those requiring additional endoscopic therapy, 1112 patients (89.5%) had ERCP and stent placement without a sphincterotomy and 130 patients (10.5%) had ERCP and stent placement with asphincterotomy. Deployed endoprostheses were self-expandable metallic stents in 15.7% and plastic in 77.5%. Caliber of plastic stents was 10 Fr in 78.9% and <10 Fr in 21.1%. All stents were successfully placed in these 1112 patients without the need for EBS. Comparing patients undergoing bile duct stenting with and without sphincterotomy, no difference was seen in rates of pancreatitis (1.54% vs 2.07%, P > 0.9999). CONCLUSION Single bile duct stents, both plastic and metal, can be deployed without EBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Mel Wilcox
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Basil I Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fu CY, Hsieh CH, Shih CH, Wang YC, Chen RJ, Huang HC, Huang JC, Wu SC, Lin C. The Effects of Repeat Laparoscopic Surgery on the Treatment of Complications Resulting from Laparoscopic Surgery. Am Surg 2012. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481207800929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery is frequently applied in the operative management of appendicitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis because it is a minimally invasive procedure. There are, however, some complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) that result in the need for reoperation. In the current study, we examine the effects of repeat laparoscopic surgery on the treatment of complications arising from LC/LA. From April 2005 to March 2011, we examined a cohort of patients who had received LC or LA and experienced complications that required reoperations. We focused on patients with postoperative hemorrhages, postoperative peritonitis, early postoperative small bowel obstructions (EPSBO), and biliary complications (after LC) who were treated through a repeat laparoscopic approach. The general demographics of the patients, their postoperative complications, procedures for selecting the appropriate reoperation method, and repeat laparoscopic findings are described in detail. During the 6-year period examined, 1608 patients received LC and 1486 patients received LA at the hospitals participating in this study. In patients with complications requiring reoperation, the repeat laparoscopic approach was performed successfully (without the need for further laparotomy) in 50 per cent of the patients with postoperative hemorrhage (2 of 4), 50 per cent of the patients with postoperative peritonitis (2 of 4), 75 per cent of the EPSBO patients (3 of 5), and 50 per cent the of patients with biliary complications (1 of 2). The repeat laparoscopic approach is an appropriate method for the management of complications arising from laparoscopic surgery. In patients with postoperative hemorrhage, laparoscopic hemostasis and hematoma evacuations can be performed while maintaining stable hemodynamics. In addition, laparoscopic approaches are also feasible for selective post-LC ductal injuries, EPSBO, and unconfirmed diagnoses of peritonitis after laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Yuan Fu
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Hsun Hsieh
- Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Han Shih
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Wang
- Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ray-Jade Chen
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Chang Huang
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Chien Huang
- Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chi Wu
- Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Catherine Lin
- Department of Medical Education and Research, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sharma H, Bird G. Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks. Frontline Gastroenterol 2011; 2:230-233. [PMID: 28839615 PMCID: PMC5517231 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the nature of bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy and the success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in their identification and management. DESIGN All patients referred for ERCP with a diagnosis of a postcholecystectomy bile leak were identified prospectively from October 1994 to August 2008. SETTING The study was carried out in a district general hospital with the endoscopies performed by a single operator. PATIENTS All patients had undergone imaging with at least two of abdominal ultrasound scanning, CT scanning or MR cholangiopancreatography. INTERVENTIONS ERCP with treatment of a biliary leak by sphincterotomy and insertion of a temporary 7 Fr plastic biliary stent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Clinical healing of the injury was assessed as resolution of symptoms with normalisation of liver function tests, cessation of external drain output and a repeat ERCP with removal of the indwelling stent within 2-8 weeks and no further complications. RESULTS 46 patients were identified, of whom 42 responded well to endoscopic treatment. Four patients ultimately needed surgery, of whom three had recurrent strictures. One patient had complete transection of the biliary duct and endoscopic treatment was not attempted. CONCLUSION ERCP, with sphincterotomy and temporary plastic stent placement, is successful in the early management of patients with postcholecystectomy biliary leaks, which most commonly involve the cystic duct stump. ERCP carried out in a district general hospital identifies those patients requiring further specialised hepatobiliary care in a tertiary centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemant Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| | - George Bird
- Department of Medicine, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ding GQ, Qin MF, Wang Q, Gou CY, Li N. Duodenoscopic diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2011; 19:305-308. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v19.i3.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the value of duodenoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: The clinical data for 32 patients who had bile leakage after LC and were treated at Tianjin Nankai Hospital from June 2004 to January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: All 32 patients received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the nature of bile leakage in all of them was elucidated. Of all patients, 20 had cystic duct stump leakage, 7 had common bile duct leakage, 3 had hepatic duct leakage, 2 had aberrant bile duct leakage; 28 were cured by endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), and 4 by plastic biliary stent implantation.The overall cure rate was 100%. The length of hospitalization stay ranged from 1 to 6 wk, with an average length of 24 d. No recurrence occurred in all patients during 3 to 72 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Duodenoscopy is a feasible and effective approach for the diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage after LC.
Collapse
|