The role of induction therapy and surgery for stage IIIA lung cancer

The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.

Postoperative and Preoperative Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND: Few randomized trials of preoperative and postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy have been performed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The authors reviewed the recent literature on comparative trials and meta-analyses to determine the current status of adjuvant therapy for patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: Postoperative adjuvant therapy with cisplatin-containing regimens reduces the risk of death by 3% at two years and by 5% at five years. Preoperative therapy can clear tumor in the resected specimen in approximately 15% of cases, and two small trials report substantial survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The development of new and more active regimens for NSCLC may provide the biologic basis for clinical trials to demonstrate more pronounced benefit for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Dose-intense therapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin (VIP-E) in 107 consecutive patients with limited- and extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the feasibility and activity of combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin in limited-stage (LS, stage I-IIIB) and extensive-stage (ES, stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). End-points were treatment-related morbidity and mortality, response rate, duration of response, and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given at a dose of etoposide (500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4000 mg/m2), cisplatin (50 mg/m2), and epirubicin (50 mg/m2) (VIP-E) to 107 patients with NSCLC. Twenty-five patients with qualifying responses proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after etoposide (1500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (12,000 mg/m2), carboplatin (750 mg/m2) and epirubicin (150 mg/m2) (VIC-E) conditioning. RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL-DOSE VIP-E: 35 of 102 (34%) evaluable patients responded (2 CR's, 33 PR's), 33/102 patients (33%) showed no change (NC); the remainder of patients progressed with therapy (PD). Objective response rate was 68% (4% CR, 64% PR) in LS-NSCLC and 23% (1.4% CR, 21.4% PR) in ES-NSCLC. Median duration of survival was 13 months in LS-NSCLC and 5.5 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-year survival was 26% in LS and 2% in ES-NSCLC. RESULTS OF HIGH-DOSE VIC-E: 23 of 24 evaluable patients improved or maintained prior responses (92%), I patient showed NC. Treatment mortality was 4%. Median duration of survival was 17 months in LS-NSCLC and 10 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-year survival was 30% in LS and 8% in ES-NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Response-rates and survival after conventional-dose VIP-E chemotherapy are comparable to other published trials of combination chemotherapy in NSCLC. Toxicity and mortality is acceptable in limited stage, but unacceptably high in extensive stage NSCLC. Although better response-rates were achieved in the high-dose arm, they did not translate into improved survival. Most stage IV NSCLC-patients will neither benefit from VIP-E conventional dose, nor from VIC-E high dose chemotherapy. Whether selected LS-patients with partial or complete responses to VIP-E induction chemotherapy could benefit from dose intensification in an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting remains to be determined.

Third annual William L. McGuire Memorial Lecture. "Studies on the estrogen receptor in breast cancer"--20 years as a target for the treatment and prevention of cancer

In 1973, McGuire and Chamness (In: O'Malley BW and Means AR (ed) Receptors for Reproductive Hormones, Plenum Press) summarized their work on the estrogen receptor in animal and human breast tumors, and in so doing described a target for therapeutic intervention. At that time there were no clinically useful antiestrogens, but the subsequent development of tamoxifen for breast cancer therapy has revolutionized the approach to treatment. Long-term adjuvant tamoxifen adjuvant therapy (i.e., greater than one year) has proven efficacy to enhance the survival of breast cancer patients. In addition, because there is an associated 40% decrease in contralateral breast cancer during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy and tamoxifen maintains bone density and reduces fatal myocardial infarction, clinical trials to test the worth of tamoxifen as a preventive for breast cancer in high risk women have started in the United States, United Kingdom, and Italy. Initial concerns that long-term tamoxifen causes endometrial cancer have been placed in perspective and analyzed by a review of the literature. Tamoxifen only doubles the normal risk of detecting endometrial cancer (i.e., to 2 per 1,000 tamoxifen-treated women per year), and 80% of these cases are early stage, good prognosis disease. Annual gynecological examinations and education are essential to provide reassurance for patients. The success of tamoxifen has encouraged the development of new antiestrogens to exploit the estrogen receptor as a therapeutic target. Droloxifene and TAT-59 mimic the metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen in having a high affinity for the estrogen receptor (Jordan et al, J Endocrinol 75:305, 1977). These drugs appear to have a pharmacological profile similar to tamoxifen. In contrast, the new pure antiestrogens have a distinct mechanism of action and will be valuable either as a first line therapy for advanced breast cancer or as a second line endocrine therapy after the failure of long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Finally, a new strategy is being developed to exploit the target site specific action of antiestrogens. Raloxifene, an antiestrogen with high affinity for the estrogen receptor but only weak estrogenicity for the uterus, prevents rat mammary tumorigenesis and maintains bone density. The drug is to be evaluated as a treatment for osteoporosis, but may also prevent the development of breast and endometrial cancer in a broad group of treated subjects. The identification of the estrogen receptor as a target for therapeutic opportunities has proved to be extremely beneficial for the control of breast cancer and has the added potential to control osteoporosis and coronary heart disease in women.