Phase II study of pemetrexed disodium (Alimta®) administered with oral folic acid in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Folate, folic acid, and chemotherapy-induced toxicities: a systematic literature review

Folate metabolism is a target for various chemotherapeutic drugs. Folate and its synthetic variant folic acid are B-vitamins. To what extent these vitamins impact treatment tolerance in patients with cancer remains unclear. A systematic literature review was conducted on intake and status of folate and folic acid in relation to chemotherapy-induced toxicities in children and adults with cancer. A total of 6,231 publications were identified, of which 40 publications met the inclusion criteria. In 12 out of 22 studies focusing on antifolates, a deficient folate status and lower folate and folic acid intake were associated with a higher risk of toxicities. In 8 out of 14 studies focusing on fluoropyrimidine treatments, a higher folate status and intake were associated with a higher risk of toxicities. These findings might explain interindividual differences in treatment tolerance and highlight the importance of evaluating nutritional status in oncology care.

Study on the role and pharmacology of cuproptosis in gastric cancer

Objective

Gastric cancer has a poor prognosis and high mortality. Cuproptosis, a novel programmed cell death, is rarely studied in gastric cancer. Studying the mechanism of cuproptosis in gastric cancer is conducive to the development of new drugs, improving the prognosis of patients and reducing the burden of disease.

Methods

The TCGA database was used to obtain transcriptome data from gastric cancer tissues and adjacent tissues. GSE66229 was used for external verification. Overlapping genes were obtained by crossing the genes obtained by differential analysis with those related to copper death. Eight characteristic genes were obtained by three dimensionality reduction methods: lasso, SVM, and random forest. ROC and nomogram were used to estimate the diagnostic efficacy of characteristic genes. The CIBERSORT method was used to assess immune infiltration. ConsensusClusterPlus was used for subtype classification. Discovery Studio software conducts molecular docking between drugs and target proteins.

Results

We have established the early diagnosis model of eight characteristic genes (ENTPD3, PDZD4, CNN1, GTPBP4, FPGS, UTP25, CENPW, and FAM111A) for gastric cancer. The results are validated by internal and external data, and the predictive power is good. The subtype classification and immune type analysis of gastric cancer samples were performed based on the consensus clustering method. We identified C2 as an immune subtype and C1 as a non-immune subtype. Small molecule drug targeting based on genes associated with cuproptosis predicts potential therapeutics for gastric cancer. Molecular docking revealed multiple forces between Dasatinib and CNN1.

Conclusion

The candidate drug Dasatinib may be effective in treating gastric cancer by affecting the expression of the cuproptosis signature gene.

The critical role of circular RNAs in drug resistance in gastrointestinal cancers

Nowadays, drug resistance (DR) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, as the main reason for cancer-related mortality worldwide, has become a serious problem in the management of patients. Several mechanisms have been proposed for resistance to anticancer drugs, including altered transport and metabolism of drugs, mutation of drug targets, altered DNA repair system, inhibited apoptosis and autophagy, cancer stem cells, tumor heterogeneity, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Compelling evidence has revealed that genetic and epigenetic factors are strongly linked to DR. Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) interferences are the most crucial epigenetic alterations explored so far, and among these ncRNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs) are the most emerging members known to have unique properties. Due to the absence of 5' and 3' ends in these novel RNAs, the two ends are covalently bonded together and are generated from pre-mRNA in a process known as back-splicing, which makes them more stable than other RNAs. As far as the unique structure and function of circRNAs is concerned, they are implicated in proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, metastasis, and DR. A clear understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for circRNAs-mediated DR in the GI cancers will open a new window to the management of GI cancers. Hence, in the present review, we will describe briefly the biogenesis, multiple features, and different biological functions of circRNAs. Then, we will summarize current mechanisms of DR, and finally, discuss molecular mechanisms through which circRNAs regulate DR development in esophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Active Learning: A Shift from Passive Learning to Student Engagement Improves Understanding and Contextualization of Nutrition and Community Health

Challenging the notion of “teaching by telling,” active learning utilizes a student-oriented approach by emphasizing the concept of knowledge retention through peer interaction. To further examine the potential of active learning, we created a workshop based on didactic education and student collaboration. Participants included undergraduate students from traditionally underrepresented and disadvantaged backgrounds. The workshop was part of our summer academic enrichment program run in an urban, medically underserved community. The workshop focused on clinical and biochemical nutrition, wherein students synthesized information by discussing dietary choices and the socioeconomic aspects of nutrition. Student reception of the workshop was adjudged by anonymous surveys. The survey questions were designed to gauge how the workshop objectives were achieved. Cronbach alpha (0.276) confirmed that there was more than a single theme contained in the questions. The majority of students (97%) agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives: (1) acquire basic clinical knowledge, (2) gain a better understanding of nutrition, (3) formulate a linkage between clinical nutrition and disease, and (4) benefit from peer interaction. Students’ performance in the post-quiz (100% correct answers) had improved significantly compared to the pre-quiz (25% correct answers) suggesting acquisition, understanding and application of nutrition aspects taught in the workshop. Overall, the present study demonstrated the engagement and understanding of students with respect to learning about nutrition and community health in an active learning setting. These types of active-learning-based sessions may have broad applicability for any academic discipline to improve student engagement and knowledge retention.

Patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for drug testing in cancer therapy

Several patient-derived tumor models emerged recently as robust preclinical drug-testing platforms. However, their potential to guide clinical therapy remained unclear. Here, we report a model called patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTCs). PTCs result from the self-assembly and proliferation of primary epithelial, fibroblast, and immune cells, which structurally and functionally recapitulate original tumors. PTCs enabled us to accomplish personalized drug testing within 2 weeks after obtaining the tumor samples. The defined culture conditions and drug concentrations in the PTC model facilitate its clinical application in precision oncology. PTC tests of 59 patients with gastric, colorectal, or breast cancers revealed an overall accuracy of 93% in predicting their clinical outcomes. We implemented PTC to guide chemotherapy selection for a patient with mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma who experienced recurrence with metastases after conventional therapy. After three cycles of a nonconventional therapy identified by the PTC, the patient showed a positive response. These findings need to be validated in larger clinical trials, but they suggest that the PTC model could be prospectively implemented in clinical decision-making for therapy selection.

Medicines associated with folate-homocysteine-methionine pathway disruption

Folate is vital for cell development and growth. It is involved in one-carbon transfer reactions essential for the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines. It also acts in conjunction with cobalamin (vitamin B₁₂) as a fundamental cofactor in the remethylation cycle that converts homocysteine to methionine. A deficiency in folate or vitamin B₁₂ can lead to elevated homocysteine level, which has been identified as an independent risk factor in several health-related conditions. Adequate folate levels are essential in women of childbearing age and in pregnant women, and folate deficiency is associated with several congenital malformations. Low folate levels can be caused by dietary deficiencies, a genetic predisposition or treatment with medicines that affect folate concentration. Women who are pregnant or of child-bearing age commonly use medicines, so it is important to identify the basic biochemical mechanisms by which medicines interfere with the folate-homocysteine-methionine pathway. This review focuses on prescription medicines associated with folate disruption. It also summarizes their undesirable/toxic effects. Recommendations regarding folate supplementation during medical therapy are also reviewed.

Folate During Antifolate Chemotherapy: What We Know... and Do Not Know

The nutrient folate is essential for normal cell growth and development. Enzymes that require folate as a cofactor have been common targets for chemotherapeutic agents. Limited clinical guidance is available regarding optimal levels of dietary or supplemental folate intake during antifolate chemotherapy to meet the goals of minimizing treatment-related toxicity yet preserving treatment effectiveness. Patients with higher folate intake may experience less treatment-related toxicities; however, the concern is that folate may interfere with the effectiveness of the antifolate treatment and possibly support tumor growth. This article will review folate and antifolate metabolism and review the current body of knowledge regarding the interactions between folates and antifolates. Future research in this area should include evaluation of pretreatment folate status and dietary and supplemental folate intake before, during, and after treatment.

Pemetrexed-Induced Rash May Be Prevented by Supplementary Corticosteroids

Pemetrexed, a chemotherapeutic drug, is highly active in non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Unfortunately, rashes are more commonly associated with pemetrexed than other chemotherapies, and it is recommended that patients receive corticosteroids (8 mg/d of dexamethasone) for 3 d, including the day of pemetrexed administration (day 1). However, the efficacy of corticosteroids in this context has not been fully verified. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the medical records of 78 patients who received pemetrexed between April 2009 and March 2014, to confirm whether supplementary corticosteroids prevented rash development. The incidence of rash was lower in the 47 patients who received supplementary corticosteroids (after day 1) compared with the incidence among the 31 patients who did not receive supplementary corticosteroids (19.1% vs. 38.7%). The average cutoff dosage of supplementary corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 was 1.5 mg/d of dexamethasone, as calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the odds ratio was 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.94). Administration of ≥1.5 mg of corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 significantly reduced the severity of the rash compared to no supplementary treatment (grades 2/3, 13.3% vs. 33.3%, p<0.05). However, increasing the dose of corticosteroids had no additional effect on rash development. These results suggest that ≥1.5 mg of supplementary dexamethasone on day 2 and day 3 (in addition to day 1) may be necessary for preventing pemetrexed-induced rash, but high doses of dexamethasone (e.g., 8 mg/d) are unnecessary.

Study of Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancers

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed based chemotherapy in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers as first-line, second-line or third-line therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2011 to January 2015, we recruited 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 19 patients with advanced ovary cancer, 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer,5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer,5 patients with advanced cervical cancer and 1 patient with advanced tongue cancer in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute.All of them were pathologically confirmed and treated with pemetrexed based chemotherapy. After two cycles of treatment,efficacy and safety can be evaluated.

RESULTS

For pemetrexed based regimens,including 76 patients with 6 kinds of advanced cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Complete remission represents CR, partial remission represents PR, stable disease represents SD, progressive disease represents PD. Among 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 4 patients chose pemetrexed based regimens as second-line treatment,1 of them was PR,the other 3 got SD. The last 25 patients made use of this chemotherapy as third-line treatment, except one patient could not be assessed, 2 of them got PR,6 of them got SD,the remaining 16 of them finally were PD.19 patients with advanced ovary cancer,5 patients used this regimens as second-line treatment, 3 of them got PD,the remaining patients got SD, respectively. The last 14 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment,. RR (CR+PR) was 28.5%. Among 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer, 2 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment,both of them got PR.4 of them used this chemotherapy as second-line regimen, except 2 patients could not be assessed,the remaining 2 was PD at last. The last 11 patients was third-line users, RR (CR+PR) was 18.2%. Among 5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used in 1 patient as first- line treatment and 1 patient as second-line treatment. The curative effect was SD and PD, respectively. 3 patients accepted pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment, 2 of them got PD as results and another was SD. Among 5 patients with advanced cervical cancer, just 1 patient adopted pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment, whose curative effect was PR.2 patients chose this chemotherapy regimens as second-line treatment. Both of them got PD as their consequence. The last 2 patients made use of the regimens as third-line treatment, the effect of them was PD and SD, respectively. The one who with advanced tongue cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used as second-line treatment, and the consequence was PD. About 71.1% patients experienced bone marrow suppression. Among them, 5 patients reached 4 grade. Other toxicity of pemetrexed were neurotoxicity, fatigue, diarrhea, dysphagia and vomiting. No treatment related death occurred with pemetrexed-based treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed based chemotherapy has considerable effect in patients with advanced cancers such as breast cancer,esophageal cancer and ovary cancer. More randomly clinical trials are needed to verify the results.

Further study on pemetrexed based chemotherapy in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC)

OBJECTIVE

To further observe the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, combined with Irinotecan or oxaliplatin or cisplatin in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer as second-line or third-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

From September 2013 to February 2014 we recruited 50 patients with advanced gastric cancer, with stage IV disease or postoperative recurrence, or unresectable. Then treated with pemetrexed based chemotherapy. After two cycles of treatment, efficacy and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pemetrexed based chemotherapy was used as second-line in 33 patients, RR(CR+PR) is 41.2%. And achieved 36.4% when used as third-line. Overall response rate of 50 patients treated with Pemetrexed based treatment was 38% (CR+PR). Treatment related side effects were bone marrow suppression, vomiting, hepatic dysfunction and malaise.No treatment related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pemetrexed based chemotherapy is active and is well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study on pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in treating patients with metastatic gastric cancer not responding to prior palliative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study was to determine the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed based chemotherapy in treating patients with metastatic gastric cancer who failed to respond to first and (or) second line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Metastatic gastric cancer patients who failed first and (or) second line chemotherapy, were enrolled. All patients were recruited from Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, and were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; on day 1), and a platinum (or irinotecan) every 3 weeks until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. Evaluation on efficacy was conducted after two cycles of chemotherapy using the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors. Toxicity was recorded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

RESULTS

From Jun 2011 to May 2013, 23 patients were enrolled. All eligible 23 patients completed at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy with pemetrexed based chemotherapy, and were evaluable. Their median age was 55 years (range 40 to 78 years). Seventeen patients were male and 6 female. Three patients (13%) achieved partial response, five patients (22%) stable, 15 patients (65%) with disease progression, and none with complete response. Grade 2 neutrophil suppression occurred in 4.3%, grade 3 in 13% of patients, and no grade 4 was reported. Thrombocytopenia was encountered as follows: 4.3% grade 2, 4.3% grade 3 and 4.3% grade 4. Incidence of anemia was 34.8% in grade 2, 8.7% grade 3 and 0% grade 4. Only 4.3% of patients required packed red blood cell infusion. Elevated transaminase were 4.3% in grade 2 and 0% in grade 3 or 4. Other toxicity included oral mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed based chemotherapy is mildly effective in treating patients with metastatic gastric cancer with tolerable toxicity.

Pemetrexed as a component of first-, second- and third- line chemotherapy in treating patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The current research was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed given continuously as a basement agent for first-, second- to third line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Insitute, were enrolled. All received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; on day 1), and another chemotherapieutic agent every 3 weeks until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. Then the patients were changed to a second line chemotherapy that was still based on pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and another chemotherapeutic agent differing from the first line example, until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. When third line chemotherapy was needed, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and another new chemotherapeutic agent were combined until disease progression. Evaluation of efficacy was conducted after two cycles of chemotherapy using the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors. Toxicity was recorded according to NCI Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to September 2013, 15 patients were enrolled. Their median age was 56 years (range 43 to 77 years). Eight patients were male and 7 female. Five patients (33.3%) achieved PR, while 6 patients (40.0%) remained stable, no CR on first line; and 1 PR (7.7%), 5 stable (38.5%) were recorded when pemetrexed was ordered in second line; 5 patients (41.7%) were stable after pemetrexed was combined in third line; no complete response was observed. Main side effects were grade 1 to 2 neutrophil suppression and thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included elevated transaminase and oral mucositis, but no treatment related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed continuously as a basement agent from first-, second- to third line chemotherapy is mildly effective in treating patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with tolerable toxicity.

Pemetrexed for previously treated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a prospective phase II study

Background:

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. There were debates on the value of the second-line and beyond chemotherapy by the time we designed this trial. So we designed this phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods:

Thirty-four patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer were enroled in the study. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg m⁻² every 21 days until the presence of progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity.

Results:

A total of 34 patients were enroled in the study; 34 were eligible for toxicity and 30 for response. The response rate was 13.3%, 13.3% patients achieved a partial response, 50.0% achieved stable disease and 36.7% had a PD as the best response. The median overall survival time and median progression-free survival time was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.8–9.5 months) and 2.2 months (95% CI 2.0–5.5 months), respectively. Most haematologic and non-haematologic toxicity were grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 toxicity included fatigue, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, weight loss, anorexia and transaminase elevation.

Conclusions:

The monochemotherapy of pemetrexed is active and well tolerated when used in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

A Prospective Phase I/II Study: Combination Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Pemetrexed as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Two standard single-agent chemotherapy treatments (docetaxel and pemetrexed) were combined in this trial and administered as second-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining docetaxel with pemetrexed.

METHODS

Six patients were enrolled between August 2007 and March 2009 with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The dose-escalation model included a pemetrexed infusion on day 1 of 200-300 mg/m(2) followed by infusion of docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 at doses from 20 to 30 mg/m(2). Primary study endpoints included efficacy and safety variables, also progression-free, overall and 1-year survival and time to progression.

RESULTS

The study was abandoned due to adverse effects defined in the protocol. The major toxicities were all of grade 3 and included fatigue, stomatitis/mucositis, diarrhea and in one case, an episode of febrile neutropenia. Two patients died during the study, but not as a direct result of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that docetaxel or pemetrexed monotherapies should continue to be considered the standard second-line chemotherapy treatment against NSCLC. The results of this study warrant no further investigation into this particular combination treatment due to the severe toxicity effects encountered.

Prediction of cancer drugs by chemical-chemical interactions

Cancer, which is a leading cause of death worldwide, places a big burden on health-care system. In this study, an order-prediction model was built to predict a series of cancer drug indications based on chemical-chemical interactions. According to the confidence scores of their interactions, the order from the most likely cancer to the least one was obtained for each query drug. The 1(st) order prediction accuracy of the training dataset was 55.93%, evaluated by Jackknife test, while it was 55.56% and 59.09% on a validation test dataset and an independent test dataset, respectively. The proposed method outperformed a popular method based on molecular descriptors. Moreover, it was verified that some drugs were effective to the 'wrong' predicted indications, indicating that some 'wrong' drug indications were actually correct indications. Encouraged by the promising results, the method may become a useful tool to the prediction of drugs indications.

Phase II study of preoperative pemetrexed, carboplatin, and radiation followed by surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal junction tumors

INTRODUCTION

Based on favorable preliminary clinical data and the need to identify effective, well-tolerated neoadjuvant regimens for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, this clinical trial was undertaken.

METHODS

This phase II study tested 500 mg/m neoadjuvant pemetrexed intravenously and carboplatin with an area under the curve of 6 intravenously on days 1 and 22 in conjunction with concomitant radiation of 5040 centigray, which was given in 28 daily fractions of 180 centigray. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response.

RESULTS

This trial closed early because, during an interim analysis, the primary endpoint fell short. However, 26 eligible patients were accrued. Twenty (74%) were men. Performance scores of 0, 1, and 2 were seen in 16 (59%), 9 (33%), and 2 (7%), respectively. Among eligible patients, 6 of 26 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9-44%) demonstrated a pathologic complete response. Twenty-two underwent a complete cancer resection. The median survival was 17.8 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2-30.7 months). In the neoadjuvant setting, 22 patients had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event, and 8 patients had at least one grade 4 event. Postoperatively (within 30 days of surgery), there were three deaths, one grade 4 event (thrombosis), and three grade 3 events.

CONCLUSIONS

The neoadjuvant regimen tested within this phase II trial demonstrated antineoplastic activity but fell short of yielding a complete pathologic response rate that merits further testing.

A phase I/II and pharmacogenomic study of pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric carcinoma

This phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum recommended dose of pemetrexed when given in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and the efficacy, toxicity and association of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) variants with this pemetrexed--cisplatin combination, in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric carcinoma. Patients 18-70 years of age, with stage IV disease or post-surgery recurrence, no earlier palliative chemotherapy, 0 or 1 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, were included. The cisplatin dose was 75 mg/m. In phase I, the initial dose of pemetrexed was 600 mg/m, escalated in 100 mg/m increments. In phase II, efficacy, including overall response rate, overall survival, as well as toxicity and MTHFR pharmacogenetics were investigated. Phase I enrolled 16 patients; 700 mg/m was defined as pemetrexed recommended dose. Thirteen serious adverse events were reported; the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were haematologic (10 of 13, 76.9%). Phase II enrolled 73 patients, 69 qualified for safety and 68 for efficacy analysis; 65 for pharmacogenomic analysis. Overall response rate was 23.5% (14.1%, 35.4%), disease control rate 55.9%, median overall survival 11.8 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-18.5 months), progression-free survival 4.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-7.1 months), and median response duration 5.4 months. Patients with MTHFR A1298C variants had median overall survival of 6.6 months, significantly shorter than patients with the wild type (median 18.5 months, P=0.001). The pemetrexed--cisplatin combination in patients with advanced gastric cancer generates modest efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile. The reduced overall survival in patients with MTHFR A1298C polymorphism variants deserves further investigation.

A dose-escalation study of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of pemetrexed and docetaxel in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were treated with escalating doses of pemetrexed (400-600 mg/m(2) as a 10-min intravenous infusion) and docetaxel (65-85 mg/m(2) as a 1-h intravenous infusion) on day 1, every 3 weeks. An expanded accrual at the level of the recommended dose (RD) had been scheduled. Forty-two patients with metastatic NSCLC were enrolled in the phase I study and 20 additional patients at the RD level. The MTD could not be reached even at the doses of 550 and 85 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively, which are higher than the recommended dose for each drug given as a single agent. Therefore, the RD was defined at 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Among the 164 administered chemotherapy cycles (phase I part), there were three episodes of febrile neutropenia whereas 13 (7.9%) and 11 (6.7%) cycles were complicated with grade III and IV neutropenia, respectively. Three patients developed grade III/IV thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild with grade III fatigue occurring in three (6.7%) patients. There was no toxic death. The favorable toxicity profile of the regimen was confirmed in patients treated at the RD level. Overall, one complete (CR) and 13 partial responses (PR) (overall response rate = 23; 95% C.I:12.4-33.5%] were documented. The combination of pemetrexed and docetaxel seems to be an effective regimen in NSCLC with acceptable and manageable toxicity, which merits further investigation.

Successful treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma in a Meckel's diverticulum with pemetrexed plus carboplatin

A 42-year-old man was found to have an adenocarcinoma arising from ectopic gastric mucosa in Meckel's diverticulum, as diagnosed with surgical pathology. Recurrence was recognized with massive ascites at 1 year and 6 months after surgery. Chemotherapy in the first and second lines was not effective. In the third line of chemotherapy, pemetrexed and carboplatin were both administered and this resulted in a good response for massive ascites. This palliative therapy was effective and safe.

Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study

BACKGROUND

This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Median age was 62 years (range 26-76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3-7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.

Does an optimal therapeutic sequence exist in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

A growing percentage of patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer who progressed after first-line chemotherapy still have a good performance status and require second-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of the state of the art of second-line therapeutic options is presented.

METHODS

The scope of the review is to give an update on the therapeutic options currently available for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among chemotherapeutic drugs docetaxel and pemetrexed have been approved for second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Although the drugs are equiactive in terms of response rate and survival parameters the latter has a clear-cut advantage in terms of tolerability and quality of life. Therefore, pemetrexed is considered the best second-line therapeutic option in order to avoid severe side effects. Among biologic agents the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefinitib and erlotinib have been largely tested, but only the latter has been approved for second- and third-line treatment. Erlotinib has been reported to be particularly active in patients with adenocarcinoma, in females, in patients of Asian ethnicity and in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and it is also active in the third-line setting. At present, no direct head to head comparison of erlotinib with any chemotherapeutic agent has been performed. A rational decision tree may therefore include pemetrexed or docetaxel (the former preferred for tolerability) or erlotinib as standard second-line therapy. Erlotinib has been also shown to be active as third-line treatment: however, in cases of patients with clinical characteristics suggesting a good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib may be employed in an earlier phase.

Pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean cancer study group multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate enzyme inhibitor, which has activity against a variety of tumors, including advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PemCis) combination in the treatment of AGC in Korean patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, single arm, open label study. Patients with no prior palliative chemotherapy received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1, every 3 weeks plus folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation. Response rate was assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients evaluable for efficacy, 13 had partial response for an overall response rate of 26% (95% CI, 14.6-40.3%) and 15 (30%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 2.8 months (95%CI, 2.2-4.4 months), and median overall survival was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-10.4 months). Of the 51 patients evaluable for safety, the most frequent NCI-CTC grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia in 49% of patients (25% of cycles) and anorexia in 10% of patients (4% of cycles).

CONCLUSION

PemCis has a modest activity and acceptable toxicity profile in patients with AGC. Clinical trials with different combinations and dose regimens are, therefore, warranted.

Clinical activity of pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate anticancer agent

Pemetrexed is a new generation antifolate anticancer agent that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes required for production of DNA and RNA intermediates. Early studies showed significant hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities with this agent. However it was found that many of these toxicities related to functional folate status and could be markedly reduced through routine supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B(12), without adversely affecting efficacy. Phase III studies with pemetrexed have established a clinical role for this drug as a single agent in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and in combination with cisplatin for the frontline treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clinical trials of pemetrexed alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents have shown considerable activity in many tumor types including colorectal, pancreatic and breast cancer, and urothelial tumors.

A Dose Escalation Study of Gemcitabine plus Pemetrexed Administered Biweekly in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly administration of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalated doses of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (starting doses 1,250 and 300 mg/m(2), respectively) both given on days 1 and 15 in cycles of 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were treated at 7 dose levels. The MTD was reached at the dose of 1,750 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and 450 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed. Dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade III hematological toxicities. One partial response in a pretreated patient with ovarian cancer was observed, while 4 other patients experienced stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The biweekly administration of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed at the recommended MTDs is safe, well tolerated and demonstrates antitumor activity which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.

Systemic therapy for gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: present status and future directions

Gastric cancer is a major worldwide problem and is a leading cause of death. The incidence of distal gastric cancer is declining; however, there has been a rapid rise in the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, which is a more aggressive entity. Combination chemotherapy has significant activity in the treatment of both of these diseases, improving overall survival and quality of life. Despite these improvements, median survival remains at approximately 9 months in patients who are diagnosed at stage IV. This review examines recent advances in the treatment of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer, newer agents and the potential agents that are in development, which can be logically applied to the treatment of this devastating disease.

Role of pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed was approved for the treatment of relapsed or chemotherapy refractory non-small cell lung cancer patients, as it produced similar response and survival outcomes and less toxicity as compared to taxotere. Pemetrexed in combination with platinum analogs or with gemcitabine or vinorelbine, produce equivalent responses and overall survival results compared to combinations of platinum analogs with other drugs. The role of bevacizumab and the inhibitors of epithelial growth factor receptor also should be evaluated in selected patients with NSCLC treated with pemetrexed combinations. Further increases in drug dose may be possible using transfer of drug resistance genes in hematopoietic stem cells.

Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed in February 2004 for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with cisplatin in patients with unresectable disease or for whom curative surgery is not an option. Pemetrexed is the first agent approved for the treatment of MPM. In August 2004, pemetrexed was approved as a second-line, single-agent treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this article were to summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of pemetrexed, and to review its current and potential roles in therapy for MPM, NSCLC, and other oncologic conditions.

METHODS

Relevant English-language literature was identified through searches of PubMed (1966-December 2004), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (January 1995-December 2004). Search terms included pemetrexed, Alimta, MTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514, mesothelioma, MPM, non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In addition to published literature, abstracts and posters presented at national and international scientific meetings were reviewed.

RESULTS

Myelosuppression was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity of pemetrexed reported in Phase I studies. Identification of the correlation between poor folate status and increased pemetrexed toxicity in a multivariate analysis led to the requirement of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation for patients in all pemetrexed studies, with a resulting noted decrease in pemetrexed toxicity. A single, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial compared the efficacy of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in the treatment of MPM. Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination and 16.7% with single-agent cisplatin (P < 0.001). The median survival time for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination was significantly longer at 12.1 months versus 9.3 months for cisplatin alone (P = 0.02). One international, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial in patients with NSCLC compared single-agent pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Overall response rates (9.1% and 8.8%) and median survival (8.3 months and 7.9 months) did not differ between pemetrexed and docetaxel (P = 0.105 and P = 0.226, respectively). Hematologic adverse effects-grade 3/4 neutropenia (40.2% vs 5.3%; P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001), and neutropenic infections (3.3% vs 0%; P = 0.004)-were significantly greater in the docetaxel-treated patients than in the pemetrexed-treated patients, as was alopecia (37.7% vs 6.4%; P < 0.001). Results of an international, multicenter Phase III trial of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer indicate that the combination is no more efficacious than single-agent gemcitabine. Results in other disease states are still preliminary.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor types as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Efficacy for the treatment of MPM in combination with cisplatin has been demonstrated, and approval as a second-line agent in NSCLC was based on response rate as a surrogate end point for survival. The addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation markedly reduced.

Pemetrexed, a novel antifolate therapeutic alternative for cancer chemotherapy

Pemetrexed is a newly approved antifolate agent for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a PubMed/MEDLINE database search to identify relevant literature from January 1966-April 2005. Bibliographies from identified references were searched as well, as were abstracts from the 2004 and 2005 proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. We discuss the pharmacology of pemetrexed, describing its mechanism of action and comparing it with methotrexate. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pemetrexed are described to provide a better understanding of the properties of this drug. Therapeutic uses are assessed, beginning with the approved indications of MPM and NSCLC. However, pemetrexed has been studied in numerous phase II trials for other types of solid malignancies, and completed trials are reviewed. Data on adverse effects and drug interactions are also provided. Finally, dosing and administration are reviewed, including appropriate premedication. Premedication, including administration of steroids and vitamin supplements, has been shown to decrease the frequency and severity of pemetrexed toxicities. Pemetrexed should be used as a standard of care for unresectable MPM and recurrent metastatic NSCLC.

Alteration of pemetrexed excretion in the presence of acute renal failure and effusions: presentation of a case and review of the literature

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with mesothelioma and non small cell lung cancer. As this agent is almost exclusively cleared by renal excretion, trials leading to its approval were conducted in patients with normal renal function. However, this cycle active agent often is administered with cisplatin to patients who may have pleural effusions and ascites. As a result, the potential for drug accumulation in effusions and for accompanying renal insufficiency is real. Recommendations for the management of pemetrexed toxicity in the presence of renal failure have not been established. A case of treatment-related acute renal failure following chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed in a patient with advanced mesothelioma and ascites is presented. Pharmacologic studies in this patient revealed persistent pemetrexed levels in ascites and plasma. This is the first time that significant accumulation of pemetrexed in ascetic fluid has been reported in the literature. Treatment with leucovorin, folate, and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis was initiated. Thymidine and carboxypeptidase were not available. Dialysis was unsuccessful in removing pemetrexed. Theoretical and practical approaches to management of similar cases are presented.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Folic acid supplementation during methotrexate immunosuppression is not associated with early toxicity, risk of acute graft-versus-host disease or relapse following hematopoietic transplantation

Methotrexate (MTX) is used as an immunosuppressive agent for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Concerns that folate intake may impair MTX effectiveness or selectively rescue leukemic cells have led to variations in clinical practice regarding supplemental folic acid during MTX administration. A retrospective, observational study was undertaken to determine the association between folic acid intake (days 0-18 post transplant) and MTX toxicity and efficacy following HCT. The study population consisted of 311 adult patients who received a myeloablative HCT for chronic myelogenous leukemia, all four scheduled doses of MTX, and did not require leucovorin rescue. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the relationships between folic acid intake (days 0-18 post-HCT) and oral mucositis index (OMI) scores, time to engraftment and risk of detectable acute GVHD. No statistically significant differences in mean OMI scores, time to engraftment, risk of acute GVHD, days to acute GVHD, risk of relapse or survival were observed when comparing patients taking, on average, <400 (14%), 400 (58%) or >400 microg (28%) folic acid per day. Our results suggest that concurrent folic acid supplementation does not change MTX effectiveness or toxicity in this patient population.

Gastric cancer: standards for the 21st century

Although the incidence of gastric cancer has been decreasing in the United States, it remains a leading cause of cancer death in the world, only lung cancer causes more deaths worldwide. The combination of relatively low prevalence, lack of pathognomonic symptoms, and lack of defined risk factors are associated with a delay in diagnosis leading to a dismal prognosis. For localized disease, surgery remains a cornerstone of treatment but much controversy remains regarding optimal peri-operative therapy. For advanced disease, several new agents and new combination chemotherapies have offered encouraging results. This paper seeks to review the major topics surrounding gastric cancer and cover the results of recently reported and ongoing trials.

Second-Line Treatment Options in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status

Despite the emergence of several antineoplastic drugs with activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), real progress with first-line therapy has been limited in the last decade. It has proven difficult to demonstrate important differences between third generation two-drug combinations. In contrast, progress with second-line therapy has been significant, especially in the past few years, with pemetrexed showing equivalent activity to docetaxel but with substantially less toxicity. At the same time, much work has been undertaken investigating the efficacy of the small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in the second-line and subsequent-line settings. Erlotinib has been shown to significantly improve survival versus placebo following failure on one or two prior regimens, especially in select or targeted patient populations. Finding the optimal place and patients for these agents in NSCLC treatment will be one of the more fascinating challenges of the next few years.

A semimechanistic-physiologic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for neutropenia following pemetrexed therapy

PURPOSE

The objectives of these analyses were to (1) develop a semimechanistic-physiologic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe neutropenic response to pemetrexed and to (2) identify influential covariates with respect to pharmacodynamic response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 279 patients who received 1,136 treatment cycles without folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation during participation in one of eight phase II cancer trials were available for analysis. Starting doses were 500 or 600 mg pemetrexed per m2 body surface area (BSA), administered as 10-min intravenous infusions every 21 days (1 cycle). The primary analyses included 105 patients (279 cycles) for which selected covariates-including vitamin deficiency marker data (i.e., homocysteine, cystathionine, methylmalonic acid, and methylcitrate [I, II, and total] plasma concentrations)-were available. Classical statistical multivariate regression analyses and a semimechanistic-physiologic population PK/PD model were used to evaluate neutropenic response to single-agent pemetrexed administration.

RESULTS

The timecourse of neutropenia following single-agent pemetrexed administration was adequately described by a semimechanistic-physiologic model. Population estimates for system-based model parameters (i.e., baseline neutrophil count, mean transit time, and the feedback parameter), which mathematically represent current understanding of the process and physiology of hematopoiesis, were consistent with previously reported values. The population PK/PD model included homocysteine, cystathionine, albumin, total protein, and BSA as covariates relative to neutropenic response.

CONCLUSION

These results support the programmatic decision to introduce folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation during pemetrexed clinical development as a means of normalizing patient homocysteine levels, thereby managing the risk of severe neutropenia secondary to pemetrexed administration. The current results also suggest that the addition of vitamin B6 supplementation to normalize patient cystathionine levels may further decrease the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia following pemetrexed administration. The results also suggest the use of folic acid as a means of lessening hematologic toxicity following administration of cytotoxic agents other than antifolates.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ten phase II clinical trials of pemetrexed in cancer patients

PURPOSE

The objectives of these population pharmacokinetic analyses were to (1) assess the overall disposition of pemetrexed, (2) characterize between-patient and within-patient variability and identify influential covariates with respect to pemetrexed pharmacokinetics; and, (3) provide individual empirical Bayesian estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters for use in a subsequent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of neutropenia following pemetrexed administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 287 patients who received 441 cycles without folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation during participation in one of ten phase II cancer trials were evaluated by population pharmacokinetic analysis using NONMEM. Starting doses were 500 or 600 mg pemetrexed per m2 body surface area, administered as 10-min intravenous infusions every 21 days (1 cycle). The model was developed using data from eight of the ten studies. Predictive performance was evaluated using data from the other two studies.

RESULTS

The population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion are well characterized by a two-compartment model. Typical values of total systemic clearance, central volume of distribution, distributional clearance, and peripheral volume of distribution were 91.6 ml/min, 12.9 l, 14.4 ml/min, and 3.38 l, respectively. Based on these parameter estimates, the terminal elimination half-life of pemetrexed was approximately 3.5 h. Renal function was identified as a covariate with respect to total systemic clearance, and body surface area as a covariate with respect to the central volume of distribution.

CONCLUSION

Total systemic exposure (AUC) for a given dose of pemetrexed increases as renal function decreases. Since pharmacodynamic analyses have shown that AUC and not C (max) is the primary determinant of neutropenic response to pemetrexed, this suggests that dose adjustments based on renal function, rather than body surface area, might be considered for pemetrexed.

Cytotoxic effects of pemetrexed in gastric cancer cells

Pemetrexed is a newly developed multitargeted antifolate with promising clinical activity in many solid tumors including gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of pemetrexed and its mode of interaction with cisplatin in gastric cancer cell lines, and to identify genes associated with sensitivity to pemetrexed. The cytotoxic activity of pemetrexed was assessed by tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT assay) and the interaction between pemetrexed and cisplatin was evaluated by the isobologram method. Western immunoblotting and real time RT-PCR analysis of thymidylate synthase (TS), folylpoly-gamma-glutamate synthetase (FPGS) and reduced folate carrier (RFC1) were performed in order to determine whether sensitivity to pemetrexed would be predictable by protein or mRNA expression levels. Pemetrexed was more cytotoxic than 5-fluorouracil, with IC50 between 17 and 310 nM in most of the gastric cancer cell lines examined and the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination resulted in additive or synergistic interaction. The protein expressions of TS, FPGS, and RFC1 were significantly associated with IC50 for 5-fluorouracil, but no such association was found for pemetrexed chemosensitivity. The mRNA expressions of RFC1, FPGS and other target and resistance related genes revealed no significant association with pemetrexed sensitivity. In conclusion, pemetrexed is active against gastric cancer cell lines and the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination showed a synergistic or additive interaction, supporting its clinical use in gastric cancer. Drug sensitivity toward pemetrexed could not be predicted by the expressions of TS, RFC1, or FPGS and we suggest that it is determined by interactions between multiple genes.

Three Emerging New Drugs for NSCLC: Pemetrexed, Bortezomib, and Cetuximab

Despite advances made in cytotoxic chemotherapy, the prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be poor. New, more effective drugs must be identified and developed to improve the outcome of these patients. Three drugs with promising activity in NSCLC are pemetrexed (Alimta; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, http://www.lilly.com), bortezomib (Velcade; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, http://www.mlnm.com), and cetuximab (Erbitux; ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, NY, http://www.imclone.com). Pemetrexed inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase, enzymes necessary for purine and pyrimidine synthesis, thus causing cell-cycle arrest in the S phase. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, interferes with the cytosolic protein degradation machinery, namely the ubiquitin-proteasome complex, causing breakdown of cell-cycle regulators and cell-cycle arrest. Cetuximab is a chimeric mouse-human antibody that inhibits ligand-dependent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, resulting in receptor internalization and inhibition of downstream pathways that, in turn, causes cell growth and progression. All three drugs are approved for different tumor types, and studies defining their role in NSCLC are under way.

Multimodality therapy in mesothelioma: role of chemotherapy

The few long-term survivors of MPM have been cured with radical surgical extirpation often followed by radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin recently was shown to improve survival over treatment with cisplatin alone. Given the size and robustness of that trial, the combination should be the new standard treatment for this cancer. Combined modality approaches to therapy, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, are becoming the standard of care in patients with resectable mesothelioma. Two phase II studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and apparently effective. A third phase II trial will use the combination of pemetrexed plus cisplatin preoperatively followed by surgery and radiation for patients with T1-3 N0-2 mesothelioma. If the statistical analysis of this study shows a measurable pathologic complete response rate and a median survival that exceeds the current expected value of 20 to 24 months, a phase III trial comparing surgery and radiation to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy will be considered.

Abarelix Pemetrexed

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.