Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis

Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the optimal treatment for neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is not clear, and there is no evidence that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT). Due to the publication of new clinical trials and defects in previous meta-analyses, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nCRT and nCT.

METHODS

The following databases were searched for studies: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (updated to April 22, 2023). All randomized trials comparing nCRT with nCT in locally advanced esophageal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes assessed from the trials included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, and grade 3 or higher adverse events (3 + AEs).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 7 randomized controlled studies involving 1372 patients (686 receiving nCRT and 686 receiving nCT). Compared with nCT, nCRT significantly improved OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94), PFS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), pCR (OR = 13.00; 95% CI: 7.82-21.61) and R0 resection (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.32-2.57), but was associated with higher postoperative mortality (OR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.26-4.25) and grade 3 + AEs (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.36-3.58). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between nCRT and nCT (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82-1.61). Subgroup analysis showed significant survival benefit in squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98), but not in adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.63-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with nCRT compared with nCT in both tumor regression and prolonged survival, but increased the risk of postoperative mortality and grade 3 + AEs. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was more likely to benefit from nCRT than esophageal adenocarcinoma in the term of OS.

Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in 2020 and projections to 2030 and 2040

Esophageal cancer is a familiar malignancy with high incidence and mortality, and the overall prognosis is poor. The numbers of cases of and deaths from esophageal cancer have risen rapidly in recent decades. It is one of the most malignant cancers, with more than 0.6 million new cases and 0.54 million deaths worldwide in 2020. Here, we present the global epidemiology of esophageal cancer in 2020 and projections to 2030 and 2040 at different geographical levels of continents, regions and countries, and analyze them by gender, race, geographic region and human development index. We summarize the prospects for the esophageal cancer burden and risk factors in different areas, which will be useful for global esophageal cancer clinical therapy and cancer control planning.

AGR2 expression as a predictive biomarker for therapy response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Despite multidisciplinary therapy, the prognosis is poor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In the locally advanced stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery could provide survival benefits to some patients. Here, we aimed to identify for tumor therapy response a biomarker based on RNA sequencing. We collected endoscopic biopsies of 32 ESCC patients, who were divided according to nCRT response, into two groups: the complete response group (n  =  13) and the non-complete response group (n  =  19). RNA-sequencing data showed that 464 genes were differentially expressed. Increased in non-complete response group, 4 genes increased expressions were AGR2 (anterior gradient 2), GADD45B (growth arrest and DNA damage inducible beta), PPP1R15A (protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15A) and LRG1 (leucine rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the AGR2 gene was 0.671 according to read counts of RNA-seq and therapy response of nCRT. In vitro study showed that apoptosis cell was significantly increased in the AGR2-knockdown TE-2 cell line treated with cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), when compared with si-control. Results suggest that in ESCC, the AGR2 gene is a promising and predictive gene marker for the response to anti-tumor therapy.

Trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the role of volume-based PET/CT in patient management and prognostication

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and identify relevant prognostic factors from clinico-imaging-pathologic features of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (eSCC) patients undergoing trimodality therapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 275 patients with eSCCs of T3-T4aN0M0 and T1-T4aN1-N3M0 who received trimodality therapy. We correlated volume-based PET/CT parameters before and after concurrent chemoradiation therapy with pCR after surgery, clinico-imaging-pathologic features, and patient survival.

RESULTS

pCR occurred in 75 (27.3%) of 275 patients, of whom 61 (80.9%) showed 5-year survival. Pre-total lesion glycolysis (pre-TLG, OR = 0.318, 95% CI 0.169 to 0.600), post-metabolic tumor volume (post-MTV, OR = 0.572, 95% CI 0.327 to 0.999), and % decrease of average standardized uptake value (% SUVavg decrease, OR = 2.976, 95% CI = 1.608 to 5.507) were significant predictors for pCR. Among them, best predictor for pCR was pre-TLG with best cutoff value of 205.67 and with AUC value of 0.591. Performance status (HR = 5.171, 95% CI 1.737 to 15.397), pathologic tumor size (HR = 1.645, 95% CI 1.351 to 2.002), pathologic N status (N1, HR = 1.572, 95% CI 1.010 to 2.446; N2, HR = 3.088, 95% CI 1.845 to 5.166), and post-metabolic tumor volume (HR = 1.506, 95% CI 1.033 to 2.195) were significant predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Pre-TLG, post-MTV, and % SUVavg decrease are predictive of pCR. Additionally, several clinico-imaging-pathologic factors are significant survival predictors in locally advanced eSCC patients undergoing trimodality therapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemo-Radiotherapy as Intensive Neoadjuvant Protocol in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) represents a standard approach for both Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and Adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus, leading to a 10–15% improvement in survival rate as compared with surgery alone in clinical trials. In this observational study, we report the efficacy and safety of an intensive nCRT protocol in the daily clinical practice, including 122 patients treated with induction chemotherapy, followed by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, and surgery. Our findings showed good long-term survival and high pathological complete response (pCR) rates, with acceptable side-effects. Notably, the oncological outcome was the same in ADC and SCC responder patients. Although the nCRT protocol here reported represents a distinctive single-center experience, our results contribute to better define the role of an intensive neoadjuvant approach as a reliable therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, and enrich the current literature on this challenging context.

Abstract

Background: A phase II intensive neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) protocol for esophageal cancer (EC) was previously tested at our Center with promising results. We here present an observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol also in “real life” patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 122 ECs (45.1% squamous cell (SCC) and 54.9% adenocarcinoma (ADC)) treated with induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF), followed by concomitant TCF and radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy/25–28 fractions), between 2008 and 2017. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). Results: With a median follow-up of 62.1 months (95% CI 50–67.6 months), 5-year OS and EFS rates were 54.8% (95% CI 44.7–63.9) and 42.7% (95% CI 33.1–51.9), respectively. A pCR was observed in 71.1% of SCC and 37.1% of ADC patients (p = 0.001). At multivariate analysis, ypN+ was a significant prognostic factor for OS (Hazard Ratios (HR) 4.39 [95% CI 2.36–8.18]; p < 0.0001), while pCR was a strong predictor of EFS (HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.22–0.67]; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The nCRT protocol achieved considerable long-term survival and pCR rates also in “real life” patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate this protocol in a watch-and-wait approach.

Nomogram to predict overall survival for patients with non-metastatic cervical esophageal cancer: a SEER-based population study

Background

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is an uncommon malignancy with poor prognosis, and there is no specific model that can be used to accurately predict the survival of patients with CEC.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with non-metastatic CEC from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive factors were analyzed by Cox's proportional hazards regression, and a nomogram was created to predict survival probability using R software.

Results

We identified 601 patients with CEC, 94.3% of whom had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The median follow-up time was 71 months. The median OS and DSS for the overall population were 15 and 18 months, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in surgical rates over time, from 16.7% in 2004 to 8% in 2015 (P=0.035). Comprehensive strategies consisting of two or three treatment modalities were correlated with significantly better OS and DSS (P<0.001 for both). We randomly assigned half of the patients to the training cohort (n=300) and the other half to the validation cohort (n=301). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the training cohort. Age, sex, tumor size, stages in the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for OS. These factors were incorporated into the development of a nomogram for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.743, which was statistically higher than that of the AJCC staging system. The internal validation, using bootstrap resampling and external validation, demonstrated the accuracy of the nomogram.

Conclusions

We developed and validated the first nomogram for CEC. This nomogram could be used to predict the OS of CEC patients with a relatively high accuracy.

18F-FDG PET/CT Metrics Are Correlated to the Pathological Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy

Background and Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) to provide functional information useful in predicting pathological response to an intensive neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) protocol for both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients.

Material and Methods

Esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients, treated in our Center between 2014 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. The nCRT protocol schedule consisted of an induction phase of weekly administered docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF) for 3 weeks, followed by a concomitant phase of weekly TCF for 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions). Three ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed: before (PET₁) and after (PET₂) induction chemotherapy (IC), and prior to surgery (PET₃). Correlation between PET parameters [maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV_max and SUV_mean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)], radiomic features and tumor regression grade (TGR) was investigated.

Results

Fifty-four patients (35 ADC, 19 SCC; 48 cT3/4; 52 cN+) were eligible for the analysis. Pathological response to nCRT was classified as major (TRG1-2, 41/54, 75.9%) or non-response (TRG3-4, 13/54, 24.1%). A major response was statistically correlated with SCC subtype (p = 0.02) and smaller tumor length (p = 0.03). MTV and TLG measured prior to IC (PET₁) were correlated to TRG1-2 response (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02, respectively). After IC (PET₂), SUV_mean and TLG correlated with major response (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No significance was detected when relative changes of metabolic parameters between PET₁ and PET₂ were evaluated. At textural quantitative analysis, three independent radiomic features extracted from PET₁ images ([JointEnergy and InverseDifferenceNormalized of GLCM and LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis of GLSZM) were statistically correlated with major response (p < 0.0002).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT traditional metrics and textural features seem to predict pathologic response (TRG) in EC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Further investigations are necessary in order to obtain a reliable predictive model to be used in the clinical practice.

Tumor Regression in Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Adenocarcinomas after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Tumor regression following neoadjuvant treatment can be observed in lymph node (LN) metastases similar to the primary tumor in esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). We evaluated the prognostic significance of tumor regression in LN metastases of locally advanced EAC of 239 patients treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTX) or chemotherapy (CTX) followed by esophagectomy. We examined retrospectively the LN for histopathologic signs of regression, i.e., nodular fibrosis and acellular mucin. LN classification was performed according to two parameters: presence (−) or absence (+) of residual tumor and regression characteristics in the LN, resulting in four categories: LN−/REG−, LN−/REG+, LN+/REG+, LN+/REG−. In total, LN metastases with residual tumor were detectable in 117/239 (49%) cases. Regression in LN were observed in 85/239 cases (35.5%). The distribution of the LN/REG categories were as follows: 97 patients (40.6%) were LN−/REG−. A total of 25 patients (10.5%) were LN−/REG+. A total of 60 (25.1%) were LN+/REG+ and 57 (23.8%) LN+/REG−. The LN/Reg categorization had a significant prognostic value in univariate analysis (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.326; p = 0.002) with similar results for the subgroups of patients treated with RCTX or CTX. The prognosis of LN−/REG+ was worse than LN−/REG− but better than both LN+ categories, which was demonstrated in the Kaplan–Meier curves but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.104 and p = 0.090, respectively). In contrast, there was no difference between LN+/REG+ and LN+/REG− (p = 0.802). In summary, regression in LN metastases of EAC can be observed in a significant number of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. Complete regression of former LN metastases in comparison to “true” negative LN seems to be of prognostic relevance but additional studies are needed to confirm this trend seen in our study.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation changes podoplanin expression in esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) result in a worse prognosis. Neoadjuvant treatment improves survival, however, only for responders. The transmembrane glycoprotein podoplanin is overexpressed in squamous cell carcinomas, miRNA-363 is associated to its regulation in head and neck cancer.

AIM

To predict therapy response and prognosis markers, and targets for novel therapies would individualize treatments leading to more favourable outcomes.

METHODS

Expression of podoplanin protein has been visualized by immunohistochemistry in surgical specimens of 195 esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy: 90 ESCC and 105 EAC with clinical T2-3, Nx, M0. One hundred and six patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. RNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue, and miRNA-363 quantified by real-time TaqMan-real-time-PCR. D2-40 mab staining of > 5% was scored as high podoplanin expression (HPE). We related podoplanin and miRNA-363 expression to histopathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment and clinicopathological characteristics, such as histological tumor type, survival rate or clinical tumor category.

RESULTS

We confirmed expression of membrane-bound podoplanin in 90 ESCC patients. 26% showed HPE of > 5%. In addition, absence in EAC patients (only 2% with HPE) was shown. Lower podoplanin expression has been detected in resection-specimen of 58 ESCC patients after neoadjuvant (RTx/CTx) treatment, only 11% with HPE, compared to 50% HPE of 32 non-pretreated primary surgery patients, P = 0.0001. This difference of podoplanin expression was confirmed comparing pre-treatment biopsies with matching post-treatment surgical specimens, P < 0.001. Podoplanin has been identified as a prognostic marker in 32 patients that underwent primary surgery without neoadjuvant treatment. Low (0-5%) podoplanin expression was associated with better prognosis compared to patients with HPE, P = 0.013. Podoplanin expression has been associated with post-transcriptional regulation by miRNA-363. At a cut-off value of miR-363 < 7, lower miR-363 expression correlated with HPE in surgical tissue specimens of primary surgery patients, P = 0.013. Therefore, ESCC patients with miRNA-363 expression < 7 had a worse prognosis than patients expressing miRNA-363 ≥ 7, P = 0.049.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the molecular process that leads to decrease in podoplanin expression during neoadjuvant treatment and its regulation may provide novel markers and targets to improve targeted therapy of ESCC.

Should adenosquamous esophageal cancer be treated like adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have distinct outcomes, treatment strategies, and response profiles to therapy. Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is thought to behave more aggressively than each of its counterparts. The aim of this study is to determine ifASC is best managed as AC or SCC.

METHODS

National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was queried for patients with nonmetastatic esophageal ASC. The analysis was stratified by clinical node-negative (cN0) or clinical node-positive (cN1-3). Treatment was categorized into chemoradiation alone, surgery alone, or preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 352 patients, 43% were cN0 (n = 151), 57% were cN1-3 (n = 201) and 55% had chemoradiation alone (n = 194), 15% surgery alone (n = 53), and 30% preoperative chemoradiation (n = 105). Among patients who had preoperative chemoradiation, 20% had pathologic complete response (n = 17). For either cN0 or cN1-3, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index did not differ among the treatment groups(all p > 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis for cN0, treatment with surgery alone had comparable OS to preoperative chemoradiation (47% vs 34%; P = .5) and each had improved OS compared to chemoradiation alone (30%; P = .02; P = .06). On univariate analysis for cN0, clinical T category was not associated with OS. For cN1-3, however, preoperative chemoradiation was associated with improved OS when compared to chemoradiation alone or surgery alone (27% vs 19% vs 0%; P < .001). This persisted when accounting for age and clinical T category (hazard ratio: 0.45; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal ASC behaves more like AC in response to chemoradiation and survival based on treatment modality. A complete response to chemoradiation is only 20% unlike what has been shown for SCC, where chemoradiation is an acceptable definitive therapy. Esophageal ASC should be managed more like AC.

Sequential boost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase II study

Purpose

This prospective phase II study aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sequential boost of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Patients with histologically or cytologically proven inoperable ESCC were enrolled in this study (ChiCTR‐OIC‐17010485). A larger target volume for subclinical lesion was irradiated with 50 Gy, and then, a smaller target volume only including gross tumor was boosted to 66 Gy. The fraction dose was 2 Gy, and no elective node was irradiated. Concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy of fluorouracil (600 mg/m², days 1‐3) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m², days 1‐3) was administered every 4 weeks, for 4 cycles in total. The primary endpoint was 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS).

Results

Eighty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 years (range: 45‐75 years), and 69 patients (78.4%) were men. With the median follow‐up of 26 (range: 3‐95) months, the 2‐ and 5‐year PFS were 39.3% and 36.9%, respectively, and overall survival (OS) were 57.1% and 39.2%, respectively. Tumor stage and concurrent chemotherapy were independent OS predictors. Major acute adverse events were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1‐2. Nine percent and 2.3% of patients had grade 3 acute esophagitis and late esophageal strictures, respectively.

Conclusions

Sequential boost to 66 Gy by IMRT with chemotherapy was safe and effective for inoperable ESCC. A randomized phase III study to compare with standard dose of 50 Gy is warranted.

Pathological Tumor Regression Grade Classifications in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Role on Patients' Prognosis

Preoperative chemotherapy or combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery, represents the standard approach for locally advanced esophageal, gastric, and rectal carcinomas. To adequately evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant CRT in the resection specimens, several histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring systems have been introduced into clinical practice. The primary goal of these TRG systems relies on a correct prognostic stratification of patients in the attempt to help clinical decision-making and influence surgical strategies, postoperative adjuvant therapies, and surveillance intensity. However, most TRG systems suffer from poor reproducibility and low interobserver concordance rates. Many efforts have been made in the identification of alternative, robust, simple, and universally accepted TRG scoring systems, which would help in the comparison of different treatment strategies and in the standardization of multimodal therapies. The aim of this review is to analyze the most commonly used TRG systems in gastrointestinal cancers highlighting their pitfalls and usefulness, depending on the tumor type.

Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy-Based or Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: To date, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT with standard fractionation three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) have not been compared. In this study, the outcomes of IMRT-based concurrent CCRT and those of 3D-CRT-based CCRT were compared in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). Methods: We enrolled 2062 patients with TESCC who had received CCRT and categorized them into two groups on the basis of their treatment modality: Group 1 (3D-CRT-based CCRT) and Group 2 (IMRT-based CCRT). Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the American Joint Committee on Cancer advanced stages (≥IIIA) and 3D-CRT were significant independent predictors of poor outcomes in patients with TESCC who received definitive CCRT. Moreover, receiving IMRT-based CCRT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–0.98) was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.0223). In Group 2, aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at early (IA–IIB) and advanced clinical stages were 0.91 (0.67–1.25, p = 0.5746) and 0.88 (0.77–0.99, p = 0.0368), respectively. Conclusion: IMRT-based CCRT resulted in higher survival rates in patients with advanced clinical stages of TESCC (i.e., IIIA–IIIC), namely, clinical T3, clinical T4, or lymph node involvement.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer - which response grading system best impacts prognostic discrimination?

AIMS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces tumour volume and improves the R0 resection rate, followed by extended survival for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. The degree of tumour regression has high prognostic relevance. To date, there is still no generally accepted tumour regression grading system. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic discrimination power of different histological regression grading systems: (i) the fibrosis/tumour ratio within the primary tumour (Mandard classification), (ii) the percentage of residual vital tumour cells (VTC) compared to the original primary tumour (Cologne Regression) and (iii) the ypT category, in patients with cT3 carcinoma of the oesophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 216 patients with oesophageal cancer clinically staged as cT3NxM0 and treated from 2009 to 2012 with standardised chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy [median age 62 years, 176 (81%) male and 138 (64%) adenocarcinoma patients]. The subgroup frequencies of the three classification systems were ypT category: ypT0 = 18%, ypT1 = 14%, ypT2 = 23%, ypT3 = 44%, ypT4 = 1%; Mandard classification: TRG1 = 18%, TRG2 = 26%, TRG3 = 24%, TRG4 = 30%, TRG5 = 2%; and Cologne Regression Scale: no tumour = 18%, 1-10% VTC = 27%, 10-50% VTC = 26% and >50% VTC = 29%. The Mandard and Cologne Regression classifications showed better prognostic differentiation for the subgroups than the ypT category. The four-tiered Cologne Regression system had a good prognostic relevance. Comparing results of the re-evaluated Cologne Regression classification with the classification by routine pathological report showed very good inter-rater agreement, with kappa value 0.891.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the original primary tumour, the tumour regression grading system using the percentage of residual vital tumour has prognostic relevance.

Clinical Results of Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan

There are few reports about the clinical results of proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in a large population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in a large population using a multicentered database. Between January 2009 and December 2013, patients newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer and who had received proton beam therapy were retrospectively recruited from a database of four proton beam therapy centers in Japan. Two hundred and two patients (including 90 inoperable patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 100 patients (49.5%) had stage III/IV cancer (Union for International Cancer Control 8th). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rate was 66.7% and 56.3%, respectively. The five-year local control rate was 64.4%. There were two patients with grade three pericardial effusion (1%) and a patient with grade three pneumonia (0.5%). No grade 4 or higher cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0). This study suggests that proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer was not inferior in efficacy and had lower rates of toxicities in comparison to photon radiotherapy. Therefore, proton beam therapy can serve as an alternate treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

Tumor Remission and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes During Chemoradiation Therapy: Predictive and Prognostic Markers in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Clinical tools are unavailable for accurate prediction of pathologic responses to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before surgery. We evaluated tumor remission and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) during CRT as predictors of pathologic response and prognostic markers for patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with neoadjuvant CRT (neo-CRT) or definitive CRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed patients with locally advanced ESCC (N = 164) who underwent neo-CRT (N = 48) or definitive CRT (N = 116). Patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsies when induction CRT finished. Tumor remission characteristics were designated minor (-/+) to excellent remission (ER) (+++). TILs were determined in 10% increments. Tumor remission, TILs, or both were associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival in the neo-CRT group and then analyzed in the definitive CRT group.

RESULTS

ER and lymphocyte-predominant ESCC (LPE; ≥60% TILs) were identified according to the pCR rate and disease-free survival. We built a prediction model for pCR incorporating ER and LPE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.877, and sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 90.9%, respectively. Furthermore, this model identified pathologic response with an excellent calibration. Disease-free survival of patients with ER and LPE tumors was significantly longer than that of other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When we included tumor remission and TILs during CRT, our model predicted pCR with high probability and helped stratify prognostic subgroups, thereby guiding future therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Validation of this model in larger, prospective, multicenter studies is essential.

Evaluating the optimal radiation dose for definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single institution experience

The optimal radiation dose for definitive chemoradiotherapy in inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been long debated. In this study, we evaluated the effect of doses greater than the conventional radiation dose (50.4 Gy) on tumor control, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).The database of patients diagnosed with inoperable ESCC from 2007 to 2015 was obtained from the cancer registry of Chi-Mei Medical Center. All categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test. The risk of OS and DFS were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression, and Kaplan-Meier plots presented the trend of OS and DFS with log-rank tests used to compare differences. All significance levels were set at P < .05.A total of 84 patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 (50%) receiving >50.4 Gy and 42 (50%) receiving ≤50.4 Gy (50%) concurrently with chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between higher dose and conventional dose in OS (P = .21) and DFS (P = .26). Further dose analysis of <50, 50 to 50.4, 51 to 60, and >60 Gy showed no significant differences in OS or DFS. Higher doses conveyed no significant benefit on the failure pattern, either local regional failure or distant failure (P = .42). Major prognostic factors associated with better OS on multivariate analysis were stages I and II patients (P = .03) and radiation technique using arc therapy (P = .04). No acute toxicity of grade III or higher was recorded.The results of our study show that providing higher than conventional radiation doses concurrent with chemotherapy for inoperable ESCC does not impact OS or DSF, nor does it improve locoregional failure or distant failure. Although tumor response might be improved by radiation doses >50.4 Gy, the impact on OS and DFS remain to be studied.

The current optimal multimodality treatments for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodality treatments including definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery (S) are frequently used to improve prognosis in locally advanced oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (LAESCC), while the optimal multimodality regimen has yet to be defined; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find out the current best multimodality regimen for LAESCC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S or dCRT. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were the rates of R0 resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor-free lymph nodes (pN0) and postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Five studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S and fourteen studies comparing nCRT + S with dCRT were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that nCRT + S had higher rates of R0 resection (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.03-3.29), pCR (OR: 2.90 95% CI 1.37-6.14) and pN0 (OR: 2.55 95% CI 1.54-4.24) with a significant survival advantage (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99) when compared with nCT + S in LAESCC. When nCRT + S was compared with dCRT, nCRT + S yielded a significant survival benefit (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76) and had a significantly lower rate of local recurrence (OR: 0.35 95% CI 0.22-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that CRT + S may be the optimal potential curative treatment mode for patients with LAESCC as long as they are suitable for this multimodality regimen.

Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The short-term benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) Ivor Lewis were proved, but 6-year outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remain unclear. We sought to investigate perioperative outcomes, quality of life (QOL), survival and impact of adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients who underwent MIE Ivor Lewis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 530 ESCC patients treated with MIE Ivor Lewis from 2011 to 2016. Relevant variables were collected and assessed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier or Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Median operation duration was 266 min. The median number of lymph nodes was 28. The 30-day postoperative mortality was 1.7%. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the 6-year OS and DFS were 44.7% and 46.1%. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy offered survival advantages in advanced stage patients. Pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage, postoperative complications, and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors based on multivariate analysis. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed a rapid postoperative QOL improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE Ivor Lewis is a safe and feasible procedure in ESCC patients. It offers satisfactory perioperative outcomes, rapid QOL improvement, and acceptable long-term oncologic survival. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may improve OS and DFS in advanced stage patients.

Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Non-Surgical Treatment of the Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely accepted and is considered a standard treatment, particularly for unresectable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal use of the combined modalities of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. In addition, no consensus has been reached regarding the exact efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) and the most appropriate radiotherapy dose.

Material/Methods

Clinical data from 262 ESCC patients treated with CRT (n=165) or RT alone (n=97) were collected and reviewed. The long-term outcomes were analyzed, and treatment related acute toxicity reactions were compared.

Result

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 75.3%, 35.6%, and 25.3%, respectively, for the CRT group and 61.5%, 26.7%, and 17.6% for the RT-alone group (P=0.015). The concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) groups exhibited similar survival outcomes (for OS, P=0.568; for progression-free survival (PFS,) P=0.145). CCT after CCRT did not influence OS (P=0.236) but was associated with a more favorable PFS (P=0.020). In addition, high-dose of 60–65 Gy tended to prolong OS compared with low-dose (<60 Gy) or excessive-dose (>65 Gy). The incidence of adverse reactions, such as esophagitis and leukopenia, in the CRT group were significantly higher than in the RT-alone group (P=0.019, P=0.001, respectively), and no significant difference was observed between patients treated with CCRT and CCT after CCRT.

Conclusions

Treating non-surgical ESCC patients with CCRT conferred a significant survival benefit compared with RT alone. CCT after CCRT prolongs PFS but does not increase acute toxicity. High-dose (60–65 Gy) CCRT could generate more favorable survival outcomes.

Induction therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma: Is radiation Always necessary?

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between induction chemotherapy alone (ICA) and induction chemoradiation (ICR) in patients with locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients in the National Cancer Database treated with ICA or ICR followed by esophagectomy between 2006 and 2012 for cT1-3N1M0 or T3N0M0 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus were compared using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards methods.

RESULTS

The study group included 4763 patients, of whom 4323 patients (90.8%) received ICR and 440 patients (9.2%) received ICA. There were no differences in age, sex, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index, treatment facility type, clinical T or N status between the 2 groups. Tumor size ≥5 cm (odds ratio, 1.46; P = .006) was the only factor that predicted ICR use. Higher rates of T downstaging (39.7% vs 33.4%; P = .012), N downstaging (32.0% vs 23.4%; P < .001), and complete pathologic response (13.1% vs 5.9%; P < .001) occurred in ICR patients. Positive margins were seen more often in ICA patients (9.6% vs 5.5%; P = .001), but there was no difference in 5-year survival (ICR 35.9% vs ICA 37.2%; P = .33), and ICR was not associated with survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 1.04; P = .61).

CONCLUSIONS

ICR for locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with a better local treatment effect, but not improved survival compared with ICA, which suggests that radiation can be used selectively in this clinical situation.

Clinical relevance of histologic subtypes in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with pre-operative chemoradiotherapy: Experience of a monographic oncologic centre

Background

Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (LAEC) represents less than 30% of all diagnosed esophageal carcinoma worldwide. The standard of care for resectable tumours consists of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Despite the curative intent, the prognosis is still poor mainly due to relapse. A multidisciplinary approach is required in order to optimize the therapeutic strategy and follow-up. Differences in outcomes between the two main histological subtypes, adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), have been reported. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity in trials design and data available have hampered the achievement of clear conclusions. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes from a cohort of patients with LAEC treated with a multidisciplinary approach and to remark the differences observed between the two main histologic subtypes and their clinical implications.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients diagnosed with LAEC that were treated with preoperative CRT at our institution and integrated centres. Histopathological characteristics and toxicities during treatment were recorded. Patterns of recurrence at the first relapse were analysed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used.

Results

Among the patients who received preoperative CRT, 83% underwent surgery. The median overall survival (mOS) was 31.7 months, 26.9 months for ADC and 45.5 for SCC (p-value = 0.33). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, ypN+ was the only factor that negatively influenced in OS (OR = 4.1, p-value = 0.022). Patterns of recurrence differed according to histologic subtype. Distant relapse was more frequent in ADC (62%), whereas locoregional relapse was higher in SCC (50%) (p-value = 0.027). Second line therapeutic strategies could be offered to 50% of those patients who relapsed.

Conclusions

Differences in outcomes and recurrence pattern could be observed between the two main histologic subtypes of LAEC. A better molecular characterization, adapted therapeutic regimens and follow up strategies should be adopted in order to improve survival of these patients.

Dose escalation intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective for advanced-stage thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

No studies have investigated the effects of irradiation-dose escalation intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from patients with TESCC who were enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. To compare treatment outcomes, the patients were categorized into two groups according to their radiotherapy doses: group 1, who received CCRT<60Gy with IMRT, and group 2, who received CCRT≥60Gy with IMRT. Group 1 was used as the control for investigating posttreatment mortality risk.

RESULTS

We enrolled 2061 patients with TESCC without distant metastasis who received CCRT with IMRT. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that advanced clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (≥IIIA), alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking were significant, poor independent predictors in patients with TESCC receiving IMRT-based CCRT. IMRT-based CCRT (≥60Gy; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.83) was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P<0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, the aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at all clinical stages were 0.75 (0.68-0.83, P<0.0001) in group 2. In group 2, the aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at early (IA-IIB) and advanced (IIIA-IIIC) AJCC clinical stages were 0.89 (0.70-1.04, P=0.1905) and 0.75 (0.67-0.83, P<0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard-dose IMRT-based CCRT, high-dose IMRT-based CCRT yields more favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage TESCC.

Value and application of trimodality therapy or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the value and optimal application of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

METHODS

The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. To compare their outcomes, patients with TESCC were enrolled and categorized into the following groups according to treatment modality: group 1, those who underwent surgery alone; group 2, those who received trimodality therapy; and group 3, those who received definitive CCRT. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 3522 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥3, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage ≥IIA, earlier year of diagnosis, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and definitive CCRT were significant, independent predictors of a poor prognosis. After adjustment for confounders, adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall mortality in patients with clinical stage I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC TESCC were 2.01 (95% CI, 0.44-6.18), 1.65 (95% CI, 0.99-2.70), 1.48 (95% CI, 0.91-2.42), 0.66 (95% CI, 1.08-1.14), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.26-0.57), and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.83), respectively, in group 2; and 2.06 (95% CI, 1.18-3.59), 2.65 (95% CI, 1.76-4.00), 2.25 (95% CI, 1.49-3.39), 1.34 (95% CI, 0.79-2.28), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.17), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.51-1.71), respectively, in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimodality therapy may be beneficial for the survival of patients with advanced-stage (IIIA-IIIC) TESCC, and CCRT might be an alternative to surgery alone in these patients. Cancer 2017;123:3904-15. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Predictive genetic markers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a long way to go. Review of the literature

The role of genetic molecular markers in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer has been reviewed, focusing strictly on concurrent chemoradiation protocols followed by surgery. Eleven studies evaluated the role of mRNA expression profile; the end point was overall survival (OS) in two studies and different definitions of histological response in nine. Genes reported as significant were involved in cell cycle control (30), apoptosis (7), structural molecules (9), cell metabolism (6) and DNA repair (1). Seven studies reported about 15 microRNA (miRNA) molecules associated with OS (2) or histological response (13), however, defined with different classifications. Their target genes were prevalently involved in cell cycle control (4), apoptosis (1), cell adhesion (1), migration (1) and angiogenesis (1). Gene polymorphisms (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been evaluated in 8 studies reporting 10 variants associated with survival or pathological response. OS was the end point in six of these studies. SNPs reported as significant were involved in DNA repair system (4), detoxification (2), folate metabolism (6), drug efflux (2) and others (2). In a study, a panel including histology, pathological response and five SNPs discriminated two subsets of patients with 5-year survival rates of 79.3% and 26.3% (hazard ratio 6.25, P<0.0001). In another study, combination of stage, grade and 4 miRNAs improved prediction of pathological response (P=10^-30). At present, given the great inconsistency of the data and the variability of the end points, definite conclusions are extremely difficult, if not impossible. More consistent data can derive only from analyses obtained from patients included in prospective randomized trials while panels combining genetic and clinical factors may improve prediction.

Molecular Markers for the Prediction of Minor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the Prospective Cologne Esophageal Response Prediction (CERP) Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a single or combination of biomarker(s) for histopathologic non-response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients without response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer have no prognostic benefits, but experience time delays and risk side effects.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for this prospective diagnostic study were patients with cT3,Nx,M0, esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma and planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (5- fluorouracil, cisplatin, 40Gy) followed by 2-field transthoracic esophagectomy. From pretherapeutic endoscopic tumor biopsies, ERCC1 rs11615 single-nucleotide polymorphism (ERCC1-SNP) and a combination of gene expression marker mRNA (ERCC1, DPYD, ERBB2) were analyzed. ERCC1-SNP was subdifferentiated into homozygous C-allele (CC) and T-allele (TT), and heterozygous C/T carriers. The primary endpoint was the prediction of histopathological minor response (≥10% vital tumor cells in the primary tumor) relative to marker levels.

RESULTS

From 2009 until 2013, 320 patients were screened, and 85 patients (SCC n = 29, AC n = 56) were included in the study. Forty-one patients (48%) had major response with 3-year survival rate (3-YSR) of 57% compared with 44 patients with minor response and 3-YSR of 25% (P = 0.001). Patients with ERCC1-SNP CC (n = 8) and TT (n = 37) had similar rates of minor response of 70% and 75%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71% [95% confidence interval (CI 56%-84%)]. PPV increased to 89% (95% CI 73%-96%) when ERCC1-SNP was combined with mRNA markers.

CONCLUSION

ERCC1-SNP in combination with mRNA ERCC1, DPYD, and ERBB2 from pretherapeutic endoscopic biopsies can predict minor response to chemoradiation, as a basis for individualized therapy of advanced esophageal cancer.

Effectiveness of esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy through intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques

BACKGROUND

Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the effectiveness of esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) who receive definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) through modern, intensity modulated-RT (IMRT) techniques. The therapeutic effects of esophagectomy in patients with TESCC were evaluated using modern clinical staging and RT techniques and suitable RT doses.

METHODS

The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Patients were categorized into the following groups on the basis of treatment modality to compare their outcomes: group 1 received definitive CCRT, group 2 received neoadjuvant RT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥50 grays [Gy]), and group 3 receiving neoadjuvant CCRT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥ 50 Gy). The median total RT dose and fraction size were 50.4 Gy and 1.8 Gy per fraction, respectively. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 3123 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Patient ages 65 years and older, Charlson comorbidity index scores ≥3, advanced clinical stages (IIA-IIIC), alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking were identified as significant, independent poor prognostic risk factors for overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses. In group 3, after adjustment for confounders, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for overall mortality were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.93) for patients with clinical stage IIA disease, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.91) for those with clinical stage IIB disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55) for those with clinical stage IIIA disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.39-0.56) for those with clinical stage IIIB disease, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.57) for those with clinical stage IIIC disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy can be beneficial in patients with TESCC after definitive CCRT, especially in those who have advanced-stage disease. Cancer 2017;123:2043-2053. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

FDG PET using SUVmax for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Accurate T-staging is pivotal for predicting prognosis and selecting appropriate therapies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for its T-staging is uncertain. We investigated use of FDG PET/CT for preoperative T-staging of patients with ESCC.

METHODS

Patients with ESCC given preoperative FDG PET/CT scans, either with (CRT[+] group) or without (CRT[-] group) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumors on FDG PET/CT scans were measured, and histopathological results were used as the reference standard. The associations between pathological T-stage and potential factors of age, tumor location, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SUVmax were analyzed. The cut-off levels of SUVmax for predicting different T-stages and for residual viable tumors after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were determined using receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

We enrolled 103 patients (45 in the CRT[-] group; 58 in the CRT[+] group). SUVmax, an independent predictive factor, positively correlated with the pathological T-stage in both groups (CRT[-] group: ρ = 0.736, p < 0.001; and CRT[+] group: ρ = 0.792, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax for predicting the pathological T-stage was 73.3% in the CRT[-] group (SUVmax of T0: 0-1.9, T1: 2.0-4.4, T2: 4.5-6.5, T3: 6.6-13.0, T4: >13.0) and 67.2% in the CRT[+] group (SUVmax of T0: 0-3.4, T1: 3.5-3.9, T2: 4.0-5.5, T3: 5.6-6.2, T4: > 6.2). For CRT[-] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 4.4 to differentiate early (T0-1) from locally advanced disease (T2-4) was 82.2% (95% CI, 71.1-93.4%). For CRT[+] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 3.4 to predict residual viable tumors (non-T0) after completion of chemoradiotherapy was 82.8% (95% CI, 73.0-92.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The FDG avidity of a primary esophageal tumor significantly positively correlated with the pathological T-stage. PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax was useful for predicting T-stage and differentiating residual viable tumors.

Current status of proteomics of esophageal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Identifying suitable biomarkers for early diagnosis as well as predicting lymph node metastasis, prognosis and the therapeutic response of EC is essential for the effective and efficient management for EC. There is an urgent need to develop effective, novel approaches for patients who do not respond to conventional treatment. Areas covered: EC is characterized by the presence of two main histological types such as squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, which differ in their response to treatments and prognosis. Thus, this review describes the latest research into biomarkers and novel treatment targets generated by cancer proteomics for the two main histological types. Finally, the main difficulties facing the translation of biomarkers and novel treatment targets into the clinical settings are discussed. Expert commentary: EC proteomics have provided useful results and, after their validation, novel clinical tools should be developed to improve the clinical outcomes for EC patients.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET for pathological response of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We want to review the value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for response prediction of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library with specific search strategy. The published articles were included according to the criteria established in advance. The included studies were divided into two groups according to the time of the repeat positron emission tomography: during (Group A) or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group B). The studies that performed the repeat positron emission tomography after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were graded Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were obtained for both groups on the basis of no-existing of threshold effect.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the present study. The threshold effect did not exist in both groups. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were 85%, 59%, 6.82 with 95% confidence interval 76-91%, 48-69%, 2.25-20.72 in Group A. The equivalent values were 67%, 69%, 6.34 with 95% confidence interval 60-73%, 63-74%, 2.08-19.34 in Group B. The pooled sensitivity was 90% in four studies that enrolled patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma merely in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present data, positron emission tomography should not be used routinely to guide treatment strategy in esophageal cancer patients. We speculated that positron emission tomography could be used as a tool to predict treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Reports of improved survival in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is extrapolated from heterogeneous studies that include squamous cell histology. We sought to determine if pCR is associated with a survival advantage in a homogenous group of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This is a single institution analysis of all patients with T2-T4 or node positive esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological response, pCR vs. incomplete pathological response (iPR). Survival outcomes were evaluated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients were included in the study: 38 (19 %) patients with pCR and 167 patients (81 %) with iPR. The two groups were similar with respect to clinical stage, age, gender, comorbid conditions, ECOG status, smoking, and alcohol use. Patients in the pCR group had a higher percentage of tumors located in middle third of esophagus (11 vs. 2 %, p = 0.04) while tumor grade was similar in both groups. Median follow-up was 50 months, range 2-109 months. The 3-year overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for iPR was 48 and 39 %, respectively, vs. 86 and 80 % for pCR group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of a cohort of homogeneous patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing multimodality therapy showed that pCR is an independent predictor of improved RFS and OS. This data contributes to a growing body of evidence highlighting the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy specific to esophageal adenocarcinoma particularly when pCR is achieved.

Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Regression After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer

Prognostic factors after preoperative chemoradiation for patients with advanced esophageal cancer are under discussion. Treatment response measured in the primary tumor is a well-defined prognostic marker. The prognostic relevance of tumor regression in lymph nodes (LNs), eg, histomorphologic characteristics must be evaluated in a larger series of patients. From 1997-2010, 403 patients with cT3N×M0 esophageal cancer underwent preoperative chemoradiation followed by transthoracic esophagectomy. Histopathologic response of the primary tumor was graded in resected specimens as "minor" (≥10% vital residual tumor cells) or "major." The LNs of all patients without LN metastases (ypN0 n = 222, adenocarcinoma n = 129, squamous cell carcinoma n = 93) were reevaluated for central fibrosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on histomorphologic criteria of examined LNs and used to correlate these with tumor response and prognosis. The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) for all patients was 30%. Overall, 5480 LNs were reevaluated for the existence of central fibrosis in ypN0 cases. The prognostic relevance of the LN regression (LNR) grading system was confirmed for all patients with univariate (P < 0.001) and multivariate (P = 0.02) analyses. In results, the 5YSR for ypN0 patients overall was 37%, for patients with major response by the primary tumor was 42%, and for minor responders was 19% (P < 0.001). Analyzing LNR in major responders, the group with less than 3 LNs with central fibrosis (n = 52) showed significantly better prognosis (5YSR = 63%) compared to those with more (5YSR = 34%), (P = 0.016). Conclusion includes morphologic signs of metastatic LNR after chemoradiation, such as central fibrosis, are of prognostic relevance for patients with advanced esophageal cancer, especially for those with major response of the primary tumor.

A meta-analysis identifies ERCC1 gene polymorphism as a predictor of better patient response to treatment with radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether an association exists between the ERCC1 rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism and patient response to platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Publications were selected from PubMed and MEDLINE. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the association between genetic polymorphisms and response to platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation-based chemotherapy by checking the odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In our overall analysis, the ERCC1 rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism was not associated with response to platinum-based chemotherapy in five comparison models. In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, the ERCC1 rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism was shown to be significantly associated with objective response in Caucasian patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in the recessive model (TT vs.

CT/CC

OR 0.696, 95 % CI 0.508-0.954, heterogeneity = 0.330), but the association was not observed in the Asian population. The C allele was significantly associated with better response to radiochemotherapy in the recessive model comparison (TT vs.

CC/CT

OR 0.724, 95 % CI 0.585-0.869, heterogeneity = 0.008). Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that the C allele of ERCC1 rs11615 predicted a better response in esophageal cancers in two comparison models (T vs. C: OR 0.756, 95 % CI 0.648-0.880, heterogeneity = 0.653; TT vs.

TC/CC

OR 0.457, 95 % CI 0.306-0.684, heterogeneity = 0.723). Stratified analysis by ethnicity showed a better response in Caucasians in allelic comparison model (T vs. C: OR 0.895, 95 % CI 0.819-0.977, heterogeneity = 0.095).

CONCLUSION

Together, our results suggest that the ERCC1 rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism was associated with therapeutic response in Caucasian patients and C allele of ERCC1 rs11615 could represent a genetic molecular marker to predict better patient response to radiochemotherapy in recessive model. However, larger prospective randomized trials will be required.

A novel endoscopic marker for radiological localization and image-guided radiotherapy in esophageal and gastric cancers (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Radiotherapy is an accepted modality in the treatment of esophageal cancers and is currently being evaluated in conjunction with chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancers. Our aim was to assess whether a novel endoscopically inserted marker can be used to improve radiological assessment of the primary cancer and allow for image-guided radiotherapy.

METHODS

A phase II feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary-care center. Twenty-six consecutive adult patients with esophagogastric cancers underwent endoscopic marking of the tumor margins with a novel radiopaque marker (mixture of lipiodol and n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate). The main outcome measure was the successful insertion of the marker based on a combination of radiological, endoscopic, and histological assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 92 markers were inserted in 26 patients. Twenty-two (88%) had follow-up imaging to assess the 81 markers inserted, 79 of which (97.5%) were visible. There were no postprocedural adverse events noted in our cohort. Radiological assessment of tumor size improved such that it was in line with the endoscopic evaluation after marker placement in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%) who had appropriate follow-up radiology imaging. Ten patients (38.5%) from our cohort underwent image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) by using the endoscopically inserted markers.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of our small pilot study, endoscopic placement of our novel marker was successful in the majority of our cohort without significant adverse events. Marker placement resulted in improved radiological localization in the majority of our cohort and allowed for IGRT. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000239763.).

Analysis of pathological complete response rates with paclitaxel-based regimens in trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer

The study aimed to examine whether omission of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing chemotherapy alters pathological complete response rates in patients receiving trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. A total of 159 patients were identified. One hundred twenty-nine patients received platinum/5-FU concurrently with radiotherapy, and 30 received taxane/platinum-containing chemoradiotherapy prior to esophagectomy. Patients were staged using the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Patients were matched between chemotherapeutic groups, with no significant demographic or clinical differences other than T stage (14% T2 in the 5-FU group; no T2 in the platinum/taxane group) and radiotherapy technique (8.5% received intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the 5-FU group; 60% in the platinum/taxane group). Pathological complete response rates for 5-FU and platinum/taxane-based groups were not significantly different (45% and 30%, respectively; P = 0.1548). Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival were not statistically different between the two groups. Significant predictors of pathological complete response included N stage (56% N0 and 33% N1; P = 0.0083), histology (37% adenocarcinoma and 59% squamous cell; P = 0.0123), tumor location (39% distal and 59% proximal/mid; P = 0.048), gastroesophageal junction involvement (33% involved and 55% uninvolved; P = 0.005), and radiotherapy end-to-surgery interval (50% < 55 days and 34% ≥ 55 days; P = 0.04). Grades 3-4 hematological toxicity was higher in the 5-FU group (36%) than in the paclitaxel-containing therapy group (17%; P = 0.0484). Use of paclitaxel-containing chemoradiotherapy did not result in inferior pathological complete response, overall survival, or progression-free survival rates, and resulted in less hematological toxicity than 5-FU treatment.

Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (T3-4, N) have a poor prognosis. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy before esophagectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, only patients with major histopathologic response (regression to less than 10% of the primary tumor) after preoperative treatment will have a prognostic benefit of preoperative chemoradiation. Using current therapy regimens about 40% to 50% of the patients show major histopathological response. The remaining cohort does not benefit from this neoadjuvant approach but might benefit from earlier surgical resection. Therefore, it is an aim to develop tools for response prediction before starting the treatment and for early response assessment identifying responders. The current review discusses the different imaging techniques and the most recent studies about molecular markers for early response prediction. The results show that [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a good sensitivity but the specificity is not robust enough for routine clinical use. Newer positron emission tomography detector technology, the combination of FDG-PET with computed tomography, additional evaluation criteria and standardization of evaluation may improve the predictive value. There exist a great number of retrospective studies using molecular markers for prediction of response. Until now the clinical use is missing. But the results of first prospective studies are promising. A future perspective may be the combination of imaging technics and special molecular markers for individualized therapy. Another aspect is the response assessment after finishing neoadjuvant treatment protocol. The different clinical methods are discussed. The results show that until now no non-invasive method is valid enough to assess complete histopathological response.

Chemokines and their receptors in esophageal cancer--the systematic review and future perspectives

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive malignant solid tumor with rapid progression and unfavorable prognosis. The 5-year survival rate for EC patients was estimated to be less than 10 %. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve diagnostic tool and effective treatment therapies for EC patients. In our paper, the general structure and function of chemokines and their receptors as well as their role in cancer progression were shortly presented. Moreover, the aim of our paper was to summarize and refer the current findings concerning the role of selected chemokines and their receptors as candidates for tumor markers of EC. Some clinical investigations have proved the involvement of these proteins in proliferation, migration, invasiveness and metastasis of tumor cells. Increasing evidence from previous studies suggested that C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12), also known as stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR4 may provide novel diagnostic and prognostic strategies to reduce the burden of EC. Moreover, therapy targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis may open a new direction for treatment of EC patients. However, given their nonspecific nature, the diagnostic value of chemokines and their receptors may be limited. Therefore, future larger investigations, especially in the blood of EC patients, still need to be continued to further clarify the significance of these proteins as potential candidates for tumor markers in diagnosis and prognosis of EC patients.

Intended use for a neoadjuvant chemoradiation response prediction test for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: a survey analysis of thoracic surgeons in the US

OBJECTIVE

A multi-analyte immunohistochemistry (IHC) based test (DecisionDx-EC * *DecisionDx-EC, Castle Biosciences, Incorporated, Friendswood, TX. Hereafter referred to as the "IHC-based test". ) was developed and proved able to accurately predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCTRT) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EC) patients with locoregional disease. A survey was conducted with surgeons attending the 2013 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Annual Conference to assess their intention to change standard of care patient treatment based on predictive results obtained from this test.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-seven thoracic surgeons were provided a questionnaire regarding the current clinical management of locoregional EC patients, and their intention to change management strategy if a patient is predicted by the multi-analyte IHC-based test to experience pathological complete response (pathCR) or extremely resistant to neoCTRT (exCTRT).

RESULTS

Forty-four out of 46 enrolled respondents indicated that they administer neoCTRT followed by surgery to treat locally advanced EC. Fifteen (32%) respondents presently prescribing neoCTRT to EC patients acknowledged that a pathCR prediction provided by the multi-analyte IHC-based test would change their current regimens. Conversely, 28 surgeons (61%) would be willing to adjust their current strategy for patients predicted to be resistant to neoCTRT, significantly more than the case where patients are predicted to be pathCR (p = 0.01). Twenty-five percent (25%) of surgeons willing to adjust treatment in response to a patient being a potential exCTRT chose to remove CTRT from the strategy, and instead would choose surgery alone for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the current survey show that patients' response to neoCTRT predicted by the multi-analyte IHC-based test has a significant influence on the decision-making process in the clinic. Nearly twice as many surgeons stated an intention to change strategy with the knowledge that the patient is likely to have extreme resistance to planned treatments than when one is a potential responder. The current survey study is limited by its 'intended use' nature, therefore does not reflect physicians' real action in the clinic upon implementation of this test. However, survey results strongly suggest that use of the IHC-based predictive test is of great interest to physicians, and would likely contribute to more individualized treatment for patients with distinct sensitivity to neoCTRT.

Prognostic classification of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma according to impact on prognosis and to suggest a classification for clinical routine.

BACKGROUND

Measures of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer such as Mandard tumor regression grading focus on the effect on the primary tumor. Although lymph node infiltration is of significant prognostic importance, this criterion is mostly not included in the response classifications.

METHODS

A total of 370 patients (89% males, median age: 61 years) with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (40 Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) or chemotherapy (MAGIC or FLOT) for cT3, Nx, M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. All patients had undergone transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy, with a median of 27 resected lymph nodes and a R0-resection rate of 92%. Histopathologic regression grading differentiated major or minor response according to less or more than 10% vital cells in the primary tumor. The lymph nodes were classified as ypN0 or ypN+.

RESULTS

From the patients with R0 resection and M0 category, 3 groups with significantly different 5-year survival rates (5-YSR) could be differentiated: 1. Major response and ypN0 (n=100) with 5-YSR of 64% 2. Either major response and ypN+ (n=34) 5-YSR 42% or minor response and ypN0 (n=84) 5-YSR 44%, together 42% 5-YSR 3. Minor response and ypN+ (n=111) and 5-YSR of 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined classification of primary tumor regression and lymph node status in 3 grades represents a simple and reproducible prognostic classification of the effect of neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer leads to major histopathological response in less than 30 % of patients. Data on interim endoscopic response assessment do not exist. This exploratory prospective study evaluates early endoscopy after 50 % of the chemotherapy as predictor for later response and prognosis.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included (45 resected; 33 R0 resections). All patients received baseline endoscopy and CT scans, after 50 % of their chemotherapy (EGD-1, CT-1) and after completion of chemotherapy (EGD-2, CT-2). Interim endoscopic response (EGD-1) was assessed after having received 50 % (6 weeks) of the planned 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Post-chemotherapy response was clinically assessed by a combination of CT scan (CT-2) and endoscopy (EGD-2). Histopathological response was determined by a standardized scoring system (Becker criteria). Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction of >75 % of the tumor mass.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were responders at EGD-1 and 13 at EGD-2. Nine patients (19.1 %) were clinical responders and 7 patients (15.6 %) were histopathological responders after chemotherapy. Specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of the interim EGD-1 for subsequent histopathological response were 31/38 (82 %), 36/47 (76 %), and 31/33 (93 %); and for recurrence or death, 28/30 (93.3 %), 38/47 (80.9 %), and 28/35 (80.0 %). Response at EGD-1 was significantly associated with histopathological response (p = 0.010), survival (p < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Interim endoscopy after 6 weeks predicts response and prognosis. Therefore, tailoring treatment according to interim endoscopic assessment could be feasible, but the findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Incremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in therapeutic decision-making of potentially curable esophageal adenocarcinoma

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to estimate the incremental value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in aiding treatment decisions in a specific cohort of patients with lower esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who were considered for potentially curative treatment on the basis of conventional imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients referred for a staging F-FDG PET/CT who were considered for potentially curative treatment (neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy) by a multidisciplinary tumor board. The proportion of patients with M1b disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 6th ed.) detected on F-FDG PET/CT was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT for M1b disease were calculated. PET/CT findings were verified with histopathological analysis; when it was not possible to obtain pathological confirmation, correlative imaging or follow-up imaging studies were used for validation.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. F-FDG PET/CT detected M1b disease in 25 patients (16%), changing the intent of treatment from potentially curative to palliative. In five patients, PET/CT failed to detect distant metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT for detecting M1b disease were 83.3, 98.4, 92.5, 96.1, and 95.3%, respectively. Additional surgical procedures (hemicolectomy and polypectomy) were performed in three patients because of the detection of a second primary cancer in the colon in two patients and a colonic dysplastic polyp in one patient.

CONCLUSION

In patients who are considered to be potentially curable after conventional imaging, F-FDG PET/CT can detect unsuspected sites of distant metastases (M1b) in a significant number of cases and thus contribute to the clinical decision-making process. PET/CT should be an integral part of the staging workup of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Factors associated with false-negative endoscopic biopsy results after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The usefulness of endoscopic biopsy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is limited because of its high false-negative (FN) rates. However, data on the factors associated with FN biopsy results remain scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with FN results on endoscopic biopsies in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following nCRT. We retrospectively reviewed the records of ESCC patients who were treated at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, between 1999 and 2013. Inclusion criteria were receiving nCRT as first-line treatment before esophagectomy and having been preoperatively submitted to an endoscopic biopsy. Endoscopic findings at the lesion site were classified into 6 distinct categories: stricture, tumor, ulcer, scar, other findings, or normal. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with FN biopsy findings. A total of 227 patients were selected, of which 92 (41.9%) had positive biopsy results. Among patients with negative biopsy findings (n = 135), 85 were found to have residual cancer on the resected esophagus. Multivariate analysis identified endoscopic findings as the only independent predictor of FN biopsy results. The negative predictive values were 77.8%, 61.9%, 52.6%, 30.3%, 23.1%, and 20.0% for the normal, scar, other findings, ulcer, stricture, and tumor categories, respectively (P < 0.001). In ESCC patients, the FN rate of endoscopic biopsy after nCRT is associated with the type of residual lesion.

Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.

METHODS

In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.

Current advances in esophageal cancer proteomics

We review the current status of proteomics for esophageal cancer (EC) from a clinician's viewpoint. The ultimate goal of cancer proteomics is the improvement of clinical outcome. The proteome as a functional translation of the genome is a straightforward representation of genomic mechanisms that trigger carcinogenesis. Cancer proteomics has identified the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and tumor progression, detected biomarker candidates for early diagnosis, and provided novel therapeutic targets for personalized treatments. Our review focuses on three major topics in EC proteomics: diagnostics, treatment, and molecular mechanisms. We discuss the major histological differences between EC types, i.e., esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, and evaluate the clinical significance of published proteomics studies, including promising diagnostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets, which should be further validated prior to launching clinical trials. Multi-disciplinary collaborations between basic scientists, clinicians, and pathologists should be established for inter-institutional validation. In conclusion, EC proteomics has provided significant results, which after thorough validation, should lead to the development of novel clinical tools and improvement of the clinical outcome for esophageal cancer patients. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Medical Proteomics.