1
|
Chang SY, Kang DH, Cho SK. Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Asian Spine J 2024; 18:444-457. [PMID: 38146053 PMCID: PMC11222887 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This review comprehensively examines the evolution and current state of interbody cage technology for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). This review highlights the biomechanical and clinical implications of the transition from traditional static cage designs to advanced expandable variants for spinal surgery. The review begins by exploring the early developments in cage materials, highlighting the roles of titanium and polyetheretherketone in the advancement of LIF techniques. This review also discusses the strengths and limitations of these materials, leading to innovations in surface modifications and the introduction of novel materials, such as tantalum, as alternative materials. Advancements in three-dimensional printing and surface modification technologies form a significant part of this review, emphasizing the role of these technologies in enhancing the biomechanical compatibility and osseointegration of interbody cages. In addition, this review explores the increase in biodegradable and composite materials such as polylactic acid and polycaprolactone, addressing their potential to mitigate long-term implant-related complications. A critical evaluation of static and expandable cages is presented, including their respective clinical and radiological outcomes. While static cages have been a mainstay of LIF, expandable cages are noted for their adaptability to the patient's anatomy, reducing complications such as cage subsidence. However, this review highlights the ongoing debate and the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the superiority of either cage type in terms of clinical outcomes. Finally, this review proposes future directions for cage technology, focusing on the integration of bioactive substances and multifunctional coatings and the development of patient-specific implants. These advancements aim to further enhance the efficacy, safety, and personalized approach of spinal fusion surgeries. Moreover, this review offers a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of cage technology in LIF and provides insights into current practices and future possibilities in spinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Yeol Chang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Dong-Ho Kang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Samuel K. Cho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alini M, Diwan AD, Erwin WM, Little CB, Melrose J. An update on animal models of intervertebral disc degeneration and low back pain: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to improve research analysis and development of prospective therapeutics. JOR Spine 2023; 6:e1230. [PMID: 36994457 PMCID: PMC10041392 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Animal models have been invaluable in the identification of molecular events occurring in and contributing to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and important therapeutic targets have been identified. Some outstanding animal models (murine, ovine, chondrodystrophoid canine) have been identified with their own strengths and weaknesses. The llama/alpaca, horse and kangaroo have emerged as new large species for IVD studies, and only time will tell if they will surpass the utility of existing models. The complexity of IVD degeneration poses difficulties in the selection of the most appropriate molecular target of many potential candidates, to focus on in the formulation of strategies to effect disc repair and regeneration. It may well be that many therapeutic objectives should be targeted simultaneously to effect a favorable outcome in human IVD degeneration. Use of animal models in isolation will not allow resolution of this complex issue and a paradigm shift and adoption of new methodologies is required to provide the next step forward in the determination of an effective repairative strategy for the IVD. AI has improved the accuracy and assessment of spinal imaging supporting clinical diagnostics and research efforts to better understand IVD degeneration and its treatment. Implementation of AI in the evaluation of histology data has improved the usefulness of a popular murine IVD model and could also be used in an ovine histopathological grading scheme that has been used to quantify degenerative IVD changes and stem cell mediated regeneration. These models are also attractive candidates for the evaluation of novel anti-oxidant compounds that counter inflammatory conditions in degenerate IVDs and promote IVD regeneration. Some of these compounds also have pain-relieving properties. AI has facilitated development of facial recognition pain assessment in animal IVD models offering the possibility of correlating the potential pain alleviating properties of some of these compounds with IVD regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashish D. Diwan
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. George & Sutherland Campus, Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - W. Mark Erwin
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of TorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Chirstopher B. Little
- Raymond Purves Bone and Joint Research LaboratoryKolling Institute, Sydney University Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Sydney Area Health District, Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James Melrose
- Raymond Purves Bone and Joint Research LaboratoryKolling Institute, Sydney University Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Sydney Area Health District, Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Graduate School of Biomedical EngineeringThe University of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laubach M, Kobbe P, Hutmacher DW. Biodegradable interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: Current concepts and future directions. Biomaterials 2022; 288:121699. [PMID: 35995620 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Lumbar fusion often remains the last treatment option for various acute and chronic spinal conditions, including infectious and degenerative diseases. Placement of a cage in the intervertebral space has become a routine clinical treatment for spinal fusion surgery to provide sufficient biomechanical stability, which is required to achieve bony ingrowth of the implant. Routinely used cages for clinical application are made of titanium (Ti) or polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Ti has been used since the 1980s; however, its shortcomings, such as impaired radiographical opacity and higher elastic modulus compared to bone, have led to the development of PEEK cages, which are associated with reduced stress shielding as well as no radiographical artefacts. Since PEEK is bioinert, its osteointegration capacity is limited, which in turn enhances fibrotic tissue formation and peri-implant infections. To address shortcomings of both of these biomaterials, interdisciplinary teams have developed biodegradable cages. Rooted in promising preclinical large animal studies, a hollow cylindrical cage (Hydrosorb™) made of 70:30 poly-l-lactide-co-d, l-lactide acid (PLDLLA) was clinically studied. However, reduced bony integration and unfavourable long-term clinical outcomes prohibited its routine clinical application. More recently, scaffold-guided bone regeneration (SGBR) with application of highly porous biodegradable constructs is emerging. Advancements in additive manufacturing technology now allow the cage designs that match requirements, such as stiffness of surrounding tissues, while providing long-term biomechanical stability. A favourable clinical outcome has been observed in the treatment of various bone defects, particularly for 3D-printed composite scaffolds made of medical-grade polycaprolactone (mPCL) in combination with a ceramic filler material. Therefore, advanced cage design made of mPCL and ceramic may also carry initial high spinal forces up to the time of bony fusion and subsequently resorb without clinical side effects. Furthermore, surface modification of implants is an effective approach to simultaneously reduce microbial infection and improve tissue integration. We present a design concept for a scaffold surface which result in osteoconductive and antimicrobial properties that have the potential to achieve higher rates of fusion and less clinical complications. In this review, we explore the preclinical and clinical studies which used bioresorbable cages. Furthermore, we critically discuss the need for a cutting-edge research program that includes comprehensive preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies to enable successful translation from bench to bedside. We develop such a conceptual framework by examining the state-of-the-art literature and posing the questions that will guide this field in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Laubach
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, 4000 Australia; Australian Research Council (ARC) Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing (M3D Innovation), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Kobbe
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, 4000 Australia; Australian Research Council (ARC) Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing (M3D Innovation), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; Max Planck Queensland Center for the Materials Science of Extracellular Matrices, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheng M, Janzekovic J, Mohseni M, Medeiros Savi F, McGovern J, Galloway G, Wong C, Saifzadeh S, Wagels M, Hutmacher DW. A Preclinical Animal Model for the Study of Scaffold-Guided Breast Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2021; 27:366-377. [PMID: 33906394 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2020.0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Scaffold-guided breast tissue engineering (SGBTE) has the potential to transform reconstructive breast surgery. Currently, there is a deficiency in clinically relevant animal models suitable for studying novel breast tissue engineering concepts. To date, only a small number of large animal studies have been conducted and characterization of these large animal models is poorly described in the literature. Addressing this gap in the literature, this publication comprehensively describes our original porcine model based on the current published literature and the experience gained from previous animal studies conducted by our research group. In a long-term experiment using our model, we investigated our SGBTE approach by implanting 60 additively manufactured bioresorbable scaffolds under the panniculus carnosus muscle along the flanks of 12 pigs over 12 months. Our model has the flexibility to compare multiple treatment modalities where we successfully investigated scaffolds filled with various treatments of immediate and delayed fat graft and augmentation with platelet rich plasma. No wound complications were observed using our animal model. We were able to grow clinically relevant volumes of soft tissue, which validates our model. Our preclinical large animal model is ideally suited to assess different scaffold or hydrogel-driven soft tissue regeneration strategies. Impact statement The ability to regenerate soft tissue through scaffold-guided tissue engineering concepts can transform breast reconstructive surgery. We describe an original preclinical large animal model to study controlled and reproducible scaffold-guided breast tissue engineering (SGBTE) concepts. This model features the flexibility to investigate multiple treatment conditions per animal, making it an efficient model. We have validated our model with a long-term experiment over 12 months, which exceeds other shorter published studies. Our SGBTE concept provides a more clinically relevant approach in terms of breast reconstruction. Future studies using this model will support the translation of SGBTE into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Cheng
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jan Janzekovic
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mina Mohseni
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Flavia Medeiros Savi
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jacqui McGovern
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Graham Galloway
- Imaging Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Clement Wong
- Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Siamak Saifzadeh
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Wagels
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Herston Biofabrication Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,ARC ITTC in Additive Biomanufacturing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sparks DS, Saifzadeh S, Savi FM, Dlaska CE, Berner A, Henkel J, Reichert JC, Wullschleger M, Ren J, Cipitria A, McGovern JA, Steck R, Wagels M, Woodruff MA, Schuetz MA, Hutmacher DW. A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction. Nat Protoc 2020; 15:877-924. [PMID: 32060491 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Critical-size bone defects, which require large-volume tissue reconstruction, remain a clinical challenge. Bone engineering has the potential to provide new treatment concepts, yet clinical translation requires anatomically and physiologically relevant preclinical models. The ovine critical-size long-bone defect model has been validated in numerous studies as a preclinical tool for evaluating both conventional and novel bone-engineering concepts. With sufficient training and experience in large-animal studies, it is a technically feasible procedure with a high level of reproducibility when appropriate preoperative and postoperative management protocols are followed. The model can be established by following a procedure that includes the following stages: (i) preoperative planning and preparation, (ii) the surgical approach, (iii) postoperative management, and (iv) postmortem analysis. Using this model, full results for peer-reviewed publication can be attained within 2 years. In this protocol, we comprehensively describe how to establish proficiency using the preclinical model for the evaluation of a range of bone defect reconstruction options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Sparks
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Plastic & Reconswrapping a sterile Coban wrap around the limb distallytructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,Southside Clinical Division, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Siamak Saifzadeh
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Medical Engineering Research Facility, Queensland UCoban wrap only comes non-sterile. Sterilize Coban wrap before use.niversity of Technology, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
| | - Flavia Medeiros Savi
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,ARC Centre for Additive Biomanufactthe mounting resin base cement. Use it only in a laboratory fume cabinet and withuring, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Constantin E Dlaska
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Arne Berner
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jan Henkel
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Johannes C Reichert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, König-Ludwig-Haus, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Wullschleger
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Griffith University, School of Medicine, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jiongyu Ren
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amaia Cipitria
- Department of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Jacqui A McGovern
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Roland Steck
- Medical Engineering Research Facility, Queensland UCoban wrap only comes non-sterile. Sterilize Coban wrap before use.niversity of Technology, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Wagels
- Department of Plastic & Reconswrapping a sterile Coban wrap around the limb distallytructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,Southside Clinical Division, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,Australian Centre for Complex Integrated Surgical Solutions (ACCISS), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Maria Ann Woodruff
- ARC Centre for Additive Biomanufactthe mounting resin base cement. Use it only in a laboratory fume cabinet and withuring, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Biofabrication and Tissue Morphology Group, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael A Schuetz
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia. .,ARC Centre for Additive Biomanufactthe mounting resin base cement. Use it only in a laboratory fume cabinet and withuring, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The synthesis and characterization of multiarm star-shaped graft copolymers of polycaprolactone and hyperbranched polyester. Eur Polym J 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Gupta A, Kukkar N, Sharif K, Main BJ, Albers CE, III SFEA. Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review. World J Orthop 2015; 6:449-456. [PMID: 26191491 PMCID: PMC4501930 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i6.449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone graft substitutes are widely used in the field of orthopedics and are extensively used to promote vertebral fusion. Fusion is the most common technique in spine surgery and is used to treat morbidities and relieve discomfort. Allograft and autograft bone substitutes are currently the most commonly used bone grafts to promote fusion. These approaches pose limitations and present complications to the patient. Numerous alternative bone graft substitutes are on the market or have been developed and proposed for application. These options have attempted to promote spine fusion by enhancing osteogenic properties. In this review, we reviewed biology of spine fusion and the current advances in biomedical materials and biological strategies for application in surgical spine fusion. Our findings illustrate that, while many bone graft substitutes perform well as bone graft extenders, only osteoinductive proteins (recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and osteogenic protein-1) provide evidence for use as both bone enhancers and bone substitutes for specific types of spinal fusion. Tissue engineered hydrogels, synthetic polymer composites and viral based gene therapy also holds the potential to be used for spine fusion in future, though warrants further investigation to be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gigliuto C, De Gregori M, Malafoglia V, Raffaeli W, Compagnone C, Visai L, Petrini P, Avanzini MA, Muscoli C, Viganò J, Calabrese F, Dominioni T, Allegri M, Cobianchi L. Pain assessment in animal models: do we need further studies? J Pain Res 2014; 7:227-36. [PMID: 24855386 PMCID: PMC4020878 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s59161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last two decades, animal models have become important tools in understanding and treating pain, and in predicting analgesic efficacy. Although rodent models retain a dominant role in the study of pain mechanisms, large animal models may predict human biology and pharmacology in certain pain conditions more accurately. Taking into consideration the anatomical and physiological characteristics common to man and pigs (median body size, digestive apparatus, number, size, distribution and communication of vessels in dermal skin, epidermal-dermal junctions, the immunoreactivity of peptide nerve fibers, distribution of nociceptive and non-nociceptive fiber classes, and changes in axonal excitability), swines seem to provide the most suitable animal model for pain assessment. Locomotor function, clinical signs, and measurements (respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, electromyography), behavior (bright/quiet, alert, responsive, depressed, unresponsive), plasma concentration of substance P and cortisol, vocalization, lameness, and axon reflex vasodilatation by laser Doppler imaging have been used to assess pain, but none of these evaluations have proved entirely satisfactory. It is necessary to identify new methods for evaluating pain in large animals (particularly pigs), because of their similarities to humans. This could lead to improved assessment of pain and improved analgesic treatment for both humans and laboratory animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Gigliuto
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - William Raffaeli
- ISAL Foundation, Institute for Research on Pain, Torre Pedrera, Rimini, Italy
| | - Christian Compagnone
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Livia Visai
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Center for Tissue Engineering (CIT), INSTM UdR of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy ; Department of Occupational Medicine, Ergonomy and Disability, Laboratory of Nanotechnology, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Veruno, Italy
| | - Paola Petrini
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica 'G Natta' and Unità di Ricerca Consorzio INSTM, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Avanzini
- Laboratory of Transplant Immunology/Cell Factory, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico "San Matteo", Pavia, Italy
| | - Carolina Muscoli
- Department of Health Science, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro and Centro del Farmaco, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Roma, Italy
| | - Jacopo Viganò
- University of Pavia, Department of Surgical, Clinical, Paediatric and Diagnostic Science, General Surgery 1, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- University of Pavia, Department of Surgical, Clinical, Paediatric and Diagnostic Science, General Surgery 1, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Tommaso Dominioni
- University of Pavia, Department of Surgical, Clinical, Paediatric and Diagnostic Science, General Surgery 1, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Massimo Allegri
- Pain Therapy Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia ; Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- University of Pavia, Department of Surgical, Clinical, Paediatric and Diagnostic Science, General Surgery 1, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yong MRNO, Saifzadeh S, Askin GN, Labrom RD, Hutmacher DW, Adam CJ. Biological performance of a polycaprolactone-based scaffold plus recombinant human morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in an ovine thoracic interbody fusion model. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2014; 23:650-7. [PMID: 24253932 PMCID: PMC3940801 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3085-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2013] [Revised: 10/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/26/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We develop a sheep thoracic spine interbody fusion model to study the suitability of polycaprolactone-based scaffold and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) as a bone graft substitute within the thoracic spine. The surgical approach is a mini-open thoracotomy with relevance to minimally invasive deformity correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. To date there are no studies examining the use of this biodegradable implant in combination with biologics in a sheep thoracic spine model. METHODS In the present study, six sheep underwent a 3-level (T6/7, T8/9 and T10/11) discectomy with randomly allocated implantation of a different graft substitute at each of the three levels: (a) calcium phosphate (CaP) coated polycaprolactone-based scaffold plus 0.54 μg rhBMP-2 (b) CaP-coated PCL-based scaffold alone or (c) autograft (mulched rib head). Fusion was assessed at 6 months post-surgery. RESULTS Computed Tomographic scanning demonstrated higher fusion grades in the rhBMP-2 plus PCL-based scaffold group in comparison with either PCL-based scaffold alone or autograft. These results were supported by histological evaluations of the respective groups. Biomechanical testing revealed significantly higher stiffness for the rhBMP-2 plus PCL-based scaffold group in all loading directions in comparison with the other two groups. CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrate that rhBMP-2 plus PCL-based scaffold is a viable bone graft substitute, providing an optimal environment for thoracic interbody spinal fusion in a large animal model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostyn R N O Yong
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Siamak Saifzadeh
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Geoffrey N Askin
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Robert D Labrom
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Clayton J Adam
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henkel J, Woodruff MA, Epari DR, Steck R, Glatt V, Dickinson IC, Choong PFM, Schuetz MA, Hutmacher DW. Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective. Bone Res 2013; 1:216-48. [PMID: 26273505 PMCID: PMC4472104 DOI: 10.4248/br201303002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 509] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of Bone Tissue Engineering in the field of Regenerative Medicine has been the topic of substantial research over the past two decades. Technological advances have improved orthopaedic implants and surgical techniques for bone reconstruction. However, improvements in surgical techniques to reconstruct bone have been limited by the paucity of autologous materials available and donor site morbidity. Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have provided attractive alternatives to bone grafting expanding the surgical options for restoring the form and function of injured bone. Specifically, novel bioactive (second generation) biomaterials have been developed that are characterised by controlled action and reaction to the host tissue environment, whilst exhibiting controlled chemical breakdown and resorption with an ultimate replacement by regenerating tissue. Future generations of biomaterials (third generation) are designed to be not only osteoconductive but also osteoinductive, i.e. to stimulate regeneration of host tissues by combining tissue engineering and in situ tissue regeneration methods with a focus on novel applications. These techniques will lead to novel possibilities for tissue regeneration and repair. At present, tissue engineered constructs that may find future use as bone grafts for complex skeletal defects, whether from post-traumatic, degenerative, neoplastic or congenital/developmental "origin" require osseous reconstruction to ensure structural and functional integrity. Engineering functional bone using combinations of cells, scaffolds and bioactive factors is a promising strategy and a particular feature for future development in the area of hybrid materials which are able to exhibit suitable biomimetic and mechanical properties. This review will discuss the state of the art in this field and what we can expect from future generations of bone regeneration concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Henkel
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Maria A Woodruff
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Devakara R Epari
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Roland Steck
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vaida Glatt
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian C Dickinson
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peter F M Choong
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital , Melbourne, Australia ; Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital , Melbourne, Australia ; Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael A Schuetz
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia ; Orthopaedic and Trauma Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane, Australia ; George W Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|