Thoracoscopy Versus Thoracotomy in the Repair of Esophageal Atresia with Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the rapid advancement of robotic surgery across various surgical domains, only cases of robotic repair (RR) for neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) have been reported. Comprehensive studies comparing RR and thoracoscopic repair (TR) are lacking. The authors aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RR and TR for EA.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 155 EA neonates undergoing RR (79 patients) or TR (76 patients) between August 2020 and February 2023 using propensity score matching. Asymmetric port distribution and step-trocar insertion techniques were applied during RR. Demographics and surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After matching, 63 patients (out of 79) in RR group and 63 patients (out of 76) in TR group were included. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between two groups, except for longer total operative time (173.81 vs. 160.54 min; P <0.001) and shorter anastomotic time (29.52 vs. 40.21 min; P <0.001) in RR group. Compared with TR group, the RR group had older age at surgery (8.00 vs. 3.00 days; P <0.001), but a comparable pneumonia rate. More importantly, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (4.76 vs. 19.05%, P =0.013), anastomotic stricture (15.87 vs. 31.74%, P =0.036) within 1 year postoperatively, and unplanned readmission (32.26 vs. 60.00%, P =0.030) within 2 years postoperatively were lower in RR group than in TR group.

CONCLUSIONS

RR is a technically safe and effective option for EA patients. This approach delays the age of surgery without increasing respiratory complication rates while reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications and unplanned readmission.

Novel Left-Sided Thoracoscopic Approach to Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Post-Fistula Tracheal Diverticula

BACKGROUND

Recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (RTEF) is usually a consequence of leakage or other complications after esophageal atresia repair performed through right-sided access. This results in extensive intrapleural adhesions, and open redo surgery poses a challenge. Alternatively, endoscopic endotracheal fistula obliteration usually requires repetitive procedures, and its success rate varies significantly between centers. We present a novel approach to recurrent fistulas. The innovation is in reaching the fistula through the virgin field via left-sided three-port thoracoscopy instead of classical right-sided thoracotomy.

METHODS

This is a presentation of a new operative technique based on a retrospective case series of patients operated on at our department between 2016 and 2023.

RESULTS

Eight patients after esophageal atresia repair (six with RTEF and two with post-fistula tracheal diverticula) were successfully treated with left-sided thoracoscopy. There were no conversions. One patient required rethoracoscopy for chylothorax. Another one, after RTEF closure, underwent multiple endoscopic obliterations of subsequent tracheal diverticulum. No other major complications nor re-recurrences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Left-sided thoracoscopy in redo esophageal atresia has the advantage of a "virgin" operative field and grants feasible access to the RTEF or tracheal diverticulum. We believe that this approach is worth further exploration because it combines minimal invasiveness with high effectiveness without all the consequences of a thoracotomy.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes

Introduction: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare defect in the continuity of the esophagus, with the absent portion forming an upper and lower segment. Despite both thoracoscopic and conventional open repair (OR) techniques being well established worldwide, the literature remains unclear as to the comparison of surgical outcomes and efficacy of each procedure. Aim: To conduct a systematic review to determine which technique for EA repair, thoracoscopic or open, has the better outcome. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) compliant literature search returned 14 full text articles for analysis of demographic information and surgical outcomes. Results: Major comorbidities were more likely in the OR group (P < .05) with all other surgical outcomes comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review highlights that the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing thoracoscopic repair for EA are comparable with those of the conventional OR.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair for Oesophageal Atresia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 359 Patients at a Single Center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to define the effectiveness of thoracoscopic versus open repair of gross type C oesophageal atresia (EA) based on the experience of a single centre over a decade.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who were admitted to Hunan Children's Hospital between January, 2010 and December, 2021 and underwent repair surgery for type C EA.

RESULTS

A total of 359 patients underwent type C EA repair during the study period, of which 142 were completed via an open approach and 217 were attempted via a thoracoscopic approach (seven converted to open surgery). There were no differences in the demographics or comorbidities between the patients of thoracoscopy and thoracotomy (open repair) groups. The median operating time was 109 [90, 133] min in the thoracoscopic surgery group, which was slightly shorter than that in the open repair group (115 [102, 128] min, p = 0.059). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 41 (18.9%) and 35 (24.6%) infants in the thoracoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively (p = 0.241). Thirteen patients (3.6%) died in the hospital without significant differences in the repair approach. With a median follow-up of 23.7 months, 38 (13.6%) participants had one or more anastomotic strictures requiring dilatation, without significant differences in the repair approach (p = 0.994).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic repair of congenital EA is safe, and has perioperative and medium-term outcomes similar to those of open surgery. This technique is recommended only in hospitals with experienced teams of endoscopic paediatric surgeons and anaesthesiologists.

Short-term and mid-term effects of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: No anastomotic leaks or conversions to open technique

The frequency rate of esophageal anastomosis leaks after thoracoscopic correction of esophageal atresia (EA) in the current literature is reported as 5.6%-24.7% and a conversion rate of 2%-53%. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the characteristics of EA and analysis of the safety and efficacy of EA repair with the use of the thoracoscopic approach in a single academic center, as well as risk factors analysis in the context of short-term and mid-term follow-up status. A retrospective analysis of the management of all consecutive newborns affected by EA hospitalized in our department over a period between 2013 and 2022, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management, together with the outcome, complications and long-term follow-up status was performed. A total of 38 patients with a median birth weight of 2,570 g (range; 1,020-3,880) were treated over the study period, including 30/38 (78.9%) with additional congenital anomalies. Overall, 30 patients underwent primary anastomosis of the esophagus and eight underwent a multistaged procedure, with or without an initial ligation of the tracheoesophageal fistula and delayed primary anastomosis. Overall survival for all patients was 0.894 ± 0.050, with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. We noted neither anastomotic leaks nor conversions to open technique in our cohort. Implementation of vancomycin prophylaxis was successful in preventing postoperative central venous access-related infectious complications. At the end of the follow-up, 85% of patients have a Lansky performance score ≥80. Risk factors analysis for length of hospitalization, overall survival, Lansky performance status, and neurological impairment were analyzed. In conclusion, we have found that the outcome of thoracoscopic repair of EA in terms of surgery-dependent morbidity (anastomosis leakage, conversion rate to open surgery), provides benefit to those previously reported in the literature, regardless of the prognostic criteria of the classification system.

Operative Volume of Newborn Surgery in German University Hospitals: High Volume Versus Low Volume Centers

INTRODUCTION

 Adequate patient volume is essential for the maintenance of quality, meaningful research, and training of the next generation of pediatric surgeons. The role of university hospitals is to fulfill these tasks at the highest possible level. Due to decentralization of pediatric surgical care during the last decades, there is a trend toward reduction of operative caseloads. The aim of this study was to assess the operative volume of the most relevant congenital malformations at German academic pediatric surgical institutions over the past years.

METHODS

 Nineteen chairpersons representing university-chairs in pediatric surgery in Germany submitted data on 10 index procedures regarding congenital malformations or neonatal abdominal emergencies over a 3-year period (2015 through 2017). All institutions were categorized according to the total number of respective cases into "high," "medium," and "low" volume centers by terciles. Some operative numbers were verified using data from health insurance companies, when available. Finally, the ratio of cumulative case load versus prevalence of the particular malformation was calculated for the study period.

RESULTS

 From 2015 through 2017, a total 2,162 newborns underwent surgery for congenital malformations and neonatal abdominal emergencies at German academic medical centers, representing 51% of all expected newborn cases nationwide. The median of cases per center within the study period was 101 (range 18-258). Four institutions (21%) were classified as "high volume" centers, four (21%) as "medium volume" centers, and 11 (58%) as "low volume" centers. The proportion of patients operated on in high-volume centers varied per disease category: esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula: 40%, duodenal atresia: 40%, small and large bowel atresia: 39%, anorectal malformations: 40%, congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 56%, gastroschisis: 39%, omphalocele: 41%, Hirschsprung disease: 45%, posterior urethral valves: 39%, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)/focal intestinal perforation (FIP)/gastric perforation (GP): 45%.

CONCLUSION

 This study provides a national benchmark for neonatal surgery performed in German university hospitals. The rarity of these cases highlights the difficulties for individual pediatric surgeons to gain adequate clinical and surgical experience and research capabilities. Therefore, a discussion on the centralization of care for these rare entities is necessary.

An experimental study on long term outcomes after magnetic esophageal compression anastomosis in piglets

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown that a patent, watertight esophageal anastomosis can be accomplished safely using specially-shaped magnets in piglets. However, it is unclear whether such a magnetic esophageal compression anastomosis (MECA) remains patent in the long-term. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of MECA in an experimental pig model over an observation period of 2 months.

METHODS

Ten piglets underwent creation of an MECA with custom-made 8 mm magnets and a U-shaped esophageal bypass loop to allow peroral nutrition at eight weeks of life. Two weeks later, the bypass loop was closed surgically, requiring the pigs to swallow via the newly created magnetic compression anastomosis. The pigs were fed soft chow for 2 months. They were monitored for weight gain and signs of dysphagia. At the endpoint of two months, esophagoscopy and contrast esophagography was performed. After removal of the esophagus, the tissues were macroscopiocally and histologically assessed.

RESULTS

Six piglets survived until the endpoint. In two pigs, closure of the bypass loop failed, these demonstrated mean weight gain of 792 gs/day [95% Confidence interval 575 to 1009 gs/day]. Weight gain in four pigs that exclusively fed via the magnetic anastomosis averaged 577 gs/day [95% confidence interval 434 to 719 gs/day (p = 0.18)]. There were no signs of dysphagia. All magnets passed with the stool within 16 days. After 2 months, a well-formed magnetic compression anastomosis was visible and easily negotiated with a 6.5 mm endoscope. Esophogram and macroscopic findings confirmed patentency of the esophageal anastomoses. Histopathology showed a circular anastomosis lined with contiguous epithelium.

CONCLUSION

MECA creates a long-term functional and patent anastomosis in pigs. This concept may facilitate minimally-invasive esophageal atresia repair by obviating a technically challenging and time-consuming hand-sewn anastomosis.

Association of operative approach with outcomes in neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the impact of thoracoscopic repair on perioperative outcomes in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric database from 2014 to 2018 was queried for all neonates who underwent operative repair of EA/TEF. Operative approach based on intention to treat was correlated with perioperative outcomes, including 30-day postoperative adverse events, in logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 855 neonates, initial thoracoscopic repair was performed in 133 (15.6%) cases. Seventy (53%) of these cases were converted to open. Those who underwent thoracoscopic repair were more likely to be full-term (p = 0.03) when compared to those in the open repair group. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome measures based on surgical approach except for operative time (thoracoscopic: 217 min vs. open: 180 min, p<0.001). A major cardiac comorbidity (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; p = 0.003) and preoperative ventilator requirement (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9; p = 0.034) were the only risk factors associated with adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic neonatal repair of EA/TEF continues to be used sparingly, is associated with high conversion rates, and has similar perioperative outcomes when compared to open repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.