Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Effects of Age, Sex, and Postconcussive Symptoms on Domain-Specific Quality of Life a Year After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors influencing longitudinal changes in patients' scores across 6 domains of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

DESIGN

This was a longitudinal cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Eligible patients with a new diagnosis of mTBI were recruited from the outpatient clinics of the neurosurgery departments of 3 teaching hospitals in Taipei City, Taiwan. In total, 672 patients participated in the baseline assessment. Postinjury follow-up was conducted at 6 and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Six domains of the 37-item QOLIBRI: Cognition, Self, Daily Life and Autonomy, Social Relationships, Emotions, and Physical Problems.

RESULTS

Linear mixed-effects analyses revealed that, among patients younger than 60 years, the scores of the Cognition, Self, Daily Life and Autonomy, and Social Relationships domains significantly increased 6 months after injury; furthermore, their scores of the Cognition, Self, and Daily Life and Autonomy significantly increased 12 months after injury. By contrast, among patients 60 years and older, the scores of these domains reduced from baseline to 6 and 12 months. No significant sex-based difference was observed in the changes in scores of any QOLIBRI domain. At 6 and 12 months post-injury, the scores of the Cognition, Emotions, and Physical Problems domains were significantly higher for patients with postconcussive symptoms than for those without these symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although multiple characteristics of patients significantly affected their baseline scores on the 6 domains of the QOLIBRI, only age and postconcussive symptoms were significantly associated with longitudinal changes in their scores 6 and 12 months after mTBI.

Group-Based Patterns of Life Satisfaction and Functional Independence over the 10 Years after Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: A Model Systems Study

BACKGROUND

Older adults who sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been shown to have reduced functional independence and life satisfaction relative to younger individuals with TBI. The purpose of this study was to examine the covarying patterns of functional independence and life satisfaction over the 10 years after TBI in adults who were 60 years of age or older upon injury.

METHOD

Participants were 1841 individuals aged 60 or older at the time of TBI, were enrolled in the longitudinal TBI Model Systems database, and had Functional Independence Measure and Satisfaction with Life Scale scores during at least one time point at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after TBI.

RESULTS

A k-means cluster analysis identified four distinct group-based longitudinal patterns of these two variables. Three cluster groups suggested that functional independence and life satisfaction generally traveled together over time, with one group showing relatively high functional independence and life satisfaction over time (Cluster 2), one group showing relatively moderate functional independence and life satisfaction (Cluster 4), and one group showing relatively low functional independence and life satisfaction (Cluster 1). Cluster 3 had relatively high functional independence over time but, nonetheless, relatively low life satisfaction; they were also the youngest group upon injury. Participants in Cluster 2 generally had the highest number of weeks of paid competitive employment but lower percentages of underrepresented racial/ethnic minority participants, particularly Black and Hispanic individuals. Women were more likely to be in the cluster with the lowest life satisfaction and functional independence (Cluster 1).

CONCLUSION

Functional independence and life satisfaction generally accompany one another over time in older adults, although this does not always occur, as life satisfaction can still be low in a subgroup of older individuals after TBI with higher functioning. These findings contribute to a better understanding of post-TBI recovery patterns in older adults over time that may inform treatment considerations to improve age-related discrepancies in rehabilitation outcomes.

Profound prospective assessment of radiological and functional outcome 6 months after TBI in elderly

BACKGROUND

Recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults is usually affected by the presence of comorbidities, leading to more severe sequelae in this age group than in younger patients. However, there are only few reports that prospectively perform in-depth assessment of outcome following TBI in elderly.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims at documenting structural brain characteristics and functional outcome and quality of life in elderly patients 6 months after TBI and comparing these data with healthy volunteers undergoing the same assessments.

METHODS

Thirteen TBI patients ≥ 65 years old, admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), between 2019 and 2022 due to TBI, including all injury severities, and a group of 13 healthy volunteers with similar demographic characteristics were prospectively included in the study. At admission, demographic, injury, and CT scan data were collected in our database. Six months after the accident, a brain MRI scan and standardized assessments of frailty, sleep quality, cognitive function, motor function, and quality of life were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients and 13 volunteers were included in the study, with a median age of 74 and 73 years, respectively. Nine out of the 13 patients presented with a mild TBI. The patient group had a significantly higher level of frailty than the control group, presenting a mean Reported Edmonton Frailty Scale score of 5.8 (SD 2.7) vs 0.7 (SD 1.1) (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between patient and control brain volumes, fluid attenuated inversion recovery white matter hyperintensity volumes, number of lesions and blackholes, and fractional anisotropy values. Patients demonstrated a significantly higher median reaction time in the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (22.3 s vs 17.6, p = 0.03) and Reaction Time (0.5 s vs 0.4 s, p < 0.01) subtests in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Furthermore, patients had a lower mean score on the first Box and Blocks test with the right hand (46.6 vs 61.7, p < 0.01) and a significantly higher mean score in the Timed-Up & Go test (13.1 s vs 6.2 s, p = 0.02) and Timed Up & Go with cognitive dual task (16.0 s vs 10.2 s, p < 0.01). Substantially lower QOLIBRI total score (60.4 vs 85.4, p < 0.01) and QOLIBRI-OS total score (53.8 vs 88.5, p < 0.01) were also observed in the patients' group.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, TBI patients ≥ 65 years old when compared with elder controls showed slightly worse cognitive performance and poorer motor function, higher fall risk, but a substantially reduced QoL at 6 months FU, as well as significantly higher frailty, even when the TBI is classified as mild. No statistically significant differences were found in structural brain characteristics on MRI. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to refine the impact of TBI versus frailty on function and QoL in elderly.

Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research

It is important to measure quality of life (QoL) after traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet limited studies have compared QoL inventories. In 2579 TBI patients, orthopedic trauma controls, and healthy friend control participants, we compared the Quality of Life After Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS), developed for TBI patients, to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), an index of generic life satisfaction. We tested the hypothesis that group differences (TBI and orthopedic trauma vs. healthy friend controls) would be larger for the QOLIBRI-OS than the SWLS and that the QOLIBRI-OS would manifest more substantial changes over time in the injured groups, demonstrating more relevance of the QOLIBRI-OS to traumatic injury recovery. (1) We compared the group differences (TBI vs. orthopedic trauma control vs. friend control) in QoL as indexed by the SWLS versus the QOLIBRI-OS and (2) characterized changes across time in these two inventories across 1 year in these three groups. Our secondary objective was to characterize the relationship between TBI severity and QoL. As compared with healthy friend controls, the QOLIBRI reflected greater reductions in QoL than the SWLS for both the TBI group (all time points) and the orthopedic trauma control group (2 weeks and 3 months). The QOLIBRI-OS better captured expected improvements in QoL during the injury recovery course in injured groups than the SWLS, which demonstrated smaller changes over time. TBI severity was not consistently or robustly associated with self-reported QoL. The findings imply that, as compared with the SWLS, the QOLIBRI-OS appears to identify QoL issues more specifically relevant to traumatically injured patients and may be a more appropriate primary QoL outcome measure for research focused on the sequelae of traumatic injuries.

Comparison of Four Quality of Life Inventories for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries and Orthopedic Injuries

The value of assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients has been increasingly recognized in recent years. Yet, research examining generic and TBI-specific quality of life (QOL) methodologies within this population has been limited, rendering decisions to use one alternative over another difficult and based largely on conceptual grounds. The current study compared widely used generic QoL/HRQOL measures (Satisfaction With Life Scale, 36-item Short Form Survey) and newer population-specific HRQoL measures (Quality of Life after Brain Injury [QOLIBRI], Trauma-Quality of Life [TQoL]) among 77 TBI and 23 orthopedically injured trauma control patients. The QOLIBRI Cognition and Physical Problems subscales were the only HRQoL scores across the four instruments administered that differentiated between patient groups: participants with TBI reported being significantly less satisfied with their cognitive abilities and more bothered by physical problems. Analyses of the unique population-specific QOLIBRI content revealed that 12.2-31.5% of TBI patients endorsed dissatisfaction and 28.8-51.4% endorsed being bothered by items unique to the QOLIBRI. Endorsement rates for unique TQoL items ranged from 1.4-75.7%. Overall, the QOLIBRI and TQoL appear to capture important information pertinent to patients with TBI and trauma. Inclusion of these disease-specific HRQoL measures is recommended over the use of only generic measures among TBI populations.

Quality of life measures in older adults after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

On average older adults experiencing TBI are hospitalized four times as often, have longer hospital stays, and experience slower recovery trajectories and worse functional outcomes compared to younger populations with the same injury severity. A standard measure of Qol for older adults with TBI would facilitate accurate and reliable data across the individual patient care continuum and across clinical care settings, as well as support more rigorous research studies of metadata.

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate patient reported Qol measures in studies with older adults post TBI.

METHOD

A systematic review was carried out focusing on the various tools to measure Qol in older adults, ≥ 65 years of age with a diagnosis of TBI. Data bases searched included Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychInfo from date of inception to September 25, 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. Nine different tools were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings based on the comparison of reliability and construct validity of the Qol measures reported in this review suggest that no single instrument is superior to all others for our study population. Future research in this field should include the enrollment of larger study samples of older adults. Without these future efforts, the ability to detect an optimal Qol measure will be hindered.

Prediction of long-term quality of life after severe traumatic brain injury based on variables at hospital admission

Objectives: Variables collected early after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) could predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of patients with a low HRQoL 4 years after sTBI and to develop a prediction model including early variables.Methods: Adult patients with both sTBI [abbreviated injury score of the head region (HAIS) >3] and disease-specific HRQoL assessments using the 'Quality of Life after Brain Injury' (QOLIBRI) were included. The outcome was the total score (TS) of QOLIBRI; cutoff for low HRQoL: <60 points. A multivariate logistic regression model and prediction model were performed.Results: One hundred-sixteen patients [median age 50.8 years (IQR 25.9-62.8; 21.6% >65 years)] were included; 68 (58.6%) with HAIS = 4, 48 (41.4%) with HAIS = 5. Median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 13 (IQR 3-15). Median TS was 77 (IQR 60-88). Low HRQoL was observed in 28 patients (24.1%). Two variables were associated with low HRQoL: GCS <13, working situation other than employed or retired. The prediction model had an AUROC of 0.765; calibration was moderate (Hosmer Lemeshow Chi2 6.82, p = .556).Conclusion: One in four patients had a low HRQoL after 4 years. A lower GCS and working situations were associated with low HRQoL.

Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology, Outcomes, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions

This review of the literature on traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults focuses on incident TBI sustained in older adulthood ("geriatric TBI") rather than on the separate, but related, topic of older adults with a history of earlier-life TBI. We describe the epidemiology of geriatric TBI, the impact of comorbidities and pre-injury function on TBI risk and outcomes, diagnostic testing, management issues, outcomes, and critical directions for future research. The highest incidence of TBI-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths occur in older adults. Higher morbidity and mortality rates among older versus younger individuals with TBI may contribute to an assumption of futility about aggressive management of geriatric TBI. However, many older adults with TBI respond well to aggressive management and rehabilitation, suggesting that chronological age and TBI severity alone are inadequate prognostic markers. Yet there are few geriatric-specific TBI guidelines to assist with complex management decisions, and TBI prognostic models do not perform optimally in this population. Major barriers in management of geriatric TBI include under-representation of older adults in TBI research, lack of systematic measurement of pre-injury health that may be a better predictor of outcome and response to treatment than age and TBI severity alone, and lack of geriatric-specific TBI common data elements (CDEs). This review highlights the urgent need to develop more age-inclusive TBI research protocols, geriatric TBI CDEs, geriatric TBI prognostic models, and evidence-based geriatric TBI consensus management guidelines aimed at improving short- and long-term outcomes for the large and growing geriatric TBI population.