Lymph node ratio precisely predicts the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The matter of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in esophageal cancer (ESCA) was far from conclusive. Some evidence indicated that lymph node status could affect treatment. We evaluated lymph node ratio (LNR) as an indicator that could be applied to predict PORT benefit.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study collected the data of N1, N2, N3 stage ESCA patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) to analyze the association between LNR and prognosis from 2004 to 2015. Patients were categorized into two subsets based on the LNR cut-off value of 0.23 using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the proportion of overall survival (OS) and esophagus cancer-specific survival (CSS) in two LNR groups. Cox regression analysis and competitive risk model was adopted to investigate the impacts of LNR on prognosis.

RESULTS

Of 2,165 ESCA patients identified, 1,165 (53.8%) had LNR>0.23. The LNR was an independent prognostic factor and associated with better OS and CSS of LNR≤0.23 (P < 0.001). In competitive risk model, a worse CSS was analyzed of LNR>0.23 (HR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.53-1.91). Subgroup analyses indicated that PORT was associated with favorable OS and CSS. Furthermore, when stratified by Node stage, PORT was associated with a survival benefit only in N1 stage with higher LNR (LNR>0.23) after adjusting for other covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR exceeding 0.23 was negatively associated with prognosis in ESCA. The survival benefit from PORT in ESCA seems to be limited to LNR of 23% or more only in N1 stage. This study highlights the biomarker meaning of LNR on identifying PORT beneficiary in N1 stage.

Effect of Enteral Immunonutrition in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The efficacy of enteral immunonutrition (EIN) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of EIN administration in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods

From January 2000 to January 2022, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were thoroughly searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with EIN versus standard diet or no supplement in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Overall complications and infectious complications were the primary outcomes. The secondary results were non-infectious complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, and enteral nutrition-related complications.

Results

Thirty-five studies reporting 3,692 patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer (including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, periampullary cancer, or pancreatic cancer) were included. Compared with the control group, EIN group had a significantly decreased incidence of overall complications (RR = 0.79, p < 0.001). Infectious complications in patients who received EIN were considerably lower than in the control group (RR = 0.66, p < 0.001). Compared to the control group, the incidence of surgical site infection, abdominal abscess, anastomotic leakage, bacteremia, duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly lower in the specific infectious complications treated with EIN. Still, there was no significant difference between the two groups with other infectious complications. Moreover, a substantial shortening in the length of hospital stay was shown in EIN group compared with the control group. Still, no significant effect of EIN was demonstrated in non-infectious complicatios and mortality. The enteral nutrition-related complications had no significant difference between two groups.

Conclusions

EIN is safe and effective in reducing overall complications, infectious complications, and hospital stay in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery (including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, periampullary cancer, or pancreatic cancer).

Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete response when induction chemoradiation finished: A phase II random

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

More than 40% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) exhibit pathological complete responses (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and theoretically, these patients may be cured by CRT and omit surgery. This prospectively randomized pilot study compared definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with nCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC who achieved clinical complete responses (cCRs) to nCRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single center, randomized, open phase 2 study of 256 patients with locally advanced ESCC enrolled between April 2016 and November 2018. Immediately when nCRT finished, patients enrolled underwent response evaluations within 1 week. Patients with cCR were randomly allocated to undergo surgery (arm A) or complete CRT up to the definitive radiation dose (arm B). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Finally, 71 patients were randomly assigned to the nCRT (n = 36) and dCRT (n = 35) arms. The median observation time was 35.7 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 56.43% in arm A versus 54.73% in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.452 to 1.645, P = 0.652). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in arms A and B were 69.5% and 62.3% (HR = 0.824, 95% CI = 403-1.688, P = 0.597), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our treatment response evaluation criteria, survival of the patients with cCR after nCRT was not significant different between nCRT group and dCRT group. An optimized response evaluation strategy soon after nCRT may guide next therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer-who benefits?

PURPOSE

For years, there have been discussions on whether neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery (nRCT-S) is superior to definitive radiochemotherapy (dRCT) as the standard of care for locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer (OC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate our patient cohort regarding differences in survival and recurrence between nRCT‑S and dRCT.

METHODS

Data from 68 patients with dRCT and 33 patients with nRCT‑S treated from 2010 to 2018 were analysed. Comorbidities were recorded using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Recurrence patterns were recorded as in-field or out-field. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare survival data (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and locoregional control [LRC]).

RESULTS

Patients with nRCT‑S showed significantly lower CCI values than those with dRCT (p = 0.001). The median follow-up was 47 months. The median OS times were 31 months for nRCT‑S and 12 months for dRCT (p = 0.009), the median PFS times were 11 and 9 months, respectively (p = 0.057), and the median LRC times were not reached and 23 months, respectively (p = 0.037). The only further factor with a significant impact on OS was the CCI (p = 0.016). In subgroup analyses for comorbidities regarding differences in OS, the superiority of the nRCT‑S remained almost significant for CCI values 2-6 (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed significantly longer OS and LRC for patients with nRCT‑S than for those with dRCT. Due to different comorbidities in the groups, it can be deduced from the subgroup analysis that patients with few comorbidities seem to especially profit from nRCT‑S.

Preoperative Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer with 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel: Treatment Practice over a 20-Year Period and Implications for the Individual Treatment Modalities

Simple Summary

We retrospectively studied outcomes in patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell cancer. We put a special focus on the comparison of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin (‘Walsh’) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (‘CROSS’). First, the higher age and more comorbidities of ‘CROSS’ patients, along with a shorter intensive care/intermediate care unit stay, might reflect an improvement in supportive and surgical/perioperative procedures in the periods. Second, the ‘CROSS’ patients experienced more hematologic toxicity and were less likely to complete chemotherapy as per protocol. This indicates that efforts should be taken to guide patients through a toxic treatment regimen. Third, the negative prognostic impact of radiochemotherapy-related toxicities and the duration of the intensive care/intermediate care unit stay underlines that further optimization of treatment procedures remains an important goal. Toxicity profiles could be improved by tailoring the regimen to individual patients (e. g., careful use of the taxane-based regimen in elderly patients).

Abstract

We retrospectively studied outcomes in patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell cancer. We put special focus on the comparison of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin (‘Walsh’) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (‘CROSS’). We compared characteristics between patients treated according to ‘Walsh’ vs. ‘CROSS’. Cox regression was performed to test for an association of parameters with outcomes. Study eligibility was met by 90 patients. First, the higher age and more comorbidities of the ‘CROSS’ patients, along with a shorter intensive care/intermediate care stay, might reflect an improvement in supportive and surgical/perioperative procedures over the periods. Second, the ‘CROSS’ patients experienced more hematologic toxicity and were less likely to complete chemotherapy as per protocol. This indicates that efforts should be taken to guide patients through a toxic treatment regimen by supportive measures. Third, the negative prognostic impact of radiochemotherapy-related toxicities (i.e., dysphagia and hematologic toxicities) and the duration of the intensive care/intermediate care unit stay underlines that further optimization of treatment procedures remains an important goal. We found no differences in tumor downstaging and survival between treatment regimen. Toxicity profiles could be improved by tailoring the regimen to individual patients (e.g., careful use of the taxane-based regimen in elderly patients).

Neoadjuvant and Definitive Radiochemotherapeutic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Evaluation of 122 Cases in Daily Clinical Routine

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor entity with increasing occurrence. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC), particularly, is constantly rising in the Western world. The mainstays of therapy with curative intent for EC in advanced stages are neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (neoRCT) with surgery and definitive radiochemotherapy (defRCT).

METHODS

We examined our internal files to identify patients suffering from EC. Palliative cases were excluded. Statistical testing was performed by χ2 test, Student's t test, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two cases were included. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 92 cases and AC in 23 cases. Ninety-five patients underwent defRCT, 27 underwent neoRCT, and 114 (in both therapy regimes) received simultaneous chemotherapy. There was no difference in the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.654; HR 1.145; 95% CI 0.629-2.086) or and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.912) of patients who underwent neoRCT or defRCT. Median OS was 13.5 (2-197) months for defRCT patients and 19.5 (2-134) months for neoRCT patients (p = 0.751). Karnofsky index (KI) with a cut-off of 70% was strongest, but not a significant parameter for OS (p = 0.608) or PFS (p = 0.137).

CONCLUSION

defRCT is a valid and an equal alternative to neoRCT for patients suffering from EC. Selection of patients for therapy is of crucial relevance. Further studies and improvements in follow-up are needed when neoRCT has been completed before surgery, in order to spare the patient undergoing operative treatment if there is complete remission. The identification of valid markers urgently needed to limit treatment side effects.

miR-135a Inhibits the Invasion and Migration of Esophageal Cancer Stem Cells through the Hedgehog Signaling Pathway by Targeting Smo

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been reported to be involved in esophageal cancer (EC) development. Hence, we aim to explore whether microRNA-135a (miR-135a) affects EC and its associated mechanism. Cancerous and adjacent tissues from 138 EC patients were collected. The dual-luciferase reporter gene assay and bioinformatics analysis were used to confirm the interaction between nucleotides. A series of mimics or inhibitors of miR-135a or small interfering RNA (siRNA) against Smo were introduced into EC cells. After that, the expression of miR-135a and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway-related genes (Smo, Gli1, Shh, and Gli2) in tissues and cells was measured, accompanied by evaluation of cell viability, apoptosis, invasion, and migration. High expression of Smo, Gli1, Shh, and Gli2 and low expression of miR-135a were observed in EC. Smo was verified to be a target gene of miR-135a. In addition, overexpression of miR-135a or silencing of Smo decreased the expression of Gli1, Gli2, and Shh, thus inhibiting EC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and promoting apoptosis. Silencing of miR-135a was observed to reverse the inhibitory role of miR-135a in EC. These results suggest that miR-135a inhibited the migration and invasion of EC cells through inhibition of the Smo/Hh axis.

Tumor Remission and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes During Chemoradiation Therapy: Predictive and Prognostic Markers in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Clinical tools are unavailable for accurate prediction of pathologic responses to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before surgery. We evaluated tumor remission and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) during CRT as predictors of pathologic response and prognostic markers for patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with neoadjuvant CRT (neo-CRT) or definitive CRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed patients with locally advanced ESCC (N = 164) who underwent neo-CRT (N = 48) or definitive CRT (N = 116). Patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsies when induction CRT finished. Tumor remission characteristics were designated minor (-/+) to excellent remission (ER) (+++). TILs were determined in 10% increments. Tumor remission, TILs, or both were associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival in the neo-CRT group and then analyzed in the definitive CRT group.

RESULTS

ER and lymphocyte-predominant ESCC (LPE; ≥60% TILs) were identified according to the pCR rate and disease-free survival. We built a prediction model for pCR incorporating ER and LPE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.877, and sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 90.9%, respectively. Furthermore, this model identified pathologic response with an excellent calibration. Disease-free survival of patients with ER and LPE tumors was significantly longer than that of other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When we included tumor remission and TILs during CRT, our model predicted pCR with high probability and helped stratify prognostic subgroups, thereby guiding future therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Validation of this model in larger, prospective, multicenter studies is essential.

Survival benefit of surgery to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

To assess if surgery provided survival benefit to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we performed a retrospective review of 1230 patients who were newly diagnosed with stage T2-T4 esophageal SCC from 2007 to 2014 in our hospital. There were greater than 70% of patients with age under 65 years, and more than 85% were stage T3-T4 at the time of diagnosis. The median survival time was 1.06 year (95% CI 0.99–1.1 yrs). Survival analyses showed that survival time was significantly associated with age, T stage, clinical lymph node involvement and treatment modality (surgery versus definite chemoradiotherapy). Surgery still possessed a powerful impact on overall survival by multivariable analysis. Death risk of patients treated with curative surgery was significantly lower than those with definite chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, for patients of stage T3N(+) and T4, surgery combined with (neo-)adjuvant treatment were significantly associated with higher survival rate than surgery alone or definite chemoradiotherapy. In conclusion, the patients who undergo surgery were significantly associated longer survival, therefore, curative resection should be considered for esophageal cancer patients who are medically fit for surgery. Moreover, combined with (neo-)adjuvant treatment is recommended for surgically resectable stage T3-T4 esophageal SCC.

TNM Staging Matched-pair Comparison of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery Alone and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Introduction: We used the TNM staging matched-pair approach to compare the efficacies of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCT), surgery alone and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with localized advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 642 patients with ESCC from previous studies were studied. Patients whose treatment involved NCT + surgery and surgery alone were compared with patients receiving CCRT. Prospensity score matched-pair comparison based on pre-treatment TNM staging was developed to assess the efficacies of these treatment options. Results: Prospensity score matched-pair comparison to control for bias generated a cohort of 274 patients who were eligible for comparison. The 3-year OS rate was 70.0% in the NCT + surgery group, compared to 51.7% in the surgery group (p=0.000) and 61.9% in the CCRT group (p=0.082). With the TNM staging matched-pair approach, the CCRT group had more upper thoracic ESCC patients (43/92, 46.7%), while the surgery group had more lower thoracic ESCC patients (37/92, 40.2%). The 3-year OS rates were comparable between the surgery alone group and CCRT group (p=0.109). Conclusions: NCT plus surgery was superior in OS to surgery alone or CCRT. The 3-year OS rates were comparable between the surgery alone group and CCRT group with TNM staging matched-pair approach. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.

Interleukin-6 as a potential molecular target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Knowledge of potential tumor markers may improve chemotherapeutic efficacy. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression in local tumor tissues is associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in variety of cancer types. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role and potential application of IL-6 in determining the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma. KYSE170 and TE13 esophageal cancer cell lines were used to conduct cell- and animal-based experiments investigating biological changes and tumor behavior. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that 70–80% of cancer cells exhibited positive staining for IL-6, compared with <15% of non-malignant epithelial cells. These immunohistochemical results were consistent with the mRNA expression levels detetced. The IL-6 silencing vector significantly reduced invasion and proliferation of the two cell lines and attenuated tumor growth in xenograft mouse models (P<0.05). The IL-6 silencing vector markedly reduced the presence of Ki-67 (a typical proliferation marker) and microvessel density, indicating that downregulation of IL-6 levels may greatly affect tumor growth and inhibition. The IL-6 silencing vector increased E-cadherin and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression levels in the two esophageal carcinoma cell lines. This vector also regulated the release of IL-6 in cell supernatant and serum in KYSE170- and TE13-tumor-bearing mice. The secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and cluster of differentiation 31 (a nuclear protein) immunoreactive molecules were also reduced by the IL-6 silencing vector. Therefore, IL-6 may be an important trigger in the progression of angiogenesis and endothelial tube formation within the tumor, and targeting IL-6 may be a promising strategy for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary metastases from gastrointestinal cancers

The lung is one of the most common targets of metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Surgical treatment (i.e., metastasectomy) is an accepted therapeutic option for pulmonary metastases from GI cancers. However, surgery may be contraindicated in advanced stages of cancer, compromised lung function, and/or comorbidities. This issue has prompted the search for innovative and less invasive ways of treating pulmonary metastases. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted great interest as a minimally invasive approach against intrathoracic malignancies. In this technique, radiofrequency energy is applied via a needle electrode inserted into the target tissue. As the cells are agitated by the applied energy, they release heat, causing denaturation and cell death. Recently, this technique has been used on patients with pulmonary metastatic disease arising from GI cancers such as colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as on patients with primary lung cancer. The present review updates the clinical outcomes and advances in RFA therapy of lung metastases from GI cancers.

Radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary metastases from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used for the treatment of intrathoracic malignancies. Although RFA has been found to be promising in the treatment of lung metastases from some types of neoplasms, little is known concerning its clinical significance in the treatment of pulmonary metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This retrospective study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of computed tomography-guided RFA for pulmonary metastasis from ESCC. A series of 10 ESCC patients with 17 pulmonary tumors were included. Correct placement of the ablation device into the target tumor proved to be feasible in all tumors (100%). The mean visual analog scale score, with values that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible), was 1. This suggested that this procedure was well tolerated. No procedure-related deaths occurred. A pneumothorax needing drainage was a major complication in two patients. Local control of ablated tumor lasting for at least 1 year was achieved in 10 (83%) of 12 assessable tumors. Although locoregional recurrences developed in two tumors, these lesions could be recontrolled by repeat treatment with RFA. Three patients died of recurrent disease. The predicted 1- and 2-year overall survival rates after lung RFA were 77.8% and 62.2%, respectively. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided RFA yielded relatively high levels of local control in patients with pulmonary metastases from ESCC and was associated with an acceptable level of complications. It was concluded that a prospective study will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of systemic therapy and RFA for ESCC lung metastases.

KRAS and BRAF mutations in 203 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: pyrosequencing technology and literature review

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is one of the most promising targets for molecular-targeted therapies in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Thus, the molecular diagnosis of KRAS and BRAF mutations is clinically important in therapeutic decision making. However, the frequency of KRAS and BRAF mutations in ESCCs remains inconclusive because of the limited sample sizes of previous studies (all N ≤ 80). Pyrosequencing is a nonelectrophoretic nucleotide extension sequencing technology that can be used for mutation testing.

METHODS

The frequency of KRAS and BRAF mutations was examined using a nonbiased database of 203 resected ESCCs and a high-throughput pyrosequencing assay.

RESULTS

The validity of the KRAS pyrosequencing method was initially demonstrated by detection of all 4 types of KRAS mutations [c.35G>T (codon 12 GGT>GTT), c.35G>A (codon 12 GGT>GAT), c.34G>T (codon 12 GGT>TGT), c.38G>A mutation (codon 13 GGC>GAC)], which had been previously diagnosed using Scorpion-ARMS technology, in 9 colon cancer tissues (9 of 9; 100 %). Similar results were demonstrated for BRAF mutational status in 3 colon cancer cell lines (HCT116, Colo201, and HT29), which were validated by Sanger dideoxy sequencing. Subsequently, the KRAS mutation was found to be extremely rare (1 of 203; 0.5 %), and the BRAF mutation was absent (0 of 203; 0 %), in the dataset of 203 ESCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that KRAS and BRAF mutations play a limited role in the development of ESCC and that mutation analysis is not useful as a screening test for sensitivity to anti-EGFR therapy in ESCC.

IL-6 expression predicts treatment response and outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

The identification of potential tumor markers can improve therapeutic planning and patient management. The aim of this study was to highlight the significance of IL-6 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 173 patients with esophageal SCC, and examined the correlation between IL-6 levels and clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer patients. Furthermore, the human esophageal SCC cell line CE81T was selected for cellular and animal experiments to investigate changes in tumor behavior and treatment response after manipulation of IL-6 expression.

Results

In clinical outcome analysis, positive IL-6 staining and poor treatment response was significantly associated with shorter survival. Furthermore, the frequency of IL-6 immunoreactivity was significantly higher in esophageal cancer specimens than in non-malignant epithelium, and this staining was positively linked to the development of distant metastasis (p = 0.0003) and lower treatment response rates (p = 0.0001).By ELISA analysis, IL-6 serum levels were significantly elevated in patients developing disease failure.When IL-6 expression was inhibited, aggressive tumor behavior and radiation resistance could be overcome in vitro and in vivo. The underlying changes included increased cell death, less epithelial-mesenchymal transition and attenuated STAT3 activation. IL-6 inhibition was also associated with attenuated angiogenesis in tumor-bearing mice.

Conclusions

IL-6 was significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer. Targeting this cytokine could be a promising strategy for treatment of esophageal cancer, as evidenced by inhibition of aggressive tumor behavior and treatment resistance.

Outcome of patients with esophageal cancer: a nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is 1 of the 10 most common cancers and is a particular devastating form of cancer worldwide. More than 90% patients with esophageal cancer in Taiwan have squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In the present study, we assessed the factors affecting survival of patients with esophageal cancer using data from Taiwan, a high-incidence area for esophageal SCC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 12,482 patients who were newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer from 1998 to 2007. The data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Study participants were followed-up until the end of 2008.

RESULTS

Of the 12,482 patients, 11,490 (92.1%) were male with a median age of 60 years, and 992 (7.9%) were female with a median age of 71 years at the time of diagnosis. The overall 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates after diagnosis were 40.3, 22.9, 12.8, and 7.6%, respectively. Among parametric models for esophageal cancer prognosis, male sex, no curative treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy), old age, and low socioeconomic status were significantly associated with shorter survival. Furthermore, curative treatment with surgery improved the survival of esophageal cancer patients more significantly compared with patients who undergo definite radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that age, sex, and curative treatment were significant predictors of lifetime survival in patients with esophageal cancer. The overall survival rates of patients with esophageal cancer are relatively low, while survival of patients who undergo surgery is improved significantly.

Clinicopathological characteristics and optimal management for esophagogastric junctional cancer; a single center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junctional (EGJ) cancer occurs in the mucosa near the esophagogastric junction, and has characteristics of both esophageal and gastric malignancies; its optimal treatment strategy is controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent curative surgery with lymphadenectomy for EGJ cancer. Tumor specimens were categorized by histology and location into four types-centered in the esophagus < 5 cm from EGJ (type E), which were subtyped as (i) squamous-cell carcinoma (SQ) or (ii) adenocarcinoma (AD); (iii) any histological tumor centered in the stomach < 5 cm from EGJ, with EGJ invasion (type Ge); (iv) any histological tumor centered in the stomach < 5 cm from EGJ, without EGJ invasion (type G)-and classified by TNM system; these were compared to patients' clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 92 EGJ cancer patients were studied. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 35.5 months. Tumors were categorized as 12 type E (SQ), 6 type E (AD), 27 type Ge and 47 type G; of these 7 (58.3%), 3 (50%), 19 (70.4%) and 14 (29.8%) and 23 patients, respectively, had lymph node metastases. No patients with type E (AD) and Ge tumors had cervical lymph node metastasis; those with type G tumors had no nodal metastasis at cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that type E (AD) tumor was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

We should distinguish type Ge tumor from type E (AD) tumor because of the clinicopathological and prognostic differentiation. Extended gastrectomy with or without lower esophagectomy according to tumor location and lower mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenectomy are recommended for EGJ cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan, UMIN000008596.

The survival impact of XPA and XPC genetic polymorphisms on patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between survival outcome of esophageal cancer patients and the genetic variants in xeroderma pigmentosum groups A (XPA) and C (XPC), 2 important molecules in the nucleotide excision pathway for DNA repair.

METHODS

A total of 501 patients with a diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were enrolled in the study. The genetic variants of XPA in 5'UTR and those of XPC at exon 15 K939Q were analyzed with the TaqMan assay from the genomic DNA of peripheral leukocytes and correlated to the posttreatment survival outcome.

RESULTS

Patients with XPA 5'UTR A/G and XPC K939Q C/C genotypes were found to be imposed with a higher risk of mortality after treatment compared with patients with wild-type homozygous genotypes [adjusted HR (95 % CI) of death being 1.36 (1.06-1.74) and 1.34 (0.97-1.83), respectively]. Cox's multivariate analysis detected a statistically significant increased trend in risk of mortality with the accumulation of any of these 2 unfavorable genotypes compared with patients with other genotypes [adjusted HR (95 % CI) = 1.29 (1.08-1.53), P = .005]. The effect was more pronounced in the population treated with esophagectomy (P = .023) and undergoing concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The hereditary genetic variants in XPA and XPC can serve as independent predictors of the clinical outcome of patients with ESCC, especially in those who are treated with esophagectomy and undergo chemoradiation.

Alteration of HLA-F and HLA I antigen expression in the tumor is associated with survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Alteration of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression, such as decreased HLA I (HLA-A, -B and -C) antigens and elevated nonclassical HLA I antigens (HLA-E, -F and -G), was reported to have an unfavorable prognosis in various cancers. In our study, HLA-F expression in 105 primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) lesions and 62 case-matched adjacent normal tissues, and HLA I antigens among 68 cases were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Data revealed that HLA-F expression was observed in 58.1% (61/105) of the ESCC lesions and in 54.8% (34/62) of the normal esophageal tissues. Among the 62 case-matched samples, HLA-F expression (lesion vs. normal tissue) was upregulated, unchanged and downregulated in 13 (21.0%), 6 (9.6%) and 43 (69.4%) cases, respectively. Patients with HLA-F positive had a worse survival than those with HLA-F negative (p = 0.040). Patients with upregulated HLA-F expression (lesion vs. normal tissue) had significantly worse survival than those with HLA-F unchanged and downregulated (p = 0.010). Furthermore, decreased HLA I expression was observed in 41.2% (28/68) patients and was with worse prognosis in comparison to those with preserved HLA I expression (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that upregulated HLA-F expression (p = 0.026) and downregulated HLA I expression (p = 0.013) could be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor. In conclusion, our study provided the evidence that alteration of HLA I and HLA-F antigen expression was associated with survival in patients with ESCC.