West Nile Virus: An Emerging Threat in Transplant Population

Susceptibility of solid organ transplant recipients to viral pathogens with zoonotic potential: A mini-review

A substantial number of zoonotic diseases are caused by viral pathogens, representing a significant menace to public health, particularly to susceptible populations, such as pregnant women, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Individuals who have undergone solid organ transplantation frequently experience immunosuppression, to prevent organ rejection, and, thus are more prone to opportunistic infections. Furthermore, the reactivation of dormant viruses can threaten transplant recipients and organ viability. This mini-review examines the up-to-date literature covering potential zoonotic and organ rejection-relevant viruses in solid organ transplant recipients. A comprehensive list of viruses with zoonotic potential is highlighted and the most important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transplantation are described. Moreover, this mini-review calls attention to complex multifactorial events predisposing viral coinfections and the need for continuous health surveillance and research to understand better viral pathogens' transmission and pathophysiology dynamics in transplanted individuals.

Concomitant Polyoma BK Virus and West Nile Virus in Renal Allografts

Surveillance of the renal allograft recipient is essential when monitoring renal function to detect the early onset of rejection and alter therapeutic treatments to treat acute rejection or other causes and improve long-term graft function. If renal function begins to deteriorate, a renal biopsy is often indicated to assess the Banff grade of potential rejection or other causes, especially in the setting of polyoma BK viral load elevation. Although BK infection in the allograft is asymptomatic, reactivation of the virus is known to be associated with the acceleration of pathologic change and a poor outcome in the allograft. BK reactivation in a transplant kidney is not uncommon, and determining inflammation related to the virus versus acute rejection is paramount for appropriate immunosuppressive therapy management. We identified a concomitant polyoma BK virus and West Nile Virus (WNV) infection in two renal transplant patients which, to our knowledge, has not previously been reported. However, other concomitant infections have been reported in renal allografts including BK virus and cytomegalovirus (CMV), CMV and hepatitis C (HCV), and HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As WNV has become endemic in many regions of the United States, and since the transmission of the virus via transplanted organs is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it may be prudent to consider serologic screening for WNV in living donors prior to organ procurement. Regardless, the observation we made and report here should underscore the potential for concomitant viral infections that may be masked when a renal allograft has a significant inflammatory response to BK virus.

Prevention of infection and optimizing vaccination in the solid organ transplant candidate and recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections can result in serious complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. The need to remain up to date on recommendations on screening, vaccinations, and chemoprophylaxis is paramount in the management of SOT patients. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of current recommendations for the prevention of infections and optimization of vaccinations from the pretransplant through posttransplant periods.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an emphasis on thorough pretransplant evaluation to guide clinicians and pretransplant testing based on epidemiological and endemic risk factors. Additionally, recent studies on vaccine safety and efficacy of newer vaccine formulations in SOT recipients are addressed.

SUMMARY

This review provides insight on updated recommendations for pretransplant screening, new data on vaccine optimization in SOT recipients and posttransplant prophylaxis. Further research is needed in order to improve preventive measures including screening tests, vaccines, and chemoprophylaxis.

Emerging Trends in the West Nile Virus Epidemiology in Croatia in the 'One Health' Context, 2011-2020

West Nile virus (WNV) is one of the most widely distributed (re-)emerging arboviruses. In Croatia, acute WNV infections as well as seropositivity were detected in humans, horses, birds and poultry. Although serologic evidence of WNV human infections dates back to the 1970s, no clinical cases were reported until 2012. WNV outbreaks, as well as sporadic infections, were continuously recorded in continental Croatian counties from 2012 to 2018. In addition, acute asymptomatic infections (IgM antibodies) in horses have been regularly notified in continental regions since 2012, while seropositive horses (seroprevalence rates 3.7–21.4%) were detected in both continental and coastal regions. Moreover, WNV seropositivity in poultry (1.8–22.9%) was reported from 2013 to 2020. During the largest WNV outbreak in 2018, WNV RNA was detected for the first time in two dead goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) from the same aviary in North-West Croatia, while WNV antibodies were found in one buzzard (Butteo butteo) from the same region. In addition, WNV RNA was detected in a dead blackbird (Turdus merula) at the Croatian littoral. The phylogenetic analysis of 11 strains detected in urine samples of patients with neuroinvasive disease and 1 strain detected in a goshawk showed circulation of WNV lineage 2. Thus far, WNV has not been detected in mosquitoes in Croatia.

Identifying risks for severity of neurological symptoms in Hungarian West Nile virus patients

BACKGROUND

West Nile virus (WNV) infections have become increasingly prevalent in certain European countries, including Hungary. Although most human infections do not cause severe symptoms, in approximately 1% of cases WNV infections can lead to severe WNV neuroinvasive disease (WNND) and death. The goal of our study was to assess the neurological status changes of WNV -infected patients admitted to inpatient care and to identify potential risk factors as underlying reasons for severe neurological outcome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 66 WNV-infected patients from four Hungarian medical centers. Patients' neurological status at hospital admission and at two follow-up intervals (1st follow-up, within 60-90 days and 2nd follow-up, within 150-180 days, after hospital discharge) were assessed. All of the 66 patients in the initial sample had some type of neurological symptoms and 56 patients were diagnosed with WNND. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the West Nile Virus Neurological Index (WNV-N Index), a scoring system designed for the purpose of this study, were used for neurological status assessment. Patients were dichotomized into two categories, "moderately severe" and "severe" based on their neurological status. Descriptive analysis for sample description, stratified analysis for calculation of odds ratio (OR) and logistic regression for continuous input variables, were performed.

RESULTS

The average number of days between the onset of neurological symptoms and hospital admission (the neurological symptom interval) was 6.01 days. Complications during the hospital stay arose in almost a fifth of the patients (18.2%) and 5 patients died. Each day's increase in the neurological symptom interval significantly increased the risk for developing a severe neurological status following hospital admission (0.799-fold and 0.688-fold, based on the WNV-N Index and mRS, respectively). Patients' age, comorbidity, presence of complications and symptoms of malaise, and gait uncertainty were shown to be independent risk factors for severe neurological status.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely hospital admission of patients with neurological symptoms as well as risk assessment by clinicians - possibly with an optimal assessment tool for estimating neurological status- could improve the neurological outcome of WNV-infected patients.