Distinct Mutation Landscapes Between Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myelodysplasia-Related Changes and De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Establishment and validation of a gene mutation-based risk model for predicting prognosis and therapy response in acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant clonal proliferative disease of hematopoietic system. Despite tremendous progress in uncovering the AML genome, only a small number of mutations have been incorporated into risk stratification and used as therapeutic targets. In this research, we performed to construct a predictive prognosis risk model for AML patients according to gene mutations.

Methods

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology was utilized to detect gene mutation from 118 patients. mRNA expression profiles and related clinical information were mined from TCGA and GEO databases. Consensus cluster analysis was applied to obtain molecular subtypes, and differences in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and immune microenvironment of different clusters were systematically compared. According to the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between clusters, univariate and LASSO regression analysis were applied to identify gene signatures to build a prognostic risk model. Patients were classified into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups according to the median risk score (RS). Differences in prognosis, immune profile, and therapeutic sensitivity between two groups were analyzed. The independent predictive value of RS was assessed and a nomogram was developed.

Results

NGS detected 24 mutated genes, with higher mutation frequencies in CBL (63 %) and SETBP1 (49 %). Two clusters exhibited different immune microenvironments and survival probability (p = 0.0056) were identified. A total of 444 DEGs were screened in two clusters, and a mutation-associated risk model was constructed, including MPO, HGF, SH2B3, SETBP1, HLA-DRB1, LGALS1, and KDM5B. Patients in LR had a superior survival time compared to HR. Predictive performance of this model was confirmed and the developed nomogram further improved the applicability of the risk model with the AUCs for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rate were 0.829, 0.81 and 0.811, respectively. HR cases were more sensitive to erlotinib, CI-1040, and AZD6244.

Conclusion

These findings supplemented the understanding of gene mutations in AML, and constructed models had good application prospect to provide effective information for predicting prognosis and treatment response of AML.

Malignant progression of preleukemic disorders

ABSTRACT

The spectrum of myeloid disorders ranges from aplastic bone marrow failure characterized by an empty bone marrow completely lacking in hematopoiesis to acute myeloid leukemia in which the marrow space is replaced by undifferentiated leukemic blasts. Recent advances in the capacity to sequence bulk tumor population as well as at a single-cell level has provided significant insight into the stepwise process of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Using models of progression in the context of germ line predisposition (trisomy 21, GATA2 deficiency, and SAMD9/9L syndrome), premalignant states (clonal hematopoiesis and clonal cytopenia of unknown significance), and myelodysplastic syndrome, we review the mechanisms of progression focusing on the hierarchy of clonal mutation and potential roles of transcription factor alterations, splicing factor mutations, and the bone marrow environment in progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Despite major advances in our understanding, preventing the progression of these disorders or treating them at the acute leukemia phase remains a major area of unmet medical need.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions-WHO Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of Hematolymphoid tumors provides a hierarchically-driven catalog of hematologic neoplasms and introduces a series of changes to the classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Emphasizing molecular genetic findings, it expands the category of "acute myeloid leukemias with defining genetic abnormalities" while retaining the morphologically defined category of AML for cases that do not harbor disease-defining genetic drivers. The updates to the classification of AML provide refined definitions and diagnostic criteria based on clinicopathologic parameters and molecular genetic findings, emphasizing therapeutically and/or prognostically actionable biomarkers. This review provides an overview of the WHO 5th classification for AML with practical considerations for applying this classification system.

What is new in acute myeloid leukemia classification?

Recently, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification (WHO2022) introduced diagnostically similar yet distinct approaches, which has resulted in practical confusion. This review compares these classification systems for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), building up on the revised 4th edition of WHO (WHO2016). Both classifications retain recurrent genetic abnormalities as a primary consideration. However, they differ in terms of blast threshold. The ICC mandates a minimum of 10% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood, whereas the WHO2022 does not specify a blast cut-off. AML with BCR::ABL1 requires > 20% blast count in both classifications. In WHO2022, AML with CEBPA mutation requires > 20% blasts. TP53 mutation, a new entity is exclusive to ICC, diagnosed with > 20% blasts and variant allele frequency > 10%. AML with myelodysplasia-related changes is defined by cytogenetic or gene mutation-based criteria, not morphological dysplasia. Eight genes were common to both groups: ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. An additional gene, RUNX1, was included in the ICC classification. AML cases defined by differentiation (WHO2022) and AML not otherwise specified (ICC) are categorized as lacking specific defining genetic abnormalities, WHO2022 labels this as a myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy (MN-pCT), described as an appendix after specific diagnosis. Similarly, in ICC, it can be described as "therapy-related", without a separate AML category.

Fifth Edition of the World Health Classification of Tumors of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue: Myeloid Neoplasms

In this manuscript, we review myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HEM5), focusing on changes from the revised fourth edition (WHO-HEM4R). Disease types and subtypes have expanded compared with WHO-HEM4R, mainly because of the expansion in genomic knowledge of these diseases. The revised classification is based on a multidisciplinary approach including input from a large body of pathologists, clinicians, and geneticists. The revised classification follows a hierarchical structure allowing usage of family (class)-level definitions where the defining diagnostic criteria are partially met or a complete investigational workup has not been possible. Overall, the WHO-HEM5 revisions to the classification of myeloid neoplasms include major updates and revisions with increased emphasis on genetic and molecular drivers of disease. The most notable changes have been applied to the sections of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic neoplasms (previously referred to as myelodysplastic syndrome) with incorporation of novel, disease-defining genetic changes. In this review we focus on highlighting the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms, providing a comparison with WHO-HEM4R, and offering guidance on how the new classification can be applied to the diagnosis of myeloid neoplasms in routine practice.

Cytogenetics and molecular genetics of myelodysplastic neoplasms

According to the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification (5th edition), the term myelodysplastic neoplasms (abbreviated MDS) has been introduced to replace myelodysplastic syndromes. MDS are a group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell diseases characterized by cytopenia(s), dysplasia in one or more of lineages, ineffective hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of progression to bone marrow failure or to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current NCCN guidelines and recent review articles have provided in depth discussion on the clinical diagnosis and management of MDS. This review will focus on discussion of the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) updates on the role of cytogenetics and molecular genetics in the diagnosis and risk stratification of MDS.

Morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular genetic, and clinical characterization in patients with SRSF2-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

SRSF2 mutations are known to be associated with poor outcomes in myelodysplastic neoplasm, but studies on their prognostic impact on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain limited. In this retrospective study, we analyzed clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with AML and correlated the outcomes with SRSF2 mutations.

METHODS

We characterized the morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and clinical findings in AML with mutated SRSF2 and compared them with SRSF2 wild-type (WT) myeloid neoplasms (MNs).

RESULTS

Using next-generation sequencing, we identified 134 patients with MNs and SRSF2 mutations (85 with AML and 49 with MNs) in addition to 342 SRSF2-WT AMLs. Fifty-two (62%) patients with altered SRSF2 demonstrated a variable degree of morphologic dysplasia. The most frequent immunophenotypic aberrancies in SRSF2-mutant AML included diminished CD33 expression and overexpression of CD7, CD56, or CD123, similar to WT AML. More IDH1/2 (P = .015) and NPM1 (P = .002) mutations were seen in SRSF2-mutant AML than in SRSF2-mutant non-AML. Further, more IDH1/2, ASXL1, RUNX1, and STAG2 mutations were observed in SRSF2-mutant AML than in SRSF2-WT AML (P < .0001 to P = .001). Finally, patients with SRSF2-mutant AML showed a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than patients with SRSF2-WT AML (P < .0001), but this worse OS appeared to be rescued by allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute myeloid leukemia with altered SRSF2 shows a variable degree of morphologic dysplasia without uniform immunophenotypic aberrancies. SRSF2 mutations appear to be independent poor prognostic factors, but allo-SCT has improved the clinical outcomes in patients with SRSF2-mutant AML.

Interaction between myelodysplasia-related gene mutations and ontogeny in acute myeloid leukemia

Accurate classification and risk stratification are critical for clinical decision making in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the newly proposed World Health Organization and International Consensus classifications of hematolymphoid neoplasms, the presence of myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations is included as 1 of the diagnostic criteria for AML, AML-MR, based largely on the assumption that these mutations are specific for AML with an antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome. ICC also prioritizes MR gene mutations over ontogeny (as defined in the clinical history). Furthermore, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 stratifies these MR gene mutations into the adverse-risk group. By thoroughly annotating a cohort of 344 newly diagnosed patients with AML treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we show that ontogeny assignments based on the database registry lack accuracy. MR gene mutations are frequently observed in de novo AML. Among the MR gene mutations, only EZH2 and SF3B1 were associated with an inferior outcome in the univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, AML ontogeny had independent prognostic values even after adjusting for age, treatment, allo-transplant and genomic classes or ELN risks. Ontogeny also helped stratify the outcome of AML with MR gene mutations. Finally, de novo AML with MR gene mutations did not show an adverse outcome. In summary, our study emphasizes the importance of accurate ontogeny designation in clinical studies, demonstrates the independent prognostic value of AML ontogeny, and questions the current classification and risk stratification of AML with MR gene mutations.

TP53-Mutated Myelodysplasia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) form a distinct and heterogeneous group of myeloid malignancies associated with poor outcomes. Studies carried out in the last years have in part elucidated the complex role played by TP53 mutations in the pathogenesis of these myeloid disorders and in the mechanisms of drug resistance. A consistent number of studies has shown that some molecular parameters, such as the presence of a single or multiple TP53 mutations, the presence of concomitant TP53 deletions, the association with co-occurring mutations, the clonal size of TP53 mutations, the involvement of a single (monoallelic) or of both TP53 alleles (biallelic) and the cytogenetic architecture of concomitant chromosome abnormalities are major determinants of outcomes of patients. The limited response of these patients to standard treatments, including induction chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents and venetoclax-based therapies and the discovery of an immune dysregulation have induced a shift to new emerging therapies, some of which being associated with promising efficacy. The main aim of these novel immune and nonimmune strategies consists in improving survival and in increasing the number of TP53-mutated MDS/AML patients in remission amenable to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

AML classification in the year 2023: How to avoid a Babylonian confusion of languages

In parallel to the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO 2022), an alternative International Consensus Classification (ICC) has been proposed. To evaluate the impact of the new classifications on AML diagnoses and ELN-based risk classification, we analyzed 717 MDS and 734 AML non-therapy-related patients diagnosed according to the revised 4th WHO edition (WHO 2017) by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing. In both new classifications, the purely morphologically defined AML entities decreased from 13% to 5%. Myelodysplasia-related (MR) AML increased from 22% to 28% (WHO 2022) and 26% (ICC). Other genetically-defined AML remained the largest group, and the abandoned AML-RUNX1 was mainly reclassified as AML-MR (WHO 2022: 77%; ICC: 96%). Different inclusion criteria of AML-CEBPA and AML-MR (i.a. exclusion of TP53 mutated cases according to ICC) were associated with differences in overall survival. In conclusion, both classifications focus on more genetics-based definitions with similar basic concepts and a large degree of agreement. The remaining non-comparability (e.g., TP53 mutated AML) needs additional studies to definitely answer open questions on disease categorization in an unbiased way.

Updates in molecular genetics of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a type of cancer caused by aggressive neoplastic proliferations of immature myeloid cells that is fatal if untreated. AML accounts for 1.0% of all new cancer cases in the United States, with a 5-year relative survival rate of 30.5%. Once defined primarily morphologically, advances in next generational sequencing have expanded the role of molecular genetics in categorizing the disease. As such, both the World Health Organization Classification of Haematopoietic Neoplasms and The International Consensus Classification System now define a variety of AML subsets based on mutations in driver genes such as NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. This article provides an overview of some of the genetic mutations associated with AML and compares how the new classification systems incorporate molecular genetics into the definition of AML.

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms: evolving guidelines in the molecular era with practical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There have been major advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, which prompt the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of World Health Organization Classification (WHO-5) and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two classification systems for myeloid neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many myeloid entities have been refined in WHO-5 and ICC with improved understanding of morphology and integration of new genetic findings. Particularly, molecular and cytogenetic studies have been increasingly incorporated into the classification, risk stratification, and selection of therapy of myeloid neoplasms. Overall, despite some revisions and discrepancies between WHO-5 and ICC, the major categories of myeloid neoplasms remain the same. Further validation studies are warranted to fine-tune and, ideally, integrate these two classifications.

SUMMARY

Integration of clinical information, laboratory parameters, morphologic features, and cytogenetic and molecular studies is essential for the classification of myeloid neoplasms, as recommended by both WHO-5 and ICC.

Comparison of the International Consensus and 5th WHO edition classifications of adult myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia

Several editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of lympho-hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008, and 2016 served as the international standard for diagnosis. Since the 4th WHO edition, here referred as WHO-HAEM4, significant clinico-pathological, immunophenotypic, and molecular advances have been made in the field of myeloid neoplasms, which have contributed to refine diagnostic criteria, to upgrade entities previously defined as provisional and to identify new entities. This process has resulted in two recent classification proposals of myeloid neoplasms: the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5). In this paper, we review and compare the two classifications in terms of diagnostic criteria and entity definition, with a focus on adult myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The goal is to provide a tool to facilitate the work of pathologists, hematologists and researchers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of these hematological malignancies.

[WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 2022 (5th edition): Myeloid and Histiocytic Tumors]

The article reviews the changes in the structure of classification, diagnostic criteria for myeloid and histiocytic neoplasms in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues (2022). Information is presented regarding new nosological forms, renaming and abolition of some previously existing ones. The importance of molecular genetic studies in the isolation of myeloid and histiocytic neoplasms and the need to apply these studies in clinical practice are emphasized. Myeloid and histiocytic precancerous and proliferative processes, genetic tumor syndromes, introduced into the classification for the first time, are considered.

The International Consensus Classification of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) are overlapping hematological neoplasms associated with rapid onset, progressive, and frequently chemo-resistant disease. At diagnosis, classification and risk stratification are critical for treatment decisions. A group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of acute leukemias. One of the major changes includes elimination of AML with myelodysplasia-related changes group, while creating new categories of AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities, AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations, and AML with mutated TP53. Most of recurrent genetic abnormalities, including mutations in NPM1, that define specific subtypes of AML have a lower requirement of ≥ 10% blasts in the bone marrow or blood, and a new category of MDS/AML is created for other case types with 10-19% blasts. Prior therapy, antecedent myeloid neoplasms or underlying germline genetic disorders predisposing to the development of AML are now recommended as qualifiers to the initial diagnosis of AML. With these changes, classification of AML is updated to include evolving genetic, clinical, and morphologic findings.

The new diagnostic criteria for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia is useful for predicting clinical outcome: comparison of the 4th and 5th World Health Organization classifications

Mutations in myelodysplasia-related (MR) genes, rather than morphological features, have been included in the diagnostic criteria of the new 5th World Health Organization (WHO) classification for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-associated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study compares the clinical relevance of the new criteria with those of the previous version. In a cohort of 135 patients with newly diagnosed AML, the MDS-related AML patients were classified according to the 5th and 4th edition of the WHO classification (AML, myelodysplasia-related [AML-MR^5th] and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes [AML-MRC^4th], respectively). The median age of the patients was 70.4 years. MR gene mutations were found in 48 patients (35.6%). Sixty-one patients (46.6%) were diagnosed with AML-MRC^4th, while 71 patients (53.0%) were diagnosed with AML-MR^5th. Patients with AML-MR^5th were significantly older with significantly lower treatment response rate, higher recurrence rate, and shorter relapse-free survival after chemotherapy, whereas AML-MRC^4th patients did not show any association with the treatment outcome. Overall, the following prognostic factors for survival were identified: age over 75 years, antecedent MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm, chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities, and KRAS and ZSZR2 mutations. The 5th WHO classification is more useful for predicting the treatment response of patients with AML-MR than the previous version. Among the MR genes, ZSZR2 mutations were found to be independent prognostic factors affecting survival.

Screening a Targeted Panel of Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing Improves Risk Stratification in Real World Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Simple Summary

In this study, we prospectively analyzed a cohort of 268 newly diagnosed AML patients with the objective of assessing the clinical value of screening a targeted gene panel by next-generation sequencing (NGS). We found that access to NGS data refined risk assessment for 62 patients, corresponding to approximately 23% of the study population. We further compared clinical outcomes with prognostic stratification, and observed unexpected results associated with mutations in the FLT3 gene, highlighting the need for further improvements in current risk classification criteria.

Abstract

Although mutation profiling of defined genes is recommended for classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, screening of targeted gene panels using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not always routinely used as standard of care. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess whether extended molecular monitoring using NGS adds clinical value for risk assessment in real-world AML patients. We analyzed a cohort of 268 newly diagnosed AML patients. We compared the prognostic stratification of our study population according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations, before and after the incorporation of the extended mutational profile information obtained by NGS. Without access to NGS data, 63 patients (23%) failed to be stratified into risk groups. After NGS data, only 27 patients (10%) failed risk stratification. Another 33 patients were re-classified as adverse-risk patients once the NGS data was incorporated. In total, access to NGS data refined risk assessment for 62 patients (23%). We further compared clinical outcomes with prognostic stratification, and observed unexpected outcomes associated with FLT3 mutations. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the prognostic utility of screening AML patients for multiple gene mutations by NGS and underscores the need for further studies to refine the current risk classification criteria.

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms

The upcoming 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours is part of an effort to hierarchically catalogue human cancers arising in various organ systems within a single relational database. This paper summarizes the new WHO classification scheme for myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms and provides an overview of the principles and rationale underpinning changes from the prior edition. The definition and diagnosis of disease types continues to be based on multiple clinicopathologic parameters, but with refinement of diagnostic criteria and emphasis on therapeutically and/or prognostically actionable biomarkers. While a genetic basis for defining diseases is sought where possible, the classification strives to keep practical worldwide applicability in perspective. The result is an enhanced, contemporary, evidence-based classification of myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms, rooted in molecular biology and an organizational structure that permits future scalability as new discoveries continue to inexorably inform future editions.