Associations of Reservoir-Excess Pressure Parameters Derived From Central and Peripheral Arteries With Kidney Function

Sex-specific associations of reservoir-excess pressure parameters with age and subclinical vascular remodeling

OBJECTIVE

Central artery reservoir pressure and excess pressure (XSP) are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and mortality. However, sex differences in the trajectory of central reservoir pressure and XSP with advancing age and their relations with vascular markers of subclinical CVD risk are incompletely understood. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that central reservoir pressure and XSP would be positively associated with advancing age and vascular markers of subclinical CVD risk in men and women.

METHOD

Healthy adults ( n  = 398; aged 18-80 years, 60% female individuals) had central (carotid) artery pressure waveforms acquired by applanation tonometry. Reservoir pressure and XSP peaks and integrals were derived retrospectively from carotid pressure waveforms using custom written software. Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness (IMT) was measured by ultrasonography, and aortic stiffness was determined from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV).

RESULTS

Reservoir pressure peak, reservoir pressure integral and XSP integral were higher with age in both men and women ( P  < 0.05), whereas XSP peak was lower with age in men ( P  < 0.05). In women, both reservoir pressure peak ( β  = 0.231, P  < 0.01) and reservoir pressure integral ( β  = 0.254, P  < 0.01) were associated with carotid artery IMT, and reservoir pressure peak was associated with cfPWV ( β  = 0.120, P  = 0.02) after adjusting for CVD risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Central artery reservoir pressure and XSP were higher with advancing age in men and women, and reservoir pressure peak was associated with both carotid artery wall thickness and aortic stiffness in women but not men. Central reservoir pressure peak may provide some insight into sex differences in vascular remodeling and subclinical CVD risk with advancing age in healthy adults.

Reservoir Pressure Integral Is Independently Associated With the Reduction in Renal Function in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Arterial hemodynamic parameters derived from reservoir-excess pressure analysis exhibit prognostic utility. Reservoir-excess pressure analysis may provide useful information about an influence of altered hemodynamics on target organ such as the kidneys. We determined whether the parameters derived from the reservoir-excess pressure analysis were associated with the reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate in 542 older adults (69.4±7.9 years, 194 females) at baseline and after 3 years.

METHODS

Reservoir-excess pressure parameters, including reservoir pressure integral, excess pressure integral, systolic, and diastolic rate constants, were obtained by radial artery tonometry.

RESULTS

After 3 years, and in a group of 94 individuals (72.4±7.6 years, 26 females), there was an estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction of >5% per year (median reduction of 20.5% over 3 years). A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that higher baseline reservoir pressure integral was independently associated with a smaller reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate after accounting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors and study centers (odds ratio: 0.660 [95% CIs, 0.494-0.883]; P=0.005). The association remained unchanged after further adjustments for potential confounders and baseline renal function (odds ratio: 0.528 [95% CIs, 0.351-0.794]; P=0.002). No other reservoir-excess pressure parameters exhibited associations with the reduction in renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that baseline reservoir pressure integral was associated with the decline in renal function in older adults at 3-year follow-up, independently of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. This suggests that reservoir pressure integral may play a role in the functional decline of the kidneys.

Physiological and clinical insights from reservoir-excess pressure analysis

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that reservoir-excess pressure model parameters provide physiological and clinical insights above and beyond standard blood pressure (BP) and pulse waveform analysis. This information has never been collectively examined and was the aim of this review. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with BP as the greatest cardiovascular disease risk factor. However, brachial systolic and diastolic BP provide limited information on the underlying BP waveform, missing important BP-related cardiovascular risk. A comprehensive analysis of the BP waveform is provided by parameters derived via the reservoir-excess pressure model, which include reservoir pressure, excess pressure, and systolic and diastolic rate constants and Pinfinity. These parameters, derived from the arterial BP waveform, provide information on the underlying arterial physiology and ventricular-arterial interactions otherwise missed by conventional BP and waveform indices. Application of the reservoir-excess pressure model in the clinical setting may facilitate a better understanding and earlier identification of cardiovascular dysfunction associated with disease. Indeed, reservoir-excess pressure parameters have been associated with sub-clinical markers of end-organ damage, cardiac and vascular dysfunction, and future cardiovascular events and mortality beyond conventional risk factors. In the future, greater understanding is needed on how the underlying physiology of the reservoir-excess pressure parameters informs cardiovascular disease risk prediction over conventional BP and waveform indices. Additional consideration should be given to the application of the reservoir-excess pressure model in clinical practice using new technologies embedded into conventional BP assessment methods.

Reservoir-Excess Pressure Parameters Independently Predict Cardiovascular Events in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

[Figure: see text].

Excess pressure as an analogue of blood flow velocity

INTRODUCTION

Derivation of blood flow velocity from a blood pressure waveform is a novel technique, which could have potential clinical importance. Excess pressure, calculated from the blood pressure waveform via the reservoir-excess pressure model, is purported to be an analogue of blood flow velocity but this has never been examined in detail, which was the aim of this study.

METHODS

Intra-arterial blood pressure was measured sequentially at the brachial and radial arteries via fluid-filled catheter simultaneously with blood flow velocity waveforms recorded via Doppler ultrasound on the contralateral arm (n = 98, aged 61 ± 10 years, 72% men). Excess pressure was derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms using pressure-only reservoir-excess pressure analysis.

RESULTS

Brachial and radial blood flow velocity waveform morphology were closely approximated by excess pressure derived from their respective sites of measurement (median cross-correlation coefficient r = 0.96 and r = 0.95 for brachial and radial comparisons, respectively). In frequency analyses, coherence between blood flow velocity and excess pressure was similar for brachial and radial artery comparisons (brachial and radial median coherence = 0.93 and 0.92, respectively). Brachial and radial blood flow velocity pulse heights were correlated with their respective excess pressure pulse heights (r = 0.53, P < 0.001 and r = 0.43, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Excess pressure is an analogue of blood flow velocity, thus affording the opportunity to derive potentially important information related to arterial blood flow using only the blood pressure waveform.