1
|
Stefanizzi P, Moscara L, Palmieri C, Martinelli A, Di Lorenzo A, Venerito V, Germinario CA, Tafuri S. Safety profile of recombinant adjuvanted anti-herpes zoster vaccine (RZV) in high-risk groups: Data from active surveillance program. Puglia (Italy), 2021-23. Vaccine 2024; 42:2966-2974. [PMID: 38582693 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2021 a recombinant adjuvanted anti-Herpes Zoster vaccine(Recombinant Zoster Vaccine, RZV) is offered in Italy to high-risk patients. Few real-life data about RZV safety are available in target populations. OBJECTIVES This study investigates Adverse Events Following Immunization(AEFIs), baseline disease flare-ups, and Herpes Zoster (HZ) episodes occurring after RZV administration in a heterogeneous population of fragile patients to design its safety profile. METHODS This is a retrospective population-based study. RZV-vaccinated patients at Bari Policlinico General Hospital vaccination clinic from October 1st, 2021, to March 31st, 2023, were enrolled. Subjects were screened for reason of RZV eligibility and baseline chronic pathologies. AEFIs occurred in the first 7-days post-vaccination period were collected, and baseline disease flare-ups and post-vaccination HZ episodes were assessed via a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS Five-hundred-thirty-eight patients were included and total of 1,031 doses were administered. Most patients were vaccinated due to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy(54.65 %); onco-hematological and cardiovascular conditions were the most common chronic baseline pathologies. Out of 1,031 follow-ups, 441 AEFI cases were reported(42.7/100). The most common symptoms were injection site pain/itching(35.60/100), asthenia/malaise(11.44/100), and fever (10.09/100). Four serious AEFIs occurred(0.38/100). Older age, male sex, and history of cardiovascular diseases(OR:0.71; 95CI:0.52-0.98; p-value <0.05) were found to decrease AEFIs risk, while endocrine-metabolic illnesses(OR:1.61; 95CI:1.15-2.26; p-value <0.05) increased it. Twelve patients(2.23 %) reported a flare-up/worsening of their baseline chronic condition within the first three months after vaccination(mean interval 31.75 days, range 0-68 days). Patients with rheumatological illnesses had a higher risk of relapse(OR:16.56; 95CI:3.58-76.56; p-value <0.001), while male sex behaved as a protective factor. Twelve patients who completed the vaccination cycle(2.43%) had at least one HZ episode by the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates RZV safety in a significant number of high-risk patients. Hence, RZV should be actively offered as part of tailored vaccination programs to decrease the burden of HZ in fragile populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
| | - Lorenza Moscara
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Claudia Palmieri
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Martinelli
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Lorenzo
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Venerito
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Cinzia Annatea Germinario
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parikh R, Singer D, Chmielewski-Yee E, Dessart C. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant zoster vaccine: A review of real-world evidence. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2263979. [PMID: 37967254 PMCID: PMC10653743 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2263979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was licensed in the US for prevention of herpes zoster (HZ) in 2017. We conducted a literature search (January 1, 2017-August 1, 2023) using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to consolidate the real-world evidence related to RZV. Overall, RZV effectiveness against HZ was high across the studied populations in real-world settings, including adults aged ≥ 50 years and patients aged ≥ 18 years with immunodeficiency or immunosuppression. Effectiveness was higher with two doses versus one dose, especially in elderly people and immunocompromised individuals. The safety profile of RZV was broadly consistent with that established in clinical trials. RZV does not appear to increase the risk of disease flares in patients with immune-mediated diseases. Approximately two-thirds of individuals received a second RZV dose within 2-6 months after the first dose. Collectively, RZV effectiveness against HZ was high, and these real-world studies reaffirm its favorable benefit-risk profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Singer
- US Health Outcomes and Epidemiology, GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gómez Marco JJ, Martín Martín S, Aldaz Herce P, Javierre Miranda AP, Sánchez Hernández C. [Vaccination against the herpes zoster virus]. Aten Primaria 2023; 55:102710. [PMID: 37573820 PMCID: PMC10428030 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the latest published evidence on the vaccine used in our country against the herpes zoster virus, breaking down the results according to the efficacy, efficiency, effectiveness and safety of the vaccine. Include the current recommendations for vaccination. DESIGN Secondary review. Descriptive qualitative review. Review using the search term "herpes zoster vaccine" and "Adjuvanted recombinant Herpes Zoster subunit vaccine". Retrospective observational study. DATA SOURCES Embase, Medline and Google Scholar. Selection of studies Search criterion with the terms "Shingrix vaccine" and "Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine". Search period 2013-2023. Studies classified as clinical trials or randomized clinical trials were selected. 21 published studies were evaluated. There were no exclusions. RESULTS The evaluated studies were found to be coherent and in all of them efficacy in adult individuals in preventing viral reactivation and in preventing complications was higher than 80%. The effectiveness of the vaccine after two doses was also higher than 80%. Cost-effectiveness studies were always favourable in adults, immunodepressed patients and individuals with chronic pathology. The safety of the vaccine was evaluated in the pivotal studies and in the post-commercialization studies that were undertaken (although there were few of the latter due to the short period of time studied). The safety profile of the vaccine is very high and in the case of severe adverse effects, their frequency was similar to that of a placebo. CONCLUSIONS We have a safe and effective vaccine against the herpes zoster virus that allows us to protect the most vulnerable population groups against this virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Javier Gómez Marco
- Grupo de prevención de enfermedades infecciosas del PAPPS; CSU Las Calesas, SERMAS, Madrid, España
| | - Susana Martín Martín
- Grupo de prevención de enfermedades infecciosas del PAPPS; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud de Balmaseda, Vizcaya, OSI Ezkerraldea-Enkarterri-Cruces, Osakidetza-Servicio Vasco de Salud, Balmaseda, Vizcaya, España
| | - Pablo Aldaz Herce
- Grupo de prevención de enfermedades infecciosas del PAPPS; Centro de Salud de San Juan, Pamplona, Navarra, España.
| | - Ana Pilar Javierre Miranda
- Grupo de prevención de enfermedades infecciosas del PAPPS; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Avenida de Aragón, Madrid, Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS), Madrid, España
| | - Coro Sánchez Hernández
- Grupo de prevención de enfermedades infecciosas del PAPPS; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Virxe Peregrina de Pontevedra, Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS), Pontevedra, España
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katherine Yih W, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure DL, Nelson JC, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. Safety signal identification for COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccination using tree-based scan statistics in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine 2023; 41:5265-5270. [PMID: 37479610 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional active vaccine safety monitoring involves pre-specifying health outcomes and biologically plausible outcome-specific time windows of concern, limiting the adverse events that can be evaluated. In this study, we used tree-based scan statistics to look broadly for >60,000 possible adverse events after bivalent COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS Vaccine Safety Datalink enrollees aged ≥5 years receiving Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine through November 2022 were followed for 56 days post-vaccination. Incident diagnoses in inpatient or emergency department settings were analyzed for clustering within the hierarchical ICD-10-CM diagnosis code "tree" and temporally within post-vaccination follow-up. The conditional self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic was used, conditioning on total number of cases of each diagnosis and total number of cases of any diagnosis occurring during the scanning risk window across the entire tree. P = 0.01 was the pre-specified cut-off for statistical significance. RESULTS Analysis included 352,509 doses of Moderna and 979,189 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent vaccines. After Moderna vaccination, no statistically significant clusters were found. After Pfizer-BioNTech, there were clusters of unspecified adverse events (Days 1-3, p = 0.0001-0.0007), influenza (Days 35-56, p = 0.0001), cough (Days 44-55, p = 0.0002), and COVID-19 (Days 52-56, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS For Pfizer-BioNTech only, we detected clusters of: (1) unspecified adverse effects, as have been observed in other vaccine studies using this method, and (2) respiratory disease toward the end of follow-up. The respiratory clusters were likely due to overlap of follow-up with the spread of respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, and COVID-19, i.e., confounding by seasonality. The untargeted nature of the method and its inherent adjustment for the many diagnoses and risk intervals evaluated are unique advantages. Limitations include susceptibility to time-varying confounding, lower statistical power for assessing risks of specific outcomes than in traditional studies targeting fewer outcomes, and the possibility of missing adverse events not strongly clustered in time or within the "tree."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Katherine Yih
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | | | - Jonathan Duffy
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Bruce Fireman
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - David L McClure
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States
| | - Jennifer C Nelson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Lei Qian
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Ning Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Eric Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Stanley Xu
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Judith C Maro
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suarez EA, Nguyen M, Zhang D, Zhao Y, Stojanovic D, Munoz M, Liedtka J, Anderson A, Liu W, Dashevsky I, Cole D, DeLuccia S, Menzin T, Noble J, Maro JC. Novel methods for pregnancy drug safety surveillance in the FDA Sentinel System. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023; 32:126-136. [PMID: 35871766 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is a priority of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to monitor the safety of medications used during pregnancy. Pregnancy exposure registries and cohort studies utilizing electronic health record data are primary sources of information but are limited by small sample sizes and limited outcome assessment. TreeScan™, a statistical data mining tool, can be applied within the FDA Sentinel System to simultaneously identify multiple potential adverse neonatal and infant outcomes after maternal medication exposure. METHODS We implemented TreeScan using the Sentinel analytic tools in a cohort of linked live birth deliveries and infants nested in the IBM MarketScan® Research Database. As a case study, we compared first trimester fluoroquinolone use and cephalosporin use. We used the Bernoulli and Poisson TreeScan statistics with compatible propensity score-based study designs for confounding control (matching and stratification) and used multiple propensity score models with various strategies for confounding control to inform best practices. We developed a hierarchical outcome tree including major congenital malformations and outcomes of gestational length and birth weight. RESULTS A total of 1791 fluoroquinolone-exposed and 8739 cephalosporin-exposed mother-infant pairs were eligible for analysis. Both TreeScan analysis methods resulted in single alerts that were deemed to be due to uncontrolled confounding or otherwise not warranting follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In this implementation of TreeScan using Sentinel analytic tools, we did not observe any new safety signals for fluoroquinolone use in the first trimester. TreeScan, with tailored or high-dimensional propensity scores for confounding control, is a valuable tool in addition to current safety surveillance methods for medications used during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Suarez
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Nguyen
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Di Zhang
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yueqin Zhao
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Danijela Stojanovic
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Monica Munoz
- Division of Pharmacovigilance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Jane Liedtka
- Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Abby Anderson
- Division of Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Inna Dashevsky
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Cole
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandra DeLuccia
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Talia Menzin
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Noble
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Judith C Maro
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yih WK, Kulldorff M, Dashevsky I, Maro JC. Sequential Data-Mining for Adverse Events After Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccination Using the Tree-Based Scan Statistic. Am J Epidemiol 2023; 192:276-282. [PMID: 36227263 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Tree-based scan statistics have been successfully used to study the safety of several vaccines without prespecifying health outcomes of concern. In this study, the binomial tree-based scan statistic was applied sequentially to detect adverse events in days 1-28 compared with days 29-56 after recombinant herpes zoster (RZV) vaccination, with 5 looks at the data and formal adjustment for the repeated analyses over time. IBM MarketScan data on commercially insured persons ≥50 years of age receiving RZV during January 1, 2018, to May 5, 2020, were used. With 999,876 doses of RZV included, statistically significant signals were detected only for unspecified adverse effects/complications following immunization, with attributable risks as low as 2 excess cases per 100,000 vaccinations. Ninety percent of cases in the signals occurred in the week after vaccination and, based on previous studies, likely represent nonserious events like fever, fatigue, and headache. Strengths of our study include its untargeted nature, self-controlled design, and formal adjustment for repeated testing. Although the method requires prespecification of the risk window of interest and may miss some true signals detectable using the tree-temporal variant of the method, it allows for early detection of potential safety problems through early initiation of ongoing monitoring.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yih WK, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure D, Nelson J, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. A broad assessment of covid-19 vaccine safety using tree-based data-mining in the vaccine safety datalink. Vaccine 2023; 41:826-835. [PMID: 36535825 PMCID: PMC9755007 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Except for spontaneous reporting systems, vaccine safety monitoring generally involves pre-specifying health outcomes and post-vaccination risk windows of concern. Instead, we used tree-based data-mining to look more broadly for possible adverse events after Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS Vaccine Safety Datalink enrollees receiving ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine in 2020-2021 were followed for 70 days after Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna and 56 days after Janssen vaccination. Incident diagnoses in inpatient or emergency department settings were analyzed for clustering within both the hierarchical ICD-10-CM code structure and the post-vaccination follow-up period. We used the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic and TreeScan software. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate p-values; p = 0.01 was the pre-specified cut-off for statistical significance of a cluster. RESULTS There were 4.1, 2.6, and 0.4 million Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen vaccinees, respectively. Clusters after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination included: (1) unspecified adverse effects, (2) common vaccine reactions, such as fever, myalgia, and headache, (3) myocarditis/pericarditis, and (4) less specific cardiac or respiratory symptoms, all with the strongest clusters generally after Dose 2; and (5) COVID-19/viral pneumonia/sepsis/respiratory failure in the first 3 weeks after Dose 1. Moderna results were similar but without a significant myocarditis/pericarditis cluster. Further investigation suggested the fifth signal group was a manifestation of mRNA vaccine effectiveness after the first 3 weeks. Janssen vaccinees had clusters of unspecified or common vaccine reactions, gait/mobility abnormalities, and muscle weakness. The latter two were deemed to have arisen from confounding related to practices at one site. CONCLUSIONS We detected post-vaccination clusters of unspecified adverse effects, common vaccine reactions, and, for the mRNA vaccines, chest pain and palpitations, as well as myocarditis/pericarditis after Pfizer-BioNTech Dose 2. Unique advantages of this data mining are its untargeted nature and its inherent adjustment for the multiplicity of diagnoses and risk intervals scanned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Katherine Yih
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Jonathan Duffy
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Bruce Fireman
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - David McClure
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States
| | | | - Lei Qian
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Ning Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Eric Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Stanley Xu
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Judith C Maro
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Katherine Yih W, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure D, Nelson J, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. Tree-based data mining for safety assessment of first COVID-19 booster doses in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine 2023; 41:460-466. [PMID: 36481108 PMCID: PMC9684100 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) has been performing safety surveillance for COVID-19 vaccines since their earliest authorization in the United States. Complementing its real-time surveillance for pre-specified health outcomes using pre-specified risk intervals, the VSD conducts tree-based data-mining to look for clustering of a broad range of health outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination. This study's objective was to use this untargeted, hypothesis-generating approach to assess the safety of first booster doses of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and Janssen (Ad26.COV2.S) COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS VSD enrollees receiving a first booster of COVID-19 vaccine through April 2, 2022 were followed for 56 days. Incident diagnoses in inpatient or emergency department settings were analyzed for clustering within both the hierarchical ICD-10-CM code structure and the follow-up period. The self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic was used, conditioning on the total number of cases for each diagnosis. P-values were estimated by Monte Carlo simulation; p = 0.01 was pre-specified as the cut-off for statistical significance of clusters. RESULTS More than 2.4 and 1.8 million subjects received Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna boosters after an mRNA primary series, respectively. Clusters of urticaria/allergy/rash were found during Days 10-15 after the Moderna booster (p = 0.0001). Other outcomes that clustered after mRNA boosters, mostly with p = 0.0001, included unspecified adverse effects, common vaccine-associated reactions like fever and myalgia, and COVID-19. COVID-19 clusters were in Days 1-10 after booster receipt, before boosters would have become effective. There were no noteworthy clusters after boosters following primary Janssen vaccination. CONCLUSIONS In this untargeted data-mining study of COVID-19 booster vaccination, a cluster of delayed-onset urticaria/allergy/rash was detected after the Moderna booster, as has been reported after Moderna vaccination previously. Other clusters after mRNA boosters were of unspecified or common adverse effects and COVID-19, the latter evidently reflecting immunity to COVID-19 after 10 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Katherine Yih
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Jonathan Duffy
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Bruce Fireman
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - David McClure
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States
| | | | - Lei Qian
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Ning Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Eric Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Stanley Xu
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Judith C Maro
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|