Antihypertensive drug class and adherence: an electronic monitoring study

A Retrospective Observational Real-Word Analysis of the Adherence, Healthcare Resource Consumption and Costs in Patients Treated with Bisoprolol/Perindopril as Single-Pill or Free Combination

INTRODUCTION

The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or free-equivalent combination (FEC) of perindopril and bisoprolol (PER/BIS) in a large Italian population.

METHODS

This observational retrospective analysis was based on administrative databases covering approximately 7 million subjects across Italy. All adult subjects receiving PER/BIS as SPC or FEC between January 2017-June 2020 were included. Subjects were followed for 1 year after the first prescription of PER/BIS as FEC (± 1 month) or SPC. Before comparing the SPC and FEC cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. Drug utilization was investigated as adherence (defined by the proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence (evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves). Hospitalizations and mean annual direct healthcare costs (due to drug prescriptions, hospitalizations and use of outpatient services) were analyzed during follow-up.

RESULTS

The original cohort included 11,440 and 6521 patients taking the SPC and FEC PER/BIS combination, respectively. After PSM, two balanced SPC and FEC cohorts of 4688 patients were obtained (mean age 70 years, approximately 50% male, 24% in secondary prevention). The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥ 80%) was higher for those on SPC (45.5%) than those on FEC (38.6%), p < 0.001. The PER/BIS combination was discontinued by 35.8% of patients in the SPC cohort and 41.7% in the FEC cohort (p < 0.001). The SPC cohort had fewer cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (5.3%) than the free-combination cohort (7.4%), p < 0.001. Mean annual total healthcare costs were lower in the SPC (1999€) than in the FEC (2359€) cohort (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, patients treated with PER/BIS SPC showed higher adherence, lower risk of drug discontinuation, reduced risk of CV hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs than those on FEC of the same drugs.

A practical approach to assessment of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment

Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is frequent, complicates the care of hypertensive patients, represents one of the major causes of treatment failure and is linked with the increased risk of cardiovascular events. Identifying a non-adherent patient is one of the recent daily-practice tasks for which the ideal solution has not yet been found. Presence of certain clinical red flags should prompt the clinician to consider non-adherence. Chemical adherence testing using serum or urine antihypertensive levels is regarded as the best method so far and should be used if available. Alternatively, the check for prescription refills in the patient electronic medical records, or directly observed therapy with subsequent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may be used. We suggest a simple algorithm to guide the clinicians to detect non-adherence in the practice.

[Study on the use of multi-compartment compliance aids to improve blood pressure values in hypertensive patients]

Objectives

To analyse the improvement of adherence in non-adherent patients with uncontrolled HT, polymedicated and older than 55 years after the use, or not, of Multicompartment compliance aids (MCA).

Design

Longitudinal research (6 month). Levels of adherence to treatment were analysed using an adapted version of Morisky-Green test, counting of returned medication (MCA group) and blood pressure (BP) values. Site: Multicentre study in 35 community pharmacies in Spain. Participants: 195 participants (88 MCA group and 107 control group) older than 55 years, polymedicated, non-adherent to medication, with uncontrolled hypertension and using electronic prescription. Interventions: MCA group received their medication in MCA while control group received their medication as usual. Main measurements: Systolic BP/Diastolic BP was recurrently measured with a digital tensiometer in both groups.

Results

MCA group obtained a significant decrease in BP values compared to the control group (Systolic BP decreased by 18.3 mmHg in the MCA group vs. 9.9 mmHg in the control group and Diastolic BP by 9.9 mmHg vs. 8.9 mmHg). Both groups increased their adherence to over 90%.

Conclusions

The use of MCA controlled BP levels in almost 50% of the participants. For this fact, MCA is postulated as a good tool (cost-effective, well tolerated by users, easy to use ...) to improve the adherence of patients and control their hypertension, although more studies are necessary.

Myristolated Serotonin 2A Receptor Peptide Promotes Long-Lasting Blood Pressure-Lowering and Reno protection in Hypertensive Rat Species

Aim

The aim of the present study was to test whether conjugation of a synthetic peptide corresponding to a fragment of the second extracellular domain of the human serotonin 2A receptor substantially alters the in vivo pharmacodynamic blood pressure-lowering profile of the peptide in different hypertensive rat strains.

Methods

Sertuercept (SCLLADDN) was synthesized and modified using pegylation or myristolation. The two different peptide conjugates were tested in male Zucker diabetic fatty rats for acute and long-lasting blood pressure-lowering effects following single intraperitoneal administration. The myristolated Sertuercept was administered intraperitoneally to female Zucker fatty and male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and blood pressure was monitored either using tail cuff measurement (female Zucker) or by telemetry (SHR) rats. Plasma immunoglobulin G obtained by Protein G affinity chromatography in 25-week-old female Zucker or male spontaneously hypertensive rats was tested for binding to a linear synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of the serotonin 2A receptor. A cohort of male Zucker diabetic fatty rats was randomized to seven weeks of once-weekly myristolated Sertuercept or scrambled peptide (injections) and the kidneys were examined histologically for differences in total kidney lesions or fibrosis.

Results

Pegylated Sertuercept promoted substantial blood pressure-lowering lasting approximately 30-48 hours in male Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Blood pressure-lowering following a single injection of Myristolated Sertuercept was much longer-lasting (6-11 days) and it was effective in male Zucker diabetic fatty rats, male spontaneously hypertensive rats and in a subset of hypertensive female Zucker fatty rats. Seven weeks' treatment with once-weekly Myristolated Sertuercept (2mg/kg) was associated with significantly fewer kidney lesions and less interstitial fibrosis compared to scrambled peptide in 25-week-old male Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (4 of 4 tested) harbored plasma IgG which bound significantly to serotonin 2A receptor peptide, and a subset of female Zucker fatty rats harboring IgG were responsive to blood pressure-lowering from the myristolated Sertuercept peptide.

Summary

Myristolated-Sertuercept, an epitope-specific peptide comprised of a portion of second extracellular loop of the human serotonin 2A receptor was safe, well-tolerated and effectively lowered blood pressure for one week or longer in two different strains of male hypertensive rats. These data provide proof-of-concept that once-weekly systemic drug administration is feasible to achieve not only long-lasting hypertension control, but also substantial renoprotection.

Linkage between electronic prescribing data and pharmacy claims records to determine primary adherence: the case of antihypertensive therapy in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley Region, Portugal

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HT) is highly prevalent and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Over 42% of Portuguese adults have HT. Even though the benefits of antihypertensive (AHT) drugs have been demonstrated, HT control remains inadequate. One major reason is that patients often fail to take their medications as prescribed. This paper aims to determine primary adherence to AHT therapy in newly diagnosed and treated hypertensive patients in Primary Health Care (PHC) units of Lisbon and Tagus Valley Health Region.

METHODS

This study reports data from a population-based, retrospective, cohort study from patients diagnosed with HT in PHC units of Lisbon and Tagus Valley Region from 1 January to 31 March 2011, with no prior use of AHT drugs. Primary adherence rate was expressed as number of claims records/total number of prescriptions records. Data were collected from SIARS for each patient during a 2-year period.

RESULTS

Overall primary adherence rate was 58.5%, increasing with age. Rates were higher for men, living in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and diagnosed with uncomplicated HT. Drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system had the highest rates, increasing for fixed-dose combinations and diminishing with the increase of cost for the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, almost 1 out of 2 prescribed AHT drugs were not dispensed. Until this study, little was known in Portugal about primary adherence. Our findings imply that the potential benefits of AHT therapy cannot be fully realized in this population.

Home Blood Pressure Control and Drug Prescription Patterns among Thai Hypertensives: A 1-Year Analysis of Telehealth Assisted Instrument in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Nationwide Pilot Project

Background

Several interventions have been proposed to improve hypertension control with various outcomes. The home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is widely accepted for assessing the response to medications. However, the enhancement of blood pressure (BP) control with HBP telemonitoring technology has yet to be studied in Thailand.

Objective

To evaluate the attainment of HBP control and drug prescription patterns in Thai hypertensives at one year after initiating the TeleHealth Assisted Instrument in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (THAI HBPM) nationwide pilot project.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective study enrolled treated hypertensive adults without prior regular HBPM to obtain monthly self-measured HBP using the same validated, oscillometric telemonitoring devices. The HBP reading was transferred to the clinic via a cloud-based system, so the physicians can adjust the medications at each follow-up visit on a real-life basis. Controlled HBP is defined as having HBP data at one year of follow-up within the defined target range (<135/85 mmHg).

Results

A total of 1,177 patients (mean age 58 ± 12.3 years, 59.4% women, 13.1% with diabetes) from 46 hospitals (81.5% primary care centers) were enrolled in the study. The mean clinic BP was 143.9 ± 18.1/84.3 ± 11.9 mmHg while the mean HBP was 134.4 ± 15.3/80.1 ± 9.4 mmHg with 609 (51.8%) patients having HBP reading <135/85 mmHg at enrollment. At one year of follow-up after implementing the HBP telemonitoring, 671 patients (57.0%) achieved HBP control. Patients with uncontrolled HBP had a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and greater waist circumference than the controlled group. The majority of uncontrolled patients were still prescribed only one (36.0%) or two drugs (34.4%) at the end of the study. The antihypertensive drugs were not uptitrated in 136 (24%) patients with uncontrolled HBP at baseline. Calcium channel blocker was the most prescribed drug class (63.0%) followed by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (44.8%) while the thiazide-type diuretic was used in 18.9% of patients with controlled HBP and 16.4% in uncontrolled patients.

Conclusion

With the implementation of HBP telemonitoring, the BP control rate based on HBP analysis was still low. This is possibly attributed to the therapeutic inertia of healthcare physicians. Calcium channel blocker was the most frequently used agent while the diuretic was underutilized. The long-term clinical benefit of overcoming therapeutic inertia alongside HBP telemonitoring needs to be validated in a future study.

Impact of Therapeutic Inertia on Long-Term Blood Pressure Control: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

[Figure: see text].

Association of Angiotensin II-Stimulating Antihypertensive Use and Dementia Risk: Post Hoc Analysis of the PreDIVA Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives (thiazides, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin I receptor blockers) convey a lower risk of incident dementia compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers), in accordance with the "angiotensin hypothesis."

METHODS

We performed Cox regression analyses of incident dementia (or mortality as competing risk) during 6-8 years of follow-up in a population sample of 1,909 community-dwelling individuals (54% women) without dementia, aged 70-78 (mean 74.5 ± 2.5) years.

RESULTS

After a median of 6.7 years of follow-up, dementia status was available for 1,870 (98%) and mortality for 1,904 (>99%) participants. Dementia incidence was 5.6% (27/480) in angiotensin II-stimulating, 8.2% (59/721) in angiotensin II-inhibiting, and 6.9% (46/669) in both antihypertensive type users. Adjusted for dementia risk factors including blood pressure and medical history, angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensive users had a 45% lower incident dementia rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) without excess mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.16), and individuals using both types had a nonsignificant 20% lower dementia rate (HR, 0.80; 95% CI,0.53-1.20) without excess mortality (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.24), compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensive users. Results were consistent for subgroups based on diabetes and stroke history, but may be specific for individuals without a history of cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Users of angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives had lower dementia rates compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensive users, supporting the angiotensin hypothesis. Confounding by indication must be examined further, although subanalyses suggest this did not influence results. If replicated, dementia prevention could become a compelling indication for older individuals receiving antihypertensive treatment.

Is there any Hope for Monitoring Adherence in an Efficient and Feasible Way for Resistant Hypertension Diagnosis and Follow-Up?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is highly prevalent and represents a major factor affecting their effectiveness in hypertensive patients, thus contributing to apparent treatment resistance. It is however often overlooked because the methods to assess non-adherence are mainly subjective, limiting their usefulness in clinical practice. Non-adherence to treatment affects daily patient management, resulting in inappropriate, costly, and potentially harmful treatments and loss of the expected benefits from antihypertensive drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specialized centers now use a combination of objective screening tools. Firstly, snapshots of adherence levels can be provided by analytical drug detection in various biological matrixes using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and secondly electronic monitoring systems of drug delivery which provide longitudinal data on adherence. Routine utilization of those tools allows the detection of non-adherence in patients with resistant hypertension, thus enabling implementation of appropriate interventions to improve drug adherence and avoid unnecessary treatment intensification. Other complementary techniques, such as digital health feedback system with ingestible sensors, are currently evaluated. In the context of an increasing burden of uncontrolled and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, detecting non-adherence to antihypertensive therapy is, as acknowledged by the latest guidelines, a top priority to implement in clinical practice but still faces medical conservatism and disbelief.

Forgetting to take antiseizure medications is associated with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, as revealed by a cross-sectional study

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of nonadherence to antiseizure medications (ASMs) and clinical characteristics on seizure control, we employed a prospective cohort cross-sectional study using self-reports and medical records of patients with epilepsy (PWEs).

Methods

Eight hundred and fifty-five PWEs taking ASMs were enrolled from fourteen collaborative outpatient clinics from January 2018 to March 2019. Questions from the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale were used as adherence self-reports. If a PWE’s questionnaire indicated that they had missed doses of their ASMs, outpatient physicians asked them directly about the details of their compliance, including the timing of intentionally or unintentionally missed doses. The association between lack of seizure control and utilization outcomes, such as missed doses, demographics, and clinical characteristics of the PWEs, were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that forgetting to take ASMs was associated with lack of seizure control and the existence of focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures. Dementia, younger age, use of three or more antiepileptic agents, and living in a one-person household were associated with the risk of forgetting to take ASMs.

Significance

For PWEs with poor drug management or a high incidence of missed doses of ASMs, efforts to improve adherence could facilitate better seizure control and decrease focal to bilateral tonic–clonic propagation.

Adherence in Hypertension

The global epidemic of hypertension is largely uncontrolled and hypertension remains the leading cause of noncommunicable disease deaths worldwide. Suboptimal adherence, which includes failure to initiate pharmacotherapy, to take medications as often as prescribed, and to persist on therapy long-term, is a well-recognized factor contributing to the poor control of blood pressure in hypertension. Several categories of factors including demographic, socioeconomic, concomitant medical-behavioral conditions, therapy-related, healthcare team and system-related factors, and patient factors are associated with nonadherence. Understanding the categories of factors contributing to nonadherence is useful in managing nonadherence. In patients at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, electronic and biochemical monitoring are useful for detecting nonadherence and for improving adherence. Increasing the availability and affordability of these more precise measures of adherence represent a future opportunity to realize more of the proven benefits of evidence-based medications. In the absence of new antihypertensive drugs, it is important that healthcare providers focus their attention on how to do better with the drugs they have. This is the reason why recent guidelines have emphasize the important need to address drug adherence as a major issue in hypertension management.

A study on usefulness of modified medication adherence scale in assessing adherence among hypertensive patients

Background:

Adherence to medication is important for control of blood pressure (BP) and prevention of its complications. Identifying factors which improve adherence to treatment helps in improving cardiovascular outcome.

Aim:

The aim is to study the adherence of hypertensive patients to medication using modified medication adherence scale (MMAS).

Materials and Methods:

This study was done as a cross-sectional study in the Department of General medicine in Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, from May 2017 to October 2017. All adult patients of both sexes diagnosed to have hypertension were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. Adherence to hypertension was assessed using MMAS and results were analyzed. SPSS 22 software (International Business Machines Corporation, Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY) was used for statistical purposes.

Results:

A total of 150 patients were included in the study. There were 83 males and 67 females in the study. Good adherence was observed in 74 (49%) out of the total 150. Forty-nine (59%) males and 25 (37%) females were found adherent to treatment. Patients with monotherapy had a good adherence compared to those with polytherapy. Patients with good adherence had a good control of BP.

Conclusion:

MMAS is a simple and useful tool for assessing medication adherence among hypertensive patients.

What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to answer two research questions: (1) What is the clinical evidence for the reported outcomes in studies on electronic pillboxes for older adults? and (2) What is the technology readiness level (TRL) of the electronic pillboxes used, or intended to be used, for older adults?Methods: The scholarly literature was systematically searched and analyzed. Articles were included if they reported results about electronic pillboxes that were used or intended to be used for older adults' medication.Results: Clinical studies used commercially well-established electronic pillboxes with a high TRL. New electronic pillboxes in development had a low TRL. The discovered outcome was mainly adherence to medication. The overall mean adherence to medication regimens for all the studies using an electronic pillbox was higher than the gold standard of a good adherence level cut-off point (mean adherence 88.8%>80%). However, we found a large variation in this variable (SD = 10.7). With regard to an older adult population's adherence to medication regimens, for the outcome variable of those who had undergone a kidney transplant, the clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact was strong (1b); for those with a chronic hepatitis C medical condition, the clinical evidence was medium (3), and for those with arterial hypertension and multiple chronic (diabetes and hypertension) medical conditions, the clinical evidence was weak (5).Conclusion: More research is needed in this area using designs that provide greater validity.Implications for RehabilitationElectronic pillboxes with multiple reminders such as the "voice of a friend" or relative, which implies that electronic pillboxes which adopt "a social role" are advisable.An unequal level of clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact on the adherence outcome variable was found.For new electronic pillboxes still in development that specifically take into account older adults' needs, the TRL is still low; as a result, they could not be tested in real settings.

Technological methods to measure adherence to antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The WHO's Consolidated Guidelines (2016) call for research on improved methods to proactively monitor adherence and identify those individuals who have the greatest needs for adherence support. This review aims to elucidate the latest technologies available to measure adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis against HIV infection and present their utility in various settings and populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Within the last few years, advances have been made in the features of existing technology to measure adherence (real-time electronic adherence measurements), additional approaches have been developed (digital medicine systems) and improved (short message service surveys), and point of care testing for pharmacokinetic measures are under development.

SUMMARY

Technology advances in adherence measurement are promising for improved accuracy and, in some cases, the ability to intervene with adherence challenges in real time. This progress will greatly further our understanding of adherence behavior, as well as the ability to effectively link interventions with individuals who need them, thus maximizing the clinical and public health benefits of both antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis.

Heart rate is a useful marker of adherence to beta-blocker treatment in hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Suboptimal medication adherence is common among patients with hypertension. Measurements of plasma or urinary levels of antihypertensive drugs are useful, but not widely available. The aim of our study was to investigate the relation of patients' heart rates to their serum beta-blocker levels.

METHODS

We correlated 220 measurements of serum beta-blocker levels in 106 patients with apparently resistant hypertension to their corresponding office heart rate. A significant proportion, 44.6% of patients, were non-adherent to beta-blocker treatment according to serum level measurement. Non-adherent patients had significantly higher heart rates (80.9 vs. 66.6 bpm, p < .001), systolic (157.4 vs. 147.0 mm Hg, p = .002) and diastolic blood pressure (91.1 vs. 87.2 mm Hg, p = .041) in comparison to adherent patients.

RESULTS

Heart rate above 75.5 beats per minute predicted non-adherence to beta-blocker treatment with a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity 86.8% and AUC ROC 0.802 (p < .001). Higher heart rate cutoff might be applicable for nebivolol but was not determined due to the low number of patients treated with nebivolol.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that heart rate was shown to be a good predictor of non-adherence to beta-blocker treatment, and might become a quick and easy measure to determine patient adherence in hypertensive patients.

Implication of different initial beta blockers on treatment persistence: atenolol vs new-generation beta blocker, a population-based study

AIM

Potential heterogeneity within the same class of drug in terms of persistence may lead to different clinical implications. Given that the increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular events are due, in part, to the lack of persistent use of antihypertensive medications, the objective of this study was to evaluate 1-year persistence of new-generation beta blockers compared to atenolol in antihypertensive treatment-naïve patients.

METHODS

A total of 9978 patients aged 18 years or older with hypertension newly diagnosed in 2012, without hypertension-related complication and initiated treatment with beta blocker monotherapy during 2012 were included in the analysis. Rate and duration of treatment and drug persistence were compared between atenolol and new-generation beta blockers. Hazards of discontinuation in nonatenolol compared to atenolol were evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional model.

RESULTS

The rate of treatment persistence was higher in the nonatenolol group (57.35% vs 53.40%, P<.0001), and the time to treatment discontinuation was earlier in the atenolol group with a minimal difference in the average (243.2 vs 254 days, P<.0001). New-generation beta blockers demonstrated a lower risk of treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) compared to atenolol; a notable improvement was observed with carvedilol and nebivolol (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.69-0.80 and HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89, respectively), whereas betaxolol showed a substantially greater hazard for discontinuation compared to atenolol.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a meaningful improvement in treatment persistence with new-generation beta blockers compared to atenolol, with betaxolol as exception.

Influence of initial angiotensin receptor blockers on treatment persistence in uncomplicated hypertension: A nation-wide population-based study

We identified 55 504 uncomplicated, treatment-naïve hypertensive patients who started angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in 2012 from national claims data. The proportion of patients remaining on any hypertension treatment at 12 months and the adherence rate were similar between the losartan cohort (66.82% and 68.25%) and the nonlosartan ARB cohort (67.48% and 69.01%). After adjusting for confounding factors, there was no difference in persistence (aHR 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.01) on hypertension treatment between losartan and nonlosartan ARB cohort. Post hoc analysis showed that patients initially prescribed eprosartan, irbesartan (both, aHR 1.33), and telmisartan (aHR 1.11) were more likely to discontinue the initial drug, whereas valsartan initiators (aHR 0.96) were less likely compared with losartan initiators.

Evaluation and implementation of behavioral and educational tools that improves the patients' intentional and unintentional non-adherence to cardiovascular medications in family medicine clinics

Objective: There are limited number of studies describing the reasons and interventions of non-adherence to cardiovascular medications in United Arab Emirates (UAE). We aimed to implement and evaluate the behavioral and educational tools that indicate the reasons of non-adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases and improve patient’s adherence to their cardiovascular medications. Methods: In this prospective interventional study, we recruited patients (n = 300) with cardiovascular diseases from three family medicine clinics in Al Ain, UAE in 2010. We assessed patients’ responses to a validated brief medication questionnaire (BMQ). Results: At the end of the study, we observed a significant improvement in adherence. When we compared pre- and post-interventions, the mean (± standard deviation, SD) score for non-adherence to current regimen were 4.1 ± 0.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.3 (p = 0.034); indication of negative believes or motivational barriers scores was 1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 0.1 (p = 0.027); the indication of recall barrier scores was 1.6 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 (p = 0.014); and the indication of access barrier scores was 1.6 ± 0.2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 (p = 0.019). Mean blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, low density lipoprotein and postprandial blood glucose decreased significantly (p < 0.01) post-intervention. Conclusion: We reported that implemented multifaceted tools targeting patients, provider and healthcare system have improved the adherence to cardiovascular medications. Our interventions managed to improve patients’ clinical outcome via improving adherence to prescribed cardiovascular medications.

Hydroxychloroquine Blood Levels in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clarifying Dosing Controversies and Improving Adherence

OBJECTIVE

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used for its effect on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and longterm benefits. This can be limited by adherence. One way to assess adherence is to measure blood levels. Conflicting data exist regarding blood levels and disease activity. There is disagreement about dosing; rheumatologists recommend weight-based dosing while some other specialists advocate height-based "ideal body weight" dosing.

METHODS

Patients were prescribed HCQ not exceeding 6.5 mg/kg (max 400 mg/day). In hemodialysis, the dose was 200 mg after each session, and in renal insufficiency it was 200 mg/day. Levels were measured at each visit with a therapeutic range of 500-2000 ng/ml. Patients were divided according to baseline blood level. To assess the effect of measurement and counseling on adherence, we compared the proportion of patients with a level of 500 ng/ml or higher based on the number of prior assessments.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with HCQ levels in the therapeutic range differed significantly by age, sex, and Vitamin D level. There was a trend toward lower levels with renal failure. Blood levels were similar regardless of height and ideal body weight. Comparing those with undetectable, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic levels, disease activity decreased (SLE Disease Activity Index 2.92, 2.36, and 2.20, p = 0.04 for trend). At first, 56% were therapeutic, and by the third measurement this increased to 80% (p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There was a trend toward higher disease activity with lower HCQ levels. Renal failure dosing led to suboptimum levels. We show that weight-based dosing (max 400 mg daily) is appropriate and that height does not appear to influence levels. Measurement, counseling, and repeated testing can increase adherence rates.

Association between adherence, treatment satisfaction and illness perception in hypertensive patients

The relationship between adherence to antihypertension medications, treatment satisfaction and illness perception has not been studied so far. The primary objective of this study was to examine the association between adherence to medication, treatment satisfaction and illness perception in Lebanese hypertensive patients. The relation between medication adherence and blood pressure (BP) control was also assessed. In this cross-sectional study, patients were recruited from the physician's practice offices and community pharmacies in Beirut. Patients who had been treated for hypertension for at least 3 months were invited to participate in the study; they completed three questionnaires: the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-4) and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ). BP was also measured and recorded. A total of 117 subjects were included, of whom 29.1% had poor adherence to their antihypertension treatment (MMAS-8 scores<6). The odds of having well-controlled hypertension was 3.5 times higher in patients with high adherence compared with patients with poor adherence (P=0.010). Treatment satisfaction was significantly greater in patients with good adherence (P<0.001). Neither socio-demographic, disease- nor drug-related characteristics of the participants were significantly associated with medication adherence. As for illness perception, even though the mean BIPQ score of adherent participants was lower than the mean score of non-adherent participants, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, treatment satisfaction was found to be a predictor of adherence. Studies are needed to determine whether interventions to increase satisfaction can improve adherence and BP control.