1
|
Erozkan K, Elamin D, Tasci ME, Liska D, Valente MA, Alipouriani A, Schabl L, Lavryk O, Catalano B, Krishnamurthi S, Miller JA, Purysko AS, Steele SR, Gorgun E. Evaluating Complete Response Rates and Predictors in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00544-4. [PMID: 39067745 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), there is a paradigm shift from conventional neoadjuvant treatment to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Despite its growing acceptance, there are limited studies have examined its effects on disease presentation. It is also important to determine the factors that play a role in complete response (CR). Our previous data with 119 patients revealed that the CR rate was 37%, and low rectal tumors and the absence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were predictors of CR. Unfortunately, there continues to be a lack of data, and reliable markers are still needed to consistently identify the best respondents. Therefore, we aimed to determine factors associated with CR. We hypothesized that due to the growing patient population, both predictive factors and CR ratio might evolve over time. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who completed TNT for LARC at our tertiary care center between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Our primary outcome was to determine predictors of CR. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the 2-year disease-free and overall survival rates. CR consists of patients who sustained clinical CR (cCR) for at least 12 months under WW or had pathological CR (pCR) after surgery. RESULTS Out of 339 patients with LARC, 208 (61.3%) successfully completed TNT. Among them, 57 (27.4%) patients achieved cCR, and 80% sustained without tumor regrowth after a year. The remaining 151 (72.6%) patients underwent surgery, and 42 had pCR. The final CR rate was 42.3%. The median age of the patients was 56 (49-66), and 63.5% of the participants were male (n=132), while 36.5% were female (n=76). The median tumor size was 4.95cm (3.6-6.43), with most tumors in the low rectum (119, 57.2%). The MRF involvement rate was 25% (n=52), and EMVI was observed in 20.7% of patients (n=43). based on MRI findings. Low rectal tumors, the absence of MRF involvement, and the absence of EMVI were predicted CR. With a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly higher among patients with CR (91.3% vs 71%, p<0.01 and 98.8% vs 90.2% p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION In our updated dataset, we observed an increasing CR rate compared to our previous study. In addition to previously identified predictors, low tumor location and the absence of EMVI, we also found the absence of MRF involvement as a predictor of CR. These findings offer valuable insights for clinical practice, helping clinicians set clear expectations when counseling patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Erozkan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Doua Elamin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Muhammed Enes Tasci
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Michael A Valente
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ali Alipouriani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lukas Schabl
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Olga Lavryk
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brogan Catalano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Jacob A Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Section of Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Radiology Department, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Swartjes H, Sijtsma FPC, Elferink MAG, van Erning FN, Moons LMG, Verheul HMW, Berbée M, Vissers PAJ, de Wilt JHW. Trends in incidence, treatment, and relative survival of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2021. Eur J Cancer 2024; 205:114104. [PMID: 38733716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed rapidly over the years. The aim of this study was to assess the trends in incidence, treatment, and relative survival (RS) of patients diagnosed with CRC in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2021. PATIENTS AND METHODS 2 75667 patients diagnosed with CRC between 2000 and 2021 were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Analyses were stratified for disease extent (localised: T1-3N0M0; regional: T4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0; distant: T1-4N0-2M1) and localisation (colon; rectum). Trends were assessed with joinpoint regression. RESULTS CRC incidence increased until the mid-2010s but decreased strongly thereafter to rates comparable with the early 2000s. Amongst other trend changes, local excision rates increased for patients with localised colon (2021: 13.6 %) and rectal cancer (2021: 34.9 %). Moreover, primary tumour resection became less common in patients with distant colon (2000-2021: 60.9-12.5 %) or rectal cancer (2000-2021: 47.8-6.9 %), while local treatment of metastases rates increased. Five-year RS improved continuously for localised and regional colon (97.7 % and 72.0 % in 2017, respectively) and rectal cancer (95.2 % and 76.3 % in 2017, respectively). The rate of anti-cancer treatments decreased in distant colon (2010-2021: 80.3 % to 67.2 %; p < 0.001) and rectal cancer (2011-2021: 86.0 % to 77.0 %; p < 0.001). The improvement of five-year RS stagnated for distant colon (2010-2017: 11.2 % to 11.9 %; average percentage of change [APC]: 2.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -7.6, 4.7) and rectal cancer (2009-2017: 12.7 % to 15.6 %; APC: 1.4, 95 % CI: -19.1, 5.5). CONCLUSIONS Major changes in the incidence and treatment of CRC between 2000 and 2021 were identified and quantified. Five-year RS increased continuously for patients with localised and regional CRC, but stagnated for patients with distant CRC, likely caused by decreased rates of anti-cancer treatment in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Swartjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Femke P C Sijtsma
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike Berbée
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panni RZ, D'Angelica M. Stage IV Rectal Cancer and Timing of Surgical Approach. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:248-255. [PMID: 38882938 PMCID: PMC11178389 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roheena Z Panni
- Complex General Surgical Oncology, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Michael D'Angelica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Seow W, Dudi-Venkata NN, Selva-Nayagam S, Penniment M, Sammour T. Oncological Outcomes and Response Rate After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Induction vs. Consolidation Chemotherapy vs. Standard Chemoradiation. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024:S1533-0028(24)00056-2. [PMID: 38945765 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
TNT is now considered the preferred option for stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the prognostic benefit and optimal sequence of TNT remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared short- and long-term outcomes amongst patients with LARC receiving total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as induction (iTNT) or consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT) with those receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) alone. A systematic literature search was performed between 2012 and 2023. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with a random-effects model and vague prior distribution to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves were used to rank treatment(s) for each outcome. In total, 11 cohorts involving 8360 patients with LARC were included. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) amongst the 3 treatments. Compared with nCRT, both cTNT (OR 2.36; 95% CrI, 1.57-3.66) and iTNT (OR 1.99; 95% CrI, 1.44-2.95) significantly improved complete response (CR) rate. Notably, cTNT ranked as the best treatment for CR (SUCRA 0.90) and iTNT as the best treatment for 3-year DFS and OS (SUCRA 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Both iTNT and cTNT strategies significantly improved CR rates compared with nCRT. cTNT was ranked highest for CR rates, while iTNT was ranked highest for 3-year survival outcomes. However, no other significant differences in DFS, OS, sphincter-saving surgery, R0 resection and postoperative complications were found amongst the treatment groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Luke Traeger
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Warren Seow
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim S, Huh JW, Lee WY, Yun SH, Kim HC, Cho YB, Park Y, Shin JK. Predicting survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with effective chemoradiotherapy response. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108361. [PMID: 38657375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer patients often display favorable responses and favorable oncologic outcomes. Due to the low recurrence rate, there is scarcity of studies investigating the prognostic factors influencing their survival. Therefore, our study sought to assess the prognostic factors associated with survival in rectal cancer patients who achieved either a pathologic complete response or a pathologic stage I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection. METHODS In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from cohort of 1394 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision from January 2008 to April 2017. Finally, we selected 474 (34.2 %) who exhibited either a pathologic complete response or attained pathologic stage I following the treatment. Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic factors influencing disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 161 (34 %) achieved a pathologic complete response. Our analysis revealed that circumferential resection margin and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for disease-free survival (p = 0.011, p = 0.022). Furthermore, factors influencing overall survival included the clinical N stage and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.035, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION In conclusion, the circumferential resection margin, clinical N stage, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for survival in patients showing good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. For patients with a positive circumferential resection margin and clinical N (+) stage, intensive follow-up might be needed to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes. Also, we recommend considering adjuvant chemotherapy as a beneficial treatment approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seijong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Wook Huh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Woo Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Hyeon Yun
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoonah Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Kyong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Brien T, Hospers G, Conroy T, Lenz HJ, Smith JJ, Andrews E, O'Neill B, Leonard G. The role of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a survey of specialists attending the All-Ireland Colorectal Cancer Conference 2022 including lead investigators of OPRA, PRODIGE-23 and RAPIDO. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:1183-1190. [PMID: 38141097 PMCID: PMC11128399 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03591-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has evolved following recent landmark trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)-the delivery of preoperative chemotherapy sequenced with radiation. AIM To assess the preferences of colorectal surgery (CRS), radiation oncology (RO) and medical oncology (MO) specialists attending the All-Ireland Colorectal Cancer Conference (AICCC) 2022 regarding the neoadjuvant management of LARC. METHODS A live electronic survey explored the preferred treatment approach and TNT regimen for early-, intermediate-, bad-, and advanced-risk categories of rectal cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines. The survey was preceded by an update from lead investigators of TNT trials (OPRA, PRODIGE-23 and RAPIDO), who then participated in a multidisciplinary panel discussion. RESULTS Ten CRS, 7 RO and 15 MO (32 of 45 specialists) participated fully in the survey resulting in a response rate of 71%. Ninety-four percent, 76% and 53% of specialists preferred a TNT approach for patients with advanced, bad, and intermediate-risk rectal cancer, respectively. A consolidation TNT regimen of long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was the most preferred regimen. Upfront surgery was preferred by 77% for early-risk disease. CONCLUSION This survey illustrated the general acceptance of TNT by rectal cancer specialists attending the AICCC as a valuable treatment strategy for higher-risk category LARC. Whilst the treatment of LARC changes, it remains best practice to individualize care, incorporating the selective use of TNT as discussed by an MDT and in keeping with the patient's goals of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Brien
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
| | - Geke Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jesse Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmet Andrews
- Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Brian O'Neill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gregory Leonard
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Unrau S, Barthwal M, Gurram L, Edward M, Hurton S, Kim C, Nashed M. Clinical Outcomes in T4 and/or N2 Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024:S1533-0028(24)00047-1. [PMID: 38964940 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features. METHODOLOGY In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019. RESULTS The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (P = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (P = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR. CONCLUSIONS Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mansi Barthwal
- Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piringer G, Ponholzer F, Thaler J, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Rumpold H, de Vries A, Weiss L, Greil R, Gnant M, Öfner D. Prediction of survival after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a retrospective analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1374592. [PMID: 38817890 PMCID: PMC11137682 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1374592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine if the response to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and may act as a potential surrogate endpoint for disease free survival and overall survival. Results Eight hundred seventy-eight patients from five centers were analyzed. There were 304 women and 574 men; the median age was 64.7 years. 77.6% and 22.4% of patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy, resulting in a pathological complete response in 7.3%. T-downstaging and N-downstaging occurred in 50.5% and 37% of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. In patients with T-downstaging, the 10-year DFS and 10-year OS were 64.8% and 66.8% compared to 37.1% and 45.9% in patients without T-downstaging. N-downstaging resulted in 10-year DFS and 10-year OS in 56.2% and 62.5% compared to 47.3% and 52.3% without N-downstaging. Based on routinely evaluated clinical parameters, an absolute risk prediction calculator was generated for 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival. Conclusion T-downstaging and N-downstaging after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy resulted in better DFS and OS compared to patients without response. Based on clinical parameters, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS can be predicted using a prediction calculator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gudrun Piringer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Wels-Grieskirchen Medical Hospital, Wels, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Florian Ponholzer
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Josef Thaler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Wels-Grieskirchen Medical Hospital, Wels, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Holger Rumpold
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Alexander de Vries
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Feldkirch Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- 3 Medical Department of Internal Medicine III, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- 3 Medical Department of Internal Medicine III, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Medioni M, Cervantes B, Huguet F, Bachet JB, Parc Y, André T, Lefèvre JH, Cohen R. [An update on total neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:483-495. [PMID: 38553289 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
A major advance has been made in the management of rectal cancer, with the emergence in 2021 of total neoadjuvant treatment. The main publications from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials reported a significant improvement in progression-free survival and the pathological complete response rate. The aim of this review is to synthesize recent data on neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, to explain the long-term results of the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials, and to put them into perspective, considering current advances in de-escalation strategies. The update of the 5-year survival data from the RAPIDO trial highlights an increased risk of loco-regional relapse, with 11.7% of relapses in the experimental group and 8.1% in the control group, while the update of the PRODIGE-23 trial confirms the benefits of this treatment regimen, with a significant improvement in overall survival. In addition, the results of the OPRA and PROPSPECT trials confirm the benefit of total neoadjuvant treatment with induction chemotherapy, as well as the possibility of surgical de-escalation in the OPRA trial and radiotherapy in the PROSPECT trial. The challenge for the future is to identify patients who require total neoadjuvant treatment with the aim of curative surgery to obtain a cure without local or distant relapse, and those for whom therapeutic de-escalation can be envisaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroussia Medioni
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Cervantes
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Thierry André
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang H, Han L, Guo J, Zhang Y, Lin S, Chen S, Lin X, Cheng C, Guo Z, Qiu Y. Pretreatment MRI-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Rectal Cancer Outcome: A Discovery and Validation Study. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1878-1888. [PMID: 37996362 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Accurate prediction of local recurrence or distant metastasis is critical for developing individualized therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients after standard therapy. This study aims to develop and validate a multiparameter MRI-based radiomics signature (RS) for prognostic prediction in LARC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) and to explore the ability of RS for personalized survival risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this multi-center study, 454 patients who received nCRT and TME and completed 3 years of follow-up participated. RS was constructed for prognostic prediction based on features extracted from pretreatment multiparameter MRI in a training cohort (TC; n = 298), which was tested in an internal validation cohort (IVC; n = 75) and further validated in an independent external validation cohort (EVC; n = 81). Furthermore, the ability of RS for personalized survival risk stratification was explored using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS The RS model showed satisfactory accuracy for prognostic prediction with AUCs of 0.83, 0.81 and 0.82 in the TC, IVC and EVC, respectively. In addition, RS helped to refine risk stratification for LARC patients on the basis of significantly different 3-year disease-free survival rates, independent of their pathological stage, pre-surgery CEA, and even treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS The proposed RS can be used not only to predict local recurrence or distant metastasis but also to serve as an effective postoperative survival risk stratification tool for clinicians to facilitate decision-making for LARC patients receiving standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyan Huang
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China
| | - Lujun Han
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China
| | - Jianbo Guo
- Department of Radiology, Meizhou People's Hospital, No. 63 Huangtang Road, Meizhou 514000 P.R. China
| | - Yanyu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Duobao AVE 56, Liwan district, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Shiwei Lin
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China
| | - Shengli Chen
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoshan Lin
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China
| | - Caixue Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China
| | - Zheng Guo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Hematological Malignancies, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Xueyuan AVE 1098, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, P.R. China
| | - Yingwei Qiu
- Department of Radiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhutiani N, Peacock O, Uppal A, You YN, Bednarski BK, Skibber JM, Messick C, White MG, Chang GJ, Konishi T. The current multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:394-400. [PMID: 38707228 PMCID: PMC11066499 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer has rapidly evolved over the last several years. This review describes recent data surrounding total neoadjuvant therapy, organ preservation, and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes. It then presents our treatment algorithm for management of rectal cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the context of this and other existing literature. As part of this discussion, the review describes how we tailor management based upon both patient and tumor-related factors in an effort to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Bhutiani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Y. Nancy You
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Brian K. Bednarski
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - John M. Skibber
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Craig Messick
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Michael G. White
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - George J. Chang
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sullo FG, Passardi A, Gallio C, Molinari C, Marisi G, Pozzi E, Solaini L, Bittoni A. Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2562. [PMID: 38731090 PMCID: PMC11084727 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer presents a significant burden globally, often requiring multimodal therapy for locally advanced cases. Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery have been conventional neoadjuvant approaches. Recent trials favor LCRT due to improved local control. However, distant tumor recurrence remains a concern, prompting the exploration of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as a comprehensive treatment strategy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise, particularly in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, potentially revolutionizing neoadjuvant regimens. Nonoperative management (NOM) represents a viable alternative post-neoadjuvant therapy for selected patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR). Additionally, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a non-invasive method for the assessment of treatment response. This review synthesizes current evidence on TNT, ICIs, NOM, and ctDNA, elucidating their implications for rectal cancer management and highlighting avenues for future research and clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giulio Sullo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Gallio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Molinari
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Giorgia Marisi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Eleonora Pozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Alessandro Bittoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou J, Huang J, Zhou Z, Deng X, Wu Q, Wang Z. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a three-group propensity score matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:38. [PMID: 38492080 PMCID: PMC10944449 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04610-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a therapeutic approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the optimal chemotherapy cycles within TNT remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the prognostic efficacy of varying cycles of chemotherapy during TNT for LARC. METHODS Patients diagnosed with LARC (T3-4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0), who underwent TNT or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) between 2015 and 2020, were retrospective included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their neoadjuvant strategy: CRT (long-course chemoradiotherapy), STNT (long-course CRT with one to three cycles of chemotherapy), and LTNT (long-course CRT with four or more cycles of chemotherapy). Propensity score matching (PSM) based on gender, age, body mass index, tumor distance from the anal verge, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, and mesorectal fascia status was employed to reduce confounding bias. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS The study comprised 372 patients, with 73 patients in each group after PSM. Compared with CRT, both STNT and LTNT demonstrated improved DFS (5-year rate: 59.7% vs. 77.8% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.027) and MFS (5-year rate: 65.1% vs. 81.3% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.030). There was no difference in DFS or MFS between STNT and LTNT. These favorable outcomes were consistent among subgroups defined by tumor distance from the anal verge ≥ 5 cm, clinical T3 stage, clinical N positive status, or involved mesorectal fascia. CONCLUSION Compared to CRT, both STNT and LTNT demonstrated improved DFS and MFS outcomes. Notably, survival outcomes were similar between STNT and LTNT, suggesting that chemotherapy cycles in TNT may not significantly impact survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahao Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Zikai Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Qingbin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liang Y, Liao H, Shi H, Li T, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Li M, Li A, Liu Y, Yao Y, Li T. Risk stratification of stage II rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1352660. [PMID: 38511138 PMCID: PMC10952835 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1352660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The treatment strategy for stage II rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMA) recommends neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCR) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). However, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) remains controversial. Materials and methods Chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between pathological classification, AC and clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and the log-rank test were utilized to analyze differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among different groups. Cox regression identified prognostic factors. Nomogram was established utilizing the independent prognostic factors. X-tile divided patients into three risk subgroups. Results Compared to RMA, rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) demonstrates longer OS and CSS in all and non-AC stage II patients, with no difference in OS and CSS for AC stage II patients. Propensity score matching analyses yielded similar results. Stratified analysis found that AC both improve OS of RA and RMA patients. Age, gender, pathologic T stage, regional nodes examined, and tumor size were identified as independent prognostic factors for RMA patients without AC. A nomogram was constructed to generate risk scores and categorize RMA patients into three subgroups based on these scores. KM curves revealed AC benefits for moderate and high-risk groups but not for the low-risk group. The external validation cohort yielded similar results. Conclusions In summary, our study suggests that, compared to stage II RA patients, stage II RMA patients benefit more from AC after NCR. AC is recommended for moderate and high-risk stage II RMA patients after NCR, whereas low-risk patients do not require AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahang Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Hualin Liao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Haoran Shi
- Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Yaxiong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Yuli Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Mingming Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Aidi Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Yao Yao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| | - Taiyuan Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
John AO, Singh A, Bala D, Joel A, Georgy JT, Jesudasan MR, Mittal R, Ram TS, Reddy JR, Murthy A, Chandramohan A, Eapen A, Masih D, Ramnath N, Dobrosotskaya I, Yadav B, Chacko RT. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) with Full Dose Concurrent Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma Including Signet Ring and Mucinous Cancers. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:307-317. [PMID: 37479897 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00941-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with pre-operative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy results in improved survival and is becoming the new standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We describe our experience with TNT consisting of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy using full dose 5FU without oxaliplatin. METHODS Adults with biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed LARC with high-risk characteristics on pelvic MRI (T4a or T4b, extramural vascular invasion, N2, mesorectal fascia involvement, enlargement/tumor deposits on lateral lymph nodes) were included. The TNT protocol comprised of six biweekly courses of modified FOLFOX6 followed by pelvic RT with four concurrent cycles of biweekly 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 + LV 200 mg/m2 without oxaliplatin to complete 20 uninterrupted weeks of full dose 5FU. Surgery was planned 11-13 weeks after completing chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS Eighty-four LARC patients, including 26% with signet-ring cell carcinoma, with high-risk MRI characteristics were treated with the TNT protocol with a 96% completion rate. Significant (> grade 3) toxicities included neutropenia (23.8%), diarrhea (14.2%) anemia (10.7%), and two deaths. The median DFS at 2 years was 22.5 months with better survival noted for those who underwent surgery or had cCR (with NOM) compared to those who did not undergo surgery (due to progression, inadequate regression, or patient preference despite residual disease) -mDFS 27.7 months versus 11.4 months, p = < 0.0001 and mOS 29.2 months versus 15 months p = < 0.0001. CONCLUSION The hybrid TNT regimen was administered without significant dose delays or interruptions. Toxicity was manageable but with two treatment-related deaths. Ability to undergo surgery after TNT predicted for improved DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajoy Oommen John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India.
| | - Divya Bala
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India
| | - Anjana Joel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India
| | - Josh Thomas Georgy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India
| | | | - Rohin Mittal
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Thomas Samuel Ram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Arvind Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Anu Eapen
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Dipti Masih
- Department of Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Nithya Ramnath
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ann Arbor Healthcare Systems, University of Michigan, Veterans Administration, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Irina Dobrosotskaya
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ann Arbor Healthcare Systems, University of Michigan, Veterans Administration, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Bijesh Yadav
- Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Raju Titus Chacko
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil, Nadu-632004, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang J, Deng Q, Chen Z, Chen Y, Fu Z. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338098. [PMID: 38406812 PMCID: PMC10889113 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has emerged as the established treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, there remains a debate regarding the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who exhibit a favorable tumor response (ypT0-2N0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological prognosis of rectal cancer patients who have a good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Materials and methods The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Articles were searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes assessed were 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis. The data was summarized using a random effects model. Results A meta-analysis was conducted using 18 retrospective studies published between 2009 and 2023. The studies included 9 from China and 5 from Korea, involving a total of 6566 patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The pooled data revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year overall survival (OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.65, P=0.008), recurrence-free survival (OR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.20-2.48, P=0.003), and reduced distant metastasis (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, P=0.011). However, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant effect on disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and local recurrence in ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer. Subgroup analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in improving overall survival for ypT1-2N0 rectal cancer (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.13-3.19, P=0.003). Conclusion The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may provide benefits in terms of oncological outcomes for rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery. However, further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianguo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qican Deng
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhenzhou Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yajun Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhongxue Fu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang J, Deng Q, Cheng Y, Fu Z, Wu X. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcome of rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:31. [PMID: 38273352 PMCID: PMC10809453 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03300-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer is typically treated using a combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal resection. While achieving pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been recognized as a positive prognostic factor in oncology, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after surgery remains uncertain. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients who attain pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS This meta-analysis followed the guidelines outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). The Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature. RESULTS A total of 34 retrospective studies, including 9 studies from the NCBD database, involving 31,558 patients with pathological complete response rectal cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2023. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.803, 95% CI 0.678-0.952, P = 0.011), and no heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%). Locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a higher 5-year overall survival rate compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.605, 95% CI 1.183-2.177, P = 0.002). However, the analysis also revealed that postoperative ACT did not lead to improvements in disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival within the same patient population. Subgroup analysis indicated that pathological complete response patients with clinical stage T3/T4, lymph node positivity, and younger than 70 years of age may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on improving overall survival among rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. However, no such association was observed in terms of disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianguo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Qican Deng
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Zhongxue Fu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Conces ML, Mahipal A. Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:366-382. [PMID: 38248109 PMCID: PMC10813931 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Local and metastatic recurrence are primary concerns following the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Chemoradiation (CRT) can reduce the local recurrence rates and has subsequently moved to the neoadjuvant setting from the adjuvant setting. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates have also been noted to be greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. The standard approach to treating LARC would often involve CRT followed by surgery and optional adjuvant chemotherapy and remained the treatment paradigm for almost two decades. However, patients were often unable to complete adjuvant chemotherapy due to a decreased tolerance of chemotherapy following surgery, which led to upfront treatment with both CRT and chemotherapy, and total neoadjuvant therapy, or TNT, was created. The efficacy outcomes of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and pCR have improved in patients receiving TNT compared to the standard approach. Additionally, more recent data suggest a possible improvement in overall survival as well. Patients with a complete clinical response following TNT have the opportunity for watch-and-wait surveillance, allowing some patients to undergo organ preservation. Here, we discuss the clinical trials and studies that led to the adoption of TNT as the standard of care for LARC, with the possibility of watch-and-wait surveillance for patients achieving complete responses. We also review the possibility of overtreating some patients with LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amit Mahipal
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wojcieszynski AP, Chuong MD, Hawkins M, Jethwa KR, Kim H, Raldow A, Sanford NN, Olsen JR. Rectal Cancer Update: Which Treatment Effects Are the Least "Brutal"? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1-7. [PMID: 38049215 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kwakman JJM, Bond MJG, Demichelis RM, Koopman M, Hompes R, Elferink MAG, Punt CJA. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-negative but pathologically node-positive rectal cancer in the Netherlands: A retrospective analysis. Eur J Cancer 2024; 197:113466. [PMID: 38061213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accurate clinical staging of rectal cancer is hampered by suboptimal sensitivity of MRI in the detection of regional lymph node metastases. Consequently, some patients may be understaged and have been withheld neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in retrospect. Although Dutch guidelines do not advocate adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in rectal cancer, some of these clinically understaged patients receive ACT according to local policy. We aim to assess the benefit of ACT in these patients. METHODS Population-based data from patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) but pathologically node-positive (pN+) rectal cancer that underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) without neoadjuvant treatment between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Stabilised inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was compared in ACT and non-ACT patients. RESULTS Of 34,724 patients, 13,861 had cN0 disease of whom 3016 were pN+ (21.8%). 1466 (48.6%) of these patients underwent upfront TME and were included. Median follow-up was 84 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-97) versus 79 months (95% CI 77-81) in patients that did (n = 290, 19.8%) and did not (n = 1176, 80.2%) receive ACT, respectively. After sIPTW adjustment, ACT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.49-0.99; p = 0.04). The estimated 5-year OS rate was 74.2% versus 65.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION In this population-based cohort of patients with cN0 but pN+ rectal cancer who underwent upfront TME, ACT was associated with a significant OS benefit. These data support to discuss ACT in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes J M Kwakman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Ramzi M Demichelis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boustani J, Huguet F, Vendrely V. Practice-changing clinical trials in radiation oncology for gastrointestinal malignancies in 2021-2023. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:768-777. [PMID: 38415359 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most frequent cancers and a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We provide an overview of the most important practice-changing trials that were either published or presented at the international scientific meetings in 2021-2023. Highlights included reports on three phase III trials (CONCORDE/PRODIGE 26, ARTDECO, and a study by Xu et al.) that evaluated dose escalation in the definitive setting for locally advanced oesophageal cancers, as well as two phase III trials that evaluated the role of chemotherapy (neo-AEGIS) and targeted therapy (NRG/RTOG 1010) in the neoadjuvant setting for adenocarcinoma oesophageal cancers or gastroesophageal junction cancer. CheckMate 577 evaluated nivolumab in patients who had residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by complete resection. The use of radiation therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is also discussed (SMART and CONKO-007 trials). Stereotactic body radiation therapy followed by sorafenib was compared to sorafenib alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the NRG/RTOG 1112 study. New options in the management of rectal cancer are emerging such as total neoadjuvant treatment (PRODIGE 23, RAPIDO, PROSPECT), organ preservation (OPRA, OPERA), and the role of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch-repair deficient/microsatellite instability. Finally, preliminary results of the ACT 4 trial that evaluated de-escalation in anal cancer are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France; Inserm, EFS BFC, UMR 1098, RIGHT, Greffon-hôte-tumeur interactions/Ingénierie cellulaire et génique, université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
| | - F Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (BRIC), UMR1312, Inserm, université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang S, Cai G, Xie P, Sun C, Li B, Dai W, Liu X, Qiu Q, Du Y, Li Z, Liu Z, Tian J. Improving prognosis and assessing adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in locally advanced rectal cancer with deep learning for MRI: A retrospective, multi-cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109899. [PMID: 37660753 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant therapy is recommended to minimize the risk of distant metastasis (DM) and local recurrence (LR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, its role is controversial. We aimed to develop a pretreatment MRI-based deep learning model to predict LR, DM, and overall survival (OS) over 5 years after surgery and to identify patients benefitting from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The multi-survival tasks network (MuST) model was developed in a primary cohort (n = 308) and validated using two external cohorts (n = 247, 245). An AC decision tree integrating the MuST-DM score, perineural invasion (PNI), and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) was constructed to assess chemotherapy benefits and aid personalized treatment of patients. We also quantified the prognostic improvement of the decision tree. RESULTS The MuST network demonstrated high prognostic accuracy in the primary and two external cohorts for the prediction of three different survival tasks. Within the stratified analysis and decision tree, patients with CA19-9 levels > 37 U/mL and high MuST-DM scores exhibited favorable chemotherapy efficacy. Similar results were observed in PNI-positive patients with low MuST-DM scores. PNI-negative patients with low MuST-DM scores exhibited poor chemotherapy efficacy. Based on the decision tree, 14 additional patients benefiting from AC and 391 patients who received over-treatment were identified in this retrospective study. CONCLUSION The MuST model accurately and non-invasively predicted OS, DM, and LR. A specific and direct tool linking chemotherapy decisions and benefit quantification has also been provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Zhang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guoxiang Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiyi Xie
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Caixia Sun
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Bao Li
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Center for Biomedical Imaging, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Weixing Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiangyu Liu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qi Qiu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Du
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenhui Li
- Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
| | - Zhenyu Liu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Tian
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Xue W, Wang T, Yao J, Wu W, Chen D, Yan B, Dong X, Tang Y, Zeng Y, He Y, Cao P, Shao F, Huang W, Deng C, Yan J. Use of patient-derived tumor organoid platform to predict the benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for poor responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Bioeng Transl Med 2023; 8:e10586. [PMID: 38023722 PMCID: PMC10658544 DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for poor responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains debatable among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), necessitating biomarkers to accurately predict the benefits of AC. This study aimed to develop a patient-derived tumor organoid (PDTO) platform to predict the benefit of AC in LARC patients showing poor nCRT response. PDTOs were established using irradiated rectal cancer specimens with poor nCRT responses, and their sensitivity to chemotherapy regimens was tested. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value for the PDTO drug test was defined based on the clinical outcomes, and the accuracy of the PDTO prognostic predictions was calculated. Predictive models were developed and validated using the PDTO drug test results. Between October 2018 and December 2021, 86 PDTOs were successfully constructed from 138 specimens (success rate 62.3%). The optimal IC50 cut-off value for the organoid drug test was 39.31 μmol/L, with a sensitivity of 84.75%, a specificity of 85.19%, and an accuracy of 84.88%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the PDTO drug test was an independent predictor of prognosis. A nomogram based on the PDTO drug test was developed, showing good prognostic ability in predicting the 2-year and 3-year disease-free survivals (AUC of 0.826 [95% CI, 0.721-0.931] and 0.902 [95% CI, 0.823-0.982], respectively) and overall survivals (AUC of 0.859 [95% CI, 0.745-0.973] and 0.885 [95% CI, 0.792-0.978], respectively). The PDTO drug test can predict the benefit of postoperative AC in poor responders with LARC to nCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weisong Xue
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan UniversityShenzhenGuangdongChina
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryShenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and TechnologyShenzhenGuangdongChina
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Jiaxin Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Dexin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Botao Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yuting Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yunli Zeng
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yueyu He
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Peihua Cao
- Clinical Research Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Department of BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Fangyuan Shao
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of MacauMacauPeople's Republic of China
| | - Wenhua Huang
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human AnatomySchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
| | - Chuxia Deng
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of MacauMacauPeople's Republic of China
| | - Jun Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal CancerNanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongPeople's Republic of China
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan UniversityShenzhenGuangdongChina
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryShenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and TechnologyShenzhenGuangdongChina
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grassi E, Zingaretti C, Petracci E, Corbelli J, Papiani G, Banchelli I, Valli I, Frassineti GL, Passardi A, Di Bartolomeo M, Pietrantonio F, Gelsomino F, Carandina I, Banzi M, Martella L, Bonetti AV, Boccaccino A, Molinari C, Marisi G, Ugolini G, Nanni O, Tamberi S. Phase II study of capecitabine-based concomitant chemoradiation followed by durvalumab as a neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer: the PANDORA trial. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101824. [PMID: 37774508 PMCID: PMC10594026 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab as neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The PANDORA trial is a prospective, phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of preoperative treatment with durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks for three administrations) following long-course radiotherapy (RT) plus concomitant capecitabine (5040 cGy RT in 25-28 fractions over 5 weeks and capecitabine administered at 825 mg/m2 twice daily). The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate; secondary endpoints were the proportion of clinical complete remissions and safety. The sample size was estimated assuming a null pCR proportion of 0.15 and an alternative pCR proportion of 0.30 (α = 0.05, power = 0.80). The proposed treatment could be considered promising if ≥13 pCRs were observed in 55 patients (EudraCT: 2018-004758-39; NCT04083365). RESULTS Between November 2019 and August 2021, 60 patients were accrued, of which 55 were assessable for the study's objectives. Two patients experienced disease progression during treatment. Nineteen out of 55 eligible patients achieved a pCR (34.5%, 95% confidence interval 22.2% to 48.6%). Regarding toxicity related to durvalumab, grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in four patients (7.3%) (diarrhea, skin toxicity, transaminase increase, lipase increase, and pancolitis). Grade 4 toxicity was not observed. In 20 patients (36.4%), grade 1-2 AEs related to durvalumab were observed. The most common were endocrine toxicity (hyper/hypothyroidism), dermatologic toxicity (skin rash), and gastrointestinal toxicity (transaminase increase, nausea, diarrhea, constipation). CONCLUSION This study met its primary endpoint showing that CRT followed by durvalumab could increase pCR with a safe toxicity profile. This combination is a promising, feasible strategy worthy of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Grassi
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Degli Infermi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Faenza
| | - C Zingaretti
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - E Petracci
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - J Corbelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Degli Infermi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Faenza
| | - G Papiani
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna
| | - I Banchelli
- Pathology Unit, "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna
| | - I Valli
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - G L Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - A Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - M Di Bartolomeo
- Gastroenterological Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
| | - F Pietrantonio
- Gastroenterological Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
| | - F Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena
| | - I Carandina
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Sant'Anna" University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara
| | - M Banzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Santa Maria Nuova" Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia
| | - L Martella
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Sant'Anna" University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara
| | - A V Bonetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Mater Salutis" Hospital, Legnago
| | - A Boccaccino
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna
| | - C Molinari
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - G Marisi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - G Ugolini
- General Surgery Unit, "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - O Nanni
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola
| | - S Tamberi
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Degli Infermi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Faenza; Medical Oncology Unit, "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tran T, Van Nguyen H, Thi Nguyen H, Van Nguyen H. Adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A retrospective study in Vietnamese patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85:4234-4238. [PMID: 37674661 PMCID: PMC10473352 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgical techniques offered improvements in rates of locoregional recurrence but did not address distant metastasis. Traditionally, adjuvant chemotherapy has been administered with the goal of limiting systemic recurrences. Objective Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, 103 patients diagnosed with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine or XELOX regimens after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and toxicity were analyzed. Results The median follow-up time was 52.5 months (6.5-66.8 months). The mean 3-year disease-free survival and 3-year overall survival were 86.2% (95% CI: 82.8-89.6) and 92.2% (95% CI: 86.9-97.5), respectively. The rate of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was low, mostly grades 1 and 2 including anemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and liver enzymes elevations were 85.4, 50.5, 42.8, and 45.6%, respectively. Conclusion The capecitabine and XELOX regimen in adjuvant settings for rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was a safe and effective modality. Further randomized trials need to be conducted to evaluate the role of postoperative therapy for these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thang Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Hospital
| | - Huy Van Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Hospital
| | - Hoa Thi Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Hospital
| | - Hung Van Nguyen
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Hanoi Medical University Hospital
- Department of Oncology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Han Q, Zeng H, Xu W, Wu M. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer: Current status and future prospects. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2023; 31:615-621. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v31.i15.615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, has made revolutionary progress in the treatment strategies for various types of cancer. Regarding colorectal cancer (CRC), the current clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is primarily categorized based on mutation patterns, including deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) or non-high microsatellite instability (non-MSI-H). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated good efficacy against dMMR/MSI-H CRC by increasing T-cell infiltration into tumor tissues. However, the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for pMMR/non-MSI-H CRC remains uncertain. Due to the lower prevalence of dMMR/MSI-H in CRC, recent clinical trials have reported combined applications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy to achieve better therapeutic outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy, primarily consisting of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, not only downstages the tumor but also provides benefits from local control, thus improving clinical symptoms and quality of life. Integrating immunotherapy into neoadjuvant therapy may alter the treatment approach for potentially resectable or certain metastatic CRC cases. In this article, we focus on the development of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and discuss its future prospects for the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qu Han
- First Department of General Surgery, Fengcheng City People's Hospital, Fengcheng 331100, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Hui Zeng
- First Department of General Surgery, Fengcheng City People's Hospital, Fengcheng 331100, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Mo Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Daprà V, Airoldi M, Bartolini M, Fazio R, Mondello G, Tronconi MC, Prete MG, D’Agostino G, Foppa C, Spinelli A, Puccini A, Santoro A. Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12159. [PMID: 37569532 PMCID: PMC10418822 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has undergone a significant paradigm shift in recent years with the rising adoption of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). This comprehensive approach entails administering chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy. To establish and deliver the optimal tailored treatment regimen to the patient, it is crucial to foster collaboration among a multidisciplinary team comprising healthcare professionals from various specialties, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, and pathology. This review aims to provide insights into the current state of TNT for LARC and new emerging strategies to identify potential directions for future research and clinical practice, such as circulating tumor-DNA, immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors, and nonoperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Daprà
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Airoldi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Michela Bartolini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Roberta Fazio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mondello
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Tronconi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Maria Giuseppina Prete
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe D’Agostino
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Caterina Foppa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alberto Puccini
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lai SH, Vogel JD, Vemuru S, Messersmith W, Lieu C, McCarter MD, Birnbaum E, Chapman BC. Improved Survival After Adjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Pathologic Complete Response. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:983-993. [PMID: 36602514 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant therapy is unclear in patients with rectal cancer achieving a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival among rectal cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING National Cancer Database (2004-2017). PATIENTS Patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) followed by total mesorectal excision with a pathologic complete response were included. INTERVENTION Adjuvant chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall survival. RESULTS There were 20,518 patients and 2221 (11%) had a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Of 2221 patients, 1441 (65%) did not receive adjuvant therapy and 780 (35%) did. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger (median 58 vs 62 y), have private insurance (61% vs 49%), and have node-positive disease (57% vs 48%) (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in sex, race, Charlson-Deyo score, clinical T-stage, tumor size and differentiation, adequate lymphadenectomy (12 or more), or sphincter preservation between groups (all p > 0.05). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 14 years was significantly longer in the adjuvant group (93%, 85%, 83%, respectively) compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (87%, 67%, 51%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with clinical stage 2 and 3 rectal cancer ( p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, omission of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly worse survival (HR 1.53, 95% 1.08-2.16). LIMITATIONS Selection bias, unknown perioperative morbidity, chemotherapy regimen, recurrence status, and other unidentified factors limiting survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in patients achieving a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C139 . SOBREVIDA MEJORADA DESPUS DE LA TERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO CON RESPUESTA PATOLGICA COMPLETA ANTECEDENTES:En los pacientes con cáncer de recto que logran una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y la escisión total del mesorrecto, el beneficio de la terapia adyuvante no está claro.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el beneficio de la quimioterapia adyuvante en la sobrevida de los pacientes con cáncer de recto con una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer (2004-2017).PACIENTES:Pacientes con adenocarcinoma rectal en estadio clínico 2 ó 3 que se sometieron a quimiorradiación neoadyuvante (50-50,4 Gy en 25-28 fracciones) seguida de escisión mesorrectal total con una respuesta patológica completa.INTERVENCIÓN:Quimioterapia adyuvante.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:Hubo 20.518 pacientes y 2.221 (11%) tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Entre estos 2221 pacientes, 1441 (65%) no recibieron terapia adyuvante y 780 (35%) sí. Los pacientes que recibieron terapia adyuvante tenían más probabilidades de ser más jóvenes (mediana de 58 frente a 62 años), tener un seguro privado (61% frente a 49%) y tener enfermedad con linfonodos positivos (57% frente a 48 %) (todos p < 0,05). No hubo diferencias en género, raza, puntuación de Charlson-Deyo, estadio T clínico, tamaño y diferenciación del tumor, linfadenectomía adecuada (≥12) o preservación del esfínter entre los grupos (todos p > 0,05). La sobrevida general a los 5, 10 y 14 años fue significativamente mayor en el grupo adyuvante (93%, 85%, 83%, respectivamente) en comparación con los pacientes que no recibieron terapia adyuvante (87%, 67%, 51% respectivamente) ( p < 0,001). En un análisis de subgrupos, la terapia adyuvante se asoció con una mejor sobrevida general en pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico 2 y 3 ( p < 0,001). Después de ajustar por las características del paciente y del tumor, la omisión de la quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció con una sobrevida global significativamente peor (HR 1,53, IC del 95%, 1,08-2,16).LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de selección; morbilidad perioperatoria desconocida, régimen de quimioterapia, estado de recurrencia y otros factores no identificados que limitan el análisis de sobrevida.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico 2 ó 3, la quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció con una mejor sobrevida general en pacientes que lograron una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C139 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel H Lai
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sudheer Vemuru
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Christopher Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Elisa Birnbaum
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brandon C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hofste LSM, Geerlings MJ, von Rhein D, Rütten H, Westenberg AH, Weiss MM, Gilissen C, Hofste T, van der Post RS, Klarenbeek BR, de Wilt JHW, Ligtenberg MJL. Circulating tumor DNA detection after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery predicts recurrence in patients with early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1283-1290. [PMID: 36740555 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer are often treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or watch and wait. This study evaluated the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to measure disease after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery to optimize treatment choices. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with rectal cancer treated with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included and diagnostic biopsies were analyzed for tumor-specific mutations. Presence of ctDNA was measured in plasma by tracing the tumor-informed mutations using a next-generation sequencing panel. The association between ctDNA detection and clinicopathological characteristics and progression-free survival was measured. RESULTS Before treatment ctDNA was detected in 69% (35/51) of patients. After neoadjuvant therapy ctDNA was detected in only 15% (5/34) of patients. In none of the patients with a complete clinical response who were selected for a watch and wait strategy (0/10) or patients with ypN0 disease (0/8) ctDNA was detected, whereas it was detected in 31% (5/16) of patients with ypN + disease. After surgery ctDNA was detected in 16% (3/19) of patients, of which all (3/3) developed recurrent disease compared to only 13% (2/16) in patients with undetected ctDNA after surgery. In an exploratory survival analysis, both ctDNA detection after neoadjuvant therapy and after surgery was associated with worse progression-free survival (p = 0.01 and p = 0.007, respectively, Cox-regression). CONCLUSION These data show that in patients with early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer tumor-informed ctDNA detection in plasma using ultradeep sequencing may have clinical value to complement response prediction after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa S M Hofste
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Geerlings
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel von Rhein
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Heidi Rütten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A Helen Westenberg
- Institute for Radiation Oncology Arnhem, 6815, AD, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan M Weiss
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Gilissen
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tom Hofste
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liscu HD, Liscu BR, Mitre R, Anghel IV, Antone-Iordache IL, Balan A, Coniac S, Miron AI, Halcu G. The Conditioning of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Rectal Cancer Determined by Postoperative Pathological Characteristics in Romania. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1224. [PMID: 37512037 PMCID: PMC10384917 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) suffered changes thanks to the development of improved surgical procedures, radiation delivery, and chemotherapy. Although treatment options improved individually, the optimal order is still debated. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the "golden standard" for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is no common ground in international guidelines on the indications of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJCHT), with differences between the American, European, and Japanese guidelines. This paper studies the preferences of Romanian oncologists in prescribing ADJCHT. We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of all nonmetastatic, ECOG 0-1 LARC patients staged II-III who underwent TME and were admitted to the Oncology or Radiotherapy Department of Colțea Clinical Hospital, Bucharest between January 2017 and March 2021. A total of 186 patients were included in the study. A positive correlation was found between ADJCHT and each of the following: (y)pT > 2, (y)pN > 0, and the presence of perineural invasion (PNI+). A strong positive correlation was found between ADJCHT and the presence of at least one risk factor: (y)pT > 2, (y)pN > 0, PNI+, lymphovascular invasion, positive margins, or tumor grade > 1. Tumor downstaging decreased the risk of metastases in the first 2 years and was associated with the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, while adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the chance of nodal downstaging. ADJCHT practice for LARC in Romania follows either NCCN or ESMO guidelines, at the discretion of the oncologist, due to the lack of national guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horia-Dan Liscu
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Radiotherapy Department, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan-Radu Liscu
- Radiotherapy Department, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ruxandra Mitre
- Medical Oncology Department, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana-Valentina Anghel
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ionut-Lucian Antone-Iordache
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Balan
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Simona Coniac
- Medical Oncology Department, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea-Iuliana Miron
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Medical Oncology Department, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Georgian Halcu
- Discipline of Pathological Anatomy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ahmadi-Amoli H, Rahimi M, Abedi-Kichi R, Ebrahimian N, Hosseiniasl SM, Hajebi R, Rahimpour E. Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:234. [PMID: 37316696 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02934-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A temporary loop ileostomy is one of the most common methods for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection. However, the optimal timing of loop ileostomy reversal remains unknown. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the debilitating complications caused by early closure of ileostomy in comparison with late closure in rectal cancer patients. DESIGN A randomized, controlled, unblinded, and monocentric trial. METHODS A total of 104 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to the case group of early closure of ileostomy (n = 50) and the control group of late closure of ileostomy (n = 54). This trial was undertaken in a single colorectal institution, a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. Randomization and allocation to the trial group were conducted by using variable block randomization based on quadruple numbers. The primary endpoint of this trial was determined by the complications of early ileostomy closure versus those of late closure in rectal cancer patients who had undergone low anterior resection. In early closure, loop ileostomy is reversed 2-3 weeks after the first two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy, while in late closure, the ileostomy is reversed 2-3 weeks after the last course of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Follow-up of 1 year demonstrated a reduction in the risk of complications and an improved quality of life in patients with rectal cancer following low anterior resection and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) in the case group but did not reach a significant difference (p = 0.555). In addition, there was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, operative time, readmission, and reoperation; also, no statistically significant differences were reported between the groups in patients' quality of life or LARS score. CONCLUSION In summary, it seems that early closure of ileostomy is not better than late closure in improving patients' quality of life with rectal cancer following low anterior resection and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant); no statistical difference was observed for reduction of risk of ostomy complications. Thus, neither of these methods (early closure versus late closure) is superior to the other, and controversy still exists. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION IRCT20201113049373N1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi Ahmadi-Amoli
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Rahimi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Rajaee Cardiovascular Medical and Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Raziyeh Abedi-Kichi
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nazli Ebrahimian
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Reza Hajebi
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Rahimpour
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Square, Imam Khomeini Street, Isfahan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wu Q, Zhou J, Huang J, Deng X, Li C, Meng W, He Y, Wang Z. Total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2023; 110:784-796. [PMID: 37191308 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy is a promising treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, utilizing either short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, but their relative efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to investigate clinical outcomes amongst patients receiving total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, and those receiving long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. All studies that compared at least two of these three treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate, and survival outcomes were adopted as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Thirty cohorts were included. Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.43 to 2.26) and total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy (OR 1.75, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 2.50) improved the pathological complete response rate. Similar benefits were observed in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except for short-course radiotherapy with one to two cycles of chemotherapy. No significant differences in survival outcomes were found amongst the three treatments. Long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (HR 0.44, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.99) exhibited higher disease-free survival than long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy with greater than or equal to three cycles of chemotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate, and long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy may lead to a marginal benefit in disease-free survival. The pathological complete response rate and survival outcomes are similar for total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingbin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiahao Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Changtao Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yazhou He
- Department of Oncology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Liao H, Zeng T, Xie X, Li J, Li D, KejinYan, Chen F, Zhu H. Adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve cancer-specific survival for pathologic stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: evidence based on long-term survival analysis from SEER data. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:134. [PMID: 37199862 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04428-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial in rectal cancer, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). This retrospective study aims at evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy's long-term survival benefits in stage II and stage III rectal adenocarcinoma (RC). METHODS This study obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database registered between 2010 and 2015. The survival analyses used the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank test. The factors that affect survival outcomes were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The propensity score matching (1:4) was used to ensure the balance of variables between different groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time for overall patients was 64 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 51.3% and 67.4% in the adjuvant chemotherapy (-) group and 73.9% and 79.6% in the adjuvant chemotherapy ( +) group (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). However, subgroup analysis showed adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT improved the 5-year OS but not CSS rates in stage II and stage III RC (p = 0.003, p = 0.004; p = 0.29, p = 0.3). Univariate and multivariate analyses found adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT was an independent prognosis factor of OS but not CSS (HR 0.8, 95%CI 0.7-0.92, p < 0.001; p = 0.276). CONCLUSION The survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with the status of NCRT for pathological stage II and III RC. For patients who did not receive NCRT, adjuvant chemotherapy is needed to significantly improve long-term survival rates. However, adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT did not significantly improve long-term CSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualin Liao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang , Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang , Jiangxi, 330006, China
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Tengyu Zeng
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Xianqiang Xie
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Jiyang Li
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Dongsheng Li
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - KejinYan
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Fan Chen
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Hongliang Zhu
- The 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Koukourakis IM, Kouloulias V, Tiniakos D, Georgakopoulos I, Zygogianni A. Current status of locally advanced rectal cancer therapy and future prospects. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103992. [PMID: 37059276 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer treatment has been evolving ever since the beginning of the 20th century. Surgery was originally the only available method regardless of the extent of tumor invasion or nodal involvement status. Total mesorectal excision was established as the standard procedure in the early 1990s. Advances in the utilization of radiation for rectal cancer led to the addition of radiotherapy (RT) combined with chemotherapy to the postoperative treatment algorithm. The promising results of the Swedish short-course preoperative RT set the basis for a number of large randomized trials investigating the efficacy of neoadjuvant RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced rectal cancer. Both short-course RT and long-course preoperative CRT compared favorably to adjuvant treatment and became the standard of choice for patients with extramural invasion or lymph node involvement. Recently, the focus of clinical research has been shifted towards total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), delivering the whole course of RT and chemotherapy before surgery, and showing good tolerance and encouraging efficacy. Although targeted therapies haven't displayed a benefit in the neoadjuvant setting, preliminary evidence suggests impressive efficacy of immunotherapy in rectal carcinomas with mismatch-repair deficiency. In this review, we provide an in-depth critical overview of all significant randomized trials that have shaped the current treatment guidelines for locally advanced rectal cancer and discuss future trends for the treatment of this common malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis M Koukourakis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUOA), Athens, Greece.
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, Rimini 1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece.
| | - Dina Tiniakos
- Department of Pathology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Ioannis Georgakopoulos
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUOA), Athens, Greece.
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUOA), Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Xiong K, Bao T, Cao Y, Hu W, Deng J, Chen J, Xiao T. Efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:89. [PMID: 37004572 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has changed from a single radical surgical treatment to the current multimodality treatment (standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)). The efficacy and safety of both TNT and standard CRT are evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS RCTs were comprehensively searched in Chinese and English electronic databases. The experimental and control groups were TNT and the standard CRT, respectively, included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes were assessed through a fixed-effect or random-effect model of pooled odds (OR) or hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS Eleven RCTs, involving 3,101 patients were included in the final analysis. TNT showed increase in the pathological complete response (pCR) (OR = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-2.41; P < 0.05) and the R0 resection (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99-1.43; P = 0.062). There was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (HR = 0.97, P = 0.803), but TNT had better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, P < 0.05), overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.02, P = 0.08) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.93, P < 0.05) than standard CRT. CONCLUSIONS TNT was safe and feasible as it improved pCR and survival outcomes, and reduced the risk of distant metastasis compared with standard CRT. TNT may be a superior strategy for LARC, but more RCTs are needed to prove it. REGISTRATION AND PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42022327697. We added the Chinese database after registration because of the inclusion of fewer RCTs www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Xiong
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Tiantian Bao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China
| | - Yibo Cao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China
| | - Wenting Hu
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Jia Deng
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Jiang Chen
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China.
| | - Tianbao Xiao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mei WJ, Wang XZ, Li YF, Sun YM, Yang CK, Lin JZ, Wu ZG, Zhang R, Wang W, Li Y, Zhuang YZ, Lei J, Wan XB, Ren YK, Cheng Y, Li WL, Wang ZQ, Xu DB, Mo XW, Ju HX, Ye SW, Zhao JL, Zhang H, Gao YH, Zeng ZF, Xiao WW, Zhang XP, Zhang X, Xie E, Feng YF, Tang JH, Wu XJ, Chen G, Li LR, Lu ZH, Wan DS, Bei JX, Pan ZZ, Ding PR. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With CAPOX Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Uninvolved Mesorectal Fascia (CONVERT): Initial Results of a Phase III Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 277:557-564. [PMID: 36538627 PMCID: PMC9994847 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) with CAPOX alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with uninvolved mesorectal fascia (MRF). BACKGROUND DATA nCRT is associated with higher surgical complications, worse long-term functional outcomes, and questionable survival benefits. Comparatively, nCT alone seems a promising alternative treatment in lower-risk LARC patients with uninvolved MRF. METHODS Patients between June 2014 and October 2020 with LARC within 12 cm from the anal verge and uninvolved MRF were randomly assigned to nCT group with 4 cycles of CAPOX (Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV day 1 and Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 d. Repeat every 3 wk) or nCRT group with Capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily administered orally and concurrently with radiation therapy (50 Gy/25 fractions) for 5 days per week. The primary end point is local-regional recurrence-free survival. Here we reported the results of secondary end points: histopathologic response, surgical events, and toxicity. RESULTS Of the 663 initially enrolled patients, 589 received the allocated treatment (nCT, n=300; nCRT, n=289). Pathologic complete response rate was 11.0% (95% CI, 7.8-15.3%) in the nCT arm and 13.8% (95% CI, 10.1-18.5%) in the nCRT arm ( P =0.33). The downstaging (ypStage 0 to 1) rate was 40.8% (95% CI, 35.1-46.7%) in the nCT arm and 45.6% (95% CI, 39.7-51.7%) in the nCRT arm ( P =0.27). nCT was associated with lower perioperative distant metastases rate (0.7% vs. 3.1%, P =0.03) and preventive ileostomy rate (52.2% vs. 63.6%, P =0.008) compared with nCRT. Four patients in the nCT arm received salvage nCRT because of local disease progression after nCT. Two patients in the nCT arm and 5 in the nCRT arm achieved complete clinical response and were treated with a nonsurgical approach. Similar results were observed in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS nCT achieved similar pCR and downstaging rates with lower incidence of perioperative distant metastasis and preventive ileostomy compared with nCRT. CAPOX could be an effective alternative to neoadjuvant therapy in LARC with uninvolved MRF. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yun-Feng Li
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital
| | - Yue-Ming Sun
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | | | | | - Zu-Guang Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou
| | - Rui Zhang
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
| | - Wei Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Yong Li
- Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou
| | | | - Jian Lei
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Xiang-Bin Wan
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Ying-Kun Ren
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Yong Cheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Liang Li
- First Affiliated hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming
| | | | | | - Xian-Wei Mo
- Guangxi Medical University Cancer Center, Nanning
| | - Hai-Xing Ju
- Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou
| | | | - Jing-Lin Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Jiangmen
| | - Hong Zhang
- Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang
| | | | | | | | | | - Xuan Zhang
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital
| | - E Xie
- Shantou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shantou
| | - Yi-Fei Feng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jin-Xin Bei
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou Guangdong
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yang J, Wu F, An H, Gan H. Incidence and risk outcomes of second primary malignancy of patients with post-operative colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:88. [PMID: 36995483 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04366-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This study aimed to investigate the incidence and the risk factors of incidence for second primary malignancies (SPMs) onset among survivors diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A large population-based cohort study was performed. Data of patients diagnosed with CRC was identified and extracted from 8 cancer registries of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from January 1990 to December 2017. The outcome of interest was percentage and common sites of SPM onset after primary CRC diagnosis. The cumulative incidence and standardize incidence rates (SIRs) were also reported. Afterwards, we estimated sub-distribution hazards ratios (SHRs) and relative risks (RRs) for SPM occurrence using multivariable competing-risk and Poisson regression models, respectively. RESULTS A total of 152,402 patients with CRC were included to analyze. Overall, 23,816 patients of all CRC survivors (15.6%) were reported SPM occurrence. The highest proportion of SPMs development after primary CRC diagnosis was second CRC, followed by lung and bronchus cancer among all survivors. Also, CRC survivors were more susceptible to develop second gastrointestinal cancers (GICs). Besides, pelvic cancers were analyzed with a relative high proportion among patients who received RT in comparison to those without RT. The cumulative incidence of all SPMs onset was 22.16% (95% CI: 21.82-22.49%) after near 30-year follow-up. Several factors including older age, male, married status, and localized stage of CRC were related to the high risk of SPMs onset. In treatment-specific analyses, RT was related to a higher cumulative incidence of SPMs occurrence (all SPMs: 14.08% vs. 8.72%; GICs: 2.67% vs. 2.04%; CRC: 1.01% vs. 1.57%; all p < 0.01). Furthermore, the increased risk of SPMs onset was found among patients who received RT than patients within the NRT group (SHR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.32-1.71), p < 0.01; RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.45-1.79, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The present study described the incidence pattern of SPM among CRC survivors and identified the risk factors of the SPM onset. RT treatment for patients diagnosed with CRC may increase the risk of SPMs occurrence. The findings suggest the need for long-term follow-up surveillance for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahui Yang
- Department of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fangli Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongjin An
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Gastroenterology and the Center of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Huatian Gan
- Department of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology and the Center of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Simillis C, Khatri A, Dai N, Afxentiou T, Jephcott C, Smith S, Jadon R, Papamichael D, Khan J, Powar MP, Fearnhead NS, Wheeler J, Davies J. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant treatment strategies for stage II and III rectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 183:103927. [PMID: 36706968 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Multiple neoadjuvant therapy strategies have been used and compared for rectal cancer and there has been no true consensus as to the optimal neoadjuvant therapy regimen. The aim is to identify and compare the neoadjuvant therapies available for stage II and III rectal cancer. DESIGN A systematic literature review was performed, from inception to August 2022, of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant therapies for stage II and III rectal cancer were considered. Stata was used to draw network plots, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted through models utilizing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in WinBUGS. RESULTS A total of 58 articles were included based on 41 randomised controlled trials, reporting on 12,404 participants that underwent 15 neoadjuvant treatment regimens. No significant difference was identified between treatments for major or total postoperative complications, anastomotic leak rates, or sphincter-saving surgery. Straight to surgery (STS) ranked as best treatment for preoperative toxicity but ranked worst treatment for positive resection margins and complete response. STS had significantly increased positive resection margins compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy with short-wait (LCCRT-SW) or long-wait (LCCRT-LW) to surgery, or short-course radiotherapy with short-wait (SCRT-SW) or immediate surgery (SCRT-IS). LCCRT-SW or LCCRT-LW resulted in significantly increased complete response rates compared to STS. LCCRT-LW significantly improved 2-year overall survival compared to STS, SCRT-IS, SCRT-SW. Total neoadjuvant therapy regimes with short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT-CT-SW), induction chemotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy (CT-LCCRT-S), long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (LCCRT-CT-S), significantly improved positive resection margins, complete response, and disease-free survival compared to STS. Chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy (CT+MAB-LCCRT+MAB-S) significantly improved complete response and positive resection margins compared to STS, and 2-year disease-free survival compared to STS, SCRT-IS, SCRT-SW, SCRT-CT-SW, LCCRT-SW, LCCRT-LW. CT+MAB-LCCRT+MAB-S ranked as best treatment for disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Conventional neoadjuvant therapies with short-course radiation or long-course chemoradiotherapy have oncological benefits compared to no neoadjuvant therapy without increasing perioperative complication rates. Prolonged wait to surgery may improve oncological outcomes. Total neoadjuvant therapies provide additional benefits in terms of complete response, positive resection margins, and disease-free survival. Monoclonal antibody therapy may further improve oncological outcomes but currently is only applicable to a small subgroup of patients and requires further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Simillis
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Amulya Khatri
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nick Dai
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thalia Afxentiou
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catherine Jephcott
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Smith
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rashmi Jadon
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jim Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Michael P Powar
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicola S Fearnhead
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Wheeler
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vernmark K, Knutsen A, Loftås P, Sun XF. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in mucinous and non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma patients after TME surgery. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282211. [PMID: 36848363 PMCID: PMC9970087 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The value of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients is debated and varies in different subgroups. One such subgroup is mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC), which is more treatment resistant compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC). To date, mucinous histology is not taken into account when deciding on adjuvant treatment strategy. This is the first study to exclusively include patients with rectal cancer, then separate MAC and NMAC and compare the survival in patients that had or did not have adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included retrospective register data from 365 Swedish patients with stage II-IV rectal adenocarcinoma, 56 patients with MAC and 309 patients with NMAC. All patients were considered curative, had surgery with total mesorectal excision in 2004-2013, and were followed up until death or 2021. RESULTS Patients with MAC that had adjuvant chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS, HR 0.42; CI 95%: 0.19-0.93; p = 0.032) and a trend towards better cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR 0.41 CI 95%: 0.17-1.03; p = 0.057) compared to patients without chemotherapy (HR 0.42; CI 95%: 0.19-0.93; p = 0.032). The difference in OS was still significant even after adjusting for sex, age, stage, differentiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy (HR 0.40; CI 95%: 0.17-0.92; p = 0.031). There was no such difference in the NMAC patients except in the stage-by-stage subgroup analyses where patients in stage IV had better survival after adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS There may be a difference in treatment response to adjuvant chemotherapy between MAC and NMAC patients. Patients with MAC could possibly benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II-IV. Further studies are however needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Vernmark
- Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Annika Knutsen
- Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Per Loftås
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Xiao-Feng Sun
- Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Rees JM, Wullaert L, Grüter AAJ, Derraze Y, Tanis PJ, Verheul HMW, Martens JWM, Wilting SM, Vink G, van Vugt JLA, Beije N, Verhoef C. Circulating tumour DNA as biomarker for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1083285. [PMID: 36793616 PMCID: PMC9922989 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1083285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been established as a promising (prognostic) biomarker with the potential to personalise treatment in cancer patients. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the current literature and the future perspectives of ctDNA in non-metastatic rectal cancer. Methods A comprehensive search for studies published prior to the 4th of October 2022 was conducted in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Google scholar, and Web of Science. Only peer-reviewed original articles and ongoing clinical trials investigating the association between ctDNA and oncological outcomes in non-metastatic rectal cancer patients were included. Meta-analyses were performed to pool hazard ratios (HR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results A total of 291 unique records were screened, of which 261 were original publications and 30 ongoing trials. Nineteen original publications were reviewed and discussed, of which seven provided sufficient data for meta-analyses on the association between the presence of post-treatment ctDNA and RFS. Results of the meta-analyses demonstrated that ctDNA analysis can be used to stratify patients into very high and low risk groups for recurrence, especially when detected after neoadjuvant treatment (HR for RFS: 9.3 [4.6 - 18.8]) and after surgery (HR for RFS: 15.5 [8.2 - 29.3]). Studies investigated different types of assays and used various techniques for the detection and quantification of ctDNA. Conclusions This literature overview and meta-analyses provide evidence for the strong association between ctDNA and recurrent disease. Future research should focus on the feasibility of ctDNA-guided treatment and follow-up strategies in rectal cancer. A blueprint for agreed-upon timing, preprocessing, and assay techniques is needed to empower adaptation of ctDNA into daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M van Rees
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lissa Wullaert
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yassmina Derraze
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Wilting
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geraldine Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen L A van Vugt
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nick Beije
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kang MK. Implications of recent neoadjuvant clinical trials on the future practice of radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1011-1025. [PMID: 36844136 PMCID: PMC9950859 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.1011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) and immunotherapy are two major issues in the treatment of LARC. In the two latest phase III randomized controlled trials (RAPIDO and PRODIGE23), the TNT approach achieved higher rates of pathologic complete response and distant metastasis-free survival than conventional chemoradiotherapy. Phase I/II clinical trials have reported promising response rates to neoadjuvant (chemo)-radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Accordingly, the treatment paradigm for LARC is shifting toward methods that increase the oncologic outcomes and organ preservation rate. However, despite the progress of these combined modality treatment strategies for LARC, the radiotherapy details in clinical trials have not changed significantly. To guide future radiotherapy for LARC with clinical and radiobiological evidence, this study reviewed recent neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating TNT and immunotherapy from a radiation oncologist’s perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 40414, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Damato A, Ghidini M, Dottorini L, Tomasello G, Iaculli A, Ghidini A, Luciani A, Petrelli F. Chemotherapy Duration for Various Indications in Colorectal Cancer: a Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:341-352. [PMID: 36781622 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01378-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved and become more personalized during the past several years. For example, depotentiation/reduced duration of systemic therapies has proven to be beneficial in both advanced and early stages of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS In particular, recent randomized studies of stage III and high-risk stage II CRC showed that a shorter duration (3 months), when compared to the historical 6-month comparator, provides nearly similar overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the setting of advanced, inoperable CRC, a relatively short induction phase (six to eight cycles) followed by biological agents is the current standard of care in RAS wild-type (wt). versus RAS mutated cases. With regard to potentially operable stage IV disease (with the aim of converting liver metastases to operability), a relatively short number of cycles (four to six cycles) should be offered with re-staging and re-evaluation for surgery as soon as possible in most cases. For inoperable liver metastases, a relatively intensive triplet or doublet plus targeted therapy may attain conversion in some cases and may even result in cure. Rectal cancer treatment continues to be a complex disease in terms of treatment and oncological results. Recent data seem to showcase the benefits of more prolonged sequential strategies (total neoadjuvant therapy, all treatment delivered before surgery, to reduce the risk of distant metastases and local control). In recent years, different strategies regarding treatment intensity have been employed in CRC in adjuvant and metastatic setting. Introduction of triplets as first-line therapy for colon cancer and as induction phase for rectal cancer are now therapeutic options. Conversely in stage II disease or low-risk stage III resected CRC, a reduced chemotherapy length is a new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Damato
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL (Unità Sanitaria Locale) - IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCs Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCs Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Luciani
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
An International Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating the Long-term Oncological Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ypN+ Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 277:299-304. [PMID: 36305301 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the oncological benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in node positive (ypN+) rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery. BACKGROUND The evidence for AC after total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer is conflicting and the net survival benefit is debated. METHODS An international multicenter comparative cohort study was performed comparing oncological outcomes in tertiary rectal cancer centers from the Netherlands and France. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision surgery and with positive lymph nodes on histologic examination (ypN+) were included for analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall survival in AC and non-AC groups. RESULTS Of 1265 patients screened, a total of 239 rectal cancer patients with ypN+ disease were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Higher systemic recurrence rates were observed in the non-AC group compared with those who received AC [32.0% (n=40) vs 17.5% (n=11), respectively, P =0.034]. DFS at 1 and 5 years postoperatively were significantly better in the AC group (92% vs 80% at 1 year; 72% vs 51% at 5 years, P =0.024), whereas no difference in overall survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter comparative cohort study, we identified an oncological benefit of AC in both systemic recurrence and DFS in ypN+ rectal cancer patients. From this data, systemic chemotherapy continues to confer oncological benefit in locally advanced ypN+ rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
45
|
Keilson JM, Gamboa AC, Turgeon MK, Maguire L, Hrebinko K, Holder-Murray J, Wiseman JT, Ejaz A, Hawkins AT, Otegbeye E, Silviera M, Maithel SK, Balch GC. Is There a Role for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pathologic Node-Negative Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:224-232. [PMID: 36269446 PMCID: PMC10560584 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12432-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT, 5-fluorouracil and radiation) followed by resection and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is one of the standard treatment paradigms for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. However, the utility of AC in patients with pathologic lymph node (pLN)-negative disease is unclear. Our aim is to assess the value of AC stratified by pLN status. METHODS The US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR) and curative-intent resection. Those who received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy or underwent local resection were excluded. Patients were categorized by pLN status. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 213 patients, 70% had pLN-negative disease and 30% pLN-positive disease. Median age was 57 years, 65% were male, and median follow-up was 31 months. Among patients with pLN-negative disease, 74% received AC. Receipt of AC was not associated with improved 5-year OS (82% versus 74%, respectively; p = 0.16). This finding persisted on multivariable analysis. Of patients with pLN-positive disease, 83% received AC. Patients with pLN-positive disease demonstrated improved 5-year OS with receipt of AC (72% compared with 0% with no adjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION After receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pLN-negative disease does not appear to be associated with improved survival. Further validation and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the utility of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Keilson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael K Turgeon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lillias Maguire
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Katherine Hrebinko
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Holder-Murray
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jason T Wiseman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ebunoluwa Otegbeye
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew Silviera
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Glen C Balch
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
O'Brien TN, Shahrokni A, Horgan AM. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for rectal cancer: Totally Not Translatable to the older patient? J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101348. [PMID: 35882578 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N O'Brien
- Medical Oncology Dept., University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Waterford, Ireland.
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Dept. of Medicine/Geriatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anne M Horgan
- Medical Oncology Dept., University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Waterford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Farzaneh CA, Pigazzi A, Duong WQ, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Dekhordi-Vakil F, Dayyani F, Zell JA, Jafari MD. Analysis of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:35-42. [PMID: 36042105 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02676-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection has been the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing of AC for rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of AC timing on overall survival for rectal cancer. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016 was queried for primary clinical stage II or III rectal cancer patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and AC. Patients were grouped based on AC initiation: early ≤ 4 weeks, intermediate 4-8 weeks, and delayed ≥ 8 weeks. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS We identified 8722 patients, of which 905 (10.4%) received early AC, 4621 (53.0%) intermediate AC, and 3196 (36.6%) delayed AC. Pathological lymph-node metastasis (ypN +) was positive in 73% of early AC, 74% intermediate AC, and 63% delayed AC (p < 0.05). The 5-year survival probability was 71.1% (95% CI 68-74%) for early AC, 73.2% (95% CI 72-75%) intermediate AC, and 65.8% (95% CI 64-68%) delayed AC (p < 0.001). Using Cox proportional hazard modeling, patients undergoing delayed AC had an associated decreased survival compared to patients receiving early AC (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.028-1.353, p = 0.018) or intermediate AC (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.179-1.395, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Delay in AC administration may be associated with decreased 5-year survival. Compared to early or intermediate AC, patients in the delayed AC group were observed to have increased risk of death, despite having lower proportions with ypN + disease. Patients with higher socioeconomic and education status were more likely to receive early chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Farzaneh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - A Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell College of Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, Box #172, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - W Q Duong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - J C Carmichael
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - M J Stamos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - F Dekhordi-Vakil
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - F Dayyani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - J A Zell
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - M D Jafari
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell College of Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, Box #172, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Strategies to Optimize Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010219. [PMID: 36612213 PMCID: PMC9818694 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant long-course concurrent chemoradiation plus surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy, is a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, this traditional approach has several limitations, including low pathological complete response (pCR) (10-25%), high metastasis rate (30-35%), and highly inconsistent compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy (25-75%). Treatment modalities for LARC have dramatically evolved in recent years. Multiple clinical trials have focused on optimizing strategies to achieve a win-win situation for oncologic outcomes and functions. Here, we review the latest studies into optimizing neoadjuvant treatment for LARC.
Collapse
|
49
|
Kuo YH, Lin YT, Ho CH, Chou CL, Cheng LC, Tsai CJ, Hong WJ, Chen YC, Yang CC. Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in rectal cancer patients with good response (ypT0-2N0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A retrospective nationwide analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1087778. [PMID: 36591443 PMCID: PMC9800595 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1087778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For rectal cancer, it remains unclear how to incorporate tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) when deciding whether to give adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we aim to determinate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients with good response (ypT0-2N0) after nCRT and surgery. Methods The study cohort included 720 rectal cancer patients who had good response (ypT0-2N0) after nCRT and surgery, who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2007 and December 2017, from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research database. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis were performed to investigate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Of 720 patients, 368 (51.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 352 (48.9%) did not. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to be female, younger (≤ 65), with advanced clinical T (3-4)/N (1-2) classification and ypT2 classification. No significant difference in 5-year OS (p=0.681) or DFS (p=0.942) were observed by receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Multivariable analysis revealed adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.03; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.88-1.21) or DFS (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Stratified analysis for OS and DFS found no significant protective effect in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, even for those with advanced clinical T or N classification. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy may be omitted in rectal cancer patients with good response (ypT0-2N0) after nCRT and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsuan Kuo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan,Department of Cosmetic Science, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Tzu Lin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Han Ho
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan,Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lin Chou
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan,Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chin Cheng
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Jen Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ju Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chen Chen
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan,*Correspondence: Ching-Chieh Yang,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zimmermann M, Richter A, Weick S, Exner F, Mantel F, Diefenhardt M, Fokas E, Kosmala R, Flentje M, Polat B. Acute toxicities of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with intensified chemoradiotherapy within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial: comparing conventional versus VMAT planning at a single center. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21263. [PMID: 36481692 PMCID: PMC9731986 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25647-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is regarded as standard treatment. We assessed acute toxicities in patients receiving conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT) and correlated them with dosimetric parameters after re-planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Patients were randomized within the multicenter CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial and received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and simultaneous chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Organs at risk (OAR) were contoured in a standardized approach. Acute toxicities and dose volume histogram parameters of 3D-RT plans were compared to retrospectively calculated VMAT plans. From 08/2015 to 01/2018, 35 patients with LARC were treated at one study center. Thirty-four patients were analyzed of whom 1 (3%) was UICC stage II and 33 (97%) patients were UICC stage III. Grade 3 acute toxicities occurred in 5 patients (15%). Patients with acute grade 1 cystitis (n = 9) had significantly higher Dmean values for bladder (29.4 Gy vs. 25.2 Gy, p < 0.01) compared to patients without bladder toxicities. Acute diarrhea was associated with small bowel volume (grade 2: 870.1 ccm vs. grade 0-1: 647.3 ccm; p < 0.01) and with the irradiated volumes V5 to V50. Using VMAT planning, we could reduce mean doses and irradiated volumes for all OAR: Dmean bladder (21.9 Gy vs. 26.3 Gy, p < 0.01), small bowel volumes V5-V45 (p < 0.01), Dmean anal sphincter (34.6 Gy vs. 35.6 Gy, p < 0.01) and Dmean femoral heads (right 11.4 Gy vs. 25.9 Gy, left 12.5 Gy vs. 26.6 Gy, p < 0.01). Acute small bowel and bladder toxicities were dose and volume dependent. Dose and volume sparing for all OAR could be achieved through VMAT planning and might result in less acute toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Zimmermann
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anne Richter
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Weick
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Florian Exner
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Frederick Mantel
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Markus Diefenhardt
- grid.411088.40000 0004 0578 8220Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- grid.411088.40000 0004 0578 8220Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rebekka Kosmala
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|