Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections among patients with neutropenia over a 6-year period in South Korea

Predictors for vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium transforming from colonization to infection: a case control study

Background

Little is known about risk factors for subsequent infections among vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) colonizers, especially characterized by concordant pulsotypes (CP) of paired colonization and infection-related isolates.

Methods

This case-control study was conducted at a teaching hospital between 2011 and 2014. Targeted patients received active surveillance culture for VREfm by anal swabs at admission. Cases were those who developed VREfm infection within 180 days after colonization of VREfm. Controls were those colonized with VREfm without subsequent VREfm infection. CP were defined by similarities ≥86.7% using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis between paired colonization and infection-related isolates.

Results

Ninety-seven cases and 194 controls were enrolled. By conditional multivariable logistic regression analysis, the risk factors for subsequent infection among VREfm colonizers were intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.32; 95% CI, 3.61–24.02), receipt of central venous catheters (CVC) (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30–8.82), and utilization of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (aOR, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.79–9.20, and aOR, 5.32; 95% CI, 1.85– 10.29, respectively) (all P ≤ 0.01). Fifty-six (57.7%) of case patients belonged to the CP group, which were associated with ICU admission (aOR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.38–10.13), and infection developing within 30 days after colonization (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.25–8.91).

Conclusions

Among VREfm colonizers, being admitted to ICU and receiving CVC or broad spectrum cephalosporins, were the risk factors for subsequent infections. These findings highlight the importance of conducting more strict infection control measures on specific groups of VREfm colonizers.

Real-time PCR for the rapid detection of vanA, vanB and vanM genes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR to the detection of vanA, vanB and vanM in enterococcal isolates.

METHODS

A total of 343 strains, including 253 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) strains and 90 non-VRE strains, were tested by both quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR and gel-based PCR assay.

RESULTS

When differentiating among three genotypes of vanA, vanB and vanM in VRE strains, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy and consistency of the quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR were all 100%. Minimum. Inhibitory concentration (MIC) results showed that there was a wide MIC range of vancomycin and teicoplanin for the strains that harboring vanA/vanM gene respectively or harboring vanA and vanM genes simultaneously. However, the VRE strains with vanB genotype all were sensitive to teicoplanin.

CONCLUSION

Considering the excellent PPV and low NPV, real-time PCR would be useful to monitor VRE-colonized or infected patients. However, further evaluation of the assay's performance in the clinical specimens is required, especially when considering that high level of PCR inhibitors present in these samples.

Comparison of Enterococcus faecium Bacteremic Isolates from Hematologic and Non-hematologic Patients: Differences in Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characteristics

Background

Enterococcus faecium, especially vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VREfm), is a major concern for patients with hematologic diseases. Exposure to antibiotics including fluoroquinolone, which is used as a routine prophylaxis for patients with hematologic (MH) diseases, has been reported to be a risk factor for infection with vancomycin-resistant eneterocci. We compared the characteristics of E. faecium isolates according to their vancomycin susceptibility and patient group (MH vs non-MH patients).

Methods

A total of 120 E. faecium bacteremic isolates (84 from MH and 36 from non-MH patients) were collected consecutively, and their characteristics (susceptibility, multilocus sequence type [MLST], Tn1546 type, and the presence of virulence genes and plasmids) were determined.

Results

Among the vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEfm) isolates, resistance to ampicillin (97.6% vs 61.1%) and high-level gentamicin (71.4% vs 38.9%) was significantly higher in isolates from MH patients than in those from non-MH patients. Notably, hyl, esp, and pEF1071 were present only in isolates with ampicillin resistance. Among the VREfm isolates, ST230 (33.3%) and ST17 (26.2%) were predominant in MH patients, while ST17 (61.1%) was predominant in non-MH patients. Plasmid pLG1 was more prevalent in E. faecium isolates from MH patients than in those from non-MH patients, regardless of vancomycin resistance. Transposon analysis revealed five types across all VREfm isolates.

Conclusions

The antimicrobial resistance profiles and molecular characteristics of E. faecium isolates differed according to the underlying diseases of patients within the same hospital. We hypothesize that the prophylactic use of fluoroquinolone might have an effect on these differences.

Outbreaks caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in hematology and oncology departments: A systematic review

Background

Vancomycin-resistance in Enterococcus faecium (VRE) poses a major threat in health care settings. It is well known that patients in hematology and oncology departments are especially at risk of nosocomial VRE acquisition. This systematic review of the literature provides data on the main sources, transmission modes and potential risk factors for VRE acquisition as well as appropriate infection control measures in order to terminate such nosocomial outbreaks.

Methods

Data on nosocomial VRE outbreaks on hematology and oncology wards was retrieved from the Outbreak Database and PubMed.

Results

A total of 35 VRE outbreaks describing 757 affected patients and 77 deaths were included in this review. The most frequent site of pathogen detection were stool samples or rectal swabs (57% of all isolation sites), followed by blood cultures (30%). The most common outbreak source was an index patient. The main modes of transmission were 1) hands of health care workers, 2) contact to a contaminated environment and 3) patient-to-patient contact. The most common risk factor for VRE positivity was prior antibiotic treatment. The most common infection control measures performed were screening and isolating or cohorting of patients.

Conclusion

A rational use of antibiotics in hematology and oncology units is recommended in order to reduce selection pressure on resistant pathogens such as VRE. In addition the importance of hand hygiene should be stressed to all staff whenever possible.

Where is the difference between an epidemic and a high endemic level with respect to nosocomial infection control measures? An analysis based on the example of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in hematology and oncology departments

Some infection control recommendations distinguish epidemic and endemic levels for infection control. However, it is often difficult to separate long lasting outbreaks from high endemic levels and it remains open, if this distinction is really useful. Aim: To compare infection control measures in endemic and epidemic outbreaks. Methods: The example of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreaks in haematology or oncology departments was used to analyse differences in infection control measures between outbreaks and high endemic levels. The outbreak database and PubMed, including long lasting outbreaks, were used for this analysis. Two time limits were used for separation: 6 and 12 months. In addition, monoclonal and polyclonal outbreaks were distinguished. Findings: A total of 36 outbreaks were included. 13 outbreaks lasted 6 months or less, 9 outbreaks more than 6 months but at maximum 12 months and 9 more than 12 months. For the remaining outbreaks, no information about their duration was available. Altogether, 11 outbreaks were monoclonal and 20 polyclonal. Considering infection control measures, there were almost no differences between the different groups compared. Patient screening was given up in 37.5% of long lasting outbreaks (>12 months) and hand hygiene not reported in the majority of polyclonal outbreaks (77.8%). Conclusion: Despite many institutions trying to add further infection control measures in case of an outbreak, evidence based infection control measures should be implemented in endemic and epidemic situations. The crucial aspect is probably the degree of implementation and its control in both situations.

High Prevalence of vanM in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Shanghai, China

The vanM gene was first found in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREm) isolate in Shanghai in 2006. In this study, we found that, in 70 VREm strains isolated in nine Shanghai hospitals from 2006 to 2014, vanM was more prevalent than the vanA gene (64.3% [45/70] versus 35.7% [25/70]). The vanM-type isolates showed similar antimicrobial susceptibility patterns with the vanA types. The vanM-type VREm emerged and disseminated in Shanghai.

Epidemiology and molecular typing of VRE bloodstream isolates in an Irish tertiary care hospital

OBJECTIVES

Ireland has the highest rate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) isolated from blood of nosocomial patients in Europe, which rose from 33% (110/330) in 2007 to 45% (178/392) in 2012. No other European country had a VREfm rate from blood cultures of >25%. Our aim was to elucidate the reasons for this significantly higher rate in Ireland.

METHODS

The epidemiology and molecular typing of VRE from bloodstream infections (BSIs) was examined in a tertiary care referral hospital and isolates were compared with those from other tertiary care referral centres in the region.

RESULTS

The most common source of VRE BSIs was intra-abdominal sepsis, followed by line-related infection and febrile neutropenia. Most of the isolates were positive for vanA; 52% (43/83) possessed the esp gene and 12% (10/83) possessed the hyl gene. Genotyping by SmaI macrorestriction analysis (PFGE) of isolates revealed clonal relatedness between bloodstream isolates and environmental isolates. VRE BSI isolates from two other tertiary care hospitals in the Dublin region showed relatedness by PFGE analysis. MLST revealed four STs (ST17, ST18, ST78 and ST203), all belonging to the clonal complex of hospital-associated strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Irish VRE BSI isolates have virulence factor profiles as previously reported from Europe. Typing analysis shows the spread of individual clones within the hospital and between regional tertiary care hospitals. Apart from transmission of VRE within the hospital and transfer of colonized patients between Irish hospitals, no other explanation for the persistently high VREfm BSI rate in Ireland has been found.

Co-colonization of vanA and vanB Enterococcus faecium of clonal complex 17 in a patient with bacteremia due to vanA E. faecium

A 53-year-old Vietnamese man with liver cirrhosis was transferred from a Vietnamese hospital to our tertiary care hospital in Korea in order to undergo a liver transplantation. Bacteremia due to vanA Enterococcus faecium was diagnosed, and stool surveillance cultures for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were positive for both vanA and vanB E. faecium. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that the 2 vanA VRE isolates from the blood and stool were clonal, but the vanB VRE was unrelated to the vanA VRE. vanA and vanB VRE were ST64 and ST18, single-allele variations of clonal complex 17, respectively. This is the first case report of vanA VRE bacteremia in a Vietnamese patient and demonstrates the reemergence of vanB VRE since a single outbreak occurred 15years ago in Korea. The reemergence of vanB VRE emphasizes the importance of VRE genotyping to prevent the spread of new VRE strains.

Comparison of genetic epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from humans and poultry

This study was conducted to investigate the molecular characteristics and genetic relatedness of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) isolates obtained from humans and poultry in Korea. A total of 147 VREF isolates from humans (71 clinical isolates) and poultry (76 isolates) in Korea were compared with respect to their antibiotic susceptibilities, organization of the Tn1546 transposon element, detection of virulence genes (esp and hyl), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). All of the human and poultry isolates had the vanA gene and 11.3% (8/71) of the clinical isolates showed the VanB phenotype/vanA genotype. PCR mapping of the Tn1546 elements was different for isolates of the two groups: human isolates were classified into five transposon types, whereas all poultry isolates were identical to Tn1546 of E. faecium strain BM4147. The esp gene was detected in both human (93.0%, 66/71) and poultry (26.3%, 20/76) isolates, as was the hyl gene (human isolates: 80.3%, 57/71; poultry isolates: 26.3%, 20/76). Using MLST, the 71 human isolates could be divided into ten sequence types (STs) belonging to clonal complex (CC) 17 (except for one singleton). The 76 poultry isolates were categorized into 14 STs and 88.2% (67/76) of the poultry isolates belonged to CC26. PFGE typing of the human isolates demonstrated diverse PFGE profiles among the strains. However, the PFGE patterns of the poultry isolates were possibly related to the strains collected from individual farms. These data suggest that epidemic clonal groups of human and poultry VREFs in Korea have evolved through different evolutionary processes.

Detection of an unusual van genotype in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium hospital isolate

We highlight the detection of a rare vanM genotype in Enterococcus faecium. This isolate exhibited a VanB phenotype, with high levels of resistance to vancomycin (MIC, >256 mg/liter) and susceptibility to teicoplanin (MIC, 1 mg/liter). It was, however, vanB negative by PCR. Further screening for other van loci revealed the presence of a complete vanM operon.