1
|
Roets E, Ijzerman NS, Ho VKY, Desar IME, Reyners AKL, Gelderblom H, Grünhagen DJ, Van Etten B, Van Houdt WJ, Van der Graaf WTA, Steeghs N. Referral patterns of GIST patients: data from a nationwide study. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:28-34. [PMID: 38353407 PMCID: PMC11332507 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.23722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral. RESULTS This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached. CONCLUSION A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyne Roets
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nikki S Ijzerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent K Y Ho
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn Van Etten
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgical Oncology and gastrointestinal surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Winan J Van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Winette T A Van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steeghs EMP, Gelderblom H, Ho VKY, Voorham QJM, Willems SM, Grünberg K, Ligtenberg MJL. Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in daily clinical practice. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:990-1002. [PMID: 33909171 PMCID: PMC8338807 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01190-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular analysis of KIT and PDGFRA is critical for tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment selection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and hence recommended by international guidelines. We performed a nationwide study into the application of predictive mutation testing in GIST patients and its impact on targeted treatment decisions in clinical practice. METHODS Real-world clinical and pathology information was obtained from GIST patients with initial diagnosis in 2017-2018 through database linkage between the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry. RESULTS Predictive mutation analysis was performed in 89% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease. Molecular testing rates were higher for patients treated in expertise centers (96%) compared to non-expertise centers (75%, P < 0.01). Imatinib therapy was applied in 81% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease without patient's refusal or adverse characteristics, e.g., comorbidities or resistance mutations. Mutation analysis that was performed in 97% of these imatinib-treated cases, did not guarantee mutation-tailored treatment: 2% of these patients had the PDGFRA p.D842V resistance mutation and 7% initiated imatinib therapy at the normal instead of high dose despite of having a KIT exon 9 mutation. CONCLUSION In conclusion, nationwide real-world data show that over 81% of the eligible high risk or metastatic disease patients receive targeted therapy, which was tailored to the mutation status as recommended in guidelines in 88% of cases. Therefore, still 27% of these GIST patients misses out on mutation-tailored treatment. The reasons for suboptimal uptake of testing and treatment require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth M. P. Steeghs
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent K. Y. Ho
- Departments of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan M. Willems
- PALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Katrien Grünberg
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ,grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Laboratory of Tumor Genetics, Department of Pathology and Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahmed M. Recent advances in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:3142-3155. [PMID: 32874969 PMCID: PMC7441252 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare but an important clinical entity seen in our clinical practice. It is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract and most common malignancy of the small intestine. Although the exact prevalence of GIST is not known, the incidence of GIST has been increasing. GISTs arise from interstitial cells of Cajal. Most of the GISTs occur due to mutation in c-kit gene or platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha gene. 15% of GISTs do not have these mutations and they are called wild-type GISTs. Almost all GISTs express KIT receptor tyrosine kinase. Histologically, GISTs look like spindle cell tumors most of the time but they can be epitheloid or mixed type. The median size of GISTs varies from 2.7 cm to 8.9 cm. Clinically, patients with small GISTs remain asymptomatic but as the GIST size increases, patients present with various symptoms depending on the location of the GIST. Most of GISTs are located in the stomach or small bowel. Diagnosis is suspected on imaging and endoscopic studies, and confirmed by tissue acquisition with immunohistochemical staining. The aggressiveness of GISTs depends on the size, mitotic index and location. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice. But various endoscopic modalities of resection are increasingly being tried. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are extremely useful in the management of large GISTs, unresectable GISTs and metastatic GISTs. Treatment options for metastatic GISTs also include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hepatic artery embolization, chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monjur Ahmed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adherence to the guidelines and the pathological diagnosis of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the real world. Gastric Cancer 2020; 23:118-125. [PMID: 31041650 PMCID: PMC6942594 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00966-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multidisciplinary approach based on guidelines and pathological diagnosis by specialized pathologists are important for improving the prognosis and QoL of GIST patients. This study examined the adherence to the guidelines and the concordance of the pathological diagnosis of high-risk GISTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Among 541 patients with high-risk GISTs recruited to the prospective registry between Dec. 2012 and Dec. 2015, 534 patients were analyzed after central pathology with KIT and DOG1 IHC and genotyping of KIT and PDGFRA. RESULTS Of the 534 patients, 432 (81%) received imatinib adjuvant therapy at a starting dose of 400 or 300 mg/day. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88), tumor size (HR for > 10 cm vs < 5 cm, 3.87; 95% CI 1.72-8.74), mitosis (HR for > 10 vs < 5, 3.54; 95% CI 1.84-6.79), tumor rupture (HR 3.69; 95% CI 1.43-9.52) and performance status (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-0.99) were independently related to adjuvant therapy. Among the 534 high-risk GISTs diagnosed locally, 19 tumors (3.6%) were diagnosed as non-GISTs, and the other 93 (18.1%) GISTs were reclassified into lower risk categories by central pathology. Among 10 patients with non-GISTs and 8 patients with PDGFRA D842V mutations, 4 (40%) and 3 (38%) patients, respectively, continued the therapy after receiving the central pathology results. CONCLUSIONS The adherence to guidelines and the concordance of pathological diagnoses were comparatively good for high-risk GISTs. Central pathology may contribute to improved diagnosis, but further refinements may be required.
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Li Z, Xu Z, Jin X, Gong Y, Xia X, Yao Y, Xu Z, Zhou Y, Xu H, Li S, Peng Y, Wu X, Dai L. Proteomic Maps of Human Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Subgroups. Mol Cell Proteomics 2019; 18:923-935. [PMID: 30804049 PMCID: PMC6495251 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra119.001361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a common sarcoma of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) with high metastatic and recurrence rates, but the proteomic features are still less understood. Here we performed systematic quantitative proteome profiling of GIST from 13 patients classified into very low/low, intermediate and high risk subgroups. An extended cohort of GIST (n = 131) was used for immunohistochemical validation of proteins of interest. In total, 9177 proteins were quantified, covering 55.9% of the GIT transcriptome from The Human Protein Altas. Out of the 9177 quantified proteins, 4930 proteins were observed in all 13 cases with 517 upregulated and 187 downregulated proteins in tumorous tissues independent of risk stage. Pathway analysis showed that the downregulated proteins were mostly enriched in metabolic pathway, whereas the upregulated proteins mainly belonged to spliceosome pathway. In addition, 131 proteins showed differentially expressed patterns among GIST subgroups with statistical significance. The 13 GIST cases were classified into 3 subgroups perfectly based on the expression of these proteins. The intensive comparison of molecular phenotypes and possible functions of quantified oncoproteins, tumor suppressors, phosphatases and kinases between GIST subgroups was carried out. Immunohistochemical analysis of the phosphatase PTPN1 (n = 117) revealed that the GIST patients with high PTPN1 expression had low chances of developing metastasis. Collectively, this work provides valuable information for understanding the inherent biology and evolution of GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Liu
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhigui Li
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhiqiang Xu
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xiuxiu Jin
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yanqiu Gong
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xuyang Xia
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yuqin Yao
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhaofen Xu
- §Department of Pathology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang City, Sichuan province, Neijiang 641000, China
| | - Yong Zhou
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Heng Xu
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Shuangqing Li
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yong Peng
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xiaoting Wu
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China;.
| | - Lunzhi Dai
- From the ‡Department of General Practice and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China;.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raut CP, Espat NJ, Maki RG, Araujo DM, Trent J, Williams TF, Purkayastha DD, DeMatteo RP. Efficacy and Tolerability of 5-Year Adjuvant Imatinib Treatment for Patients With Resected Intermediate- or High-Risk Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: The PERSIST-5 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4:e184060. [PMID: 30383140 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Three years of adjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved overall survival in patients with high-risk primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) compared with patients who receive 1 year of treatment. The impact of a longer duration of therapy is unknown. Objective To determine whether adjuvant treatment for primary GIST with imatinib for 5 years is tolerable and efficacious. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial (Postresection Evaluation of Recurrence-free Survival for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors With 5 Years of Adjuvant Imatinib [PERSIST-5]) included adult patients with primary GIST (expressing KIT) at 21 US institutions who underwent a macroscopically complete resection and were at intermediate or high risk of recurrence, defined as primary GIST at any site measuring 2 cm or larger with 5 or more mitoses per 50 high-power field or nongastric primary GIST measuring 5 cm or larger. Data were collected from August 5, 2009, through December 20, 2016. Interventions Imatinib, 400 mg once daily, orally for 5 years or until discontinuation of therapy because of progression or intolerance. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary end point was overall survival. Results Of the 91 patients enrolled, 48 (53%) were men with a median age of 60 years (range, 30-90 years). Median tumor size was 6.5 cm (range, 2.3-30.0 cm). Median treatment duration was 55.1 months (range, 0.5-60.6 months); 46 patients (51%) completed 5 years of imatinib therapy. Estimated 5-year RFS was 90% (95% CI, 80%-95%), and overall survival was 95% (95% CI, 86%-99%). Recurrence was noted in 7 patients: 1 had disease recur while receiving imatinib (PDGFRA D842V mutation) and died; 6 had disease recur after discontinuation of imatinib therapy. Two additional deaths were unrelated to treatment or tumor progression. Forty-five patients (49%) stopped treatment early because of patient choice (10 [21%]), adverse events (15 [16%]), or other (11 [12%]). All 91 patients experienced at least 1 adverse event, and 17 (19%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance In this first adjuvant trial, to our knowledge, of patients with resected primary GIST who received 5 years of imatinib therapy, no patient with imatinib-sensitive mutations had disease recur during therapy. For patients in whom disease recurred, recurrence was within 2 years of discontinuation of imatinib therapy. Approximately half of the patients discontinued treatment early, most commonly because of patient choice, thus emphasizing the importance of close clinical monitoring to continue imatinib treatment for patients at appropriate risk. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00867113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrajit P Raut
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - N Joseph Espat
- Department of Surgery, Roger Williams Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Robert G Maki
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York.,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jonathan Trent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Treatment patterns, efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumour patients. Sci Rep 2017; 7:9519. [PMID: 28842575 PMCID: PMC5573380 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09132-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib was approved as third-line therapy for advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour (GIST) at a starting dose of 160 mg daily 3 weeks on, 1 week off, based on improvement in progression free survival over placebo (4.8 vs. 0.9 months), but the response rate was low at 4.5%. Given the high toxicity rate in GIST patients, there is variability in the post-marketing dosing of regorafenib. We aimed to summarize our experience regarding prescribing patterns, efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib and determine the role of response assessment by Choi criteria in GIST patients. We included 28 patients who received regorafenib from our pharmacy. Baseline patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were recorded and an independent radiologist assessed response using Choi and RECIST. Seventy-nine percent of patients started at a 120 mg continuous daily dosing schedule, different from the standard intermittent dosing schedule. Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced by 43% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 8.7 months. Continuous dosing with regorafenib at 120 mg daily is the preferred prescribing pattern and appears to be better tolerated and with comparable efficacy to the current standard dose. Similar to imatinib, the partial response rate for regorafenib by Choi (29%) was higher compared to RECIST (4%).
Collapse
|
8
|
Sokhandon F, Al-katib S, Bahoura L, Copelan A, George D, Scola D. Multidetector CT enterography of focal small bowel lesions: a radiological-pathological correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1319-1341. [PMID: 27999885 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-1015-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Focal small bowel lesions present a diagnostic challenge for both the radiologist and gastroenterologist. Both the detection and characterization of small bowel masses have greatly improved with the advent of multidetector CT enterography (MD-CTE). As such, MD-CTE is increasingly utilized in the workup of occult gastrointestinal bleeding. In this article, we review the spectrum of focal small bowel masses with pathologic correlation. Adenocarcinoma, the most common primary small bowel malignancy, presents as a focal irregular mass occasionally with circumferential extension leading to obstruction. Small bowel carcinoid tumors most commonly arise in the ileum and are characterized by avid enhancement and marked desmoplastic response of metastatic lesions. Aneurysmal dilatation of small bowel is pathognomonic for lymphoma and secondary findings of lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly should be sought. Benign small bowel masses such as leiomyoma and adenoma may be responsible for occult gastrointestinal bleeding. However, primary vascular lesions of the small bowel remain the most common cause for occult small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding. The arterial phase of contrast obtained with CTE aids in recognition of the vascular nature of these lesions. Systemic conditions such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and Crohn's disease may be suggested by the presence of multiple small bowel lesions. Lastly, potential pitfalls such as ingested material should be considered when faced with focal small bowel masses.
Collapse
|
9
|
Li J, Zhang H, Chen Z, Su K. Clinico-pathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors among a Chinese population. Oncol Lett 2015; 16:4905-4914. [PMID: 30250556 PMCID: PMC6144732 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract, exhibiting wide variability in their biological behavior. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of GISTs in Chinese patients. All GIST cases (n=182) retrieved from the pathology database and the archived files in Shanghai Changzheng Hospital between January 2011 and December 2014 were reviewed. The clinical symptoms, preoperative investigations, treatments, pathological characteristics and follow-up data of these patients were reviewed, and univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. A total of 73.1% of the GISTs were located in the stomach, and the most common three symptoms included abdominal pain (30.2%), dyspepsia (23.1%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (21.4%). Univariate analysis revealed that larger tumor size (P<0.001), higher mitotic rate (P<0.001), aggressive behavior (P<0.001), negative smooth muscle actin expression (P=0.009) and palliative resection (P<0.001) contributed toward poor overall survival (OS). In addition, non-gastric disease location (P<0.001), larger tumor size (P<0.001), higher mitotic rate (P=0.004), aggressive behavior (P<0.001) and palliative resection (P<0.001) were associated with poor relapse-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis indicated that mitotic rate [hazard ratio (HR=3.761, P=0.015)] and aggressive behavior (HR=3.916, P=0.010) were independent risk factors for OS, while non-gastric location (HR=4.740, P=0.002) and aggressive behavior (HR=4.009, P=0.004) were independent risk factors for RFS. The present study provided information on the clinicopathological characteristics and epidemiology of GISTs in the Chinese population. Non-gastric disease location, higher mitotic rate and tumor metastasis or local invasion prior to treatment were identified as predictors of a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiehua Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Haitian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Zhibai Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Ka Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning, Guangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Søreide K, Sandvik OM, Søreide JA, Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 40:39-46. [PMID: 26618334 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 452] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare, yet the most common mesenchymal tumour within the digestive tract. Lack of diagnostic criteria and no specific code in the ICD system has prevented epidemiological evaluation except from overt malignant cases in the past. A global estimate of incidence and disease patterns has thus not been available. METHODS A systematic literature search of all available population-based studies on GIST published between January 2000 and December 2014 were reviewed. Descriptive epidemiological data are presented. RESULTS The search found 29 studies of more than 13,550 patients from 19 countries that reported sufficient data for regional or national population-based statistics. Age at diagnosis ranged from 10 to 100 years, with median age being mid 60s across most studies. Gender distribution was equal across studies. On average, 18% of patients had an incidental diagnosis (range from 5% to 40%). Anatomical location of primary tumour in 9747 GISTs demonstrated gastric location as the most frequent (55.6%) followed by small bowel (31.8%), colorectal (6.0%), other/various location (5.5%) and oesophagus (0.7%). Most studies reported incidence at 10-15 per million per year. Notably, lowest incidence was in China (Shanxi province) with 4.3 per million per year. Highest incidence rates were reported also from China (Hong Kong and Shanghai areas), and in Taiwan and Norway (Northern part), with up to 19-22 per million per year. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiology of GIST demonstrates some consistent features across geographical regions. Whether the reported extreme differences in incidence reflect real variation in population risk warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Oddvar M Sandvik
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Vanja Giljaca
- Department of Internal medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - V Ramesh Bulusu
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choi AH, Hamner JB, Merchant SJ, Trisal V, Chow W, Garberoglio CA, Kim J. Underreporting of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Is the True Incidence Being Captured? J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1699-703. [PMID: 26001370 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2860-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital cancer registries are only required to report gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) if labeled malignant or metastatic, leading to potential loss of cases in national cancer registries. Our objective was to determine whether GISTs are underreported in the US. METHODS Retrospective review of pathology reports between 2010 and 2013 with diagnosis of GIST was performed at two academic medical centers. Recurrent GISTs were excluded. Pathology reports were cross-referenced to cases reported by each cancer registry. Risk for metastasis/death was determined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. RESULTS Forty-nine cases of non-recurrent GIST were identified. Only 19/49 (38.8%) cases were reported. None of the 30 non-reported cases were labeled malignant/metastatic on final pathology. To illustrate malignant potential, these tumors were risk stratified. Most (60%) of the non-reported cases were low risk, but there were 4 (13.3%) cases each in the intermediate, high, and unknown risk groups. Additionally, 7/30 (23.0%) cases were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, highlighting clinical concern of malignant GIST. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that nearly two thirds of GIST cases have been underreported, suggesting that current reporting practices underestimate its true incidence. Revision of reporting guidelines may result in a more accurate estimation of the US disease burden of GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey H Choi
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barrios CH, Blackstein ME, Blay JY, Casali PG, Chacon M, Gu J, Kang YK, Nishida T, Purkayastha D, Woodman RC, Reichardt P. The GOLD ReGISTry: a Global, Prospective, Observational Registry Collecting Longitudinal Data on Patients with Advanced and Localised Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:2423-33. [PMID: 26248685 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal sarcomas. This global, prospective registry followed patients with advanced or localised GIST (2007-2011). METHODS Current and evolving diagnostics, treatments and outcome measures in patients with GIST were assessed. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced or localised GIST within 15months of registry entry. No treatment plan was prescribed, and no visit schedule was mandated. Treating physicians recorded patient information, including tumour response, diagnostic methods, medications, surgeries performed, mutation status and adverse events leading to dose/medication changes. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Other data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS The registry included 1663 patients (advanced GIST, n=1095; localised GIST, n=537). Medications (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitor use and dosing), disease progression or recurrence and physician assessment of response to treatment in registry patients were consistent with controlled trials and prevailing clinical recommendations. In advanced GIST, estimated 30-month progression-free survival (PFS) (59.8%) and overall survival (OS) (82.7%) were higher than results from previously reported trials (≈40% and ≈70%, respectively). Consistent with treatment guidelines, the most common initial treatments were imatinib for advanced GIST, and complete surgical resection for localised GIST. Computed tomography scans were the most common imaging technique used at diagnosis and follow-up. Mutation analysis was performed at diagnosis in only 15.3% and 14.5% of patients with advanced and localised GIST, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world GIST registry, patients with advanced GIST were treated with imatinib and patients with localised GIST received surgical resection, in accordance with prevailing clinical recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Matias Chacon
- Alexander Fleming Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Jin Gu
- Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Yoon-Koo Kang
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Toshirou Nishida
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan.
| | - Das Purkayastha
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marano L, Boccardi V, Marrelli D, Roviello F. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: From clinicopathological features to surgical outcomes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2015; 41:814-22. [PMID: 25956211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Revised: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Duodenal gastrointestinal tumors represent an extremely rare subset of stromal tumors arising from interstitial cells of Cajal. In the last 30 years the comprehension of the pathophysiology and natural history of this previously misunderstood clinical entity, in association with developments in endoscopy, imaging technology, and immunohistochemistry has resulted in novel diagnostic and treatment approaches. This is a comprehensive review of the current data of the literature on the various aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors. The duodenum is the less commonly involved site for these tumors in the digestive tract. Endoscopy and computed tomography can usually establish the diagnosis, confirmed by immunohistochemical staining and occasionally molecular genetic analysis. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration has been recently found to be the gold diagnostic standard with high sensitivity and specificity rates, diagnosing GIST in up to 80% of patients. Due to the complex anatomy of the pancreatico-duodenal region optimal therapeutic strategy of duodenal GISTs are challenging. Nevertheless surgical resection with microscopically clear resection margins seems to be the only potentially curative treatment for non-metastatic primary GISTs of the duodenum. Imatinib mesylate plays a key role in the management of GISTs both as neoadjuvant therapy and in patients with recurrent and metastatic disease. Meanwhile, the advances in the comprehension of the pathophysiology and natural history of this previously misunderstood clinical entity as well as the treatment of these tumors may render feasible, in the near future, the advent of newer and more effective treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Marano
- Unit of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
| | - V Boccardi
- Unit of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - D Marrelli
- Unit of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - F Roviello
- Unit of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang M, Xu J, Zhang Y, Tu L, Qiu WQ, Wang CJ, Shen YY, Liu Q, Cao H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 15-years' experience in a single center. BMC Surg 2014; 14:93. [PMID: 25403624 PMCID: PMC4254179 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is known for its wide variability in biological behaviors and it is difficult to predict its malignant potential. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics and prognostic factors of GIST. Methods Clinical and pathological data of 497 GIST patients in our center between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed. Results Patients were categorized into very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups according to modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification system. Among the 401 patients untreated with imatinib mesylate (IM), 5-year overall survival (OS) in very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups was 100%, 100%, 89.6% and 65.9%; and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 100%, 98.1%, 90.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that sex, tumor size, mitotic rate, risk grade, CD34 expression, and adjacent involvement were predictors of OS or RFS. COX hazard proportional model (Forward LR) showed that large tumor size, high mitotic rate, and high risk grade were independent risk factors to OS, whereas high mitotic rate, high risk grade and adjacent organ involvement were independent risk factors to RFS. The intermediate-high risk patients who received IM adjuvant therapy (n = 87) had better 5-year OS and RFS than those who did not (n = 188) (94.9% vs. 72.1; 82.3% vs. 56.3%, respectively). Similarly, advanced GIST patients underwent IM therapy (n = 45) had better 3-year OS and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those who didn’t (n = 42) (75.6% vs. 6.8%; 87.6% vs. 12.4%, respectively). Conclusions Very low- and low-risk GISTs can be treated with surgery alone. Large tumor size, high mitotic rate, high risk grade, and adjacent organ involvement contribute to the poor outcome. IM therapy significantly improves the survival of intermediate-high risk or advanced GIST patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2482-14-93) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hui Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Floor 11, Building 7, NO, 1630, Dongfang Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhao WY, Xu J, Wang M, Zhang ZZ, Tu L, Wang CJ, Cao H, Zhang ZG. Evaluation of high-risk clinicopathological indicators in gastrointestinal stromal tumors for prognosis and imatinib treatment outcome. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14:105. [PMID: 24906683 PMCID: PMC4057930 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-14-105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although the clinical benefit of imatinib adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been proven, the recurrence rate still remains high. This study aimed to sub-divide high-risk GIST patients with some “very high-risk” factors for more precise prognostic indicator, and possible association with efficiency of imatinib adjuvant therapy. Methods Clinicopathological data were confirmed by pathological diagnosis and clinical records. Recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were evaluated in 370 GIST patients (212 cases as test cohort and 158 cases as validation cohort) and 48 high-risk GISTs with imatinib adjuvant therapy after R0 resection. Results Mitosis count > 10/50 high-power fields (HPF) and serosal invasion are independent prognostic factors for RFS of GIST patients. Mitosis count > 10/50HPF and serosal invasion can sub-divide high-risk GIST patients effectively and significantly improve the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for prognostic indicator both in test and validation cohort. Patients with serosal invasion after R0 resection showed a poorer prognosis with imatinib adjuvant therapy. Conclusions Sub-division of high-risk GIST patients helps to more precisely predicting the prognosis. Serosal invasion may be an adverse predictive factor in high-risk patients and imatinib treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hui Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iorio N, Sawaya RA, Friedenberg FK. Review article: the biology, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39:1376-86. [PMID: 24749828 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract with an increasing incidence. AIMS To review the biology, diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. METHODS A PubMed search using the phrases 'Gastrointestinal stromal tumor', 'imatinib', 'c-kit'. RESULTS The diagnosis of GIST is established by histology supplemented by the immunohistochemical marker CD117, which is positive in 95% of cases. The most common site of the tumour is the stomach. Most GIST are benign with 20-30% malignant. Five-year survival for malignant GIST ranges between 35% and 65% and depends primarily on tumour size, mitotic index and location. The malignant behaviour of GIST is best assessed by invasion of adjacent structures and distant metastases. The gold standard for treatment is surgical resection. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the primary therapy for unresectable, recurrent or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and they vary in presentation. When surgical resection is not achievable, imatinib is the treatment of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Iorio
- Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Starczewska Amelio JM, Cid Ruzafa J, Desai K, Tzivelekis S, Muston D, Khalid JM, Ashman P, Maguire A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in the United Kingdom at different therapeutic lines: an epidemiologic model. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:364. [PMID: 24884940 PMCID: PMC4039646 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumourgst (GIST) who fail currently available treatments imatinib and sunitinib (third-line treatment-eligible GIST) is unknown, but is expected to be below an ultra-orphan disease threshold of 2/100,000 population used in England and Wales. Our study was designed to estimate the prevalence and absolute number of UK patients with unresectable/metastatic GIST at first-, second- and eventually third-line treatment. METHODS Our open population model estimates the probability that the prevalence of UK third-line treatment-eligible GIST patients will remain under the ultra-orphan disease threshold. Model parameters for incidence, proportion of unresectable/metastatic disease and survival estimates for GIST patients were obtained from a targeted literature review and a UK cancer register. The robustness of the results was checked through differing scenarios taking extreme values of the input parameters. RESULTS The base-case scenario estimated a prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST of 1/100,000 and a prevalence count of 598 with a 99.9% likelihood of being below the ultra-orphan disease threshold. The extreme scenarios, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and threshold analysis confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST is very low and highly likely below the ultra-orphan disease threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Cid Ruzafa
- Health Economics and Epidemiology, Evidera, Metro Building, 6th floor, No.1 Butterwick, London W6 8DL, UK
| | - Kamal Desai
- Health Economics and Epidemiology, Evidera, Metro Building, 6th floor, No.1 Butterwick, London W6 8DL, UK
| | - Spiros Tzivelekis
- Global Market Access, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin S157, 03, 305, Germany
| | - Dominic Muston
- Health Economics, Bayer plc, Strawberry Hill, Newbury RG14 1JA, UK
| | - Javaria Mona Khalid
- Health Economics and Epidemiology, Evidera, Metro Building, 6th floor, No.1 Butterwick, London W6 8DL, UK
| | - Philip Ashman
- Health Economics, Bayer plc, Strawberry Hill, Newbury RG14 1JA, UK
| | - Andrew Maguire
- Health Economics and Epidemiology, Evidera, Metro Building, 6th floor, No.1 Butterwick, London W6 8DL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bakoyiannis A, Delis S, Triantopoulou C, Dervenis C. Rare cystic liver lesions: A diagnostic and managing challenge. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:7603-7619. [PMID: 24282350 PMCID: PMC3837259 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2013] [Revised: 09/09/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cystic formations within the liver are a frequent finding among populations. Besides the common cystic lesions, like simple liver cysts, rare cystic liver lesions like cystadenocarcinoma should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. Thorough knowledge of each entity’s nature and course are key elements to successful treatment. Detailed search in PubMed, Cochrane Database, and international published literature regarding rare cystic liver lesions was carried out. In our research are included not only primary rare lesions like cystadenoma, hydatid cyst, and polycystic liver disease, but also secondary ones like metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors lesions. Up-to date knowledge regarding diagnosis and management of rare cystic liver lesions is provided. A diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm is also proposed. The need for a multidisciplinary approach by a team including radiologists and surgeons familiar with liver cystic entities, diagnostic tools, and treatment modalities is stressed. Patients with cystic liver lesions must be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, in order to receive the most appropriate treatment, since many cystic liver lesions have a malignant potential and evolution.
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Crona
- University of North Carolina (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, NC, USA
| | | | - Christine M. Walko
- University of North Carolina (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, NC, USA
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liang X, Yu H, Zhu LH, Wang XF, Cai XJ. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: Surgical management and survival results. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:6000-6010. [PMID: 24106400 PMCID: PMC3785621 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i36.6000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2013] [Revised: 07/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To provide long-term survival results of operable duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs) in a tertiary center in China.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, the pathological data of 28 patients with DGISTs who had been treated surgically at the Second Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) from June 1998 to December 2006 were reviewed. All pathological slides were examined by a single pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. In patients whose diagnosis was not confirmed by immunohistochemistry at the time of resection, representative paraffin blocks were reassembled, and sections were studied using antibodies against CD117 (c-kit), CD34, smooth muscle actin (SMA), vimentin, S-100, actin (HHF35), and desmin. Operative procedures were classified as wedge resection (WR, local resection with pure closure, without duodenal transection or anastomosis), segmental resection [SR, duodenal transection with Roux-Y or Billroth II gastrojejunostomy (G-J), end-to-end duodenoduodenostomy (D-D), end-to-end or end-to-side duodenojejunostomy (D-J)], and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, Whipple operation with pancreatojejunostomy). R0 resection was pursued in all cases, and at least R1 resection was achieved. Regional lymphadenectomy was not performed. Clinical manifestations, surgery, medical treatment and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Related studies in the literature were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 12 males and 16 females patients, with a median age of 53 years (20-76 years). Their major complaints were “gastrointestinal bleeding” (57.2%) and “nonspecific discomfort” (32.1%). About 14.3%, 60.7%, 17.9%, and 7.1% of the tumors originated in the first to fourth portion, respectively, with a median size of 5.8 cm (1.6-20 cm). Treatment was by WR in 5 cases (17.9%), SR in 13 cases (46.4%), and by PD in 10 cases (35.7%). The morbidity and mortality rates were 35.7% and 3.6%, respectively. The median post-operative stay was 14.5 d (5-47 d). During a follow-up of 61 (23-164) mo, the 2-year and 5-year relapse-free survival was 83.3% and 50%, respectively. Eighty-four related articles were reviewed.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons can choose to perform limited resection or PD for operable DGISTs if clear surgical margins are achieved. Comprehensive treatment is necessary.
Collapse
|
21
|
de la Fuente SG, Deneve JL, Parsons CM, Zager JS, Conley AP, Gonzalez RJ. A comparison between patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours diagnosed with isolated liver metastases and liver metastases plus sarcomatosis. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15:655-60. [PMID: 23458233 PMCID: PMC3948531 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2012] [Accepted: 10/17/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to compare overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases with that of patients with synchronous metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis on a background of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). METHODS Patients presenting with metastatic GISTs during 1999-2009 were identified. Survival outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS Of the 193 patients with GISTs, 43 patients presented with isolated hepatic metastases and 16 presented with synchronous metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis. Thirteen patients with metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis underwent surgery, and 34 patients with metastatic disease solely to the liver underwent hepatic resection. The proportion of patients treated with preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was similar in both groups. Similar OS was observed in both groups (isolated liver metastases group: 40.5 months; liver metastases and sarcomatosis group: 28.7 months; P = 0.620). CONCLUSIONS Overall survival in patients with GIST and metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis is similar to that in patients with isolated metastatic liver disease. Although patients with a greater disease burden might be expected to show worse survival, these data do not reflect this assumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Colin M Parsons
- Department of Sarcoma Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Health SystemsSan Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Sarcoma Oncology, Moffitt Cancer CenterTampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Oncology, Moffitt Cancer CenterTampa, FL, USA
| | - Ricardo J Gonzalez
- Department of Sarcoma Oncology, Moffitt Cancer CenterTampa, FL, USA,Correspondence Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Moffitt Cancer Center, MCC Sarcoma Program, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Tel: + 1 813 745 6161. Fax: + 1 813 745 8337. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bulusu VR, Fullarton J, Leahy M, Morgan C, Rasheed A, Taniere P, Toh S, Verrill M, White J, Judson I. Rationale and design of a UK database for a rare cancer type: the GEM Registry for gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:1403-7. [PMID: 23963143 PMCID: PMC3776973 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Revised: 06/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in the management of and changes in clinical practice, little is known about the epidemiology, patterns of care and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients in the UK. Patient registries are receiving increasing attention as they can provide important information on clinical practice and patient outcomes. The rationale and study design of the GIST Epidemiology and Management (GEM) Registry, which forms part of the routine clinical practice for GISTs in several UK centres, are described. Methods: The GEM Registry is a secure web-based registry system designed around a Microsoft Access core using SQL interface. Demographic, surgical, histopathological and clinical data will be captured including treatment outcomes and survival. The registry was piloted in six centres and following further fine tuning of the data sets, ethical committee submission and approval was completed. Results: The GEM National Registry is the first of its kind to be implemented in rare cancers in UK. The registry is being rolled out initially in selected centres with the aim to expand to other centres. The first publication reporting analyses of the central data set is anticipated for the summer of 2013. Conclusion: GEM Registry will enable us to obtain a clear picture of incidence/prevalence of GISTS in UK. Clinicians will be able to review the prognostic and predictive value of variables in a large prospective data set. The data can be used for planning the delivery and improving the quality of care. This information is likely to inform clinical practice and, in years to come, guide the development and implementation of clinical trials for novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The results will not only benefit the GIST community, but also serve as a basis for the study of other rare tumour types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V R Bulusu
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor has received a lot of attention over the last 10 years due to its unique biologic behavior, clinicopathological features, molecular mechanisms, and treatment implications. GIST is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract and has emerged from a poorly understood and treatment resistant neoplasm to a well-defined tumor entity since the discovery of particular molecular abnormalities, KIT and PDGFRA gene mutations. The understanding of GIST biology at the molecular level promised the development of novel treatment modalities. Diagnosis of GIST depends on the integrity of histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. The risk assessment of the tumor behavior relies heavily on pathological evaluation and significantly impacts clinical management. In this review, historic review, epidemiology, pathogenesis and genetics, diagnosis, role of molecular analysis, prognostic factor and treatment strategies have been discussed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hensel M, Brust J, Plöger C, Schuster D, Memmer ML, Franz-Werner J, Feustel HP, Karcher A, Fuxius S, Mosthaf FA, Rieger M, Ho AD, Witzens-Harig M. Excellent long-term survival of 170 patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia treated in private oncology practices and a university hospital. Ann Hematol 2012; 91:1923-8. [PMID: 22895554 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-012-1545-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2012] [Accepted: 07/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare treatment and outcome of patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) in four private oncology practices (PP) and a university hospital (UH) in southwest Germany. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with WM of the last two decades of four PP in Mannheim, Heidelberg, Karlsruhe, and Speyer and the Department of Hematology of the University of Heidelberg. One hundred seventy patients could be identified, 74 from PP, 96 from the UH. Median age was 63.3 years. Patients from PP were older (median 65.3 vs. 62.5 years, p = 0.01). Only 54 % of patients from PP have received treatment during the observation time, as compared to 78.1 % of the UH (p < 0.001). In PP, 35 % of treated patients have received rituximab, as compared to 62.6 % of the patients of the UH (p < 0.001). Sixty percent of treated patients of PP have received bendamustine, as compared to only 8 % of the patients of the UH (p < 0.001). Time to first treatment was significantly shorter in patients from the UH compared to PP (median 13.7 vs. 52.9 months, p = 0.05). A trend towards a better overall survival was observed for patients treated with a rituximab-containing first-line regimen. The International Prognostic Scoring System for WM had significant prognostic value. Median overall survival was 25.0 years and did not differ between PP and UH. Despite different treatment strategies between PP and UH today overall survival of patients with WM is excellent, and better than previously reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hensel
- Mannheimer Onkologie Praxis, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Sasane M, Trent JC. Effectiveness of adjuvant imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor: results of a population-based, matched-cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin 2012; 28:805-14. [PMID: 22506625 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.685928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data are limited on the use of adjuvant imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) outside of clinical trials. This retrospective, population-based, matched-cohort study evaluated adjuvant imatinib treatment patterns, assessed impact on clinical outcomes, and estimated effectiveness based on number needed to treat (NNT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS GIST-related claims from the PharMetrics claims database were included (2000-2010). A stepwise identification algorithm identified appropriate patients based on GIST-related ICD-9-CM codes, who were classified as 'imatinib (IM) patients' receiving imatinib within 84 days post-surgery and 'non-imatinib (non-IM) patients' undergoing surgery but not receiving imatinib during the study period. The primary composite outcome was based on incidence of a second GIST-related surgery and long-term follow-up in the matched cohorts. IM patients were matched with up to eight non-IM patients on age, gender, ICD-9-CM code, and first surgery date. RESULTS A total of 118 IM and 4088 non-IM patients with possible GIST ICD-9s and surgery were included. The median duration between first and second surgeries was significantly longer in IM than non-IM patients (488 vs. 290 days; p = 0.0005). IM patients also had longer median follow-up from initial surgery to composite outcome (433 vs. 320 days; p = 0.002). Adherence to IM, measured by medication possession ratio, was 0.83 and 0.73 during the first and second years of treatment, respectively. IM patients were less likely to have the composite outcome compared with non-IM patients (hazard ratio = 0.501; p = 0.0005). The NNT to prevent one outcome was 4. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving adjuvant imatinib treatment were less likely to have second surgery or be lost to follow-up, and had a longer interval to second surgery. Although treatment with adjuvant imatinib in patients with primary GIST is effective, adherence to imatinib and treatment duration are less than recommended by current treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hind T Hatoum
- College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Call J, Walentas CD, Eickhoff JC, Scherzer N. Survival of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients in the imatinib era: life raft group observational registry. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:90. [PMID: 22429770 PMCID: PMC3364851 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2011] [Accepted: 03/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), one of the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, prior to routine immunohistochemical staining and the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, were often mistaken for neoplasms of smooth muscle origin such as leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas or leiomyoblastomas. Since the advent of imatinib, GIST has been further delineated into adult- (KIT or PDGFRα mutations) and pediatric- (typified by wild-type GIST/succinate dehydrogenase deficiencies) types. Using varying gender ratios at age of diagnosis we sought to elucidate prognostic factors for each sub-type and their impact on overall survival. METHODS This is a long-term retrospective analysis of a large observational study of an international open cohort of patients from a GIST research and patient advocacy's lifetime registry. Demographic and disease-specific data were voluntarily supplied by its members from May 2000-October 2010; the primary outcome was overall survival. Associations between survival and prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, with backward selection at P < 0.05 used to identify independent factors. RESULTS Inflections in gender ratios by age at diagnosis in years delineated two distinct groups: above and below age 35 at diagnosis. Closer analysis confirmed the above 35 age group as previously reported for adult-type GIST, typified by mixed primary tumor sites and gender, KIT or PDGFRα mutations, and shorter survival times. The pediatric group (< age 18 at diagnosis) was also as previously reported with predominantly stomach tumors, females, wild-type GIST or SDH mutations, and extended survival. "Young adults" however formed a third group aged 18-35 at diagnosis, and were a clear mix of these two previously reported distinct sub-types. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric- and adult-type GIST have been previously characterized in clinical settings and these observations confirm significant prognostic factors for each from a diverse real-world cohort. Additionally, these findings suggest that extra diligence be taken with "young adults" (aged 18-35 at diagnosis) as pediatric-type GIST may present well beyond adolescence, particularly as these distinct sub-types have different causes, and consequently respond differently to treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Call
- Life Raft Group, 155 Route 46 West, Suite 202, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA
| | | | - Jens C Eickhoff
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-4675, USA
| | - Norman Scherzer
- Life Raft Group, 155 Route 46 West, Suite 202, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA
| |
Collapse
|