Blood Pressure Variability and Cognitive Decline: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Trial

Hypertension, Neurodegeneration, and Cognitive Decline

Elevated blood pressure is a well-established risk factor for age-related cognitive decline. Long linked to cognitive impairment on vascular bases, increasing evidence suggests a potential association of hypertension with the neurodegenerative pathology underlying Alzheimer disease. Hypertension is well known to disrupt the structural and functional integrity of the cerebral vasculature. However, the mechanisms by which these alterations lead to brain damage, enhance Alzheimer pathology, and promote cognitive impairment remain to be established. Furthermore, critical questions concerning whether lowering blood pressure by antihypertensive medications prevents cognitive impairment have not been answered. Recent developments in neurovascular biology, brain imaging, and epidemiology, as well as new clinical trials, have provided insights into these critical issues. In particular, clinical and basic findings on the link between neurovascular dysfunction and the pathobiology of neurodegeneration have shed new light on the overlap between vascular and Alzheimer pathology. In this review, we will examine the progress made in the relationship between hypertension and cognitive impairment and, after a critical evaluation of the evidence, attempt to identify remaining knowledge gaps and future research directions that may advance our understanding of one of the leading health challenges of our time.

A Non-Coronary, Peripheral Arterial Atherosclerotic Disease (Carotid, Renal, Lower Limb) in Elderly Patients-A Review PART II-Pharmacological Approach for Management of Elderly Patients with Peripheral Atherosclerotic Lesions outside Coronary Territory

BACKGROUND

Aging is a key risk factor for atherosclerosis progression that is associated with increased incidence of ischemic events in supplied organs, including stroke, coronary events, limb ischemia, or renal failure. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and major disability in adults ≥ 75 years of age. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease affects everyday activity, quality of life, and it is associated with reduced life expectancy. As most multicenter randomized trials exclude elderly and very elderly patients, particularly those with severe comorbidities, physical or cognitive dysfunctions, frailty, or residence in a nursing home, there is insufficient data on the management of older patients presenting with atherosclerotic lesions outside coronary territory. This results in serious critical gaps in knowledge and a lack of guidance on the appropriate medical treatment. In addition, due to a variety of severe comorbidities in the elderly, the average daily number of pills taken by octogenarians exceeds nine. Polypharmacy frequently results in drug therapy problems related to interactions, drug toxicity, falls with injury, delirium, and non-adherence. Therefore, we have attempted to gather data on the medical treatment in patients with extra-cardiac atherosclerotic lesions indicating where there is some evidence of the management in elderly patients and where there are gaps in evidence-based medicine. Public PubMed databases were searched to review existing evidence on the effectiveness of lipid-lowering, antithrombotic, and new glucose-lowering medications in patients with extra-cardiac atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

Time in target range of systolic blood pressure and cognitive outcomes in patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that fluctuates over time. However, conventional BP control indicators may not adequately reflect the variability of BP during a period of time.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which compared systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets of <120 mmHg (intensive) and <140 mmHg (standard) among patients with hypertension and high cardiac risks. The target ranges were defined as 110 to 130 mmHg in intensive treatment arm and 120 to 140 mmHg in standard treatment arm, respectively. Time in target range (TTR) was calculated based on SBP measurements recorded during the first 3-month follow-up using linear interpolation method. The Fine-Gray competing risk regression models were used to evaluate the association between TTR and cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 7965 patients with the mean (SD) age of 68.0 (9.2) years were included, and 35% were female. Patients with higher TTR were younger, more likely to be male and take <3 BP-lowering agents. Compared to the last quartile, the first quartile of TTR was significantly associated with a higher risk of probable dementia (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.22-2.46; p = 0.002) and the composite of probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03-1.55; p = 0.025). The risk of probable dementia and the composite outcome increased with per quartile decrease of TTR (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30; p = 0.002 and HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00-1.14; p = 0.036). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results after adjusting mean SBP during the first 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of SPRINT data, TTR was independently associated with probable dementia among patients with hypertension, suggesting that TTR could be used as a practical metric of BP control to evaluate the risk of dementia in older adults.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Identifier: NCT01206062.

Heart Rate Variability and Cognition: A Narrative Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

BACKGROUND

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a reliable and convenient method to assess autonomic function. Cross-sectional studies have established a link between HRV and cognition. Longitudinal studies are an emerging area of research with important clinical implications in terms of the predictive value of HRV for future cognition and in terms of the potential causal relationship between HRV and cognition. However, they have not yet been the objective of a systematic review. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the association between HRV and cognition in longitudinal studies.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched from the earliest available date to 26 June 2023. Studies were included if they involved adult human subjects and evaluated the longitudinal association between HRV and cognition. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cohort Studies. The results were presented narratively.

RESULTS

Of 14,359 records screened, 12 studies were included in this systematic review, with a total of 24,390 participants. Two thirds of the studies were published from 2020 onwards. All studies found a longitudinal relationship between HRV and cognition. There was a consistent association between higher parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity and better cognition, and some association between higher sympathetic nervous system activity and worse cognition. Also, higher PNS activity persistently predicted better executive functioning, while data on episodic memory and language were more scant and/or controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the role of HRV as a biomarker of future cognition and, potentially, as a therapeutic target to improve cognition. They will need confirmation by further, more comprehensive studies also including unequivocal non-HRV sympathetic measures and meta-analyses.

Blood Pressure Variability and Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers in the SPRINT Trial

Background

Recent observational studies suggest higher blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau. Less is known about relationships in interventional cohorts with strictly controlled mean BP levels.

Objective

Investigate the longitudinal relationship between BPV and change in plasma AD biomarkers under standard versus intensive BP treatment.

Methods

In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial, 457 participants (n = 206 in standard group, n = 251 in intensive group) underwent repeated BP measurement between baseline and 12-months follow-up, and venipuncture at baseline and median (IQR) 3.5 (3.0-4.0) years later to determine plasma AD biomarkers total tau and Aβ1-42:Aβ1-40 ratio. BPV was calculated as tertiles of variability independent of mean. Linear mixed models investigated the effect of BPV×time on AD biomarker levels.

Results

Higher BPV was associated with increased levels of total tau in the standard group (β [95% CI] 1st versus 3rd tertiles of BPV: 0.21 [0.02, 0.41], p = 0.035), but not in the intensive group (β [95% CI] 1st versus 3rd tertiles of BPV: -0.02 [-0.19, 0.16], p = 0.843). BPV was not associated with Aβ 1-42:Aβ 1-40 ratio in either group. Mean BP was not associated with biomarkers.

Conclusions

Higher BPV was associated with increased plasma total tau under standard BP treatment. Findings add new evidence to prior observational work linking BPV to AD pathophysiology and suggest that, despite strict control of mean BP, BPV remains a risk for pathophysiological change underlying risk for AD.

24-Hour Blood Pressure Variability Via Ambulatory Monitoring and Risk for Probable Dementia in the SPRINT Trial

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for dementia, independent and oftentimes beyond mean blood pressure levels. Recent evidence from interventional cohorts with rigorously controlled mean blood pressure levels suggest blood pressure variability over months to years remains a risk for dementia, but no prior studies have investigated relationships with blood pressure variability over shorter time periods.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial clinical trial.

SETTING

Multisite Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

PARTICIPANTS

793 participants at increased risk for cardiovascular disease and without history of dementia at study randomization.

INTERVENTION

Standard (<140 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) vs intensive (<120 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) lowering of mean blood pressure.

MEASUREMENTS

24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 27 months after treatment randomization (standard vs intensive) and follow-up cognitive testing. Intraindividual blood pressure variability was calculated as the average real variability over 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods. Participants were categorized into 3 adjudicated clinical outcomes: no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, probable dementia. Cox proportional hazards models examined the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering. Associations with mean blood pressure were also explored.

RESULTS

Higher systolic 24-hour blood pressure variability was associated with increased risk for probable dementia in the standard group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.56 [95% CI 1.16, 5.62], p = 0.019) but not in the intensive group (HR: 0.54 [95% CI 0.24, 1.23], p = 0.141). Similar findings were observed with daytime systolic blood pressure variability but not nighttime blood pressure variability. Mean blood pressure was not associated with cognitive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure variability via ambulatory monitoring is associated with risk for dementia under standard blood pressure treatment. Findings support prior evidence that blood pressure variability remains a risk for dementia despite strict control of mean blood pressure levels.

Blood pressure variability, central autonomic network dysfunction and cerebral small vessel disease in APOE4 carriers

Background

Increased blood pressure variability (BPV) is a risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and neurodegeneration, independent of age and average blood pressure, particularly in apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) carriers. However, it remains uncertain whether BPV elevation is a cause or a consequence of vascular brain injury, or to what degree injury to the central autonomic network (CAN) may contribute to BPV-associated risk in APOE4 carriers.

Methods

Independently living older adults (n=70) with no history of stroke or dementia were recruited from the community and underwent 5 minutes of resting beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring, genetic testing, and brain MRI. Resting BPV, APOE genotype, CSVD burden on brain MRI, and resting state CAN connectivity by fMRI were analyzed. Causal mediation and moderation analysis evaluated BPV and CAN effects on CSVD in APOE4 carriers (n=37) and non-carriers (n=33).

Results

Higher BPV was associated with the presence and extent of CSVD in APOE4 carriers, but not non-carriers, independent of CAN connectivity (B= 18.92, P= .02), and CAN connectivity did not mediate the relationship between BPV and CSVD. In APOE4 carriers, CAN connectivity moderated the relationship between BPV and CSVD, whereby BPV effects on CSVD were greater in those with lower CAN connectivity (B= 36.43, P= .02).

Conclusions

Older APOE4 carriers with higher beat-to-beat BPV exhibit more extensive CSVD, independent of average blood pressure, and the strength of CAN connectivity does not mediate these effects. Findings suggest increased BPV is more likely a cause, not a consequence, of CSVD. BPV is more strongly associated with CSVD in APOE4 carriers with lower rsCAN connectivity, suggesting CAN dysfunction and BPV elevation may have synergistic effects on CSVD. Further studies are warranted to understand the interplay between BPV and CAN function in APOE4 carriers.

Blood Pressure Variability and Cerebral Perfusion Decline: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Trial

Background Blood pressure variability (BPV) is predictive of cerebrovascular disease and dementia, possibly though cerebral hypoperfusion. Higher BPV is associated with cerebral blood flow (CBF) decline in observational cohorts, but relationships in samples with strictly controlled blood pressure remain understudied. We investigated whether BPV relates to change in CBF in the context of intensive versus standard antihypertensive treatment. Methods and Results In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT MIND (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial-Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension) trial, 289 participants (mean, 67.6 [7.6 SD] years, 38.8% women) underwent 4 blood pressure measurements over a 9-month period after treatment randomization (intensive versus standard) and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and ≈4-year follow-up. BPV was calculated as tertiles of variability independent of mean. CBF was determined for whole brain, gray matter, white matter, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and entorhinal cortex. Linear mixed models examined relationships between BPV and change in CBF under intensive versus standard antihypertensive treatment. Higher BPV in the standard treatment group was associated with CBF decline in all regions (ß comparing the first versus third tertiles of BPV in whole brain: -0.09 [95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01]; P=0.03), especially in medial temporal regions. In the intensive treatment group, elevated BPV was related to CBF decline only in the hippocampus (ß, -0.10 [95% CI, -0.18, -0.01]; P=0.03). Conclusions Elevated BPV is associated with CBF decline, especially under standard blood pressure-lowering strategies. Relationships were particularly robust in medial temporal regions, consistent with prior work using observational cohorts. Findings highlight the possibility that BPV remains a risk for CBF decline even in individuals with strictly controlled mean blood pressure levels. Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01206062.