Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. A phase II study of the Italian Group for the Study of Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas (GISCAD)

Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors.

Abstract

Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.

First-line chemotherapy with raltitrexed in metastatic colorectal cancer: an Association des Gastro-entérologues Oncologues (AGEO) multicentre study

BACKGROUND

In case of contraindication or intolerance to fluoropyrimidines, raltitrexed is a validated alternative in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), associated or not with oxaliplatin. Little is known about the outcomes of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan or targeted therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study enroled mCRC patients treated with first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from treatment start.

RESULTS

75 patients were treated with raltitrexed alone, TOMOX, or TOMIRI with or without bevacizumab. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 31% of patients, without significant difference between the different treatment schedules. amongst the 36 patients with a history of fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiac toxicity, none developed cardiovascular events on raltitrexed. Median PFS and OS were 10.6 (95% CI 8.2 - 13.1) and 27.4 months (95% CI 24.1-38.1), respectively. Considering the chemotherapy regimen, TOMOX was significantly associated with better PFS and OS compared to TOMIRI and raltitrexed alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mCRC not eligible for fluoropyrimidines, first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile. PFS and OS were consistent with usual survival data in mCRC, and significantly better in patients treated with TOMOX, independently of associated targeted therapies.

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Raltitrexed in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Use of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with significant toxicities. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of raltitrexed use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who developed significant toxicities after fluoropyrimidine-based treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with raltitrexed-based systemic therapy after developing serious adverse events with fluoropyrimidine-based treatment in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2018. Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Progression-free and overall survival were assessed from the start of raltitrexed-based therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were identified for the study. The median age was 66.5 years, and 58.1% of patients were men. The primary cancer site was right, left, and transverse colon in 38.4%, 27.9%, and 9.3%, respectively. The remaining 24.4% had rectal cancer. Among all patients, 43.0% had received more than 2 prior systemic therapies, and 37.6% had developed previous cardiotoxicity to fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. The median progression-free and overall survival were 8.5 and 10.2 months, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression model, patients with left-sided colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.97; P = .044) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.82; P = .032) had a longer progression-free survival, whereas left-sidedness of colon cancer was the only factor that predicted overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88; P = .029). Raltitrexed was well-tolerated with common adverse events that included anemia in 41.7% of patients and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in 27.4%. Most toxicities were grade 1/2, but 16.7% of patients experienced grade 3. There were no cardiac events and treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed in patients with colorectal cancer who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based systemic therapy is effective and well-tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-based transarterial chemoembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastases. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin for colorectal liver metastases in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial conducted in 12 hospitals from different areas in China. A total of 90 patients with colorectal liver metastases were enrolled and treated by TACE with raltitrexed 4 mg and oxaliplatin 100 mg, followed by embolotherapy with 50 mg oxaliplatin and 5-20 ml lipiodol, administered every 28 days for four cycles. Patients were followed up every 3 months after the treatment and up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was time to progression. For the full analysis set (FAS), the median time to progression and overall survival were 9.1 and 17.8 months, respectively. The disease control rate in FAS was 71 (78.9%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported for 24 (26.7%) out of all 90 patients. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia, transglutaminase abnormality, and decreased neutrophil were observed in eight (8.9%), six (6.7%), and five (5.6%) patients, respectively. No unexpected adverse events or toxic deaths were observed. TACE with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin is feasible, clinically beneficial, and well tolerated with low-grade toxicity for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

Oxaliplatin with Raltitrexed and Preoperative Radiotherapy in T3-T4 Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer. A Dose Finding Study

Aims and background

The availability of new drugs offers the opportunity to improve the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Raltitrexed and oxaliplatin are effective in advanced colorectal cancer with acceptable toxicity and can act as radiation enhancers as shown in phase 1-11 studies. The aim of the study was thus to determine the recommended dose of oxaliplatin concomitantly administered with raltitrexed and concurrent preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage 11-111 extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Methods

From September 2001 to September 2002, 18 consecutive patients with T3/T4 rectal cancer were treated at our Institution with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery after 6-8 weeks. Pelvic radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks followed by a 5.4 Gy boost at 1.8 Gy daily. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 3 mg/m2/iv of raltitrexed on days 1, 19, 38 of radiotherapy treatment with incremental doses of oxaliplatin according to dose finding rules (4 dose levels: 65, 85, 110, 130 mg/m2). Dose-limiting toxicity for oxaliplatin was defined as either grade 3-4 hematological or grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or neurological toxicity. We studied a minimum of 3 patients at each dose level.

Results

Three patients were treated at 65, 85, and 110 mg/m2/iv, respectively, while 9 patients were recruited at the last dose level. Neither grade 3-4 gastrointestinal nor neurological toxicity were documented. Dose-limiting toxicity was documented in 2/9 subjects at the 130 mg/m2 level consisting of grade 3 transient asymptomatic leukopenia. Thirteen patients developed transient increase of one or more liver enzymes (grade 3-4) and 2 patients developed grade 3 perineal dermatitis. All patients received the programmed dose of radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was not completed in 4 cases due to grade 2 protracted leukopenia.

Conclusions

The maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin was not reached at the maximum dose level (IV); 130 mg/m2 can therefore be defined as the recommended dose. The combination of oxaliplatin with raltitrexed and radiotherapy can be considered feasible and well tolerated.

Transarterial chemoembolization with raltitrexed-based or floxuridine-based chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the efficiency and safety of raltitrexed- or floxuridine (FUDR)-based transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 patients with unresectable CRCLM who failed systemic chemotherapy and were treated with TACE in our department from Oct 2014 to Oct 2017. Of these, 61 patients received TACE using raltitrexed, oxaliplatin, and pirarubicin (raltitrexed group), and 20 received TACE using FUDR, oxaliplatin, and pirarubicin (FUDR group). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS, from the first TACE), progression-free survival (PFS, from the first TACE), and adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors for OS were analyzed.

RESULTS

The ORRs of the raltitrexed group and FUDR group were 67.2 and 45.0%, respectively (P = 0.076), and the DCRs were 86.9 and 80.0%, respectively (P = 0.452). The median OS (from first TACE) was 14.0 months in the raltitrexed group and 13.0 months in the FUDR group (P = 0.556). The median PFS (from first TACE) was 2.1 months in the raltitrexed group and 2.4 months in the FUDR group (P = 0.878). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the primary tumor site, Child-Pugh class, and combination with local ablation (RFA or CRA) were independent significant factors affecting survival. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05), and no treatment-related death occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

TACE treatment based on raltitrexed or FUDR is an efficient and safe alternative choice for treating unresectable CRCLM.

Raltitrexed plus Oxaliplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Aims and background

As raltitrexed and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) are both effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer but have different mechanisms of action, we studied the antitumoral activity and safety of their combined use in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods

A 15-min intravenous infusion of raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) and a 180-min infusion of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) were administered on day 1 every three weeks for a maximum of six cycles.

Results

The study involved 51 patients (27 males and 24 females) with a median age of 65 years (range, 43-78); 28 were aged ≥65 years. The primary tumor site was the colon in 35 patients and the rectum in 16. Thirty-four patients had received prior chemotherapy: 20 as adjuvant treatment and 14 as pretreatment. The most frequent metastatic sites were liver (18 cases), lung (10 cases), liver + lung (8 cases) and lymph nodes (3 cases). Twenty-four patients completed the entire treatment plan. The most common toxicities were transaminitis (16 patients, grade 3-4), diarrhea (six patients, grade 3), nausea/vomiting (one patient, grade 4), and asthenia (one patient, grade 3). The treatment was stopped in one patient because of prolonged grade 4 transaminitis. The adverse event profile was similar in the patients aged >65 years and <65 years. Complete responses were observed in 2 patients, partial responses in 12, stable disease in 23, and progression in 8.

Conclusions

The results of the study suggest that the raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin regimen is feasible and clinically active in advanced colorectal cancer.

A systematic review of raltitrexed-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Raltitrexed is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor belonging to the antimetabolite class of cytotoxic drugs. It is also effective in colorectal cancer (CRC) both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs, in particular in those patients with cardiologic risk factors or previous cardiotoxicity. The efficacy of first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and irinotecan (TOMIRI) was investigated in this systematic review. Studies that enrolled advanced CRC patients for first-line therapy with TOMOX/TOMIRI combinations were identified using electronic databases (Pubmed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). A systematic analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 2.2.064) software to calculate the pooled response rate and 95% confidence limits. The median pooled overall survival and progression-free survival were also calculated. Results for TOMOX and TOMIRI studies were compared using the two-sided Student's t-test. We tested for significant heterogeneity using Cochran's χ-test and I index. Twelve studies published between 2001 and 2012 were eligible for this analysis and a total of 735 patients were enrolled in these studies. The overall response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval 34-46%): 43.9% for TOMOX and 34.1% for TOMIRI arms. The weighted median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 14.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Neutropenia and liver toxicity were more frequent with TOMOX, whereas neutropenia and diarrhea were more frequent with TOMIRI. However, compared with historical FOLFOX and FOLFIRI trials, raltitrexed-based doublets are associated with less neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity and uncommon cardiotoxicity. TOMOX and TOMIRI doublets are active as first-line chemotherapy for advanced CRC and seem useful in particular when the use of 5-fluorouracil is contraindicated for cardiac comorbidity.

Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

AIMS

To evaluate the efficiency and safety profile of raltitrexed-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials comparing raltitrexed-based regimen to 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The outcomes included overall survival, overall response rate and toxicities.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 studies with 4622 patients. Overall, there were no significant differences between the two regimens in terms of overall survival (HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17, P=0.23) or overall response rate (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.86-1.38, P=0.47). In subgroup analysis, patients in raltitrexed/oxaliplatin group had significantly higher partial response (RR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.17-2.00, P=0.002), overall response rate (RR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.82, P=0.006), disease control rate (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.29, P=0.009) and lower progressive disease (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.84, P=0.002) when compared to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin group. Occurrence of severe anemia (RR=2.23, 95% CI: 1.38-3.59, P=0.0001), asthenia (RR=2.29, 95% CI: 1.36-3.84, P=0.002), hepatic disorders (RR=7.51, 95% CI: 1.30-43.56, P=0.02), and nausea/vomit (RR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.03-2.81, P=0.04) were significantly higher with the raltitrexed arm treatment, while frequencies of grade 3/4 alopecia (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.50, P<0.00001) and stomatitis/mucositis (RR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31, P<0.00001) were increased in the 5-fluorouracil group.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen leads to an equivalent overall survival and response rates with acceptable toxicities compared to traditional 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Raltitrexed can be a treatment option for these patients when 5-fluorouracil-based regimens are not tolerated or inappropriate.

Targeting thymidylate synthase in colorectal cancer: critical re-evaluation and emerging therapeutic role of raltitrexed

INTRODUCTION

5-fluorouracil continues to be the cornerstone of treatment for colorectal cancer. Although fluoropyrimidines are generally considered as well-tolerated drugs, severe toxicities can be a major clinical problem, and the recommended prolonged infusion of 5-fluorouracil provokes discomfort in patients. Raltitrexed (Tomudex), a quinazoline analogue of folinic acid, is a selective and direct thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor with a convenient 3-weekly schedule of administration.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, through critical insight into the mechanism of action and main clinical experiences, the authors suggest the necessity to reconsider raltitrexed as a valuable anticancer drug and as a suitable option for colorectal cancer. The authors highlight its emerging therapeutic role in clinical practice for patients with fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity or a significant history of cardiac disease.

EXPERT OPINION

This review discusses if TS could still be a relevant target for colorectal cancer in the era of molecular therapy and if raltitrexed should still be considered a drug with a life-threatening toxicity. Furthermore, this review discusses the principal combination clinical experiences of raltitrexed and its emerging therapeutic role in clinical practice as a suitable option for colorectal cancer patients with fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity or a significant history of cardiac disease.

Tegafur-uracil is a safe alternative for the treatment of colorectal cancer in patients with partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: a proof of principle

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of using tegafur-uracil (UFT) in colorectal cancer patients with partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included five colorectal cancer patients who presented with acute toxicity (grades 3 and 4) after being given the first cycle of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil. The DPD deficiency was confirmed by gene sequencing. After a full recovery from all side effects, we changed the regimen to UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) associated with leucovorin (90 mg/day) for 21 days, with an empirical dose reduction of at least 10% in the first cycle.

RESULTS

We prospectively analysed 22 UFT cycles in 5 patients. We did not observe any episodes of grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The predominant toxicities were of grades 1 and 2 (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea).

CONCLUSION

Here, we demonstrate a complete absence of severe toxicity in all patients and cycles analysed. We believe that UFT is a safe alternative for the treatment of patients with partial DPD deficiency.

A randomized phase II study to compare oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) versus oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (TOMOX) as first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare TOMOX versus FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

191 chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomized to receive TOMOX or FOLFOX4. Patients were evaluated every 3 months and chemotherapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

183 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (92 TOMOX and 91 FOLFOX4). Overall response rate was 45.6 and 36.3 % (p = 0.003) for TOMOX and FOLFOX4, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in overall survival (15.6 and 17.2 months; p = 0.475); progression-free survival (7.7 and 8.7 months; p = 0.292), and response duration (6.4 and 7.6 months; p = 0.372) for TOMOX and FOLFOX4, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (p < 0.0001) and leukopenia (p = 0.028) were more common with the FOLFOX4 regimen, while hepatic disorders and asthenia were higher in TOMOX group (p = ns). There were two treatment-related deaths in the FOLFOX4 arm and one in the TOMOX arm. Quality of life analysis based on the SF-36 revealed differences between the two regimens for physical and mental composite scores after 6 weeks, and for body pain and emotional role functioning after 6 and 12 weeks; all of these favored the FOLFOX4 arm (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TOMOX and FOLFOX4 seem to have similar efficacy and are well tolerated in the first-line treatment for advanced CRC with different profiles of toxicity. The convenient TOMOX regimen may offer an alternative to fluoropyrimidine-based regimens.

Oxaliplatin plus dual inhibition of thymidilate synthase during preoperative pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma: long-term outcome

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin (OXA) plus dual inhibition of thymidilate synthase during preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with poor prognosis for rectal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-three patients with the following characteristics, a clinical (c) stage T4, cN1-2, or cT3N0 of ≤5 cm from the anal verge and/or with a circumferential resection margin (CRM) of ≤5 mm (by magnetic resonance imaging), received three biweekly courses of chemotherapy with OXA, 100 mg/m2; raltitrexed (RTX), 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 900 mg/m2 (31 patients) or 800 mg/m2 (32 patients); levo-folinic acid (LFA), 250 mg/m2 on day 2, during pelvic RT (45 Gy). Pathologic response was defined as complete pathological response (ypCR), major (tumor regression grade(TRG) 2 to 3, with ypCRM-ve and ypN-ve) or minor or no response (TRG4 to -5, or ypCRM+ve, or ypN+ve). Adjuvant 5-FU/LFA regimen was given in cases of cT4, ypN+ve, or ypCRM+ve.

RESULTS

Overall, neutropenia (40%) and diarrhea (13%) were the most common grade≥3 toxicities, and tolerability was better with a 5-FU dose reduction. No significant difference in pathologic response was seen according 5-FU dosage: overall, a ypCR was obtained in 24 (39%) patients, and a major response in 20 (32%) patients. The 5-year probability of freedom from recurrence was 80% (95% confidence interval, 68%-92%); it was 56% for the minor/no response group, while it was around 90% for both the ypCR and the major response group.

CONCLUSIONS

OXA, RTX, and 5-FU/LFA administered during pelvic RT produced promising early and long-term results in rectal carcinoma patients with poor prognosis. The postoperative treatment strategy applied in our study supports the risk-adapted approach in postoperative management.

Acute coronary syndrome associated with continuous 5-Fluorouracil infusion in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer-a case report with a discussion on this clinical dilemma

INTRODUCTION

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the backbone of colorectal cancer (CRC) systemic therapy since the great majority of recommended regimens include its administration. A clinical picture consisting of chest pain, sometimes cardiac enzyme elevation, electrocardiogram abnormalities consistent with myocardial ischemia, and normal coronary angiogram associated with 5-FU administration have been infrequently reported. The clinical dilemma is: which chemotherapy regimen should we use in CRC patients with a previous acute coronary syndrome (ACS) associated with 5-FU?

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a 55-year-old otherwise healthy woman with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma who presented an ACS probably secondary to arterial vasospasm while receiving continuous intravenous 5-FU infusion (mFOLFOX6 regimen). After the ACS, the patient was treated with raltitrexate plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and subsequently with irinotecan plus cetuximab with no other cardiac event.

CONCLUSION

The risk of cardiotoxicity associated with 5-FU is low but real. The probable mechanism is arterial vasospasm, as suggested by our case report. Both the use of the TOMOX regimen and irinotecan plus cetuximab seems to be safe regimens to be considered in this clinical scenario.

The Combination of Raltitrexed (Tomudex) and Mitomycin-C in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer — A Phase II Study

AIMS

To investigate the combination of raltitrexed and mitomycin-C as first-line chemotherapy treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phase II study.

RESULTS

In total, 22 patients were treated with a combination of raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and mitomycin-C 7 mg/m2 every 6 weeks for up to 24 weeks. The study was closed early for safety reasons as there were three unexpected treatment-related deaths. The overall response rate was 20%, and a further 40% achieved stable disease. The median time to progression was 3.9 months and the median overall survival time was 11.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the potential for increased toxicity, the combination of raltitrexed and mitomycin-C cannot be recommended as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphism (Ile105Val) predicts cumulative neuropathy in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes involved in the detoxification of a variety of chemotherapeutic drugs, including platinum derivatives. Genetic polymorphisms of GSTs have been associated with enzyme activity variations. Thus, a study was done to investigate the relationship between GST polymorphisms and oxaliplatin-related cumulative neuropathy in gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ninety patients were included. Clinical neurologic evaluation was done at baseline and before each cycle of treatment. We determined genetic variants for GSTP1 exon 5 (Ile105Val), GSTP1 exon 6 (Ala114Val), GSTM1 (homozygous deletion), and GSTT1 (homozygous deletion). We conducted analyses in a subgroup of 64 patients receiving a minimal cumulative dose of 500 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin to examine whether the GST polymorphisms are associated with oxaliplatin-related cumulative neuropathy.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving a minimal cumulative dose of 500 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, 15 patients showed clinically evident oxaliplatin-related cumulative neuropathy scored grade 3 according to an oxaliplatin-specific scale. The oxaliplatin-related cumulative neuropathy scored grade 3 was significantly more frequent in patients homozygous for the GSTP1 105Ile allele than in patients homozygous or heterozygous for the GSTP1 105Val allele (odds ratio, 5.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-30.74; P = 0.02). No association was found with respect to any of the GSTM1, GSTT1, or GSTP1 exon 6 genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggest that the 105Val allele variant of the GSTP1 gene at exon 5 confers a significantly decreased risk of developing severe oxaliplatin-related cumulative neuropathy.

Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Out of every 17-18 individuals in the US, one develops colorectal cancer (CRC) in their lifetime. Of individuals diagnosed with CRC, > 50% present or develop metastatic disease, which, if untreated, is associated with 6-9 months median survival. Although surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for CRC, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic or unresectable disease. For nearly three decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the chemotherapy of choice for treatment of CRC. However, the response rates to single 5-FU therapy have been suboptimal with an objective tumour response of 10-20%. Attempts have been made to improve the efficacy of 5-FU by either schedule alteration (protracted infusion versus intravenous push) or biochemical modulation with leucovorin (LV). Continuous infusion induced more tumour regression and prolonged the time-to-disease progression with some significant impact on survival (11.3 versus 12.1 months; p < 0.04). 5-FU/LV resulted in a significant increase in overall response rates and in the prolongation of disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting, although severe toxicities represent a major clinical problem. The last 10 years have seen the addition of several new agents such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, bevacizumab and cetuximab. The prognosis has significantly improved with the addition of these agents, with median survivals now > 20 months. This review paper focuses on irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed when used alone and in combination.

Biweekly oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid combination chemotherapy during preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase I-II study

Oxaliplatin (OXA), raltitrexed (RTX), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) have shown activity in metastatic colorectal cancer, radioenhancing effect and synergism when combined. We evaluated a chemotherapy (CT) combination of OXA, RTX and FU/FA during preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Fifty-one patients with LARC at high risk of recurrence (T4, N+ or T3N0 ⩽5 cm from anal verge and/or circumferential resection margin ⩽5 mm) received three biweekly courses of CT during pelvic RT (45 Gy). Surgery was planned 8 weeks after CT-RT. Recommended doses (RDs) determined during phase I were utilised in the subsequent phase II trial, where the rate of tumour regression grade (TRG) 1 or 2 was the main end point. No toxic deaths occurred, and severe toxicity was easily managed. In phase II, RDs delivered in 31 patients were OXA 100 mg m⁻² and RTX 2.5 mg m⁻² on day 1, and FU 900 mg m⁻² and LFA 250 mg m⁻² on day 2. Main severe toxicities by patients were grade 4 neutropenia (23%) and grade 3 diarrhoea (19%). In 71% (95% confidence limits, 52–86%) of patients, TRG1 (13) or TRG2 (9) was obtained. All patients are alive and recurrence-free after a median follow-up of 29 months. Combination of OXA, RTX and FU/FA with pelvic RT has an acceptable toxicity and a high clinical activity in LARC and should be studied further in patients at high risk of recurrence.

Raltitrexed-eloxatin salvage chemotherapy in gemcitabine-resistant metastatic pancreatic cancer

Limited information on salvage treatment in patients affected by pancreatic cancer is available. At failure, about half of the patients present good performance status (PS) and are candidate for further treatment. Patients >18 years, PS ⩾50, with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) <12 months received a combination of raltitrexed (3 mg m⁻²) and oxaliplatin (130 mg m⁻²) every 3 weeks until progression, toxicity, or a maximum of six cycles. A total of 41 patients received 137 cycles of chemotherapy. Dose intensity for both drugs was 92% of the intended dose. Main grade >2 toxicity was: neutropenia in five patients (12%), thrombocytopenia, liver and vomiting in three (7%), fatigue in two (5%). In total, 10 patients (24%) yielded a partial response, 11 a stable disease. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 14.6%. Median survival was 5.2 months. Survival was significantly longer in patients with previous PFS >6 months and in patients without pancreatic localisation. A clinically relevant improvement of quality of life was observed in numerous domains. Raltitrexed–oxaliplatin regimen may constitute a treatment opportunity in gemcitabine-resistant metastatic pancreatic cancer. Previous PFS interval may allow the identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from salvage treatment.

Phase II randomised trial of raltitrexed-oxaliplatin vs raltitrexed-irinotecan as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

The purpose of this phase II randomised trial was to determine which of two schemes, raltitrexed-irinotecan or raltitrexed-oxaliplatin, offered better activity and less toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 94 patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC were included and randomised to receive raltitrexed 3 mg m⁻² followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻² on day 1 (arm A), or CPT-11 350 mg m⁻² followed by raltitrexed 3 mg m⁻² (arm B). In both arms treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed an overall response rate of 46% (95% CI, 29.5–57.7%) for arm A, and 34% (95% CI, 19.8–48.4%) for arm B. Median time to progression was 8.2 months for arm A and 8.8 months for arm B. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 69% of patients included in arm A were still alive, compared to 59% of those included in arm B. Overall, 31 patients (65%) experienced some episode of toxicity in arm A and 32 patients (70%) in arm B, usually grade 1–2. The most common toxicity was hepatic, with 29 patients (60%) in arm A and 24 patients (62%) in arm B, and was grade 3–4 in four (8%) and four (9%) patients, respectively. In all, 14 patients (29%) from arm A and 24 patients (52%) from arm B had some grade of diarrhoea (P<0.03). Neurologic toxicity was observed in 31 patients (64%) in arm A, and was grade 3–4 in five patients (10%), while a cholinergic syndrome was detected in nine patients (19%) in arm B. There were no differences in haematologic toxicity. One toxic death (2%) occurred in arm A and three (6.5%) in arm B. In conclusion, both schemes have high efficacy as first-line treatment in metastatic CRC and their total toxicity levels are similar. Regimens with raltitrexed seem a reasonable alternative to fluoropyrimidines.

Survey of oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity using an interview-based questionnaire in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

New chemotherapy regimens for patients with colorectal cancer have improved survival, but at the cost of clinical toxicity. Oxaliplatin, an agent used in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, causes acute and chronic neurotoxicity. This study was performed to carefully assess the incidence, type and duration of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity.

Methods

A detailed questionnaire was completed after each chemotherapy cycle for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase I trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine. An oxaliplatin specific neurotoxicity scale was used to grade toxicity.

Results

Eighty-six adult patients with colorectal cancer were evaluated. Acute neuropathy symptoms included voice changes, visual alterations, pharyngo-laryngeal dysesthesia (lack of awareness of breathing); peri-oral or oral numbness, pain and symptoms due to muscle contraction (spasm, cramps, tremors). When the worst neurotoxicity per patient was considered, grade 1/2/3/4 dysesthesias and paresthesias were seen in 71/12/5/0 and 66/20/7/1 percent of patients. By cycles 3, 6, 9, and 12, oxaliplatin dose reduction or discontinuation was needed in 2.7%, 20%, 37.5% and 62.5% of patients.

Conclusion

Oxaliplatin-associated acute neuropathy causes a variety of distressing, but transient, symptoms due to peripheral sensory and motor nerve hyperexcitability. Chronic neuropathy may be debilitating and often necessitates dose reductions or discontinuation of oxaliplatin. Patients should be warned of the possible spectrum of symptoms and re-assured about the transient nature of acute neurotoxicity. Ongoing studies are addressing the treatment and prophylaxis of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity.

The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: Main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which support the need for an European Consensus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

During the past decades staging and treatment of rectal cancer are used different in Europe and in North America. To promote a process to integrate the daily practice with the best evidence of the literature an International Conference was organized in Italy. Agreement between Experts, Centres, and specialists who participated in the Conference are reported.

METHODS

Five aspects were analyzed and a questionnaire was tailored for this purpose. The questionnaire had 159 questions. During the Conference, at the beginning of each Session, the moderators showed the answers from the Experts and the Centres, and, at the end of the session, the audience voted in all controversial issues. Agreements were scored at three levels: minimum, if it was between 51 and 74% of votes for each group; moderate, between 75 and 94%; large, more than 94%.

RESULTS

The main results are: staging: endoanal ultrasound was considered as mandatory in T staging, in the evaluation of sphincter infiltration, and in the restaging of T after chemoradiotherapy (chRT). Magnetic Resonance Imaging is mandatory in the evaluation of mesorectal fascia infiltration. Endoscopy had a moderate agreement for the definition of tumour location, and the barium enema as optional. Digital rectal examination is complementary for staging and PET-CT investigational for T, N and yT staging. Preoperative radiotherapy: for T4 stage chRT was always the preferred treatment, often with moderate agreement, for any tumour location and N status. For T3, chRT received the same agreement except for high location and N0-N1. For T2 stage, N2 and positive nodes outside the mesorectum, chRT received minimum agreement for low and middle tumours; for high tumours only positive nodes outside the mesorectum was agreed upon. Preoperative radiotherapy, negative specimen and sphincter preservation: chRT was agreed by many for all T stages and N presentations of lower third tumours, except for T1-2 N0-N1. Postoperative treatments: the selection for these treatments often received moderate agreement according to the infiltration of surrounding organs, positive nodal status and circumferential radial margins. Therapy of metastatic disease: an agreement was found for FOLFOX as first-line therapy and for FOLFIRI as second-line, although comparative studies show similar activity of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This process represents an expertise opinion process that may contribute to increased scientific debate and to promote the development of 'guidelines', 'clinical recommendations' and ultimately a Consensus on the evolving approach to rectal cancer treatment.

Clinical management of oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity

In recent years, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy protocols, particularly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX or FUFOX), have emerged as the standard of care in first- and second-line therapy of advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Although oxaliplatin by itself has only mild hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects, its clinically dominating toxicity affects the peripheral sensory nervous system in the form of 2 distinct types of neurotoxicity: (1) a unique, frequent, acute sensory neuropathy that is triggered or aggravated by exposure to cold but at the same time is rapidly reversible without persistent impairment of sensory functions; (2) the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin, a cumulative, chronic sensory neurotoxicity that resembles that of cisplatin with the important difference of its being more rapidly and completely reversible. This chronic sensory neurotoxicity is highly predictable, being closely associated with the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin that is administered. Various strategies have been proposed to prevent or treat oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The stop-and-go concept uses the predictability and reversibility of neurologic symptoms to allow patients to stay on an oxaliplatin-containing first-line therapy for a prolonged period. Several neuromodulatory agents such as calcium-magnesium infusions; antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine, gabapentin, and venlafaxine; amifostine; a-lipoic acid; and glutathione have demonstrated some activity in the prophylaxis and treatment of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. However, randomized trials demonstrating a prophylactic or therapeutic effect on oxaliplatin's cumulative neurotoxicity are still lacking. The predictability of neurotoxicity associated with oxaliplatin-based therapy should allow patients and doctors to develop strategies to manage this side effect in view of the individual patient's clinical situation. This is of increasing importance, because the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX will conceivably further prolong the progression-free survival achieved with FOLFOX so that neurotoxicity and not tumor progression could become the dominating treatment-limiting issue in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer.

First-Line Treatment with Irinotecan and Raltitrexed in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The combination of irinotecan and raltitrexed is safe and active in 5-fluorouracil-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), with the advantage of its convenient three-weekly schedule. The aim of this multicenter phase II study was to assess its efficacy and toxicity in first-line treatment.

METHODS

Between May 2000 and March 2001, 62 previously untreated patients received irinotecan (350 mg/m(2)) plus raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)), with courses repeated every 21 days. Objective response was assessed every three courses, and treatment maintained until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 331 cycles were administered, with a median of five cycles per patient (range, 1-16). Seventeen patients achieved a partial response and 2 a complete response, for an overall intention-to-treat response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval, 18-44%). The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity per patient was diarrhea (27%), emesis (13%), anemia (12%), neutropenia (9%), and asthenia (7%). Three patients (5%) died from treatment-related adverse events (diarrhea plus neutropenia). The median potential follow-up is now 37 months. Median survival was 12.2 months, and median time to progression was 6.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of irinotecan plus raltitrexed is an easy comfortable schedule for patients with metastatic CRC, but both efficacy and toxicity results seem suboptimal for first-line treatment.

Chemoradiation with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in preoperative treatment of stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: Phase I and II studies

PURPOSE

Two separate studies were conducted, the first to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose and the second the efficacy of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin in conjunction with preoperative chemoradiation in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 48 patients received radiotherapy (50 Gy) administered to the posterior pelvis 5 d/wk for 5 weeks. Combination raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (60 to 130 mg/m(2)) was administered on Days 1, 19, and 38.

RESULTS

The recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 130 mg/m(2) (maximal tolerated dose not reached). No patients developed Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 9 patients (18.7%). It was hematologic in 1 patient and GI in 1 patient; 7 patients had an asymptomatic increase of transaminase. Surgery was performed in 47 (98%) of 48 patients. Of the 47 patients, 42 underwent sphincter-saving surgery; in 19, the tumor at diagnosis was located <30 mm from the anorectal ring. Chemoradiation in combination with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin produced high rates of tumor response. The overall tumor downstaging rate was 73% for T and N stages. A complete pathologic tumor response (pT0) or microscopic tumor foci (pTmic) was observed in 28 patients. The tumor regression grade (TRG), using the Mandard scoring system, was TRG1 in 16 patients (43.2%), TRG2 in 12 (32.4%), TRG3 in 12 (32.4%), TRG4 in 6 (16.2%), and TRG5 in 1 patient (2.7%).

CONCLUSION

Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combined with pelvic radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.

Raltitrexed plus weekly oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter non-randomized phase ii study

AIM

The primary aims of this study were activity and toxicity evaluation of a new raltitrexed and oxaliplatin-based regimen, as a first-line chemotherapy, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Survival evaluation was considered a secondary endpoint.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were enrolled into this phase II trial. Treatment consisted of raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 iv on d 1 and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 iv on d 1 and d 8 every 3 wk.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (45.5%) achieved a response [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.1% to 54.1%], 18 (40.9%) had stable disease, and only 6 (13.6%) developed progressive disease. After a median follow-up time of 14.7 mo (range 6.3-18.6 mo), the median time to disease progression was 6 mo (range 2.0-16.7) (95% CI: 4.4-7.6) and the overall survival was 14.8 mo (range 3-23) (95% CI: 11.2-18.4). Neutropenia was the most common hematological side effect, while transient AST/ALT increase, neurotoxicity, asthenia, and diarrhea were the most common nonhematological side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirmed that oxaliplatin administered weekly plus raltitrexed is an active combination in newly diagnosed patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma that merits further investigation versus the classic schedule in a randomized, phase III trial.

Fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of published studies

Fatigue is a subjective experience that affects everybody. In healthy individuals, it can be considered a physiological response to physical or psychological stress. In people with specific diseases, however, fatigue often represents one of the most significant problems. Fatigue can be caused by many factors, both intrinsic to the patient and extrinsic, such as therapeutic interventions. This review, based on published studies, has been conducted with the aim of presenting a critical discussion of the available information on the characteristics, causes and potential treatments of fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The incidence of fatigue in these patients, the methods for measuring and evaluating fatigue, and possible therapeutic options are discussed. An appraisal of the toxicity of various chemotherapeutic agents is also presented. Although fatigue is now an ever more considered aspect of the toxicity of chemotherapy, it remains difficult to establish what standard should be used to make a quali-quantitative evaluation of this symptom. Furthermore, in the absence of a clear demonstration of the efficacy of some therapies, the management of cancer-related fatigue remains poorly defined (except for the treatment of anemia-related fatigue). New randomized clinical trials are necessary to indicate the best strategies for tackling this important problem.

Oxaliplatin: a review of its use in combination therapy for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is the only platinum compound to show clinical activity in colorectal cancer. The efficacy of a combination of oxaliplatin with various schedules of fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as first- or second-line treatment for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer has been investigated in large phase III trials. FOLFOX4 (an oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen) as first-line therapy (n = 795) was superior to irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL). Response rates were 45% vs 31%, and median progression-free survival duration was 8.7 vs 6.9 months. The survival advantage shown by FOLFOX4 over the irinotecan combination (median survival duration 19.5 vs 14.8 months) may be confounded by differences in post-study treatment but equivalent efficacy is supported by another phase III trial of oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations. As first-line therapy, oxaliplatin added to various 5-FU/FA regimens more than doubled the response rates from 16-22.6% to 48.3-53% and the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA than 5-FU/FA alone (7.9-9 versus 5.3-6.2 months, respectively). In disease resistant to irinotecan-based therapies, the oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) regimen had superior efficacy to 5-FU/FA alone in a pivotal phase III trial (n = 816). Response rates and median durations of progression-free survival were 9.6% vs 0.7% and 5.6 vs 2.6 months, respectively. An oxaliplatin-induced cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy (evident when total dose reaches approximate, equals 800 mg/m(2)) is dose limiting. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicities in oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA-recipients were neutropenia (up to 48%) and neurological toxicities (up to 18%). Gastrointestinal effects (diarrhoea [ approximate, equals 12%], nausea, vomiting, or mucositis/stomatitis [up to 6%]) are manageable. Withdrawals from oxaliplatin treatment were due to neuropathy (up to 10%), diarrhoea and/or vomiting (1%) or cutaneous toxicity (1%).

CONCLUSION

As first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA consistently improves response rates and progression-free survival compared with various regimens of 5-FU/FA alone. The significant survival advantage shown by oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA (FOLFOX4) compared with first-line therapy with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL) is encouraging but may require further confirmation. Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA produces a significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival than 5-FU/FA in patients failing irinotecan-based therapies, and as such is also a useful second-line treatment. Although cumulative neurotoxicity is dose limiting, oxaliplatin has a manageable tolerability profile. Oxaliplatin as first- or second-line therapy is a valuable addition to the limited, but expanding, armamentarium of cytotoxic agents useful in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

New oxaliplatin-based combinations in the treatment of colorectal cancer

The synergism between oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer raises the prospect of further clinically effective combinations. Phase I/II trials of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin have established this combination (XELOX) as an effective treatment for advanced disease, with response rates of over 50% in first line therapy. Phase III studies of XELOX are now in progress, while further studies are investigating the combined use of oxaliplatin and a second oral fluoropyrimidine, UFT, after positive phase I/II results. Studies of combined oxaliplatin and irinotecan treatment have reported response rates varying from 25% to 60% in second-line therapy of treatment resistant metastatic disease, and 42% in first line therapy. The optimum dosing combination of these two agents has yet to be determined however, and in many patients it is likely that greater overall survival will be achieved by using them in successive lines rather than in combination. Clinical studies have also demonstrated clinically significant response rates when oxaliplatin is combined with other agents including raltitrexed and mitomycin C. Alongside these novel chemotherapeutic combinations, a range of biological therapies is now being investigated in combination with oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer. Cetuximab (C225) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits signalling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a pathway that has been associated with a variety of pathological process in cancer including dysregulated growth, differentiation, angiogenesis, cell motility and cell adhesion. Studies of second-line therapy combining oxaliplatin and cetuximab in advanced disease and in patients with unresectable liver-only metastases are in progress in the United States. A phase I/II study is also investigating the combined use of oxaliplatin and ZD1839 ('Iressa'), a small molecule inhibitor of the EGFR specific tyrosine kinase activating the same pathways. Anti-angiogenesis agents are also being studied intensely. A key angiogenic pathway in the stimulation of tumour growth is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, inhibited by the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. Phase II first line and phase III second line studies of oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab are now in progress. Oxaliplatin is being investigated in combination with a number of other classes of biological agent, including the proteasome inhibitor PS-341. The sudden appearance of a wide range of chemotherapeutic and biological agents with activity against colorectal cancer presents many challenges to the current system of clinical trials, given the large number of permutations requiring prospective testing. However, by building upon the encouraging results achieved using oxaliplatin plus 5FU/leucovorin, the introduction of new agents will eventually translate into significantly improved clinical outcomes.

Raltitrexed-induced hepatotoxicity: multivariate analysis of predictive factors

Raltitrexed (Tomudex; TOM) hepatotoxicity is usually characterized by a transient and self-limiting increase in transaminase levels. How this may condition daily clinical practice is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate predictive factors of TOM hepatotoxicity. In total, 130 patients were treated at two medical oncology institutions with TOM (3 mg/m2) (52 patients) or TOM plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) (100 mg/m2 day 1 or 70 mg/m2 day 1, 8) (78 patients). A multinomial logistic regression (adjusted for multilevel data) was performed (on all administered chemotherapy courses) to assess the dependence of hepatic toxicity on a set of clinical factors correlated with patient, disease and treatment characteristics. Creatinine clearance was calculated by the Cockcroft formula before each chemotherapy course. Most of the patients presented colorectal cancer (95%) and metastatic disease (93%). Out of the 130 patients, 41 were aged 70 or more, while 119 (91.5%) had a good performance status (PS) (ECOG 0 or 1). Before chemotherapy, liver metastases were present in 78 (60%) patients and elevated transaminase in 25 (19%). A total of 584 courses were administered (252 TOM and 332 TOMOX). National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1/2 and 3/4 transaminase toxicity was observed in 62 and 20% of patients, respectively. To control transaminase increase, glutathione (GSH) or ademethionine (SAMe) was administered in 96 and 129 cycles, respectively. Hepatotoxicity conditioned delays (a week or more) in 60 (10%) chemotherapy cycles and was the reason for the discontinuation of chemotherapy in eight (6%) patients. Among the factors evaluated with multivariate analysis, sex, age, PS, creatinine clearance, previous chemotherapy treatment, presence of liver metastases and oncology centre were not significantly associated with TOM hepatotoxicity. Elevated baseline transaminase levels (p=0.001), number of chemotherapy cycles (p<0.001), TOM cumulative dose (p=0.018), unprolonged intervals between courses (p<0.001) and TOMOX regimen (p<0.001) emerged as factors predictive of hepatotoxicity. In the same analysis, GSH (p<0.001) and SAMe (p<0.001) were hepatoprotective agents. This study confirmed TOM-based hepatotoxicity as a clinical relevant side-effect and a major factor for treatment delays or discontinuation. Predictive and protective factors listed above could assist the management of this toxicity that has probably been underestimated until now.