Vandetanib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer-harboring RET rearrangement: a phase II clinical trial

Precision nanomedicine to treat non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, being often detected at a later stage due to the non-appearance of early symptoms. Therefore, specificity of the treatment is of utmost importance for its effective treatment. Precision medicine is a personalized therapy based on the genomics of the patient to design a suitable drug approach. Genetic mutations render the tumor resistant to specific mutations and the therapy is in vain even though correct medications are prescribed. Therefore, Precision medicine needs to be explored for the treatment of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nanoparticles are widely explored to give personalized interventions to treat lung cancer due to their various advantages like the ability to reach cancer cells, enhanced permeation through tissues, specificity, increased bioavailability, etc. Various nanoparticles (NPs) including gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, aptamer-based NPs etc. were conjugated with biomarkers/diagnostic agents specific to cancer type and were delivered. Various biomarker genes have been identified through precision techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC like EGFR, RET, KRAS, ALK, ROS-1, NTRK-1, etc. By incorporating of drug with the nanoparticle through bioconjugation, the specificity of the treatment can be enhanced with this revolutionary treatment. Additionally, integration of theranostic cargos in the nanoparticle would allow diagnosis as well as treatment by targeting the site of disease progression. Therefore, to target NSCLC effectively precision nanomedicine has been adopted in recent times. Here, we present different nanoparticles that are used as precision nanomedicine and their effectiveness against NSCLC disease.

Exposure-Response Relationships for Pralsetinib in Patients with RET-Altered Thyroid Cancer or RET Fusion-Positive Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Pralsetinib is a highly potent oral kinase inhibitor of oncogenic RET (rearranged during transfection) fusions and mutations. Pralsetinib received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer. Exposure-response (ER) analyses of efficacy were performed separately in patients with thyroid cancer and in patients with NSCLC, but data for all patients were pooled for the safety analysis. ER models were developed with time-varying exposure; the effect of covariates was also examined. For patients with NSCLC, a higher starting dose was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), but this improvement did not correlate with a higher exposure overall. Significant covariates included sex and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. For patients with thyroid cancer, a higher exposure was associated with improved PFS. Significant covariates included prior systemic cancer therapy and ECOG score. For safety, higher exposure was associated with a greater risk of grade ≥3 anemia, pneumonia, and lymphopenia. Patients with an ECOG score of ≥1 had an increased risk of grade ≥3 pneumonia. Non-White patients had a lower risk of grade ≥3 lymphopenia. ER analysis revealed that higher pralsetinib exposure was associated with improved PFS in thyroid cancer, but not in NSCLC. However, a higher starting dose (ie, 400 vs ≤300 mg daily) was correlated with better PFS for all indications. Higher exposure was also associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs); however, the overall incidence of these events was acceptably low (≤20%). This analysis supports the use of a 400 mg starting dose of pralsetinib, allowing for dose reduction in the event of AEs.

Drug repositioning in thyroid cancer: from point mutations to gene fusions

The diagnosis of thyroid cancer (TC) has increased dramatically in recent years. Papillary TC is the most frequent type and has shown a good prognosis. Conventional treatments for TC are surgery, hormonal therapy, radioactive iodine, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, resistance to treatments is well documented in almost 20% of all cases. Genomic sequencing has provided valuable information to help identify variants that hinder the success of chemotherapy as well as to determine which of those represent potentially druggable targets. There is a plethora of targeted therapies for cancer, most of them directed toward point mutations; however, chromosomal rearrangements that generate fusion genes are becoming relevant in cancer but have been less explored in TC. Therefore, it is relevant to identify new potential inhibitors for genes that are recurrent in the formation of gene fusions. In this review, we focus on describing potentially druggable variants and propose both point variants and fusion genes as targets for drug repositioning in TC.

Targeting RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer

Rearranged during transfection (RET) alterations, which lead to aberrant activation of the RET proto-oncogene, have been identified in various cancers. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET mutations often manifest as RET fusion genes and are observed in 1-2 % of patients with NSCLC. In recent years, selective RET inhibitors such as selpercatinib and pralsetinib, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020, have been part of the revolutionary changes in the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer. While first-generation RET inhibitors have become part of the standard of care for RET-fusion positive NSCLC, a new challenge has emerged: acquired resistance to RET inhibitors. RET resistance is a complex phenomenon that can manifest as either on-target or off-target resistance. Numerous studies have been conducted to identify the mechanisms behind this resistance. This review provides an overview of the biology of RET in NSCLC, methods of RET testing, and a comprehensive analysis of the clinical outcomes associated with multikinase and selective RET inhibitors for NSCLC. Additionally, we will explore future perspectives for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, including ongoing trials and the challenges involved in overcoming resistance to RET inhibitors.

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in metastatic RET-mutated lung cancer from real-world retrospective data

BACKGROUND

The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based treatments on non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with RET fusions remains poorly understood.

METHODS

We screened patients with RET fusions at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and included those who were treated with ICIs based regimens for further analysis. We evaluated clinical indicators including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients with RET fusions were included in the study. Of these, 129 patients had their programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) expression levels tested, with 22 patients (17.8%) having a PDL1 level greater than or equal to 50%. Additionally, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status was evaluated in 35 patients, with the majority (30/35, 85.8%) having a TMB of less than 10 mutations per megabase. Out of the 38 patients treated with ICI based regimens, the median PFS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-7.6 months) and the median OS was 19 months (95% CI: 9.7-28.3 months) at the time of data analysis. Stratification based on treatment lines did not show any significant differences in OS (18 vs. 19 months, p = 0.63) and PFS (6 vs. 5 months, p = 0.86). The ORR for patients treated with ICIs was 26.3%. Furthermore, no significant differences were found for PFS (p = 0.27) and OS (p = 0.75) between patients with positive and negative PDL1 expression. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PD-L1 levels (p = 0.10) between patients who achieved objective response and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RET fusion positive NSCLCs may not benefit from ICI based regimens and therefore should not be treated with ICIs in clinical practice.

Real-world outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy and selective RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion is a target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and RET inhibitors are approved for advanced NSCLC. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of ICIs and RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

Methods

Data from patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021 were analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ICIs and RET inhibitors treatments were collected.

Results

Seventy-five patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC were identified. The median age of patients was 57 years, half of the patients were female (50.3%), and most were non-smokers or light smokers (72%). Of the cancer types diagnosed in study patients, the KIF5B-RET fusion subtype accounted for 73.3% (55/75), twelve patients (16%) had CCDC6-RET fusion, and three (4%) had NCOA4-RET fusion. Sixteen patients were treated with ICIs. In previously untreated patients, we observed an objective response rate (ORR) of 71.4% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 7.5 months in seven assessable patients. Of four patients with PD-L1 overexpression (>50%) one received pembrolizumab and the other three patients received pemetrexed, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab. In these patients, the ORR was 75% and disease control rate was 100%. Fifteen patients received selective RET inhibitors (pralsetinib and selpercatinib), resulting in an ORR of 53.3% (8/15) and median PFS of 10.0 months (95% CI 5.2-14.9).

Conclusions

ICIs for PD-L overexpression and treatment naive patients offer comparable benefits for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, warranting further investigation.

Path Less Traveled: Targeting Rare Driver Oncogenes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Over the past decade, tremendous efforts have been made in the development of targeted agents in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nonsquamous histology. Pivotal studies have used next-generation sequencing to select the patient population harboring oncogenic driver alterations that are targetable with targeted therapies. As treatment paradigm rapidly evolves for patients with rare oncogene-driven NSCLC, updated comprehensive overview of diagnostic approach and treatment options is paramount in clinical settings. In this review article, we discuss the epidemiology, molecular testing, and landmark clinical trials addressing the targeted agents for ROS1 rearrangement, METex14 skipping mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertion, KRAS G12C mutation, HER2 mutation, RET fusion, NTRK fusion, and BRAF mutations.

Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pralsetinib is a potent, selective RET inhibitor targeting oncogenic RET alterations. As part of the global, phase 1/2 ARROW trial (NCT03037385), the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in Chinese patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated.

METHODS

Adult patients with advanced, RET fusion-positive NSCLC with or without prior platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into two cohorts receiving 400-mg once-daily oral pralsetinib. Primary end points were objective response rates assessed by blinded independent central review and safety.

RESULTS

Of 68 patients enrolled, 37 had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy (48.6% with ≥3 prior systemic regimens) and 31 were treatment-naïve. As of March 4, 2022 (data cutoff), of the patients with measurable lesions at baseline, a confirmed objective response was observed in 22 (66.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.2-82.0) of 33 pretreated patients, including 1 (3.0%) complete response and 21 (63.6%) partial responses; and in 25 (83.3%; 95% CI, 65.3-94.4) of 30 treatment-naïve patients, including two (6.7%) complete responses and 23 (76.7%) partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.7-not estimable) in pretreated patients and 12.7 months (95% CI, 8.9-not estimable) in treatment-naïve patients. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events in 68 patients were anemia (35.3%) and decreased neutrophil count (33.8%). Eight (11.8%) patients discontinued pralsetinib because of treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Pralsetinib showed robust and durable clinical activity with a well-tolerated safety profile in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03037385.

Analysis of rare fusions in NSCLC: Genomic architecture and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

Molecular diagnosis for targeted therapies has been improved significantly in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in recent years. Here we report on the prevalence of rare fusions in NSCLC and dissect their genomic architecture and potential clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, n = 5554 NSCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) for combined detection of oncogenic mutations and fusions either at primary diagnosis (n = 5246) or after therapy resistance (n = 308). Panels of different sizes were employed with closed amplicon-based, or open assays, i.e. anchored multiplex PCR (AMP) and hybrid capture-based, for detection of translocations, including "rare" fusions, defined as those beyond ALK, ROS1, RET and <0.5 % frequency in NSCLC.

RESULTS

Rare fusions involving EGFR, MET, HER2, BRAF and other potentially actionable oncogenes were detected in 0.5% (n = 26) of therapy-naive and 2% (n = 6) TKI-treated tumors. Detection was increased using open assays and/or larger panels, especially those covering >25 genes, by approximately 1-2% (p = 0.001 for both). Patient characteristics (age, gender, smoking, TP53 co-mutations (56%), or mean tumor mutational burden (TMB) (4.8 mut/Mb)) showed no association with presence of rare fusions. Non-functional alterations, i.e. out-of-frame or lacking kinase domains, comprised one-third of detected rare fusions and were significantly associated with simultaneous presence of classical oncogenic drivers, e.g. EGFR or KRAS mutations (p < 0.001), or use of larger panels (frequency of non-functional among the detected rare fusions 57% for 25+ gene- vs. 12% for smaller panels, p < 0.001). As many rare fusions were identified before availability of targeted therapy, mean survival for therapy-naïve patients was 23.8 months, comparable with wild-type tumors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1-2% of advanced NSCLC harbor rare fusions, which are potentially actionable and may support diagnosis. Routine adoption of broad NGS assays capable to identify exact fusion points and potentially retained protein domains can increase the yield of therapeutically relevant molecular information in advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of RET-Specific Kinase Inhibitors in RET-Altered Cancers: A Systematic Review

RET proto-oncogene encodes receptor tyrosine kinase. Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are the only RET-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved by FDA in RET-altered tumors. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, WOS, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Objective-response, complete-response, and partial-response were 60-89%, 0-11%, and 55-89%, respectively, with the use of RET-specific drugs. ≥Grade 3 adverse events were seen in 28-53% of the patients, with hypertension, change in ALT, QT prolongation, neutropenia, and pneumonitis among the common side effects. Hence, selpercatinib and pralsetinib were effective and well tolerated by most of the patients with RET-altered tumors.

RET-Altered Cancers-A Tumor-Agnostic Review of Biology, Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy Activity

RET alterations, such as fusions or mutations, drive the growth of multiple tumor types. These alterations are found in canonical (lung and thyroid) and non-canonical (e.g., gastrointestinal, breast, gynecological, genitourinary, histiocytic) cancers. RET alterations are best identified via comprehensive next-generation sequencing, preferably with DNA and RNA interrogation for fusions. Targeted therapies for RET-dependent cancers have evolved from older multikinase inhibitors to selective inhibitors of RET such as selpercatinib and pralsetinib. Prospective basket trials and retrospective reports have demonstrated the activity of these drugs in a wide variety of RET-altered cancers, notably those with RET fusions. This paved the way for the first tumor-agnostic selective RET inhibitor US FDA approval in 2022. Acquired resistance to RET kinase inhibitors can take the form of acquired resistance mutations (e.g., RET G810X) or bypass alterations.

Pathological characteristics and tumour immune microenvironment of lung malignancies with RET rearrangement

BACKGROUND

For patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited. The characteristics of the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) and molecular pathological features of these patients have not been well elucidated. We aimed to investigate their clinical outcomes and explore characteristics of TIME, using multiplex immunohistochemistry technology (mIHC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The pathology and TIME characteristics of 29 patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement were retrospectively analysed, and their relationships with clinical efficacy and prognosis were investigated. Gene detection relied on high-throughput sequencing, and TIME detection was based on mIHC.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients, 25(86%) had adenocarcinoma, and the acinar type accounted for the greatest percentage of patients, followed by the solid type, regardless of whether the disease was early or locally advanced and metastatic. In addition, we report a novel KIF5B-RET(k24:R8) rearrangement in pulmonary sarcoma. The density of CD8+ T cells in tumour stroma in early-stage patients was significantly higher than that in locally advanced and metastatic patients (P = 0.014). The proportion of M2 macrophages in tumour stroma was significantly higher than that in tumour parenchyma (P = 0.046). Although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.098), patients positive for M2 macrophage infiltration into the tumour parenchyma (≥5%) may have a better prognosis. Seven patients received immunotherapy and disease control rate was 85.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel KIF5B-RET rearrangement variant in pulmonary sarcoma shows similar TIME characteristics to lung cancer. amongst patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement, patients with M2 macrophage infiltration into the tumour parenchyma may have a better prognosis, but further studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer

Oncogenes that occur in ≤5% of non-small-cell lung cancers have been defined as 'rare'; nonetheless, this frequency can correspond to a substantial number of patients diagnosed annually. Within rare oncogenes, less commonly identified alterations (such as HRAS, NRAS, RIT1, ARAF, RAF1 and MAP2K1 mutations, or ERBB family, LTK and RASGRF1 fusions) can share certain structural or oncogenic features with more commonly recognized alterations (such as KRAS, BRAF, MET and ERBB family mutations, or ALK, RET and ROS1 fusions). Over the past 5 years, a surge in the identification of rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers has challenged the boundaries of traditional clinical grade diagnostic assays and profiling algorithms. In tandem, the number of approved targeted therapies for patients with rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer has risen dramatically. Rational drug design has iteratively improved the quality of small-molecule therapeutic agents and introduced a wave of antibody-based therapeutics, expanding the list of actionable de novo and resistance alterations in lung cancer. Getting additional molecularly tailored therapeutics approved for rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers in a larger range of countries will require ongoing stakeholder cooperation. Patient advocates, health-care agencies, investigators and companies with an interest in diagnostics, therapeutics and real-world evidence have already taken steps to surmount the challenges associated with research into low-frequency drivers.

Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with RET Fusions: Reality and Hopes

RET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have revolutionized the landscape of RET-positive (RET+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, thanks to their efficacy and safety profiles. This class of medications currently represents the standard of care for both naïve and patients that have not received selective RET-TKIs in the first-line setting. However, we presently lack a satisfactory understanding of resistance mechanism developing after selective RET-TKIs usage, as well as a specific treatment for patients progressing on selpercatinib or pralsetinib. Chemotherapy ± immunotherapy is considered as a recommended subsequent second-line regimen in these patients. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to better define and understand the resistance mechanisms triggered by RET-TKIs. With this in mind, the present review article has been conceived to provide a comprehensive overview about RET+ advanced NSCLC, both from a therapeutic and molecular point of view. Besides comparing the clinical outcome achieved in RET+ advanced NSCLC patients after multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) and/or RET-selective TKIs' administration, we focused on the molecular mechanisms accountable for their long-term resistance. Finally, a critical perspective on many of today's most debated issues and concerns is provided, with the purpose of shaping the possible pharmacological approaches for tomorrow's therapies.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of a Driving Target: RET Rearrangements in non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Especially in China

In the era of precision medicine, with the deepening of the research on malignant tumor driving genes, clinical oncology has fully entered the era of targeted therapy. For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the development of targeted drugs targeting driver genes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has successfully opened up a new model of targeted therapy. At present, proto-oncogene rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion gene is an important novel oncogenic driving target, and specific receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting RET fusion have been approved. This article will review the latest research about the molecular characteristics, pathogenesis, detection, and clinical treatment strategies of RET rearrangements especially in China.

Targeted therapy of RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer has very high morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the prognosis is not optimistic. Previous treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have limited efficacy, and targeted drugs for some gene mutations have been used in NSCLC with considerable efficacy. The RET proto-oncogene is located on the long arm of chromosome 10 with a length of 60,000 bp, and the expression of RET gene affects cell survival, proliferation, growth and differentiation. This review will describe the basic characteristics and common fusion methods of RET genes; analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different RET fusion detection methods; summarize and discuss the recent application of non-selective and selective RET fusion-positive inhibitors, such as Vandetanib, Selpercatinib, Pralsetinib and Alectinib; discuss the mechanism and coping strategies of resistance to RET fusion-positive inhibitors.

Precious Gene: The Application of RET-Altered Inhibitors

The well-known proto-oncogene rearrangement during transfection (RET), also known as ret proto-oncogene Homo sapiens (human), is a rare gene that is involved in the physiological development of some organ systems and can activate various cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and papillary thyroid cancer. In the past few years, cancers with RET alterations have been treated with multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). However, because of off-target effects, these MKIs have developed drug resistance and some unacceptable adverse effects. Therefore, these MKIs are limited in their clinical application. Thus, the novel highly potent and RET-specific inhibitors selpercatinib and pralsetinib have been accelerated for approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clinical trials of TPX-0046 and zetletinib are underway. It is well tolerated and a potential therapeutic for RET-altered cancers. Thus, we will focus on current state-of-the-art therapeutics with these novel RET inhibitors and show their efficacy and safety in therapy.

Case report: Recurrent lung infections following treatment with pralsetinib for an elderly patient with RET-fusion positive NSCLC

Patients with RET fusions represent 1-2% of all cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of whom are younger, and are extremely rare in the elderly. As a selective RET inhibitor, pralsetinib has been shown to be efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with RET-fusion NSCLC. Nevertheless, there are currently insufficient data available for assessing the activity and safety of pralsetinib in elderly patients with NSCLC. Herein, we report an 81-year-old NSCLC patient with KIF5B-RET fusion, who achieved stable disease for more than 9 months at a low-dose of pralsetinib as second-line therapy. Of particular note, during pralsetinb therapy, his clinical course was complicated by cryptococcal pneumonia and staphylococcus aureus lung abscess. Our study demonstrates that pralsetinib is an effective therapeutic option that provides survival benefits for elderly NSCLC patients harboring RET fusion. However, during pralsetinb therapy, treating physicians should maintain particular vigilance for the increased risk of infection, especially in elderly patients.

Pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world data (RWD) analysis from the Italian expanded access program (EAP)

OBJECTIVES

The selective RET-inhibitor pralsetinib has shown therapeutic activity in early clinical trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions. To date, the real-world efficacy of pralsetinib in this population is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective efficacy and safety analysis was performed on data from patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC enrolled in the pralsetinib Italian expanded access program between July 2019 and October 2021.

RESULTS

Overall, 62 patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC received pralsetinib at 20 Italian centers. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect RET alterations in 44 patients (73 %). The most frequent gene fusion partner was KIF5B (75 % of 45 evaluable). Median age was 62 years (range, 36-90), most patients were female (57 %) and never smokers (53 %). Brain metastases were known in 18 patients (29.5 %) at the time of pralsetinib treatment. 13 patients were treatment naïve (unfit for chemotherapy), 48 were pretreated (median number of previous lines: 1, range, 1-4). The objective response rate (ORR) was 66 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 53-81] in the evaluable population (n = 59). The disease control rate (DCR) was 79 %. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median progression free survival was 8.9 months (95 %CI, 4.7-NA). In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 6) intracranial ORR was 83 %, intracranial DCR was 100 %. Overall, 83.6 % of patients experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 39 % grade 3 or greater (G ≥ 3). The most common G ≥ 3 TRAEs were neutropenia (9.8 %), dry mouth/oral mucositis (8.2 %), and thrombocytopenia (6.6 %). Seven patients (12 %) discontinued pralsetinib due to TRAEs, twenty-six had at least one dose level modification due to TRAEs. Two treatment-related deaths were observed (1 sepsis, 1 typhlitis).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world setting, pralsetinib confirmed durable systemic activity and intracranial response in RET-fusion positive NSCLC. Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Biomarker-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignancies and the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite many therapeutic advances in the past decade, NSCLC remains an incurable disease for the majority of patients. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of NSCLC. However, the vast majority of advanced NSCLC develop resistance to current therapies and eventually progress. In this review, we discuss current and potential therapies for NSCLC, focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We highlight the future role of metabolic therapies and combination therapies in NSCLC.

An integrative pan cancer analysis of RET aberrations and their potential clinical implications

RET (rearranged during transfection), encoding a tyrosine kinase receptor, is a novel therapeutic target for cancers. The aberrations of RET are commonly found in cancers. Here, we profiled a comprehensive genomic landscape of RET mutations, copy number variants (CNVs), co-occurrence of RET and its mRNA expression and methylation levels in pan cancer, paving the way to the development of new RET-targeted therapies in clinic. Analysis of RET somatic mutations, CNVs, co-occurrence, mRNA expression and methylation were performed among 32 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset covering a total of 10,953 patients with 10,967 samples. RET aberrations were found in 3.0% of diverse cancers. The top two RET-altered tumors were skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) with dominant mutations in the other and PKinase_Tyr domains. RET-G823E and RET-S891L were most commonly found in SKCM and UCEC. Thyroid carcinoma (THCA) demonstrated the highest rate of coiled-coil domain containing 6 (CCDC6)-RET fusions, which constitutively activate RET kinase. Two FDA-approved RET inhibitors—pralsetinib and selpercatinib have been implied for the treatment of patients with RET S891L mutant UCEC and the treatment of patients with metastatic RET-fusion positive THCA and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at therapeutic level 1. We also identified four RET M918T-altered cases in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PCPG), which may induce drug resistance against multikinase inhibitors. Next, 273 co-occurring aberrations, most frequently in Notch signaling, TGF-β pathway, cell cycle, and Ras-Raf-MEK-Erk/JNK signaling, were uncovered among 311 RET altered cases. TP53 mutations (162 patients) leads to the most significant co-occurrence associated with RET aberrations. Furthermore, the RET expression was found most significantly increased in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), as compared to their corresponding normal tissues. At last, patients with higher expression and sequence variant frequency have a worse prognosis, such as sarcoma patients. This work provided a profound and comprehensive analysis of RET and co-occurred alterations, RET mRNA expression and the clinical significance in pan cancer, offering new insights into targeted therapy for patients with RET anomalies.

Alectinib for the treatment of pretreated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC: Results of the ETOP ALERT-lung trial

BACKGROUND

Alectinib, a highly selective next generation ALK-inhibitor, has exhibited potent anti-tumour activity in RET-rearranged NSCLC in the preclinical stage.

METHODS

ALERT-lung is a single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the activity of alectinib for the treatment of pretreated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC. Alectinib was administered orally, 600 mg, twice per day until progression, refusal or unacceptable toxicity (treatment could continue beyond progression, if patient was deriving clinical benefit). Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to discouraging results for alectinib in a phase I/II study in the same indication.

RESULTS

All 14 patients who enrolled until the premature accrual closure, received at lease one dose of alectinib. Among them, median age was 61 years, majority (71 %) was female, never smokers, of ECOG PS 1. No objective response (complete or partial response) was recorded. Of the 13 evaluable patients, three (23 %) achieved and maintained disease stabilisation for 24 weeks. Up to 31 March 2021 (median follow-up 15.9 months), 12 PFS-events (92 %) were observed, with median PFS of 3.7 months (95 % C.I.: 1.8 - 7.3 months). Overall, three deaths (23 %) were reported. Seven patients (50 %) experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while three discontinued treatment due to erythema multiforme of grade 3, related to alectinib. No treatment-related serious adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Accrual into our trial was terminated early in response to other reports of limited activity of alectinib in patients with RET-fusion NSCLC and the emergence of more potent selective RET-inhibitors. Also in our trial, alectinib did not show the expected potential for anti-tumour activity in NSCLC.

Pulmonary toxicity in driver gene positive non-small cell lung cancer therapy

Molecular targeted therapy significantly improved the therapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with driver gene mutations but also with new toxicity profiles. Although most patients treated with these drugs developed relatively controllable toxicity, significant pulmonary toxicity events, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in a small proportion of patients and can lead to discontinuation or even be life-threatening. Pulmonary toxicity associated with these anti-tumor drugs is a problem that cannot be ignored in clinical practice. The prompt diagnosis of drug-related lung injury and the consequent differential diagnosis with other forms of pulmonary disease are critical in the management of pulmonary toxicity. Current knowledge of the pathophysiology and management of pulmonary toxicity associated with these targeted drugs is limited, and participants should be able to identify and respond to the development of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity. This review offers information about the potential pathogenesis, risk factors and management for the development of these events based on the available literature. This review focused on pulmonary toxicities in driver gene-positive NSCLC therapy by describing the related adverse events to promote the awareness and management of this important toxicity related to antitumor-targeted therapy.

Techniques for Profiling the Cellular Immune Response and Their Implications for Interventional Oncology

In recent years there has been increased interest in using the immune contexture of the primary tumors to predict the patient's prognosis. The tumor microenvironment of patients with cancers consists of different types of lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, dendritic cells, and others. Different technologies can be used for the evaluation of the tumor microenvironment, all of which require a tissue or cell sample. Image-guided tissue sampling is a cornerstone in the diagnosis, stratification, and longitudinal evaluation of therapeutic efficacy for cancer patients receiving immunotherapies. Therefore, interventional radiologists (IRs) play an essential role in the evaluation of patients treated with systemically administered immunotherapies. This review provides a detailed description of different technologies used for immune assessment and analysis of the data collected from the use of these technologies. The detailed approach provided herein is intended to provide the reader with the knowledge necessary to not only interpret studies containing such data but also design and apply these tools for clinical practice and future research studies.

Selective RET inhibitors shift the treatment pattern of RET fusion-positive NSCLC and improve survival outcomes

PURPOSE

Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are important genetic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective RET inhibitors are setting a new paradigm in RET-driven NSCLC. However, the real-world treatment patterns, outcomes and toxicity remain largely unknown.

METHODS

Data from RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients treated in our centre were retrospectively analysed. Of them, patients diagnosed before and after August 2018 were included in analysis of treatment patterns; and patients received selective RET inhibitors were eligible for analysis of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Patients diagnosed before August 2018 (n = 30) predominantly received chemotherapy and immunotherapy (83%) as initial therapy, while patients diagnosed after August 2018 (n = 39) mainly received selective RET inhibitors (38.5% at first-line; 50.0% at second-line). In the total 69 patients, overall survival (OS) was prolonged in patients treated with selective RET inhibitors versus untreated patients (median 34.3 versus 17.5 months; p = 0.002) during a median follow-up of 28.7 months. But there was no difference between patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients. In the 38 patients received selective RET inhibition, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.9 months. AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 42.1% patients and were not associated with PFS (p = 0.63) or OS (p = 0.60). Haematological toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 31.6% patients and was the leading cause of drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Selective RET inhibitors are increasingly being adopted into clinical practice and are associated with improved OS. However, treatment-related ≥ grade 3 AEs, especially haematologic AEs, occur frequently in real-world setting.

Selpercatinib in RET-fusion positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: achievements and gray areas

INTRODUCTION

Selpercatinib is a RET selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor with nanomolar potency against diverse RET alterations, including fusions, activating point mutations, and acquired resistance mutations. Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is a validated target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selpercatinib is currently approved for adult patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the efficacy and safety data of selpercatinib in the treatment landscape of RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Globally considered, selpercatinib is an optimal treatment choice, in terms of both (systemic and intracranial) efficacy and safety, in patients affected by advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusions as a driver mechanism. Future challenges include the identification of the most appropriate placement for selpercatinib in the treatment algorithm of RET fusion-positive NSCLC (including early stages), the clarification of resistance mechanisms, as well as of its role in EGFR-mutant NSCLC undergoing progression during osimertinib driven by RET alterations.

The Treatment Status of Patients in NSCLC With RET Fusion Under the Prelude of Selective RET-TKI Application in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Research

Background

Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion is a kind of uncommon mutation (about 1%) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (selpercatinib and pralsetinib) have been available, there are no real-world data about the difference in the efficacy between RET-TKI and other regimens in China.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 49 patients with RET-fusion-positive NSCLC. The characteristics and the clinical outcomes with RET-TKI, multi-kinase inhibitor (MKI), systematic chemotherapy, and immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens were evaluated.

Results

Of the 92 treatments in patients included, RET-TKI was administered 24 times (26.1%), systematic chemotherapy was 35 times (38.0%), ICI-based regimens was 26 times (28.3%), and MKI was 7 times (7.6%). RET-TKI had a higher objective response rate than the chemotherapy and ICI-based regimens (63.6% vs. 14.3% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). The median progress-free survival (mPFS) of RET-TKI, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and MKI was 16.9 (95% CI: 1.8–32.0) months, 11.9 (95% CI: 7.7–16.1) months, 6.7 (95% CI: 2.9–10.5) months, and 2.8 (95% CI: 1.1–4.4) months, respectively. The mPFS of RET-TKI was longer than MKI and immunotherapy (p < 0.001), while without difference with chemotherapy (p = 0.096). Moreover, chemotherapy had longer mPFS than MKI (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, patients with brain metastases in RET-TKI treatment had worse mPFS than the one of patients without brain metastases (6.1 (95% CI: 0.0–13.9) months and 8.5 (95% CI: 6.3–10.6) months, p = 0.012). For patients having chemotherapy with or without angiogenesis inhibitors, the mPFS was 12.0 (95% CI: 11.05–13.02) months and 9.1 (95% CI: 8.31–9.89) months (p = 0.468). In the group of ICI-based regimens, the expression level of PD-L1 did not affect the mPFS of ICI [PD-L1 (+) vs. PD-L1 (–): 4.7 (95% CI: 1.8–9.0) months vs. 7.6 (95% CI: 1.1–14.0) months, p = 0.910]. For overall patients, ECOG PS score, therapy lines, and therapeutic regimens were the independent factors affecting the prognosis.

Conclusions

In RET-fusion-positive NSCLC, RET-TKI is the best choice for a better response rate and PFS. In addition, chemotherapy which may bring a good PFS, is still a good choice for this group of patients.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommended management for patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. Patients with metastatic lung cancer who are eligible for targeted therapies or immunotherapies are now surviving longer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on targeted therapies for patients with metastatic NSCLC and actionable mutations.

New horizons for uncommon mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: BRAF, KRAS, RET, MET, NTRK, HER2

The 2004 discovery of EGFR mutations, followed by ALK rearrangements, ushered in a targeted therapy era for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting gene alterations have substantially improved survival and quality of life for patients with NSCLC. In the last decade, rearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene have been incorporated into healthcare practice that are applicable to another small subgroup of patients who benefit from similar targeted strategies. Recent genome studies of lung adenocarcinoma have identified other possible therapeutic targets, including RET, NTRK fusions, c-MET alterations, and activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and HER2, all with frequencies greater than 1%. Lung cancers harbouring these genome changes can potentially be treated with agents approved for other indications or under clinical development. This review updates the therapeutic arsenal that especially targets those genes.

Morphologic-Molecular Transformation of Oncogene Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinomas, harbour at least one oncogenic driver mutation that can potentially be a target for therapy. Treatments of these oncogene-addicted tumours, such as the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of mutated epidermal growth factor receptor, have dramatically improved the outcome of patients. However, some patients may acquire resistance to treatment early on after starting a targeted therapy. Transformations to other histotypes—small cell lung carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma—have been increasingly recognised as important mechanisms of resistance and are increasingly becoming a topic of interest for all specialists involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients. This article, after examining the most used TKI agents and their main biological activities, discusses histological and molecular transformations with an up-to-date review of all previous cases published in the field. Liquid biopsy and future research directions are also briefly discussed to offer the reader a complete and up-to-date overview of the topic.

Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Genomic Profiling to Guide First-Line Targeted Therapy Selection in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 10 oncogenes, targeted gene panel testing (TGPT) of 4 oncogenes, and no tumor profiling over the lifetime for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' perspective was conducted.

METHODS

A decision analytic model used 10 000 hypothetical Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to simulate outcomes associated with CGP (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, ROS1), TGPT (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ROS1), and no tumor profiling (no genes tested). First-line targeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned if actionable gene variants were detected; otherwise, nontargeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned. Model inputs were derived from randomized trials (progression-free survival, adverse events), the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare (drug costs), published studies (nondrug cancer-related management costs, health state utilities), and published databases (actionable variant prevalences). Costs (2019 US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% per year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses used 1000 Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

No tumor profiling was the least costly/person ($122 613 vs $184 063 for TGPT and $188 425 for CGP) and yielded the least QALYs/person (0.53 vs 0.73 for TGPT and 0.74 for CGP). The costs per QALY gained and corresponding 95% confidence interval were $310 735 ($278 323-$347 952) for TGPT vs no tumor profiling and $445 545 ($322 297-$572 084) for CGP vs TGPT. All probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations for both comparisons surpassed the willingness-to-pay threshold ($150 000 per QALY gained).

CONCLUSION

Compared with no tumor profiling in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, tumor profiling (TGPT, CGP) improves quality-adjusted survival but is not cost-effective.

Integrated Analysis of Multi-Omics Data to Identify Prognostic Genes for Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths. Current research shows that prognostic biomarkers play a key role in the treatment of PC. This study aimed to identify prognostic genes through bioinformatics research. We combined data from 175 cases of PC from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database with gene mutation expression, level distribution of methylation, mRNA expression, and through weighted correlation network analysis to nine hub genes. Subsequently, these genes were verified on TCGA and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) platforms. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed to investigate the expression levels of 9 genes in PC cells and cancerous and 30 PC cases and corresponding adjacent tissues. CIBERSORT database analysis was conducted for hub genes. Our findings demonstrated that the 9 genes (MST1R, TMPRSS4, PTK6, KLF5, CGN, ABHD17C, MUC1, CAPN8, and B3GNT3) were prognostic biomarkers of PC identified from the top 10 genes of the 2 coexpression modules. The nine genes were then used to divide early PC cases into two subgroups with significant differences in prognosis and differences in function (digestion, extracellular cell adhesion). Further analysis revealed that the nine genes were highly expressed in PC tissues. In addition, MST1R, PTK6, ABHD17C, and CGN mRNA were expressed high in PC cells and clinical tissues. CIBERSORT analysis indicated that the expression of these genes was closely correlated with naive B cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and M0 macrophages. This suggests that these genes could play a carcinogenic role in the preservation of immune-dominant status for the tumor microenvironment. The nine key genes identified in this study could enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with PC.

Molecular Testing and Treatment Strategies in RET-Rearranged NSCLC Patients: Stay on Target to Look Forward

RET alterations are recognized as key oncogenic drivers in different cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) with anti-RET activities resulted in variable efficacy with significant toxicities because of low target specificity. Selective RET kinase inhibitors, such as pralsetinib and selepercatinib, demonstrated high efficacy and favorable tolerability in advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC patients, leading to their introduction in the clinical setting. Among the different approaches available for the identification of RET rearrangements, next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays present substantial advantages in terms of turnaround time and diagnostic accuracy, even if potentially limited by accessibility issues. The recent advent of novel effective targeted therapies raises several questions regarding the emergence of resistance mechanisms and the potential ways to prevent/overcome them. In this review, we discuss molecular testing and treatment strategies to manage RET fusion positive NSCLC patients with a focus on resistance mechanisms and future perspectives in this rapidly evolving scenario.

Rare driver alterations in nonsmall cell lung cancer: novel targeted drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review presents clinically relevant driver alterations in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the targeted treatments currently available for clinical use as well as those in clinical trials and advanced stages of drug development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, proto-oncogene B-RAF (BRAF), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET) and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are rare genetic driver alterations, each present in a small subset of patients with NSCLC. Treatments targeting BRAF, ROS1, RET and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are approved in Europe, and promising treatments targeting mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are available in clinical trials and compassionate use programs. The response rates, duration of response and tolerability observed in trials of targeted drugs in this setting are presented in detail here.

SUMMARY

While rare driver alterations are, by definition, rare, their recognition can change the course of NSCLC for those patients affected. Targeted treatments for many rare driver alterations are well tolerated and effective. Screening for molecular changes in advanced NSCLC should include screening for rare drivers, and patients should be directed to clinical trials in setting where treatment of the driver alterations is not otherwise available.

[Advances in the Treatment of RET Fusion-positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are found in 0.7% to 2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fusions between RET gene and other domains represent the distinct biological and clinicopathological subtypes of NSCLC. Recent years have witnessed the remarkable advancement of RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC therapy. Conventional chemotherapy produced moderate clinical benefits. Prior to the introduction of targeted therapy or in the context of unavailability, platinum-based systemic regimens are initial therapy options. Immunotherapy predicted minimal response in the presence of RET fusions while currently available data have been scarce, and the single-agent immunotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy regimens are not recommended as initial systemic therapy in this population. The repurpose of multi-target kinase inhibitors in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC showed encouraging therapeutic activity, with only cabozantinib and vandetanib being recommended as initial or subsequent options under certain circumstances. However, there are still unmet clinical needs. Pralsetinib and selpercatinib have been developed as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) selectively targeting RET variation of fusions or mutations, and both agents significantly improved the prognosis of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Pralsetinib and selpercatinib have been established as preferred first-line therapy or subsequent therapy options. As observed with other TKIs treatment, resistance has also been associated with RET targeted inhibition, and the acquired resistance eventually affect the long-term therapeutic effectiveness, leading to limited subsequent treatment options. Therefore, it is essential to identify resistance mechanisms to TKI in RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC to help reveal and establish new strategies to overcome resistance. Here, we review the advances in the treatment of RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC.
.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors-Induced Arrhythmias: From Molecular Mechanisms, Pharmacokinetics to Therapeutic Strategies

With the development of anti-tumor drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are an indispensable part of targeted therapy. They can be superior to traditional chemotherapeutic drugs in selectivity, safety, and efficacy. However, they have been found to be associated with serious adverse effects in use, such as myocardial infarction, fluid retention, hypertension, and rash. Although TKIs induced arrhythmia with a lower incidence than other cardiovascular diseases, much clinical evidence indicated that adequate attention and management should be provided to patients. This review focuses on QT interval prolongation and atrial fibrillation (AF) which are conveniently monitored in clinical practice. We collected data about TKIs, and analyzed the molecule mechanism, discussed the actual clinical evidence and drug-drug interaction, and provided countermeasures to QT interval prolongation and AF. We also pooled data to show that both QT prolongation and AF are related to their multi-target effects. Furthermore, more than 30 TKIs were approved by the FDA, but most of the novel drugs had a small sample size in the preclinical trial and risk/benefit assessments were not perfect, which led to a suspension after listing, like nilotinib. Similarly, vandetanib exhibits the most significant QT prolongation and ibrutinib exhibits the highest incidence in AF, but does not receive enough attention during treatment.

Pralsetinib (Gavreto): Treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in patients positive for RET fusions

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and place in therapy of pralsetinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with RET fusions.

SUMMARY

RET fusion-positive NSCLC is a rare cancer caused by chromosomal rearrangements that lead to fusions of the RET gene with other genes, such as KIF5B and CCDC6. Until recently, patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, because of their nonspecific mechanism of action, these drugs did not have high response rates. In September 2020, the Food and Drug Administration approved pralsetinib (Gavreto), the first once-daily oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Pralsetinib has been demonstrated to have response rates of 57% and 70% in patients who were previously treated with platinum chemotherapy and patients who were treatment naive, respectively. Clinicians using pralsetinib should monitor for liver-related adverse events, hypertension, myelosuppression, pyrexia, sepsis, gastrointestinal symptoms, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and pneumonia, as these may require treatment interruption, dose reduction, or treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Pralsetinib is a unique targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who may desire a once-daily regimen. The recent approval of pralsetinib represents an important addition for the treatment of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

Recent advances in lung cancer genomics: Application in targeted therapy

Genomic characterization of lung cancer has not only improved our understanding of disease biology and carcinogenesis but also revealed several therapeutic opportunities. Targeting tumor dependencies on specific genomic alterations (oncogene addiction) has accelerated the therapeutic developments and significantly improved the outcomes even in advanced stage of disease. Identification of genomic alterations predicting response to specific targeted treatment is the key to success for this "personalized treatment" approach. Availability of multiple choices of therapeutic options for specific genomic alterations highlight the importance of optimum sequencing of drugs. Multiplex gene testing has become mandatory in view of constantly increasing number of therapeutic targets and effective treatment options. Influence of genomic characteristics on response to immunotherapy further makes comprehensive genomic profiling necessary before therapeutic decision making. A comprehensive elucidation of resistance mechanisms and directed treatments have made the continuum of care possible and transformed this deadly disease into a chronic condition. Liquid biopsy-based approach has made the dynamic monitoring of disease possible and enabled treatment optimizations accordingly. Current lung cancer management is the perfect example of "precision-medicine" in clinical oncology.

Bisdemethoxycurcumin alleviates vandetanib-induced cutaneous toxicity in vivo and in vitro through autophagy activation

High incidence of cutaneous toxicity ranging from 29.2% to 71.2% has been reported during clinical use of vandetanib, which is a multi-target kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of unresectable medullary thyroid carcinoma. The cutaneous toxicity of vandetanib has limited its clinical benefits, but the underlying mechanisms and protective strategies are not well studied. Hence, we firstly established an in vivo model by continuously administrating vandetanib at 55 mg/kg/day to C57BL/6 for 21 days and verified that vandetanib could induce skin rash in vivo, which was consistent with the clinical study. We further cultured HaCaT and NHEK cells, the immortalized or primary human keratinocyte line, and investigated vandetanib (0-10 μM, 0-24 h)-caused alteration in cellular survival and death processes. The western blot showed that the expression level of apoptotic-related protein, c-PARP, c-Caspase 3 and Bax were increased, while the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 and MCL1 level were decreased. Meanwhile, vandetanib downregulated mitochondrial membrane potential which in turn caused the release of Cytochrome C, excessive production of reactive oxygen species and DNA damage. Furthermore, we found that 5 μM bisdemethoxycurcumin partially rescued vandetanib-induced mitochondria pathway-dependent keratinocyte apoptosis via activation of autophagy in vivo and in vitro, thereby ameliorated cutaneous toxicity. Conclusively, our study revealed the mechanisms of vandetanib-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes during the occurrence of cutaneous toxicity, and suggested bisdemethoxycurcumin as a potential protective drug. This work provided a potentially promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of vandetanib-induced cutaneous toxicity.

Paradigm shift in the management of metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in the United States. The use of precision medicine in the past 10 years has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape of lung cancer. Management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transitioned from a chemotherapeutic approach to targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for patients with targeted mutations and patients who do not have driver mutations; immunotherapy has been recently approved as frontline therapy, which has resulted in marked improvement in overall survival and added a new tool in our armamentarium.

AIMS

The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advancements in diagnostic approach and management strategies in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Medline (via PubMed) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines using the keywords "precision diagnosis," "advanced non-small cell lung cancer," "target therapies," and "immunotherapy."

CONCLUSION

The use of next-generation sequencing has significantly changed our understanding of molecular oncogenic mechanisms of lung cancer. These advancements have created a paradigm shift in the treatment strategies of metastatic lung cancer from primarily chemotherapeutic approach to increasing use of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) leading to better survival rates and lesser toxicity.

Diagnostic, Predictive, and Prognostic Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Management

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite growing efforts for its early detection by screening populations at risk, the majority of lung cancer patients are still diagnosed in an advanced stage. The management of lung cancer has dramatically improved in the last decade and is no longer based on the "one-fits-all" paradigm or the general histological classification of non-small cell versus small cell lung cancer. Emerging options of targeted therapies and immunotherapies have shifted the management of lung cancer to a more personalized treatment approach, significantly influencing the clinical course and outcome of the disease. Molecular biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools in the prognosis and prediction of therapy response. In this review, we discuss the relevant biomarkers used in the clinical management of lung tumors, from diagnosis to prognosis. We also discuss promising new biomarkers, focusing on non-small cell lung cancer as the most abundant type of lung cancer.

A contemporary review of rearranged during transfection-selective inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Rearranged during transfection genes are present in 1-2% of patients who have non-small cell lung cancer and 10-30% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer. The objective of this article is to review the current rearranged during transfection inhibitors indicated for patients with rearranged during transfection-mutated cancers and their future directions.Data sources: The pivotal phase I/II studies for selpercatinib and pralsetinib were evaluated. Current studies on rearranged during transfection inhibitors were searched on ClinicalTrials.gov using the key word "RET."Data summary: Selpercatinib and pralsetinib were the first two U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved rearranged during transfection-selective inhibitors for advanced or metastatic rearranged during transfection fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer, rearranged during transfection-mutant medullary thyroid cancer, and rearranged during transfection fusion-positive thyroid cancer. Both agents showed promising efficacy with objective response rate ranging from 60% to 73% in all aforementioned rearranged during transfection-mutated cancers. Additionally, benefits were seen even in patients with intracranial metastasis at baseline. Both showed favorable safety profiles. Some common class adverse events included elevated liver function tests and hypertension. Hematologic side effects such as anemia and neutropenia were more common with pralsetinib. Selpercatinib had interactions with acid suppressive therapy and specific instructions when used concomitantly.

CONCLUSIONS

While the rearranged during transfection inhibitors are generally well-tolerated, each agent possesses slightly different efficacy, side-effect profile, and drug-drug interactions.

The Novel RET Inhibitor SYHA1815 Inhibits RET-Driven Cancers and Overcomes Gatekeeper Mutations by Inducing G1 Cell-Cycle Arrest through c-Myc Downregulation

Rearranged during transfection (RET), an oncogenic driver, has been found in multiple tumor types and is thus a promising anticancer therapeutic target. Novel selective RET inhibitors (RETi) that can overcome V804 gatekeeper mutations, endowing resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKI) and, in particular, achieving KDR selectivity, are needed. In addition, the mechanisms underlying RET-inhibition-induced antiproliferative effects in the context of RET addiction are incompletely understood. This study describes a novel selective RETi, SYHA1815, which inhibited the kinase activity of RET wild type and V804 mutant with an IC₅₀ in the subnanomolar to nanomolar range. Notably, SYHA1815 exhibited approximately 20-fold selectivity for RET over KDR, almost equivalent to that of the launched selective inhibitor pralsetinib. SYHA1815 had only a marginal inhibitory effect on cellular KDR signaling at a high (200 nmol/L) concentration, confirming the selectivity over KDR. In addition, SYHA1815 exhibited a favorable selectivity profile, with greater than 100-fold selectivity for RET over 347 other kinases. It exhibited potent antitumor efficacy and overcame V804 mutations in vitro and in vivo by targeting RET. Then, using SYHA1815 as a probe, we found that RET inhibition suppressed RET-driven cell proliferation via G₁ cell-cycle arrest through downregulating c-Myc. Furthermore, disruption of c-Myc upon Brd4 inhibitor treatment led to G₁ cell-cycle arrest and overrode RET-driven cell proliferation. Moreover, consistent with the marked in vivo efficacy of RET inhibition, the intratumoral c-Myc level was significantly decreased. In summary, SYHA1815 is a promising RETi for RET-aberrant cancer treatment that is currently in a phase I trial.

Targeted Therapy for RET Fusion Lung Cancer: Breakthrough and Unresolved Issue

Molecular drugs targeting mutated or rearranged oncogene drivers have become one of the standard recognized treatments in patients with advanced and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. RET is located in the long arm of human chromosome 10 and encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase protein, and RET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma occurs in 1%-2% of cases. Clinical trials of multikinase inhibitors, including cabozantinib, vandetanib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, that inhibit RET oncogene activity have shown their antitumor efficacy. Recently, RET inhibitors such as pralsetinib and selpercatinib that are specialized for RET kinase have also been developed, and their efficacy was investigated in previous clinical trials (BLU-667 and LOXO-292). In this review, we summarized the effects and adverse events of multikinase and selective RET inhibitors and the various diagnostic techniques for RET gene fusion. In the perspective part, we focused on the unsolved issues on treatment for RET fusion-positive lung cancer and future developments.

RET Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

RET rearrangements are observed in 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and result in the constitutive activation of downstream pathways normally implied in cell proliferation, growth, differentiation and survival. In NSCLC patients, RET rearrangements have been associated with a history of non-smoking, a higher rate of brain metastasis at initial diagnosis and a low immune infiltrate. Traditionally, RET fusions are considered mutually exclusive with other oncogenic drivers, even though a co-occurrence with EGFR mutations and MET amplifications has been observed. Cabozantinib, vandetanib and lenvatinib are the first multi-kinase inhibitors tested in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients with contrasting results. More recently, two selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated higher efficacy rates and good tolerability and they were approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC on the bases of the results of phase II studies. Two ongoing phase III clinical trials are currently comparing selpercatinib or pralsetinib to standard first line treatments and will definitively establish their efficacy in RET-positive NSCLC patients.

Targeting Rearranged during Transfection in Cancer: A Perspective on Small-Molecule Inhibitors and Their Clinical Development

Rearranged during transfection (RET) is a receptor tyrosine kinase essential for the normal development and maturation of a diverse range of tissues. Aberrant RET signaling in cancers, due to RET mutations, gene fusions, and overexpression, results in the activation of downstream pathways promoting survival, growth, and metastasis. Pharmacological manipulation of RET is effective in treating RET-driven cancers, and efforts toward developing RET-specific therapies have increased over the last 5 years. In 2020, RET-selective inhibitors pralsetinib and selpercatinib achieved clinical approval, which marked the first approvals for kinase inhibitors specifically developed to target the RET oncoprotein. This Perspective discusses current development and clinical applications for RET precision medicine by providing an overview of the incremental improvement of kinase inhibitors for use in RET-driven malignancies.

Responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in RET-aberrant malignancies

PURPOSE

The receptor tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) can be oncogenically activated by gene fusions or point mutations. Multikinase inhibitors such as cabozantinib, lenvatinib and vandetanib have demonstrated activity in RET-dependent malignancies, and selective RET inhibitors (Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib) are in clinical trials. However, the responsiveness of RET-dependent malignancies to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. We compared the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICI versus non-ICI therapy in patients with malignancies harbouring activating RET mutations or fusions (RET+).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all RET+ patients who were referred to the phase I clinical trials programme at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was conducted. TTD was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify independent risk factors of treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients who received systemic therapy for RET+ malignancies, 20 (28.6%) received ICI and 50 (71.4%) received non-ICI therapy. Non-ICI therapy was associated with decreased risk for treatment discontinuation compared with ICI in the overall population (HR=0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.62; p=0.000834) and in patients with RET point mutations (HR=0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.45; p=0.00134). In patients with RET fusions, non-ICI therapy was associated with a non-statistically significant decreased risk of treatment discontinuation (HR=0.59; 95% CI 0.25-1.4; p=0.24). ICI therapy and a diagnosis other than medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the prioritisation of non-ICI over ICI therapy in patients with RET+ tumours.