Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic review

Characteristics and outcomes of inpatients aged 85 and older with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures: impact on hospital stay and mortality

BACKGROUND

There is a gap in evidence about medical outcomes in oldest-old patients (aged 85 and older) with vertebral fractures (VFs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient and fracture characteristics on "short-term" hospital outcomes.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥ 85 presenting an acute or subsequent VF at our single level I spine center between 2019 and 2021 requiring hospital treatment were included. The data collection was conducted retrospectively. The primary parameters of interest were length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Further outcome parameters were the occurrence of general (non-operative) complications and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. For statistical analysis, linear and binary logistic regression modeling were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients with an average age of 88.5 (range 85 to 99) met the inclusion criteria. Our patients were mostly female (68.6%) and moderately comorbid according to a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 2.9. 58.8% had diagnosed osteoporosis. Fracture morphologies represented as "Osteoporotic Fracture" (OF) classification types were of central importance for undergoing operative treatment (OP) (p < 0.001), necessity for intensive care (p = 0.023), LOS (p = 0.014), and mortality (p = 0.018). 38.6% had OP. We recorded a complication rate of 59.5%, which highly influenced (p < 0.001) both primary outcome parameters. Overall, patients stayed 14.6 days with a mortality of 11.1%.

CONCLUSION

VFs are a severe event in oldest-old patients with a crucial risk of poor medical outcomes during hospitalization. The fracture morphologies are of central importance. However, little is known about the hospital stay of oldest-old inpatients with VFs. Considering an aging population, further investigations would be recommended.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for walking independence in hospitalized older adults with a vertebral compression fracture

OBJECTIVE

No reports on factors or Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) associated with walking independence among patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are available. Evidence regarding epidemiological walking independence rates is also sparse. Here, we sought to (i) obtain epidemiological data on the probability of inpatients with VCFs achieving walking independence, and (ii) develop and validate a CPR to determine walking independence in hospitalized patients with VCFs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional observational study of patients aged ≥60 years who were hospitalized for VCF at four hospitals in Japan in 2019-2022. The outcome was walking independence at discharge. We performed a binomial logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of walking independence. Five independent variables were entered: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, cognitive function, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and 10-m walking test. Among the independent variables that were significant, we converted the continuous variables to binary data by calculating cut-off values and then created the CPR. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as the measure of the CPR's diagnostic accuracy, and internal validation was conducted by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients, 188 (78.3%) achieved walking independence. Cognitive function and the BBS score (with a cut-off of 45 points) were identified as significant predictors. We created a CPR using these two items (0-2 points). The CPR's AUC was 0.92 (0.874-0.967), and internal validation by bootstrapping yielded a mean AUC of 0.919 with a slope of 0.965.

CONCLUSION

The walking independence rate of patients with a VCF during hospitalization was 78.3%, with cognitive function and BBS being predictors. The developed CPR performed well enough to retrospectively predict walking independence in VCF patients. The BBS cut-off value and the CPR may serve as useful indicators for clinicians to predict VCF patients' walking independence.

Older patients with vertebral and pelvic fractures: Study protocol of a clinical cohort

BACKGROUND

Vertebral and pelvic fractures are associated with a significant burden of negative health and psychosocial outcomes. The number of vertebral and pelvic fractures is increasing in an aging society. Vertebral and pelvic fractures are increasingly significant injuries for individuals and society. However, few epidemiological studies have examined the clinical course of vertebral and pelvic fractures. This is the protocol for a study that observes patients who have been admitted to the hospital with an incident vertebral or pelvic fracture for a period of 12 months.

METHODS

The observational cohort study is conducted at three study sites in Germany. Patients affected by vertebral or pelvic fractures are recruited within the first few days of hospital admission. Data collection takes place at four-time points: baseline, before discharge, after 4 months, and after 12 months after admission to the hospital. Particular emphasis is laid on the assessment of the fall mechanisms, physical function, physical activity, life space, mobility, treatment approach, and quality of life. The hospital stay involves the collection of biomaterials (blood and urine).

DISCUSSION

The study aims to enhance understanding of the clinical progression and outcomes in patients with fractures in the vertebrae or pelvis.

Mortality, Analgesic Use, and Care Requirements After Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 18,392 Older Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in older adults cause considerable health and socioeconomic burdens due to worsening ability to perform activities of daily living. The long-term effects of VCFs on patient outcomes, particularly prolonged analgesic use and functional decline, remain unknown. The aims of this study were to examine long-term clinical outcomes and to determine the risk factors for persistent pain and functional disability after VCFs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated mortality, duration of analgesic use, and changes in care requirements in older adults with VCFs using claims data from a suburban prefecture in the Greater Tokyo Area. Patients were included if they were ≥65 years of age and had been diagnosed with a VCF between June 2014 and February 2019, as determined on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes; we also used claims data that could determine whether the patients underwent imaging examinations. Patients who discontinued outpatient visits within 1 month after the VCF diagnosis were excluded.

RESULTS

We included 18,392 patients with VCFs and a mean age of 80 years. Seventy-six percent of patients were women, and the median follow-up period was 670 days. At the index VCF diagnosis, 3,631 patients (19.7%) were care-dependent. Overall, 968 patients (5.3%) died within 1 year. Among the 8,375 patients who received analgesics, 22% required analgesics for >4 months. Factors associated with prolonged analgesic use for >1 year were female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16 to 1.65]) and VCFs in the thoracolumbar region (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.50 to 2.55]) or lumbar region (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.23 to 2.04]) (the reference was the thoracic region). The care needs of 1,510 patients (8.2%) increased within 1 year. Patients with a preexisting care dependency had a 10 times higher risk of increased care need (30.2% [1,060 of 3,509]) than those who had been independent at the time of the index diagnosis (3.0% [450 of 14,761]) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with preexisting care dependency were more likely to experience functional decline following VCFs than those who were independent, which underscores the need for intensive and appropriate allocation of health-care resources to care-dependent patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hospitalizations for hip and non-hip osteoporotic fractures in Belgium: nationwide trends between 2010 and 2021

This study aimed to describe the incidence of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures in patients aged 50 years and over in Belgium between 2010 and 2021. A declining trend in crude and age-adjusted hospitalization incidence was observed, however, the absolute number of hospitalisations for osteoporotic fractures increased due to demographic changes.

PURPOSE

The secular trends of hospitalizations for hip and other osteoporotic fractures between 2010 and 2021 in patients aged 50 years and over in Belgium are unknown. This study aimed to describe the incidence of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures in patients aged 50 years and over in Belgium between 2010 and 2021.

METHODS

Population-based, retrospective study based on hospitalization data extracted by the national database NIHDI and demographical data retrieved from the Belgian Federal Bureau for Statistics. Data were combined to determine the crude and age-standardized hospitalization incidence of fractures of the hip, distal femur, pelvis, humerus, wrist, and spine (2010 as the reference year).

RESULTS

A total of 445,234 hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures were reported between 2010 and 2021 (excluding 2015). Hospitalizations increased by 5.8% between 2010 and 2021 (p = 0.013) with a higher increase in men (12.1%; p = 0.001) compared to women (4.1%; p = 0.041). The crude incidence of hospitalizations for all fractures per 100,000 persons per year decreased from 990 to 910 between 2010 and 2021 (p = 0.572). The age-standardized incidence for hospitalizations of any osteoporotic fracture in men declined from 5.30/1,000 to 4.42/1,000 (p = 0.010). In women, a similar decrease was observed (13.84/1,000 to 11.62/1,000; p = 0.003). Both age-standardized hospitalizations for hip and non-hip fractures showed a decrease in both sexes.

CONCLUSION

Although a declining trend in the crude incidence per 100,000 and in the age-adjusted incidence of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures was observed, the absolute number of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures increased due to the demographic change of an ageing population.

Minimal important change in the Berg Balance Scale in older women with vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method.

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study.

PATIENTS

Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface.

METHODS

A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MICROC), the predictive modeling method (MICpred), and the MICpred-based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MICadj).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine women comprised the "important change" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MICROC (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MICpred (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MICadj (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points.

CONCLUSION

For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.

Polypharmacy and risk of fractures in older adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fractures have serious health consequences in older adults. While some medications are individually associated with increased risk of falls and fractures, it is not clear if this holds true for the use of many medications (polypharmacy). We aimed to identify what is known about the association between polypharmacy and the risk of fractures in adults aged ≥65 and to examine the methods used to study this association.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of studies published up to October 2023 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, then performed data extraction and quality assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 31 studies included, 11 different definitions of polypharmacy were used and were based on three medication counting methods (concurrent use 15/31, cumulative use over a period 6/31, daily average 3/31, and indeterminate 7/31). Overall, polypharmacy was frequent and associated with higher fracture risk. A dose-response relationship between increasing number of medications and increased risk of fractures was observed. However, only seven studies adjusted for major confounders (age, sex, and chronic disease). The quality of the studies ranged from poor to high.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy appears to be a relevant modifiable risk factor for fractures in older individuals that can easily be used to identify those at risk. The diversity of medication calculation methods and definitions of polypharmacy highlights the importance of a detailed methodology to understand and compare results.

Management of Vertebral Fragility Fracture in Older People: Recommendations from a Spanish Consensus of Experts

Vertebral fragility fractures (VFF) pose a challenge for appropriate care. The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations for the management of VFF in older people from a multidisciplinary approach. Specialists in osteoporosis belonging to different scientific societies reviewed the main clinical practice guidelines published in Spain in 2014. Thirty-five recommendations for the management of VFF were evaluated by seven experts using an anonymous survey. Consensus was defined as 80% of responses of 8 (agree) and 9 (strongly agree) on a Likert scale. Consensus was achieved in 22 recommendations (62.8%). The experts agreed on the need for anamnesis, clinical assessment, and laboratory tests, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, proteinography, and the assessment of levels of calcium, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Optional tests, such as bone turnover markers (BTMs), magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy, or using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®), did not achieve an agreed consensus. Also, there was consensus regarding the administration of calcium/vitamin D supplements, the withdrawal of toxic habits, and personalized physical exercise. Participants agreed on the administration of teriparatide for 24 months and then a switch to denosumab or bisphosphonates in patients at high risk of fracture. Specialists in osteoporosis, primary care physicians, and geriatricians should be involved in the follow-up of patients with VFF. Although there was multidisciplinary agreement on diagnostic tests and non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment in frail older people, therapeutic objectives should be individualized for every patient. In addition to the specific recommendations, close collaboration between the geriatrician and the primary care physician is essential for the optimal chronic management of frail patients with fragility fractures.

Analysis of Long-Term Medical Expenses in Vertebral Fracture Patients

Background

The objective of this study was to analyze the direct medical expenses of a vertebral fracture cohort (VC) and a matched cohort (MC) over 5 years preceding and following the fracture, analyze the duration of the rise in medical expenses due to the fracture, and examine whether the expenses vary with age group, utilizing a national claims database.

Methods

Subjects with vertebral fractures and matched subjects were chosen from the National Health Insurance Service Sample cohort (NHIS-Sample) of South Korea. Patients with vertebral fractures were either primarily admitted to acute care hospitals (index admissions) or those who received kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty during the follow-up period (2002-2015). A risk-set matching was performed using 1 : 5 random sampling to simulate a real-world situation. Individual-level direct medical expenses per quarter were calculated for 5 years prior and subsequent to the vertebral fracture. In this analysis using a comparative interrupted time series design, we examined the direct medical expenses of a VC and an MC.

Results

A total of 3,923 incident vertebral fracture patients and 19,615 matched subjects were included in this study. The mean age was 75.5 ± 7.4 years, and 69.5% were women. The mean difference in medical expenses between the two groups increased steadily before the fracture. The medical expenses of the VC peaked in the first quarter following the fracture. The cost changes were 1.82 times higher for the VC than for the MC (95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.04; p < 0.001) in the first year. Subsequently, there were no differential changes in medical expenses between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the < 70-year subgroup, there were no differential changes in medical expenses between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, in the ≥ 80-year subgroup, the cost changes for the VC were higher than those for the MC up to 5 years after time zero.

Conclusions

Based on our study results, we suggest that health and medical policies for vertebral fractures should be designed to last up to approximately 1 year after the fracture. Health policies should be differentiated according to age group.

Early Vertebroplasty for Severely Painful Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Critical Review of the Literature

Vertebroplasty has emerged over the last 30 years as a common treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Patient selection and the time at which vertebroplasty is offered to the patient varies between centres and regions. Vertebroplasty has been studied in comparison to placebo intervention in five blinded trials. One such trial showed more benefit from vertebroplasty than placebo when the procedure was mostly performed within 3 weeks of fracture onset. Others showed no additional benefit from vertebroplasty compared to placebo when it was performed later in the natural history of the fracture. In this review, we examine data from blinded and open label randomised studies of vertebroplasty for evidence relating specifically to the use of early vertebroplasty for patients with severely painful acute osteoporotic fractures.

Spinal medial branch nerve root block (MBNB) intervention compared to standard care-vertebroplasty (VP) for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures in frail, older hospitalised patients: a feasibility study

Our study aimed to assess the feasibility outcomes comparing spinal medial branch nerve root block intervention to standard care vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures in frail, hospitalised older patients. We found the study to be feasible and now propose a clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety evaluation.

INTRODUCTION

Vertebroplasty (VP) is a key-hole procedure involving injection of bone cement into a fractured vertebral body, to reduce pain and increase vertebral body stability, although it is associated with a small risk of complications, particularly in frail, older hospitalised patients. Medial branch spinal nerve block (MBNB) may be an alternative treatment to alleviate pain symptoms, with less complications; however, no study has prospectively compared the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of MBNB to VP, in frail, older hospitalised patients. The aim of our study was to conduct a 1st stage feasibility study, exploring recruitment, retention and several outcomes measures (means and SDs), together with qualitative interviews to assess participant and clinician views, to inform a definitive larger study.

METHODS

We conducted a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial with participants allocated to continue with routine surgical care-VP or MBNB treatment, with an embedded qualitative study. Data was collected at baseline, week 1, 4, and week 8.

RESULTS

Out of 40 eligible patients, 30 (75%) consented to take part in the study. The overall median time from randomisation to intervention was 3 days, IQR 1-7 days, 5 (1-7) days for VP and 2 (1-3) days for MBNB. Median (IQR) length of hospital stay for the VP group was 20 (8) days and for the MBNB 15(22) days. The proportion of completeness of outcome data collection at weeks 1, 4 and 8 was at least 77%: 14 (100%), 12 (85.7%) and 11(78.9%) for VP and 13 (100%), 12 (92.3%) and 10 (76.8%) for MBNB, respectively. There were no significant difference in the clinical outcomes or adverse events between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Our study was feasible in achieving is target recruitment, participants adhered to the randomisation and at least 77% completeness of data at the 8 week end-point (target 75%). We now plan to conduct a definitive clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety outcome study, comparing VP to MBNB in frail, older patients hospitalised with an acute vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

Healthcare costs associated with opportunistically identifiable vertebral fractures

PURPOSE

Vertebral fractures (VFs) are often available on radiological imaging undertaken during daily clinical work, yet the healthcare cost burden of these opportunistically identifiable fractures has not previously been reported. In this study, we examine the direct healthcare costs of subjects with vertebral fractures available for identification on routine CT scans.

METHODS

Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures were identified from 2000 routine CT scans. Subjects with VF on the scan were matched 1:2 against subjects with no VF on the scan, and similarly in a 1:3-ratio against a general population cohort. We excluded those subjects who received treatment with osteoporosis medication(s) in the year prior to baseline. Direct healthcare costs, identified from the national Danish registers, were accrued over up to 6 years of follow-up, and reported per day at risk and per year.

RESULTS

In subjects undergoing a CT scan, costs were initially high, yet declined over time. Comparing subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture (n = 321) against those subjects with no vertebral fracture (n = 606), mean total healthcare costs per day at risk was numerically higher in the first three years after baseline, while healthcare costs per year were similar between the cohorts. No differences reached statistical significance. When compared to the general population cohort, costs were significantly higher in the vertebral fracture cohort.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with vertebral fractures available for identification on routine CT scans incur substantially higher healthcare costs than matched subjects representing the general population, and numerically, albeit non-significantly, higher healthcare costs per day at risk in the short term, as compared to subjects with no visible VF on the CT scan.

From research to daily clinical practice: implementation of orthogeriatric co-management in the trauma ward

Introduction

Evidence strongly suggests that orthogeriatric co-management improves patient outcomes in frail older patients with a fracture, but evidence regarding how to implement this model of care in daily clinical practice is scarce. In this paper, we first describe the implementation process and selection of implementation strategies for an orthogeriatric co-management program in the traumatology ward of the University Hospitals Leuven in Belgium. Second, we report the results of a multi-method feasibility study. This study (1) measures the fidelity towards the program's core components, (2) quantifies the perceived feasibility and acceptability by the healthcare professionals, and (3) defines implementation determinants.

Methods

Implementation strategies were operationalized based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) guidelines. In the feasibility study, fidelity towards the core components of the program was measured in a group of 15 patients aged 75 years and over by using electronic health records. Feasibility and acceptability as perceived by the involved healthcare professionals was measured using a 15-question survey with a 5-point Likert scale. Implementation determinants were mapped thematically based on seven focus group discussions and two semi-structured interviews by focusing on the healthcare professionals' experiences.

Results

We observed low fidelity towards completion of a screening questionnaire to map the premorbid situation (13%), but high fidelity towards the other program core components: multidimensional evaluation (100%), development of an individual care plan (100%), and systematic follow-up (80%). Of the 50 survey respondents, 94% accepted the program and 62% perceived it as feasible. Important implementation determinants were feasibility, awareness and familiarity, and improved communication between healthcare professionals that positively influenced program adherence.

Conclusions

Fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of an orthogeriatric co-management program were high as a result of an iterative process of selecting implementation strategies with intensive stakeholder involvement from the beginning.

Clinical trial registration

[https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN20491828], International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Registry: [ISRCTN20491828]. Registered on October 11, 2021.

Fracture Risk in Men and Women With Vertebral Fractures Identified Opportunistically on Routine Computed Tomography Scans and Not Treated for Osteoporosis: An Observational Cohort Study

Vertebral fractures (VFs) have been associated with future fractures, yet few studies have evaluated whether this pertains to VFs available for identification on routine radiological imaging. We sought to evaluate the risk of subsequent fractures in subjects with VF identified opportunistically on computed tomography (CT) scans performed as part of routine clinical practice. From the radiology database of Holbæk Hospital we identified the first CT scan including the thorax and/or abdomen of 2000 consecutive men and women aged 50 years or older, performed from January 1, 2010 onward. The scans were assessed in a blinded approach to identify chest and lumbar VF, and these data linked to national Danish registers. Subjects were excluded if treated with an osteoporosis medication (OM) in the year prior to baseline (date of CT), and the remaining subjects with VF matched on age and sex in 1:2 ratio against subjects with no VF. We found that the risk of major osteoporotic fractures (hip, non-cervical vertebral, humerus, and distal forearm fractures) was higher for subjects with VF than without VF: incidence rates (IRs) were 32.88 and 19.59 fractures per 1000 subject-years, respectively, and the adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.86). Subsequent hip fracture IRs were 16.75 and 6.60; HRadj 3.02 (95% CI, 1.39-6.55). There were no significant differences in other fracture outcomes (including a pooled estimate of any subsequent fracture, except face, skull, and fingers: IRs 41.52 and 31.38; HRadj 1.31 [95% CI, 0.85-2.03]). Our findings suggest that subjects undergoing routine CT scans including the chest and/or abdomen are a high risk population in terms of fracture risk. Even within this group, subjects with VF are at higher risk of future major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), in particular hip fracture. Hence, systematic opportunistic screening for VF and subsequent fracture risk management is important to reduce the risk of new fractures. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Patient perspectives and experiences

OBJECTIVE

To understand perceptions on rehabilitation after vertebral fracture, non-pharmacological strategies, and virtual care from the perspective of individuals living with vertebral fractures.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted semi-structured interviews online and performed a thematic and content analysis from a post-positivism perspective.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten individuals living with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (9F, 1 M, aged 71  ±  8 years).

RESULTS

Five themes emerged: pain is the defining limitation of vertebral fracture recovery; delayed diagnosis impacts recovery trajectory; living with fear; being dissatisfied with fracture management; and "getting back into the game of life" using non-pharmacological strategies.

CONCLUSION

Participants reported back pain and an inability to perform activities of daily living, affecting psychological and social well-being. Physiotherapy, education, and exercise were considered helpful and important to patients; however, issues with fracture identification and referral limited the use of these options. Participants believed that virtual rehabilitation was a feasible and effective alternative to in-person care, but perceived experience with technology, cost, and individualization of programs as barriers.

Cumulated ambulation score in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures is an important predictor of returning home: a retrospective cohort study

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are recognized as a serious problem in the aging society. In this study, we found that the cumulated ambulation score predicts returning home in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The cumulated ambulation score is an important piece of information in determining the destination of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a serious problem affecting the health status of the elderly, and if they require inpatient treatment, they may have difficulty deciding where to discharge. The study's purpose is to investigate whether the cumulated ambulation scores predict returning home for hospitalized osteoporotic vertebral fractures patients.

METHODS

The subjects were 120 osteoporotic vertebral fractures patients aged 65 years or older who were admitted to our hospital between April 2015 and March 2022. The cumulated ambulation scores for all subjects were measured in the 3-days right after admission. A multivariable analysis was performed with the dependent variable as whether the patient returned home and the independent variable as the cumulated ambulation score. Three models were created from the measured cumulated ambulation score, and each model was analyzed as an independent variable (model 1; score on the 1st day, model 2; total score on the 2-days, model 3; total score on the 3-days).

RESULTS

The length of hospitalization for the osteoporotic vertebral fracture's patients were 11.8 ± 5.3 days, and 80 (66.7%) returned home. Multivariable analysis showed that cumulated ambulation score was a predictor of returning home (model 1, odds ratio: 3.151, 95% confidence interval: 2.074-5.203; model 2, odds ratio: 2.234, 95% confidence interval: 1.685-3.187; model 3, odds ratio: 1.929, 95% confidence interval: 1.535-2.599).

CONCLUSION

The cumulated ambulation score of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures right after admission is a factor that affected returning home and is useful in determining where patients are discharged.

A 3-year retrospective analysis of patients admitted with clinical vertebral fragility fractures across hospitals in England, UK

Our database aimed to assess the impact of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) on hospitalisation in England. The results showed that admissions secondary to VFF are increasing annually, more significantly in patients aged 75 years and over. Vertebral augmentation has been showed to reduce length of stay in hospital.

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) are the most common osteoporotic fracture. VFF can result in significant pain requiring hospitalisation. However, there are little data on patient numbers, hospital bed days, and costs, contributed to by these patients.

METHODOLOGY

We report a retrospective analysis of patients aged 55 years and over admitted to hospitals across England from 2017 to 2019. ICD-10 classifications for VFF and OPCS codes were used to identify admissions and patients who had undergone vertebral augmentation (VA).

RESULTS

There were 99,370 patients (61% female) admitted during this period, with 64,370 (65%) patients aged over 75 years. There was a 14.3% average increase in admissions annually. Patients aged over 75 years accounted for 1.5 million bed days, costing £465 million (median length of stay (MLOS) 14.4 days). In comparison, those aged 55-74 years, accounted for 659,000 bed days, costing £239 million (MLOS 10.7 days). The majority of patients (84%) were admitted under a non-surgical speciality and were primarily older (median age 76.8 vs 67.6 years, MLOS 8.2 vs 6.0 days), compared to those admitted to surgical wards 1755 patients underwent vertebral augmentation (VA) (1.8% of the total cohort). The median age of patients undergoing VA was 73.3 years, with 775 (44.2%) of these were aged 75 years and over. In comparison, the median age of patients managed conservatively (non-surgically) was 75.7 years, with 63,595 patients (65.1%) aged 75 years and over. The MLOS and cost per patient admission were lower in the VA group compared to those managed non-surgically.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalised VFF patients represented a significant number, cost, and use of bed days. Those undergoing VA had a significantly shorter length of stay. Further studies are necessary to define those who may benefit from early VA.

Improved activities of daily living in elderly patients with increased skeletal muscle mass during vertebral compression fracture rehabilitation

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that elderly patients with greater skeletal muscle mass have better activities of daily living (ADLs) than those with less skeletal muscle mass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between ADL improvement and changes in skeletal muscle mass among older patients ≥ 80 years of age who were undergoing rehabilitation for vertebral compression fracture (VCF).

METHODS

This case-control study was conducted at a rehabilitation hospital. The participants were 149 patients aged ≥ 80 years undergoing VCF rehabilitation. Patients were divided into two groups based on changes in their skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) during the hospitalization period: one group with increased SMI and the other without increased SMI. Between-group and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with SMI increase.

RESULTS

The functional independence measure (FIM) gain was significantly higher in the group with SMI increase (36.0 [27.0-52.5], p = 0.016) than in the group without SMI increase (29.0 [19.0-41.0]). SMI gain was significantly associated with motor FIM gain (coefficient, 4.857; 95% confidence interval, 1.311-8.403; p = 0.008). Motor FIM and MMSE on admission, the necessity of assistance in ADL before the injury, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, were also significantly associated with motor FIM gain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that rehabilitation to gain skeletal muscle was effective in improving ADLs in elderly patients with VCF. We might encourage older patients with VCFs to undertake rehabilitation for the purpose of building skeletal muscle and improving their ADLs, and to not refrain from such rehabilitation due to old age and fractures.

The Acute VertEbRal AugmentaTion (AVERT) study: protocol for a randomised controlled, feasibility trial of spinal medial branch nerve block in hospitalised older patients with vertebral fragility fractures

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture found in older people, resulting in increasing morbidity and excess mortality. These fractures can cause significant pain, requiring admission to hospital. Vertebroplasty (VP) is effective in reducing pain and allowing early mobilisation in hospitalised patients. However, it may be associated with complications such as cement leakage, infection, bleeding at the injection site and fracture of adjacent vertebrae. It is also costly and not readily accessible in many UK hospitals.A recent retrospective study reported that spinal medial branch nerve block (MBNB), typically used to treat facet arthropathy, had similar efficacy in terms of pain relief compared with VP for the treatment of painful VFF. However, to date, no study has prospectively compared MBNB to VP. We therefore propose a prospective feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the role of MBNB to VP, in hospitalised older patients.

METHOD

A parallel, two-arm RCT with participants allocated on a 1:1 ratio to either standard care-VP or MBNB in hospitalised patients aged over 70 with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Follow-up will be at weeks 1, 4 and 8 post intervention. The primary objective is to determine the feasibility and design of a future trial, including specific outcomes of recruitment, adherence to randomisation and safety. Embedded within the trial will be a health economic evaluation to understand resource utilisation and implications of the intervention and a qualitative study of the experiences and insights of trial participants and clinicians. Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, analgesia requirements, resource use and quality of life data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by the Yorkshire & the Humber Research Ethics Committee (reference 21/YH/0065). AVERT (Acute VertEbRal AugmentaTion) has received approval by the Health Research Authority (reference IRAS 293210) and is sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (reference 21HC001). Recruitment is ongoing. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted to appropriate journals for publication on completion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN18334053.

Comparison of the incidence rates of hip and vertebral fragility fractures according to cataract surgery in elderly population: a nationwide cohort study

Elderly patients who underwent cataract surgery showed lower prevalence and cumulative incidence rates of hip and vertebral fragility fractures than those who did not. Therefore, cataract surgery in elderly patients may reduce the incidence of hip and vertebral fragility fractures.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence rates of hip and vertebral fragility fractures between patients who underwent cataract surgery and those who did not, and to investigate the effect of cataract surgery on the incidence of fragility fracture in elderly population using nationwide claims data.

METHODS

A total of 558,147 participants from the National Health Insurance Service - Senior cohort were included. The participants were set into the hip fracture group (507,651) and vertebral fracture group (507,899) depending on the type of fracture.

RESULTS

The number of hip fractures that occurred in the non-cataract surgery (NC) group was 36,971 (9.9%), while 8850 (6.6%) hip fractures occurred in the cataract surgery (C) group. The number of vertebral fractures that occurred in the NC group was 38,689 (10.3%), while 10,112 (7.6%) vertebral fractures occurred in the C group (all p < .001). The hazard ratios of hip and vertebral fractures were 0.58 and 0.60 for the total population that had undergone cataract surgery (all p < .001). The cumulative incidence rates of both fractures in the cataract surgery group were significantly lower than those in the non-cataract surgery group during 10 years (all p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients who underwent cataract surgery showed a lower prevalence of hip and vertebral fragility fractures than those who did not. In addition, the cumulative incidence rates of both fractures in the cataract surgery group were lower than those in the non-cataract surgery group. Therefore, cataract surgery in elderly patients may reduce the incidence of hip and vertebral fragility fractures.

Effect of Early Rehabilitation Treatment on Activities of Daily Living in Patients Receiving Conservative Treatment for Vertebral Compression Fracture

Objectives

: Vertebral compression fractures are common among older people. Currently, knowledge of the effects of early rehabilitation treatment on the recovery of activities of daily living (ADL) in older patients who receive conservative treatment for these fractures is limited. Using the instrumental variable (IV) method, we examined the effects on ADL at discharge of a delay in initiating rehabilitation treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database were analyzed. The subjects were patients with vertebral compression fracture who had undergone rehabilitation treatment during their hospitalization between 2014 and 2019 in one of the 29 acute-care hospitals in Yamagata Prefecture. We analyzed data from 1706 patients (mean age, 82.1 years). The independent variable was the number of days between hospital admission and the start of rehabilitation treatment, and the outcome was the Barthel index (BI) score at discharge. An IV method was applied, with adjustments for covariates, including demographics and functional status at admission.

Results

Most patients started rehabilitation treatment within 3 days of hospital admission. Our IV method showed that the interval between hospital admission and the start of rehabilitation treatment was significantly associated with the BI score at discharge. The coefficient was -2.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.06 to -0.35).

Conclusions

A delay in initiating rehabilitation treatment had a negative effect on ADL at discharge. This result emphasizes the importance of including early rehabilitation treatment in acute care, as recommended by several existing guidelines for the treatment of orthopedic diseases.

Interventional Procedures for Vertebral Diseases: Spinal Tumor Ablation, Vertebral Augmentation, and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation-A Scoping Review

Low back pain is consistently documented as the most expensive and leading cause of disability. The majority of cases have non-specific etiologies. However, a subset of vertebral diseases has well-documented pain generators, including vertebral body tumors, vertebral body fractures, and vertebral endplate injury. Over the past two decades, specific interventional procedures targeting these anatomical pain generators have been widely studied, including spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation. This scoping review summarizes safety and clinical efficacy and discusses the impact on healthcare utilization of these interventions. Vertebral-related diseases remain a top concern with regard to prevalence and amount of health care spending worldwide. Our study shows that for a subset of disorders related to the vertebrae, spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation are safe and clinically effective interventions to decrease pain, improve function and quality of life, and potentially reduce mortality, improve survival, and overall offer cost-saving opportunities.

Insufficient increase in bone mineral density testing rates and pharmacotherapy after hip and vertebral fracture: analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan

Test and treatment rates for osteoporosis in Japan aimed at preventing secondary fragility fractures were insufficient. Those who suffered hip fractures had approximately half the rates of those who suffered vertebral fractures, with such rates being lower among those over 80 years old and males.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to examine the care gap for secondary fracture prevention in Japan given the few large-scale studies regarding the matter.

METHODS

Changes in bone mineral density testing (test rate) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy administration (treatment rate) rates before and after hip and vertebral fracture registration were examined using medical insurance data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan issued from April 2012 to March 2019.

RESULTS

The hip fracture group comprised 677,480 women and 264,003 men, the vertebral fracture group comprised 703,247 women and 251,542 men, and the mixed fracture group comprised 3614 women and 1055 men. Test rates were 14.1%, 25.3%, and 17.6% prior to fracture registration (pre-registration) and 22.3%, 43.6%, and 28.1% after fracture registration (post-registration) in the hip, vertebral, and mixed fracture groups, respectively. Moreover, pre-registration treatment rates were 21.2%, 33.5%, and 30.7%, while post-registration rates were 31.6%, 61.7%, and 46.6% in the hip, vertebral, and mixed fracture groups, respectively. All fracture groups showed a tendency for decreased post-registration test and treatment rates among those aged over 80 years old, with men having lower rates. Moreover, 184,180 (19.4% of whom received new treatment) and 707,263 (23.8% of whom received new treatment) patients with and without polypharmacy underwent treatment after registration, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To bridge the care gap following fractures, medical professionals should change their perception regarding osteoporosis treatment in patients with hip fractures, elderly individuals undergoing polypharmacy, and males.

Direct costs of common osteoporotic fractures (Hip, Vertebral and Forearm) in Iran

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic fractures impose significant costs on society. The objective of this study was to estimate the direct costs of the hip, vertebral, and forearm fractures in the first year after fracture incidence in Iran.

METHODS

We surveyed a sample of 300 patients aged over 50 years with osteoporotic fractures (hip, vertebral, and forearm) admitted to four hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, during 2017 and were alive six months after the fracture. Inpatient cost data were obtained from the hospital patient records. Using a questionnaire, the data regarding outpatient costs were collected through a phone interview with patients at least six months after the fracture incidence. Direct medical and non-medical costs were estimated from a societal perspective. All costs were converted to the US dollar using the average exchange rate in 2017 (1USD = IRR 34,214) RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the patient was 69.83 ± 11.25 years, and 68% were female. One hundred and seventeen (39%) patients had hip fractures, 56 (18.67%) patients had vertebral fractures, and 127 (42.33%) ones had forearm fractures. The mean direct cost (medical and non-medical) during the year after hip, vertebral and forearm fractures were estimated at USD5,381, USD2,981, and USD1,209, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The direct cost of osteoporotic fracture in Iran is high. Our findings might be useful for the economic evaluation of preventive and treatment interventions for osteoporotic fractures as well as estimating the economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Iran.

Management of patients admitted to hospital with acute vertebral fragility fractures: a modified Delphi study

INTRODUCTION

Acute vertebral fragility fracture requiring hospital admission is common, painful and disabling. No comprehensive clinical guideline for their care exists. To support the development of such a guideline, we sought the views of experts in the field.

METHODS

A modified Delphi study was used. A total of 70 statements were presented, using an online platform, over three consensus-seeking rounds, to participants with experience in the hospital care of patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures from UK-based specialist societies. Participants rated the level of their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined at 70% of respondents choosing either agree/strongly agree or disagree/strong disagree. Over the first two rounds, statements not reaching consensus were modified in subsequent rounds, and new statements proposed by participants and agreed by the research team could be added.

RESULTS

There were 71 participants in the first round, 37 in the second round and 28 (most of whom were geriatricians) in the third round. Consensus was reached in 52 statements covering fracture diagnosis, second-line imaging, organisation of hospital care, pain management and falls and bone health assessment. Consensus was not achieved for whether vertebral fragility fractures should be managed in a specific clinical area.

DISCUSSION

These findings provide the basis for the development of clinical guidelines and quality improvement initiatives. They also help to justify research into the merits of managing acute vertebral fragility fracture patients in a specific clinical area.

Vertebral compression fractures: Still an unpredictable aspect of osteoporosis

Vertebral compression fracture is a hallmark of osteoporosis (OP) and by far the most prevalent fragility fracture. It is well proven that patients who develop a vertebral compression fracture are at substantial risk for additional fractures. Diagnosis is based on adequate clinical evaluation, imaging, and laboratory tests. The imaging of OP and fragility fractures includes conventional radiology to evaluate spinal fractures, bone mineral density (BMD) testing by dual energy x-ray densitometry, quantitative computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy (if necessary), and ultrasound. Screening and treatment of individuals with high risk of osteoporotic fracture are cost-effective, but approximately two-thirds of the vertebral compression fractures (VCF) that occur each year are not accurately diagnosed and, therefore, not treated. Evaluation of VCFs, even though they may be asymptomatic, seems essential to health-related and/or clinical research on OP.

The Presentation of Older People with Vertebral Fragility Fractures to a University Hospital: A Cross-sectional Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of robust data on hospitalised acute vertebral fragility fractures. This analysis aimed to report on the number of hospitalised vertebral fragility fractures treated in a large UK teaching hospital. This information would support better design of hospital services and resource allocation to manage this group of patients.

METHODS

Patients aged 50 years and over hospitalised with a vertebral fragility fracture from 1/2/2016 to 31/1/2017 were identified from radiology and hospital records. Patients sustaining vertebral fractures due to either major trauma or malignancy were excluded. Data was collected on patient demographics, fracture details, hospitalisation details and health outcomes.

RESULTS

208 patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures were hospitalised over a 12 month period. The mean (SD) age was 80.5 (11) years, of which 68% were female. 94% presented to the Emergency Department (ED) as their first point of contact, of which 70% were subsequently hospitalised. Two-thirds presented with a single level vertebral fracture predominantly around the thoracolumbar region. The majority (87%) were non-operatively managed by general physicians, of which most were under Geriatric Medicine. The median length of stay was 12 (IQR 6-20) days and inpatient mortality was 3%. 52% of patients went on to have a bone health assessment.

CONCLUSION

We have reported on the number of patients presenting to hospital with an acute vertebral fragility fracture over 12 months. This helps identify resources needed to design hospital services to manage them adequately.

A Review on the Role of Denosumab in Fracture Prevention

Denosumab is a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand inhibitor, which suppresses the bone resorption process to preserve bone mass. It is usually recommended to postmenopausal women and men with high fracture risk. With the recent publication of the results from FREEDOM study and its extension, the long-term effect of denosumab in preventing fragility fractures has been put forward. This review aims at summarising the evidence of denosumab in reducing fracture risk and its safety derived from clinical studies. Most of the evidence are derived from FREEDOM trials up to 10 years of exposure. Denosumab is reported to prevent vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. It is also proven effective in Japanese women, patients with chronic kidney diseases and breast cancer patients receiving antineoplastic therapy. Denosumab discontinuation leads to high remodeling, loss of bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. These negative effects might be preventable by bisphosphonate treatment. The safety profile of denosumab is consistent with increased years of exposure. In conclusion, denosumab is a safe and effective option for reducing fracture risk among patients with osteoporosis.

Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?

Objectives

Hip fragility fractures were regarded as one of the most severe, but recent papers report on the underestimated burden of vertebral compression fractures. This study aims to compare morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures in patients treated in the same setting.

Methods

Patients aged ≥50 years with hip fracture, and those with vertebral fracture presenting to our hospital between January 2014 and January 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated 1 year after their index fracture. SF-36 scores, mortality, and institutionalization are then recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: hip fractures and vertebral fractures.

Results

There were 106 and 90 patients respectively evaluated in hip and vertebral fracture groups at 1 year. Patients in both groups were comparable for age, sex, comorbidities and neuropsychiatric condition (P > 0.05). At 1 year follow-up, SF-36 showed better averages in all 8 scales in hip fracture group compared to vertebral fracture group. Mortality in the hip fracture group reached 32.1% compared to 10% for the vertebral fracture group (P < 0.01). Fifteen patients were institutionalized in the hip fracture group compared to 18 patients in the vertebral fracture group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

When comparing patients treated in the same setting, hip fracture is associated with significantly increased mortality than vertebral fracture; however, the latter is associated with more morbidity.

Characteristics of patients with low-trauma vertebral fractures in the United Arab Emirates: a descriptive multi-center analysis

Vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. However, the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were not explored previously in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aims to describe for the first time the demographic and morphological characteristics of patients with fragility vertebral fractures in the UAE through a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with low-trauma vertebral fractures who visited two tertiary centers during 2011-2016. The sex, age at the time of fracture, nationality, body mass index (BMI), and anatomical fracture location were recorded for each patient. Overall, 143 subjects were diagnosed with low-trauma vertebral fractures in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi during 2011-2016. Of these, 98 were women (68.5%) and 45 were men (31.5%). The overall mean patient age at diagnosis was 62.5 years, and almost half were younger than 65 years. Approximately 60% of the patients were UAE nationals. Fifty-one patients (36.7%) were obese (mean BMI: 35.3 kg/m²), and women with vertebral fractures had a significantly higher mean BMI compared with men (p = 0.041). Nearly 40% of men had a normal BMI, compared with 20% of women. Most fractures were compression fractures (77.6%) in the thoracolumbar transition region. In conclusion, patients with fragility vertebral fractures were predominantly female and tended to be overweight or obese, although male patients tended to have a lower BMI than female patients.

Racial Disparities Exist in Outcomes After Major Fragility Fractures

BACKGROUND

Fractures associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) are associated with pain, disability, and increased mortality. A recent, nationwide evaluation of racial difference in outcomes after fracture has not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if 1-year death, debility, and destitution rates differ by race.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

US Medicare data from 2010 to 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

Non-Hispanic black and white women with PMO who have sustained a fragility fracture of interest: hip, pelvis, femur, radius, ulna, humerus, and clinical vertebral.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes included 1-year: (1) mortality, identified by date of death in Medicare vital status information, (2) debility, identified as new placement in long-term nursing facilities, and (3) destitution, identified as becoming newly eligible for Medicaid.

RESULTS

Among black and white women with PMO (n = 4,523,112), we identified 399,000 (8.8%) women who sustained a major fragility fracture. Black women had a higher prevalence of femur (9.0% vs 3.9%; P < .001) and hip (30.7% vs 28.0%; P < .001) fractures and lower prevalence of radius/ulna (14.7% vs 17.0%; P < .001) and clinical vertebral fractures (28.8% vs 33.5%; P < .001) compared with white women. We observed racial differences in the incidence of 1-year outcomes after fracture. After adjusting for age, black women had significantly higher risk of mortality 1 year after femur, hip, humerus, and radius/ulna fractures; significantly higher risk of debility 1 year after femur and hip fractures; and significantly higher risk of destitution for all fractures types.

CONCLUSIONS

In a sample of Medicare data from 2010 to 2016, black women with PMO had significantly higher rates of mortality, debility, and destitution after fracture than white women. These findings are a first step toward understanding and reducing disparities in PMO management, fracture prevention, and clinical outcomes after fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1803-1810, 2020.

Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

VAPOUR found vertebroplasty (V) more effective than placebo (P) in patients with severe pain and fracture duration less than 6 weeks. Exploratory analysis suggested that benefits were concentrated in the subgroup of patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. This difference may account for the three negative blinded trials that included few patients within this fracture time frame.

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of early vertebroplasty for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures within 3 weeks of fracture onset in the VAPOUR study.

METHODS

Spearman's rank log coefficients were calculated to reassess the relationship of pain reduction from vertebroplasty and fracture duration in the VAPOUR trial. We more fully report baseline and outcome data in patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration.

RESULTS

There were 46V and 47P patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. Baseline characteristics were similar. In total, 86 patients (41V, 45P) completed the 14-day questionnaire. The proportion of patients with reduction in pain from severe (NRS ≥ 7/10 was an inclusion requirement) to mild (NRS < 4) at 14 days was 21 (51%) V-group and 9 (20%) in the P-group (between-group difference 31 percentage points, 95% CI 12-50; p = 0.002). Early vertebroplasty provided greater reductions in mean NRS pain and Roland-Morris Disability.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of this patient subgroup from the VAPOUR trial, in the context of other randomised trial evidence, suggests clinically significant benefits from early vertebroplasty if performed within 3 weeks of fracture. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.

Management of hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Management of hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients was explored across all major trauma orthopaedic hospitals in Ireland. Findings, based on a survey of orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists, indicate a lack of standardised clinical care pathways. This study will inform development of clinical audit mechanisms and health service development for this large and growing fracture population in both Ireland and internationally.

PURPOSE

To explore the management of hospitalised vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) patients in Ireland.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic doctors (specialist registrar level) and physiotherapists was conducted across all hospitals with major orthopaedic trauma units in Ireland. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS (V24).

RESULTS

Responses were achieved from 100% (n = 16) of the hospitals (42 individual physiotherapists and 47 orthopaedic doctors). Conservative management was usual with both orthopaedic doctors (n = 37, 79%) and physiotherapists (n = 40, 96%) reporting prescription of bracing as common practice despite a lack of underpinning evidence. A majority (87%) of the doctors believed osteoporosis medications should commence prior to discharge from the acute setting, but 68% did not agree that responsibility for coordination and delivery of bone health assessment and fracture risk management rested with them. A majority (72%) of physiotherapists reported an absence or were unsure regarding existence of fracture liaison services. 73% of physiotherapists reported prescribing an inpatient or home (78%) exercise programme, including mobility, strength and balance exercise though detail on dose and adherence remain unknown. Wide variance in referral patterns to multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members existed although 79% of orthopaedic doctors supported an MDT approach.

CONCLUSION

Clinical care pathways for the hospitalised VFF population lack standardisation in Ireland. Key challenges reported by orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists relate to pain management, osteoporosis medication prescription, clarity on indications for bracing and a lack of fracture liaison services. Clinical guidelines, defined clinical care pathways and high-quality clinical research trials are required for VFF management.

The Nottingham Spinal Health (NoSH) Study: a cohort study of patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures

Patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures were elderly, multimorbid and frail and lead to poor outcomes. Their hospital treatment needs to consider this alongside their acute fracture. A systematic organised model of care, such as an adaptation of orthogeriatric hip fracture care, will offer a more holistic approach potentially improving their outcomes.

PURPOSE

Patients admitted to hospital with vertebral fragility fractures are elderly and have complex care needs who may benefit from specialist multidisciplinary input. To date, their characteristics and outcomes have not been reported sufficiently. This study aims to justify such a service.

METHODS

Patients admitted with an acute vertebral fragility fracture over 12 months were prospectively recruited from a university hospital in England. Data were collected soon after their admission, at discharge from hospital and 6 months after their hospital discharge on their characteristics, pain, physical functioning, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Data from 90 participants were analysed. They were mainly elderly (mean age 79.7 years), multimorbid (69% had ≥ 3 comorbid condition), frail (56% had a Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥ 5), cognitively impaired (54% had a MoCA score of < 23) and at high risk of falls (65% had fallen ≥ 2 in the previous year). Eighteen percent died at 6 months. At 6 months post-hospital discharge, 12% required a new care home admission, 37% still reported their pain to be severe and physical functioning was worse compared with their preadmission state.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures were elderly, multimorbid, frail and are susceptible to persistent pain and disability. Their treatment in hospital needs to consider this alongside their acute fracture. A systematic organised model of care, such as an adaptation of orthogeriatric hip fracture care, will offer a more holistic approach potentially improving their outcomes.

Complications after spinal fixation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with ambition multicenter study

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports on the incidence and risk factors of the complications after spinal fixation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) with neurological deficits. This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors of the complications after OVC surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, a total of 403 patients (314 women and 89 men; mean age 73.8 years) who underwent spinal fixation surgery for OVC with neurological deficits between 2005 and 2014 were enrolled. Data on patient demographics were collected, including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, steroid use, medical comorbidities, and surgical procedures. All postoperative complications that occurred within 6 weeks were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups, namely, complication group and no complication group, and risk factors for postoperative complications were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 57 patients (14.1%), and the most common complication was delirium (5.7%). In the univariate analysis, the complication group was found to be older (p = 0.039) and predominantly male (p = 0.049), with higher occurrence rate of liver disease (p = 0.001) and Parkinson's disease (p = 0.039) compared with the no-complication group. In the multivariate analysis, the significant independent risk factors were age (p = 0.021; odds ratio [OR] 1.051, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.007-1.097), liver disease (p < 0.001; OR 8.993, 95% CI 2.882-28.065), and Parkinson's disease (p = 0.009; OR 3.636, 95% CI 1.378-9.599).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after spinal fixation surgery for OVC with neurological deficits occurred in 14.1%. Age, liver disease, and Parkinson's disease were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

Exercise or manual physiotherapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: three-arm PROVE RCT

BACKGROUND

A total of 25,000 people in the UK have osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). Evidence suggests that physiotherapy may have an important treatment role.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two different physiotherapy programmes for people with OVF compared with a single physiotherapy session.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, adaptive, multicentre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with nested qualitative and health economic studies.

SETTING

This trial was based in 21 NHS physiotherapy departments.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants were people with symptomatic OVF.

INTERVENTIONS

Seven sessions of either manual outpatient physiotherapy or exercise outpatient physiotherapy compared with the best practice of a 1-hour single session of physiotherapy (SSPT).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were measured at 4 and 12 months. The primary outcomes were quality of life and muscle endurance, which were measured by the disease-specific QUALEFFO-41 (Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis - 41 items) and timed loaded standing (TLS) test, respectively. Secondary outcomes were (1) thoracic kyphosis angle, (2) balance, evaluated via the functional reach test (FRT), and (3) physical function, assessed via the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, a health resource use and falls diary, and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version.

RESULTS

A total of 615 participants were enrolled, with 216, 203 and 196 randomised by a computer-generated program to exercise therapy, manual therapy and a SSPT, respectively. Baseline data were available for 613 participants, 531 (86.6%) of whom were women; the mean age of these participants was 72.14 years (standard deviation 9.09 years). Primary outcome data were obtained for 69% of participants (429/615) at 12 months: 175 in the exercise therapy arm, 181 in the manual therapy arm and 173 in the SSPT arm. Interim analysis met the criteria for all arms to remain in the study. For the primary outcomes at 12 months, there were no significant benefits over SSPT of exercise [QUALEFFO-41, difference -0.23 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.20 to 1.59 points; p = 1.000; and TLS test, difference 5.77 seconds, 95% CI -4.85 to 20.46 seconds; p = 0.437] or of manual therapy (QUALEFFO-41, difference 1.35 points, 95% CI -1.76 to 2.93 points; p = 0.744; TLS test, difference 9.69 seconds (95% CI 0.09 to 24.86 seconds; p = 0.335). At 4 months, there were significant gains for both manual therapy and exercise therapy over SSPT in the TLS test in participants aged < 70 years. Exercise therapy was superior to a SSPT at 4 months in the SPPB, FRT and 6MWT and manual therapy was superior to a SSPT at 4 months in the TLS test and FRT. Neither manual therapy nor exercise therapy was cost-effective relative to a SSPT using the threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest RCT to date assessing physiotherapy in participants with OVFs. At 1 year, neither treatment intervention conferred more benefit than a single 1-hour physiotherapy advice session. The focus of future work should be on the intensity and duration of interventions to determine if changes to these would demonstrate more sustained effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49117867.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 44. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Men's experiences of having osteoporosis vertebral fractures: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analyses

Men and women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis are treated differently by society and health care professionals. This can lead to inequalities in health care and affects how men with fractures view themselves as people. We need to raise awareness that men get these fractures as well as women.

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of research exploring the experience of osteoporosis from the male perspective. This study was undertaken to explore and describe the experiences of men with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis, including their perceptions of diagnosis, treatment and changes in their sense of self.

METHODS

The study consists of in-depth semi-structured interviews with nine male participants of the PROVE (Physiotherapy Rehabilitation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture) study. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and fully transcribed. Data were coded in accordance with an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach to analyses.

RESULTS

Three main themes are presented. (i) Osteoporosis is considered an old women's disease. (ii) Men are diagnosed and treated differently than women in the NHS. Health care inequalities exist. (iii) Changes in self can occur in men after vertebral fracture/s due to osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater awareness that men get this condition is needed in both society in general and also by health care professionals who often do not expect osteoporosis to affect men. Approaches to diagnosis and treatment need to be considered and improved to ensure that they become appropriate and effective for men as well as women.

Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: What Are the Latest Data?

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures frequently result in significant morbidity and health care resource use. For patients with severe and disabling pain, vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty) is often considered. Although vertebroplasty was introduced >30 years ago, there are conflicting opinions regarding the role of these procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This review article updates clinicians on the published prospective randomized controlled data, including the most recent positive trials that followed initial negative trials in 2009. Analysis of multiple national claim datasets has also provided further insight into the utility of these procedures. Finally, we considered the recent recommendations of national organizations and medical societies that advise on the use of vertebral augmentation procedures for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.