1
|
Asagbra OE, Burch A, Chivela FL. The association between information technology sophistication and patient portal use: A cross sectional study in Eastern North Carolina. Health Informatics J 2023; 29:14604582231154478. [PMID: 36708279 DOI: 10.1177/14604582231154478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Even with the extolled benefits of patient portals, there has been some challenges to ensuring patient portal use. This study examines if a patient's level of information technology (IT) sophistication, defined as the degree of use of diverse information technologies by an individual, is associated with their use of a patient portal. Patients previous experience and exposure to other similar technologies like desktop computer, laptop, internet, smart phone, or social media explains their willingness to use information technology for their health. Data on a cross-sectional survey of 565 individuals in Eastern NC was available for analysis. Multinomial regression analyses revealed that IT sophistication is important in determining whether patients will use a patient portal. It specifies that patients with low IT sophistication compared to those with high IT sophistication were more likely to have never activated their patient portals (RRR = 2.2155, p < 0.009), or to have activated but never used a patient portal (RRR = 3.5869, p < 0.010). The findings of this study should aid healthcare leaders as they strive to improve patient engagement. They should continue to promote the benefits of the patient portal and consider offering personalized support programs for patients with low IT sophistication.
Collapse
|
2
|
MacEwan SR, Sieck CJ, McAlearney AS. Geographic Location Impacts Patient Portal Use via Desktop and Mobile Devices. J Med Syst 2022; 46:97. [PMID: 36383266 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01881-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Disparities in patient portal use are impacted by individuals' access to technology and the internet as well as their skills and health behaviors. An individual's geographic location may impact these factors as well as contribute to their decision to use a portal, their choice of device to access the portal, and their use of portal functions. This study evaluated patient portal use by geographic location according to three comparators: proximity to the medical center offering the portal, urban/rural classification, and degree of digital distress. Patients residing farther from the medical center, in rural areas, or in areas of higher digital distress were less likely to be active portal users. Patients in areas of higher digital distress were more likely to use the mobile portal application instead of the desktop portal website alone. Users of the mobile portal application used portal functions more frequently, and being a mobile user had a greater impact on the use of some portal functions by patients residing in areas of higher digital distress. Mobile patient portal applications have the potential to increase portal use, but work is needed to ensure equitable internet access, to promote mobile patient portal applications, and to cultivate individuals' skills to use portals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R MacEwan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 700 Ackerman Road, Suite 4000, Columbus, OH, 43202, USA.
- The Center for Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Cynthia J Sieck
- The Center for Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Equity, Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Center for Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee DC, Gefen D. The Interplay of Trust and Subjective Norms in Telemedicine Adoption by a Minority Community at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia. DATA BASE FOR ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2022. [DOI: 10.1145/3571823.3571828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Telemedicine is not released into a social vacuum. In some communities - such as the underserved, low income, mostly minority community served by Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia (EMCP) - the social context presents the medical center with unique challenges centered on a strong community sense of historical discrimination. That context is manifested in people being less inclined to trust symbols of external authority and in their strong reliance on subjective norms. Analyzing 540 survey responses by EMCP emergency department (ED) patients shows that trust in the EMCP portal was the strongest predictor of its acceptance. Being an African American had no effect on portal acceptance compared to others in the community. Importantly, there was a negative interaction effect of subjective norms and trust on portal acceptance - meaning that increasing this trust can reduce the importance of subjective norms or, alternatively, that lower subjective norms may increase the importance of trust in determining acceptance. This moderation may have very practical implications for EMCP because, while it might be challenging for EMCP to change long established subjective norms, it is within their power to increase trust in the portal. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane C. Lee
- Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li X, Xie S, Ye Z, Ma S, Yu G. Investigating Patients' Continuance Intention Towards Conversational Agents in Outpatient Department: Cross-Sectional Field Survey (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e40681. [DOI: 10.2196/40681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
5
|
Acholonu RG, Raphael JL. The Influence of the Electronic Health Record on Achieving Equity and Eliminating Health Disparities for Children. Pediatr Ann 2022; 51:e112-e117. [PMID: 35293812 DOI: 10.3928/19382359-20220215-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The electronic health record (EHR) has been heralded as a transformative approach to modernizing health care and advancing health equity. Access to the EHR can facilitate shared clinical decision-making and improved communication with patients, families, and among health care providers. Recent legislative and regulatory efforts have been passed to increase the transparency as well as the initiatives to increase the meaningful use of the EHR. Yet despite these well-intended efforts, challenges to addressing health equity through the EHR persist. This article reviews three distinct challenges to addressing health equity related to the EHR. We discuss (1) both the implicit and explicit bias that exist in EHR documentation, (2) the gaps that remain between screening for social determinants of health and the effective inclusion and billing of that screening into the EHR, and (3) the disparities that exist with the use of patient portals. Addressing these three areas will enhance the opportunities to advance health equity through the use of the EHR and bring us one step closer to eliminating health disparities in pediatric health care. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(3):e112-e117.].
Collapse
|
6
|
Mukhopadhyay S, Basak R, Khairat S, Carney TJ. Revisiting Provider Role in Patient Use of Online Medical Records. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:1110-1119. [PMID: 34911125 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Provider encouragement for patient use of online medical record (OMR) systems is poorly understood. The study examines temporal trends and predictors of provider encouragement and the effects of encouragement on OMR use. METHODS Health Information National Trends Survey administered in 2017 and 2020 were used. Subjects were 18 to 75 years old with access to the Internet or smart devices. From 2017 and 2020, 2,558 and 3,058 subjects were included, respectively. RESULTS In 2020, 52.8% reported receiving provider encouragement within the last year for OMR use compared with 41.3% in 2017 (p < 0.001). For respondents with chronic diseases (such as diabetes, hypertension, heart, or lung diseases [CVMD]), encouragement increased from 45.5 to 57.2% (p < 0.001). Sociodemographic determinants and clinical attributes (e.g., provider office visits, cancer history, or CVMDs) significantly (p < 0.05) predicted encouragement. Among CVMD subjects, gender and visit frequency were significant predictors. OMR use within a year grew recently (73.3% in 2020 vs. 60.6% in 2017, p = 0.002) among CVMD subjects reporting encouragement. Provider encouragement was associated (p < 0.05) with secure communication and viewing results using OMRs controlling for other predictors in the overall cohort and among CVMD subjects. CONCLUSION Many respondents reported not receiving provider encouragement for OMR use. These subjects represent millions of U.S. adults, including those participating during the pandemic, with CVMDs or cancer history. Encouragement rates grew over time and was associated with demographic or disease attributes and with OMR use. Future research should assess the optimality of encouragement. Resources enabling provider encouragement should continue and help prevent disparity in health technology use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ramsankar Basak
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Saif Khairat
- Carolina Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Timothy J Carney
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Swoboda CM, DePuccio MJ, Fareed N, McAlearney AS, Walker DM. Patient Portals: Useful for Whom and for What? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:573-581. [PMID: 34233367 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who use patient portals may be more engaged and empowered in their care; however, differences in who accesses patient portals remain. The characteristics of who uses patient portals more frequently and who perceives them as useful may also differ, as well as which functions people use. OBJECTIVE We assessed the characteristics of patient portal users to examine who uses them more frequently and who perceives them as useful. In addition, we wanted to see if those who use them more frequently or perceive them to be more useful use different functions or more functions of patient portals. METHODS Pooled cross-sectional data from 2017 to 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were used. Ordinal regression models were developed to assess frequency of use and perceived usefulness by demographics, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between the use of 10 patient portal functions and frequency of use and perceived usefulness of patient portals. RESULTS The odds of using patient portals more frequently were higher among those with Bachelor's degrees, incomes between $35,000 and $75,000, and those with two or more chronic conditions. Respondents with three or more chronic conditions had higher odds of rating patient portals as useful. Those who used their patient portal 10 or more times in the past year had higher odds of using all functions except for viewing test results compared with those who used their patient portal one to two times per year. Those who rated patient portals as "very useful" had higher odds of using seven of the functions compared with those who rated them "not very"/"not at all useful." CONCLUSION It is important to continue to assess usefulness, frequency of use, and overall patient portal function use to identify opportunities to increase patient engagement with patient portals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Swoboda
- CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Matthew J DePuccio
- CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Naleef Fareed
- CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Daniel M Walker
- CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
MacEwan SR, Gaughan A, Hefner JL, McAlearney AS. Identifying the role of inpatient portals to support health literacy: Perspectives from patients and care team members. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:836-843. [PMID: 33071027 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health literacy is a fundamental contributor to an individual's ability to self-manage their health and appropriately use health care services. Tools that positively impact health literacy therefore have potential to improve health outcomes. Inpatient portals are a tool that provides patients an opportunity to cultivate health literacy skills during hospitalization. Our study investigated how inpatient portal use could impact attributes of health literacy. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 132 patients and 440 care team members to learn about patients' inpatient portal use. Interview transcripts were analyzed deductively and inductively to categorize data and understand emergent themes around health literacy. RESULTS Patients and care team members identified inpatient portal functions that they perceived to positively impact health literacy. These functions included providing patients access to health information, care plans, and educational materials, as well as enabling patient communication with their care team. CONCLUSION Recognizing the potential of inpatient portals to improve health literacy is critical to ensure they are implemented in ways that leverage this benefit for patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health care organizations should implement inpatient portals that include features that support health literacy and encourage patients to use these portals in ways that improve their health literacy skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R MacEwan
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| | - Alice Gaughan
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer L Hefner
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haldar S, Khelifi M, Mishra SR, Apodaca C, Beneteau E, Pollack AH, Pratt W. Designing Inpatient Portals to Support Patient Agency and Dynamic Hospital Experiences. AMIA ... ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS. AMIA SYMPOSIUM 2021; 2020:524-533. [PMID: 33936426 PMCID: PMC8075428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Inpatient portals could help patients engage in their hospital care, yet several design, usability, and adoption issues prevent this technology from fulfilling its potential. Despite patients having needs that extend beyond the scope of existing inpatient portals, we know less about how to design such portals that support them. To learn about effective designs, we created three mid-fidelity prototypes representing novel approaches for inpatient portal design. Then, we conducted interviews with 21 pediatric and adult inpatients to gather their feedback on these prototypes. Participants shared how the prototypes addressed the following needs: forming active partnerships, navigating relationships and power dynamics with clinicians, understanding complexity of care, contextualizing health information, increasing efficiency of communication, and preventing lost information. We discuss two key implications-supporting patients' agency and dynamic needs throughout their hospital care-for the future of inpatient portal designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shefali Haldar
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - Ari H Pollack
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sociodemographic Differences and Factors Affecting Patient Portal Utilization. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2020; 8:879-891. [PMID: 32839896 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-020-00846-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary function of the patient portal is to give patients greater access to their personal health information. Granting patients electronic access allows them to make well-informed health care decisions. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify sociodemographic differences in patient portal use and examine factors affecting patient portal utilization following the final stage of the Meaningful Use program which aimed to promote the use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology. RESEARCH DESIGN Survey data from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, cycles 1, 2, and 3 were analyzed. The sample included 8291 completed surveys. Multivariable logistic regression on a selected response for each surveyed question was used to assess the racial and ethnic difference after controlling for age, sex, income, and education. SUBJECTS Subjects included English and Spanish speaking adults in the USA. MEASURES Measures included assessment of patient portal use, patient portal access, understanding health information, usefulness of health records, and privacy and security. RESULTS After adjusting for age, sex, income, and education, there was a significant association between race/ethnicity and patient portal non-users responding, "no need to use online medical record" as the reason for not using the patient portal (P = 0.005). Among the portal users, there were significant associations between race/ethnicity and health care provider maintaining an EHR (P = 0.006), being offered access to their portal (P < 0.001), understanding health information in the portal (P = 0.004), finding the portal useful for health monitoring (P < 0.001), reporting concern about unauthorized access (P = 0.017), and keeping information from health care providers (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Race/ethnicity affects perceptions on the need for the patient portal, being offered access to a portal, and the reasons to access information online. Understanding the factors affecting patient portal use can inform future strategies aimed at increasing adoption.
Collapse
|
11
|
Walker DM, Gaughan A, Fareed N, Moffatt-Bruce S, McAlearney AS. Facilitating Organizational Change to Accommodate an Inpatient Portal. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10:898-908. [PMID: 31777056 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portals are becoming more commonly used in the hospital inpatient setting. While the potential benefits of inpatient portals are acknowledged, there is a need for research that examines the challenges of portal implementation and the development of best practice approaches for successful implementation. OBJECTIVE We conducted this study to improve our understanding of the impact of the implementation of an inpatient portal on care team members in the context of a large academic medical center. Our study focused on the perspectives of nursing care team members about the inpatient portal. METHODS We interviewed care team members (n = 437) in four phases throughout the 2 years following implementation of an inpatient portal to learn about their ongoing perspectives regarding the inpatient portal and its impact on the organization. RESULTS The perspectives of care team members demonstrated a change in acceptance of the inpatient portal over time in terms of buy-in, positive workflow changes, and acknowledged benefits of the portal for both care team members and patients. There were also changes over time in perspectives of the care team in regards to (1) challenges with new technology, (2) impact of the portal on workflow, and (3) buy-in. Six strategies were identified as important for implementation success: (1) convene a stakeholder group, (2) offer continual portal training, (3) encourage shared responsibility, (4) identify champions, (5) provide provisioning feedback, and (6) support patient use. CONCLUSION Inpatient portals are recognized as an important tool for both patients and care team members, but the implementation of such a technology can create challenges. Given the perspectives care team members had about the impact of the inpatient portal, our findings suggest implementation requires attention to organizational changes that are needed to accommodate the tool and the development of strategies that can address challenges associated with the portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Walker
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Alice Gaughan
- Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Naleef Fareed
- Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Susan Moffatt-Bruce
- Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.,Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|