A Mouse Peritonitis Model for the Study of Glycopeptide Efficacy in GISA Infections

Synergistic effect of linezolid with fosfomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in an experimental Galleria mellonella model

BACKGROUND/PURPOSES

Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections is challenging owing to widespread multidrug resistance. There is now considerable interest in the potential of combination therapies. Although linezolid/fosfomycin combination appears to be a promising treatment option based on in vitro data, further preclinical work is needed. In this study, the Galleria mellonella system was employed to study the in vivo efficacy of this combination in order to determine whether it should be explored further for the treatment of S. aureus infections.

METHODS

The antimicrobial activity of linezolid and fosfomycin alone and in combination was assessed versus four S. aureus. Synergy studies were performed using the microtitre plate chequerboard assay and time-kill methodology. The in vivo activity of linezolid/fosfomycin combination was assessed using a G. mellonella larvae model.

RESULTS

The combination of linezolid and fosfomycin was synergistic and bacteriostatic against four tested strains. Treatment of G. mellonella larvae infected with lethal doses of S. aureus resulted in significantly enhanced survival rates when low-dose of combination has no significant differences with high-dose combination (P > 0.05), G. mellonella hemolymph burden of S. aureus suggest that combination therapy with rapid and sustained bacteriostatic activity compared monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This work indicated that linezolid combination with fosfomycin has synergistic effect against S. aureus in vitro and in an experimental G. mellonella model, and it suggests that high-dose of linezolid and fosfomycin may not necessary.

Teicoplanin inhibits Ebola pseudovirus infection in cell culture

There is currently no approved antiviral therapy for treatment of Ebola virus disease. To discover readily available approved drugs that can be rapidly repurposed for treatment of Ebola virus infections, we screened 1280 FDA-approved drugs and identified glycopeptide antibiotic teicoplanin inhibiting Ebola pseudovirus infection by blocking virus entry in the low micromolar range. Teicoplanin could be evaluated further and incorporated into ongoing clinical studies.

Engineered Phagemids for Nonlytic, Targeted Antibacterial Therapies

The increasing incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections is creating a global public health threat. Because conventional antibiotic drug discovery has failed to keep pace with the rise of resistance, a growing need exists to develop novel antibacterial methodologies. Replication-competent bacteriophages have been utilized in a limited fashion to treat bacterial infections. However, this approach can result in the release of harmful endotoxins, leading to untoward side effects. Here, we engineer bacterial phagemids to express antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and protein toxins that disrupt intracellular processes, leading to rapid, nonlytic bacterial death. We show that this approach is highly modular, enabling one to readily alter the number and type of AMPs and toxins encoded by the phagemids. Furthermore, we demonstrate the effectiveness of engineered phagemids in an in vivo murine peritonitis infection model. This work shows that targeted, engineered phagemid therapy can serve as a viable, nonantibiotic means to treat bacterial infections, while avoiding the health issues inherent to lytic and replicative bacteriophage use.

Hp1404, a new antimicrobial peptide from the scorpion Heterometrus petersii

Antimicrobial peptides have attracted much interest as a novel class of antibiotics against a variety of microbes including antibiotics resistant strains. In this study, a new cationic antimicrobial peptide Hp1404 was identified from the scorpion Heterometrus petersii, which is an amphipathic α-helical peptide and has a specific inhibitory activity against gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Hp1404 can penetrate the membrane of S. aureus at low concentration, and disrupts the cellular membrane directly at super high concentration. S. aureus does not develop drug resistance after multiple treatments with Hp1404 at sub MIC concentration, which is possibly associated with the antibacterial mechanism of the peptide. In addition, Hp1404 has low toxicity to both mammalian cells (HC₅₀  =  226.6 µg/mL and CC₅₀ > 100 µg/mL) and balb-c mice (Non-toxicity at 80 mg/Kg by intraperitoneal injection and LD₅₀  =  89.8 mg/Kg by intravenous injection). Interestingly, Hp1404 can improve the survival rate of the MRSA infected balb-c mice in the peritonitis model. Taken together, Hp1404 may have potential applications as an antibacterial agent.

Dissecting the mechanisms of linezolid resistance in a Drosophila melanogaster infection model of Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

 Mini-host models are simple experimental systems to study host-pathogen interactions. We adapted a Drosophila melanogaster infection model to evaluate the in vivo effect of different mechanisms of linezolid (LNZ) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

METHODS

 Fly survival was evaluated after infection with LNZ-resistant S. aureus strains NRS119 (which has mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA [rRNA]), CM-05 and 004-737X (which carry cfr), LNZ-susceptible derivatives of CM-05 and 004-737X (which lack cfr), and ATCC 29213 (an LNZ-susceptible control). Flies were then fed food mixed with LNZ (concentration, 15-500 µg/mL). Results were compared to those in mouse peritonitis, using LNZ via oral gavage at 80 and 120 mg/kg every 12 hours.

RESULTS

 LNZ at 500 µg/mL in fly food protected against all strains, while concentrations of 15-250 µg/mL failed to protect against NRS119 (survival, 1.6%-20%). An in vivo effect of cfr was only detected at concentrations of 30 and 15 µg/mL. In the mouse peritonitis model, LNZ (at doses that mimic human pharmacokinetics) protected mice from challenge with the cfr+ 004-737X strain but was ineffective against the NRS119 strain, which carried 23S rRNA mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

 The fly model offers promising advantages to dissect the in vivo effect of LNZ resistance in S. aureus, and findings from this model appear to be concordant with those from the mouse peritonitis model.

Efficacy of fosfomycin and its combination with linezolid, vancomycin and imipenem in an experimental peritonitis model caused by a Staphylococcus aureus strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of therapies including fosfomycin against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (hGISA). Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h. Peritonitis in C57BL/6 mice was induced by intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml. Four hours later (0 h), therapy was started and the treatment groups were: control (not treated), fosfomycin (100 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), fosfomycin plus linezolid, fosfomycin plus vancomycin and fosfomycin plus imipenem, receiving subcutaneous therapy over 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. In vitro, fosfomycin showed a synergistic effect when combined with the other antimicrobials tested. In the animal model, fosfomycin combinations were effective and significantly reduced the bacteraemia rates achieved in the control, imipenem and vancomycin groups (p < 0.05). The best combination in vivo was fosfomycin plus imipenem. Also, fosfomycin plus linezolid was significantly better than vancomycin alone, reducing the bacterial concentration in the peritoneal fluid. In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo, fosfomycin in combination with linezolid, vancomycin or imipenem exerted a good activity. Fosfomycin plus imipenem was the most active combination, decreasing 3 log CFU/ml, and appears to be a promising combination for clinical practice.

In vitro and in vivo activities of linezolid alone and combined with vancomycin and imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of linezolid (35 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), linezolid+imipenem, linezolid+vancomycin and vancomycin+imipenem against two clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides using time–kill curves and the murine peritonitis model. Time–kill curves were performed over 24 h. For the murine peritonitis model, peritonitis was induced by the intraperitoneal inoculation of 10⁸ CFU/ml of each bacterial strain. Four hours later (0 h), the mice were randomly assigned to a control group or to therapeutic groups receiving subcutaneous treatment for 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. The time–kill curves showed that the addition of linezolid to imipenem yielded synergistic results after 24 h. The addition of linezolid decreased vancomycin activity. In the animal model, vancomycin and linezolid monotherapies produced comparable bacterial decreases in mice infected with each strain but linezolid achieved higher rates of blood sterilisation. Linezolid tested either in monotherapy or in combination showed similar efficacy against both strains in terms of bacterial killing, number of negative blood cultures and survival. Linezolid and vancomycin were moderately bactericidal and similar in efficacy against glycopeptide-intermediate or -resistant S. aureus. Linezolid combinations, as effective as linezolid tested alone, could be considered as alternative options for the treatment of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) infections.

Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is not uncommon, even when MRSA is susceptible to vancomycin. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration has any influence on the mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia.

METHODS

A total of 414 episodes of MRSA bacteremia were prospectively followed-up from 1991 through 2005. MIC of vancomycin for the first isolate was determined by E-test. Clinical variables recorded were age, comorbidity, prior administration of vancomycin, use of corticosteroids, prognosis of underlying disease, source of bacteremia, the need for mechanical ventilation, shock, and mortality. A "treatment group" variable was created and defined as follows: (1) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1 microg/mL (38 episodes), (2) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1.5 microg/mL (90 episodes), (3) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (40 episodes), and (4) receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (246 episodes). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Episodes caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL were independently associated with a lower risk of shock (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.75). Multivariate analysis selected receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (OR, 6.39; 95% CI, 1.68-24.3), receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.20-10.9), increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04), use of corticosteroids (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.04-3.29), an ultimately (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 2.85-36.8) or rapidly (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.10) fatal underlying disease, high-risk (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.89-6.88) and intermediate-risk (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.17-4.04) sources of bacteremia, and shock (OR, 7.38; 95% CI, 4.11-13.3) as the best predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia was significantly higher when the empirical antibiotic was inappropriate and when vancomycin was empirically used for treatment of infection with strains with a high vancomycin MIC (>1 microg/mL).

Daptomycin bactericidal activity and correlation between disk and broth microdilution method results in testing of Staphylococcus aureus strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin

A total of 207 Staphylococcus aureus strains, including 105 well-characterized strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (17 vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA] and 88 heteroresistant VISA [hVISA] strains) and 102 wild-type methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA-WT) strains were tested by reference/standardized broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods, as well as by Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden), against daptomycin and vancomycin. The lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent that killed > or = 99.9% of the initial inoculum was defined as the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) endpoint, and time-kill curves were performed in selected strains to further evaluate bactericidal activity. All MRSA-WT and hVISA strains were inhibited by < or = 1 microg/ml of daptomycin, while the VISA strains showed slightly higher daptomycin MICs (range, 0.5 to 4 microg/ml). All daptomycin MBC results were at the MIC or twofold higher. In contrast, 14.7% of MRSA-WT, 69.3% of hVISA, and all VISA strains showed a vancomycin MBC/MIC ratio of > or = 32 or an MBC of > or = 16 microg/ml (tolerant). The correlation coefficients between broth microdilution and disk diffusion method results were low for daptomycin (0.07) and vancomycin (0.11). Eight (3.8%) strains (all hVISA or VISA) were "nonsusceptible" to daptomycin by broth microdilution methods but susceptible by the disk diffusion method. For vancomycin, 35 (16.9%) strains were nonsusceptible by broth microdilution methods but susceptible by disk diffusion methods. In conclusion, daptomycin was highly bactericidal against S. aureus strains, and its bactericidal activity was not affected by decreased susceptibility to vancomycin. In contrast, many (one in seven) contemporary MRSA-WT, the majority of hVISA, and all VISA strains showed vancomycin MBC/MIC ratios consistent with tolerance, a predictor of poor clinical response. Disk diffusion tests generally failed to detect strains categorized as nonsusceptible to daptomycin or vancomycin by the reference broth microdilution method or Etest, and reassessment of breakpoints should be immediately attempted for MIC methods suggested as the test of choice.

Microbiological features of vancomycin in the 21st century: minimum inhibitory concentration creep, bactericidal/static activity, and applied breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes or detect resistant strains

The results of vancomycin susceptibility tests document that the drug continues to have activity against a wide variety of gram-positive pathogens. The subsequent emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, the persistent failure of vancomycin therapy against strains tested as susceptible, and the more recent discoveries of vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains have compromised the use of vancomycin. Although analyses of surveillance studies fail to demonstrate "minimum inhibitory concentration creep" among populations of wild-type enterococci, streptococci, or staphylococci, enterococci with acquired resistance to vancomycin continue to evolve. The dominantly used automated commercial tests poorly recognize vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which necessitates the use of expensive supplemental screening tests. Monitoring for appropriate serum levels of vancomycin and determinations of the bactericidal activity of vancomycin appear to best predict clinical outcome, thus creating additional diagnostic burdens for clinical laboratories. Improvements in current test methods with breakpoint criteria and expanded use of the vancomycin bactericidal assays to detect "tolerant" strains will be required to increase the value of vancomycin treatment or to refocus therapy toward the use of newer, alternative agents.

Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin tested against clinical strains of indicated species isolated in North American medical centers (2003)

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, groups A and B beta-hemolytic streptococci, and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis. We evaluated the daptomycin spectrum against these pathogens by testing 2759 clinical strains consecutively collected in more than 30 hospitals located across the United States and Canada. The isolates were susceptibility tested against daptomycin and many comparators by the reference broth microdilution method. Daptomycin was very active against indicated species with the highest MIC results being 1, 2, and 0.5 microg/mL for S. aureus, E. faecalis, and beta-hemolytic streptococci, respectively. All isolates tested were considered susceptible to daptomycin, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and FDA breakpoints, and daptomycin was the most potent (lowest MIC90) among selected antimicrobials commonly used to treat Gram-positive infections. Resistance to oxacillin or vancomycin did not influence daptomycin activity against S. aureus or E. faecalis.

Experimental study on the efficacy of combinations of glycopeptides and β-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

OBJECTIVES

The combination of glycopeptides and beta-lactams has been proposed as an alternative therapy against infections due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, though its role is still controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy (decrease in bacterial concentration after 24 h therapy) of these combinations both in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Four strains of S. aureus with different glycopeptide susceptibility (MICs of vancomycin from 1 to 8 mg/L) were used. In vitro experiments were performed by means of time-kill curves while we used the mouse peritonitis model for in vivo evaluation.

RESULTS

Combinations of glycopeptides and beta-lactams showed synergy in in vitro time-kill curves against the four staphylococcal strains, the highest efficacy being detected against the glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strain (MIC = 8 mg/L) (Deltalog 24 h = -3.19 cfu/mL for vancomycin at 1/2 x MIC and oxacillinat 1/64 x MIC versus -0.56 cfu/mL for vancomycin alone at 1/2 x MIC). On the other hand, no significant increase in efficacy was observed in vivo in the experimental model. The efficacy of the combinations decreased in correlation to the decreasing susceptibility of the strains to glycopeptides, showing only residual activity against the GISA strain (Deltalog 24 h = -1.42 cfu/mL for vancomycin and cloxacillin versus -1.22 cfu/mL for vancomycin).

CONCLUSIONS

In the in vivo setting we were unable to demonstrate the synergism between glycopeptides and beta-lactams observed in vitro; nor did combinations show antagonism against any of the strains. Though the usefulness of these combinations cannot be totally ruled out in highly specific clinical conditions, it seems unlikely that they will provide a serious therapeutic alternative in most hGISA and GISA infections in the coming years.