1
|
Kumari S, Bhatla N, Ray C, Arora B, Mathur S, Kumar S, Kumar L. Borderline tumours of ovary and fertility preservation-Outcomes from a tertiary care center in India. Curr Probl Cancer 2024; 50:101097. [PMID: 38598972 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are characterized by atypical epithelial proliferation without stromal invasion and majority are diagnosed in women of reproductive age group desirous of fertility preservation. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with BOT and on regular follow up at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, during a nine-year study period from March 2014 to March 2023 was performed. Surgical treatment was classified as radical or fertility sparing surgery (FSS). Surgical staging was defined as complete, partial or un-staged. RESULTS Median age of 91 women was 34 years. Follow up period ranged from 4 to 222 months (median 77 months). Among 68 premenopausal women, 31 (46 %) underwent radical surgery and FSS in 37 (54 %) cases. Median time to conception in 29 women with future fertility wishes was 13 months (range, 4 to38 m). Seven of 29 cases (29 %) required ovulation induction. The pregnancy rate was 82.7 % and live birth rate was 80 %. Eight cases (8.7 %) had a recurrence (7- un-staged, 1- partially staged) and median time to recur was 36 months. There was no significant difference in recurrence between cystectomy/oophorectomy. Ovary was the site of recurrence in all surgically salvaged cases except peritoneal cavity in 1 case with mortality. Relapse free survival at 5 and 10 years in FSS and radical surgery group were similar. CONCLUSION FSS is a safe procedure and should be considered in young patients desirous of future fertility along with a comprehensive peritoneal staging. Reproductive outcomes are excellent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarita Kumari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Chandrima Ray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Bhawna Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Mathur
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sunesh Kumar
- Department of Gynaecology, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Lalit Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Artemis Hospitals, Gurugram, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitchell S, Ramajayan T, Sayasneh A. Borderline tumour recurrence: how quickly does the tumour grow? BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e259501. [PMID: 38724214 PMCID: PMC11085964 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-259501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This abstract describes a case of the growth of a serous borderline tumour recurrence and cyst to papillary projection ratio with associated ultrasound images. The aetiology, presentation and management of such cases are explored and compared to the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian Mitchell
- Department of Women's Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thushanee Ramajayan
- Department of Women's Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ahmad Sayasneh
- Gynaecological Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cang W, Liang C, Wang D, Xue X, Cao D, Yang J, Pan L, Wu M, Yang J, Xiang Y. Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Advanced-Stage Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5827. [PMID: 37762767 PMCID: PMC10531562 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Our study aimed to analyze the prognosis and reproductive outcomes of patients with advanced-stage serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). This study included patients aged ≤ 45 years diagnosed with advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics II and III) SBOTs who were treated with FSS. Conservative surgeries were performed in 65 patients with advanced-stage SBOT with a median age of 28 years (range, 16-44 years). Nine patients had invasive implants. The median follow-up was 81.7 months. Forty-six patients (70.8%) had a relapse (median time to first recurrence, 22.8 months). Thirteen patients subsequently developed recurrence as an invasive disease, and two died due to disease progression. After multivariate analysis, age < 30 years and incomplete cytoreduction were independent risk factors for recurrence. Invasive implants and postoperative residual tumors were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival. Of 35 patients attempting to conceive, 12 underwent assisted reproductive technology. Additionally, 19 pregnancies, including 15 full-term births, were documented. FSS provides a good chance of reproductive success in women with advanced-stage SBOT who desire fertility preservation, but it has a high recurrence rate and risk of malignancy transformation. Patients with invasive implants should be strictly selected for FSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Cang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Chao Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xiaowei Xue
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Dongyan Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jiaxin Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Lingya Pan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Junjun Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yang Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grisham RN, Slomovitz BM, Andrews N, Banerjee S, Brown J, Carey MS, Chui H, Coleman RL, Fader AN, Gaillard S, Gourley C, Sood AK, Monk BJ, Moore KN, Ray-Coquard I, Shih IM, Westin SN, Wong KK, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1331-1344. [PMID: 37591609 PMCID: PMC10511962 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Compared with high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is a less frequent epithelial ovarian cancer type that is poorly sensitive to chemotherapy and affects younger women, many of whom endure years of ineffective treatments and poor quality of life. The pathogenesis of this disease and its management remain incompletely understood. However, recent advances in the molecular characterization of the disease and identification of novel targeted therapies with activity in low-grade serous carcinoma offer the promise of improved outcomes. To update clinicians regarding recent scientific and clinical trial advancements and discuss unanswered questions related to low-grade serous carcinoma diagnosis and treatment, a panel of experts convened for a workshop in October 2022 to develop a consensus document addressing pathology, translational research, epidemiology and risk, clinical management, and ongoing research. In addition, the patient perspective was discussed. The recommendations developed by this expert panel-presented in this consensus document-will guide practitioners in all settings regarding the clinical management of women with low-grade serous carcinoma and discuss future opportunities to improve research and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
- Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Nicole Andrews
- STAAR Ovarian Cancer Foundation, Western Springs, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jubilee Brown
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Wake Forest University, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark S Carey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Gaillard
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Honor Health, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kwong-Kwok Wong
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdallah R, Chamsy D, Dagher C, Hajjar R, El Housheimi A, Seoud M, Khalil A. Borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective cohort study on single institution experience, practice patterns and outcomes. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:3600-3604. [PMID: 36250321 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2130204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) commonly affect young nulliparous women, thus making fertility-preserving approaches more desirable. Women who opt for conservative management should be counselled about disease recurrence. In this retrospective study, the medical records of 57 women with BOT treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Centre between January 1986 and May 2018 were reviewed. Clinical, pathologic, and demographic data were collected and analysed to identify variables associated with poor clinical outcomes including advanced disease and risk of recurrence. Younger and nulliparous women were more likely to undergo fertility-sparing surgery. The open approach was adopted for women with larger adnexal masses and was associated with more blood loss with a mean difference of 172 mL (95% CI [110-235], p-value < .001) but no significant difference in operative time and length of hospital stay compared to the laparoscopic approach. CA-125 correlated with an advanced International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (p = .004). The recurrence rate was found to be 7% with a median recurrence time of 41.5 months.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? BOTs are common in young nulliparous women who often desire fertility-sparing procedures. Prognostic factors associated with disease severity and recurrence remain controversial.What do the results of this study add? This study presents an opportunity to understand the disease behaviour and compare local practices and outcomes to what was reported in the literature. CA-125 appears to be a useful marker in predicting the stage of BOT.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Future research should focus on exploring whether BOTs with micropapillary features represent an aggressive histologic subtype more prone to recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Abdallah
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Dina Chamsy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Christian Dagher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rima Hajjar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alaa El Housheimi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Muhieddine Seoud
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Khalil
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prognosis and Prognostic Factors of Serous Borderline Tumor-Micropapillary Variant: Retrospective Study of 200 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:1655422. [PMID: 36262351 PMCID: PMC9576405 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1655422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective To determine the oncofertility outcomes and prognostic factors in a large series of serous borderline ovarian tumor-micropapillary variant (SBOT-M) with a long-term follow-up. Methods Consecutive patients with SBOT-Ms treated from two affiliated hospitals of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic factors on invasive recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were analyzed, and outcomes of patients treated with conservative and radical surgery were compared. Results From 2000 to 2020, 200 patients were identified and followed. After a median follow-up of 68 months, 81 patients relapsed. In the multivariate analyses, younger age at diagnosis and conservative surgery that preserved fertility potential were independently associated with worse DFS (p = 0.018 and <0.001, respectively). Twenty-three patients experienced invasive recurrence, and seven died of progressive disease. Multivariate analysis showed that nulliparous and advanced FIGO stage were independently adversely associated with lethal recurrence (p = 0.022 and 0.029, respectively). Only advanced FIGO stage at diagnosis was associated with worse overall survival at univariate analysis (p = 0.02). Among 61 patients attempting conception, 37 achieved 44 pregnancies and resulted in 32 live births. Conclusions In this series, patients with SBOT-M have an acceptable oncofertility outcomes. The use of conservative surgery was independently associated with worse DFS, but without an impact on neither invasive relapse nor on overall survival. Patients with advanced FIGO stages had a significantly higher risk of lethal recurrence and worse overall survival, suggesting that adequate staging surgery and intensive postoperative surveillance should be warranted.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaballa K, Abdelkhalek M, Fathi A, Refky B, Belal K, elaraby M, Zuhdy M. Management of borderline ovarian tumors: A tertiary referral center experience in Egypt. Front Surg 2022; 9:962820. [PMID: 36117821 PMCID: PMC9478369 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.962820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIn this retrospective study, we discuss our experience as a large tertiary referral center in Egypt in the management and follow-up of borderline tumorsPatients and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study where all patients diagnosed with a borderline ovarian tumor at Oncology Center Mansoura University from November 2014 to June 2020 were included. Demographics, preoperative, operative, postoperative, pathologic, and oncologic follow-up data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained electronic database. The included patients were followed until April 2022.ResultsWe included 27 patients with borderline ovarian tumors. The mean age of the study patients was 47.67 ± 16.39 years. The median CA 125 was 33 (6–304 U/ml). Frozen section examination was utilized in 13 patients (48.14%), where a diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors was revealed in 8 patients. Recurrence was reported in one patient with serous type after approximately 26 months. The most common pathological type in our cohort was the mucinous borderline type reported in 14 patients (51.9%), followed by the serous type reported in 11 patients (40.7%), and the seromucinous type in 1 patient only. Patients with mucinous borderline type were significantly younger (40.083 ± 18.47 vs. 53.73 ± 11.91 years, p = 0.028). Interestingly, Cancer Antigen 125 levels were significantly higher in mucinous than serous and seromucinous types [67(16–304) vs. 20(6–294.6) U/ml, p = 0.027]. On the other hand, the radiological tumor size of serous and seromucinous types was larger than that of the mucinous type [23(19–31) cm vs. 8(5–20) cm, p = 0.001]. Over a median follow-up period of 58.66 (54.16–63.16) months, only one postoperative mortality was reported, while only one recurrence was reported.ConclusionBorderline ovarian tumors still represent a dilemma either in diagnosis or management. A frozen section examination could help to reach a preliminary diagnosis. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are the cornerstone of surgical management; however, fertility-sparing surgery could be a valid option for women desiring fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Gaballa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- Correspondence: Khaled Gaballa
| | - Mohamed Abdelkhalek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Adel Fathi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Basel Refky
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khaled Belal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Moustafa elaraby
- Ministry of Health, Consultant of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohammad Zuhdy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ozenne A, De Berti M, Body G, Carcopino X, Graesslin O, Kerbage Y, Akladios C, Huchon C, Bricou A, Mimoun C, Raimond E, Ouldamer L. Risk Factors for Recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumours after Conservative Surgery and Impact on Fertility: A Multicentre Study by the Francogyn Group. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133645. [PMID: 35806930 PMCID: PMC9267171 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) represent 10–20% of epithelial tumours of the ovary. Although their prognosis is excellent, the recurrence rate can be as high as 30%, and recurrence in the infiltrative form accounts for 3% to 5% of recurrences. Affecting, in one third of cases, women of childbearing age, the surgical strategy with ovarian conservation is now recommended despite a significant risk of recurrence. Few studies have focused exclusively on patients who have received ovarian conservative treatment in an attempt to identify factors predictive of recurrence and the impact on fertility. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative treatment and the impact on fertility. Material and methods: This was a retrospective, multicentre study of women who received conservative surgery for BOT between February 1997 and September 2020. We divided the patients into two groups, the “R group” with recurrence and the “NR group” without recurrence. Results: Of 175 patients included, 35 had a recurrence (R group, 20%) and 140 had no recurrence (NR group, 80%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months (IQ 8–62.5), the overall recurrence rate was 20%. Recurrence was BOT in 17.7% (31/175) and invasive in 2.3% (4/175). The mean time to recurrence was 29.5 months (IQ 16.5–52.5). Initial complete peritoneal staging (ICPS) was performed in 42.5% of patients (n = 75). In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of peritoneal implants, and the presence of a micropapillary component for serous tumours were factors influencing the occurrence of recurrence. The post-surgery fertility rate was 67%. Conclusion: This multicentre study is to date one of the largest studies analysing the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative surgery. Five risk factors were found: age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of implants, and a micropapillary component. Only 25% of the patients with recurrence underwent ICPS. These results reinforce the interest of initial peritoneal staging to avoid ignoring an advanced tumour stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Ozenne
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Marion De Berti
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Gilles Body
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France;
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene Avinée, 59037 Lille, France;
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, EA 7285 Risques Cliniques et Sécurité en Santé des Femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier Hospital, 93140 Bondy, France;
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisiere Hospital, 750019 Paris, France;
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-47-47-47-41; Fax: +33-2-47-47-92-73
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kasaven LS, Chawla M, Jones BP, Al-Memar M, Galazis N, Ahmed-Salim Y, El-Bahrawy M, Lavery S, Saso S, Yazbek J. Fertility Sparing Surgery and Borderline Ovarian Tumours. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061485. [PMID: 35326636 PMCID: PMC8946233 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is now a widely acceptable treatment for the management of Borderline Ovarian Tumours (BOTs) in women of reproductive age. However, many clinicians face the dilemma of balancing the risks of disease recurrence with progression to lethal malignancy whilst preserving fertility, in the absence of clear standardized guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes in women who underwent FSS for the management of primary, or recurrent presentation of BOTs, to provide clinicians with further evidence of the safety and feasibility of FSS. Oncological outcomes following a novel method of FSS in the form of laparoscopic ultrasound guided ovarian wedge resection has also been introduced, which has the potential to change the way BOTs are managed in the future in women of reproductive age. Abstract To determine the oncological outcomes following fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for the management of Borderline Ovarian Tumours (BOTs). A retrospective analysis of participants diagnosed with BOTs between January 2004 and December 2020 at the West London Gynaecological Oncology Centre was conducted. A total of 172 women were diagnosed; 52.3% (90/172) underwent FSS and 47.7% (82/172) non-FSS. The overall recurrence rate of disease was 16.9% (29/172), of which 79.3% (23/29) presented as the recurrence of serous or sero-mucinous BOTs and 20.7% (6/29) as low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). In the FSS group, the recurrence rate of BOTs was 25.6% (23/90) presenting a median 44.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 41.5) months, of which there were no episodes of recurrence presenting as LGSC reported. In the non-FSS group, all recurrences of disease presented as LGSC, with a rate of 7.7% (6/78), following a median of 47.5 months (IQR 47.8). A significant difference between the type of surgery performed (FSS v Non-FSS) and the association with recurrence of BOT was observed (Pearson Chi-Square: p = 0.000; x = 20.613). Twelve women underwent ultrasound-guided ovarian wedge resection (UGOWR) as a novel method of FSS. Recurrence of BOT was not significantly associated with the type of FSS performed (Pearson Chi- Square: x = 3.166, p = 0.379). Non-FSS is associated with negative oncological outcomes compared to FSS, as evidenced by the higher rate of recurrence of LGSC. This may be attributed to the indefinite long-term follow up with ultrasound surveillance all FSS women undergo, enabling earlier detection and treatment of recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine S. Kasaven
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
- Department of Cutrale Perioperative & Ageing Group, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Mehar Chawla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminister NHS Foundation Trust, London TW7 6AF, UK; (M.C.); (B.P.J.)
| | - Benjamin P. Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminister NHS Foundation Trust, London TW7 6AF, UK; (M.C.); (B.P.J.)
| | - Maya Al-Memar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK;
| | - Nicolas Galazis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (N.G.); (Y.A.-S.)
| | - Yousra Ahmed-Salim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (N.G.); (Y.A.-S.)
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK;
| | - Stuart Lavery
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK;
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.S.); (J.Y.)
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.S.); (J.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qi Y, Wang M, Yang Y, Zeng Z, Zhou Y. Analysis of Factors Influencing Relapse and Pregnancy in Patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumors. J Cancer 2021; 12:5275-5285. [PMID: 34335944 PMCID: PMC8317534 DOI: 10.7150/jca.56387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study analyzed the factors affecting recurrence in patients after surgery with borderline ovarian tumors and postoperative recurrence and pregnancy after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), to provide guidance for clinical treatment of borderline ovarian tumors and propose a therapeutic strategy for fertility protection. Methods: A total of 415 patients with borderline ovarian tumors were initially operated on in the gynecology ward of Shengjing Hospital Affiliated with China Medical University from September 1, 2013, to September 1, 2019. Central pathology review and prospective follow-up were carried out. The clinical and pathological data were consulted through the medical record query system of our hospital. The recurrence and pregnancy of the patients were investigated through telephone follow-up and outpatient and inpatient medical records. The influence of clinical and pathological variables on recurrence and pregnancy were evaluated using univariate/multivariate analyses. Results: In this study, 415 patients were collected, of which 21 lost follow-up, and a total of 394 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 25 patients relapsed with a recurrence rate of 6.3% and there were 196 patients with fertility-sparing surgery, of the 63 patients attempting to conceive, 35 were able to attain pregnancy with a pregnancy rate of 55.6%. All patients survived until the follow-up deadline. In univariate and multivariate analyses, FSS, FIGO stage, and micropapillary pattern were independent risk factors for recurrence of BOTs. FIGO stage, micropapillary pattern were independent risk factors for recurrence of BOTs with FSS. The risk of recurrence was not related to omentectomy nor postoperative chemotherapy. While omentectomy and chemotherapy had an impact on the pregnancy rate (P <0.05) and the pregnancy rate of patients without omentectomy or chemotherapy was higher. Conclusion: Omentectomy did not affect recurrence and it is not recommended as a routine operation. Adjuvant chemotherapy does not reduce the recurrence rate. While omentectomy and chemotherapy had an impact on the pregnancy rate, and both of them should be carried out more carefully in patients with fertility requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Qi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yuwei Yang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhi Zeng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yingying Zhou
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jia SZ, Xiang Y, Yang JJ, Shi JH, Jia CW, Leng JH. Oncofertility outcomes after fertility-sparing treatment of bilateral serous borderline ovarian tumors: results of a large retrospective study. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:328-339. [PMID: 32048711 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the oncofertility outcomes of young women (≤40 years old) with bilateral serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) after fertility-sparing surgery? SUMMARY ANSWER Fertility preservation with the bilateral ovarian cystectomy procedure is feasible for bilateral SBOTs, with an acceptable oncological outcome and worthwhile pregnancy rates. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Fertility-sparing approaches are becoming the standard management of young patients with unilateral SBOTs and other borderline histological subtypes. However, there is a paucity of evidence to dictate the best management in bilateral SBOTs. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a retrospective observational study performed at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing, China, between January 1999 and January 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ninety-four women (≤40 years old) with pathologically confirmed bilateral SBOTs were included. Following preoperative counseling, patients self-selected into one of three treatment modalities: bilateral ovarian cystectomy (n = 48), unilateral adnexectomy plus contralateral cystectomy (UAC; n = 31), and radical surgery (n = 15). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the clinical and pathological features associated with disease-free survival and reproductive outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE During the median follow-up of 64 months (range, 4-243 months), 61 patients (65%) developed relapse, including 3 (20%) in the radical group, 26 (84%) in the UAC group and 32 (67%) in the bilateral cystectomy group. In the multivariate analyses, preoperative CA-125>300 U/mL, fertility preservation and micropapillary pattern were independently associated with adverse disease-free survival (P = 0.001, 0.03 and 0.026, respectively). Fourteen patients (15%) experienced invasive recurrence, and three (3%) died of progressive disease. The micropapillary pattern was significantly associated with invasive evolution risk (P = 0.006). Of the 49 patients who attempted to conceive, 23 (47%) achieved 27 pregnancies (24 spontaneous and three after IVF-ET), resulting in 19 live births. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.13) or pregnancy rate (41 vs. 50%, P = 0.56) between the UAC and bilateral procedures. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION As a retrospective study conducted in a referral center, inherent biases exist. The nonrandom allocation to treatment groups and relatively small number of patients attempt to conceive might limit the statistical power of our findings. Only 41 patients (43.6%) received complete staging during their initial surgeries, so an underestimation bias in terms of the FIGO stage and extraovarian implants might have occurred. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The ultraconservative bilateral ovarian cystectomy procedure should be proposed in bilateral SBOTs when technically feasible. Invasive evolution occurs frequently in these women, and intense follow-up and oncofertility counseling are warranted, especially for those with micropapillary patterns. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang-Zheng Jia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yang Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jun-Jun Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jing-Hua Shi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Cong-Wei Jia
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jin-Hua Leng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lecointre L, Bund V, Sangnier E, Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Koskas M, Bolze PA, Collinet P, Canlorbe G, Touboul C, Huchon C, Coutant C, Faller E, Boisramé T, Gantzer J, Demarchi M, Lavoué V, Akladios C. Status of Surgical Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors in France: are Recommendations Being Followed? Multicentric French Study by the FRANCOGYN Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7616-7623. [PMID: 33904003 PMCID: PMC8521578 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09852-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are tumors with a favorable prognosis but whose management by consensus is essential to limit the risk of invasive recurrence. This study aimed to conduct an inventory of surgical practices for BOT in France and to evaluate the conformity of the treatment according to the current French guidelines. Methods This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included nine referral centers of France between January 2001 and December 2018. It analyzed all patients with serous and mucinous BOT who had undergone surgery. A peritoneal staging in accordance with the recommendations was defined by performance of a peritoneal cytology, an omentectomy, and at least one peritoneal biopsy. Results The study included 332 patients. A laparoscopy was performed in 79.5% of the cases. Treatment was conservative in 31.9% of the cases. The recurrence rate was significantly increased after conservative treatment (17.3% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Peritoneal cytology was performed for 95.5%, omentectomy for 83.1%, and at least one biopsy for 82.2% of the patients. The overall recurrence rate was 7.8%, and the recurrence was invasive in 1.2% of the cases. No link was found between the recurrence rate and the conformity of peritoneal staging. The overall rate of staging noncompliance was 22.9%. Conclusion The current standards for BOT management seem to be well applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,I-Cube UMR 7357-Laboratoire des Sciences de L'ingénieur, de L'informatique et de L'imagerie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Virginie Bund
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 1109, Institut thématique interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Transplantex NG, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Eva Sangnier
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Reims, Reims, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, Hôpital Jeanne De Flandre, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Hôpital la Pitié Salpétrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy, Poissy, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Emilie Faller
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Boisramé
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Justine Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Martin Demarchi
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Chérif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang P, Fang L. Salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a systemic review and meta-analysis on postoperative recurrence and fertility. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:132. [PMID: 33882931 PMCID: PMC8061226 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02241-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the postoperative recurrence and fertility in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) who underwent different surgical procedures: salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy. METHODS Potentially relevant literature from inception to Nov. 06, 2020, were retrieved in databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (Pubmed). We applied the keywords "fertility-sparing surgery," or "conservative surgery," or "cystectomy," or "salpingo-oophorectomy," or "oophorectomy," or "adnexectomy," or "borderline ovarian tumor" for literate searching. Systemic reviews and meta-analyses were performed on the postoperative recurrence rates and pregnancy rates between patients receiving the two different surgical methods. Begger's methods, Egger's methods, and funnel plot were used to evaluate the publication bias. RESULT Among the sixteen eligible studies, the risk of recurrence was evaluated in all studies, and eight studies assessed the postoperative pregnancy rates in the BOT patients. A total of 1839 cases with borderline ovarian tumors were included, in which 697 patients (37.9%) received unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 1142 patients (62.1%) underwent unilateral/bilateral cystectomy. Meta-analyses showed that BOT patients with unilateral/bilateral cystectomy had significantly higher recurrence risk (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.59-2.57) compared with those receiving unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pooled analysis of four studies further confirmed the higher risk of recurrence in patients with cystectomy (HR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.11-3.58). In addition, no significant difference in postoperative pregnancy rate was found between patients with the two different surgical procedures (OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.60-1.42). CONCLUSION Compared with the unilateral/bilateral cystectomy, the unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with BOT, and it does not reduce the pregnancy of patients after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021238177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Wang
- Beijing Obstertrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 251 Yao Jiayuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China.
| | - Lei Fang
- Beijing Obstertrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 251 Yao Jiayuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chelariu-Raicu A, Cobb LP, Gershenson DM. Fertility preservation in rare ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:432-441. [PMID: 33649010 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Although gynecologic cancers usually affect older women, a significant proportion of patients with rare ovarian tumors are of reproductive age. In a young patient who presents with a pelvic mass, a primary consideration should be the probability of a malignancy. If there is any suspicion of a cancer diagnosis, the patient should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist. Key factors in clinical management include assessment of preoperative studies (physical examination, tumor markers, and imaging) to determine the likelihood of a malignancy, appropriate preoperative counseling (including discussion of fertility preservation), choice of surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open), frozen section examination by a gynecologic pathologist, and intraoperative decision making. Fortunately, the clinical features of several rare ovarian tumors are compatible with fertility preservation. These characteristics include a high proportion of stage I disease and unilateral ovarian involvement for most rare histotypes. Once a final diagnosis of a rare ovarian tumor is determined, further clinical management may include the need for further studies, possible referral to a fertility expert, consideration of further surgery (if the initial surgery was incomplete), and recommendations for postoperative therapy. This article reviews the literature on fertility preservation in the context of the treatment of several rare ovarian tumor subtypes, including malignant germ cell tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, borderline tumors, low grade serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lauren P Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zilliox M, Lecointre L, Azais H, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Bourdel N, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Carcopino X, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Coutant C, Dabi Y, Dion L, Gauthier T, Graesslin O, Huchon C, Koskas M, Lavoue V, Mezzadri M, Mimoun C, Ouldamer L, Raimond E, Touboul C, Lapointe M, Akladios C. Management of borderline ovarian tumours during pregnancy: Results of a French multi-centre study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:412-418. [PMID: 33296755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) detected during pregnancy, and to establish an inventory of French practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective multi-centre case study of 14 patients treated for BOTs, diagnosed during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017, in five French pelvic cancerology expert centres, including data on clinical characteristics, histological tumour characteristics, surgical procedure, adjuvant treatments, follow-up and fertility. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 29.3 [standard deviation (SD) 6.2] years. Most BOTs were diagnosed on ultrasonography in the first trimester (85.7 %), and most of these cases (78.5 %) also underwent magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis (true positives 54.5 %). Most patients underwent surgery during pregnancy (57 %), with complete staging surgery in two cases (14.3 %). Laparoscopy was performed more frequently than other procedures (50 %), and unilateral adnexectomy was more common than cystectomy (57.5 %). Tumour size influenced the surgical approach significantly (mean size 7.5 cm for laparoscopy, 11.9 cm for laparoconversion, 14 cm for primary laparotomy; P = 0.08), but the type of resection did not. Most patients were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (92.8 %) tumours, but many were upstaged after complete restaging surgery (57.1 %). Most BOTs were serous (50 %), two cases had a micropapillary component (28.5 %), and one case had a micro-invasive implant. BOTs were bilateral in two cases (14.2 %). Mean follow-up was 31.4 (SD 14.8) months. Recurrent lesions occurred in two patients (14.2 %) and no deaths have been recorded to date among the study population. CONCLUSION BOTs remain rare, but this study - despite its small sample size - supports the hypothesis that BOTs during pregnancy have potentially aggressive characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zilliox
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France.
| | - L Lecointre
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France; I-Cube UMR 7357 Science Laboratory, Strasbourg, France; IHU: Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - H Azais
- Department of Gynaecology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Ballester
- Department of Gynaecology, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P A Bolze
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital South Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - N Bourdel
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - A Bricou
- Department of Gynaecology, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- Department of Gynaecology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - X Carcopino
- Department of Gynaecology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - P Collinet
- Department of Gynaecology, Jeanne de Flandres Hospital, Lille, France
| | - C Coutant
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Dijon, France
| | - Y Dabi
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Dion
- Department of Gynaecology, University South Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - C Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology, Intercommunal Hospital of Poissy, Poissy, France
| | - M Koskas
- Department of Gynaecology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V Lavoue
- Department of Gynaecology, University South Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - M Mezzadri
- Department of Gynaecology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - C Mimoun
- Department of Gynaecology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - E Raimond
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - C Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Lapointe
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sangnier E, Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Huchon C, Collinet P, Bricou A, Mimoun C, Lecointre L, Graesslin O, Raimond E. Risk factors for recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors in France: A multicenter retrospective study by the FRANCOGYN group. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 50:101961. [PMID: 33127559 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) although rare, have shown an increase in the incidence worldwide. Although the survival rate is high, the recurrence rate is estimated to be between 5% and 34%. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrence of BOTs. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study included 493 patients treated surgically for BOT between January 2001 and December 2018. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients showed recurrence (group R, 7.5%), while 456 did not (group NR, 92.5%). With an average follow-up of 30.5 months (1-276), the overall recurrence rate was 7.5%. Recurrence rates for the BOT and invasive types were 5.7% (n = 28) and 1.4% (n = 7), respectively. The mean time to recurrence was 44.1 (3-251) months. Univariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, type of surgical procedure, histological type, and FIGO stage were factors influencing recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors for recurrence of BOT were conservative treatment (OR = 7 [95% CI 3.01-16.23]; p < 0.05) and advanced FIGO stage (OR = 5.86 [95% CI 2.21-15.5]; p < 0.05). DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, this multicenter study was one of the largest studies on the risk factors for BOT recurrence. Conservative treatment and advanced FIGO stage were identified as risk factors for BOT recurrence. These results reinforce the need for restaging of patients who did not have an optimal initial surgical staging so as not to avoid missing a tumor in the advanced stage. Referral to a surgical oncology center is suggested to optimize overall patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Sangnier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes university, Reims, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional University Hospital Center of Tours, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France; INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - C Huchon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy, Poissy, France
| | - P Collinet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional University Hospital Center of Lille, Lille, France
| | - A Bricou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jean Verdier Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - C Mimoun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lariboisière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Paris 7, Paris, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Center, Strasbourg, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes university, Reims, France
| | - E Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes university, Reims, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fertility and prognosis of borderline ovarian tumor after conservative management: Results of the multicentric OPTIBOT study by the GINECO & TMRG group. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:29-35. [PMID: 32241341 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Description of fertility and prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) treated by fertility-sparing surgery through a longitudinal study from the French national cancer network. METHODS All consecutive patients diagnosed with BOT from the French National Network dedicated to Ovarian Malignant Rare Tumors from 2010 and 2017 were selected. In 2018, an update was made by sending a questionnaire regarding recurrence and fertility to patients aged under 43 years at diagnosis and treated conservatively. We compared the characteristics of the patients with/without recurrence and with/without live birth. RESULTS Fifty-two patients aged 18 to 42 years presented a desire of pregnancy. Thirty patients (58%) presented a FIGO IA tumor, and 20 patients were treated by bilateral cystectomies (38%). We observed at least one live birth for 33 patients (63%) and local recurrences in 20 patients (38%). Both recurrence and live birth in 17 patients (33%) were reported, with recurrence occurring before pregnancy, after a second fertility-sparing treatment, in half of the cases. No factors associated with recurrence or live birth in this study were identified. Moreover, in this population, both recurrence and live birth were independent of age, with a linear risk along time. Disease-free survival was worse for patients treated with bilateral cystectomy (n = 20, 38%), with no difference in terms of fertility. CONCLUSION Two third of the patients experienced life birth after conservation surgery. We did not highlight an age/time from surgery for which the risk of recurrence outweighs the chance of pregnancy and to radicalize surgery. Moreover, almost a quarter of the live birth occurred after recurrence, with no more further event to date in these patients. The results encourage to consider a second fertility-sparing surgery after local borderline recurrence in the case of pregnancy desire. All these decisions must be discussed in specialized multidisciplinary boards.
Collapse
|
18
|
Verta S, Kipp B. Ultraconservative, Fertility Sparing Treatment of Bilateral Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Case Report of a 26-Year-Old, 0-Gravida with an Endometrioid Borderline Ovarian Tumor of the Right Ovary and a Sero-Mucinous Borderline Ovarian Tumor of the Left Ovary and a Review of the Literature. Int J Womens Health 2020; 12:601-611. [PMID: 32821173 PMCID: PMC7418455 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s258478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors are rare, entailing a lack of data on their natural history as well as the safety of conservative and ultraconservative surgical management, especially in cases with bilateral borderline ovarian tumors including one of endometrioid differentiation. Therefore, we present such a case and provide a review of the literature on endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors. We report the case of a 26-year-old, 0-gravida with an endometrioid borderline ovarian tumor of the right and a sero-mucinous borderline ovarian tumor of the left ovary treated by fertility sparing, ultraconservative surgery with bilateral cystectomy, completed by staging procedures including omentectomy and peritoneal sampling, as well as endometrial sampling by means of curettage. Reviewing the literature and taking into account the course of our case, we propose the feasibility of an ultraconservative management, including endometrial sampling, in young patients with bilateral borderline ovarian tumors including one of endometrioid differentiation who desire to preserve fertility, followed by a closely monitored follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Verta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li N, Ming X, Li Z. Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302:1063-1074. [PMID: 32748055 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05716-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical procedures, histological subtypes, and surgical approaches are involved in the recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs), but whether those three factors affect relapse remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the effects of surgical procedures, histological subtypes, and surgical approaches on the relapse and pregnancy rates of BOT after fertility-preserving surgery (FPS) according to the patients' characteristics. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library was conducted from their inception to November 2018. Studies that investigated the impact of surgical procedures, histological subtypes, and surgical approaches on the relapse and pregnancy rates in patients with BOT after FPS were eligible. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS Thirty-five studies involving a total of 2921 patients with BOT after FPS were included. The pooled ORs indicated that the risk of relapse was significantly increased in patients who underwent unilateral cystectomy or with serous BOT. There was no significant difference between laparoscopy and laparotomy on the risk of relapse. Surgical procedures, histological subtypes, and surgical approaches did not influence pregnancy rates. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent unilateral cystectomy or with serous BOT presented an excess risk of relapse after FPS, but the surgical approach did not affect the risk of relapse. The pregnancy rate is not affected by surgical procedures, histological subtypes, and surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiu Ming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Poulain M, Vandame J, Tran C, Koutchinsky S, Pirtea P, Ayoubi JM. Fertility preservation in borderline ovarian tumor patients and survivors. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020; 43:179-186. [PMID: 32628631 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2019-0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent around 15% of all epithelial ovarian cancer. Around one third of those patients is under 40 and has not completed childbearing when the tumor is diagnosed. Cancer survivors are more and more concerned about their future fertility since a large proportion of those with BOTs are young. Whatever the tumor stage, information regarding future fertility after treatment and fertility preservation (FP) options must be delivered to all patients before treatment. A multidisciplinary team will discuss and propose personalized treatment and FP strategies. Nowadays, the FP options offered to patients with BOT are the followings: i) minimal invasive conservative surgery, ii) oocyte cryopreservation after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in vitro maturation (IVM) and iii) ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Generally, the most common strategy to preserve future fertility is represented by minimal invasive conservative surgery. However, with the remarkable success and evolution of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) - notably progress and efficiency in COS and oocyte vitrification - have led to offer another potential approach for FP consisting in oocyte cryopreservation. Several COS protocols, such as random start or dual stimulation associating tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins provide similar results when compared to standard protocols while providing safety by minimizing the risk of high estrogen exposure. When COS is contraindicated, oocyte cryopreservation can still be possible throw IVM. Even though, oocyte competence after IVM is lower than that obtained after COS. A less used approach is cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, consisting in freezing ovarian cortex fragments for a future thawing and graft. Some concerns and limitations regard the ovarian cortex graft and the risk of reintroducing malignant cells once performed. Nonetheless, the latter it is the only option in prepubertal patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Poulain
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France - ENVA, BREED, 94700, Maison-Alfort, France
| | - Jessica Vandame
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
| | - Chloé Tran
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
| | - Sonia Koutchinsky
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
| | - Paul Pirtea
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France - ENVA, BREED, 94700, Maison-Alfort, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ayoubi
- FOCH Hospital, Gynecology Obstetric and Reproductive Medical Unit Department, Suresnes, France
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France - ENVA, BREED, 94700, Maison-Alfort, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Plett H, Ricciardi E, Harter P, Ataseven B, Heitz F, Prader S, Schneider S, Heikaus S, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Kommoss F, Lax SF, Staebler A, Traut A, du Bois A. Dataset on patients with Recurrent Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Table with Review of Literature on Fertility and Oncologic Outcomes of patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumors. Data Brief 2020; 30:105653. [PMID: 32395597 PMCID: PMC7206201 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The data presented here is related to the research article entitled "FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY AND REPRODUCTIVE-OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS" by Plett et al. in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology [1] and is analysed and discussed in detail. 18 Patients with Recurrent Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOT) were identified and listed in Table 1. All patients underwent treatment for primary BOT either per radical surgery (RS) or fertility sparing surgery (FSS) by the same team in Horst Schmidt Klinik (HSK) in Wiesbaden and the Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology at Kliniken Essen-Mitte between January 2000 and December 2018 and were followed up closely. Details on patients` and surgical characteristics are given as well as management of character of recurrent disease. In Table 2 important publications from the last 20 years are listed in order to visualize better the oncologic outcomes (invasive and non-invasive relapses) and calculated risks of recurrence with the purpose to understand better the important findings of the related article cited above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Plett
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Enzo Ricciardi
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonia Prader
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, Medizin Campus Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Sigurd F. Lax
- Department of Pathology, LKH Graz II, Graz and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Candotti G, Peiretti M, Mangili G, Bergamini A, Candiani M, Cioffi R, Mais V, Rabaiotti E, Bocciolone L. What women want: Fertility sparing surgery in Borderline ovarian tumours patients and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:888-892. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
23
|
Plett H, Harter P, Ataseven B, Heitz F, Prader S, Schneider S, Heikaus S, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Kommoss F, Lax SF, Staebler A, Traut A, du Bois A. Fertility-sparing surgery and reproductive-outcomes in patients with borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:411-417. [PMID: 32115229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are considered a biological category with increased epithelial proliferation and cellular atypia in the absence of invasive growth. Since BOT occur often in young patients fertility sparing surgery (FSS) is an important issue. With this study we aimed to evaluate risk factors for relapses and fertility of patients after FSS. METHODS Patients diagnosed with BOT and treated between 2000 and 2018 were included. External pathological review was done in all patients. FSS was performed after individual discussion and a complete surgical staging according to FIGO, without lymphadenectomy and with a waiver for preservation of uterus and one ovary. RESULTS Among 352 Patients 80.2% had FIGO I and 63.9% had a serous BOT. Eighteen patients (5.1%) relapsed and 4 cases of malignant transformation were reported (1.1%). One patient of the latter died, all others have no evidence of disease. The overall recurrence-rate was 1.1% in FIGO-Stage I and 25.5% in FIGO III-IV (HR = 27; 95%-CI 7.7-95; p ≤.001). 95 patients underwent FSS. Thirteen (13.7%) of these patients relapsed, all as BOT. In multivariate analysis FIGO stages II-IV (HR = 27; 95%-CI: 8.1-102; p ≤.001) and FSS (HR = 12; 95%-CI: 2.9-47; p = .001) remained significant risk factors for recurrent disease. Pregnancy rate among forty-one patients attempting to conceive was 82.9%. 29 patients experienced at least one life-birth, in total 38 life-births were reported. CONCLUSION FSS in stage I is a safe procedure and life-birth-rates after FSS are high. More advanced FIGO stages have to be discussed individually and relapse rates have to be weighed against FSS. A central review of pathology, as we performed routinely, is mandatory and may have contributed to our low rate of invasive relapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Plett
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonia Prader
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, Medizin Campus Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, LKH Graz II, Graz and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Margueritte F, Sallee C, Lacorre A, Gauroy E, Larouzee E, Chereau E, De La Motte Rouge T, Koskas M, Gauthier T. [Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Relapse, Follow-up and Interest of a Completion Surgery]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:248-259. [PMID: 32004784 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide clinical practice guidelines from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF) based on the best evidence available, concerning epidemiology of recurrence, the risk or relapse and the follow-up in case of borderline ovarian tumor after primary management, and evaluation of completion surgery after fertility sparing surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS English and French review of literature from 2000 to 2019 based on publications from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, with keywords borderline ovarian tumor, low malignant potential, recurrence, relapse, follow-up, completion surgery. From 2000 up to this day, 448 references have been found, from which only 175 were screened for this work. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Overall risk of recurrence with Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT) may vary from 2 to 24% with a 10-years overall survival>94% and risk of invasive recurrence between 0.5 to 3.8%. Age<40 years (level of evidence 3), advanced initial FIGO stage (LE3), fertility sparing surgery (LE2), residual disease after initial surgery for serous BOT (LE2), implants (invasive or not) (LE2) are risk factors of recurrence. In case of conservative treatment, serous BOT had a higher risk of relapse than mucinous BOT (LE2). Lymphatic involvement (LE3) and use of mini invasive surgery (LE2) are not associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Scores or Nomograms could be useful to assess the risk of recurrence and then to inform patients about this risk (gradeC). In case of serous BOT, completion surgery is not recommended, after conservative treatment and fulfillment of parental project (grade B). It isn't possible to suggest a recommendation about completion surgery for mucinous BOT. There is not any data to advise a frequency of follow-up and use of paraclinic tools in general case of BOT. Follow-up of treated BOT must be achieved beyond 5 years (grade B). A systematic clinical examination is recommended during follow-up (grade B), after treatment of BOT. In case of elevation of CA-125 at diagnosis use of CA-125 serum level is recommended during follow-up of treated BOT (grade B). When a conservative treatment (preservation of ovarian pieces and uterus) of BOT is performed, endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (grade B). There isn't any sufficient data to advise a frequency of these examinations (clinical examination, ultrasound and CA-125) in case of treated BOT. CONCLUSION Risk of relapse after surgical treatment of BOT depends on patients' characteristics, type of BOT (histological features) and modalities of initial treatment. Scores and nomogram are useful tools to assess risk of relapse. Follow-up must be performed beyond 5 years and in case of peculiar situations, use of paraclinic evaluations is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Margueritte
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Limoges, hôpital mère-enfant, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - C Sallee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Limoges, hôpital mère-enfant, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - A Lacorre
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Limoges, hôpital mère-enfant, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - E Gauroy
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bichat, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France
| | - E Larouzee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bichat, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 75000 Paris, France
| | - E Chereau
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Saint-Joseph, 26, boulevard de Louvain, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - T De La Motte Rouge
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - M Koskas
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bichat, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 75000 Paris, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Limoges, hôpital mère-enfant, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges, France; UMR-1248, faculté de médecine, 87000 Limoges, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Colombo N, Sessa C, Bois AD, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Baert T, Belaroussi I, Dashora A, Olbrecht S, Planchamp F, Querleu D. ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:ijgc-2019-000308. [PMID: 31048403 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of guidelines is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on April 12-14, 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Colombo
- Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - C Sessa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - J Ledermann
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Pignata
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Uro-Gynaecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - I Belaroussi
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - A Dashora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK
| | - S Olbrecht
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Planchamp
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Baert T, Belaroussi I, Dashora A, Olbrecht S, Planchamp F, Querleu D. ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:672-705. [PMID: 31046081 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 591] [Impact Index Per Article: 118.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of guidelines recommendations is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on 12-14 April 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Colombo
- Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - C Sessa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - J Ledermann
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast
| | - I McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Pignata
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Uro-Gynaecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - I Belaroussi
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - A Dashora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK
| | - S Olbrecht
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Oncologic and fertility impact of surgical approach for borderline ovarian tumours treated with fertility sparing surgery. Eur J Cancer 2019; 111:61-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
28
|
Short-term Outcomes and Pregnancy Rate After Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Single-Institute Experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 28:274-278. [PMID: 29324543 PMCID: PMC5794247 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We investigated the short-term outcomes and pregnancy rate after a laparoscopic approach to fertility preservation in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). Methods Clinic-pathologic variants of patients with BOTs who underwent conservative surgery at the Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 2009 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Among 211 patients with BOTs, 74 (35.1%) received conservative surgery (44 cases using a laparoscopic approach and 30 cases using a laparotomy approach). The mean age of the laparotomy group was significantly younger than that of the laparoscopic group (P = 0.024). The maximal longitude of the tumor in the laparotomy group was significantly longer than that in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The number of incomplete surgery cases in the laparoscopic group was significantly greater than that in the laparotomy group (P < 0.001). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in gravidity and parity before surgery, abnormality of serum tumor makers, tumor lateralities, ascites, histology, duration of follow-up, pregnancy rate after surgery, or postoperative recurrence. Total recurrent rate was 6.7% (5/74). Two cases in laparotomy group and 3 cases in laparoscopic group relapsed respectively. There was no significant difference of recurrent rate between the 2 groups. The total pregnant rate was 33.8% (25/74). Nine patients (30%) in the laparotomy group and 16 patients (36.4%) in the laparoscopic group became pregnant during follow-up respectively. There were no significant differences in the postoperative durations of pregnancy, pregnancy type, age at pregnancy, tumor lateralities, ascites, or type of pathology between 2 groups. The pregnancy rate of incomplete surgery cases in laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that of laparotomy group (P = 0.011). No recurrence occurred among the pregnant cases. Conclusions A comprehensive laparoscopic surgery was not performed in incomplete surgery patients undergoing complete exploration. Good short-term outcomes and pregnancy were observed in patients receiving conservative laparoscopic surgery for BOTs, especially in patients receiving incomplete conservative laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
|
29
|
Tomao F, Di Pinto A, Sassu CM, Bardhi E, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Petrella MC, Peccatori FA, Panici PB. Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours. Ecancermedicalscience 2018; 12:885. [PMID: 30679952 PMCID: PMC6345054 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A considerable number of patients with a cancer diagnosis are of childbearing age and have not satisfied their desire for a family. Despite ovarian cancer (OC) usually occurring in older patients, 3%-14% are diagnosed at a fertile age with the overall 5-year survival rate being 91.2% in women ≤44 years of age when it is found at 1A-B stage. In this scenario, testing the safety and the efficacy of fertility sparing strategies in OC patients is very important overall in terms of quality of life. Unfortunately, the lack of randomised trials to validate conservative approaches does not guarantee the safety of fertility preservation strategies. However, evidence-based data from descriptive series suggest that in selected cases, the preservation of the uterus and at least one part of the ovary does not lead to a high risk of relapse. This conservative surgery helps to maintain organ function, giving patients of childbearing age the possibility to preserve their fertility. We hereby analysed the main evidence from the international literature on this topic in order to highlight the selected criteria for conservative management of OC patients, including healthy BRCA mutations carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Pinto
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Maria Sassu
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Erlisa Bardhi
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jia SZ, Zhang JJ, Liang ZY, Yang JJ, Xiang Y, Jia CW, Leng JH. Safety and fertility outcomes after the conservative treatment of endometrioid borderline ovarian tumours. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1160. [PMID: 30470202 PMCID: PMC6251198 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5091-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Because of the rarity of endometrioid borderline ovarian tumours (EBOTs), there is a paucity of data concerning the natural history and prognosis of this condition. Thus, the objective of our study was to establish the feasibility of fertility preservation in young women with EBOTs, as well as their oncological and reproductive outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients with EBOTs, treated at a tertiary referral centre during a span of 22 years, were retrospectively analysed. Recurrence-free interval, as well as its association with the type of surgery and with other clinical and pathological features, was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Results Of the 59 patients studied, the median follow-up time was 30 months (range, 6–177 months). Nine (15.3%) patients developed 13 recurrences 6–137 months after the initial surgeries, including three patients (5.1%; n = 3/59) who developed six invasive recurrences 8, 18 and 68 months after their initial surgeries. Conservative surgery showed a tendency towards a high recurrence rate (17.2% versus 13.3%); however, this difference was not significant (p = 0.45). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the oophorectomy group than in the cystectomy group (p = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that none of the variables assessed were associated with an increased hazard ratio for recurrence, except for a younger age at diagnosis (p = 0.021). Of 20 patients who attempted to conceive, three pregnancies among two patients (10.0%) resulted in two live births. Conclusions Conservative surgery with unilateral adnexectomy can be proposed for young women with EBOTs with fertility desire; however, the reproductive result is not satisfactory. In addition, careful evaluations of the endometria should be offered during the initial surgery and follow-up period. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang-Zheng Jia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Ji Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Yong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Jun Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Cong-Wei Jia
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Hua Leng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fang C, Zhao L, Chen X, Yu A, Xia L, Zhang P. The impact of clinicopathologic and surgical factors on relapse and pregnancy in young patients (≤40 years old) with borderline ovarian tumors. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1147. [PMID: 30463533 PMCID: PMC6249857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4932-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility sparing surgery has been extensively performed among patients with borderline ovarian tumors due to their age and favorable prognosis. Nevertheless, the prognosis and obstetric outcomes in these patients remain uncertain. Thus, the current study was carried out to evaluate the oncological safety and fertility benefits of different fertility sparing surgery subtypes and various clinicopathological parameters. METHODS Young borderline ovarian tumor patients with an age of ≤40 years, who were admitted and treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 1996 to December 2016, were enrolled in this study and reviewed retrospectively. The prognostic and obstetric effects of clinicopathological and surgical variables were evaluated using univariate/multivariate analyses and survival curves. RESULTS A total of 92 eligible patients were enrolled in the analysis. Among these patients, 22 (24%) patients showed recurrence after a median follow-up of 46.5 months. Within the fertility sparing surgery group, patients at advanced stage (≥stage II), of serous type, with micropapillary and bilateral tumors were associated with a higher recurrence rate and a shorter recurrence interval. In terms of different modalities of fertility sparing surgery, adnexectomy was remarkably favored over cystectomy-including (P = 0.012); unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had better prognosis than cystectomy and bilateral cystectomy was favored over unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy+contralateral cystectomy. Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (≥Stage II), the presence of bilateral and micropapillary lesions, and the application of cystectomy-including surgery were correlated with poorer disease-free survival, while the mucinous type of borderline ovarian tumors was related to improved disease-free survival. In this study, a total of 22 patients attempted to conceive and 15 (68%) of these patients achieved successful pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral cystectomy should be recommended as the preferred choice of treatment for young patients with unilateral and bilateral borderline ovarian tumor who desire to preserve fertility. In addition, borderline ovarian tumor patients at advanced stage (≥stage II), of serous type, with micropapillary and bilateral tumors should pay more attention to the risk of recurrence. Therefore, these patients should choose fertility sparing surgery carefully and attempt to achieve pregnancy as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyan Fang
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lingqin Zhao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Aijun Yu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Liang Xia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prognostic Factors for Recurrence After Fertility-Preserving Surgery in Patients With Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:1833-1841. [PMID: 28816706 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to find the unfavorable prognostic factors for recurrence after fertility-preserving surgery (FPS) in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). METHODS To perform a meta-analysis to compare the recurrence rates of BOT patients after FPS according to different prognostic factors, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for observational studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a fixed-effects model. RESULTS We analyzed 32 studies that included 2691 BOT patients who underwent FPS, 383 patients of whom had a relapse in the follow-up. In meta-analysis, risks associated with recurrence in patients with unilateral cystectomy (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.86-3.33) or serous borderline ovarian tumors (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.97-5.02) were significantly increased, and there was no significantly increased OR for patients with laparoscopy compared with those with laparotomy (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.60). CONCLUSIONS Unilateral cystectomy (19.4%) and serous BOTs (19.2%) are significantly associated with higher recurrence rates, and no negative impact of laparoscopy on recurrence can be demonstrated when compared with laparotomy in the meta-analysis.
Collapse
|
33
|
Malpica A, Longacre TA. Prognostic indicators in ovarian serous borderline tumours. Pathology 2018; 50:205-213. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
34
|
The Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated With Relapse and Recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumors With Long-Term Follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 26:1053-61. [PMID: 27177283 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal was to analyze the risk factors of relapse and to compare the type of recurrence in patients with borderline tumors treated and followed up in Oncologic Center in Warsaw. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective-prospective cohort study of 307 patients with confirmed borderline ovarian tumors treated in the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center in Warsaw between 1994 and 2010. Univariate and multivariate analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to explore the impact of different covariates on progression-free survival. The analysis included the following potential prognostic factors: age, CA 125 value, stage according to classification of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), methods and radicality of operation, staging, tumor capsule rupture, histopathology, implants, ascites, and microinvasion. The analysis of relapses was also performed. RESULTS Univariate analysis showed the negative impact of 2 factors on progression-free survival: FIGO II/III (implants) (P = 0.011) and ascites (P = 0.027). The multivariate analyses showed the detrimental effect of FIGO Ic (HR, 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-6.17, P = 0.027), FIGO II or III (implants) (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.56-8.61, P = 0.003), and incomplete staging (HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.09-12.07, P = 0.035), but not ascites (P > 0.1). Relapse occurred in 32 (10%) patients: in 22 patients as borderline and in 10 patients as invasive tumor. Seven (70%) patients with invasive relapse died of disease. All patients with borderline relapses were successfully managed by second surgery, which in 80% was again conservative. CONCLUSIONS Relapses in borderline ovarian tumor are uncommon, in 10% of patients. Invasive relapses are rare, only in 3% of patients, but often with fatal course irrespective of the treatment applied. The most important clinical risk factors of relapse are implants (FIGO II/III), FIGO Ic, and incomplete staging and this patients as well as patients with ascites should be closely followed. Relapses of borderline histology are easily detected and successfully managed by surgery.
Collapse
|
35
|
McEvoy SH, Nougaret S, Abu-Rustum NR, Vargas HA, Sadowski EA, Menias CO, Shitano F, Fujii S, Sosa RE, Escalon JG, Sala E, Lakhman Y. Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:2488-2512. [PMID: 28528388 PMCID: PMC5857967 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Historically, cancer treatment has emphasized measures for the "cure" regardless of the long-term consequences. Advances in cancer detection and treatment have resulted in improved outcomes bringing to the fore various quality of life considerations including future fertility. For many young cancer patients, fertility preservation is now an integral component of clinical decision-making and treatment design. Optimal fertility-sparing options for young patients with gynecologic cancer are influenced by patient age, primary cancer, treatment regimens, and patient preferences. Possible approaches include embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian transposition, conservative surgery, and conservative medical treatment to delay radical surgery. These may be used alone or in combination to maximize fertility preservation. Awareness of the various fertility-sparing options, eligibility criteria, and the central role of magnetic resonance imaging in the proper selection of patients will enable radiologists to produce complete clinically relevant imaging reports and serve as effective consultants to referring clinicians. Knowledge of the potential imaging pitfalls is essential to avoid misinterpretation and guide appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead H McEvoy
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation, 550 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM, U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecologic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Fuki Shitano
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Fujii
- Division of Radiology, Department of Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
| | - Ramon E Sosa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joanna G Escalon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Helpman L, Yaniv A, Beiner ME, Aviel-Ronen S, Perri T, Ben-Baruch G, Hogen Ben-David L, Jakobson-Setton A, Korach J. Fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian tumors - how does it impact disease outcome? A cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96:1300-1306. [PMID: 28815550 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Borderline ovarian tumors are typically indolent neoplasms. Since many are diagnosed in younger women, fertility conservation is an important consideration and has been advocated based on retrospective data. The objective of this study was to identify features impacting on recurrence and survival in a series of borderline ovarian tumors, and to assess the safety of a fertility-sparing approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A historical cohort study of consecutive borderline ovarian tumors cases treated at a single institution over 30 years (1981-2011). Data on surgical approach (fertility-sparing or otherwise), disease stage, CA125 levels, histological features, adjuvant treatment and follow-up data were collected. Recurrence and survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and associations with the variables of interest were evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS 213 patients were included. Of 132 women age 40 years and below at diagnosis, 112 (85%) had a fertility-sparing procedure and 60 (46%) had conservation of an involved ovary. Fifty patients (24%) developed recurrences; fertility preservation (hazard ratio = 2.57; 95% confidence interval 1.1-6; p = 0.029) and advanced stage (hazard ratio = 4.15; 95% confidence interval 2.3-7.6; p < 0.001) were independently associated with recurrence on multivariate analysis. Eleven (5%) patients died of their disease. Fertility preservation was not associated with compromised survival. CONCLUSIONS Borderline ovarian tumors carry a good prognosis overall. Fertility preservation is associated with a higher risk of disease relapse; however, as most relapses are localized and may be salvaged with surgical treatment, overall survival is not compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limor Helpman
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Assaf Yaniv
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mario E Beiner
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sarit Aviel-Ronen
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamar Perri
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gilad Ben-Baruch
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Jacob Korach
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ratanasrithong P, Benjapibal M. Pregnancy Outcomes after Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Ovarian Neoplasms. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:2083-2087. [PMID: 28843226 PMCID: PMC5697464 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.8.2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective, single institute study aimed to evaluate pregnancy and oncologic outcomes in reproductive-age Thai women with early-stage ovarian neoplasms undergoing conservative surgical treatment. Methods: Medical records of 84 women of reproductive age (15-45 years) with histologically confirmed early-stage (IA-IIC) borderline ovarian tumors or cancers who had undergone conservative surgery between January 2003 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 28.0 years (SD 7.2). Histologically, 30 (35.7%) had borderline ovarian tumors, 28 (33.3%) epithelial cancers, 22 (26.2%) malignant germ cell tumors, and 4 (4.8%) sex cord stromal tumors. Thirty-five women (41.7%) had complete surgical staging performed, whereas 49 (58.3%) underwent an incomplete staging procedure. Thirty-four patients (40.5%) received postoperative chemotherapy. Among 29 patients subsequently attempting pregnancy, 15 conceived successfully (51.7%). Pregnancy outcomes were one spontaneous abortion and 14 viable births. There were no serious adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes among women with documented live births and no reported fetal abnormalities. Pregnancy rates were not impacted by surgical staging (53.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.837) or adjuvant chemotherapy (55.6% vs 50.0%, p=0.782). The 5-year disease-free survival was 91.0% and pregnancy after conservative surgery did not affect progression-free survival (p=0.194). Conclusion: Conservative surgery with or without appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy can be offered to young women with early-stage ovarian neoplasms who wish to preserve their fertility potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panwad Ratanasrithong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nayyar N, Lakhwani P, Goel A, Pande PK, Kumar K. Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors-Still a Gray Zone. Indian J Surg Oncol 2017; 8:607-614. [PMID: 29203995 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0697-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are a heterogeneous group of non-invasive epithelial ovarian tumors that occur at a younger age, present in early stage, frequently associated with infertility but are easily curable. Although they may have symptomatic long-term recurrences, they have an excellent prognosis in spite of peritoneal spread. Among the epithelial tumors of the ovary, BOTs fall in the spectrum lying between cystadenomas (benign) and cystadenocarcinomas (malignant). Their oncological behavior is more aggressive than benign ovarian tumors but relatively less than that of malignant ovarian tumors. Since the age group affected is usually young females, preservation of fertility is an important aspect of treatment protocol. Although the management of these tumors has been extensively discussed, it still remains a controversial gray zone. In this review, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histologic subtypes, various surgical approaches, follow-up, and management of recurrence have been discussed. Choosing the best treatment still poses a challenge for the treating oncosurgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Nayyar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer Centre, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Prerna Lakhwani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer Centre, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer Centre, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Pankaj Kr Pande
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer Centre, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Kapil Kumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer Centre, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Oncologic and obstetric outcomes of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors in women of reproductive age. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2017; 60:289-295. [PMID: 28534015 PMCID: PMC5439278 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.3.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the oncologic and obstetric outcomes in reproductive-age females with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) treated with cyst enucleation (CE) or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO). Methods The medical records of patients with BOTs treated between 1998 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The recurrence rates in the USO and CE groups were compared, and the postoperative obstetric outcomes were assessed via telephone survey. Results Eighty-nine patients with BOTs underwent USO, and 19 underwent CE. Of these, six patients had recurrent BOTs. The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the USO group (3/89, 3.4%) than in the CE group (3/19, 15.8%) (P=0.032). All patients with recurrent disease were successfully treated with further surgery. Of the 76 patients interviewed by telephone, 71 (93.4%) resumed regular menstruation after surgery. Twenty-six of the 32 patients (81.3%) who attempted to conceive had successful pregnancies. USO (19/24, 79.2%), like CE (7/8, 87.5%), resulted in favorable pregnancy rates for patients with BOTs. Conclusion USO is a suitable fertility-preserving surgery for women with BOTs. CE is also an acceptable option for select patients.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Nikpayam M, Body G, Fritel X, Uzan C, Morice P, Daraï E, Ballester M. Improving the clinical management of women with borderline tumours: a recurrence risk scoring system from a French multicentre study. BJOG 2017; 124:937-944. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours; Tours France
- INSERM U1069; Université François-Rabelais; Tours France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Hôpital Tenon; Paris France
- UMR S 707; Epidemiology; Information Systems; Modelling; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| | - M Nikpayam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Hôpital Tenon; Paris France
- UMR S 707; Epidemiology; Information Systems; Modelling; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| | - G Body
- Department of Gynaecology; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours; Tours France
- INSERM U1069; Université François-Rabelais; Tours France
| | - X Fritel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie; CHU de Poitiers; Université de Poitiers; Poitiers France
- INSERM CIC 1402; CHU de Poitiers; Poitiers France
| | - C Uzan
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
- INSERM U 10-30; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
- INSERM U 10-30; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - E Daraï
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Hôpital Tenon; Paris France
- INSERM UMR S 938; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| | - M Ballester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Hôpital Tenon; Paris France
- INSERM UMR S 938; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer in a 20 year old woman: A case from the Ohio State University College of Medicine. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144:451-455. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
42
|
Hannibal CG, Vang R, Junge J, Frederiksen K, Kurman RJ, Kjaer SK. A nationwide study of ovarian serous borderline tumors in Denmark 1978-2002. Risk of recurrence, and development of ovarian serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 144:174-180. [PMID: 27836204 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Absolute risk and risk factors for recurrence and ovarian serous carcinoma following ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) is not well-established. METHODS We included all women with SBTs in Denmark, 1978-2002. Diagnoses were confirmed by centralized pathology review and classified as atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) or noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Implants were classified as noninvasive or invasive. Medical records were collected and reviewed, and follow-up was obtained. Subsequent diagnoses were also confirmed by centralized pathology review. We examined absolute risk and risk factors for recurrent APST and serous carcinoma using Cox regression. RESULTS The absolute serous carcinoma risk after, respectively, 5 and 20years was 5.0% and 13.9% for noninvasive LGSC, and 0.9% and 3.7% for APST. Serous carcinoma risk was significantly higher following noninvasive LGSC compared with APST among stage I patients/patients without implants (HR=5.3; 95% CI: 1.7-16.3), whereas no significant association with tumor type was found in advanced stage patients/patients with implants. Advanced stage - notably invasive implants - bilaterality, surface involvement, and residual disease increased serous carcinoma risk. However, women with stage I APST also had a higher risk than the general population. CONCLUSIONS This largest population-based cohort of verified SBTs revealed that women with noninvasive LGSC are significantly more likely to develop serous carcinoma than women with APST, which could not entirely be explained by invasive implants. Although invasive implants was a strong risk factor for serous carcinoma, even women with stage I APST were at increased risk compared with the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Gerd Hannibal
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Russell Vang
- Departments of Pathology and Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Weinberg Building, Room 2242, 401 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Jette Junge
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Frederiksen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robert J Kurman
- Departments of Gynecology/Obstetrics, Pathology and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Weinberg Building, Room 2242, 401 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 49:13-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
44
|
Feichtinger M, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Fertility preservation in women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2016; 3:8. [PMID: 27468354 PMCID: PMC4962474 DOI: 10.1186/s40661-016-0029-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Although cancer in general affects an aged population, a significant number of women develop cancer at childbearing age. Long-term survival rates after gynecological cancer, especially in young patients are increasing and all quality-of-life aspects, including preservation of fertility have become of major relevance. Outcomes Surgical techniques aimed at sparing reproductive organs and preserving fertility have been developed for women presenting with gynecological cancer found at early stages. Indications for fertility-sparing surgery are in general restricted to women presenting with a well-differentiated low-grade tumor in its early stages or with low malignant potential. Up to now, use of fertility-sparing techniques in well-selected patients has not been shown to affect overall survival negatively and fertility outcomes reported have been favorable. Still larger amounts of data and longer follow-up periods are needed. Several current fertility-sparing cancer treatments may result in sub-fertility and in those cases assisted reproductive techniques are indicated. Overall quality of life has been satisfactory in cancer patients after fertility-sparing surgery. Conclusions Fertility-sparing surgery is a viable tool to enable gynecological cancer patients of young age to fulfill their family building without impairment of oncological outcome. Cancer patients of reproductive age should undergo fertility counseling to analyze this sensitive subject. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of fertility-sparing treatment and combined adjuvant therapy in higher-grade cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Feichtinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Wunschbaby Institut Feichtinger, Vienna, Austria ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Novumhuset Plan 4, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology - Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Novumhuset Plan 4, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen RF, Li J, Zhu TT, Yu HL, Lu X. Fertility-sparing surgery for young patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs): single institution experience. J Ovarian Res 2016; 9:16. [PMID: 26988551 PMCID: PMC4797121 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0226-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility-sparing surgery for patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological safety and fertility benefits in conservative surgery,as well as efficiency of surgical procedures and approaches. RESULTS In total 122 patients with BOTs, four types of fertility-sparing surgery were performed: unilateral adnexectomy (UA, n = 47), unilateral cystectomy (UC, n = 59), unilateral adnexectomy + contralateral cystectomy (UA + CC, n = 7) and bilateral cystectomy (BC, n = 9). Fifty-two (42.6 %) patients had undergone laparoscopy, while 70 (57.4 %) had undergone laparotomy. After a median follow-up of 58.0 months, eight patients (6.6 %) relapsed in average of 25.9 months. Only one patient progressed to invasive cancer. None died within our observational period. Univariate analysis showed that patients with elevated CA125, bilateral tumors, extra-ovary tumor or mucinous type tended to replase in shorter time (p < 0.05). Among all cases, 45 patients attempted to conceive and 34 (75.6 %) patients had successful pregnancy. The recurrence rates were successively increased (2.1 %, 6.8 %, 14.3 %, and 22.2 %), the recurrence interval were shortened (48.0, 25.3, 26.0 and 21.2 months) and the subsequent fertility rates were 76.9 %, 77.3 %, 66.7 % and 71.4 % in UA, UC, UA + CC, and BC groups, respectively. As for surgical approaches, three patients (5.8 %) relapsed in 26.3 months in the laparoscopy group and five (7.1 %) in 25.5 months in the laparotomy group. The subsequent fertility rate was higher in laparoscopy group (88.9 %) than in laparotomy group (66.7 %). In our study, 38 patients underwent staging surgery. Two patients (5.3 %) recurrent in average of 21.0 months, and the subsequent pregnancy rate of staging surgery group was 61.5 %. Twelve patients received adjuvant chemotherapy but they didn't get any benefit from it, both in term of recurrence (8.3 %, 26.0 months) and subsequent pregnancy rate (75.5 %). CONCLUSION Fertility-sparing surgery is safe and beneficial for most young BOTs. UA through laparoscopy should be recommended as the first choice. To the patients with bilateral tumors, elevated CA125, extra-ovary tumor or mucinous type, conservative surgery should be carefully chosen and subsequent pregnancy should be attempted in short term. In addition, the benefit of comprehensive surgical staging is to be further investigated and adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui-Fang Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128# Shen-yang Road in Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128# Shen-yang Road in Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Ting-Ting Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128# Shen-yang Road in Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Hai-Lin Yu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128# Shen-yang Road in Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Xin Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128# Shen-yang Road in Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shim SH, Kim SN, Jung PS, Dong M, Kim JE, Lee SJ. Impact of surgical staging on prognosis in patients with borderline ovarian tumours: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2016; 54:84-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2015] [Revised: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
47
|
Helpman L, Beiner ME, Aviel-Ronen S, Perri T, Hogen L, Jakobson-Setton A, Ben-Baruch G, Korach J. Safety of ovarian conservation and fertility preservation in advanced borderline ovarian tumors. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:138-44. [PMID: 25956371 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Revised: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of a fertility-sparing approach on disease recurrence in women with advanced borderline ovarian tumors. DESIGN Historic cohort study. SETTING A tertiary referral center for gynecological oncology patients and a university teaching hospital. PATIENT(S) Consecutive patients with advanced borderline ovarian tumors defined as stage IC and above, treated at a single institution during a span of 30 years. INTERVENTION(S) Data on surgical approach (e.g., fertility sparing, ovarian conserving) as well as histopathology, disease stage, CA-125 level, and use of chemotherapy were collected from the medical records, and their impact on disease recurrence was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Recurrence-free interval. Its association with the type of surgery and with other clinical and pathological features was assessed using the Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULT(S) Fifty-nine patients with advanced disease were identified. Median follow-up was 55.3 months. Mean age at diagnosis was 35 years. Most of the tumors (51, 84.4%) had serous histology. Twenty-seven patients (45.8%) developed recurrences and 6 (10%) died of their disease. Mean time to recurrence was 30.6 months. Of 44 women ≤40 years, 33 (75%) had a fertility-sparing procedure. Fertility preservation was not associated with disease recurrence. A total of 34 pregnancies and 26 live births were documented among 21 patients attempting conception. CONCLUSION(S) Borderline ovarian tumors carry a favorable prognosis, even at an advanced stage. Fertility preservation was not found to be associated with an increased risk of relapse in young patients with advanced disease, and may be reasonably considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limor Helpman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Mario E Beiner
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Tamar Perri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Liat Hogen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | - Gilad Ben-Baruch
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob Korach
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vasconcelos I, de Sousa Mendes M. Conservative surgery in ovarian borderline tumours: a meta-analysis with emphasis on recurrence risk. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:620-31. [PMID: 25661104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2014] [Revised: 12/24/2014] [Accepted: 01/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent reports have stirred the debate regarding the optimal conservative treatment for both serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumour (BOT). The aim of this study is to examine the optimal oncological approach of conservative surgery in unilateral BOT (cystectomy (C) versus unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO)) and in bilateral BOT (bilateral C (BC) versus USO+contralateral C (CC)), as well as fertility outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed database and Cochrane Library were searched using the search terms (((Borderline) OR (low malignant potential)) AND (ovarian)) AND ((tumour) OR (cancer)) AND (((fertility sparing) OR (conservative)) AND surgery). RESULTS We analysed 39 studies that included 5105 women (2624 patients with serous-, 2120 patients with mucinous- and the remaining with other types of BOT), 2752 of which underwent conservative surgery (817 underwent C, 89 BC, 1686 USO and 118 USO+CC). Eight studies included only stage I patients, in 14 studies more than 90% of patients were stage I and five studies included only late-stage patients. Seven studies included only patients with serous borderline ovarian tumour (sBOT) and two only mucinous borderline ovarian tumour (mBOT). A total of 296 patients with non-invasive-, 76 patients with invasive- and 50 patients with unspecified implants were pooled. Of the patients undergoing C, BC, USO and USO+CC the pooled recurrence estimates were respectively 25.3%, 25.6%, 12.5% and 26.1%. In meta-analysis, USO was significantly favored over C with an OR for recurrence reduction=2200, 95% CI=0.793-2.841 and p<0.0001. The pooled recurrence estimate as invasive ovarian cancer was 15.4% and the pooled 95% CI was 0.120-0.196. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 55.7% with 45.4% for USO and 40.3.0% for C. CONCLUSION Cystectomy in unilateral serous BOT is significantly associated with a higher recurrence rate, albeit no impact on survival can be demonstrated. Whether this is related to the duration of follow-up, remains to be proven. Nonetheless, recent data seem to suggest that USO is advisable in the case of mucinous BOT. On the contrary, a more conservative approach (BC) should be definitively favored in bilateral BOT, which is almost always serous, because no significant difference is seen in terms of recurrence rate when compared to USO+CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Vasconcelos
- Charité, Gynecology Department, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Miguel de Sousa Mendes
- Vivantes Neukolln Clinic, Obstetrics Department, Rudower Straße 48, 12351 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Trillsch F, Mahner S, Vettorazzi E, Woelber L, Reuss A, Baumann K, Keyver-Paik MD, Canzler U, Wollschlaeger K, Forner D, Pfisterer J, Schroeder W, Muenstedt K, Richter B, Fotopoulou C, Schmalfeldt B, Burges A, Ewald-Riegler N, de Gregorio N, Hilpert F, Fehm T, Meier W, Hillemanns P, Hanker L, Hasenburg A, Strauss HG, Hellriegel M, Wimberger P, Kommoss S, Kommoss F, Hauptmann S, du Bois A. Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): a subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:660-6. [PMID: 25562434 PMCID: PMC4333495 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Revised: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference pathology) treated between 1998 and 2008 at 24 German AGO centres were analysed. In 559 patients with serous BOT and adequate ovarian surgery, further recommended staging procedures (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, cytology) were evaluated applying Cox regression models with respect to progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS For patients with one missing staging procedure, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.25 (95%-CI 0.66-2.39; P=0.497). This risk increased with each additional procedure skipped reaching statistical significance in case of two (HR 1.95; 95%-CI 1.06-3.58; P=0.031) and three missing steps (HR 2.37; 95%-CI 1.22-4.64; P=0.011). The most crucial procedure was omentectomy which retained a statistically significant impact on PFS in multiple analysis (HR 1.91; 95%-CI 1.15-3.19; P=0.013) adjusting for previously established prognostic factors as FIGO stage, tumour residuals, and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION Individual surgical staging procedures contribute to the prognosis for patients with serous BOT. In this analysis, recurrence risk increased with each skipped surgical step. This should be considered when re-staging procedures following incomplete primary surgery are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Trillsch
- Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Gynaekologie, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Mahner
- Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Gynaekologie, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Vettorazzi
- Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institut fuer Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Woelber
- Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Gynaekologie, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Reuss
- Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Koordinierungszentrum fuer Klinische Studien, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - K Baumann
- Universitaetsklinikum Giessen u. Marburg GmbH, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie, Gyn. Endokrinologie und Onkologie, Baldingerstr., 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - M-D Keyver-Paik
- Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet, Universitaets-Frauenklinik, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - U Canzler
- Technische Universitaet Dresden, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - K Wollschlaeger
- Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg, Universitaets-Frauenklinik, Gerhart-Hauptmann-Str. 35, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - D Forner
- Sana-Klinikum Remscheid, Klinik fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtsmedizin, Burger Strasse 211, 42859 Remscheid, Germany
| | - J Pfisterer
- 1] Staedtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe, Gotenstrasse 1, 42653 Solingen, Germany [2] Zentrum fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie, Herzog-Friedrich-Str. 21, 24103 Kiel, Germany
| | - W Schroeder
- GYNAEKOLOGICUM Bremen, Schwachhauser Heerstrasse 367, 28211 Bremen, Germany
| | - K Muenstedt
- Universitaetsklinikum Giessen, Zentrum fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikstrasse 33, 35352 Giessen, Germany
| | - B Richter
- Elblandkliniken Meissen-Radebeul GmbH & Co. KG, Frauenklinik, Heinrich-Zille-Str. 13, 01445 Radebeul, Germany
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Frauenklinik, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - B Schmalfeldt
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet, Frauen- und Poliklinik, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - A Burges
- Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen, Campus Grosshadern, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Marchioninistr.15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - N Ewald-Riegler
- Dr Horst Schmidt Klinik GmbH, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und gynaekologische Onkologie, Ludwig-Erhard-Str. 100, 65199 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - N de Gregorio
- Universitaetsklinikum Ulm, Frauenklinik, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - F Hilpert
- Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe, Michaelisstrasse 16, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- 1] Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Department fuer Frauengesundheit, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany [2] Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf, Universitaetsfrauenklinik, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - W Meier
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Frauenklinik, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - P Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - L Hanker
- 1] Klinikum der J.W. Goethe-Universitaet, Zentrum fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [2] Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany
| | - A Hasenburg
- Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg, Frauenklinik, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - H-G Strauss
- Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale), Universitaetsklinik und Poliklinik fuer Gynaekologie, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - M Hellriegel
- Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
| | - P Wimberger
- 1] Technische Universitaet Dresden, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany [2] Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Klinik fuer Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Essen, Germany
| | - S Kommoss
- 1] Dr Horst Schmidt Klinik GmbH, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und gynaekologische Onkologie, Ludwig-Erhard-Str. 100, 65199 Wiesbaden, Germany [2] Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Department fuer Frauengesundheit, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - F Kommoss
- Institut fuer Pathologie, Referenzzentrum fuer Gynaekopathologie, A2,2, 68159 Mannheim, Germany
| | - S Hauptmann
- 1] Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale), Universitaetsklinik und Poliklinik fuer Gynaekologie, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany [2] Institut fuer Pathologie Trier-Dueren-Duesseldorf, Roonstrasse 30, 52351 Dueren, Germany
| | - A du Bois
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie, Henricistrasse 92, 45136 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Esfahani K, Ferrario C, Le P, Panasci L. Aromatase inhibition in relapsing low malignant potential serous tumours of the ovary. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014:bcr-2014-204287. [PMID: 24925537 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Low malignant potential serous tumours (LMPSTs) of the ovary represent an indolent disease, with an excellent prognosis in a majority of patients. Patients with recurrent LMPSTs tend to develop widespread disease with a mortality rate as high as 70%. These tumours tend to have a very poor response to standard chemotherapy, and the management of primary and recurrent disease beyond surgical resection is not well defined. The majority of LMPST have been reported to express oestrogen and progesterone hormone receptors. However, only three reported cases of antihormonal treatment in this setting, and only one using aromatase inhibitors (AI), have been previously reported. We herein report long-term complete remission of two patients with relapsed, chemotherapy-resistant LMPSTs, treated with long-term AI (anastrozole 1 mg daily) as per negative MRI and positron emission tomography scans. Our results warrant further investigation for the use of AIs for metastatic recurrent LMPSTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khashayar Esfahani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cristiano Ferrario
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philippe Le
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Panasci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|