Comparison of fungal and nonfungal infections in a broad-based surgical patient population

Efficacy of Candida dubliniensis and Fungal β-Glucans in Inducing Trained Innate Immune Protection Against Inducers of Sepsis

Fungal-bacterial intra-abdominal infections (IAI) can lead to sepsis with significant morbidity and mortality. We have established a murine model of Candida albicans (Ca) and Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) IAI that results in acute lethal sepsis. Prior intraperitoneal or intravenous inoculation with low virulence Candida dubliniensis (Cd) confers high level protection against lethal Ca/Sa IAI and sepsis. Protection via Cd immunization is associated with decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediated by Gr-1⁺ putative myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) representing a novel form of trained innate immunity (TII). The objective of these studies was to determine the extent of Cd-mediated TII against sepsis of broad origin and explore the potential of fungal cell wall components as abiotic immunogen alternatives to induce TII, including zymosan depleted of TLR2 activity (d-zymosan), or purified preparations of β-glucan. Immunized mice were challenged 14 days post-immunization with a lethal array of live or abiotic inducers of sepsis, including Ca/Sa, Ca/Escherichia coli (Ca/Ec), LPS or untreated zymosan. Results showed that live Cd immunization was protective against sepsis induced by Ca/Ec and zymosan, but not LPS. Similar to protection against Ca/Sa, survival was dependent on Gr-1+ cells with no role for macrophages. Among the fungal cell wall compounds as immunogens, immunization with d-zymosan and an alkali-treated form of β-glucan also resulted in significant protection against sepsis induced by Ca/Sa or Ca/Ec, but not LPS sepsis. Again, there was a strong dependence on Gr-1+ cells for protection with one exception, an added role for macrophages in the case of protection induced by alkali-treated β-glucan. Overall, these results demonstrate that immunization with Cd as well as abiotic fungal cell components are capable of Gr-1+ cell-mediated trained innate immune protection against sepsis of broad microbial origin. In addition, abiotic β-glucans represent potential alternatives to live Cd for protection against lethal polymicrobial sepsis.

Candida/Staphylococcal Polymicrobial Intra-Abdominal Infection: Pathogenesis and Perspectives for a Novel Form of Trained Innate Immunity

Polymicrobial sepsis is difficult to diagnose and treat and causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially when fungi are involved. In vitro, synergism between Candida albicans and various bacterial species has been described for many years. Our laboratory has developed a murine model of polymicrobial intra-abdominal infection with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus, demonstrating that polymicrobial infections cause high levels of mortality, while monoinfections do not. By contrast, closely related Candida dubliniensis does not cause synergistic lethality and rather provides protection against lethal polymicrobial infection. This protection is thought to be driven by a novel form of trained innate immunity mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which we are proposing to call "trained tolerogenic immunity". MDSC accumulation has been described in patients with sepsis, as well as in in vivo sepsis models. However, clinically, MDSCs are considered detrimental in sepsis, while their role in in vivo models differs depending on the sepsis model and timing. In this review, we will discuss the role of MDSCs in sepsis and infection and summarize our perspectives on their development and function in the spectrum of trained innate immune protection against fungal-bacterial sepsis.

Identification of Specific Components of the Eicosanoid Biosynthetic and Signaling Pathway Involved in Pathological Inflammation during Intra-abdominal Infection with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus

Polymicrobial intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly when fungal pathogens are involved. Our experimental murine model of IAI involving intraperitoneal inoculation of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus results in synergistic lethality (∼80%) due to exacerbated inflammation. Monomicrobial infection results in no mortality, despite a microbial burden and dissemination similar to those in a coinfection. In the coinfection model, the immunomodulatory eicosanoid prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) was determined to be necessary and sufficient to induce mortality, implicating PGE₂ as the central mediator of the amplified inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to identify key components of the PGE₂ biosynthetic and signaling pathway involved in the inflammatory response and explore whether these can be targeted to prevent or reduce mortality. Using selective pharmacological inhibitors of cyclooxygenases (COX) or PGE₂ receptor antagonists in the C. albicans-S. aureus IAI mouse model, we found that inhibition of COX and/or blocking of PGE₂ receptor 1 (EP1) or PGE₂ receptor 3 (EP3) signaling reduced proinflammatory cytokine production, promoted interleukin-10 production, reduced cellular damage in the peritoneal cavity, and, most importantly, significantly improved survival. The greatest effect on survival was obtained by the simultaneous inhibition of COX-1 activity and EP1 and EP3 receptor signaling. Importantly, early inhibition of PGE₂ pathways dramatically improved the survival of fluconazole-treated mice compared with that achieved with fluconazole treatment alone. These findings indicate that COX-1 and the EP1 and EP3 receptors mediate the downstream pathological effects of PGE₂ during polymicrobial IAI and may serve as effective therapeutic targets.

Basis for selecting optimum antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis

Adequate management of severely ill patients with secondary peritonitis requires supportive therapy of organ dysfunction, source control of infection and antimicrobial therapy. Since secondary peritonitis is polymicrobial, appropriate empiric therapy requires combination therapy in order to achieve the needed coverage for both common and more unusual organisms. This article reviews etiological agents, resistance mechanisms and their prevalence, how and when to cover them and guidelines for treatment in the literature. Local surveillances are the basis for the selection of compounds in antibiotic regimens, which should be further adapted to the increasing number of patients with risk factors for resistance (clinical setting, comorbidities, previous antibiotic treatments, previous colonization, severity…). Inadequate antimicrobial regimens are strongly associated with unfavorable outcomes. Awareness of resistance epidemiology and of clinical consequences of inadequate therapy against resistant bacteria is crucial for clinicians treating secondary peritonitis, with delicate balance between optimization of empirical therapy (improving outcomes) and antimicrobial overuse (increasing resistance emergence).

Intraabdominal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit

Intraabdominal infections are frequent and dangerous entity in intensive care units. Mortality and morbidity are high, causes are numerous, and treatment options are variable. The intensivist is challenged to recognize and treat intraabdominal infections in a timely fashion to prevent complications and death. Diagnosis of intraabdominal infection is often complicated by confounding underlying disease or masked by overall comorbidity. Current research describes a wide heterogeneity of patient populations, making it difficult to suggest a general treatment regimen and stressing the need of an individualized approach to decision making. Early focus-oriented intervention and antibiotic coverage tailored to the individual patient and hospital is warranted.

Aggressive versus conservative initiation of antimicrobial treatment in critically ill surgical patients with suspected intensive-care-unit-acquired infection: a quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial treatment in critically ill patients can either be started as soon as infection is suspected or after objective data confirm an infection. We postulated that delaying antimicrobial treatment of patients with suspected infections in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) until objective evidence of infection had been obtained would not worsen patient mortality.

METHODS

We did a 2-year, quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the SICU of the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA, USA). From Sept 1, 2008, to Aug 31, 2009, aggressive treatment was used: patients suspected of having an infection on the basis of clinical grounds had blood cultures sent and antimicrobial treatment started. From Sept 1, 2009, to Aug 31, 2010, a conservative strategy was used, with antimicrobial treatment started only after objective findings confirmed an infection. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Admissions to the SICU for the first and second years were 762 and 721, respectively, with 101 patients with SICU-acquired infections during the aggressive year and 100 patients during the conservative year. Compared with the aggressive approach, the conservative approach was associated with lower all-cause mortality (13/100 [13%] vs 27/101 [27%]; p=0·015), more initially appropriate therapy (158/214 [74%] vs 144/231 [62%]; p=0·0095), and a shorter mean duration of therapy (12·5 days [SD 10·7] vs 17·7 [28·1]; p=0·0080). After adjusting for age, sex, trauma involvement, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and site of infection, the odds ratio for the risk of mortality in the aggressive therapy group compared with the conservative therapy group was 2·5 (95% CI 1·5-4·0).

INTERPRETATION

Waiting for objective data to diagnose infection before treatment with antimicrobial drugs for suspected SICU-acquired infections does not worsen mortality and might be associated with better outcomes and use of antimicrobial drugs.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health.

Choosing antibiotics for intra-abdominal infections: what do we mean by "high risk"?

BACKGROUND

The definition of "high risk" in intra-abdominal infections remains vague. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient characteristics associated with a high risk of isolation of resistant pathogens from an intra-abdominal source.

METHODS

All complicated intra-abdominal and abdominal organ/space surgical site infections treated over a ten-year period in a single hospital were analyzed. Infections were categorized by pathogen(s). Organisms designated "resistant" were those that had a reasonable probability of being resistant to the broad-spectrum agents imipenem/cilastatin and piperacillin/tazobactam, and included non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa), resistant gram-positive pathogens, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and fungi. Patient characteristics were analyzed to define associations with the risk of isolation of "resistant" pathogens.

RESULTS

A total of 2,049 intra-abdominal infections were treated during the period of study, of which 1,182 had valid microbiological data. The two genera of pathogens isolated from more than 25% of health care-associated infections and more commonly than from community-acquired infections were Enterococcus spp. (29%) and Candida spp. (33%). Health care association, corticosteroid use, organ transplantation, liver disease, pulmonary disease, and a duodenal source all were associated with resistant pathogens. By multivariable analysis, several acute and chronic measures of disease were predictive of death, with a strong interaction between solid organ transplantation, resistant pathogens, and death. Other links between specific pathogens and patient characteristics were documented, for example, between fungal infection and a gastric, duodenal, or small bowel source, and between liver transplantation and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of clinical characteristics, it may be possible to identify patients with intra-abdominal infections caused by pathogens that are potentially resistant to broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. Under these circumstances, and if warranted clinically, broadened coverage probably ought to include specific anti-enterococcal and anti-candidal therapy.