Phase II trial of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus

Evolving Treatment Landscape for Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights advances and recent changes in the treatment paradigm for advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for advanced EAC/GEJAC. New targets/agents include immunotherapy, HER-2, claudin18.2, and FGFR2b, with various mechanisms (CAR-T, bispecific mAB, ADCs) altering the treatment landscape against these targets. The approaches to these targets may act together, in sequence, and even synergistically to improve outcomes. Herein, we review the state of the field, including highlighting ongoing clinical trials and additional emerging agents and approaches.

Advances in the Theranostics of Oesophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Oesophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most lethal human malignancies, and it is a more aggressive form of oesophageal cancer (EC) that comprises over 90% of all EC cases in China compared with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The high mortality of ESCC is attributed to the late‐stage diagnosis, chemoradiotherapy resistance, and lack of appropriate therapeutic targets and corresponding therapeutic formulations. Recently, emerging clinical and translational investigations have involved genome analyses, diagnostic biomarkers, and targeted therapy for ESCC, and these studies provide a new horizon for improving the clinical outcomes of patients with ESCC. Here, the latest research advances in the theranostics of ESCC are reviewed and the unique features of ESCC (including differences from EAC, genomic alterations, and microbe infections), tissue and circulating biomarkers, chemoradiotherapy resistance, clinical targeted therapy for ESCC, identification of novel therapeutic targets, and designation of nanotherapeutic systems for ESCC are particularly focused on. Finally, the perspectives for future clinical and translational theranostic research of ESCC are discussed and the obstacles that must be overcome in ESCC theranostics are described.

Safety and short-term efficacy of preoperative FOLFOX therapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who are ineligible for cisplatin

BACKGROUND

The standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) in Japan is docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil. However, patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction and elderly patients are ineligible for a CDDP-containing regimen because of toxicities. Oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) therapy has less renal toxicity than CDDP-containing regimens and does not require hydration. However, there are limited data on preoperative FOLFOX therapy in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with resectable LAESCC who were aged ≥ 75 years or had renal or cardiac dysfunction and received preoperative FOLFOX between 2019 and 2021. FOLFOX was administered every 2 weeks for 3 or 4 cycles and was followed by surgery. Adverse events associated with chemotherapy, the complete resection (R0) rate, relative dose intensity (RDI), and histopathological response were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were eligible. Median age was 77 (range 65-89) years; 68.6% were aged ≥ 75 years, 74.3% had renal dysfunction, and 17.1% had cardiac dysfunction. The RDI was 70.2% and 87.1% for bolus and continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil, respectively and 85.2% for oxaliplatin. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (60.0%) and leucopenia (28.6%). Two patients (5.7%) had febrile neutropenia and grade 3 pneumonia. Thirty-one patients underwent surgery. The R0 resection rate was 87.1%, and there was no histopathological evidence of residual tumor in 16.1%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative FOLFOX had a manageable safety profile and showed favorable short-term efficacy in patients with resectable LAESCC who were ineligible for CDDP-containing treatment.

Phase II Study of S-1 plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) need safer and more efficacious treatments. The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

50 patients with metastatic ESCC who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received S-1 at 40 mg/m2 divided into 2 daily doses for 14 days and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 intravenously, repeated every 21 days with a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

47 patients were assessable for response and 18 patients achieved a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 38.3%. Among those who had objective responses, a large percentage (72.2%) quickly showed remarkable tumor shrinkage during the first 2 cycles. 18 (38.3%) patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, and the median overall survival was 12.0 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate and generally tolerable.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1 plus cisplatin was a well-tolerated and convenient chemotherapy regimen with promising efficacy.

Mutations, Differential Gene Expression, and Chimeric Transcripts in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Show High Heterogeneity

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a frequent and lethal neoplasia. As recent advances in targeted therapy have not improved ESCC prognosis, characterization of molecular alterations associated to this tumor is of foremost relevance. In this study, we analyze, for the first time, the complete genomic profile of ESCC by RNA-seq. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in the investigation and validation sets (78.6% and 67.4%, respectively). Differential expression analysis between tumor and nontumor adjacent mucosa showed 6698 differentially expressed genes, most of which were overexpressed (74%). Enrichment analysis identified overrepresentation of Wnt pathway, with overexpressed activators and underexpressed inactivators, suggesting activation of canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways. Higher WNT7B expression was associated with poor prognosis. Twenty-one gene fusions were identified in 50% of tumors, none of which involving the same genes in different patients; 71% of fusions involved syntenic genes. Comparisons with TCGA data showed co-amplification of seven gene pairs involved in fusions in the present study (~33%), suggesting that these rearrangements might have been driven by chromoanagenesis. In conclusion, genomic alterations in ESCC are highly heterogeneous, impacting negatively in target therapy development.

Natural Borneol Enhances Paclitaxel-Induced Apoptosis of ESCC Cells by Inactivation of the PI3K/AKT

Paclitaxel (PTX) has been used in a variety of malignancies for inhibiting tumor development and improving survival. However, its clinical application is limited due to poor solubility, drug resistance, and gastrointestinal reactions. Natural borneol (NB), as a promoter, could help to improve drug absorption. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate the ability of NB to synergize with PTX to induce human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells apoptosis and the underlying mechanism of synergistic effects. In this study, our findings showed that NB could effectively synergize with PTX to inhibit the survival of ESCC cells by inducing apoptosis. The molecular mechanism by western blotting elucidated that combination treatment with PTX and NB significantly activated apoptotic pathway by triggering upregulation of cleaved caspase-3 expression and downregulation of survivin and P-AKT expression. These results demonstrated that NB could strongly potentiate PTX-induced apoptosis in ESCC cells through suppressing PI3K/AKT pathway. Thus, the combination therapy with NB and PTX might be a promising treatment strategy for human esophageal cancer.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. It has brought about a major public health problem. Many natural agents have been employed in the synergized treatments of esophageal cancer. This study provides a comprehensive way to investigate the ability of borneol to synergize with paclitaxel to induce human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells apoptosis and the underlying mechanism of synergistic effects. The research showed that the combination treatment with some natural agents might be a promising treatment strategy for human esophageal cancer.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma transcriptome reveals the effect of FOXM1 on patient outcome through novel PIK3R3 mediated activation of PI3K signaling pathway

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) presents poor prognosis, and patients diagnosed with this tumor currently lack target treatments. Therefore, in order to identify potential targets for ESCC treatment, we carried out a transcriptome analysis with ESCC and paired nonmalignant surrounding mucosa samples, followed by a master regulator analysis, and further explored the role of the identified central regulatory genes through in vivo and in vitro assays. Among the transcription factors deregulated/enriched in ESCC, we focused on FOXM1 because of its involvement in the regulation of critical biological processes. A new transcriptome analysis performed with ESCC cell lineage TE-1 showed that the modulation of FOXM1 expression resulted in PIK3R3 expression changes, whereas chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that FOXM1 was capable of binding onto PIK3R3 promoter, thus demonstrating that PIK3R3 is a new FOXM1 target. Furthermore, FOXM1 overexpression resulted in the activation of PIK3/AKT signaling pathway through PIK3R3-mediated AKT phosphorylation. Finally, the analysis of the clinic-pathological data of ESCC patients revealed that overexpression of both FOXM1 and PIK3R3 was associated with poor prognosis, but only the latter was an independent prognosis factor for ESCC patients. In conclusion, our results show that FOXM1 seems to play a central role in ESCC carcinogenesis by upregulating many oncogenes found overexpressed in this tumor. Furthermore, PIK3R3 is a novel FOXM1 target that triggers the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in ESCC cells.

Evolving Management Strategies for Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Metastatic or unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent a devastating disease with 5-year survival rate of <5%. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy with platinum-doublet-based regimens is initially effective, patients inevitably progress. Patients often decline rapidly after this initial progression, making later lines of therapy a challenge to successfully administer There have been multiple efforts to incorporate biologic agents, targeting pathways known to be dysregulated in esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, into existing chemotherapy backbones. Other than therapeutics targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), other strategies have failed. Given the mixed success of biologic agents, along with the promise of immunotherapy to generate durable and sometimes complete responses, immune-agent based trials are a major area of interest for patients with this disease. Checkpoint inhibitors blocking programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated modest single-agent efficacy in patients with progressive esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, other approaches such as novel checkpoint combinations, vaccine-based approaches and autologous T cells hold more promise to change the trajectory of disease.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Community Setting-Practice and Outcomes

There has been an alarming rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma which continues to have poor survival rates primarily due to lack of effective chemotherapy and presentation at advanced stages. Over a dozen chemotherapeutic agents are FDA approved for esophageal cancer (EC), and a two or three-drug combination is typically prescribed as first-line therapy for the majority of EC patients, administered either pre or post-operatively with esophageal resection. We have noticed significant variability in adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens used in the community setting. The aim of this study was to review the various drug regimens used in the neoadjuvant setting for EC patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing resection at a single tertiary referral center in the Midwest. A total of 123 patients (stage II–III) underwent esophageal resection after neoadjuvant treatment at the center. Overall, 18 distinct drug regimens were used in 123 patients including two patients who received targeted therapy. Median survival post-surgery for this group was 11.2 months with no single regimen offering a survival advantage. These results reveal an unclear algorithm of how accepted regimens are prescribed in the community setting as well as a dire need for agents that are more effective. Additionally, it was noted that although proteomic markers have been found to predict drug response to 92% of the FDA-approved drugs in EC (12 of 13), according to pathology reports, molecular diagnostic testing was not used to direct treatment in this cohort. We therefore propose potential strategies to improve clinical outcomes including the use of a robust molecular oncology diagnostic panel and discuss the potential role for targeted chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy in the management of EC patients.

Nimotuzumab Combined with Chemotherapy is a Promising Treatment for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

Background

Nimotuzumab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody which has been widely used in cancer treatment. However, the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer patients remain unclear.

Material/Methods

To address this open question, we collected a total data of 21 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2016 in a, retrospective study. The patient characteristics, efficacy safety, and toxicity were evaluated in our study.

Results

We observed 1 (4.8%) patient with complete response, 7 (33.3%) patients with partial response, 9 (42.9%) patients with stable response and 4 (19%) patients with progression response. The objective response rate was 38.1% and disease control rate was 81%. The mean progression-free-survival was 7 months and the 18-month overall survival (OS) was 10%. The incidence rate of anemia and leukopenia was 71.4% and 81%, respectively. Two patients showed the serious adverse event of myelosuppression, with nausea, fatigue, and anorexia. No long-term drug-related toxicity was observed during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy can achieve promising clinical outcomes in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, without accumulation of toxicity and was well-tolerated.

A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%).

Conclusion

The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients.

CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.

Elemental diet plus glutamine for the prevention of mucositis in esophageal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of glutamine (Gln) and an elemental diet (ED) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty patients were randomized to the control group (no treatment: n = 10), Gln group (oral intake of 8910 mg Gln/day: n = 10), or Gln plus ED group (total oral intake of 8862 mg Gln/day, including the Gln in ED: n = 10). Oral administration of Gln and ED began 1 week before chemotherapy and continued during treatment. Oral mucositis was evaluated during 2 cycles of chemotherapy using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade ≥2 oral mucositis was 60 % in the control group, 70 % in the Gln group, and 10 % in the Gln plus ED group. Gln plus ED showed a significant preventive effect on the development and severity of oral mucositis. By multivariate analysis, Gln plus ED and cancer stage were independent factors affecting chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. The percentage of change in body weight and diamine oxidase activity from before chemotherapy was higher in the Gln plus ED group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of Gln plus ED may prevent chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in esophageal cancer patients.

Advances in targeted therapies and new promising targets in esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer, comprising squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. Notably, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased at an alarming rate in the Western world. Unfortunately, the standard first-line chemo-radiotherapeutic approaches are toxic and of limited efficacy in the treatment of a significant number of cancer patients. The molecular analysis of cancer cells has uncovered key genetic and epigenetic alterations underlying the development and progression of tumors. These discoveries have paved the way for the emergence of targeted therapy approaches. This review will highlight recent progress in the development of targeted therapies in esophageal cancer. This will include a review of drugs targeting receptor tyrosine kinases and other kinases in esophageal cancer. Additional studies will be required to develop a rational integration of these targeted agents with respect to histologic types of esophageal cancer and the optimal selection of cancer patients who would most likely benefit from targeted therapy. Identification of AURKA and AXL as key molecular players in esophageal tumorigenesis and drug resistance strongly justifies the evaluation of the available drugs against these targets in clinical trials.

Randomized phase 2 trial of S1 and oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess, in a randomized, phase 2 trial, the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy (ICT) of S1 and oxaliplatin for esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage II, III, or IVA esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to either 2 cycles of ICT (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S1 at 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (46 Gy, 2 Gy/d with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 21 and S1 30 mg/m(2) twice daily, 5 days per week during radiation therapy) and esophagectomy (arm A), or the same CCRT followed by esophagectomy without ICT (arm B). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were randomized (arm A/B, 47/50), 70 of whom underwent esophagectomy (arm A/B, 34/36). The intention-to-treat pCR rate was 23.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-35.6%) in arm A and 38% (95% CI 24.5% to 51.5%) in arm B. With a median follow-up duration of 30.3 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 58.4% in arm A and 58.6% in arm B, whereas the 2-year overall survival rate was 60.7% and 63.7%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during CCRT was more common in arm A than in arm B (35.4% vs 4.1%). The relative dose intensity of S1 (89.5% ± 20.6% vs 98.3% ± 5.2%, P=.005) and oxaliplatin (91.4% ± 16.8% vs 99.0% ± 4.2%, P=.007) during CCRT was lower in arm A compared with arm B. Three patients in arm A, compared with none in arm B, died within 90 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy of S1 and oxaliplatin is an effective chemoradiotherapy regimen to treat esophageal cancer. However, we failed to show that the addition of ICT to the regimen can improve the pCR rate.

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil adjuvant chemotherapy following three-field lymph node dissection for stage II/III N1, 2 esophageal cancer

To determine the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF) in lymph node metastasis-positive esophageal cancer, we retrospectively analyzed 139 patients with stage II/III (non-T4) esophageal cancer with lymph node metastasis (1-6 nodes), who did not receive preoperative treatment and underwent three-field lymph node dissection in the Juntendo University Hospital between December, 2004 and December, 2009. The tumors were histologically diagnossed as squamous cell carcinoma. The patients were divided into two groups, a surgery alone group (S group, 88 patients) and a group that received postoperative DCF therapy (DCF group, 51 patients). The disease-free and overall survival were compared between the groups and a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed. The same analysis was performed for cases classified as N1 and N2, according to the TNM classification. There were no significant differences between the S and DCF groups regarding clinicopathological factors other than intramural metastasis and main tumor location. The presence of intramural metastasis, blood vessel invasion and the number of lymph nodes were identified as prognostic factors. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 55.8 and 57.3%, respectively, in the S group and 52.8 and 63.0%, respectively, in the DCF group. These differences were not considered to be statistically significant (P=0.789 and 0.479 for disease-free and overall survival, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in disease-free and overall survival between the S and DCF groups in N1 cases, both disease-free and overall survival were found to be better in the DCF group (54.2 and 61.4%, respectively) compared to the S group (29.6 and 28.8%, respectively) in N2 cases (P=0.029 and 0.020 for disease-free and overall survival, respectively). Therefore, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with DCF was shown to improve disease-free and overall survival in moderate lymph node metastasis-positive cases (N2), suggesting that the DCF regimen may be effective as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with lymph node metastasis from esophageal cancer.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is a curative treatment option for oesophageal carcinoma, especially in patients unsuitable for surgery. The PRODIGE5/ACCORD17 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the FOLFOX treatment regimen (fluorouracil plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin) versus fluorouracil and cisplatin as part of chemoradiotherapy in patients with localised oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2/3 trial of patients aged 18 years or older enrolled from 24 centres in France between Oct 15, 2004, and Aug 25, 2011. Eligible participants had confirmed stage I-IVA oesophageal carcinoma (adenocarcinoma, squamous-cell, or adenosquamous), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 0-2, sufficient caloric intake, adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function, and had been selected to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either six cycles (three concomitant to radiotherapy) of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), and infusional fluorouracil 1600 mg/m(2) (FOLFOX) over 46 h, or four cycles (two concomitant to radiotherapy) of fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2) per day for 4 days and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1. Both groups also received 50 Gy radiotherapy in 25 fractions (five fractions per week). Random allocation to treatment groups was done by a central computerised randomisation procedure by minimisation, stratified by centre, histology, weight loss, and ECOG status, and was achieved independently from the study investigators. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Data analysis was primarily done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00861094.

FINDINGS

134 participants were randomly allocated to the FOLFOX group and 133 to the fluorouracil and cisplatin group (intention-to-treat population), and 131 patients in the FOLFOX group and 128 in the fluorouracil and cisplatin group actually received the study drugs (safety population). Median follow-up was 25·3 months (IQR 15·9-36·4). Median progression-free survival was 9·7 months (95% CI 8·1-14·5) in the FOLFOX group and 9·4 months (8·1-10·6) in the fluorouracil and cisplatin group (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·70-1·24; p=0·64). One toxic death occurred in the FOLFOX group and six in the fluorouracil-cisplatin group (p=0·066). No significant differences were recorded in the rates of most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the treatment groups. Of all-grade adverse events that occurred in 5% or more of patients, paraesthesia (61 [47%] events in 131 patients in the FOLFOX group vs three [2%] in 128 patients in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group, p<0·0001), sensory neuropathy (24 [18%] vs one [1%], p<0·0001), increases in aspartate aminotransferase concentrations (14 [11%] vs two [2%], p=0·002), and increases in alanine aminotransferase concentrations (11 [8%] vs two [2%], p=0·012) were more common in the FOLFOX group, whereas serum creatinine increases (four [3%] vs 15 [12%], p=0·007), mucositis (35 [27%] vs 41 [32%], p=0·011), and alopecia (two [2%] vs 12 [9%], p=0·005) were more common in the fluorouracil and cisplatin group.

INTERPRETATION

Although chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX did not increase progression-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil and cisplatin, FOLFOX might be a more convenient option for patients with localised oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery.

FUNDING

UNICANCER, French Health Ministry, Sanofi-Aventis, and National League Against Cancer.

Nomogram to predict treatment outcome of fluoropyrimidine/platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The degree of benefit from palliative chemotherapy differs widely among patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (MESCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram to predict survival and aid physicians and patients in the decision-making process regarding treatment options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic variables and treatment outcomes of 239 patients who were diagnosed with MESCC and received either fluorouracil/cisplatin (FP) or capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) as first-line chemotherapy were reviewed. A nomogram was developed as a prognostic scoring system incorporating significant clinical and laboratory variables based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. An independent series of 61 MESCC patients treated with FP served as an independent data set for nomogram validation.

RESULTS

No difference in response rate was observed between the FP group (44.8%) and the XP group (54.2%). Similarly, no significant differences in median progression-free survival and median overall survival were observed between regimen groups. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] status≥2), weight loss (10% of the weight loss for 3 months), low albumin level (≤3.5 g/dL), and absence of previous esophagectomy at the time of chemotherapy were significantly associated with low OS in both groups (p<0.05). Based on these findings, patients were classified into favorable (score, 0 to 90), intermediate (91-134), and poor (>135) prognostic groups. The median survival for those with a favorable ECOG was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8 to 18.6 months), for intermediate 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 11.9 months), and for poor, 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 10.0 months). External validation of the nomogram in a different patient cohort yielded significantly similar findings.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram described here predicts survival in MESCC patients and could serve as a guide for the use of FP/XP chemotherapy in MESCC patients.

New and emerging combination therapies for esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer comprises two different histological forms - squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC). While the incidence of AC has increased steeply in Western countries during the last few years, the incidence of SCC is fairly stable. Both forms differ in pathogenesis and response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Plenty of studies have evaluated new chemotherapy combination regimens in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative setting. In addition, new radiation and chemoradiation protocols have been investigated. Finally, molecular-targeted therapy has been included in several new randomized prospective trials. Therefore, this review presents new data on this topic and critically discusses promising approaches towards a more effective treatment in a disease with a grim prognosis.

Results of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin (DOCOX) ± cetuximab in patients with metastatic gastric and/or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomised Phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction/stomach are treated by combination chemotherapy, with minimal improvements in survival. We evaluated adding cetuximab to combination chemotherapy in these patients.

METHODS

The primary objective was progression-free survival. Secondary objectives were response rate, time to response, duration of response and safety. Treatment Arm 1: docetaxel+oxaliplatin (DOCOX)=docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Arm 2: docetaxel+oxaliplatin+cetuximab (DOCOX+C)=DOCOX with C 400mg/m(2) first dose then 250 mg/m(2) weekly. The protocol was amended to allow collection of tissue to correlate responses with KRAS status.

FINDINGS

One hundred fifty patients were enrolled (75/arm). DOCOX/DOCOX+C: gastric 44%/41%, gastroesophageal junction 51%/55%, both 5%/4%. Response rate/arm: 26.5%/38.0%. Median progression-free survival: 4.7/5.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-5.6/4.3-5.9); 1 year survival: 39.1%/33.0%, median overall survival: 8.5/9.4 months; median duration of response: 7.3/5.6months. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (%) included neutropenia (50%/44%), febrile neutropenia (13%/19%), diarrhoea (12%/17%), fatigue (12%/17%) and leukopenia (7%/14%). Discontinuation was due to progressive disease 39/32 and adverse events 21/34. KRAS was collected on some patients 2 years into the study because of new American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) findings.

INTERPRETATION

Cetuximab added to DOCOX may improve response rate minimally; there appears to be no improvement in progression-free survival, overall survival or 1-year survival. Cetuximab added to DOCOX did not produce clinically significant outcomes. Toxicities were consistent with the study drugs' known safety profiles. KRAS mutation was infrequent; no conclusions can be drawn from KRAS response data. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT00517829.

The effects of ERCC1 expression levels on the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to platinum agents and survival in gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy

Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) is reported to be involved in the sensitivity of cancer cells to platinum-based chemotherapy. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of ERCC1 expression on the chemosensitivity of platinum agents in gastric cancer cell lines, and on survival in gastric cancer patients treated with surgery followed by oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. ERCC1 expression levels were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot analysis, respectively. The chemosensitivity of a series of gastric cancer cell lines to platinum agents in vitro was evaluated using CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit. The apoptotic effect of the drugs was evaluated by double staining with Annexin-V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI). The results demonstrated that the expression levels of ERCC1 mRNA were correlated with the chemosensitivity of platinum agents, and depletion of ERCC1 sensitized the relatively resistant MKN45 cells to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Univariate analyses revealed that patients with low ERCC1 levels had longer relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with high ERCC1 levels (median RFS, 18 vs. 7 months, P=0.001; median OS, 27 vs. 11 months, P=0.001). Multivariate analyses suggested that high ERCC1 expression is an independent prognostic marker of poor RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–4.25; P= 0.026] and OS (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.07–4.55; P=0.031). These results suggest that overexpression of ERCC1 is correlated with platinum drug resistance in gastric cancer cells, and that depletion of ERCC1 sensitizes gastric cancer cell lines to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Gastric cancer patients with low levels of ERCC1 expression demonstrate a benefit from oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Surgical treatment for pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy: experience from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for pulmonary metastases is known to be a safe and potentially curative procedure for various primary malignancies. However, there are few reports regarding the prognostic role of surgical treatment for pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma, especially after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 5 patients who underwent surgical treatment for pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma at our institution. The primary treatment for esophageal carcinoma was definitive CRT, and a complete response (CR) was achieved in all patients.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure for pulmonary metastases was wedge resection, and pathological complete resection was achieved in all 5 patients. The disease free interval after definitive CRT varied from 7 to 36 months, with a median of 19 months. There were no perioperative complications, but postoperative respiratory failure occurred in 1 patient. The postoperative hospital stay varied from 4 to 7 days, with a median of 6 days. Three patients are now alive with a good performance status (PS) and are disease free. The other 2 patients died of primary disease. The overall survival after surgical treatment varied from 20 to 90 months, with a median of 29 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment should be considered for patients with pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma who previously received CRT and achieved a CR, because it provides not only a longer survival, but also a good postoperative PS for some patients.

The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer: expert discussion and recommendations from the 12th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2010

Well-recognized experts in the field of gastric cancer discussed during the 12th European Society Medical Oncology (ESMO)/World Congress Gastrointestinal Cancer (WCGIC) in Barcelona many important and controversial topics on the diagnosis and management of patients with gastric cancer. This article summarizes the recommendations and expert opinion on gastric cancer. It discusses and reflects on the regional differences in the incidence and care of gastric cancer, the definition of gastro-esophageal junction and its implication for treatment strategies and presents the latest recommendations in the staging and treatment of primary and metastatic gastric cancer. Recognition is given to the need for larger and well-designed clinical trials to answer many open questions.

Phase II randomised trial of chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX4 or cisplatin plus fluorouracil in oesophageal cancer

Background:

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a valuable treatment option for localised oesophageal cancer (EC), but improvement is still needed. A randomised phase II trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and efficacy in terms of the endoscopic complete response rate (ECRR) of radiotherapy with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFOX4) or cisplatin/fluorouracil.

Methods:

Patients with unresectable EC (any T, any N, M0 or M1a), or medically unfit for surgery, were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles (three concomitant and three post-radiotherapy) of FOLFOX4 (arm A) or four cycles (two concomitant and two post-radiotherapy) of cisplatin/fluorouracil (arm B) along with radiotherapy 50 Gy in both arms. Responses were reviewed by independent experts.

Results:

A total of 97 patients were randomised (arm A/B, 53/44) and 95 were assessable. The majority had squamous cell carcinoma (82% arm A/B, 42/38). Chemoradiotherapy was completed in 74 and 66%. The ECRR was 45 and 29% in arms A and B, respectively. Median times to progression were 15.2 and 9.2 months and the median overall survival was 22.7 and 15.1 months in arms A and B, respectively.

Conclusion:

Chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX4, a well-tolerated and convenient combination with promising efficacy, is now being tested in a phase III trial.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil combination chemotherapy against metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

More effective regimens are urgently needed for squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus (SCCE), therefore, we conducted a phase I/II trial of a combination of docetaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil (TPF) for treating metastatic SCCE.

METHODS

This phase I/II trial (n = 12/39) was conducted in our institute from April 2005 to June 2008. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The recommended dose of docetaxel was determined to be 50 mg/m in phase I. In phase II with a mean follow-up period of 13.3 months, the objective response rate was 66.6%, a median survival period of 13 months and PFS of 7 months was achieved, and the 1-year survival and PFS rates were 52.9% and 19.6%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities of leukopenia, neutropenia, and anorexia were observed in 53.8%, 43.6%, and 25.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A TPF regimen against metastatic SCCE was well tolerated and achieved a favorable objective response rate and survival benefit compared with other recently reported regimens. Randomized phase III trials of the TPF regimen are warranted and urgently required.

Combined treatment of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and side effects of the combined therapy of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) and the survival of the patients.

METHODS: Sixty-four patients (median age of 63 years) with histological or cytological confirmation of ESCC received oxaliplatin 120 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 in a 21-d treatment cycle as palliative chemotherapy. Each patient received at least two cycles of treatment. The efficacy, side effects and patient survival were evaluated.

RESULTS: The partial response (PR) rate was 43.8% (28/64). Stable disease (SD) rate was 47.9% (26/64), and disease progression rate was 15.6% (10/64). The clinical benefit rate (PR + SD) was 84.4%. The main toxicities were leukopenia (50.0%), nausea and vomiting (51.6%), diarrhea (50.0%), stomatitis (39.1%), polyneuropathy (37.5%) and hand-foot syndrome (37.5%). No grade 4 event in the entire cohort was found. The median progression-free survival was 4 mo, median overall survival was 10 mo (95% CI: 8.3-11.7 mo), and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 38.1% and 8.2%, respectively. High Karnofsky index, single metastatic lesion and response to the regimen indicated respectively good prognosis.

CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin plus capecitabine regimen is effective and tolerable in metastatic ESCC patients. The regimen has improved the survival moderately and merits further studies.

Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of a chemoradiotherapy regimen using daily low-dose cisplatin and continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in 71 registered patients with unresectable esophageal cancer. The overall response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 59%. The major toxicities observed were leukopenia and anorexia. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 54.6% and 18.4%, respectively. A low preoperative C-reactive protein level was found to be associated with a good response. The pretreatment performance status and response results were both shown to be prognostic factors for overall survival. These findings confirmed that the chemoradiotherapy regimen had curative potential for unresectable esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer: current and emerging therapy modalities

During the last few years, there has been a gradual increase in treatment options for patients with esophageal malignancies. Several clinical studies have been performed, covering not only radiation and chemotherapy, but also the introduction of novel biological agents into the treatment arsenal. Patients with esophageal carcinoma are now offered second-line and sometimes even third-line treatments, and the number of research protocols is increasing. Despite the newly awakened interest in this malignancy, the overall 5-year survival rate has remained at approximately 10% since the 1980s. This review contains a compilation of available studies of esophageal malignancies and discusses current treatment options as well as newly developed therapies targeted at growth factor receptors.

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, folinic acid and concurrent radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses (RDs) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Patients received three courses of LV5FU2 regimen (folinic acid 200 mg m⁻², bolus 5FU 300–400 mg/m², continuous infusion 5FU 400–600 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 2) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin 50 to 100 mg m⁻² on day 1 (FOLFOX). This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, concomitant to a 50-gray radiotherapy per 5 weeks. Three more cycles were delivered after completion of radiation therapy. Three to six patients were allocated to each of the five dose levels until MTD was reached. Thirty-three patients were enroled and 21 had metastatic disease. Maximum tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 100 mg m⁻², and continuous infusion 5FU was 600 mg m⁻² day⁻ (level 5). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, dysphagia and oesophagitis. The RDs were those of FOLFOX-4 regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² and full doses of LV5FU2). The overall response was 48.5%, including 12% complete response. Response rate on primary tumour was 62.9%. This FOLFOX-4 regimen was reasonably well tolerated and effective in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal carcinoma and warrants additional investigation.

Adjuvant chemotherapy of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for complete resectable esophageal cancer: a case-matched cohort study in east China

It is still controversial whether adjuvant chemotherapy of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin can increase the overall survival of esophageal cancer patients, and which subgroup of patients get most benefits from it. Between 1998 and 2004, 66 esophageal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and 160 well-matched patients without chemotherapy were included in this study. Nine markers were measured in the protein level to analyze prognostic significance. In the whole group, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the survival of esophageal cancer patients. There was also no significant difference for survival in stage I (P=0.59 and P=0.59), stage II (P=0.28 and P=0.28) and stage III patients (P=0.144 and P=0.06) between the observation and the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy was most effective for the patients who had metastases in cervical and/or celiac lymph nodes (IV subgroup). One and 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly better than for those who did not receive the chemotherapy(P=0.038, and 0.016, respectively). Bcl-2 expression was a bad prognostic factor, and was more predictive in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the no-chemotherapy group. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the treatment result of stage IV patients compared with the observation group. Bcl-2 could be used to analyze prognosis and guide the adjuvant treatment.

Phase II trial of docetaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer and/or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC). This trial explored the efficacy and tolerability of combined docetaxel (Taxotere) + oxaliplatin (DOCOX) in GC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with untreated stage IV GC or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AGEJ) received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end points were response rate (RR), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics (N = 71): median age 59 years, 72% male, 51% esophagogastric junction cancer, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero, one, two were 42%, 51%, 7%, respectively. The median number of cycles was 6 (range, 1-19). Grades 3-4 toxic effects: neutropenia (70%); vomiting (17%); nausea (16%); dehydration, fatigue, or diarrhea (13%, each); and thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia (7%, each). Sixty-six patients completed >/=2 cycles. The RR was 36% with 25 partial response (PR) and no complete responses (CRs); stable disease (SD) was 49%. Clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + SD >/=6 months) was 40%; median PFS was 4.3 months, and OS was 8.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

DOCOX produced manageable toxicity in patients with advanced GC and AGEJ. The confirmed RR of 36%, CBR of 40%, and median survival of 8.5 months are encouraging and comparable to standard front-line regimens.

Novel targeted therapies for advanced esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is highly aggressive and is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Recent advances in multimodality chemoradiotherapy and surgery has improved survival in patients with loco-regional disease, but most patients with advanced stage esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis. Elucidation of the processes involved in esophageal carcinogenesis has identified a number of promising novel targets for therapy. This review focuses on the current status of targeted therapies with potential application to the treatment of advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The future challenge is to confirm the efficacy of these targeted agents in appropriately selected esophageal cancer patients, and successfully integrate these agents into effective therapies for all stages and subtypes of disease.

Multifractionated paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study assessed the clinical activity and safety of twice-weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (TP-HDFL) in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The regimen, composed of paclitaxel 35 mg/m 1-h intravenous infusion on days 1, 4, 8 and 11; cisplatin 20 mg/m 2-h intravenous infusion on days 2, 5, 9 and 12; and 5-flourouracil 2000 mg/m and leucovorin 300 mg/m 24-h intravenous infusion on days 5 and 12; repeated every 21 days. Forty-one patients (median age 51), 15 with de-novo metastatic disease and 26 with recurrent disease, were enrolled. Grades 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia and diarrhea occurred in 37.8, 29.4 and 14.2% of cycles, respectively. One patient died of invasive fungal infection. Three complete responses, 13 partial response and 13 stable diseases were observed. The intent-to-treat response rate was 39.0% (95% confidence interval: 24-54). The median progression-free and overall survival were 6.3 and 8.9 months (range 1-50+), respectively. Twice-weekly TP-HDFL has the activity and toxicity profile similar to the previously reported same three-drug combination for advanced esophageal cancer.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

A phase II study of capecitabine plus 3-weekly oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin every 3 weeks (XELOX regimen) has proven efficacy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. We investigated this combination in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric carcinoma. The study population comprised patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) over 2 h on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks. Patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty evaluable patients (17 men, 3 women) with a median age of 64 years (range 38-75) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI), 44-86%), with complete responses in two patients and partial responses in 11 patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.2-11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached during the study period. There was no grade 4 and little grade 3 toxicity. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (65% of patients) and the most common nonhaematological toxicities were vomiting (65%), neuropathy (60%), diarrhoea (30%), and hand-foot syndrome (20%). In conclusion, XELOX is apparently as effective as triplet combinations and is well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. We are starting a large multi-institutional phase II study of XELOX in this setting.