1
|
Rapolti DI, Monrabal Lezama M, Manueli Laos EG, Schlottmann F, Masrur MA. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Effectiveness of Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Therapies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:581-602. [PMID: 38568115 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric operation in the United States. One of the main disadvantages of this procedure is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the operation. We aimed to analyze different approaches for the treatment of GERD after SG. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all possible treatment options for post-SG GERD. All the studies were assessed for full eligibility by manual assessment of their aims, methodology, results, and conclusions. Records were individually reviewed by the authors comparing outcomes and complications between procedures. Results: Although some studies have shown improvement or even resolution of GERD symptoms after SG, most patients develop or worsen symptoms. Lifestyle modifications along with medical therapy should be started on patients with GERD after SG. For those who are refractory to medication, endoscopic and surgical therapies can be offered. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is consistently effective in treatment of GERD and is the ideal therapy in patients with associated insufficient weight loss. Endoscopic and alternative surgical procedures are also available and have shown acceptable short-term outcomes. Conclusions: Several treatment options exist for the treatment of GERD after SG. Although conversion to RYGB remains the most effective therapy, other emerging endoscopic and surgical procedures could avoid the potential morbidity of this procedure and should be further evaluated. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of GERD after SG is proposed to guide decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana I Rapolti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans LA, Castillo-Larios R, Cornejo J, Elli EF. Challenges of Revisional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide to Unraveling the Complexities and Solutions of Revisional Bariatric Procedures. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3104. [PMID: 38892813 PMCID: PMC11172990 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Revisional metabolic and bariatric surgery (RMBS) presents unique challenges in addressing weight loss failure or complications arising from initial bariatric procedures. This review aims to explore the complexities and solutions associated with revisional bariatric procedures comprehensively, offering insights into the evolving terrain of metabolic and bariatric surgery. A literature review is conducted to identify pertinent studies and expert opinions regarding RMBS. Methodological approaches, patient selection criteria, surgical techniques, preoperative assessments, and postoperative management strategies are synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of current practices and advancements in the field, including institutional protocols. This review synthesizes key findings regarding the challenges encountered in RMBS, including the underlying causes of primary procedure failure, anatomical complexities, technical considerations, and assessments of surgical outcomes. Additionally, patient outcomes, complication rates, and long-term success are presented, along with institutional approaches to patient assessment and procedure selection. This review provides valuable insights for clinicians grappling with the complexities of RMBS. A comprehensive understanding of patient selection, surgical techniques, preoperative management, and postoperative care is crucial for enhancing outcomes and ensuring patient satisfaction in the field of metabolic bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Enrique F. Elli
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nehra D, Clements CDM, Bezzaa SL, Tabbakh Y, Walsh CM. Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:344-352. [PMID: 37609688 PMCID: PMC10981991 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a chronic progressive disease, associated with substantial clinical and economic burden. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are considered first-line treatment; however, there are concerns around the long-term impact of their usage. Surgical treatment with Nissen fundoplication can be considered but, because of the potential side effects, few patients undergo surgery and there remains a substantial therapeutic gap within the current treatment pathway. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) using the LINX® device is an alternative surgical approach. METHODS The objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic MSA surgery using the LINX® device in a UK setting. A retrospective questionnaire obtained data regarding postoperative symptoms, medication use and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Out of 131 patients surveyed, 97 responses were received, with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year. In those who reported heartburn and regurgitation preoperatively, improvement was reported in 93% (84/90) and 90% (86/96) of patients, respectively. Eighty-eight per cent (73/83) of patients were able to completely stop or reduce their medication by at least 75%. Seventy-seven per cent (73/95) of patients were "very satisfied" or "satisfied". CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to present patient-reported outcomes of MSA using the LINX® device for patients with GORD in the UK. It demonstrates that the device has favourable outcomes and could effectively bridge the current therapeutic gap that exists between PPI medication and Nissen fundoplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Nehra
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - CDM Clements
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - SL Bezzaa
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valinoti AC, Angeramo CA, Dreifuss N, Herbella FAM, Schlottmann F. MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2024; 36:e1781. [PMID: 38451590 PMCID: PMC10911679 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020230063e1781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic ring (MSA) implantation in the esophagus is an alternative surgical procedure to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. AIMS The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS A systematic literature review of articles on MSA was performed using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) database between 2008 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A random-effect model was used to generate a pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) across all studies. RESULTS A total of 22 studies comprising 4,663 patients with MSA were analysed. Mean follow-up was 27.3 (7-108) months. The weighted pooled proportion of symptom improvement and patient satisfaction were 93% (95%CI 83-98%) and 85% (95%CI 78-90%), respectively. The mean DeMeester score (pre-MSA: 34.6 vs. post-MSA: 8.9, p=0.03) and GERD-HRQL score (pre-MSA: 25.8 vs. post-MSA: 4.4, p<0.0001) improved significantly after MSA. The proportion of patients taking proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) decreased from 92.8 to 12.4% (p<0.0001). The weighted pooled proportions of dysphagia, endoscopic dilatation and gas-related symptoms were 18, 13, and 3%, respectively. Esophageal erosion occurred in 1% of patients, but its risk significantly increased for every year of MSA use (odds ratio - OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.11-1.77, p=0.004). Device removal was needed in 4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Although MSA is a very effective treatment modality for GERD, postoperative dysphagia is common and the risk of esophageal erosion increases over time. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term safety of MSA placement in patients with GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustin Cesar Valinoti
- Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Esophagus and Stomach Surgical Unit – Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Nicolas Dreifuss
- Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Esophagus and Stomach Surgical Unit – Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Esophagus and Stomach Surgical Unit – Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Froiio C, Aiolfi A, Bona D, Bonavina L. Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Front Surg 2023; 10:1293270. [PMID: 38026489 PMCID: PMC10661944 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated. Methods Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed. Results Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 ± 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000]. Conclusion Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Froiio
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Aiolfi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Bona
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith W, Davila N. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: 2021 guideline updates and clinical pearls. Nurse Pract 2023; 48:24-25. [PMID: 37368553 DOI: 10.1097/01.npr.0000000000000065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT In 2021, the American College of Gastroenterology updated its diagnosis and treatment guideline for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This article provides a summary of noteworthy changes to the guideline and describes clinical pearls that are pertinent to the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in primary care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Reiter AJ, Farina DA, Fronza JS, Komanduri S. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: considerations for use in Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac096. [PMID: 36575922 PMCID: PMC10267686 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) occurs in 5-15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While acid suppressive therapy is a critical component of BE management to minimize the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, surgical control of mechanical reflux is sometimes necessary. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an increasingly utilized anti-reflux surgical therapy for GERD. While the use of MSA is listed as a precaution by the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are limited data showing effective BE regression with MSA. MSA offers several advantages in BE including effective reflux control, anti-reflux barrier restoration and reduced hiatal hernia recurrence. However, careful patient selection for MSA is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audra J Reiter
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Domenico A Farina
- Department of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Fronza
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee WG, Evans LL, Johnson SM, Woo RK. The Evolving Use of Magnets in Surgery: Biomedical Considerations and a Review of Their Current Applications. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:bioengineering10040442. [PMID: 37106629 PMCID: PMC10136001 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10040442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel use of magnetic force to optimize modern surgical techniques originated in the 1970s. Since then, magnets have been utilized as an adjunct or alternative to a wide array of existing surgical procedures, ranging from gastrointestinal to vascular surgery. As the use of magnets in surgery continues to grow, the body of knowledge on magnetic surgical devices from preclinical development to clinical implementation has expanded significantly; however, the current magnetic surgical devices can be organized based on their core function: serving as a guidance system, creating a new connection, recreating a physiologic function, or utilization of an internal–external paired magnet system. The purpose of this article is to discuss the biomedical considerations during magnetic device development and review the current surgical applications of magnetic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G. Lee
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Lauren L. Evans
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Sidney M. Johnson
- Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
| | - Russell K. Woo
- Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Toniolo I, Mascolini MV, Carniel EL, Fontanella CG. Artificial sphincters: An overview from existing devices to novel technologies. Artif Organs 2023; 47:617-639. [PMID: 36374175 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Artificial sphincters (ASs) are used to replace the function of the biological sphincters in case of severe urinary and fecal incontinence (UI and FI), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The design of ASs is established on different mechanisms, e.g., magnetic forces or hydraulic pressure, with the final goal to achieve a implantable and durable AS. In clinical practice, the implantation of in-commerce AS is considered a reasonable solution, despite the sub-optimal clinical outcomes. The failure of these surgeries is due to the malfunction of the devices (between 46 and 51%) or the side effects on the biological tissues (more than 38%), such as infection and atrophy. Concentrating on this latter characteristic, particular attention has been given to the interaction between the biological tissues and AS, pointing out the closing mechanism around the duct and the effect on the tissues. To analyze this aspect, an overview of existing commercial/ready-on-market ASs for GERD, UI, and FI, together with the clinical outcomes available from the in-commerce AS, is given. Moreover, this invited review discusses ongoing developments and future research pathways for creating novel ASs. The application of engineering principles and design concepts to medicine enhances the quality of healthcare and improves patient outcomes. In this context, computational methods represent an innovative solution in the design of ASs, proving data on the occlusive force and pressure necessary to guarantee occlusion and avoid tissue damage, considering the coupling between different device sizes and individual variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Toniolo
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Mascolini
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Emanuele Luigi Carniel
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Giulia Fontanella
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patel A, Gyawali CP. The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective. Dis Esophagus 2023:7034219. [PMID: 36776100 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical intervention for well-characterized gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), where the esophagogastric junction barrier is augmented using a bracelet of magnetized titanium beads. MSA could be an attractive option for patients with documented GERD who wish to avoid long-term pharmacologic therapy or whose symptoms are not adequately managed with lifestyle modifications and pharmacologic therapy. The 'ideal' MSA patient is one with prominent regurgitation, without dysphagia or esophageal motor dysfunction, with objective evidence of GERD on upper endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring. Appropriate candidates with significant hiatus hernia may pursue MSA with concomitant hiatus hernia repair. The increasing adoption of MSA in the GERD treatment pathway reflects research that shows benefits in long-term outcomes and healthcare costs compared with other established therapies in appropriate clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine and the Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Froiio C, Tareq A, Riggio V, Siboni S, Bonavina L. Real-world evidence with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a scoping review. Eur Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-022-00789-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Summary
Background
The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high, with up to 30% of the Western population reporting reflux-related symptoms with or without hiatal hernia. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a standardized laparoscopic procedure for patients who are dissatisfied with medical therapy and for those with early-stage disease who would not usually be considered ideal candidates for fundoplication. The MSA device is manufactured in different sizes and is designed to augment the physiologic barrier to reflux by magnetic force.
Methods
An extensive scoping review was performed to provide a map of current evidence with respect to MSA, to identify gaps in knowledge, and to make recommendations for future research. All the authors contributed to the literature search in PubMed and Web of Science and contributed to summarizing the evidence.
Results
Magnetic sphincter augmentation, especially in combination with crural repair, is effective in reducing GERD symptoms, proton pump inhibitor use, and esophageal acid exposure, and in improving patients’ quality of life. Safety issues such as device erosion or migration have been rare and not associated with mortality. The MSA device can be removed laparoscopically if necessary, thereby preserving the option of fundoplication or other therapies in the future. Contraindication to scanning in high-power Tesla magnetic resonance systems remains a potential limitation of the MSA procedure. High-resolution manometry and functional lumen imaging probes appear to be promising tools to predict procedural outcomes by improving reflux control and reducing the incidence of dysphagia.
Conclusion
A consensus on acquisition and interpretation of high-resolution manometry and impedance planimetry data is needed to gain better understanding of physiology, to improve patient selection, and to pave the way for a personalized surgical approach in antireflux surgery.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sarici IS, Dunn CP, Eriksson SE, Jobe BA, Ayazi S. Long-term clinical and functional results of magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus 2022:6965898. [PMID: 36585776 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) was introduced in 2007 as an alternative surgical procedure for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The majority of data since MSA's introduction has focused on short and intermediate-term results, demonstrating safety and high efficacy in terms of reflux symptom control, freedom from proton pump inhibitor use and normalization of distal esophageal acid exposure. However, GERD is a chronic condition that demands a long-term solution. Limited available data from studies reporting outcomes at 5 years or later following MSA demonstrate that the promising short- and mid-term efficacy and safety profile of MSA remains relatively constant in the long term. Compared with Nissen fundoplication, MSA has a much lower rate of gas-bloat and inability to belch at a short-term follow-up, a difference that persists in the long-term. The most common complaint after MSA at a short-term follow-up is dysphagia. However, limited data suggest dysphagia rates largely decrease by 5 years. Dysphagia is the most common indication for dilation and device removal in both early- and long-term studies. However, the overall rates of dilation and removal are similar in short- and long-term reports, suggesting the majority of these procedures are performed in the short-term period after device implantation. The indications and standard practices of MSA have evolved over time. Long-term outcome data currently available are all from patient cohorts who were selected for MSA under early restricted indications and outdated regimens. Therefore, further long-term studies are needed to corroborate the preliminary, yet encouraging long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inanc S Sarici
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Colin P Dunn
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sven E Eriksson
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahin Ayazi
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Veletić M, Apu EH, Simić M, Bergsland J, Balasingham I, Contag CH, Ashammakhi N. Implants with Sensing Capabilities. Chem Rev 2022; 122:16329-16363. [PMID: 35981266 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Because of the aging human population and increased numbers of surgical procedures being performed, there is a growing number of biomedical devices being implanted each year. Although the benefits of implants are significant, there are risks to having foreign materials in the body that may lead to complications that may remain undetectable until a time at which the damage done becomes irreversible. To address this challenge, advances in implantable sensors may enable early detection of even minor changes in the implants or the surrounding tissues and provide early cues for intervention. Therefore, integrating sensors with implants will enable real-time monitoring and lead to improvements in implant function. Sensor integration has been mostly applied to cardiovascular, neural, and orthopedic implants, and advances in combined implant-sensor devices have been significant, yet there are needs still to be addressed. Sensor-integrating implants are still in their infancy; however, some have already made it to the clinic. With an interdisciplinary approach, these sensor-integrating devices will become more efficient, providing clear paths to clinical translation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladen Veletić
- Department of Electronic Systems, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Technology and Innovation Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ehsanul Hoque Apu
- Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering (IQ) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
| | - Mitar Simić
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Jacob Bergsland
- The Intervention Centre, Technology and Innovation Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ilangko Balasingham
- Department of Electronic Systems, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Technology and Innovation Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Christopher H Contag
- Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering (IQ) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States
| | - Nureddin Ashammakhi
- Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering (IQ) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nikolic M, Matic A, Feka J, Gensthaler L, Kristo I, Osmokrovic B, Riegler FM, Mosleh BO, Schoppmann SF. Expanded Indication for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation: Outcomes in Weakly Acidic Reflux Compared to Standard GERD Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:532-541. [PMID: 34590216 PMCID: PMC8926968 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a modern surgical anti-reflux technique with proven efficacy and low postoperative morbidity in patients with acidic reflux. The aim of this retrospective review study was to evaluate the symptomatic outcome of MSA in patients with weakly acidic reflux. METHODS From a prospectively collected clinical database, comprising all 327 patients that underwent MSA at our institution, a total of 67 patients with preoperative weakly acidic reflux measured in the 24-h impedance-pH-metry were identified. Postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor intake (PPI), GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL), alimentary satisfaction (AS), and patients' overall satisfaction were evaluated within highly standardized follow-up appointments. Furthermore, outcome of these patients was compared to the postoperative outcome of a comparable group of patients with a preoperative acidic reflux. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 24 months, none of the patients with weakly acidic reflux presented with persistent dysphagia, or underwent endoscopic dilatation or reoperation. The postoperative GERD-HRQL score was significantly reduced (2 vs. 20; p = 0.001) and the median AS was 9/10. Preoperative daily heartburn, regurgitations, and respiratory complaints were improved in 95%, 95%, and 96% of patients, respectively. A total of 10% of the patients continued to use PPIs postoperatively. No significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative outcome or quality of life when comparing weakly acidic reflux patients with those diagnosed with preoperative acidic reflux. CONCLUSION Magnetic sphincter augmentation significantly improves GERD-related symptoms and quality of life in patients with weakly acidic reflux with very low postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Nikolic
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksa Matic
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joy Feka
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisa Gensthaler
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivan Kristo
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bogdan Osmokrovic
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Krankenhaus Oberwart, Dornburggasse 80, 7400, Oberwart, Austria
| | - Franz M Riegler
- Reflux Ordination, Mariannengasse 10/4/9, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Berta O Mosleh
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sebastian F Schoppmann
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bortolotti M. Magnetic challenge against gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:8227-8241. [PMID: 35068867 PMCID: PMC8717015 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i48.8227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Almost 15 years have passed since the first paper on the possibility of using magnets to prevent gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) was published and so it is time to assess the results obtained with the first magnetic device available on the market, the Linx magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and to consider what other options are forthcoming. MSA demonstrated an anti-reflux activity similar to that of Nissen fundoplication, considered the “gold standard” surgical treatment for GER disease, and caused less gas-bloating and a better ability to allow vomiting and belching. However, unlike Nissen fundoplication, this magnetic device is burdened by complications, which are roughly similar to those of the non-magnetic anti-reflux Angelchik prosthesis, that, after considerable use in the eighties, was shelved due to these complications. It is interesting to note that some of these complications show the same pathophysiological mechanism in both devices. The upcoming new magnetic devices should avoid these complications, as their anti-reflux magnetic mechanism is completely different. The experiments in animals regarding these new magnetic appliances were examined, remarking their advantages and drawbacks, but the way to apply them in surgical practice is long and difficult, although worthy, as they represent the future of magnetic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Bortolotti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
- Via Massarenti 48, Bologna 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhuang QJ, Tan ND, Chen SF, Zhang MY, Xiao YL. Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:695-705. [PMID: 34693633 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). METHODS Literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, OpenGrey and ClincalTrials.gov for single-arm studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of MSA in rGERD or comparative studies with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) serving as the control published until April 2020. Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative PPI use, and secondary outcomes included postoperative GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), normalization of acid exposure time (AET) and incidence of procedure-related adverse events (AE). RESULTS Ten single-arm studies, one randomized controlled trial and three cohort studies involving 1138 participants were included. Post-MSA PPI withdrawal, significant GERD-HRQL improvement and AET normalization were achieved in 87.0%, 88.0% and 75.0% of the patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was 29% and endoscopic dilation was required in 7.4% of patients undergoing MSA. MSA showed a better efficacy in symptom control than PPI (PPI cessation: 91% vs 0%; GERD-HRQL improvement: 81% vs 8%) and similar effectiveness but a lower risk of gas-bloat syndrome (risk ratio [RR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.93, P = 0.01) and better reserved ability to belch (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.76-2.86, P = 0.25) compared with LNF. CONCLUSIONS MSA was an effective and safe therapy for rGERD. Well-designed randomized trials that compare the efficacy of MSA with other therapies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Jun Zhuang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Nian Di Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Song Feng Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meng Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying Lian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ferrari D, Siboni S, Riva CG, Guerrazzi G, Lovece A, Bonavina L. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:645592. [PMID: 34796181 PMCID: PMC8592890 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.645592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are variable depending on surgical expertise and/or patient-related factors. Some procedures may be inadequate in patients with severe disease. Effectiveness of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been extensively tested in patients with severe disease. Methods: A prospectively collected database was analyzed to identify patients who underwent MSA at a single institution. Individuals who had previous esophago-gastric surgery were excluded. Severe GERD was defined as lower esophageal sphincter pressure <5 mmHg, distal esophageal amplitude <30 mmHg, Barrett's metaplasia, stricture or grade C-D esophagitis, and/or DeMeester score >50. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe GERD were compared with those of patients with mild to moderate GERD who served as control group. Results: Over the study period, a total of 336 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 102 (30.4%) had severe GERD. The median follow-up was 24 months (IQR = 75) in severe GERD patients and 32 months (IQR = 84) in those with non-severe GERD. Patients with severe GERD had a higher rate of dysphagia and higher GERD-HRQL scores. After the MSA procedure, symptoms, health-related quality of life scores, and proton-pump inhibitors consumption significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). No difference between groups was found in the prevalence of severe post-operative dysphagia, the need for endoscopic dilation or device removal, and the DeMeester score. Conclusion: Laparoscopic MSA is safe and effective in reducing symptoms, PPI use, and esophageal acid exposure also in patients with severe GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Ferrari
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Siboni
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Galdino Riva
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Guerrazzi
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lovece
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
James TJ, Burke JF, Putnam LR, Pan J, Bildzukewicz NA, Bell R, Lipham JC. Loosening the belt on magnetic sphincter augmentation indications: does body mass index matter? Surg Endosc 2021; 36:4878-4884. [PMID: 34750701 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08839-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the impact of obesity on MSA outcomes is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MSA in patients with GERD and obesity. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic MSA at three high-volume centers from 2016 to 2019. Patients were grouped into four cohorts according to the World Health Organization body mass index (BMI) classification: BMI < 25 (normal weight), BMI 25-29.9 (overweight), BMI 30-34.9 (obese class I), and BMI > 35 (obese class II-III). Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 621 patients underwent laparoscopic MSA during the study period. Follow-up with endoscopy or video esophagram was available for 361 patients (58%) with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar except the BMI > 35 group had more females and a higher preoperative median DeMeester score. There were no significant differences in outcomes between normal weight, overweight, and obese patient groups undergoing MSA. All groups experienced significant reductions in acid suppressive medication use, low GERD-HRQL scores, low DeMeester scores, few intraoperative and postoperative complications, and low rates of hiatal hernia recurrence after MSA. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic sphincter augmentation is safe and effective in improving GERD symptoms, reducing esophageal acid exposure, and preventing hiatal hernia recurrence, irrespective of patient BMI. MSA should be considered an acceptable treatment option for obese patients with GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayler J James
- Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Jocelyn F Burke
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, CO, USA
| | - Luke R Putnam
- Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Jennifer Pan
- Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Nikolai A Bildzukewicz
- Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Reginald Bell
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, CO, USA
| | - John C Lipham
- Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mahmoud T, Jaruvongvanich V, Ghazi R, Abusaleh R, Abu Dayyeh BK. Complete endoscopic removal of an eroded magnetic sphincter augmentation device. VideoGIE 2021; 6:450-453. [PMID: 34660945 PMCID: PMC8503934 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tala Mahmoud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Rabih Ghazi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rami Abusaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2545-2551. [PMID: 34462810 PMCID: PMC8578182 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Knowledge of MSA-related complications, indications for removal, and techniques are puzzled. With this study, we aimed to evaluate indications, techniques for removal, surgical approach, and outcomes with MSA removal. Methods This is an observational singe-center study. Patients were followed up regularly with endoscopy, pH monitoring, and assessed for specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and generic short-form 36 (SF-36) quality of life. Results Five patients underwent MSA explant. Four patients were males and the median age was 47 years (range 44–55). Heartburn, epigastric/chest pain, and dysphagia were commonly reported. The median implant duration was 46 months (range 31–72). A laparoscopic approach was adopted in all patients. Intraoperative findings included normal anatomy (40%), herniation in the mediastinum (40%), and erosion (20%). The most common anti-reflux procedures were Dor (n = 2), Toupet (n = 2), and anterior partial fundoplication (n = 1). The median operative time was 145 min (range 60–185), and the median hospital length of stay was 4 days (range 3–6). The median postoperative follow-up was 41 months (range 12–51). At the last follow-up, 80% of patients were off PPI; the GERD-HRQL and SF-36 questionnaire were improved with DeMeester score and esophageal acid exposure normalization. Conclusion The MSA device can be safely explanted through a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. Tailoring a fundoplication, according to preoperative patient symptoms and intraoperative findings, seems feasible and safe with a promising trend toward improved symptoms and quality of life. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bonavina L, Boyle N, Schoppmann SF. The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37:384-389. [PMID: 33883422 PMCID: PMC9904435 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been designed as a less disruptive and more standardized laparoscopic surgical procedure than fundoplication for patients with early stage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We analyzed the more recent literature in search of updates regarding indications, technique, perioperative management, and long-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Over the years, the procedure of MSA has evolved to including full hiatus repair rather than relying on the preservation of the phreno-esophageal ligament. Restoring the mechanical synergy between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm has the potential to further enhance the antireflux barrier. The adoption of this approach has led to expand the indications from early stage disease to different scenarios including patients with high esophageal acid exposure, atypical symptoms, large hiatal hernias, Barrett's esophagus, postbariatric surgery, and previously failed fundoplication. SUMMARY MSA has a favorable side-effect profile and is highly effective in reducing typical reflux symptoms, medication dependency, and esophageal acid exposure. Excellent outcomes have been confirmed over a 12-year follow-up, indicating that the operation has the potential to prevent GERD progression. Further studies are needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of this procedure in patients with more advanced disease-stage and prior gastric surgery. A randomized control trial comparing MSA with fundoplication could raise the level of evidence and the strength of recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Bonavina
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Nick Boyle
- King Edward VII Hospital, Medical Director RefluxUK, London, UK
| | - Sebastian F. Schoppmann
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of General Surgery, Upper-GI-Service, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
DeMarchi J, Schwiers M, Soberman M, Tokarski A. Evolution of a novel technology for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a safety perspective of magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6295819. [PMID: 34117494 PMCID: PMC8597906 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation using the LINX® device is a minimally invasive surgical option for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. An estimated 30,000 devices have been implanted worldwide. Device removals and erosion are identified risks. The objective of this analysis is to explore the procedure evolution with an emphasis on the removals and associated characteristics that may guide future clinical practice. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience and Ethicon's complaint databases were queried for all surgical device explants since January 2013. Device unit sales were used to determine the rates. The endpoint was based upon the time from implant to explant. Explant and erosion rates were calculated at yearly intervals and the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to measure the time to explant. Chi-square analyses were used to investigate the risk of explant associated with the size, geography and implant year. Overall, 7-year cumulative risk of removal was 4.81% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) CI: 4.31-5.36%). The likelihood of removal was significantly related to the device size (P < 0.0001), with smaller sizes being more likely to be explanted. The primary reasons for device removal and relative percentages were dysphagia/odynophagia (47.9%), persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (20.5%) and unknown/other (11.2%). Overall, the 7-year cumulative risk of erosion was 0.28% (95% CI: 0.17-0.46%). The average device size increased from 14.2 beads ± 1.0 in 2013 to 15.3 beads ± 1.2 in 2019 (P < 0.001). Surgical technique and perioperative management play an important role in the outcomes. Clinical practice changes since magnetic sphincter augmentation has been incorporated into clinical use are associated with improved outcomes and should be further characterized. Smaller device size is associated with increased removal and erosion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Soberman
- Medical Safety, Ethicon Incorporated, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wahi JE, Le C, Yousef M, Hernandez E, Stickles MG, Ben-David K. Robotic LINX Placement: Is it Worth It? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:526-529. [PMID: 33784476 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is considered the current gold standard of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX® device was developed as a less technically challenging alternative that has proven to be a safe and effective surgical antireflux procedure. Despite rapid adoption of the robotic platform in many areas of general surgery, no studies have compared laparoscopic and robotic approaches to placement of the LINX device. This retrospective study is the first to compare the robotic platform with the laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive LINX placement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a total cohort of 20 patients who underwent LINX placement with hiatal hernia repair at our institution. Half of the patients underwent surgery using laparoscopy and the other half with robotic technology. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and charge differences were analyzed. Results: We found that there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, surgical outcomes, use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) postoperatively, or postoperative dysphagia. Patients undergoing robotic surgery had longer operative time (139 ± 25 minutes versus 81 ± 14 minutes, P < .01), higher intraoperative charges ($8980 ± 275 versus $7239 ± 355, P < .01), and higher charges associated with their hospital stay ($45,037 ± 4112.41 versus $39,565 ± 3731.64, P < .01). Conclusions: In comparison with laparoscopic LINX procedures, robotic LINX does not offer superior surgical outcomes in terms of postoperative PPI use, dysphagia, or hospital length of stay. Robotic LINX procedures are associated with increased operative time and overall charges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Emilia Wahi
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC), Miami Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher Le
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC), Miami Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Yousef
- Finance and Resource Management, MSMC, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Kfir Ben-David
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC), Miami Beach, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation: Poor Consensus Among Experts Regarding Key Technical Aspects of Implantation. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:36-39. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
25
|
Huynh P, Konda V, Sanguansataya S, Ward MA, Leeds SG. Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 31:264-276. [PMID: 33347088 PMCID: PMC8154178 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with Barrett esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and significantly impacts quality of life. Medical management is the first line therapy with surgical fundoplication as an alternative therapy. However, a small portion of patients who fail medical therapy are referred for surgical consultation. This creates a "gap" in therapy for those patients dissatisfied with medical therapy but are not getting referred for surgical consultation. Three procedures have been designed to address these patients. These include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lower esophageal sphincter, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and magnetic sphincter augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Pubmed literature review was conducted of all publications for RFA, TIF, and MSA. Four most common endpoints for the 3 procedures were compared at different intervals of follow-up. These include percent of patients off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), GERD-HRQL score, DeMeester score, and percent of time with pH <4. A second query was performed for patients treated with PPI and fundoplications to match the same 4 endpoints as a control. RESULTS Variable freedom from PPI was reported at 1 year for RFA with a weighted mean of 62%, TIF with a weighted mean of 61%, MSA with a weighted mean of 85%, and fundoplications with a weighted mean of 84%. All procedures including PPIs improved quality-of-life scores but were not equal. Fundoplication had the best improvement followed by MSA, TIF, RFA, and PPI, respectively. DeMeester scores are variable after all procedures and PPIs. All MSA studies showed normalization of pH, whereas only 4 of 17 RFA studies and 3 of 11 TIF studies reported normalization of pH. CONCLUSIONS Our literature review compares 3 rival procedures to treat "gap" patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease with 4 common endpoints. Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to have the most reproducible and linear outcomes but is the most invasive of the 3 procedures. MSA outcomes most closely mirrors that of fundoplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Huynh
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
| | - Vani Konda
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Marc A. Ward
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX
| | - Steven G. Leeds
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Magnetic sphincter augmentation with hiatal hernia repair: long term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5607-5612. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
27
|
Vaezi MF, Shaheen NJ, Muthusamy VR. State of Evidence in Minimally Invasive Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux: Findings of a Scoping Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:1504-1525. [PMID: 32621903 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS & AIMS Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is being employed increasingly. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the volume of available evidence on the benefits of endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical therapies for GERD. METHODS criteria were used to perform an extensive literature search of data regarding the reported benefit of endoscopic therapies in GERD. Randomized controlled studies were utilized when available; however, data from observational studies were also reviewed. RESULTS A formal review of evidence was performed in 22 studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria and study duration were noted and tabulated. Assessment of outcomes was based on symptoms and objective criteria reported by investigators. Reported outcomes for the interventions were tabulated under the heading of subjective (symptom scores, quality of life metrics, and change in proton pump inhibitor use) and objective metrics (pH parameters, endoscopic signs, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure changes). Adverse events were noted and tabulated. The majority of studies showed symptomatic and objective improvement of GERD with the device therapies. Adverse events were minimal. However, normalization of acid exposure occurred in about 50% of patients and, for some modalities, long-term durability is uncertain. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review revealed that the endoluminal and minimally invasive surgical devices for GERD therapy are a promising alternative to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Their place in the treatment algorithm for GERD will be better defined when important clinical parameters, especially durability of effect, are better understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with prior bariatric and anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5322-5327. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08025-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
29
|
Spechler SJ. Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2020; 49:437-450. [PMID: 32718563 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite the exceptional efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in healing reflux esophagitis complicating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), up to 40% of patients who take PPIs for GERD complain of persistent GERD symptoms. There is no clear consensus on the type, dosing, and duration of PPI therapy required to establish a diagnosis of PPI-refractory GERD symptoms, but most authorities do not consider patients "PPI-refractory" unless they have been on double-dose PPIs. This article discusses the mechanisms that might underlie heartburn that does not respond PPIs and an approach to the management of patients with PPI-refractory GERD symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Jon Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, 3500 Gaston Avenue, 2 Hoblitzelle, Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ferrari D, Asti E, Lazzari V, Siboni S, Bernardi D, Bonavina L. Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13753. [PMID: 32792508 PMCID: PMC7426413 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70742-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has been proven safe and effective in controlling typical reflux symptoms and esophageal acid exposure for up to 6-year follow-up. Longer term outcomes have not been reported yet. A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to assess long-term safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic MSA procedure at a single referral center. Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), and esophageal acid exposure were compared to baseline. Favorable outcomes were defined as ≥ 50% improvement of GERD-HRQL total score and PPI discontinuation. Between March 2007 and March 2020, 335 patients met the study inclusion criteria, and 124 of them were followed from 6 to 12 years after surgery (median 9 years, IQR 2). Mean total GERD-HRQL score significantly improved from 19.9 to 4.01 (p < 0.001), and PPI were discontinued by 79% of patients. The mean total percent time with pH < 4 decreased from 9.6% at baseline to 4.1% (p < 0.001), with 89% of patients achieving pH normalization. Independent predictors of a favorable outcome were age at intervention < 40 years (OR 4.17) and GERD-HRQL score > 15 (OR 4.09). We confirm long-term safety and efficacy of MSA in terms of symptom improvement, decreased drug dependency, and reduced esophageal acid exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Ferrari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Asti
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza E. Malan, 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
| | - Veronica Lazzari
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza E. Malan, 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
| | - Stefano Siboni
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza E. Malan, 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
| | - Daniele Bernardi
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza E. Malan, 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza E. Malan, 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3449-3458. [PMID: 32676727 PMCID: PMC8195805 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07792-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical intervention for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which has been evaluated in numerous studies and has shown beneficial effects. Long-term effectiveness data for MSA as well as laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) in patients with GERD are needed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the 3-year outcomes for MSA and LF in patients with GERD. METHODS This prospective, multi-center, observational registry study evaluated MSA and LF in clinical practice over 3 years (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01624506). Data collection included baseline characteristics, reflux symptoms, medication use, satisfaction and complications. Post-surgical evaluations were collected at yearly intervals. RESULTS Between December 2009 and December 2014, 631 patients (465 MSA and 166 LF) were enrolled in the registry. Both MSA and LF resulted in improvements in total GERD-HRQL score (mean reduction in GERD-HRQL from baseline to 3 years post-surgery: MSA 22.0 to 4.6 and LF 23.6 to 4.9) and in satisfaction (GERD-HRQL satisfaction increase from baseline to 3 years: MSA 4.6% to 78.2% and LF 3.7% to 76.5%). Most patients were able to belch as needed with both therapies (MSA 97.6% and LF 91.7% at 3 years). MSA allowed a higher percentage of patients the ability to vomit as needed (MSA 91.2% and LF 68.0% at 3 years). PPI usage declined from baseline to 3 years for both groups after surgery (MSA 97.8% to 24.2% and LF 95.8% to 19.5%). The mean procedure time was shorter for MSA than for LF. Intraoperative and procedure-related complication rates (≤ 2%) were low for both therapies. CONCLUSIONS This 3-year prospective observational registry study contributes to the mounting evidence for the effectiveness of MSA and LF. Despite the more severe nature of GERD in the LF group, the clinical outcomes for MSA and LF were favorable from an effectiveness and safety standpoint.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bell R, Lipham J, Louie BE, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors for Regurgitation in a 1-Year Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1736-1743.e2. [PMID: 31518717 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Regurgitative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractive to medical treatment is common and caused by mechanical failure of the anti-reflux barrier. We compared the effects of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with those of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a randomized trial. METHODS Patients with moderate to severe regurgitation (assessed by the foregut symptom questionnaire) despite once-daily PPI therapy (n = 152) were randomly assigned to groups given twice-daily PPIs (n = 102) or laparoscopic MSA (n = 50) at 20 sites, from July 2015 through February 2017. Patients answered questions from the foregut-specific reflux disease questionnaire and GERD health-related quality of life survey about regurgitation, heartburn, dysphagia, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, and medication use, at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Six months after PPI therapy, MSA was offered to patients with persistent moderate to severe regurgitation and excess reflux episodes during impedance or pH testing on medication. Regurgitation, foregut scores, esophageal acid exposure, and adverse events were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS Patients in the MSA group and those who crossed over to the MSA group after PPI therapy (n = 75) had similar outcomes. MSA resulted in control of regurgitation in 72/75 patients (96%); regurgitation control was independent of preoperative response to PPIs. Only 8/43 patients receiving PPIs (19%) reported control of regurgitation. Among the 75 patients who received MSA, 61 (81%) had improvements in GERD health-related quality of life improvement scores (greater than 50%) and 68 patients (91%) discontinued daily PPI use. Proportions of patients with dysphagia decreased from 15% to 7% (P < .005), bloating decreased from 55% to 25%, and esophageal acid exposure time decreased from 10.7% to 1.3% (P < .001) from study entry to 1-year after MSA (Combined P < .001). Seventy percent (48/69) of patients had pH normalization at study completion. MSA was not associated with any peri-operative events, device explants, erosions, or migrations. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study, we found MSA to reduce regurgitation in 95% of patients with moderate to severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. MSA is superior to twice-daily PPIs therapy in reducing regurgitation. Relief of regurgitation is sustained over 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02505945.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald Bell
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, Colorado.
| | - John Lipham
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian E Louie
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Valerie Williams
- Thoracic Surgery Department, St. Elizabeth's Healthcare, Edgewood, Kentucky
| | - James Luketich
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Hill
- Department of Surgery, Adirondack Medical Center and Adirondack Surgical Group, Saranac Lake, New York
| | - William Richards
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Christy Dunst
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon
| | - Dan Lister
- Arkansas Heartburn Treatment Center, Baptist Health Medical Center, Heber Springs, Arkansas
| | | | - Patrick Reardon
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen Woods
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - F Paul Buckley
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Leena Khaitan
- Department of Surgery, Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Adrian Park
- Department of Surgery, Anne Arundel Health System and Johns Hopkins Medicine, Annapolis, Maryland
| | | | - Garth Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Ghulam Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Philip Katz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Klimara MJ, Randall DR, Allen J, Figueredo E, Johnston N. Proximal reflux: biochemical mediators, markers, therapeutic targets, and clinical correlations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020; 1481:127-138. [PMID: 32401362 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Airway reflux is implicated in the pathophysiology of a wide range of adult and pediatric upper and lower airway diseases. However, the diagnosis of proximal reflux-associated disease remains challenging due to evolving clinical criteria and institutional and regional variances in diagnostic practices. Evidence suggests that nonacidic contents of reflux may serve as both pathologic mediators of and biomarkers for reflux in the upper airway. Furthermore, they offer potential pharmaceutical and surgical intervention targets and are the focus of novel clinical diagnostic tools currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles J Klimara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Derrick R Randall
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Allen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Edgar Figueredo
- Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seattle VA Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nikki Johnston
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tsai C, Steffen R, Kessler U, Merki H, Lipham J, Zehetner J. Postoperative Dysphagia Following Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30:322-326. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
35
|
Spechler SJ. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Heartburn. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:343-359. [PMID: 32146950 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This report discusses the potential mechanisms that might underlie refractory GERD and functional heartburn, and how to distinguish among those mechanisms using a systematic evaluation that includes careful medical history, endoscopy with esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. The report provides an approach to patient management that depends on the underlying mechanism identified by this systematic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Jon Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, The Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, 3500 Gaston Avenue, 2 Hoblitzelle, Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Riva CG, Siboni S, Sozzi M, Lazzari V, Asti E, Bonavina L. High-resolution manometry findings after Linx procedure for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13750. [PMID: 31633258 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the Linx® system is a novel laparoscopic procedure for the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Only few data are available regarding the impact of Linx on high-resolution manometry (HRM) variables. METHODS The prospectively collected database of patients who underwent Linx procedure at a single institution was queried. All patients who completed pre- and postoperative HRM, GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, and functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS) questionnaire were included in the study. KEY RESULTS Forty-five out of 304 patients were included. At a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 10) after surgery, a statistically significant increase of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) total length (P = .002), intra-abdominal length (P = .001), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and esophagogastric contractile integral (EGJ-CI) was noted (P < .001). Distal esophageal amplitude (P = .004), mean distal contractile integral (DCI) (P < .001), post multiple repeated swallows DCI (P = .001), and the percent of normal peristalsis increased (P = .040). All patients were relieved of reflux symptoms. Ineffective esophageal motility reversed to normal in 36% of patients after surgery. The only factor significantly associated with postoperative dysphagia was preoperative dysphagia (P = .006). Postoperatively, a significant correlation between IRP and DCI (r = 0.361 and P = .019) and between IBP and DCI (r = 0.443 and P = .003) was found. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES The Linx procedure had a remarkable effect on esophageal motility in the short-term follow-up. It appears that the overall postoperative increase of IRP and IBP may justify the higher DCI values. Preoperative dysphagia was the only factor associated with postoperative dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Galdino Riva
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Stefano Siboni
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Marco Sozzi
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Veronica Lazzari
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Emanuele Asti
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schizas D, Mastoraki A, Papoutsi E, Giannakoulis VG, Kanavidis P, Tsilimigras D, Ntourakis D, Lyros O, Liakakos T, Moris D. LINX ® reflux management system to bridge the “treatment gap” in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review of 35 studies. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:294-305. [PMID: 32047777 PMCID: PMC7000944 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. When medical therapy is insufficient, surgical therapy is indicated and, until now, Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) constitutes the gold-standard method. However, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) using the LINX® Reflux Management System has recently emerged and disputes the standard therapeutic approach.
AIM To investigate the device’s safety and efficacy in resolving GERD symptoms.
METHODS This is a systematic review conducted in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL databases from inception until September 2019.
RESULTS Overall, 35 studies with a total number of 2511 MSA patients were included and analyzed. Post-operative proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) cessation rates reached 100%, with less bloating symptoms and a better ability to belch or vomit in comparison to LF. Special patient groups (e.g., bariatric or large hiatal-hernias) had promising results too. The most common postoperative complication was dysphagia ranging between 6% and 83%. Dilation due to dysphagia occurred in 8% of patients with typical inclusion criteria. Esophageal erosion may occur in up to 0.03% of patients. Furthermore, a recent trial indicated MSA as an efficient alternative to double-dose PPIs in moderate-to-severe GERD.
CONCLUSION The findings of our review suggest that MSA has the potential to bridge the treatment gap between maxed-out medical treatment and LF. However, further studies with longer follow-up are needed for a better elucidation of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Schizas
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Mastoraki
- 4th Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Eleni Papoutsi
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Vassilis G Giannakoulis
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Prodromos Kanavidis
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Diamantis Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 45830, United States
| | - Dimitrios Ntourakis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus
| | - Orestis Lyros
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Theodore Liakakos
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kirkham EN, Main BG, Jones KJB, Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS. Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2019; 107:44-55. [PMID: 31800095 PMCID: PMC6972716 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is reported to be an innovative alternative to antireflux surgery for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Although used in practice, little is known about how it has been evaluated. This study aimed to systematically summarize and appraise the reporting of MSA and its introduction into clinical practice, in the context of guidelines (such as IDEAL) for evaluating innovative surgical devices. METHODS Systematic searches were used to identify all published studies reporting MSA insertion. Data collected included patient selection, governance arrangements, surgeon expertise, technique description and outcome reporting. RESULTS Searches identified 587 abstracts; 39 full-text papers were included (1 RCT 5 cohort, 3 case-control, 25 case series, 5 case reports). Twenty-one followed US Food and Drug Administration eligibility criteria for MSA insertion. Twenty-six documented that ethical approval was obtained. Two reported that participating surgeons received training in MSA; 18 provided information about how MSA insertion was performed, although techniques varied between studies. Follow-up ranged from 4 weeks to 5 years; in 14 studies, it was less than 1 year. CONCLUSION Most studies on MSA lacked information about patient selection, governance, expertise, techniques and outcomes, or varied between studies. Currently, MSA is being used despite a lack of robust evidence for its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E N Kirkham
- Conformité Européenne Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.,Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - B G Main
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - K J B Jones
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - J M Blazeby
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - N S Blencowe
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective treatment for atypical symptoms caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:4909-4915. [PMID: 31792691 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07278-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine whether magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) could effectively treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who suffer primarily from atypical symptoms due to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). MSA has been shown to treat typical symptoms of GERD with good success, but its effect on atypical symptoms is unknown. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database was conducted for all patients who underwent MSA between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients had objective confirmation of GERD from ambulatory pH monitoring off anti-reflux medications (DeMeester score > 14.7). Symptoms were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively using GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaires. RESULTS There were 86 patients (38 males; 48 females) with a median age of 51.5 years. Total GERD HRQL scores improved from a mean of 38.79 to 6.53 (p < 0.01) and RSI scores improved from a mean of 20.9 to 8.1 (p < 0.01). Atypical symptoms evaluated from the RSI questionnaire include hoarseness, throat clearing, postnasal drip, breathing difficulties, and cough. All atypical symptoms were significantly improved at 1 year following MSA (p < 0.01). All three typical symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation were significantly improved based on pre and postoperative GERD HRQL questionnaires (p < 0.02). Ninety-one percent of patients were off their PPI and dissatisfaction with their current therapy decreased from 95% preoperatively to 13% postoperatively. CONCLUSION MSA is an effective treatment for typical and atypical GERD symptoms.
Collapse
|
40
|
Guidozzi N, Wiggins T, Ahmed AR, Hanna GB, Markar SR. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5487251. [PMID: 31069388 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been proposed as a less invasive, more appealing alternative intervention to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following MSA for GERD control in comparison with laparoscopic fundoplication. A systematic electronic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for single-arm cohort studies or comparative studies (with fundoplication) evaluating the use of MSA. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQOL), gas bloating, ability to belch, dysphagia, and reoperation was performed. The systematic review identified 6 comparative studies of MSA versus fundoplication and 13 single-cohort studies. Following MSA, only 13.2% required postoperative PPI therapy, 7.8% dilatation, 3.3% device removal or reoperation, and esophageal erosion was seen in 0.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups in requirement for postoperative PPI therapy (pooled odds ratio, POR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.40-2.95), GERD-HRQOL score (weighted mean difference, WMD = 0.34; 95%CI -0.70-1.37), dysphagia (POR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.57-1.55), and reoperation (POR = 1.23; 95%CI 0.26-5.8). However, when compared to fundoplication MSA was associated with significantly less gas bloating (POR = 0.34; 95%CI 0.16-0.71) and a greater ability to belch (POR = 12.34; 95%CI 6.43-23.7). In conclusion, magnetic sphincter augmentation achieves good GERD symptomatic control similar to that of fundoplication, with the benefit of less gas bloating. The safety of MSA also appears acceptable with only 3.3% of patients requiring device removal. There is an urgent need for randomized data directly comparing fundoplication with MSA for the treatment of GERD to truly evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Guidozzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Wiggins
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed R Ahmed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pandolfino J, Lipham J, Chawla A, Ferko N, Hogan A, Qadeer RA. A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1561-1572. [PMID: 31559575 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06916-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is sometimes treated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF); however, this is a non-reversible procedure associated with important side effects and the need for repeat surgery. Removable magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) devices are an alternative, effective, and safe treatment option for such patients who have some lower esophageal sphincter function. The objective of this study was to assess the economic impact of introducing MSA technology (i.e., LINX Reflux Management System) into current practice from a US-payer perspective. METHODS An economic budget impact model was developed over a 1-year time horizon that compared current treatment of GERD patients who are medically managed (but refractory) or receiving LNF to future treatment of GERD patients that included a mix of patients treated with medical management only, LNF, or MSA. Resources included within the analyses were index procedures (inpatient and outpatient use), reoperations (revisions and removals), readmissions, healthcare visits, diagnostic tests, procedures, and medications. Medicare payment rates were typically used to inform unit costs. RESULTS Assuming a hypothetical commercial insurance population of 1 million members, the base-case analysis estimated a net cost savings of $111,367 with introduction of the MSA. This translates to a savings of $0.01 per member per month. Results were largely driven by avoided inpatient procedures with use of the MSA device. Alternative analyses exploring the potential impact of increasing surgical volumes predicted that results would remain cost saving if the proportion of MSA market share taken from LNF was ≥ 90%. CONCLUSIONS This study predicts that the introduction of the MSA device would lead to favorable budget impact results for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical GERD for commercial payers. Future analyses will benefit from inclusion of middle-ground treatments as well as longer time horizons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pandolfino
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - John Lipham
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Nicole Ferko
- Cornerstone Research Group Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Hogan
- Cornerstone Research Group Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Rana A Qadeer
- Cornerstone Research Group Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Buckley FP, Havemann B, Chawla A. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: Optimal patient selection and referral care pathways. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:472-476. [PMID: 31523378 PMCID: PMC6715569 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Outcomes associated with magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been reported, however the optimal population for MSA and the related patient care pathways have not been summarized. This Minireview presents evidence that describes the optimal patient population for MSA, delineates diagnostics to identify these patients, and outlines opportunities for improving GERD patient care pathways. Relevant publications from MEDLINE/EMBASE and guidelines were identified from 2000-2018. Clinical experts contextualized the evidence based on clinical experience. The optimal MSA population may be the 2.2-2.4% of GERD patients who, despite optimal medical management, continue experiencing symptoms of heartburn and/or uncontrolled regurgitation, have abnormal pH, and have intact esophageal function as determined by high resolution manometry. Diagnostic work-ups include ambulatory pH monitoring, high-resolution manometry, barium swallow, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. GERD patients may present with a range of typical or atypical symptoms. In addition to primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists (GIs), other specialties involved may include otolaryngologists, allergists, pulmonologists, among others. Objective diagnostic testing is required to ascertain surgical necessity for GERD. Current referral pathways for GERD management are suboptimal. Opportunities exist for enabling patients, PCPs, GIs, and surgeons to act as a team in developing evidence-based optimal care plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Paul Buckley
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States
| | | | - Amarpreet Chawla
- Department of Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon Inc. (Johnson and Johnson), Cincinnati, OH 45242, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Esophageal surgery has become quite specialized, and both dedicated diagnostic and refined surgical techniques are required to deliver state-of-the-art care. The field has evolved to include endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage esophageal cancer and minimally invasive esophagectomy with the reconstruction of a gastric conduit for carefully selected patients with esophageal cancer or those with "end-stage" esophagus from benign diseases. Reoperative esophageal surgery after esophagectomy deserves special mention given that these patients, with improved survival, are presenting years after esophagectomy with functional and anatomic disorders that sometimes require surgical intervention. Different diagnostic modalities are essential for assessing patients and planning surgical treatment. Recognizing early and late postoperative complications on imaging may expedite and improve patient outcomes. Finally, endoscopic management of achalasia with peroral endoscopic myotomy and the use of the LINX device for gastroesophageal reflux disease are highly effective and minimally invasive treatments that may reduce complications, costs, and length of hospital stay.
Collapse
|
44
|
Left Transthoracic Approach for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device LINX Implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108:e225-e227. [PMID: 30885852 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX Reflux Management System (Torax Medical, St. Paul, MN) is a recently introduced surgical option with comparable therapeutic efficacy for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. An appropriately sized LINX device is usually placed around the gastroesophageal junction through a laparoscopic approach. In general, redo abdominal surgeries are technically challenging, with a higher risk of associated morbidity. This highlights the need to obtain feasible alternative access to place the LINX device for certain patient populations. In this case series, we described 2 patients who underwent LINX device implantation through left thoracotomy because of previous abdominal surgeries that prohibited a transabdominal approach.
Collapse
|
45
|
Bell R, Lipham J, Louie B, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:14-22.e1. [PMID: 30031018 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS GERD patients frequently complain of regurgitation of gastric contents. Medical therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is frequently ineffective in alleviating regurgitation symptoms, because PPIs do nothing to restore a weak lower esophageal sphincter. Our aim was to compare effectiveness of increased PPI dosing with laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. METHODS One hundred fifty-two patients with GERD, aged ≥21 years with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite 8 weeks of once-daily PPI therapy, were prospectively enrolled at 21 U.S. sites. Participants were randomized 2:1 to treatment with twice-daily (BID) PPIs (N = 102) or to laparoscopic MSA (N = 50). Standardized foregut symptom questionnaires and ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring were performed at baseline and at 6 months. Relief of regurgitation, improvement in foregut questionnaire scores, decrease in esophageal acid exposure and reflux events, discontinuation of PPIs, and adverse events were the measures of efficacy. RESULTS Per protocol, 89% (42/47) of treated patients with MSA reported relief of regurgitation compared with 10% (10/101) of the BID PPI group (P < .001) at the 6-month primary endpoint. By intention-to-treat analysis, 84% (42/50) of patients in the MSA group and 10% (10/102) in the BID PPI group met this primary endpoint (P < .001). Eighty-one percent (38/47) of patients with MSA versus 8% (7/87) of patients with BID PPI had ≥50% improvement in GERD-health-related quality of life scores (P < .001), and 91% (43/47) remained off of PPI therapy. A normal number of reflux episodes and acid exposures was observed in 91% (40/44) and 89% (39/44) of MSA patients, respectively, compared with 58% (46/79) (P < .001) and 75% (59/79) (P = .065) of BID PPI patients at 6 months. No significant safety issues were observed. In MSA patients, 28% reported transient dysphagia; 4% reported ongoing dysphagia. CONCLUSION Patients with GERD with moderate-to-severe regurgitation, especially despite once-daily PPI treatment, should be considered for minimally invasive treatment with MSA rather than increased PPI therapy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02505945.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald Bell
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, Colorado, USA
| | - John Lipham
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Brian Louie
- Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - James Luketich
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Hill
- Adirondack Surgical Group, Saranac Lake, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Dan Lister
- Arkansas Heartburn Treatment Center, Heber Springs, Arkansas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jon Gould
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | - Leena Khaitan
- University Hospitals, Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Adrian Park
- Anne Arundel Health System, Annapolis, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Garth Jacobsen
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ghulam Abbas
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a modern treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, laparoscopic fundoplication remains the gold standard. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of MSA patients at a reflux center. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients that underwent MSA between March 2012 and November 2017. Out of 110 patients, 68 with a follow-up >3 months were included. Postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake, GERD-Health-related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and alimentary satisfaction (AS) were assessed. Postoperative esophageal functioning tests were performed in 50% of patients. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA; hiatal repair was performed in 31 cases. The median OR time was 27 min, and no intraoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 4.2-45). Endoscopic dilatation was performed in 2 patients (3%) and device removal in another 2 cases. The postoperative GERD-HRQL score was significantly reduced (3 vs. 24; p < 0.001) and the median AS was 8/10. Preoperative experienced heartburn, regurgitations and dysphagia were eliminated in 92, 96 and 100%. Postoperative new-onset difficulties swallowing with solids only were reported to occur occasionally by 16% and rarely by 21% of patients. Satisfaction with heartburn relief was 95%, and the overall outcome was rated excellent/good in 89%. PPI dependency was eliminated in 87%. The median total percentage pH < 4 and number of reflux episodes were significantly reduced. Postoperative pH results were negative or slightly above the norm in 79% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION Sphincter augmentation results in significantly reduced reflux symptoms, increased GERD-specific Quality of Life and excellent alimentary satisfaction with low perioperative morbidity. This procedure should be considered an excellent alternative to fundoplication in the treatment of GERD.
Collapse
|
47
|
Richards WO, Mcrae C. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD. Am Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481808401132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
We have recently introduced laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) combined with hiatal hernia repair for treatment of patients with medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MSA is a novel surgical approach to the treatment of severe GERD, in which magnetic beads are secured around the lower esophageal sphincter, augmenting the lower esophageal sphincter function as an anti-reflux barrier. We hypothesize that patients undergoing MSA will achieve GERD relief, equal to that obtained after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD HRQL) Questionnaire is a validated clinical tool that was used to quantify patient outcomes in terms of GERD-related symptoms both on and off proton pump inhibitors and after acute radiation syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed data from patients at our institution enrolled in a prospective institutional review board–approved database “Registry Outcomes Anti-Reflux Surgery” that applies objective and subjective information about patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery. Information from both the database and patient HRQL scores were used to compare the effectiveness of medical intervention with acute radiation syndrome (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and MSA) in decreasing GERD-related symptoms in patients. Results are expressed as mean ± SE, and single-factor ANOVA test was used to compare groups. We found that MSA and laparoscopic fundoplication both lead to a comparable decrease in HRQL score and an increase in patient satisfaction when compared with patient's preoperative symptoms with maximum proton pump inhibitor use. In addition, our study shows that MSA is a safe minimally invasive anti-reflux procedure without the negative side-effects, such as gas bloat, inability to belch, and inability to vomit, commonly associated with NF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William O. Richards
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama Health System, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Carly Mcrae
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama Health System, Mobile, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zadeh J, Andreoni A, Treitl D, Ben-David K. Spotlight on the Linx™ Reflux Management System for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: evidence and research. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2018; 11:291-300. [PMID: 30214323 PMCID: PMC6124788 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s113679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) management typically involves lifestyle modification and medical therapy utilizing acid reducing agents such as histamine blockers and proton pump inhibitors. In severe cases refractory to such treatments, surgical therapy may be indicated. The gold standard for surgical treatment of GERD is the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In recent years, a new technique known as magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been developed using the Linx™ Reflux Management System. This is an implantable ring of magnetic beads that is placed around the esophagus at the gastroesophageal junction to restore lower esophageal integrity. The aim of this review is to discuss the current literature regarding indications, surgical technique, efficacy, and complications of MSA using the Linx device. METHODS A standardized literature search was performed yielding 367 abstracts. After elimination due to duplicates between databases and irrelevance, 96 articles remained. The information found to be significant and non-redundant was included in this review. CONCLUSION After several years of clinical application, the Linx device has been shown to not only be effective for the management of GERD but also be as effective as fundoplication. With respect to safety, the most common complication of MSA is dysphagia. This often resolved without intervention, but esophageal dilation or device explanation are occasionally necessary. Not fully appreciated in earlier reviews, erosion of the device into the esophagus appears to be the most significant complication of the device after extended follow-up. While very rare, the potentially severe consequences of this phenomenon suggest that the device should be used with some restraint and that patients should be made aware of this potential morbidity. Fortunately, in the few cases of device erosion described in the literature reviewed, the Linx device was easily and safely removed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Zadeh
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Anthony Andreoni
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Daniela Treitl
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Kfir Ben-David
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alicuben ET, Tatum JM, Bildzukewicz N, Samakar K, Samaan JS, Silverstein EN, Sandhu K, Houghton CC, Lipham JC. Regression of intestinal metaplasia following magnetic sphincter augmentation device placement. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:576-579. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6367-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
50
|
Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies. Updates Surg 2018; 70:323-330. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|