Multimodality Imaging Approaches for Evaluating Traumatic Extremity Injuries: Implications for Military Medicine

The role of 3D cinematic rendering in the evaluation of upper extremity trauma

Traumatic upper extremity injuries are a common cause of emergency department visits, comprising between 10-30% of traumatic injury visits. Timely and accurate evaluation is important to prevent severe complications such as permanent deformities, ischemia, or even death. Computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) are the favored non-invasive imaging techniques for assessing upper extremity trauma, playing a crucial role in both the treatment planning and decision-making processes for such injuries. In CT postprocessing, a novel 3D rendering method, cinematic rendering (CR), employs sophisticated lighting models that simulate the interaction of multiple photons with the volumetric dataset. This technique produces images with realistic shadows and improved surface detail, surpassing the capabilities of volume rendering (VR) or maximal intensity projection (MIP). Considering the benefits of CR, we demonstrate its use and ability to achieve photorealistic anatomic visualization in a series of 11 cases where patients presented with traumatic upper extremity injuries, including bone, vascular, and skin/soft tissue injuries, adding to diagnostic confidence and intervention planning.

CTA Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Injuries

Traumatic vascular injuries consist of direct or indirect damage to arteries and/or veins and account for 3% of all traumatic injuries. Typical consequences are hemorrhage and ischemia. Vascular injuries of the extremities can occur isolated or in association with major trauma and other organ injuries. They account for 1-2% of patients admitted to emergency departments and for approximately 50% of all arterial injuries. Lower extremities are more frequently injured than upper ones in the adult population. The outcome of vascular injuries is strictly correlated to the environment and the time background. Treatment can be challenging, notably in polytrauma because of the dilemma of which injury should be prioritized, and treatment delay can cause disability or even death, especially for limb vascular injury. Our purposes are to discuss the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of vascular trauma and its optimized protocol to achieve a definitive diagnosis and to assess the radiological signs of vascular injuries and the possible pitfalls.

An Improved Multiexposure Image Fusion Technique

Multiexposure image fusion (MEF) is an effective approach to generate high dynamic range images from multilevel exposures taken from ordinary cameras. In this article, a novel MEF algorithm is proposed to gain maximum visual details as well as vivid colors from the captured scene. This algorithm first decomposes the input images with multiple exposures into the base and detail layer. The weights for the base and detail layers are computed by using exposedness function and then both the layers are combined to generate the final fused image. The proposed multiexposure technique requires fewer computational operations, preserves edges, and also reduces spatial artifacts. The proposed technique has been evaluated quantitatively using image quality assessment model based on structure similarity index measure for MEF. By the extensive experimental results, it has been illustrated that in addition to significantly outperforming other state-of-the-art techniques, the proposed technique is much faster and can achieve better image quality.

Reference Values for the Cross Sectional Area of Normal Tibial Nerve on High-resolution Ultrasonography

AIM

The aim of the study was to establish reference values for the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography and to investigate the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve and subject's age, gender, height (in cm), weight (in kg) and body mass index.

METHODS

Two hundred subjects of either gender and over 18 years of age with no history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the lower limb were evaluated with high-resolution ultrasonography. Mean cross-sectional areas of tibial nerves were measured at two different levels in both lower limbs, first at 1 cm below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into tibial and common peroneal nerves (level I) and the second at 1 cm superior and posterior to the medial malleolus (level II).

RESULTS

The mean cross-sectional area measured at level I (0.196 + 0.014 cm²) was larger than the one measured at level II (0.111 ± 0.011 cm²). A positive correlation was found between the mean cross-sectional area and height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05). Women had smaller cross-sectional areas of the tibial nerves than men at both sites. In addition, no significant relationship was found with the age of the subjects (p >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The established reference values of the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve will aid in early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy.

Reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal sciatic nerve using high-resolution ultrasonography

Aim

High-resolution ultrasonography is a new and promising technique to evaluate peripheral and spinal nerves. Its validity as a diagnostic tool in neurological diseases has been demonstrated in adults. The aims of study were to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal sciatic nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to determine the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the normal sciatic nerve and the subjects' age, gender, height (in cm), weight (in kg), and body mass index.

Material and methods

Two hundred subjects of both genders and above 18 years of age were studied with high-resolution ultrasonography. The subjects had no history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the lower limb. The cross-sectional areas of the normal sciatic nerves were obtained at two different levels in both lower limbs. The mean cross-sectional areas of the sciatic nerves were measured at two different levels, one located at 1 cm above the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into the tibial and common peroneal nerves, and the other 4 cm above the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into the tibial and common peroneal nerves.

Results

A positive correlation of the mean cross-sectional area was established with height, weight, and body mass index. Women had smaller cross-sectional areas of the normal sciatic nerves than men at both measuring sites. No significant relationship was established with the age of the subjects.

Conclusions

The established reference values of the cross-sectional area of the sciatic nerve can facilitate the analysis of pathological nerve conditions.

Feasibility and Reliability of an Ultrasound Examination to Diagnose Piriformis Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We explored the diagnostic performance of ultrasound examinations in the diagnosis of piriformis syndrome (PS).

METHODS

In our single-center retrospective study, 52 patients with a diagnosis of PS and 50 healthy volunteers were enrolled to undergo ultrasound examination of the piriformis and sciatic nerve. The thicknesses of the piriformis and the diameter of the sciatic nerve were measured to compare the differences between the patients with PS and healthy volunteers. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound examinations was assessed by constructing a receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve.

RESULTS

In patients with PS, the piriformis and sciatic nerve were enlarged on the abnormal side compared with the asymptomatic side, accompanied by a decreased echo intensity and an unclear perineurium. In addition, the piriformis thickness and sciatic nerve diameter of those with PS were significantly greater than were those of the healthy volunteers. The diagnostic performance of ultrasonography was significant. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for piriformis thickness and sciatic nerve diameter to discriminate between the abnormal and asymptomatic sides was 0.778 and 0.871, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound examinations can assist in the clinical diagnosis of PS and have the potential to be an alternative method for the diagnosis of PS for most musculoskeletal clinicians.

Ultrasonographic Reference Values for Assessing Normal Sciatic Nerve Ultrasonography in the Normal Population

Objective:

High-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) has been used recently to characterize median and ulnar nerves but is seldom used to characterize the lower extremity nerves. The reference standard for normal the lower extremity nerves has not been established. Thus, this study measured the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the sciatic nerve of 200 healthy male or female volunteers, aged 18–80 using HRUS. These data provide basic clinical data for the use of high-resolution ultrasound for the future diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies.

Methods:

Two hundred healthy volunteers with 400 lower extremities were studied with HRUS. According to their age, the subjects were assigned to young group (18-30 years, n = 75), middle group. (31-60 years, n = 70), and old group(61-80 year, n = 55). Age, sex, height, weight were recorded and CSAs of sciatic nerve were obtained at every predetermined sites.

Results:

The mean CSAs of sciatic nerves at GS and MGPF were 0.527 ± 0.028 cm² and 0.444 ± 0.026 cm² respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that the mean CSAs were correlated with height and weight. There was no difference in mean CSAs among the three groups (P > 0.05). Women had smaller CSAs of the normal Sciatic nerves than men in two measuring sites (GS, MGPF) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Peripheral nerve ultrasonography is a reliable and reproducible diagnostic method in the hands of experienced examiners. Normal values for the sciatic nerve nerves are provided by our study. Thus, reference values of Sciatic nerve CSA of the lower extremity can facilitate the analysis of abnormal nerve conditions.