Diagnostic Utility of UroVysion Combined With Conventional Urinary Cytology for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract

[New edition of the Paris classification 2022: What is new?]

As an internationally accepted diagnostic system, the Paris classification has achieved a global breakthrough in the standardization of diagnoses in urine cytology. Based on experience over the past few years since its first publication, the new edition of the Paris classification refines the diagnostic criteria and discusses diagnostic pitfalls. While the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma remains the main focus, other aspects of urine cytology, including cytology of the upper urinary tract and the associated challenges, have also been addressed. Low-grade urothelial neoplasia is no longer listed as a separate category but is now included in the category "negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" (NGHUC). Essentially, the Paris classification provides an important basis for estimating the risk of malignancy and further clinical management.

Utility of The Paris System (TPS) for upper urinary tract cytopathology: correlation with histology follow-up and UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Paris System (TPS) provides a uniform reporting system of urine cytology based on well-defined cytologic criteria. Due to their rarity, there are limited data on the utility of TPS in upper urinary tract (UUT) lesions and follow-up histology of cases with abnormal cytology. We aimed to evaluate the utility of TPS for UUT lesions by correlating the cytologic diagnoses using TPS criteria with subsequent histology. Additionally, the diagnostic utility of UroVysion (Abbott) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 148 UUT cytology specimens were retrospectively identified (2018-2022). Cytologic interpretation was performed using TPS, and then correlated with the findings of concurrent or subsequent histologic specimens. The performance of UroVysion FISH was analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) were determined.

RESULTS

Among 83 patients who had concurrent or subsequent histologic specimens, cyto-histologic discrepancy was seen in 7 cases (8.4%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV using TPS criteria for detecting HGUC were 87%, and 92%, 96.4%, and 73%, respectively. UroVysion FISH was performed in 21 patients with atypical cytologic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of UroVysion for detecting HGUC was 75% and 86%, respectively, while PPV and NPV were 86% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the application of TPS criteria for reporting upper urinary cytology was reliable at detecting UUT lesions, especially HGUC. UroVysion FISH was a valuable ancillary test for detecting HGUC of UUT.

Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Cytologic evaluation of the upper urinary tract (UUT) can be challenging due to instrumentation artefacts. This study retrospectively reviewed UUT specimens using The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology, second edition (TPS 2.0), compared it with the original reporting system (ORS) and correlated it with histopathologic follow-up.

METHODS

An institutional database was reviewed for the UUT biopsy/resection histopathologic specimens, and we included 52 UUT cytology specimens pertinent to these cases in the study. These specimens were blindly reviewed and reclassified using TPS 2.0. The correlation between TPS 2.0, ORS and histopathologic follow-up was assessed.

RESULTS

The UUT cytology specimens corresponded to 21 (40.4%) high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), 27 (51.9%) low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC) and 4 (7.7%) benign cases on follow-up. For HGGC cases, the associated TPS categories included unsatisfactory (n = 1, 4.8%), negative for HGUC (NHGUC; n = 3, 14.3%), atypical urothelial cells (AUC; n = 6, 28.6%), suspicious for HGUC (SHGUC; n = 3, 14.3%) and HGUC (n = 8, 38.1%), while ORS categorised the specimens as unsatisfactory (n = 1, 4.8%), negative for malignant cells (NFMC; n = 3, 14.3%), AUC (n = 5, 23.8%), low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC; n = 0, 0%), SHGUC (n = 5, 23.8%) and HGUC (n = 7, 33.3%). The risks of high-grade malignancy among cytologic categories were similar between ORS and TPS (p > 0.05). The majority of LGUC were classified as AUC similarly by ORS and TPS (55.6% vs. 59.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated comparable performance between TPS 2.0 and ORS for UUT cytology specimens. Cytological diagnosis of UUT specimens remains challenging, especially for LGUC.

New Perspectives on the Role of Liquid Biopsy in Bladder Cancer: Applicability to Precision Medicine

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common tumors in the world. Cystoscopy and tissue biopsy are the standard methods in screening and early diagnosis of suspicious bladder lesions. However, they are invasive procedures that may cause pain and infectious complications. Considering the limitations of both procedures, and the recurrence and resistance to BC treatment, it is necessary to develop a new non-invasive methodology for early diagnosis and multiple evaluations in patients under follow-up for bladder cancer. In recent years, liquid biopsy has proven to be a very useful diagnostic tool for the detection of tumor biomarkers. This non-invasive technique makes it possible to analyze single tumor components released into the peripheral circulation and to monitor tumor progression. Numerous biomarkers are being studied and interesting clinical applications for these in BC are being presented, with promising results in early diagnosis, detection of microscopic disease, and prediction of recurrence and response to treatment.

Examining longitudinal markers of bladder cancer recurrence through a semiautonomous machine learning system for quantifying specimen atypia from urine cytology

BACKGROUND

Urine cytology is generally considered the primary approach for screening for recurrence of bladder cancer. However, it is currently unclear how best to use cytological examinations for assessment and early detection of recurrence, beyond identifying a positive finding that requires more invasive methods to confirm recurrence and decide on therapeutic options. Because screening programs are frequent, and can be burdensome, finding quantitative means to reduce this burden for patients, cytopathologists, and urologists is an important endeavor and can improve both the efficiency and reliability of findings. Additionally, identifying ways to risk-stratify patients is crucial for improving quality of life while reducing the risk of future recurrence or progression of the cancer.

METHODS

In this study, a computational machine learning tool, AutoParis-X, was leveraged to extract imaging features from urine cytology examinations longitudinally to study the predictive potential of urine cytology for assessing recurrence risk. This study examined how the significance of imaging predictors changes over time before and after surgery to determine which predictors and time periods are most relevant for assessing recurrence risk.

RESULTS

Results indicate that imaging predictors extracted using AutoParis-X can predict recurrence as well or better than traditional cytological/histological assessments alone and that the predictiveness of these features is variable across time, with key differences in overall specimen atypia identified immediately before tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research will clarify how computational methods can be effectively used in high-volume screening programs to improve recurrence detection and complement traditional modes of assessment.

Diagnostic value of Xpert® BC Detection, Bladder Epicheck®, Urovysion® FISH and cytology in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Following the current guidelines, diagnosis and staging for upper urinary tract tumours (UTUC) can be performed with Computed Tomography, urography, ureterorenoscopy (URS) and selective cytology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Xpert®-BC-Detection and the Bladder-Epicheck®-test in the detection of UTUC and compare it with cytology and the Urovysion®-FISH test using histology and URS as gold standard.

METHODS

A total of 97 analyses were collected through selective catheterization of the ureter before URS to test for cytology, Xpert®-BC-Detection, Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®-FISH. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using histology results/URS as reference.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 41.9% for cytology, 64.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 87.1% for Urovysion®-FISH. The sensitivity of Xpert®-BC-Detection was 100% in both, LG and HG tumours, sensitivity of cytology increased from 30.8% in LG to 100% in HG, for Bladder-Epicheck® from 57.7% in LG to 100% in HG and of Urovysion®-FISH from 84.6% in LG to 100% in HG tumours. Specificity was 4.5% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 93.9% for cytology, 78.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 81.8% for Urovysion®-FISH. PPV was 33% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 76.5% for cytology, 58.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 69.2% for Urovysion®FISH. NPV was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 77.5% for cytology, 82.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 93.1% for Urovysion®FISH.

CONCLUSION

Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®FISH along with cytology could be a helpful ancillary method in the diagnosis and follow-up of UTUC while due to its low specificity Xpert®-BC Detection seems to be of limited usefulness.

Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: State of the art and future perspectives

Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. Cystoscopy represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of suspicious bladder lesions. However, the procedure is invasive and burdened by pain, discomfort and infective complications. Cytology, which represents an alternative diagnostic possibility is limited by poor sensitivity. Considering the limitations of both procedures, and the necessity to perform multiple evaluations in patients who are in follow-up for bladder cancer, an improved non-invasive methodology is required in the clinical management of this disease. Liquid biopsy, e.g. the detection of clinical biomarkers in urine, represent a promising novel and non-invasive approach that could overcome those limitations and be integrated into the current clinical practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the state of the art of this approach and the latest novelties regarding detection, prognosis and surveillance of bladder cancer.

"Indeterminate" UroVysion Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results

OBJECTIVES

UroVysion cases with one to three abnormal cells that do not meet the threshold for positivity may be better classified as "indeterminate." The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and clinical significance of these indeterminate UroVysion results.

METHODS

The UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results over a 4-year period in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up of the initial UroVysion cases, including urine cytology or bladder biopsy performed within 12 months of the initial diagnosis of the result, was obtained from pathology reports.

RESULTS

A significant fraction (178 of 1,907, 9.3%) of the UroVysion cases had indeterminate results. Overall, the subsequent malignancy rate of the group with indeterminate UroVysion results (14 of 59, 23.7%) was higher than the group with normal results (48 of 319, 15.0%), although the difference was not significant (P = .124). For patients without a history of urinary tract neoplasm, the subsequent malignancy rate in the group with indeterminate results (7 of 18, 38.9%) was significantly higher than the group with normal results (16 of 103, 15.5%) (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support that indeterminate UroVysion FISH result may warrant closer clinical follow-up in patients without a history of urinary tract neoplasm. We suggest reporting these cases as "aneusomy of undetermined significance."

UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization in urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review and future perspectives

The number of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) is high, with a corresponding demand for detecting UC easily and non-invasively. Cystoscopy and urine cytology, with widely known diagnostic accuracies, are the gold standards for identifying UC originating from the bladder. However, cystoscopy or other tests, such as ureteroscopy or retrograde pyelography, are uncomfortable for patients. Tests for urinary biomarkers are expected to satisfy the demand for less invasive tests that will benefit patients with anxiety for invasive tests such as cystoscopy or ureteroscopy. Although several urinary biomarkers have been reported to support the diagnosis or follow-up of UC, their use in the clinic is uncommon. The UroVysion test examines urinary biomarkers using a multitarget, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. The test uses exfoliated cells found in urine and is a mixture of centromeric fluorescent denatured chromosome enumeration probes for chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 (labelled stratum red, spectrum green and spectrum aqua, respectively), and a locus-specific identifier probe for 9p21 (spectrum gold). It is used for the initial diagnosis of patients with hematuria or the monitoring of patients previously diagnosed with bladder cancer. Almost 20 years have passed since UroVysion was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and so this is a well-established test. However, room exists for further research, with numerous reports on this test having been recently published. In order to update our knowledge, we herein present a brief overview of UroVysion and its features that follows the latest findings as they relate to UC.

Long-term ureteroscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 28-year single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo endoscopic management of non-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma remain uncertain. The longest mean follow-up period in previous studies was 6.1 years. This study reports the long-term outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent ureteroscopic ablation at a single institution over a 28-year period.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent ureteroscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma as their primary treatment at our institution between January 1991 and April 2011. Survival outcomes, including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, upper-tract recurrence-free survival and renal unit survival, were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients underwent endoscopic management, with a mean age at diagnosis of 66 years. All patients underwent ureteroscopy, and biopsy-confirmed pathology was obtained. Median (range; mean) follow-up was 11.7 (2.3-20.9, 11.9) years. Upper tract recurrence occurred in 87% (n = 13) of patients. Twenty percent (n = 3) of patients proceeded to nephroureterectomy. The estimated cancer-specific survival rate was 93% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. Estimated overall survival rates were 86, 80, 54 and 20% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. Only one patient experienced cancer-specific mortality. The estimated mean and median overall survival times were 14.5 and 16.6 years, respectively. The estimated mean cancer-specific survival time was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Although upper tract recurrence is common, endoscopic management of non-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma provides a 90% cancer-specific survival rate at 20 years in selected patients.

Urinary Biomarkers In Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer has a very high frequency of recurrence and therefore requires close clinical surveillance throughout its life, with cystoscopies and serial cytological examinations. These tests are both invasive and expensive, with considerable interpersonal and inter-institutional variability. Moreover, cytological examination used for the diagnosis of low-grade tumors has a low sensitivity; thus, there is an increasing focus on the research for new, accurate, urinary markers. Herein, the biological basis, methodologies, and diagnostic performance of biomarkers are discussed.

UroVysion® predicts intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UCUUT) is common. One of the mechanisms driving this is the implantation of cancer cells from the UCUUT at the RNUs. Therefore, their detection after RNU can assist in predicting IVR. This study aimed to examine the utility of UroVysion^® as a tool for predicting bladder recurrence after RNU for UCUUT.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 65 patients who received RNU for high-grade UCUUT between October 2013 and April 2017.

RESULTS

Of the 65 patients, 54 (83.1%) who had both bladder urine samples available immediately after RNU (0 postoperative days: POD) and 5 days after RNU (5POD) were selected. We performed UroVysion^® and cytology. Twenty-two patients showed IVR with 32 foci. UroVysion^® results at 0POD (26 patients, 48.1%) and/or 5POD (31 patients, 57.4%) were positive in 42 (77.8%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UroVysion^® for included cases were measured for both 0POD and 5POD samples; they were determined to be 95.5% (21/22), 34.4% (11/32), 50.0% (21/42), and 91.7% (11/12), respectively. For cytology, these values were 75.0% (15/20), 52.9% (18/34), 48.4% (15/31), and 78.3% (18/23), respectively. Forty-two (64.6%) patients who were UroVysion^®-positive demonstrated IVR. The IVR rate between the group positive for either 0POD or 5POD and that negative for both significantly differed for both UroVysion^® (p = 0.019) and cytology (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Multiple urine tests using UroVysion^® after RNU could be a useful predictor for IVR.

[Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma]

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare entity. The incidence in Germany is approximately 2/100,000 with a ratio between women and men of 1:2.5. Most clinical signs are nonspecific, which is why early diagnosis is rarely successful. Computed tomography urography in combination with diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is currently the gold standard in the diagnostics of UTUC. Regarding surgical treatment, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with resection of a bladder cuff remains the method of choice, although the radical approach is developing towards laparoscopic/robotic or endourological procedures with preservation of kidney tissue. Due to the high recurrence rate (22-47%) of urothelial carcinoma inside the bladder, close follow-up after RNU is mandatory.

A review of upper urinary tract cytology performance before and after the implementation of The Paris System

Urinary cytology (UC) is one of the primary diagnostic modalities used for the screening and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma. Despite its widespread use, UC has suffered from a lack of standardized or reproducible criteria and wide interobserver variability, particularly of the designation of atypical urothelial cells. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), published in 2016, aimed to provide a standardized approach for evaluating UC by creating diagnostic categories with specific cytomorphologic criteria. Recent studies have primarily investigated the application of TPS on lower urinary tract specimens and have mostly shown that TPS implementation has improved the performance of UC specimens. Only a few studies have reported the impact of TPS on upper urinary tract (UUT) cytology. Additionally, there is uncertainty as to which cytological features are most predictive of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in the UUT. This review summarizes the literature regarding the utility and performance of UUT cytology and highlights findings before and after the implementation of TPS.

A review of urinary cytology in the setting of upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UUT) are uncommon. Cytological examination of voided urine or washings from the UUT has been part of the standard workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, its value remains controversial. The lack of uniform terminology and specific diagnostic criteria could also have contributed to the inferior performance of urinary cytology for detecting UTUC. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) has provided a standardized reporting system for urinary cytology specimens with clearly defined cytomorphologic diagnostic criteria and found acceptance on an international level after its implementation in 2016. Recent studies have shown that TPS has led to improved diagnostic performance of urinary cytology; however, most of these studies had focused on the evaluation of lower urinary tract cytology specimens. Only a limited number of new research studies have analyzed the effect of TPS when applied to UUT cytology specimens. In the present report, we have summarized the current understanding and utility of UTUC, including its molecular biology, and reviewed the current literature.

CK20 versus AMACR and p53 immunostains in evaluation of Urothelial Carcinoma in Situ and Reactive Atypia

Ancillary testing with immunohistochemistry has shown recent promise in the workup of equivocal bladder lesions. We read with interest the recent findings of Alston et al., who assessed the diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in comparison to cytokeratin 20 (CK20) in evaluation of atypia in challenging flat urothelial lesions in the differential between carcinoma in situ (CIS) and reactive atypia. AMACR was reported to be a somewhat more specific but less sensitive marker for CIS than CK20, though showing weaker intensity. Spurred by their report, with the knowledge that we had consistently and consecutively performed AMACR, CK20, and p53 on flat urothelial lesions challenging enough to reach intradepartmental consensus, we performed a retrospective review. Similarly, we found that AMACR was less sensitive (80%) and more specific (100%) than CK20, with the same caveat of less staining intensity. Additionally, our p53 review identified a significant rate (~ 27%) of equivocal/non-informative findings. Taken together, our experience in this consecutive cohort confirms the impression of Alston et al. regarding the utility and challenges of AMACR use, while highlighting challenges with p53, which we plan to use more sparingly prospectively.