Wounds and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in People Who Inject Drugs and the Utility of Syringe Service Programs in Their Management

How I manage severe bacterial infections in people who inject drugs

BACKGROUND

Injecting drug use is a risk factor for severe bacterial infection, but there is limited high-quality evidence to guide clinicians providing care to people who inject drugs. Management can be complicated by mistrust, stigma, and competing patient priorities.

OBJECTIVES

To review the management of severe infections in people who inject drugs, using an illustrative clinical scenario of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

SOURCES

The discussion is based on recent literature searches of relevant topics. Very few randomized clinical trials have focussed specifically on the management of severe bacterial infections among people who inject drugs. Most recommendations are, therefore, based on observational studies, extrapolation from other patient groups, and the experience and opinions of the authors.

CONTENT

We discuss evidence and options regarding the following management issues for severe bacterial infections among people who inject drugs: initial management of sepsis; indications for surgical management; assessment and management of substance dependence; approaches to antibiotic administration following clinical stability; opportunistic health promotion; and secondary prevention of bacterial infections. Throughout, we highlight the importance of harm reduction and strategies to optimize patient engagement in care through a patient-centred approach.

IMPLICATIONS

We advocate for a multi-disciplinary trauma-informed approach to the management of severe bacterial infection among people who inject drugs. We emphasize the need for pragmatic trials to inform management guidelines, including those that are co-designed with the community. In particular, research is needed to establish the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of inpatient intravenous antibiotics vs. early oral antibiotic switch, outpatient parenteral therapy, and long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics in this scenario.

Economic evaluation of the effect of needle and syringe programs on skin, soft tissue, and vascular infections in people who inject drugs: a microsimulation modelling approach

BACKGROUND

Needle and syringe programs (NSP) are effective harm-reduction strategies against HIV and hepatitis C. Although skin, soft tissue, and vascular infections (SSTVI) are the most common morbidities in people who inject drugs (PWID), the extent to which NSP are clinically and cost-effective in relation to SSTVI in PWID remains unclear. The objective of this study was to model the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of NSP with respect to treatment of SSTVI in PWID.

METHODS

We performed a model-based, economic evaluation comparing a scenario with NSP to a scenario without NSP. We developed a microsimulation model to generate two cohorts of 100,000 individuals corresponding to each NSP scenario and estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and cost (in 2022 Canadian dollars) over a 5-year time horizon (1.5% per annum for costs and outcomes). To assess the clinical effectiveness of NSP, we conducted survival analysis that accounted for the recurrent use of health care services for treating SSTVI and SSTVI mortality in the presence of competing risks.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with NSP was $70,278 per QALY, with incremental cost and QALY gains corresponding to $1207 and 0.017 QALY, respectively. Under the scenario with NSP, there were 788 fewer SSTVI deaths per 100,000 PWID, corresponding to 24% lower relative hazard of mortality from SSTVI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72-0.80). Health service utilization over the 5-year period remained lower under the scenario with NSP (outpatient: 66,511 vs. 86,879; emergency department: 9920 vs. 12,922; inpatient: 4282 vs. 5596). Relatedly, having NSP was associated with a modest reduction in the relative hazard of recurrent outpatient visits (HR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.95-0.97) for purulent SSTVI as well as outpatient (HR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.87-0.88) and emergency department visits (HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97-0.99) for non-purulent SSTVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the individuals and the healthcare system benefit from NSP through lower risk of SSTVI mortality and prevention of recurrent outpatient and emergency department visits to treat SSTVI. The microsimulation framework provides insights into clinical and economic implications of NSP, which can serve as valuable evidence that can aid decision-making in expansion of NSP services.

Empirical assessment of wounds among people who use substances

BACKGROUND

Wounds are a significant source of morbidity among people who use substances (PWUS). This project sought to identify the incidence and severity of wounds among PWUS in the South Bronx, a region of New York City with one of the highest morbidities of substance use disorder.

METHODS

This study recruited PWUS within the past 30 days. Research staff were trained to document the presence and severity of wounds. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of wounds. Acceptability of on-the-street wound care was assessed by the number of participants encountered. The association between participant characteristics and wounds was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 586 PWUS were assessed (19.4 % female: 69 % Hispanic; 23 % Black; 5 % White). Heroin (65.7 %) and psychostimulants (58.3 %) were the most commonly used drugs. Approximately 23 % of outreach recipients disclosed a wound. Among those with a wound, 60.9 % reported one wound, 27.8 % had two wounds, and 11.3 % had three or more wounds. Small wounds (approximately the size of a cherry) were the most common (78.6 %). Recent use of stimulants or heroin, along with intravenous use of any substance were significantly associated with having a wound.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that drug-related wounds were common among PWUS. Toxicology data from other sources indicate that xylazine was present in the NYC market at the time, though its prevalence among the current sample is difficult to determine. The occurrence and severity of substance-related wounds in NYC should continue to be monitored as a function of changes in the xylazine adulteration.

Water, sanitation and hygiene insecurity predict abscess incidence among people who inject drugs in a binational US-Mexico metropolitan area: A longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION

People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk of developing injection-related infections, including abscesses. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are key human rights and services; yet these services have been underexplored as predictors of abscesses among PWID.

METHODS

Longitudinal analysis was employed among a cohort of PWID to determine if WASH insecurity (lack of access) was associated with abscess incidence in the Tijuana, Mexico and San Diego, United States metropolitan area during 24-months of follow-up survey data from 2020 to 2023. We calculated abscess prevalence at baseline and tracked the incidence of new abscesses among individuals without an abscess during the previous visit. Time dependent Cox regression modeling was employed with variance clustered by participant to characterize the relationship between WASH insecurity and abscess incidence.

RESULTS

At baseline, hand hygiene insecurity, bathing insecurity in the previous six months and open defecation in the last week, were reported by 60 %, 54 % and 38 % of participants, respectively; 21 % reported an abscess in the last six months. The incidence of abscesses was 24.4 (95 %CI: 21.1-27.6) per 100 person-years. After adjusting for covariates, the hazard of developing an abscess remained significantly elevated among individuals using non-improved (with risk of contamination) water sources (e.g., surface water) for preparing drugs (adjusted HR [adjHR]: 1.49 [95 %CI: 1.01-2.21], experiencing bathing insecurity (adjHR: 1.59 [95 %CI: 1.12-2.24]) and open defecation (adjHR: 1.65 [95 %CI: 1.16-2.35]).

CONCLUSIONS

PWID in the Tijuana-San Diego metropolitan area reported facing high rates of insecurity accessing WASH services. Abscess incidence was higher (four to nine times) than observed rate among PWID cohorts in other settings. Access to continuously available toilet facilities, bathing infrastructure, and safe water sources for preparing drugs for injection could prevent abscesses among PWID. Accessible WASH infrastructure should be ensured among PWID communities and promoted as a key component of harm reduction infrastructure.

Water, sanitation, and hygiene access among people who inject drugs in Tijuana and San Diego in 2020-2021: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) access is critical to public health and human dignity. People who inject drugs (PWID) experience stigma and structural violence that may limit WASH access. Few studies have assessed WASH access, insecurity, and inequities among PWID. We describe WASH access, social and geographic inequalities, and factors associated with WASH insecurity among PWID in the Tijuana-San Diego metropolitan area.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional binational study, we interviewed PWID (age 18+) in 2020-2021 about WASH access and insecurity. City of residence (Tijuana/San Diego) and housing status were considered as independent variables to describe key WASH access outcomes and to assess as factors associated with WASH insecurity outcomes. Measures of association between outcomes and independent variables were assessed using log modified-Poisson regression models adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Of 586 PWID (202 Tijuana; 384 San Diego), 89% reported basic access to drinking water, 38% had basic hand hygiene, 28% basic sanitation, and 46% access to bathing, and 38% reported recent open defecation. Participants residing in Tijuana reported significantly higher insecurity in accessing basic drinking water (aRR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.02-2.76), basic hygiene (aRR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.28-1.64), and bathing (aRR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.06-1.39) than those living in San Diego. Participants experiencing unsheltered homelessness experienced significantly higher insecurity in accessing basic drinking water (aRR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.07-3.86), basic sanitation (aRR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.48, 1.92), bathing (aRR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.52-2.22), and improved water sources for cleaning wounds (aRR: 3.12, 95%CI: 1.55-6.29) and for preparing drugs (aRR: 2.58, 95%CI: 1.36-4.89) than participants living in permanent housing.

CONCLUSION

WASH access among PWID in the Tijuana-San Diego metropolitan area was low by international standards and lower than the national averages in both countries. Homelessness was significantly associated with WASH insecurity in this population. Concentrated efforts are needed to guarantee continuously available WASH services for PWID-especially those who are unsheltered.

Mucocutaneous Manifestations of Recreational Drug Use

Recreational drug use is increasingly common in the dermatology patient population and is often associated with both general and specific mucocutaneous manifestations. Signs of substance use disorder may include changes to general appearance, skin, and mucosal findings associated with particular routes of drug administration (injection, insufflation, or inhalation) or findings specific to a particular drug. In this review article, we provide an overview of the mucocutaneous manifestations of illicit drug use including cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, hallucinogens, marijuana, and common adulterants to facilitate the identification and improved care of these patients with the goal being to connect this patient population with appropriate resources for treatment.

Harm reduction in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Substance use increasingly contributes to early morbidity and mortality, which necessitates greater preparation of the healthcare workforce to mitigate its harm. The purpose of this systematic scoping review is to: 1) review published curricula on harm reduction for substance use implemented by undergraduate (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) in the United States and Canada, 2) develop a framework to describe a comprehensive approach to harm reduction medical education, and 3) propose additional content topics for future consideration.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, ERIC: Education Resources Information Center (Ovid), and MedEdPORTAL were searched. Studies included any English language curricula about harm reduction within UME or GME in the United States or Canada from 1993 until Nov 22, 2021. Two authors independently reviewed and screened records for data extraction. Data were analyzed on trainee population, curricula objectives, format, content, and evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles describing 19 distinct educational programs across the United States were included in the final sample, most of which created their own curricula (n = 17). Data on educational content were categorized by content and approach. Most programs (85%) focused on introductory substance use knowledge and skills without an understanding of harm reduction principles. Based on our synthesis of the educational content in these curricula, we iteratively developed a Harm Reduction Educational Spectrum (HRES) framework to describe curricula and identified 17 discrete content topics grouped into 6 themes based on their reliance on harm reduction principles.

CONCLUSIONS

Harm reduction is under-represented in published medical curricula. Because the drug supply market changes rapidly, the content of medical curricula may be quickly outmoded thus curricula that include foundational knowledge of harm reduction principles may be more enduring. Students should be grounded in harm reduction principles to develop the advanced skills necessary to reduce the physical harm associated with drugs while still simultaneously recognizing the possibility of patients' ongoing substance use. We present the Harm Reduction Educational Spectrum as a new framework to guide future healthcare workforce development and to ultimately provide the highest-quality care for patients who use drugs.

Community-Based Wound Care Programs for Unhoused Individuals

Wound care management for unhoused individuals is challenging due to the lack of healthcare infrastructure to handle the unique needs of this population. Therefore, we aimed to obtain insights for best practices and to establish a care clinic that is low threshold, community-based and meets the needs of unhoused people. We employed two approaches: (1) conduct a targeted narrative review of the literature of existing or proposed community-based program models that can address the wound care needs of unhoused individuals, and (2) assess cost-effectiveness and describe the results of a survey administered to unhoused clients and their health care providers at a community-based wound care program in Honolulu, Hawai'i. The literature search and screening yielded 11 articles relevant to the topic. Per the literature, existing community-based healthcare programs were successful when: (1) wound care services were incorporated into a broader social/health program, (2) cost-effective, and (3) comprehensive services were provided. Survey results in Honolulu found that the wound care program matched the needs of the targeted population and was cost-effective. Difficulty in following clients until wound closure and the sustainability of the program, particularly the lack of insurance reimbursement for street-based services, were perceived challenges. Additionally, the lack of insurance reimbursement for street-based wound care services continues to impact sustainability. Community-based programs can be successful in addressing the wound care needs of unhoused individuals if they address complex fundamental issues. This paper highlights existing gaps in logistics and policies that must be addressed to meet the specific medical needs of these vulnerable individuals.

Prevalence and incidence of emergency department presentations and hospital separations with injecting-related infections in a longitudinal cohort of people who inject drugs

People who inject drugs are at risk of acute bacterial and fungal injecting-related infections. There is evidence that incidence of hospitalizations for injecting-related infections are increasing in several countries, but little is known at an individual level. We aimed to examine injecting-related infections in a linked longitudinal cohort of people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia. A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence and incidence of injecting-related infections using administrative emergency department and hospital separation datasets linked to the SuperMIX cohort, from 2008 to 2018. Over the study period, 33% (95%CI: 31-36%) of participants presented to emergency department with any injecting-related infections and 27% (95%CI: 25-30%) were admitted to hospital. Of 1,044 emergency department presentations and 740 hospital separations, skin and soft tissue infections were most common, 88% and 76%, respectively. From 2008 to 2018, there was a substantial increase in emergency department presentations and hospital separations with any injecting-related infections, 48 to 135 per 1,000 person-years, and 18 to 102 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. The results emphasize that injecting-related infections are increasing, and that new models of care are needed to help prevent and facilitate early detection of superficial infection to avoid potentially life-threatening severe infections.

Xylazine in the drug supply: Emerging threats and lessons learned in areas with high levels of adulteration

BACKGROUND

Xylazine, a sedative analgesic drug approved as an animal tranquilizer but not for human use, has become an adulterant in the illicit opioid marketplace in North America. Recently declared an emerging health threat in the U.S., the prevalence of xylazine in overdose deaths increased 5.5-fold between 2019 and 2021. More information is needed about the impact of xylazine on opioid users and harm reduction service providers.

METHODS

The impact of xylazine adulteration was triangulated through examination of (1) opioid overdose fatalities in Connecticut between 2017 and 2021 reported by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner data, (2) a convenience survey of people in Connecticut who use drugs (PWUD) regarding their knowledge of and attitude about the local illicit drug supply, and (3) semi-structured interviews of harm reduction service providers in Connecticut and Philadelphia in response to prompts on the impacts of and responses to xylazine adulteration.

RESULTS

The presence of fentanyl or its analogues in fatal opioid overdoses was a statistically significant predictor of xylazine presence [OR = 25.0, 95%CI (10.7,81.1)] as was being Hispanic [OR = 1.36, 95%CI (1.03,1.77)]. A survey of people who used drugs revealed that 43% (n = 286) were concerned that the drug supply was always unpredictable. Three-quarters of respondents were aware of xylazine and two-thirds would use a xylazine test strip if one was available. Respondents who identified as White, Hispanic were most likely to be aware of xylazine, to have used a fentanyl test strip, and to be interested in a xylazine test strip. Respondents who injected drugs were 3.6-fold more likely than those who did not inject to endorse an interest in a xylazine test strip. Harm reduction service providers were cognizant of a range of problems surrounding the use and injection of xylazine. Although they reported implementing practices to better respond to xylazine harms, they recognized the absence of solutions to many of the problems encountered.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of xylazine has expanded, especially in combination with fentanyl. Harm reduction education efforts with fidelity to best practices have emerged, but the harms persist and community prevention needs are largely unmet.

Reducing the harms of xylazine: clinical approaches, research deficits, and public health context

OBJECTIVES

Xylazine has emerged as a consistent part of the unregulated drug supply in recent months. We discuss major domains of xylazine's harm, current knowledge deficits, clinical and harm reduction strategies for minimizing harm, and xylazine's public health and policy context. As an interdisciplinary team from across the USA, we have pooled our knowledge to provide an overview of xylazine's current and emerging contexts.

METHODS

To inform this essay, the pertinent literature was reviewed, clinical knowledge and protocols were shared by multiple clinicians with direct expertise, and policy and public health context were added by expert authors.

RESULTS

We describe xylazine's major harm domains-acute poisoning, extended sedation, and wounds, along with anemia and hyperglycemia, which have been reported anecdotally but lack as clear of a connection to xylazine. Current successful practices for xylazine wound care are detailed. Understanding xylazine's epidemiology will also require greater investment in drug checking and surveillance. Finally, approaches to community-based wound care are discussed, along with an orientation to the larger policy and public health context.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing the harms of xylazine requires interdisciplinary participation, investment in community-based harm reduction strategies, and improved drug supply surveillance. The relatively unique context of xylazine demands buy-in from public health professionals, harm reduction professionals, clinicians, basic science researchers, policymakers and more.

Assessment of Bacterial Infections and Antibiotic Regimens in Intravenous Drug Users

Bacterial infections in people who inject drugs (PWID) are a significant cause of hospitalizations and increased morbidity in this group. In this review, we evaluated bacterial trends in the most common infections and appropriate empiric antibiotic coverage. Articles from PubMed and Google Scholar were curated in a Google document with shared access. Discussion and development of the paper were achieved over Zoom meetings. The common infections in PWID were skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and bloodstream infections (BSIs). The presence of comorbidities increased susceptibility to bacterial infections. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant species in all the infections and included methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). The current standard of antibiotic use for Staphylococcus species was found to be sufficient. The gram-negative bacillus Serratia marcescens was prevalent in PWID as a causative agent of septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and infective endocarditis. Its treatment required a combination of β-lactam and either a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside for a prolonged duration. Streptococci were commonly implicated in SSTIs and BSIs. The appropriate response was seen with β-lactam antibiotics. In PWID, Enterococcus and Pseudomonas were implicated in infective endocarditis of native and prosthetic valves. The former being difficult to treat, a new strategy of using dual β-lactam antibiotics was found to be supported by clinical data. Anti-pseudomonal antibiotics can be avoided in other infections seen in this group, as their prevalence was low. PWID, especially those with comorbidities, have an increased risk of acquiring infections with difficult-to-treat microbes. Therefore, empiric antibiotic treatment should be relevant to the infection, for which bacterial trends and antibiotic susceptibility must be reassessed periodically.

Trends and correlates of abscess history among people who inject drugs in Massachusetts: A mixed methods exploration of experiences amidst a rapidly evolving drug supply

Background

Injection drug use poses significant risk for skin and soft tissue infections, such as abscesses. In places with endemic fentanyl and an increasingly contaminated drug supply, injecting and injection-related harms may be increasing, yet are understudied. We aimed to explore abscess prevalence, experiences, and themes among people who inject drugs (PWID) in the context of an evolving drug supply.

Methods

Between 2019 and 2022, we surveyed and interviewed Massachusetts- based PWID about current drug use behaviors and abscess experiences. Chi-square tests explored correlates of abscess history and trends for past-year abscess percentages over time. Transcribed interview data were analyzed to identify themes related to abscess risk and opportunities for intervention.

Results

Of the 297 PWID surveyed, 65.3% reported having an abscess at the injection site in their lifetime; 67.5% of these instances occurred within the last year. Reported past-year abscesses increased from 36.7% to 75.6% between 2019 and 2022. Correlates of past-year abscesses included frequent injection; methamphetamine, crack, or fentanyl use; and injection into the neck or calf. Methadone treatment was associated with significantly fewer recent abscesses. Interview data (n=151) confirmed the identified abscess risks, including syringe sharing and lack of hygienic supplies. Qualitative interviews provided additional data regarding healthcare provider stigma contributing to healthcare avoidance and the self-treatment of abscesses with adverse results.

Conclusions

Abscesses are an increasing concern among PWID residing in areas of high fentanyl prevalence and a contaminated drug supply. Community drug checking, overdose prevention sites, injection hygiene interventions, and improved access to care are indicated.

Assessing Reuse of Hypodermic Needles in Mice by means of Digital Imaging, Photomicrography, Bacterial Culture, Analysis of Nest Building, and Animal Vocalization

Hypodermic needles are sometimes reused in animal research settings to preserve the viability of and to conserve limited quantities of injected material. However, the reuse of needles is strongly discouraged in human medicine to prevent inju- ries and the spread of infectious disease. No official guidelines prohibit needle reuse in veterinary medicine, although the practice may be discouraged. We hypothesized that reused needles would be significantly more blunt than unused needles and that reuse for additional injections would cause more animal stress. To test these ideas, we evaluated mice that were injected subcutaneously in the flank or mammary fat pad to generate cell line xenograft and mouse allograft models. Needles were reused up to 20 times, based on an IACUC-approved protocol. A subset of reused needles was digitally imaged to determine needle dullness based on the area of deformation from the secondary bevel angle; this parameter was not different between new needles and needles that had been reused 20 times. In addition, the number of times a needle was reused was not significantly related to audible mouse vocalization during injection. Finally, nest building scores for mice that were injected with a needle used 0 through 5 times were similar to those of mice injected with a needle had been used 16 through 20 times. Among the 37 reused needles that were tested, 4 were positive for bacterial growth; the only organisms cultured were Staphylococcus spp. Contrary to our hypothesis, reusing needles for subcutaneous injections did not increase animal stress based on analysis of vocalization or nest building.

Community-acquired skin and soft-tissue infections in people who inject drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to discuss the latest evidence of the epidemiology, microbiology, risk factors, diagnosis and management of community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in people who inject drug (PWID).

RECENT FINDINGS

SSTIs are common complications in PWID and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Infections can range from uncomplicated cellulitis, to abscesses, deep tissue necrosis and necrotizing fasciitis. They are predominantly caused by Gram-positive pathogens in particular Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species; however, toxin-producing organisms such as Clostridium botulism or Clostridium tetani should be considered. The pathogenesis of SSTI in the setting of intravenous drug use (IDU) is different from non-IDU related SSTI, and management often requires surgical interventions in addition to adjunctive antibiotics. Harm reduction strategies and education about safe practices should be implemented to prevent morbidity and mortality as well as healthcare burden of SSTI in PWID.

SUMMARY

Prompt diagnosis and proper medical and surgical management of SSTI will improve outcomes in PWID.

Medical Complications of Injection Drug Use - Part I

Medical Complications of Injection Drug Use - Part IDuring the past 2 decades, the risk of death and the prevalence of hospitalizations in the United States have increased substantially among people who inject drugs, in large part because of the opioid epidemic. This article reviews the complications observed in people who inject drugs as well as strategies to reduce harm.

A wound care and immunization needs assessment for participants of a mobile syringe services program in Austin, TX

BACKGROUND

People who inject drugs (PWID) are subject to injection-related harm, including skin and soft tissue infections. Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide sterile syringes, disposal of used syringes, and other supportive services. Given their contact and credibility with PWID, SSPs could facilitate triage and treatment of wounds and access to immunizations for communicable diseases.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess wound care and immunization needs among participants accessing mobile SSP services in Austin, TX.

METHODS

A 21-item mixed-methods survey was created to assess frequency and severity of wounds, wound care approaches, and vaccination status. Participants were included if they reported injection drug use and experienced a related wound in the previous 6 months. Interview sections included screening, demographics, wound care, and immunization status.

RESULTS

A total of 21 participants completed the semistructured interview. A majority identified as male (n = 13, 61.9%), white (n = 12, 57.1%), and were unhoused (n = 12, 57.1%). The primary drug of injection was heroin alone (n = 14, 66.7%). Many avoided seeking wound care from health care providers (n = 16, 76.2%) owing to stigmatization (n = 13, 61.9%) and previous negative experiences (n = 7, 33.3%). Self-treatment of wounds included over-the-counter medications (n = 10, 47.6%), over-the-counter supplies (n = 10, 47.6%), and antibiotics (n = 9, 42.8%). In the past 5 years, few had received vaccination for hepatitis A and B (n = 3, 14.3%) or tetanus (n = 7, 33.3%), and many expressed interest in receiving vaccinations through the SSP. Interest for other expanded services included access to antibiotics, an on-site provider, wound care supplies, and education.

CONCLUSIONS

PWID may avoid professional health care for wound care or immunizations owing to perceived stigma. Expanding availability of wound care services and immunizations directly through mobile SSPs is desired by participants and could positively affect public health.

Harm Reduction: Not Dirty Words Any More

Although many of the tenets of harm reduction have been around for centuries and more traditional harm reduction services such as syringe services programs have been in existence for decades, there has been a recent increase in interest and acceptance of harm reduction as an essential component of a public health approach to substance use. This article provides an overview of harm reduction and its application to alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. It discusses the importance of integrating harm reduction principles and services with traditional psychiatric, medical, and addiction treatment programs.

The impact of opioid agonist treatment on hospitalisations for injecting-related diseases among an opioid dependent population: A retrospective data linkage study

BACKGROUND

Injecting-related bacterial and fungal infections cause substantial illness and disability among people who use illicit drugs. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) reduces injecting frequency and the transmission of blood borne viruses. We estimated the impact of OAT on hospitalisations for non-viral infections and examine trends in incidence over time.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data. The cohort included 47 163 individuals starting OAT between August 2001 and December 2017 in New South Wales, Australia, with 454 951 person-years of follow-up. The primary outcome was hospitalisation for an injecting-related disease. The primary exposure was OAT status (out of OAT, first four weeks of OAT, and OAT retention [i.e., more than four weeks in treatment]). Covariates included demographic characteristics, year of hospitalisation, and recent clinical treatment.

RESULTS

9122 participants (19.3%) had at least one hospitalisation for any injecting-related disease. Compared to time out of treatment, retention on OAT was associated with a reduced rate of injecting-related diseases (adjusted rate ratio[ARR]=0.92; 95%CI 0.87-0.97). The first four weeks of treatment was associated with an increased rate (ARR 1.53, 95%CI 1.38-1.70), which we believe is explained by referral pathways between hospital and community OAT services. The age-adjusted incidence rates of hospitalisations for any injecting-related disease increased from 34.8 (95% CI =30.2-40.0) per 1000 person-years in 2001 to 54.9 (95%CI=51.3-58.8) in 2017.

INTERPRETATION

Stable OAT is associated with reduced hospitalisations for injecting-related bacterial infections; however, OAT appears insufficient to prevent these harms as the rate of these infections is increasing in Australia.