A randomised multicentre trial of modified CHOP versus MCOP in patients aged 65 years and over with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients older than 80 years diagnosed with DLBCL in China over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

The treatment strategy for elderly patients older than 80 years with DLBCL has not been defined yet because of poor treatment tolerability and lack of data. The aim of this trial was to retrospectively investigate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients older than 80 years diagnosed with DLBCL in China over a 10-year period.

METHODS

This trial comprised 57 patients, aged ≥ 80 years, who were initial diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from 2007 to 2017. They received at least four cycles of reduced-dose R-CHOP21 (Rituximab 375 mg/m² day 0, Cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m² day1, Epirubicin 35 mg/m² day 1, Vincristine 1 mg day 1, and Prednisone 50 mg/m² days 1-5). An observational population-based, cohort study was performed.

RESULTS

The median age was 82.5 years (range 80-90 years ) and the overall response rate was 73.7%. With a median 36.4-month follow-up, 2-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival were 74.3% and 70.9%, respectively. Using rigorous multivariate analysis, we concluded that NCCN-IPI ≥ 5 was the only predictive poor prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

High response rate was concluded on very elderly DLBCL patients (≥ 80 years old) with reduced-dose R-CHOP. However, the very elderly patients with NCCN-IPI score ≥ 5 would lead to poor outcome.

Low-dose trofosfamide plus rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: a single center experience

Background

Rituximab plus combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is broadly accepted as standard for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, there is sparsely data concerning the management of elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of treatment with rituximab and low-dose trofosfamide in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with DLBCL who were not suitable for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens or who did not consent to aggressive treatment. The choice regarding the qualification for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen was left to the estimation of the treating physicians.

Results

Eleven patients with a median age of 83 years (range, 75–90 years) were included. The age-adjusted international prognostic index was low risk in one patient, low-intermediate in four patients, high-intermediate in three patients, and high risk in 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for response. Five patients (45%) achieved a complete response, three (27%) a partial response, one (9%) stable disease, and two (18%) progressive disease. The estimated 1-yr overall survival was 54.5%, and the estimated 1-yr progression-free survival 45.5%, however, three patients (27%) were alive without evidence of disease at 16–20 months from start of treatment. Main toxicity was leukopenia (36% grade III or IV), whereas grade III/IV non-hematological adverse events did not occur.

Conclusions

Due to its potency and low toxicity, trofosfamide/rituximab might represent an alternative therapy for DLBCL of elderly patients not suitable for R-CHOP. This observation, however, should be confirmed in a larger patient population within a prospective clinical trial.

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma in Nottinghamshire U.K.: prognosis of subtypes defined in the WHO-EORTC classification

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PCBCL), with the exception of large B-cell lymphoma of leg type and intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, are associated with an excellent prognosis. These lymphomas have become much better understood in recent years leading to the publication in 2005 of the World Health Organization-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative frequency of occurrence of subtypes of PCBCL in a defined population, and the survival of patients with these subtypes.

METHODS

During the period 1987-2009, 61 consecutive patients with PCBCL were identified from the Nottingham Lymphoma Registry (population 1·1 million). After histological review, the number of patients with each subtype was as follows: marginal zone, 18; follicle centre, 14; diffuse large B cell, leg type, 16; diffuse large B cell, other sites, 12; and intravascular large B cell, one.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year lymphoma-specific survival for patients with marginal zone lymphoma was 100%. The only patient with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma died from widespread disease in spite of chemotherapy. The 4-year lymphoma-specific survival for follicle centre cell lymphoma was 90%. Patients with the other subtypes had the following 5-year lymphoma-specific survival rates: diffuse large B cell, leg type, 61% and diffuse large B cell, other, 40%. The median age at diagnosis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type was 82 years and as a consequence the 5-year overall survival was only 15%. There was a 3·4-fold increase in the incidence of PCBCL from the period 1987-1997 to the period 1998-2009.

CONCLUSIONS

PCBCL is a rare disease (incidence around three per million population per year). It is, in our view, essential that it is diagnosed by a pathologist with an interest in cutaneous lymphoma and that the very different prognosis of the individual subtypes is appreciated by the treating clinician.

CNOP (mitoxantrone) chemotherapy is inferior to CHOP (doxorubicin) in the treatment of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (meta-analysis)

Mitoxantrone has a broad anti-tumour activity including lymphoma with potentially less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin, which may be of particular importance in elderly patients. However, an important issue is whether mitoxantrone is as efficacious as doxorubicin in the treatment of aggressive lymphomas. Through search of several relevant databases and contacts with lymphoma investigators worldwide, we identified nine randomised studies of previously untreated patients comparing CHOP and CNOP chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Five trials were included where doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) was compared with mitoxantrone (10-12 mg/m2) and the interval between chemotherapy courses was 3-4 wk. In none of these trials rituximab was used. Odds ratios of complete remission (CR) were pooled using a fixed effects model, and odds ratios of overall survival (OS) were pooled using a random effects model. CNOP was significantly inferior to CHOP with regard to CR rate. CNOP was also inferior, but not significantly to CHOP with regard to OS. No formal testing of side effects could be made. However, the two regimens were equally myelosuppressive. Clinical evidence of symptomatic congestive heart disease was not more frequent among patients treated with CHOP. However, gastrointestinal toxicities and alopecia were more common in this group. CHOP chemotherapy is more efficacious than CNOP at equitoxic (myelosuppression) doses. CHOP is, however, associated with more alopecia and gastrointestinal toxicity.

A phase II study of VEPA/FEPP chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma in elderly patients: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9203

The Lymphoma Study Group (LSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial of LSG12 therapy for 45 elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma to clarify whether LSG12 reduces severe infection without lowering the complete response (CR) rate in comparison with LSG4. LSG12, which consisted of a regimen of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, doxorubicin, vindesine, etoposide, and procarbazine (VEPA/FEPP), excluded bleomycin and methotrexate of LSG4 therapy, reduced the dosages of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and increased etoposide and procarbazine dosages instead. Inclusion criteria consisted of a patient age of 70 to 75 years, a World Health Organization performance status of 0 to 2, and acceptable organ function. The treatment was completed in 47% of the patients and terminated early for disease progression in 20% and for toxicity in 16%. The CR rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-74%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 42% (95% CI, 27%-57%), and the median OS time was 4.3 years. Leukopenia of grade 3 to 4 occurred in 98% of the patients, and severe infection occurred in 9%. Eight patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody showed no severe hepatic toxicity and had a better CR or OS rate than the 37 HCV-negative patients. Although the outcomes of LSG12 met our expectations with a reduction in severe infection and equivalent CR and OS outcomes compared with LSG4 and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), the possibility of a regimen more beneficial than LSG12 for aggressive lymphoma in the elderly patient should be explored because of frequent hematologic toxicity and poor compliance in LSG12.

Long-term results of a multicenter randomized, comparative trial of modified CHOP versus THP-COP versus THP-COPE regimens in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

In treating elderly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients, it is particularly important to use drugs that have a low incidence of adverse events and high efficacy. In this multicenter study, THP (pirarubicin)-COP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) was compared to two thirds dosage of full CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) regimen with regard to both adverse events and efficacy. For a third group, etoposide (E) was added to the THP-COP regimen (THP-COPE) in order to achieve high dose-intensity. Subjects were 486 previously untreated patients, aged 65 or older (range, 65-92 years; median, 74 years), with NHL. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive THP-COP, two thirds CHOP, or THP-COPE. Four hundred and forty-three patients were assessed for response and followed for 8 years after the last subject registered. The complete remission rates for the THP-COP, CHOP, and THP-COPE groups were 42.5%, 41.4%, and 48.0%, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or progression-free survival among these 3 groups. In aggressive lymphoma, there was also no difference in complete response (CR) rate (45.3% in THP-COP, 44.9% in CHOP, 48.0% in THP-COPE), overall survival, and progression-free survival among these groups. The 5- and 8-year survival rates for all patients were 29.4% and 18.7%, respectively. The 5- and 8-year survival rates for patients with aggressive lymphoma were 27.4% and 17.4%, respectively. Although long-term survival for patients with aggressive lymphoma on our regimens was not worse compared to previous reports, the CR rate was lower. Because severe adverse events were not observed, higher dose chemotherapy may be directed to achieve better CR rates. In patients with T-cell-type lymphoma, the CR rate was greater after treatment with THP-COP (51.4%) or THP-COPE (57.7%) compared to treatment with CHOP (19.4%). Pirarubicin may be more useful for T-cell lymphoma than doxorubicin. Because adverse cardiac events were reported only in CHOP, adverse cardiac events might be low in the THP group.

Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas in Elderly Patients

The roles of evolving treatment strategies for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) in elderly patients are still not well defined and their effects on the overall epidemiology of the disease are still not clear. Three questions arise when discussing the management of NHL in elderly patients. First, should older patients be treated with the same regimens usually administered to younger patients? Second, are health outcomes of elderly patients similar to those usually observed in young patients, particularly response rate and overall survival? Third, which strategies should be adopted to improve overall health outcomes? Periodic review of the literature and updated data on the management of NHL in elderly patients may provide an answer to all these queries. In essence, older patients must be treated with the same intensive approaches that are usually reserved for younger patients. The results reported in randomized controlled clinical trials are consistent with the capability of older patients to exhibit overall response rate, event-free survival, and overall survival similar to those observed in their younger counterparts. Combining chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies seems to be the main optional strategy for better outcomes in elderly patients. In contrast, knowledge concerning the management of indolent lymphomas in elderly patients is still lacking, and available clinical data are limited in this setting, especially in patients with poor prognostic factors who may need an immediate therapeutic intervention.