Effect of intermittent cyclical disodium etidronate therapy on bone mineral density in men with vertebral fractures

Causes, consequences, and treatment of osteoporosis in men

Men undergo gradual bone loss with aging, resulting in fragile bones. It is estimated that one in five men will suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lifetime. The prognosis for men after a hip fracture is very grim. A major cause is reduction of free testosterone. Many other factors result in secondary osteoporosis, including treatment for other diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Patients should be screened not only for bone density but also assessed for their nutritional status, physical activity, and drug intake. Therapy should be chosen based on the type of osteoporosis. Available therapies include testosterone replacement, bisphosphonates, and nutritional supplementation with calcium, vitamin D, fatty acids, and isoflavones, as well as certain specific antibodies, like denosumab and odanacatib, and inhibitors of certain proteins.

Eleven years of experience with bisphosphonate plus alfacalcidol treatment in a man with osteogenesis imperfecta type I

We report the 11-year follow-up of a man with osteogenesis imperfecta type I who was treated with bisphosphonates and alfacalcidol. A 36-year-old Japanese man with osteogenesis imperfecta type I who had frequently experienced painful fragility fractures consulted our clinic because of chronic back pain. The patient had multiple morphometric vertebral fractures and a low bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. The patient was treated with cyclical etidronate 200 mg, for 2 weeks every 3 months, plus alfacalcidol 1 μg daily, for 2 years; and alendronate 5 mg daily or 35 mg weekly, plus alfacalcidol 1 μg daily for 9 years. After 11 years of treatment, BMD at the lumbar spine increased by 6.4%, following a 20.3% reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase. Serum calcium, phosphorus, and intact parathyroid hormone levels remained within the normal ranges. Three clinical fractures occurred at two ribs and the metacarpus, and two morphometric vertebral fractures occurred at the thoracic spine during the 11-year treatment period, but the patient experienced no adverse effects. Thus, the present case report shows the long-term outcome and safety of bisphosphonate plus alfacalcidol treatment in a man with osteogenesis imperfecta type I.

Etidronate: what is its place in treatment of primary osteoporosis and other demineralizing diseases today?

Bisphosphonate drugs are the major treatment options for primary and secondary osteoporosis and other demineralizing bone diseases. This class of drugs was presaged over a decade ago when etidronate disodium, the "mother compound" for modern-day bisphosphonates, was first used in the treatment of osteoporosis. The cyclic use of etidronate in therapy, which is known mainly to specialists in the field, is not approved in the United States. The drug does, however, have a worldwide reputation as a relatively inexpensive, efficacious, and highly tolerable treatment for osteoporosis. Many studies still describe its use for primary osteoporosis and some have described use in immobilization bone loss, periprosthetic bone loss, and even glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. This review highlights some of these uses.

Osteoporosis in the aging male: treatment options

In elderly women, loss in bone mass and micro-architectural changes are generally attributed to the onset of menopause. Men do not experience menopause, they do, however, experience age-related acceleration in bone loss and micro-architecture deterioration. The incidence of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men, just as in aged women, increases exponen-tially with age; the rise in men, however, is some 5-10 years later than in women. Up to 50% of male osteoporotics have no identifiable etiology; however elderly males have much higher likelihood of having an identifiable secondary cause than younger men. Therefore, clinical and laboratory evaluation of aged male osteoporotics must be thorough and should be aimed at identifying lifestyle or conditions contributing to bone loss and fragility. It is essential to identify and treat secondary causes and ensure adequate vitamin D and calcium intake before embarking upon treatment with pharmacological agents. The evidence from a limited number of trials suggests that bisphosphonates, especially alendronate and risedronate, are effective in improving BMD, and seem to be the treatments of choice in aged men with osteoporosis. In cases where bisphosphonates are contra-indicated or ineffective, teriparatide or alternatives such as strontium should be considered.

Pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis in men

Osteofragility fractures occur in men due to a compromise in bone strength, coupled with either trauma or a fall. In men >or= 65years of age, osteoporosis can be defined as bone mineral density (at the proximal femur, spine or distal forearm) of 2.5 standard deviations or less below the mean for a normal young adult man, using a male reference database (i.e., T-score value of <or=-2.5) [1,2]. In men 50 - 65 years of age, a similar definition is used if other risk factors for a fracture are present. Osteoporosis is increasingly recognised in men [3-11]. One in three men aged > 60 years will suffer an osteoporotic fracture [3]. Spinal fractures occur in 5% of men (compared with 16% of women) and hip fractures in 6% of men (compared with 18% of women) > 50 years of age [8]. The risk of hip fracture increases by approximately 2.6-fold for each standard deviation decrease in bone density measured at the hip [12,13]. At present, the life expectancy for men has increased to a mean age of 76.8 years. With men now living longer, they can be expected to develop multiple coexisting illnesses contributing to bone loss and an increased likelihood of falling and fragility fractures [5,14,15]. It is estimated that 30 - 60% of men presenting with spinal fractures have another illness contributing to their bone disease [4,6-10,16-20]. The ideal therapy for men with osteoporosis should include an intervention which significantly increases bone strength and reduces fracture rates, is safe, easy to administer and economical. This review outlines the current treatment strategies available for men with osteoporosis.

Effect of alendronate treatment on bone mineral density in male patients with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of alendronate therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip in men with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Medical records of male patients with osteoporosis, who had undergone follow-up in the Endocrinology Clinic at the National Naval Medical Center, were reviewed, and nine patients treated with alendronate for at least 1 year were identified. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had evidence of osteomalacia or if baseline and follow-up BMD results on the same dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) densitometer, at least 10 months apart, were not available. DEXA BMD results at the lumbar spine and hip, before and after at least 10 months of alendronate treatment, were analyzed for significant differences. Patients were also receiving calcium supplementation (1,000 to 1,500 mg/day), and all but one patient received vitamin D (400 to 800 U/day).

RESULTS

Lumbar spine BMD increased by 6.4 +/- 1.8% per year with alendronate treatment (P = 0.008). A mean absolute gain of 0.052 +/- 0.010 g/cm 2 (P = 0.005) in lumbar spine BMD was noted for the entire study group (N = 9), after a mean duration of treatment of 14 +/- 1 months. The mean lumbar spine BMD Z score improved by 0.40 +/- 0.09 (P = 0.002) with alendronate therapy. The femoral neck BMD also increased by 4.5 +/- 1.4% per year with alendronate treatment (P = 0.013). The mean absolute gain in femoral neck BMD was 0.028 +/- 0.009 g/cm 2 (P = 0.013) for the study group (N = 9) after 14 +/- 1 months of therapy. The mean femoral neck BMD Z score improved 0.30 +/- 0.08 (P = 0.005) with treatment. BMD gains at the greater trochanter of 3.2 +/- 1.5% per year (P = 0.067) and at Ward's triangle of 9.1 +/- 4.2% per year (P = 0.061) were not statistically significant. Two patients discontinued alendronate treatment after 1 year because of epigastric or retrosternal pain.

CONCLUSION

Oral alendronate treatment, given in combination with calcium supplementation and physiologic doses of vitamin D, resulted in significant improvements in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD after a 14-month period in this small group of men with osteoporosis. Although controlled, prospective trials involving larger numbers of male patients with fracture incidence data are needed before definitive conclusions can be made, alendronate treatment seems to be effective in improving BMD in men with osteoporosis, similar to its efficacy in women.

Randomized trial of etidronate plus calcium and vitamin D for treatment of low bone mineral density in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Crohn's disease causes an increase in osteopenia and osteoporosis. This study assessed the efficacy of adding etidronate to calcium and vitamin D supplementation for treatment of low bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four patients with Crohn's disease with decreased bone mineral density, determined by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, were randomly assigned to receive etidronate (400 mg orally) or not for 14 days; both groups were then given daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation for 76 days. This cycle was repeated 8 times during a period of 24 months. Biochemical characteristics and bone mineral densities were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

After 24 months bone mineral density significantly increased from baseline in both the etidronate- and the non-etidronate-treated groups (both groups receiving calcium and vitamin D supplementation) at the lumbar spine (P < .001), ultradistal radius (P < .001), and trochanter (P = .004) sites, but not at the total hip. The increase in bone mineral density was similar in each treatment group. No bone mineral density differences were found when groups were analyzed according to gender, corticosteroid use, bone mineral density at baseline, or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Low bone mineral density is frequently associated with Crohn's disease. Supplementation with daily calcium and vitamin D is associated with increases in bone mineral density. The addition of oral etidronate does not further enhance bone mineral density.

The effect of intranasal salmon calcitonin therapy on bone mineral density in idiopathic male osteoporosis without vertebral fractures--an open label study

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of intranasal salmon calcitonin therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) in idiopathic male osteoporosis without vertebral fractures. We conducted a randomized, open label, controlled trial in 71 male patients (mean age 59 +/- 6 years) suffering from idiopathic osteoporosis (femoral neck T-score < -2.5) without vertebral deformity. Patients in the control group (n = 31) received 400 IU Vitamin D + 1000 mg elemental calcium daily while the treatment group (n = 40) received 400 IU Vitamin D, 1000 mg elemental calcium plus 200 IU calcitonin nasal spray daily during alternate months. The study period was 18 months. Compared to controls, nasal calcitonin was associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (+3.5 +/- (-4.3%) vs. +0.83 +/- 6.4%, P = 0.04) and the femoral neck (+3.2 +/- 3.9% vs. +0.68 +/- 5.7%, P = 0.004). No significant difference was observed at the radius between the treatment groups (+1.4 +/- 8.8% vs. +1.4 +/- 10.9%, P = 0.98). Treatment was well tolerated with no premature discontinuations or significant side effects compared to the control group. We conclude that 200 IU salmon calcitonin nasal spray used daily, intermittently proved to be an effective and safe therapy in male idiopathic osteoporosis.

A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in men with idiopathic osteoporosis: effects on bone mineral density and bone markers

In a 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Twenty-eight men with idiopathic osteoporosis aged 27-74 years (mean, 52.4 years) were randomized to receive either nasal SCT (200 IU) or a nasal placebo daily for a period of 1 year. All the men received a daily supplement of 0.5 g of calcium. The men who received SCT had a mean (+/-SEM) increase in BMD of 7.1 +/- 1.7% at the lumbar spine. In contrast, the men who received the placebo had an increase of 2.4 +/- 1.5% (p > 0.05) for the comparison with baseline. The increase in lumbar BMD in the calcitonin group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the femoral neck, trochanter, or Ward's triangle relative to both baseline and placebo after 12 months. Treatment with nasal SCT resulted in a significantly pronounced suppression of bone resorption markers (urinary deoxypyridinoline [DPD], type I cross-linked N-telopeptide [NTX], and type I cross-linked C-telopeptide [CTX]) and to a lesser extent in bone formation markers (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BALP], osteocalcin [OC], serum C-terminal procollagen type I extension peptides [PICP], and serum N-termnal procollagen type I extension peptides [PINP]), whereas the placebo did not. Therapy was tolerated well and there were no treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT (200 IU daily) is safe and effective in increasing lumbar BMD and reducing bone turnover in men with idiopathic osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis in men

Osteoporosis is characterized by a reduction in bone density, associated with skeletal fragility and an increased risk of fracture after minimal trauma. Although osteoporosis is generally considered to be a condition affecting post-menopausal women, it is now clear that substantial bone loss occurs with advancing age in men, such that up to 20% of symptomatic vertebral fractures and 30% of hip fractures occur in men. This chapter highlights the incidence and prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in men and reviews the associated morbidity, excess mortality and health and social service expenditure. The determinants of peak bone mass and bone loss in men are discussed, as is the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and vertebral and hip fractures. The criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men are reviewed, together with the most appropriate investigations for secondary osteoporosis. The management of osteoporosis in men is also discussed, highlighting the most appropriate treatment options.

Bone turnover markers and sex hormones in men with idiopathic osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

In contrast to osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, osteoporosis in men has received much less attention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We determined various biochemical parameters of bone metabolism and sex hormones in 31 men with idiopathic osteoporosis and 35 age matched control subjects.

RESULTS

In the men with osteoporosis, a significantly increased urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (5.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.2 nmol mmol-1 creatinine; P = 0.033) in addition to increased serum levels of the c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (2677 +/- 230 vs. 2058 +/- 153 pmol; P = 0.037) were found. While parameters of bone formation were not significantly different in the patients and controls, serum bone sialoprotein levels were significantly decreased in the patients (3.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 12.4 +/- 4.0 ng mL-1; P = 0.021). Moreover, in men with idiopathic osteoporosis, lower levels of estradiol (91.3 +/- 5.8 vs. 114.6 +/- 7.8 pmol L-1; P = 0.044), higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin (31.5 +/- 3.1 vs. 24.2 +/- 1.4 nmol L-1; P = 0.034) and a decreased free androgen index (42.6 +/- 5.2 vs. 56.4 +/- 5.9; P = 0.016) were seen. Serum estradiol levels correlated negatively with several parameters of bone resorption.

CONCLUSIONS

In men with idiopathic osteoporosis, bone resorption is increased and exceeds bone formation. The excessive bone resorption seen in idiopathic male osteoporosis may be due to decreased estradiol levels and low levels of bioavailable testosterone.

Osteoporosis in men

Although less common than in women, osteoporosis in men is a prevalent worldwide problem with important socioeconomic implications. Our understanding of this condition in men is growing, but there remains a great deal more to be determined. Definitions for osteoporosis in men are needed. Cost-effective guidelines on who should be investigated and treated, and how, are clearly necessary. The role of bone mineral densitometry in diagnosis and treatment decisions needs to be clarified. The efficacy of drug therapies for osteoporosis in men requires greater attention. Currently, a large multicenter study is underway in the United States and should provide much needed insight into the epidemiology of osteoporosis in men.

Unresolved issues in osteoporosis in men

Fragility fractures in men are a public health problem. The increasing longevity in men is likely to increase the public health burden of fractures in men. This problem remains unrecognized by doctors, the public and governments. About one third of all hip fractures occur in men but the incidence and gender ratio varies from country to country for reasons that are not understood. The prevalence of spine fractures is about half that of women in most studies, but similar to that of women in several other studies. The incidence of spine fractures is uncertain but is likely to be about half that of women except in 80+ year olds, when it appears to be similar. The causes of the higher mortality in men than in women following hip or spine fracture are not well defined. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) predicts fracture risk in men; the relative risk for spine and hip fracture conferred by a 1 SD lower aBMD, or by a prevalent fracture, is similar in men and women. The age-specific absolute risk (number of cases per 1,000 per year) conferred by a given hip aBMD is similar in men and women. The age-specific absolute risk conferred by aBMD at the calcaneus or radius for spine fracture is similar for men and women. If the absolute and relative risks are similar then the lower incidence of fractures in men than women may reflect the lower proportion of the male population distribution below a given structural determinant of bone fragility. That is, at any age, there may be fewer men than women with smaller bones, lower volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), thinner trabeculae or cortices, architectural disruption, or higher remodeling rates. Higher mortality and fewer falls may also contribute to the lower incidence of fractures in men. This tail end of the male population distribution (for traits like bone size, vBMD, architecture, and remodeling rates) is the likely source of fracture cases in males. Hypogonadism is a risk factor for osteoporosis. However, the definition, prevalence, causes and structural consequence of hypogonadism are inadequately defined. At what level of testosterone is bone balance negative? What structural determinants of axial and appendicular strength are regulated by testosterone, estrogen, growth hormone (GH), insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (or their interactions)? Is reduced bone size in men with spine or hip fractures due to failed growth-related or age-related periosteal expansion? If reduced vBMD is due to reduced accrual, is this due to reduced cortical thickness? What factors regulate and coregulate the periosteal and endocortical modeling and remodeling? Are reduced trabecular numbers due to failed formation at the growth plate, excess resorption of primary trabeculae or reduced formation of secondary trabeculae? Is reduced trabecular thickness due to failed prepubertal or pubertal bone formation? Is reduced cortical and trabecular thickness during aging due to excessive endosteal resorption or reduced bone formation? If the former, is this due to increased remodeling sites or increased resorption depth? Most evidence favors reduced bone formation as the cause of bone loss with trabecular bone loss occurring by reduced formation and thinning more than by increased resorption and loss of connectivity. Cortical bone loss is less than in women because endocortical resorption is less and periosteal apposition is greater. If the reduced bone formation is most important, is this due to reduced osteoprogenitors, reduced osteoblast matrix synthesis or early osteoblast apoptosis? Anti-spine-fracture efficacy has been demonstrated in only one randomized heated with alendronate drug in men. The gaps in our knowledge remain large.

Etridronate therapy in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis

Etidronate disodium is an oral bisphosphonate compound known to reduce bone resorption through the inhibition of osteoclastic activity. This article is a review of its efficacy and safety in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. In general, studies of cyclical etidronate therapy (400 mg daily for 2 wk every 3 mo) have found a significant improvement in bone density. These studies have not been powered to study fracture incidence, but a reduced fracture rate has been found in some of the studies reviewed. Studies examining cyclical etidronate in the prevention of osteoporosis indicate it prevents early menopausal bone loss and is free of significant side effects. In both prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and treatment of patients who have been on long-term corticosteroid therapy, cyclical etidronate appears to increase bone density and prevent further loss of bone. In summary, a review of available literature pertaining to the use of etidronate in prevention and treatment of primary and secondary osteoporosis has been presented. This review suggests etidronate, used as a cyclical therapy, is a safe and effective therapy. The weight of evidence suggests it is capable of reducing fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. Increases in bone density at the spine and hip are not as pronounced as with some other bisphosphonates, particularly alendronate, but no direct clinical comparison trials of significant size or duration have been undertaken.

The structural basis of bone fragility in men

Understanding of the pathogenesis of bone fragility in men requires knowledge of its structural basis. There is no evidence that gender differences in fracture rates are explained by gender differences in bone mineral content (BMC) or areal bone mineral density (BMD). This is an untested assumption. The BMD measurement integrates the modeling and remodeling that occurs on the periosteal and endosteal surfaces of bone during growth and aging. The size, shape, and architecture of the bone so formed determine its breaking strength. None of these three-dimensional structural components is "seen" by the dual photons of the densitometer. Men and women attain a similar peak vertebral height during growth. Vertebral width is greater in men, conferring higher BMC and areal BMD, but trabecular number and thickness (trabecular volumetric BMD) is no greater in men than women. Blacks have shorter vertebra than whites, and vertebral width is similar. Trabecular thickness is greater in blacks than whites. Thus, at peak, gender differences in vertebral strength are likely to be size, not BMD, dependent. Racial differences in vertebral strength are likely to be BMD, not size, dependent. Greater periosteal expansion during growth in males than females, and blacks than whites, establishes the gender and racial differences in peak bone size. Men have wider long bones than women. Blacks have wider long bones than whites. The proximity of the endocortical surface to the periosteal surface determines peak cortical width, which is similar in men, women, blacks, and whites. It is the greater distance of the cortical mineral mass from the neutral axis of a long bone in males than in females, in blacks than in whites, and in men with, than men without, fractures, that partly accounts for the greater bone strength in the first mentioned in each group. Thus, at peak, racial and gender differences in long bone strength are likely to be size, not BMD dependent. Trabecular bone loss is similar in men and women. Loss of connectivity is greater in women. Endocortical resorption is greater in women than men, but men lose less cortical width because subperiosteal apposition during aging is greater in men than in women offsetting endocortical resorption. Men with spine fractures have smaller vertebrae because vertebral width is less. Men with hip fractures have smaller femoral neck width. In both types of fractures, there is less bone in the smaller bone-reduced volumetric BMD. The relative contributions of reduced accrual during growth, excessive bone loss during aging, or both to the deficit in volumetric BMD are undefined. No antifracture efficacy trials have been done in men. Reasonable approaches to treatment include the use of testosterone in hypogonadal men, and vitamin D if vitamin D deficiency is present. Calcium supplements may slow endocortical bone loss. Bisphosphonates may increase BMD.

Recurrence of vertebral fracture with cyclical etidronate therapy in osteoporosis: histomorphometry and X-Ray microanalysis evaluation

In an open prospective study, we evaluated differences between patients with (wRVF group) and without recurrence of vertebral fracture (woRVF group) during cyclical etidronate therapy for osteoporosis. Thirty-two patients (age 64 +/- 1.8 years) characterized by at least one osteoporotic VF were treated during 1 year. At baseline, body mass index was significantly lower (23.3 +/- 0.6 vs. 26.9 +/- 1.0 kg/m2, p< 0.05), the number of previous VFs was higher (4.0 +/- 0. 4 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4, NS), and patients were older in the wRVF group as compared with the woRVF group (67.8 +/- 3 vs. 62.6+/- 2.2 year, NS). Trabecular bone volume (11.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 15 +/- 0.9%, p< 0.05) and trabecular number (1.06 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.05, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in the wRVF group. None of the baseline resorptive variables differed, whereas the bone formation rate (BFR) was 2-fold lower in the wRVF group (p< 0. 05). After 1 year of treatment, osteoclast number, active eroded surfaces, and resorption depth dramatically decreased in both groups (p< 0. 01). To a lesser extent, the mineral apposition rate and serum alkaline phosphatase level were significantly reduced (p< 0.05). No impaired mineralization was observed. Using X-ray microanalysis, we found no abnormality in bone mineral but a significant increase of the calcium/phosphorus ratio during treatment in the wRVF group. Our results demonstrate that recurrence of VFs within the first year of cyclical etidronate therapy was related neither to a lack of histologic response to the treatment nor induction of an abnormality of mineralization. VFs were more likely in the presence of a decreased BFR and lower trabecular connectivity, providing support for treating osteoporotic patients with etidronate early in the course of the disease.

Osteoporosis in men. New insights into aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and management

Osteoporosis is increasingly recognised in men. Low bone mass, risk factors for falling and factors causing fractures in women are likely to cause fractures in men. Bone mass is largely genetically determined, but environmental factors also contribute. Greater muscle strength and physical activity are associated with higher bone mass, while radial bone loss is greater in cigarette smokers or those with a moderate alcohol intake. Sex hormones have important effects on bone physiology. In men, there is no abrupt cessation of testicular function or 'andropause' comparable with the menopause in women; however, both total and free testosterone levels decline with age. A common secondary cause of osteoporosis in men is hypogonadism. There is increasing evidence that estrogens are important in skeletal maintenance in men as well as women. Peripheral aromatisation of androgens to estrogens occurs and osteoblast-like cells can aromatise androgens into estrogens. Human models exist for the effects of estrogens on the male skeleton. In men aged > 65 years, there is a positive association between bone mineral density (BMD) and greater serum estradiol levels at all skeletal sites and a negative association between BMD and testosterone at some sites. It is crucial to exclude pathological causes of osteoporosis, because 30 to 60% of men with vertebral fractures have another illness contributing to bone disease. Glucocorticoid excess (predominantly exogenous) is common. Gastrointestinal disease predisposes patients to bone disease as a result of intestinal malabsorption of calcium and colecalciferol (vitamin D). Hypercalciuria and nephrolithiasis, anticonvulsant drug use, thyrotoxicosis, immobilisation, liver and renal disease, multiple myeloma and systemic mastocytosis have all been associated with osteoporosis in men. It is possible that low-dose estrogen therapy or specific estrogen receptor-modulating drugs might increase BMD in men as well as in women. In the future, parathyroid hormone peptides may be an effective treatment for osteoporosis, particularly in patients in whom other treatments, such as bisphosphonates, have failed. Men with idiopathic osteoporosis have low circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1; somatomedin-1) concentrations, and IGF-1 administration to these men increases bone formation markers more than resorption markers. Studies of changes in BMD with IGF-1 treatment in osteoporotic men and women are underway. Osteoporosis in men will become an increasing worldwide public health problem over the next 20 years, so it is vital that safe and effective therapies for this disabling condition become available. Effective public health measures also need to be established and targeted to men at risk of developing the disease.