1
|
Schultz BG, Kotton CN, Jutlla G, Ressa R, de Lacey T, Chowdhury E, Bo T, Fenu E, Gelone DK, Poirrier JE, Amorosi SL. Cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus conventional antiviral therapies for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus infection with or without genotypic resistance: A US perspective. J Med Virol 2024; 96:e29609. [PMID: 38647051 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with or without resistance. A two-stage Markov model was designed using data from the SOLSTICE trial (NCT02931539), real-world multinational observational studies, and published literature. Stage 1 (0-78 weeks) comprised clinically significant CMV (csCMV), non-clinically significant CMV (n-csCMV), and dead states; stage 2 (78 weeks-lifetime) comprised alive and dead states. Total costs (2022 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for the maribavir and IAT cohorts. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Compared with IAT, maribavir had lower costs ($139 751 vs $147 949) and greater QALYs (6.04 vs 5.83), making it cost-saving and more cost-effective. Maribavir had higher acquisition costs compared with IAT ($80 531 vs $65 285), but lower costs associated with administration/monitoring ($16 493 vs $27 563), adverse events (AEs) ($11 055 vs $16 114), hospitalization ($27 157 vs $33 905), and graft loss ($4516 vs $5081), thus making treatment with maribavir cost-saving. Maribavir-treated patients spent more time without CMV compared with IAT-treated patients (0.85 years vs 0.68 years), leading to lower retreatment costs for maribavir (cost savings: -$42 970.80). Compared with IAT, maribavir was more cost-effective for transplant recipients with refractory CMV, owing to better clinical efficacy and avoidance of high costs associated with administration, monitoring, AEs, and hospitalizations. These results can inform healthcare decision-makers on the most effective use of their resources for post-transplant refractory CMV treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bob G Schultz
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ginita Jutlla
- Parexel, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Modeling, London, UK
| | - Riccardo Ressa
- Parexel, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Modeling, London, UK
| | - Tam de Lacey
- Parexel, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Modeling, London, UK
| | - Emtiyaz Chowdhury
- Parexel, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Modeling, London, UK
| | - Tien Bo
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Daniele K Gelone
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Stacey L Amorosi
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piret J, Boivin G. Management of Cytomegalovirus Infections in the Era of the Novel Antiviral Players, Letermovir and Maribavir. Infect Dis Rep 2024; 16:65-82. [PMID: 38247977 PMCID: PMC10801527 DOI: 10.3390/idr16010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections may increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Until recently, standard antiviral drugs against CMV were limited to viral DNA polymerase inhibitors (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir with a risk for cross-resistance. These drugs may also cause serious side effects. This narrative review provides an update on new antiviral agents that were approved for the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Letermovir was approved in 2017 for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adults who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maribavir followed four years later, with an indication in the treatment of adult and pediatric transplant patients with refractory/resistant CMV disease. The target of letermovir is the CMV terminase complex (constituted of pUL56, pUL89 and pUL51 subunits). Letermovir prevents the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids. Maribavir is a pUL97 kinase inhibitor, which interferes with the assembly of capsids and the egress of virions from the nucleus. Both drugs have activity against most CMV strains resistant to standard drugs and exhibit favorable safety profiles. However, high-level resistance mutations may arise more rapidly in the UL56 gene under letermovir than low-grade resistance mutations. Some mutations emerging in the UL97 gene under maribavir can be cross-resistant with ganciclovir. Thus, letermovir and maribavir now extend the drug arsenal available for the management of CMV infections and their respective niches are currently defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guy Boivin
- Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walti CS, Khanna N, Avery RK, Helanterä I. New Treatment Options for Refractory/Resistant CMV Infection. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11785. [PMID: 37901297 PMCID: PMC10600348 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in monitoring and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). CMV infection may fail to respond to standard first- and second-line antiviral therapies with or without the presence of antiviral resistance to these therapies. This failure to respond after 14 days of appropriate treatment is referred to as "resistant/refractory CMV." Limited data on refractory CMV without antiviral resistance are available. Reported rates of resistant CMV are up to 18% in SOT recipients treated for CMV. Therapeutic options for treating these infections are limited due to the toxicity of the agent used or transplant-related complications. This is often the challenge with conventional agents such as ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir. Recent introduction of new CMV agents including maribavir and letermovir as well as the use of adoptive T cell therapy may improve the outcome of these difficult-to-treat infections in SOT recipients. In this expert review, we focus on new treatment options for resistant/refractory CMV infection and disease in SOT recipients, with an emphasis on maribavir, letermovir, and adoptive T cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Simone Walti
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nina Khanna
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Robin K. Avery
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kleiboeker SB. Prevalence of cytomegalovirus antiviral drug resistance in transplant recipients. Antiviral Res 2023; 215:105623. [PMID: 37150409 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2023.105623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant human pathogen, especially for immunocompromised patients, often treated with one or more antiviral drugs. Although the prevalence of resistance is low, the impact of drug resistant CMV infections on patient outcomes is high and genotypic testing is recommended when resistance is suspected. To assess the prevalence of CMV drug resistance mutations among samples submitted for genotypic testing, 2750 patient sample results were analyzed. Testing was performed by sequencing for ganciclovir (GCV), cidofovir (CDV), foscarnet (FOS), maribavir (MBV) and/or letermovir (LMV) resistance conferring mutations. Of the 2750 patient samples, 826 (30.04%) had resistance to one or more anti-CMV drug. Resistance mutations were most common in UL97, with 27.64% and 9.96% of samples having GCV and MBV mutations, respectively. Resistance mutations in UL54 were less common, with 6.11%, 5.98% and 1.76% of samples having GCV, CDV and FOS mutations, respectively. For LMV, resistance mutations in UL56 were present in 7.17% of samples, with mutations at codon 325 representing 80.95% of the observed LMV resistance mutations. Resistance to two drugs was identified in 215 samples and to 3 or more drugs in 35 samples. While a high prevalence of CMV resistance mutations was identified, this must be taken in the context of healthcare providers submitting samples from patients with suspected resistant CMV strains. For these patients, rapid monitoring for resistance allows treatment modifications based on objective results rather than empiric drug selection, which is particularly relevant given the presence of mutations conferring resistance to more than one drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven B Kleiboeker
- Eurofins Viracor Clinical Diagnostics, 18000 West 99th Street, Lenexa, KS, 66219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kotton CN, Kamar N. New Insights on CMV Management in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Prevention, Treatment, and Management of Resistant/Refractory Disease. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:333-342. [PMID: 36583845 PMCID: PMC9925645 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00746-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can have both direct and indirect effects after solid-organ transplantation, with a significant impact on transplant outcomes. Prevention strategies decrease the risk of CMV disease, although CMV still occurs in up to 50% of high-risk patients. Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the main drugs currently used for preventing and treating CMV. Emerging data suggest that letermovir is as effective as VGCV with fewer hematological side effects. Refractory and resistant CMV also still occur in solid-organ-transplant patients. Maribavir has been shown to be effective and have less toxicity in the treatment of refractory and resistant CMV. In this review paper, we discuss prevention strategies, refractory and resistant CMV, and drug-related side effects and their impact, as well as optimal use of novel anti-CMV therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Nelson Kotton
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 5, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nassim Kamar
- grid.414295.f0000 0004 0638 3479Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, CHU Toulouse Rangueil, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
- grid.7429.80000000121866389INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, France
- grid.15781.3a0000 0001 0723 035XPaul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Maribavir was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November 2021 for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease that is refractory to treatment (with or without genotypic resistance) with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet. Maribavir is an oral benzimidazole riboside with potent and selective multimodal anti-CMV activity. It utilizes a novel mechanism of action which confers activity against CMV strains that are resistant to traditional anti-CMV agents, and also offers a more favorable safety profile relative to the dose-limiting side effects of previously available therapies. Maribavir was initially studied as an agent for CMV prophylaxis in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell recipients, but initial phase III trials failed to meet clinical efficacy endpoints. It has been more recently studied as a therapeutic agent at higher doses for refractory-resistant (R-R) CMV infections with favorable outcomes. After an overview of maribavir's chemistry and clinical pharmacology, this review will summarize clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and resistance data associated with maribavir therapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin Z, Sun J, Yang Y, Xu N, Jiang L, Fan Z, Huang F, Shi P, Wang Z, Xuan L, Xu J, Liu Q, Yu G. Cidofovir, a choice for salvage treatment of CMV infection in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 24:e13776. [PMID: 34941004 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cidofovir (CDV) is a nucleotide analogue with broad antiviral activities. It remains unclear about the CDV administration for anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this study, 31 out of 101 haplo-HSCT recipients suffered CMV infection in the CT group (conventional treatment) were enrolled into the CDV-ST group (CDV-second-line treatment). These patients were treated with CDV as they failed conventional treatment or they were unavailable to the preemptive antiviral therapy. Nine patients with CMV infection were enrolled into the CDV-FT group (CDV-frontline treatment) and received CDV preemptive therapy. RESULTS In the CDV-ST group, 23/28(82.1%) patients were observed treatment response with a median time of 9 (2-23) days, and 20 (71.8%) among these patients obtained complete response (CR). In the CDV-FT group, 6/8 (75.0%) patients acquired CR with a median of 6 (4-25) days. The treatment response in CDV-treated groups was comparable with those in CT groups. Besides, there was no statistical difference in CMV-related mortality between the three groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period (Median follow-up:10 (1-28) months), a total of 8/22 (36.4%) patients experienced CMV reactivation in the CDV-ST group, versus 23/62 (37.1%) in CT group (P>0.05). CDV-related toxicities occurred in 13/40 (32.5%) patients, including 6 (15%) reversible nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that CDV is potentially an option for the salvage treatment of CMV infection in the haplo-HSCT patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Yin
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Yang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Na Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Jiang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiping Fan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fen Huang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pengcheng Shi
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhixiang Wang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Xuan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qifa Liu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guopan Yu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avery RK, Alain S, Alexander BD, Blumberg EA, Chemaly RF, Cordonnier C, Duarte RF, Florescu DF, Kamar N, Kumar D, Maertens J, Marty FM, Papanicolaou GA, Silveira FP, Witzke O, Wu J, Sundberg AK, Fournier M. Maribavir for Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infections With or Without Resistance Post-Transplant: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 75:690-701. [PMID: 34864943 PMCID: PMC9464078 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapies for refractory cytomegalovirus infections (with or without resistance [R/R]) in transplant recipients are limited by toxicities. Maribavir has multimodal anti-cytomegalovirus activity through the inhibition of UL97 protein kinase. METHODS In this phase 3, open-label study, hematopoietic-cell and solid-organ transplant recipients with R/R cytomegalovirus were randomized 2:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) for 8 weeks, with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was confirmed cytomegalovirus clearance at end of week 8. The key secondary endpoint was achievement of cytomegalovirus clearance and symptom control at end of week 8, maintained through week 16. RESULTS 352 patients were randomized (235 maribavir; 117 IAT). Significantly more patients in the maribavir versus IAT group achieved the primary endpoint (55.7% vs 23.9%; adjusted difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 32.8% [22.80-42.74]; P < .001) and key secondary endpoint (18.7% vs 10.3%; adjusted difference [95% CI]: 9.5% [2.02-16.88]; P = .01). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between groups (maribavir, 97.4%; IAT, 91.4%). Maribavir was associated with less acute kidney injury versus foscarnet (8.5% vs 21.3%) and neutropenia versus valganciclovir/ganciclovir (9.4% vs 33.9%). Fewer patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs with maribavir (13.2%) than IAT (31.9%). One patient per group had fatal treatment-related TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS Maribavir was superior to IAT for cytomegalovirus viremia clearance and viremia clearance plus symptom control maintained post-therapy in transplant recipients with R/R cytomegalovirus. Maribavir had fewer treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs than IAT. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02931539 (SOLSTICE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin K Avery
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sophie Alain
- Department of Virology and National Reference Center for Herpesviruses, Limoges University Hospital, UMR Inserm 1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Barbara D Alexander
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily A Blumberg
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roy F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Catherine Cordonnier
- Haematology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital and University Paris-Est-Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Rafael F Duarte
- Department of Haematology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana F Florescu
- Infectious Diseases Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INFINITY-Inserm U1291-CNRS U5051, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Johan Maertens
- Haematology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Genovefa A Papanicolaou
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fernanda P Silveira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Oliver Witzke
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jingyang Wu
- Biostatistics, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aimee K Sundberg
- Clinical Sciences, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martha Fournier
- Correspondence: M. Fournier, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421 ()
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Limaye AP, Babu TM, Boeckh M. Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020; 34:34/1/e00043-19. [PMID: 33115722 PMCID: PMC7920732 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00043-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajit P Limaye
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tara M Babu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Overlake Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington, USA
| | - Michael Boeckh
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mehta Steinke SA, Alfares M, Valsamakis A, Shoham S, Arav-Boger R, Lees L, Ostrander D, Forman MS, Shedeck A, Ambinder RF, Jones RJ, Avery RK. Outcomes of transplant recipients treated with cidofovir for resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infection. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 23:e13521. [PMID: 33220125 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of ganciclovir-resistant (GCV-R)/refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in blood/marrow transplant (BMT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains suboptimal. Cidofovir (CDV), a nucleotide analogue with anti-CMV activity, is nephrotoxic and oculotoxic. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of SOT and BMT patients with GCV-R/refractory CMV treated with CDV between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2017. DATA COLLECTED baseline demographics, CMV serostatus, clinical and virologic presentations and outcomes, UL97 and UL54 genotype mutations, drug toxicities, and cause of death. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS 16 patients received CDV for treatment of CMV: six BMT and 10 SOT. Seven (47%) of the patients had high-risk donor/recipient serostatus: six (60%) SOT were D+/R-; one (16.7%) BMT was D-/R+. Median time to CMV DNAemia was 131 days post-transplant (IQR, 37.5-230.3). Proven tissue invasive disease was present in three patients (18.8%). Twelve (75%) had genotype testing; 10 (83.3%) of those had antiviral resistance mutations. While on CDV, six (37.5%) developed nephrotoxicity, and four (25%) developed uveitis (two had both uveitis and nephrotoxicity). Eight (50%) had failure to clear CMV DNAemia despite CDV treatment. Eight (50%) of the patients died; median time to death, after initiation of CDV, was 33.5 days [IQR22-988]. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of good therapeutic alternatives, CDV is used in GCV-R/refractory CMV infection. However, it is associated with a substantial risk of toxicity and failure to clear CMV DNAemia, highlighting the need for development of newer and less toxic therapies. The high mortality in this group of patients underscores the severity of illness in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema A Mehta Steinke
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Pueblo Infectious Diseases, PLLC, Pueblo, CO, USA
| | - Mona Alfares
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexandra Valsamakis
- Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA, USA
| | - Shmuel Shoham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ravit Arav-Boger
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Laura Lees
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Darin Ostrander
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael S Forman
- Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Audra Shedeck
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Ambinder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard John Jones
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robin K Avery
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infections after hematopoietic cell transplantation: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2020; 32:565-574. [PMID: 31567572 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Refractory or resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are challenging complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Most refractory or resistant CMV infections are associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality. Prompt recognition of resistant or refractory CMV infections, understanding the resistance pathways, and the treatment options in HCT recipients are imperative. RECENT FINDINGS New definitions for refractory and resistant CMV infections in HCT recipients have been introduced for future clinical trials. Interestingly, refractory CMV infections are more commonly encountered in HCT recipients when compared with resistant CMV infections. CMV terminase complex mutations in UL56, UL89, and UL51 could be associated with letermovir resistance; specific mutations in UL56 are the most commonly encountered in clinical practice. Finally, brincidofovir, maribavir, letermovir, and CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell therapy expanded our treatment options for refractory or resistant CMV infections. SUMMARY Many advances have been made to optimize future clinical trials for management of refractory or resistant CMV infections, and to better understand new resistance mechanisms to novel drugs. New drugs or strategies with limited toxicities are needed to improve outcomes of difficult to treat CMV infections in HCT recipients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chemaly RF, Chou S, Einsele H, Griffiths P, Avery R, Razonable RR, Mullane KM, Kotton C, Lundgren J, Komatsu TE, Lischka P, Josephson F, Douglas CM, Umeh O, Miller V, Ljungman P. Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:1420-1426. [PMID: 30137245 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in preventive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. CMV infection may fail to respond to commercially available antiviral therapies, with or without demonstrating genotypic mutation(s) known to be associated with resistance to these therapies. This lack of response has been termed "resistant/refractory CMV" and is a key focus of clinical trials of some investigational antiviral agents. To provide consistent criteria for future clinical trials and outcomes research, the CMV Resistance Working Group of the CMV Drug Development Forum (consisting of scientists, clinicians, regulatory officials, and industry representatives from the United States, Canada, and Europe) has undertaken establishing standardized consensus definitions of "resistant" and "refractory" CMV. These definitions have emerged from the Working Group's review of the available virologic and clinical literature and will be subject to reassessment and modification based on results of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sunwen Chou
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, and Research and Development Service, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Paul Griffiths
- Institute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London Medical School, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Avery
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kathleen M Mullane
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois
| | - Camille Kotton
- Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Jens Lundgren
- Centre for Health and Infectious Disease Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Takashi E Komatsu
- Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Peter Lischka
- AiCuris Anti-infective Cures GmbH, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | | | - Obi Umeh
- Shire Global Clinical Development (Immunology Therapeutic Area), Lexington, Massachusetts
| | - Veronica Miller
- Forum for Collaborative Research, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Per Ljungman
- Department of Cellular Therapy and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital.,Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
The development and implementation of stewardship initiatives to optimize the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 41:1068-1074. [DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AbstractClassical stewardship efforts have targeted immunocompetent patients; however, appropriate use of antimicrobials in the immunocompromised host has become a target of interest. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common and significant complications after solid-organ transplant (SOT). The treatment of CMV requires a dual approach of antiviral drug therapy and reduction of immunosuppression for optimal outcomes. This dual approach to CMV management increases complexity and requires individualization of therapy to balance antiviral efficacy with the risk of allograft rejection. In this review, we focus on the development and implementation of CMV stewardship initiatives, as a component of antimicrobial stewardship in the immunocompromised host, to optimize the management of prevention and treatment of CMV in SOT recipients. These initiatives have the potential not only to improve judicious use of antivirals and prevent resistance but also to improve patient and graft survival given the interconnection between CMV infection and allograft function.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common infection after organ transplant. In addition to causing a viral syndrome and infection, it also increases the risk for complications in the organ transplant, along with higher overall morbidity and mortality. Prevention and ideal treatment of CMV is paramount for optimal outcomes, both for individuals as well as for transplant programs. New guidelines and novel therapies are changing the way we manage disease. RECENT FINDINGS Several new antiviral agents have emerged in recent times, including letermovir, maribavir, and brincidofovir, enhancing our ability to prevent and treat CMV. Recent data on novel agents will be reviewed, with an emphasis on recent guidelines and best practices. SUMMARY Optimal treatment, influenced by recent advances in the field, including management of resistant virus, results in better outcomes with this significant and virulent virus.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yin Z, Yu GP, Xu N, Jiang L, Huang F, Fan ZP, Wang ZX, Xuan L, Liu QF, Sun J. [Clinical observation of cidofovir in salvage therapy for cytomegalovirus infection in patients with haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]. ZHONGHUA XUE YE XUE ZA ZHI = ZHONGHUA XUEYEXUE ZAZHI 2020; 41:326-330. [PMID: 32447939 PMCID: PMC7364930 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Z Yin
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - G P Yu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - N Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - L Jiang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - F Huang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Z P Fan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Z X Wang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - L Xuan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Q F Liu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - J Sun
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mullane KM. Human Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis and Treatment in Lung Transplantation in the Current Era. CURRENT PULMONOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s13665-020-00246-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Amini L, Vollmer T, Wendering DJ, Jurisch A, Landwehr-Kenzel S, Otto NM, Jürchott K, Volk HD, Reinke P, Schmueck-Henneresse M. Comprehensive Characterization of a Next-Generation Antiviral T-Cell Product and Feasibility for Application in Immunosuppressed Transplant Patients. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1148. [PMID: 31191530 PMCID: PMC6546853 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Viral infections have a major impact on morbidity and mortality of immunosuppressed solid organ transplant (SOT) patients because of missing or failure of adequate pharmacologic antiviral treatment. Adoptive antiviral T-cell therapy (AVTT), regenerating disturbed endogenous T-cell immunity, emerged as an attractive alternative approach to combat severe viral complications in immunocompromised patients. AVTT is successful in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation where T-cell products (TCPs) are manufactured from healthy donors. In contrast, in the SOT setting TCPs are derived from/applied back to immunosuppressed patients. We and others demonstrated feasibility of TCP generation from SOT patients and first clinical proof-of-concept trials revealing promising data. However, the initial efficacy is frequently lost long-term, because of limited survival of transferred short-lived T-cells indicating a need for next-generation TCPs. Our recent data suggest that Rapamycin treatment during TCP manufacture, conferring partial inhibition of mTOR, might improve its composition. The aim of this study was to confirm these promising observations in a setting closer to clinical challenges and to deeply characterize the next-generation TCPs. Using cytomegalovirus (CMV) as model, our next-generation Rapamycin-treated (Rapa-)TCP showed consistently increased proportions of CD4+ T-cells as well as CD4+ and CD8+ central-memory T-cells (TCM). In addition, Rapamycin sustained T-cell function despite withdrawal of Rapamycin, showed superior T-cell viability and resistance to apoptosis, stable metabolism upon activation, preferential expansion of TCM, partial conversion of other memory T-cell subsets to TCM and increased clonal diversity. On transcriptome level, we observed a gene expression profile denoting long-lived early memory T-cells with potent effector functions. Furthermore, we successfully applied the novel protocol for the generation of Rapa-TCPs to 19/19 SOT patients in a comparative study, irrespective of their history of CMV reactivation. Moreover, comparison of paired TCPs generated before/after transplantation did not reveal inferiority of the latter despite exposition to maintenance immunosuppression post-SOT. Our data imply that the Rapa-TCPs, exhibiting longevity and sustained T-cell memory, are a reasonable treatment option for SOT patients. Based on our success to manufacture Rapa-TCPs from SOT patients under maintenance immunosuppression, now, we seek ultimate clinical proof of efficacy in a clinical study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Amini
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Renal and Transplant Research Unit, Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tino Vollmer
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Desiree J Wendering
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Jurisch
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sybille Landwehr-Kenzel
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department for Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natalie Maureen Otto
- Renal and Transplant Research Unit, Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karsten Jürchott
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans-Dieter Volk
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Renal and Transplant Research Unit, Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Schmueck-Henneresse
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meesing A, Razonable RR. New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Transplantation. Drugs 2019; 78:1085-1103. [PMID: 29961185 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0943-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be one of the most important pathogens that universally affect solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Lack of effective CMV-specific immunity is the common factor that predisposes to the risk of CMV reactivation and clinical disease after transplantation. Antiviral drugs are the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease. Over the years, the CMV DNA polymerase inhibitor, ganciclovir (and valganciclovir), have served as the backbone for management, while foscarnet and cidofovir are reserved for the management of CMV infection that is refractory or resistant to ganciclovir treatment. In this review, we highlight the role of the newly approved drug, letermovir, a viral terminase inhibitor, for CMV prevention after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Advances in immunologic monitoring may allow for an individualized approach to management of CMV after transplantation. Specifically, the potential role of CMV-specific T-cell measurements in guiding the need for the treatment of asymptomatic CMV infection and the duration of treatment of CMV disease is discussed. The role of adoptive immunotherapy, using ex vivo-generated CMV-specific T cells, is highlighted. This article provides a review of novel drugs, tests, and strategies in optimizing our current approaches to prevention and treatment of CMV in transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atibordee Meesing
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Marian Hall 5, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Marian Hall 5, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2019; 102:900-931. [PMID: 29596116 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 708] [Impact Index Per Article: 141.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.
Collapse
|
20
|
Koval CE. Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2018; 32:581-597. [PMID: 30146024 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in prevention and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease remain an expected problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Because of the effect of immunosuppressing medications, CMV primary, secondary, and reactivated infection requires antiviral medications to prevent serious direct and indirect effects of the virus. Side effects and drug resistance, however, often limit the capacity of traditional antiviral therapies. This article updates the clinician on current and promising approaches to the management and control of CMV in the solid organ transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Koval
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Box G21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nukui M, O'Connor CM, Murphy EA. The Natural Flavonoid Compound Deguelin Inhibits HCMV Lytic Replication within Fibroblasts. Viruses 2018; 10:v10110614. [PMID: 30405048 PMCID: PMC6265796 DOI: 10.3390/v10110614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous herpesvirus for which there is no vaccine or cure. This viral infection, once acquired, is life-long, residing latently in hematopoietic cells. However, latently infected individuals with weakened immune systems often undergo HCMV reactivation, which can cause serious complications in immunosuppressed and immunocompromised patients. Current anti-viral therapies target late stages of viral replication, and are often met with therapeutic resistance, necessitating the development of novel therapeutics. In this current study, we identified a naturally-occurring flavonoid compound, deguelin, which inhibits HCMV lytic replication. Our findings reveal that nanomolar concentrations of deguelin significantly suppress the production of the infectious virus. Further, we show that deguelin inhibits the lytic cycle during the phase of the replication cycle consistent with early (E) gene and protein expression. Importantly, our data reveal that deguelin inhibits replication of a ganciclovir-resistant strain of HCMV. Together, our findings identify a novel, naturally occurring compound that may prove useful in the treatment of HCMV replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Nukui
- Genomic Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Christine M O'Connor
- Genomic Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Eain A Murphy
- FORGE Life Science, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, Doylestown, PA 18901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus: clinical implications of specific mutations. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2018; 23:388-394. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
23
|
Meesing A, Razonable RR. Pharmacologic and immunologic management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11:773-788. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1501557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Atibordee Meesing
- Division of Infectious Diseases and the William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MI, USA
| | - Raymund R. Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases and the William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Rolling KE, Jorgenson MR, Descourouez JL, Mandelbrot DA, Redfield RR, Smith JA. Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Abdominal Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Pharmacotherapy 2017; 37:1258-1271. [PMID: 28699311 DOI: 10.1002/phar.1987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (GR-CMV) is emerging as a significant infection in the abdominal transplant population. GR-CMV is difficult to manage, and treatment options are limited. We report a descriptive case series of 15 patients who had documented GR-CMV at our center and review the literature on treatment of GR-CMV. The first case in this series was detected in 2012; the majority of cases occurred after January 1, 2014, with approximately 50% occurring in 2015. UL97 and UL54 viral genome mutations were present in 100% and 40% of CMV-infected patients, respectively. GR-CMV infection occurred ≤ 1 year posttransplantation in 11 patients (73%). All patients experienced dose reduction of valganciclovir (the oral prodrug of ganciclovir) before the development of GR-CMV. Initial treatment for GR-CMV included a variety of regimens, all including reduction in maintenance immunosuppression. Of the 6 patients with detectable GR-CMV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) who were discharged without GR-CMV treatment and had a length of stay (LOS) less than 14 days, 83% were subsequently readmitted for treatment of GR-CMV within 2 months (60% in < 20 days); none received leflunomide. Of six patients with a LOS ≥ 14 days, 80% had CMV PCR below quantification on hospital discharge, and only one patient was readmitted in less than 20 days; 83% received leflunomide. Following GR-CMV, there was a 50% rejection incidence, 27% graft loss, and 20% mortality. For patients with more than three admissions for GR-CMV treatment, 100% had a major complication: 60% rejection, 20% graft loss, and 40% mortality. Common clinical characteristics of patients with GR-CMV included high-risk serostatus, lymphocyte depletion, and history of valganciclovir dose reduction. Overall, outcomes were poor. It appears that hospital readmission rate was reduced when CMV was treated to negativity with an initial treatment regimen of reduced immunosuppression, foscarnet, intravenous immunoglobulins, and leflunomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jillian L Descourouez
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Robert R Redfield
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jeannina A Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Almaghrabi RS, Omrani AS, Memish ZA. Cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients. Expert Rev Respir Med 2017; 11:377-383. [PMID: 28388307 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1317596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. Lung transplant recipients are particularly at risk given the intense immunosuppression required. Areas covered: The Detailed review of the literature related to CMV infection, its direct and indirect effect on lung allograft function, as well as diagnosis, immune monitoring, treatment options and prevention strategies. Expert commentary: In lung transplant recipients, CMV infection is associated with pro-inflammatory and immune inhibitory effects that increase the risk of graft dysfunction and loss. Diagnosis of CMV infection remains challenging. Treatment options remain relatively limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem S Almaghrabi
- a Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali S Omrani
- a Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Ziad A Memish
- b Director Research Department , Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia.,c College of Medicine, Alfaisal University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia.,d Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , USA
| |
Collapse
|