Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel Versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung - A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of first-line nedaplatin (80 mg/m²) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m²) (ND) versus cisplatin (75 mg/m²) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m²) (CD) in patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

This open-label randomized controlled phase III trial was performed at 12 hospitals in China. Patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma were randomized to four cycles of ND or CD. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included time to progression, best overall response, and adverse events.

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat analysis set (ND: n = 141; CD: n = 139), median PFS was 4.63 months (95% confidence interval: 4.43-5.10) for the ND and 4.23 months (95% confidence interval: 3.37-4.53) for CD groups (p = 0.056). No significant difference in time to progression was observed between the two groups. Best overall responses and disease control rate were better with ND 51.5%, than with CD 38.1% (p = 0.033 and p = 0.0004, respectively). Grade III or IV adverse events and grade 3-4 nausea and fatigue were more frequent in the CD group compared with the ND group (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no improvement in PFS with the nedaplatin and docetaxel combination in the intent-to-treat analysis. More hematologic toxicities were observed in the ND group (compared with CD), whereas more nonhematologic toxicities were observed in the CD group. ND could be a new treatment option for advanced or relapsed squamous cell lung cancer (NCT02088515 at ClinicalTrials.gov).

Novel chemotherapy regimens for advanced lung cancer: have we reached a plateau?

Lung cancer remains the most significant contributor of cancer-related mortality globally. Despite the significant progress over the last decade with the introduction of targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), chemotherapy is still the appropriate treatment for the majority of patients. Based on clinical evidence, platinum-containing regimens have been established as the cornerstone of treatment as of today. Research efforts to optimize chemotherapy outcomes have led to novel chemotherapy regimens such as the combination of platinum plus pemetrexed as well as the addition of bevacizumab in patients with advanced non squamous NSCLC, and the combination of carboplatin with nanoparticle-albumin bound paclitaxel regardless of histology. In this article, we review clinical data regarding the recent evolution of chemotherapy in the advanced NSCLC setting, and critically evaluate the progress in therapeutic efficacy in terms of survival. We conclusively state that chemotherapy alone has reached a therapeutic plateau and report the current trends in clinical research combining chemotherapy with novel systemic therapies.

Phase I study of Nedaplatin, a platinum based antineoplastic drug, combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Background This study was designed to determine the recommended dose of a combination of nedaplatin (NED) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients received escalating doses of NED on day 1 and nab-PTX on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks by an intravenous infusion for up to six cycles. Results A dose of 100 mg/m² NED and 100 mg/m² nab-PTX was determined to be the recommended dose for patients with advanced squamous NSCLC. The study had an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.4-88.2) and disease control rate of 93.3% (95% CI: 68.1-99.8). The median progression-free survival time and survival time was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.9-8.1) and 13.1 months (95% CI: 6.2-20.1), respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (grade 3/4, 33%) and leukopenia (grade 3/4, 27%). Although peripheral neuropathy was observed in 5 patients (grade 1/2), non-hematological toxic effects were relatively mild. Febrile neutropenia, pneumonitis, and treatment-related death were not observed. Conclusions The combination of NED and nab-PTX was a tolerable and effective regimen and its recommended dose was 100 mg/m² and 100 mg/m², respectively, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced squamous NSCLC (UMIN000010963).

Meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of nedaplatin-based regimens between squamous cell and non-squamous cell lung cancers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of several subtypes, including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell lung cancer, large cell lung cancer, and other rarer types. Platinum-based regimens are currently the standard for treatment of advanced NSCLC. Nedaplatin is reportedly associated with a high response rate in squamous cell lung cancer. However, the relevant studies are small and mainly descriptive. The purpose of this meta-analysis was therefore to compare the efficacy of nedaplatin in squamous cell lung cancer with that in non-squamous cell lung cancer. Studies concerning nedaplatin-based regimens in NSCLC patients were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE. The response rate for nedaplatin-based regimens in squamous cell lung cancer (ORR: 55.6%, 95% CI: 52.5-58.7%) was higher (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.17-2.05) than that for non-squamous cell lung cancer (ORR: 34.4%, 95% CI: 32.3-36.5%). In addition, Taxane plus nedaplatin produced a longer overall and progress-free survival than CPT-11 or gemcitabine plus nedaplatin. To verify these findings, future well-controlled clinical studies will be needed.

Modification of platinum sensitivity by KEAP1/NRF2 signals in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of platinum-based drugs on nuclear-factor erythroid2 like 2 (NRF2) signaling in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines with or without Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) mutations and to determine the role of NRF2 and KEAP1 on platinum-based drug treatment.

METHODS

We used real-time PCR to assess relative mRNA expression and used western blotting and immunofluorescence assays to assess protein expression. Small interfering RNA and shuttle plasmids were used to modulate the expression of NRF2, wild-type KEAP1, and mutant KEAP1. Drug sensitivity to platinum-based drugs was evaluated with Cell Count Kit-8.

RESULTS

We found that platinum-based therapies modified the NRF2 signaling pathway differently in KEAP1-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines compared with wild-type KEAP1 cell lines. The reactive degree of NRF2 signaling also varies between nedaplatin and cisplatin. The modification of NRF2 or KEAP1 expression in NSCLC cell lines disrupted downstream gene expression and cell sensitivity to platinum-based drugs. Finally, gene expression data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) consortium indicated that KEAP1 mutation significantly affects NRF2 signaling activity in patients with NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that NRF2 signaling plays an indispensable role in NSCLC cell sensitivity to platinum-based treatments and provides a rationale for using NRF2 as a specific biomarker for predicting which patients will be most likely to benefit from platinum-based treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Nedaplatin in Advanced Breast Cancer Therapy

PURPOSE

To compare the time-to-treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse effects of regimens including nedaplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC).

METHODS

A total of 171 patients with ABC (admission between July 2008 and July 2013) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received either nedaplatin 75 mg/m(2) (arm N; n = 85) or cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (arm C; n = 86) in combination with other second-generation chemotherapeutic drugs, such as paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1.25 g/m(2), and navelbine 25 mg/m(2) every 21 days (nedaplatin, cisplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel on day 1; gemcitabine, navelbine on days 1 and 8). The primary endpoint was TTF in each arm; secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and toxicity.

RESULTS

In the assessable patient population, in arm N, median TTF and OS was 13.87 months (95% CI: 11.55-16.19) and 31.53 months (95% CI: 28.42-34.64), respectively, with an ORR of 48.2%. In arm C, median TTF and OS was 8.7 months (95% CI: 5.82-11.59) and 24.87 months (95% CI: 18.98-30.75), respectively, with an ORR of 37.2%. The occurrence of grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was more frequent (45.9% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.003) in arm N than in arm C. However, grade ≥2 nonhematologic toxicity was less frequent in arm N than in arm C (12.9% vs. 46.5%, p = 2.05 × 10(-7)).

CONCLUSIONS

Nedaplatin-based chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and efficiently improved patients' quality of life characterized by prolonged TTF and OS, with a marginal ORR.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin and nedaplatin in patients with untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with amrubicin and nedaplatin for patients with untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Amrubicin was given on days 1-3, with nedaplatin given on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In the phase I trial, the initial amrubicin dose of 25 mg/m(2) was escalated in 5-mg/m(2) increments until the maximum tolerated dose was reached, with the dose of nedaplatin fixed at 100 mg/m(2). In the phase II trial, the primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), assuming 20% for a standard therapy and 40% for a target therapy (α = 0.05 and β = 0.20), and the estimated required total number of patients was 35. In the phase I study, nedaplatin 100 mg/m(2) and amrubicin 25 mg/m(2) was recommended. In the phase II study, 17 out of 35 patients achieved a partial response, and the ORR was 48.6%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 62.9, 11.4 and 11.4% of cycles, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5 cycles (3.9%) and all cases were manageable. The recommended dose of this combination is well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Nedaplatin- versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the survival time of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Nedaplatin (NDP) has been extensively used to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the last decade. The present study compared the survival benefits of NDP and cisplatin (DDP) in the treatment of NSCLC. Patients (n=392) with NSCLC were treated with at least two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Among these patients, 202 received DDP-based chemotherapy, and 190 received NDP-based chemotherapy. The overall survival time of the two groups and the toxicity of drugs were analyzed. The results showed that only the chemotherapy cycle duration was found to be statistically different between DDP and NDP groups in all the characteristics. The mean chemotherapy duration was 3.3 cycles in the DDP group, and 4.1 cycles in the NDP group (χ²=20.206, P<0.001). Additionally, the chemotherapy cycle number was also an independent predictive factor for the overall survival time in the multivariate analysis (HR=0.539, P<0.001). The median survival time (MST) was 15 months in the DDP group, and 20 months in the NDP group (χ²=5.189, P=0.023). The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 62.4, 25.7 and 15.8%, and 78.9, 38.9, and 16.8% in the DPP and NDP groups, respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting, anorexia and weight loss was higher in the DDP compared to the NDP group (36.1 vs. 8.4%, 17.3 vs. 5.8%, and 9.9 vs. 1%, respectively). In conclusion, NDP-based chemotherapy had a survival benefit compared to DDP-based chemotherapy for NSCLC patients, due to the lower toxicity of NDP, which renders this drug more tolerable, thus allowing patients to undergo more cycles of chemotherapy.

Nedaplatin or oxaliplatin combined with paclitaxel and docetaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Both nedaplatin and oxaliplatin combined with paclitaxel or docetaxel have demonstrated potent activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but there is no study comparing the difference between these 2 chemotherapy regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety between the combination chemotherapy of nedaplatin or oxaliplatin plus paclitaxel and docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with stage III-IV unresectable NSCLC from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 at Southwest Hospital. They all received nedaplatin (80 mg/m2, nedaplatin group) or oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, oxaliplatin group) combined with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2) as first-line treatment.

RESULTS

There are 174 patients enrolled - 123 patients in the nedaplatin group and 51 patients in the oxaliplatin group. The objective response rates were 47.3% and 34.1% and the disease control rates were 87.5% and 79.5% in nedaplatin and oxaliplatin groups, respectively. The progression-free survival time was 10.4 months and 9.6 months (p=0.722) and the overall survival time was 18.5 months and 25.5 months in the nedaplatin and oxaliplatin groups, respectively (p=0.09). Total toxicity was greater in the oxaliplatin group (p=0.008), but there is no significant difference among ¾ grade adverse events between the 2 groups (P=0.595).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of nedaplatin plus paclitaxel and docetaxel is the same as oxaliplatin plus paclitaxel and docetaxel, and the toxicity of nedaplatin is well tolerate as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Nedaplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine in Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin/gemcitabine (NG) and carboplatin/gemcitabine (CG) in the management of untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC were recruited between June 2006 and November 2007. Subjects were randomly assigned to the NG arm (n=30) and the CG arm (n=32). Only patients (24 and 25 in the NG and CG arms, respectively) who completed ≥2 chemotherapy cycles were included in the data analysis. The primary outcome measure was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy measures (ORR, P=0.305; median PFS, P=0.198; median OS, P=0.961) or in the major adverse events (grade 3/4 neutropenia, P=0.666; grade 3/4 anemia, P=0.263; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, P=0.212) between the two treatment arms. However, there was a trend towards higher ORR (37.5% vs. 24.0%), longer PFS (6.0 vs. 5.0 months), and less adverse events in the NG arm.

CONCLUSION

NG regimen seems to be superior over CG regimen for advance NSCLS, but further investigation is needed to validate this superiority.