Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study: Cataract Classifications Following Eye Screening

Detection of Posterior Segment Eye Disease in Rural Eye Camps in South India: A Nonrandomized Cluster Trial

PURPOSE

Rural screening camps in India historically have focused on detection of cataract and uncorrected refractive error. This study aimed to increase detection, referral, and follow-up for posterior segment diseases (PSDs) in rural eye camps using a novel technology-driven eye camp model.

DESIGN

A clustered nonrandomized trial in the catchment area of Aravind Eye Care System (AECS) Pondicherry, to compare 2 eye camp models: the traditional AECS eye camp model and the novel, technology-driven, eye camp model.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 40 to 75 years of age who attended free camps conducted by AECS Pondicherry. Those with corneal pathologic features were excluded because this precluded an adequate view of the posterior segment to screen for PSD.

METHODS

The clinical protocols in the 2 arms were standardized and the same study team was used in both study arms. The unit of allocation to the 2 study arms was at the level of the eye camp, rather than the level of the individual study participant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary study outcome was detection of suspected PSD (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, other PSDs). Secondary outcomes included: (1) the proportion of referred participants who underwent an examination at the base hospital and (2) the proportion with confirmed PSD on examination at the base hospital.

RESULTS

The study included 11 traditional and 18 novel eye camps with a total of 3048 participants (50% in each study arm). The mean age of all participants was 58.4 ± 9.1 years and 1434 participants (47%) were men. The proportion receiving a referral for PSD was significantly greater in the novel (8.3%) compared with the traditional (3.6%) eye camp (P < 0.001; risk ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.30-2.34). Among the 183 participants referred from the camps for PSD, 73 (39.9%) followed up for further evaluation at the base hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

In a resource-constrained setting, use of digital fundus photography in novel eye camps resulted in increased detection of and referral for PSD. Further research is needed to determine whether this intervention is cost effective and may contribute to prevention of avoidable blindness and visual impairment in South India. Further research also is needed to improve follow-up of patients referred from camps for suspicion of PSD.

Interventions to promote access to eyecare for non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

People who are distinct from the dominant ethnic group within a country can experience a variety of barriers to accessing eyecare services. We conducted a scoping review to map published interventions aimed at improving access to eyecare for non-Indigenous, non-dominant ethnic groups residing in high-income countries.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for studies that described an intervention to promote access to eyecare for the target population. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts followed by review of the full text of potentially relevant sources. For included studies, data extraction was carried out independently by two authors. Findings were summarised using a combination of descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We screened 5220 titles/abstracts, of which 82 reports describing 67 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the USA (90%), attempted to improve access for Black (48%) or Latinx (28%) communities at-risk for diabetic retinopathy (42%) and glaucoma (18%). Only 30% included the target population in the design of the intervention; those that did tended to be larger, collaborative initiatives, which addressed both patient and provider components of access. Forty-eight studies (72%) evaluated whether an intervention changed an outcome measure. Among these, attendance at a follow-up eye examination after screening was the most common (n=20/48, 42%), and directly supporting patients to overcome barriers to attendance was reported as the most effective approach. Building relationships between patients and providers, running coordinated, longitudinal initiatives and supporting reduction of root causes for inequity (education and economic) were key themes highlighted for success.

CONCLUSION

Although research evaluating interventions for non-dominant, non-Indigenous ethnic groups exist, key gaps remain. In particular, the paucity of relevant studies outside the USA needs to be addressed, and target communities need to be involved in the design and implementation of interventions more frequently.

Lessons Learned from Two Large Community-Based Glaucoma Screening Studies

Community-based screening programs have had limited success in preventing vision loss from glaucoma due to overall low prevalence of glaucoma, screening limitations, and barriers to follow-up appointments. This editorial highlights lessons learned from two large prospective trials: the Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study (PTGDFS) and the Screening To Prevent Glaucoma Study (SToPGS). While some lessons are specific to ophthalmology, many lessons are applicable to screening for asymptomatic diseases in underserved, vulnerable communities.

Teleophthalmology and its evolving role in a COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review

ABSTRACT Introduction: Teleophthalmology may assist the healthcare sector in adapting to limitations imposed on clinical practice by a viral pandemic. A scoping review is performed in this study to assess the current applications of teleophthalmology for its suitability to diagnose, monitor or manage ophthalmological conditions with accuracy. Methods: A search of PubMed was conducted for teleophthalmology-related articles published from 1 January 2018 to 4 May 2020. Only articles that focused on the use of teleophthalmology in terms of diagnosis and management, as well as its benefits and detriments, were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the included articles. Results: A total of 38 articles were assessed at the full-text level. There were 2 qualitative studies and 1 quantitative randomised controlled trial, while the majority were either quantitative descriptive studies (19, 50.0%) or quantitative non-randomised studies (16, 42.1%). Overall, 8 studies described reducing manpower requirements, 4 described reducing direct patient–doctor contact, 17 described storage of medical imaging and clinical data, and 9 described real-time teleconferencing. The MMAT analysis revealed limitations in appropriate sampling strategy in both quantitative non-randomised studies (9 of 16, 56.3%) and quantitative descriptive studies (9 of 19, 47.4%). Cost-effectiveness of teleophthalmology was not performed in any included study. Conclusion: This current review of the various aspects of teleophthalmology describes how it may potentially assist the healthcare sector to cope with the limitations imposed by a viral pandemic through technology. Further research is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the various strategies. Keywords: Artificial intelligence, health informatics, ophthalmology, teleconsultation, telemedicine

Hybrid Telehealth Medical Retina Clinic Due to Provider Exposure and Quarantine During COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective

To present our hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic service with intravitreal injections (IVI) treatment as a safe alternative to in-person visits and examination during COVID-19 pandemic disease.

Methods

Due to exposure to a COVID-19 positive retina fellow, our retina service, in quarantine, evaluated patients’ medical files and retinal scans using a telemedicine approach. A different protocol for patients coming for IVI during the COVID-19 pandemic was established for IVI administration.

Results

During the 14-day quarantine period (between March 18th and March 31st 2020), the hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic performed 523 IVI to 394 patients with a mean age ± SD 70.96 ± 14.4 years. IVI were administered for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in 50.5% of the cases (199 patients), diabetic macular edema in 21.3% (84 patients), retinal vein occlusion in 17.5% (69 patients), and 10.7% for other retinal pathologies (42 patients). No ocular or systemic complications were observed.

Conclusion

During disasters and pandemics, IVI can be provided safely using a hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic approach but only in the appropriate patient and health care system.