RAS testing of liquid biopsy correlates with the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in the CAPRI-GOIM trial

Ongoing Clinical Trials and Future Research Scenarios of Circulating Tumor DNA for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive, timely approach to provide molecular diagnosis and monitor tumor evolution in patients with cancer. Since the molecular landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is substantially heterogeneous and dynamic over space and time, ctDNA holds significant advantages as a biomarker for this disease. Numerous studies have demonstrated that ctDNA broadly recapitulates the molecular profile of the primary tumor and metastases, and have mainly focused on the genotyping of RAS and BRAF, that is propaedeutic for anti-EGFR treatment selection. However, ctDNA soon broadened its scope towards the assessment of early tumor response, as well as the identification of drug resistance biomarkers to drive potential molecular actionability. In this review article, we provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art of this methodology and its applications, focusing on ongoing clinical trials that employ ctDNA to prospectively guide treatment in patients with mCRC.

Transient 'NeoBRAF wild type' state in a patient with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

We report the case of a patient with a BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, with evidence of acquired 'NeoBRAF wild-type' (wt) state. The patient, longitudinally assessed by liquid biopsy, obtained a remarkable clinical outcome with a multimodal approach including surgery, systemic treatment and targeted therapy. In patients with newly diagnosed RAS and BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, longitudinal assessment with liquid biopsy is not routinely used in clinical practice. We report the case of a patient with a BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, with evidence of acquired 'neoBRAF wild-type' (wt) state. The patient obtained a remarkable clinical outcome and has been longitudinally assessed by liquid biopsy.

Dynamics of RAS Mutations in Liquid Biopsies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients-Case Series and Literature Review

Liquid biopsies can accurately identify molecular alterations in patients with colorectal cancer with high concordance with tissue analysis and shorter turnaround times. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis can be used for diagnosing and monitoring tumor evolution in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are treated with EGFR inhibitors. In this article, we reported three clinical cases to illustrate the relevance of RAS mutations identified in ctDNA samples of patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who received an EGFR inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The identification of RAS mutations in these patients is one of the most frequently identified mechanisms of acquired resistance. However, detecting a KRAS mutation via liquid biopsy can be caused by inter-tumor heterogeneity or it can be a false positive due to clonal hematopoiesis. More research is needed to determine whether ctDNA monitoring may help guide therapy options in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We performed a literature review to assess the technologies that are used for analysis of RAS mutations on ctDNA, the degree of agreement between tissue and plasma and the importance of tissue/plasma discordant cases.

Functional Investigation of IGF1R Mutations in Multiple Myeloma

High expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) and RTK mutations are associated with high-risk/worse prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM). Combining the pIGF1R/pINSR inhibitor linsitinib with the proteasome inhibitor (PI) bortezomib seemed promising in a clinical trial, but IGF1R expression was not associated with therapy response. Because the oncogenic impact of IGF1R mutations is so far unknown, we investigated the functional impact of IGF1R mutations on survival signaling, viability/proliferation and survival response to therapy. We transfected four human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) with IGF1RWT, IGF1RD1146N and IGF1RN1129S (Sleeping Beauty), generated CRISPR-Cas9 IGF1R knockouts in the HMCLs U-266 (IGF1RWT) and L-363 (IGF1RD1146N) and tested the anti-MM activity of linsitinib alone and in combination with the second-generation PI carfilzomib in seven HMCLs. IGF1R knockout entailed reduced proliferation. Upon IGF1R overexpression, survival signaling was moderately increased in all HCMLs and slightly affected by IGF1RN1129S in one HMCL, whereby the viability remained unaffected. Expression of IGF1RD1146N reduced pIGF1R-Y1135, especially under serum reduction, but did not impact downstream signaling. Linsitinib and carfilzomib showed enhanced anti-myeloma activity in six out of seven HMCL irrespective of the IGF1R mutation status. In conclusion, IGF1R mutations can impact IGF1R activation and/or downstream signaling, and a combination of linsitinib with carfilzomib might be a suitable therapeutic approach for MM patients potentially responsive to IGF1R blockade.

Prospects of liquid biopsy in the prognosis and clinical management of gastrointestinal cancers

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for one-fourth of the global cancer incidence and are incriminated to cause one-third of cancer-related deaths. GI cancer includes esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, mostly diagnosed at advanced stages due to a lack of accurate markers for early stages. The invasiveness of diagnostic methods like colonoscopy for solid biopsy reduces patient compliance as it cannot be frequently used to screen patients. Therefore, minimally invasive approaches like liquid biopsy may be explored for screening and early identification of gastrointestinal cancers. Liquid biopsy involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of certain cancer-specific biomarkers in body fluids such as blood, serum, saliva, and urine to predict disease progression, therapeutic tolerance, toxicities, and recurrence by evaluating minimal residual disease and its correlation with other clinical features. In this review, we deliberate upon various tumor-specific cellular and molecular entities such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and exosome-derived biomolecules and cite recent advances pertaining to their use in predicting disease progression, therapy response, or risk of relapse. We also discuss the technical challenges associated with translating liquid biopsy into clinical settings for various clinical applications in gastrointestinal cancers.

Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer

Liquid biopsy refers to a set of pathological samples retrieved from non-solid sources, such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva through non-invasive or minimally invasive approaches. In the recent decades, an increasing number of studies have focused on clinical applications and improving technological investigation of liquid biopsy biosources for diagnostic goals particularly in cancer. Materials extracted from these sources and used for medical evaluations include cells like circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), cell-free nucleic acids released by cells, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), cell-free RNA (cfRNA), and exosomes. Playing significant roles in the pathogenesis of human malignancies, analysis of these sources can provide easier access to genetic and transcriptomic information of the cancer tissue even better than the conventional tissue biopsy. Notably, they can represent the inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity and accordingly, liquid biopsies demonstrate strengths for improving diagnosis in early detection and screening, monitoring and follow-up after therapies, and personalization of therapeutical strategies in various types of human malignancies. In this review, we aim to discuss the roles, functions, and analysis approaches of liquid biopsy sources and their clinical implications in human malignancies with a focus on colorectal cancer.

Negative hyperselection of elderly patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving initial panitumumab plus FOLFOX or 5-FU/LV

BACKGROUND

Upfront anti-EGFR therapy represents the standard of care for patients with left-sided, MSS/pMMR, RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Molecular 'hyperselection' may optimize EGFR inhibition by detecting additional resistance alterations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used comprehensive genomic profiling on archival samples of elderly patients enrolled in the PANDA trial to detect: HER2 amplification/mutations; MET amplification; NTRK/ROS1/ALK/RET rearrangements; PIK3CA exon 20 mutations; PTEN alterations; AKT1 mutations; MAP2K1 mutations. We defined 'Gene Altered' (GA) patients whose tumour harboured at least one alteration, and 'Hyperselected' (HS) those without. Survival and tumour response outcomes were correlated to hyperselection status alone or combined with primary tumour sidedness or treatment arm.

RESULTS

Genomic alterations were detected in 41/147 patients (27.9%). PFS, OS and ORR were inferior in GA versus HS (median PFS: 7.6 versus 12.8 months, HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.43-3.03, p < 0.001; median OS: 20.0 versus 29.5 months, HR = 1.82, 95% CI:1.23-2.69, p = 0.002; ORR: 51% versus 71%; OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.91, p = 0.02). In the multivariable models, the impact of hyperselection on PFS and OS was confirmed. Lower ORR was observed with 5-FU/LV/panitumumab in GA (40% versus 62%), but not in HS (70% versus 72%). GA was associated with worse survival and response regardless of primary tumour sidedness, whereas in the HS subgroup, right-and left sided tumours had similar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular hyperselection and comprehensive genomic profiling have a potential usefulness in elderly patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type, pMMR/MSS mCRC, eligible for upfront EGFR inhibition.

Circulating Tumor DNA to Drive Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

In the evolving molecular treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the identification of druggable alterations is pivotal to achieve the best therapeutic opportunity for each patient. Because the number of actionable targets is expanding, there is the need to timely detect their presence or emergence to guide the choice of different available treatment options. Liquid biopsy, through the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has proven safe and effective as a complementary method to address cancer evolution while overcoming the limitations of tissue biopsy. Even though data are accumulating regarding the potential for ctDNA-guided treatments applied to targeted agents, still major gaps in knowledge exist as for their application to different areas of the continuum of care. In this review, we recapitulate how ctDNA information could be exploited to drive different targeted treatment strategies in mCRC patients, by refining molecular selection before treatment by addressing tumor heterogeneity beyond tumor tissue biopsy; longitudinally monitoring early-tumor response and resistance mechanisms to targeted agents, potentially leading to tailored, molecular-driven, therapeutic options; guiding the molecular triage towards rechallenge strategies with anti-EGFR agents, suggesting the best time for retreatment; and providing opportunities for an "enhanced rechallenge" through additional treatments or combos aimed at overcoming acquired resistance. Besides, we discuss future perspectives concerning the potential role of ctDNA to fine-tune investigational strategies such as immuno-oncology.

[Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer]

In recent years, the treatment of colorectal carcinoma has experienced increasing individualization. In addition to RAS and BRAF mutational status that is firmly established in routine diagnostics, new therapeutic options evolved based on MSI and HER2 status as well as primary tumour localization. Offering the best targeted options in therapy requires new evidence-based decision-making algorithms regarding timing and scope of molecular pathological diagnostics in order for patients to receive an optimized therapy according to current treatment guidelines. New targeted therapies, some of which are about to be approved and for which pathology has to provide new molecular pathological biomarkers, will also play an increasingly important role in the future.

Clinical application of circulating tumour DNA in colorectal cancer

Liquid biopsies that detect circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) have the potential to revolutionise the personalised management of colorectal cancer. For patients with early-stage disease, emerging clinical applications include the assessment of molecular residual disease after surgery, the monitoring of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy, and early detection of recurrence during surveillance. In the advanced disease setting, data highlight the potential of ctDNA levels as a prognostic marker and as an early indicator of treatment response. ctDNA assessment can complement standard tissue-based testing for molecular characterisation, with the added ability to monitor emerging mutations under the selective pressure of targeted therapy. Here we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the use of ctDNA in colorectal cancer, the studies underway to address some of the outstanding questions, and the barriers to widespread clinical uptake.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in solid tumors using circulating tumor DNA: a systematic review

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to a very small number of residual tumor cells in the body during or after treatment, representing the persistence of the tumor and the possibility of clinical progress. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a DNA fragment actively secreted by tumor cells or released into the circulatory system during the process of apoptosis or necrosis of tumor cells, which emerging as a non-invasive biomarker to dynamically monitor the therapeutic effect and prediction of recurrence. The feasibility of ctDNA as MRD detection and the revolution in ctDNA-based liquid biopsies provides a potential method for cancer monitoring. In this review, we summarized the main methods of ctDNA detection (PCR-based Sequencing and Next-Generation Sequencing) and their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, we reviewed the significance of ctDNA analysis to guide the adjuvant therapy and predict the relapse of lung, breast and colon cancer et al. Finally, there are still many challenges of MRD detection, such as lack of standardization, false-negatives or false-positives results make misleading, and the requirement of validation using large independent cohorts to improve clinical outcomes.

Network approach in liquidomics landscape

Tissue-based biopsy is the present main tool to explore the molecular landscape of cancer, but it also has many limits to be frequently executed, being too invasive with the risk of side effects. These limits and the ability of cancer to constantly evolve its genomic profile, have recently led to the need of a less invasive and more accurate alternative, such as liquid biopsy. By searching Circulating Tumor Cells and residues of their nucleic acids or other tumor products in body fluids, especially in blood, but also in urine, stools and saliva, liquid biopsy is becoming the future of clinical oncology. Despite the current lack of a standardization for its workflows, that makes it hard to be reproduced, liquid biopsy has already obtained promising results for cancer screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and risk of recurrence.Through a more accessible molecular profiling of tumors, it could become easier to identify biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer, or Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair as predictive markers of pembrolizumab response.By monitoring circulating tumor DNA in longitudinal repeated sampling of blood we could also predict Minimal Residual Disease and the risk of recurrence in already radically resected patients.In this review we will discuss about the current knowledge of limitations and strengths of the different forms of liquid biopsies for its inclusion in normal cancer management, with a brief nod to their newest biomarkers and its future implications.

CtDNA-guided rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in RASwt metastatic colorectal cancer: Evidence from clinical practice

AIM

To apply extended ctDNA-based RAS genotyping to clinical criteria for improving the selection of patients eligible for anti-EGFR-based rechallenge in a real-world setting.

METHODS

ctDNA testing was prospectively applied to RASwt mCRC progressed after a first-line anti-EGFR-containing regimen and at least one other line. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

Among ten enrolled patients, the anti-EGFR rechallenge resulted in an objective response rate and disease control rate of 70% and 90%. The median progression-free survival was 11.3 months and overall survival was not reached. Compared with a historical cohort retreated with anti-EGFR agents based on clinical criteria, the ctDNA-driven approach resulted in a higher chance of achieving an objective response and longer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood-based RASwt status may enrich metastatic colorectal cancer more likely to benefit from anti-EGFR-based rechallenge. RAS genotyping in ctDNA represents a feasible, fast, and cost-effective tool to be implemented in the clinic for advancing precision medicine.

Efficacy and safety of a biomarker-driven cetuximab-based treatment regimen over 3 treatment lines in mCRC patients with RAS/BRAF wild type tumors at start of first line: The CAPRI 2 GOIM trial

Background

Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR such as cetuximab or panitumumab represent a major step forward in the treatment of RAS wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Unfortunately, primary and acquired resistance mechanisms occur, with a huge percentage of patients succumbing to the disease. In the last years, RAS mutation has been identified as the main molecular driver that determine resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Liquid biopsy analysis allows to a dynamic and longitudinal assessment of mutational status during mCRC disease and has provided important information on the use of anti-EGFR drugs beyond progression or as rechallenge strategy in patients with RAS WT tumors.

Methods

The phase II CAPRI 2 GOIM trial investigates the efficacy and safety of a bio-marker-driven cetuximab-based treatment regimen over 3 treatment lines in mCRC patients with RAS/BRAF WT tumors at start of first line.

Discussion

The aim of the study is to identify patients with RAS/BRAF WT tumors defined as "addicted" to an-anti EGFR based treatment along three lines of therapy. Moreover, the trial will evaluate the activity of cetuximab re-introduction in combination with irinotecan as 3^rd line therapy as rechallenge for patients that will be treated in second line with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab, having a RAS/BRAF mutant disease at progression after FOLFIRI plus cetuximab first line. A novel characteristic of this program is that the therapeutic algorithm will be defined at each treatment decision (first line, second line and third line) in a prospective fashion in each patient by a liquid biopsy assessment of RAS/BRAF status by a comprehensive 324 genes Foundation One Liquid assay (Foundation/Roche).

Trial registration

EudraCT Number: 2020-003008-15, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05312398.

Molecular assessment of endoscopically collected pancreatic juice and duodenal fluid from patients with pancreatic diseases

One concern associated with pancreatic diseases is the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Even with advances in diagnostic modalities, risk stratification of premalignant lesions and differentiation of pancreatic cysts are challenging. Pancreatic lesions of concern include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, serous cystadenomas, pseudocysts, and retention cysts, as well as cystic degeneration of solid tumors such as solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Pancreatic juice obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has previously been used for the detection of KRAS mutation. Recently, duodenal fluid, which can be obtained during the relatively minimally invasive procedures of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and cyst fluid collected by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were used for molecular biological analysis. Furthermore, advanced analytic methods with high sensitivity were used for the detection of single and multiple markers. Early detection of malignant pancreatic tumors and risk stratification of premalignant tumors can be performed using duodenal fluid samples with a single marker with high sensitivity. Technological advances in simultaneous detection of multiple markers allow for the differentiation of cystic pancreatic tumors. One thing to note is that the clinical guidelines do not recommend pancreatic cyst fluid and pancreatic juice (PJ) sampling by EUS-FNA and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, respectively, in actual clinical practice, but state that they be performed at experienced facilities, and duodenal fluid sampling is not mentioned in the guidelines. With improved specimen handling and the combination of markers, molecular markers in PJ samples may be used in clinical practice in the near future.

Evolution of RAS Mutations in Cell-Free DNA of Patients with Tissue RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-Line Treatment: The PERSEIDA Study

The serial analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution, providing continuous genetic information. PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing the cfDNA RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status evolution in first-line, metastatic CRC, RAS wild-type (according to baseline tumor tissue biopsy) patients. Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. One hundred and nineteen patients were included (102 received panitumumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment-panitumumab subpopulation). Fifteen (12.6%) patients presented baseline cfDNA RAS mutations (n = 14 [13.7%], panitumumab subpopulation) (mutant allele fraction ≥0.02 for all results). No patients presented emergent mutations (cfDNA RAS mutations not present at baseline) at 20 weeks. At disease progression, 11 patients (n = 9; panitumumab subpopulation) presented emergent mutations (RAS conversion rate: 19.0% [11/58]; 17.7% [9/51], panitumumab subpopulation). In contrast, three (5.2%) patients presenting baseline cfDNA RAS mutations were RAS wild-type at disease progression. No significant associations were observed between overall response rate or progression-free survival and cfDNA RAS mutational status in the total panitumumab subpopulation. Although, in patients with left-sided tumors, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed in cfDNA RAS wild-type patients compared to those presenting cfDNA RAS mutations at any time. Continuous evaluation of RAS mutations may provide valuable insights on tumor molecular dynamics that can help clinical practice.

Current concepts of anti-EGFR targeting in metastatic colorectal cancer

Anti-EGFR targeting is one of the key strategies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). For almost two decades oncologists have struggled to implement EGFR antibodies in the mCRC continuum of care. Both sidedness and RAS mutational status rank high among the predictive factors for the clinical efficacy of EGFR inhibitors. A prospective phase III trial has recently confirmed that anti-EGFR targeting confers an overall survival benefit only in left sided RAS-wildtype tumors when given in first line. It is a matter of discussion if more clinical benefit can be reached by considering putative primary resistance mechanisms (e.g., HER2, BRAF, PIK3CA, etc.) at this early stage of treatment. The value of this procedure in daily routine clinical utility has not yet been clearly delineated. Re-exposure to EGFR antibodies becomes increasingly crucial in the disease journey of mCRC. Yet re- induction or re-challenge strategies have been problematic as they relied on mathematical models that described the timely decay of EGFR antibody resistant clones. The advent of liquid biopsy and the implementation of more accurate next-generation sequencing (NGS) based high throughput methods allows for tracing of EGFR resistant clones in real time. These displays the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of metastatic disease compared to the former standard radiographic assessment and re-biopsy. These techniques may move EGFR inhibition in mCRC into the area of precision medicine in order to apply EGFR antibodies with the increase or decrease of EGFR resistant clones. This review critically discusses established concepts of tackling the EGFR pathway in mCRC and provides insight into the growing field of liquid biopsy guided personalized approaches of EGFR inhibition in mCRC.

Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17-01)

PURPOSE

Panitumumab plus FOLFOX (P-FOLFOX) is standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of panitumumab rechallenge is currently unknown. We assessed addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI (P-FOLFIRI) beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in patients with no RAS mutations in liquid biopsy (LB).

METHODS

In this randomized phase II trial, patients were assigned (3:2 ratio) to second-line P-FOLFIRI (arm A) or FOLFIRI alone (arm B). LB for circulating tumor DNA analysis was collected at study entry and at disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. Two-stage Simon design required 85 patients to be included (EudraCT 2017-004519-38).

RESULTS

Between February 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened (16 RAS mutations in LB detected) and 31 included (18 assigned to arm A and 13 to arm B). The study was prematurely closed due to inadequate recruitment. Serious adverse events were more frequent in arm A (44% vs. 23%). Overall response rate was 33% (arm A) vs. 7.7% (arm B). Six-month progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (arm A) and 38.5% (arm B). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (arm A) and 4.0 months (arm B) (hazard ratio, 0.58). At disease progression, RAS or BRAF mutations in LB were found in 4/11 patients (36%) in arm A and 2/10 (20%) in arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

The BEYOND study suggests a meaningful benefit of P-FOLFIRI beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with WT RAS status selected by LB. This strategy deserves further investigation.

Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents approximately 10% of all cancers and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths. Initial clinical presentation as metastatic CRC (mCRC) occurs in approximately 20% of patients. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with localized disease eventually develop metastases. Appropriate clinical management of these patients is still a challenging medical issue. Major efforts have been made to unveil the molecular landscape of mCRC. This has resulted in the identification of several druggable tumor molecular targets with the aim of developing personalized treatments for each patient. This review summarizes the improvements in the clinical management of patients with mCRC in the emerging era of precision medicine. In fact, molecular stratification, on which the current treatment algorithm for mCRC is based, although it does not completely represent the complexity of this disease, has been the first significant step toward clinically informative genetic profiling for implementing more effective therapeutic approaches. This has resulted in a clinically relevant increase in mCRC disease control and patient survival. The next steps in the clinical management of mCRC will be to integrate the comprehensive knowledge of tumor gene alterations, of tumor and microenvironment gene and protein expression profiling, of host immune competence as well as the application of the resulting dynamic changes to a precision medicine-based continuum of care for each patient. This approach could result in the identification of individual prognostic and predictive parameters, which could help the clinician in choosing the most appropriate therapeutic program(s) throughout the entire disease journey for each patient with mCRC. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:000-000.

Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of the continuous use of panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer - Exploratory sequential examination of acquired mutations in circulating cell-free DNA

This multicenter single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted panitumumab usage combined with cytotoxic doublets for unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Additionally, clinical value of the RAS/BRAF mutation status in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) was evaluated; this evaluation was measured independently of the protocol treatment. Eligible patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who had received the first-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX treatment were recruited and administered continuous panitumumab combined with FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months was the primary endpoint, with threshold and expected values of 35% and 50%, respectively. In total, 54 patients were enrolled between October 2017 and October 2019. The crude 6-month PFS rate was 37.0%, with a 4.8-month median PFS. The response rate and disease control rate were 16.7 % and 50.0%, respectively. Notably, of the 54 participants, 17 showed RAS/BRAF mutations until the end of the protocol treatment, and of the 22 patients with progressive disease as their best response, 10 possessed RAS/BRAF mutations in their plasma ccfDNA at baseline. The median PFS significantly differed among patients harboring tumors with BRAF and RAS mutations and those with wild-type tumors. In conclusion, this study failed to show the expected efficacy of the continuous panitumumab use in the second-line treatment. Liquid biopsy discriminated the duration of PFS according to the mutation status. The effectiveness of continuous treatment with panitumumab should be evaluated in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC determined by liquid biopsy at the start of the second-line treatment.

The implications of cell-free DNAs derived from tumor viruses as biomarkers of associated cancers

Cancer is still ranked as a leading cause of death according to estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the strong link between tumor viruses and human cancers have been proved for almost six decades. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has drawn enormous attention for its dynamic, instant, and noninvasive advantages as one popular type of cancer biomarker. cfDNAs are mainly released from apoptotic cells and exosomes released from cancer cells, including those infected with viruses. Although cfDNAs are present at low concentrations in peripheral blood, they can reflect tumor load with high sensitivity. Considering the relevance of the tumor viruses to the associated cancers, cfDNAs derived from viruses may serve as good biomarkers for the early screening, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring. In this review, we summarize the methods and newly developed analytic techniques for the detection of cfDNAs from different body fluids, and discuss the implications of cfDNAs derived from different tumor viruses in the detection and treatment monitoring of virus-associated cancers. A better understanding of cfDNAs derived from tumor viruses may help formulate novel anti-tumoral strategies to decrease the burden of cancers that attributed to viruses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Monitoring of RAS mutant clones in plasma of patients with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose

Some patients with histologically confirmed primary mCRC and mutated RAS reported undetectable RAS mutant clones in plasma after receiving anti-VEGF treatment. The aim was to prospectively assess it with its potential therapeutic implications.

Methods

RAS mutant genes in solid biopsy (before first-line treatment: FOLFOX/CAPOX + bevacizumab) were compared in liquid biopsy (before second-line treatment: panitumumab + FOLFIRI), using Idylla™ system. Discordant results between solid/liquid biopsies were assessed by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) test (solid/liquid biopsies).

Results

Twenty-three patients were assessed (seven had RAS mutant discrepancies between solid/liquid biopsies). The NGS test confirmed that 3/23 (13%) patients had undetectable RAS mutant clones in liquid biopsy and 3/23 (13%) presented discrepancies in solid biopsy (Idylla™ system vs. NGS test).

Conclusion

Thirteen percentage of patients had undetectable RAS mutant clones in liquid biopsy after first-line treatment. However, some discrepancies between solid and liquid biopsies have been observed. These results suggest a need to improve accuracy of RAS analyses, especially in solid biopsies.

A Liquid Biopsy-Based Approach for Monitoring Treatment Response in Post-Operative Colorectal Cancer Patients

Monitoring the therapeutic response of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is crucial to determine treatment strategies; therefore, we constructed a liquid biopsy-based approach for tracking tumor dynamics in non-metastatic (nmCRC) and metastatic (mCRC) patients (n = 55). Serial blood collections were performed during chemotherapy for measuring the amount and the global methylation pattern of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), the promoter methylation of SFRP2 and SDC2 genes, and the plasma homocysteine level. The average cfDNA amount was higher (p < 0.05) in nmCRC patients with recurrent cancer (30.4 ± 17.6 ng) and mCRC patients with progressive disease (PD) (44.3 ± 34.5 ng) compared to individuals with remission (13.2 ± 10.0 ng) or stable disease (12.5 ± 3.4 ng). More than 10% elevation of cfDNA from first to last sample collection was detected in all recurrent cases and 92% of PD patients, while a decrease was observed in most patients with remission. Global methylation level changes indicated a decline (75.5 ± 3.4% vs. 68.2 ± 8.4%), while the promoter methylation of SFRP2 and SDC2 and homocysteine level (10.9 ± 3.4 µmol/L vs. 13.7 ± 4.3 µmol/L) presented an increase in PD patients. In contrast, we found exact opposite changes in remission cases. Our study offers a more precise blood-based approach to monitor the treatment response to different chemotherapies than the currently used markers.

Impact of Delaying the Addition of Anti-EGFR in First Line of RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Weighted Pooled Data Analysis

Simple Summary

The first-line therapy of patients with RAS wild-type (WT) non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The introduction of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies is commonly delayed because of late RAS testing results. Our objective was to evaluate the impact on the overall survival of delayed anti-EGFR introduction strategy. This study compared 305 patients with delayed anti-EGFR introductions, 401 with immediate anti-EGFRs, and 129 with immediate anti-VEGFs. The study suggests that delayed introduction has no deleterious impact on survival compared to the immediate introduction of an anti-EGFR or of an anti-VEGF.

Abstract

The first-line therapy of patients with RAS wild-type (WT) non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The addition of anti-EGFR antibodies is commonly delayed in clinical practice because of late RAS testing results. Our objective was to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of a delayed anti-EGFR introduction strategy. This study pooled the data of two large retrospective studies. Patients with RAS WT non-resectable mCRC, treated in first line by a doublet chemotherapy with an anti-EGFR introduced with a delay of 2 to 4 cycles, were compared to an anti-EGFR and to an anti-VEGF that was introduced immediately. Patients numbering 305 in the delayed anti-EGFR group, 401 in the immediate anti-EGFR group, and 129 in the immediate anti-VEGF group were analyzed. After propensity scoring, there was no difference between the characteristics of the three groups. Median OS was 28.6 months (95% CI: 23.5–34.1) in the immediate anti-EGFR group, 35.1 (95% CI: 29.9–43.5) in the delayed anti-EGFR group, and 32.4 (95% CI: 25.4–44.8) in the immediate anti-VEGF group. There was no significant difference concerning median OS (p = 0.24) or progression-free survival (p = 0.56). This study suggests that delaying the introduction of an anti-EGFR has no deleterious impact on survival compared to the immediate introduction of an anti-VEGF or of an anti-EGFR.

Dynamics of RAS/BRAF Mutations in cfDNA from Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Polychemotherapy and Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies

Analysis of plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) might allow for the early identification of resistance in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients receiving anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. We tested plasma samples from the Erbitux Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Strategy (ERMES) phase III trial of FOLFIRI+Cetuximab in first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Samples were collected at baseline (n = 37), at 8 weeks of treatment (n = 32), progressive disease (PD; n = 36) and 3 months after PD (n = 21). cfDNA testing was performed using the Idylla™ ctKRAS and ctNRAS-BRAF tests and the Oncomine Pan-Cancer Cell-Free Assay. Analysis of basal samples revealed RAS/BRAF mutations in 6/37 cases. A transient RAS positivity not associated with PD was observed at 8 weeks in five cases that showed no mutations at baseline and PD. The frequency of mutant cases increased at PD (33.3%) and decreased again at 3 months after PD (9.5%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients RAS/BRAF mutant at PD was 7.13 months versus 7.71 months in wild-type patients (p = 0.3892). These data confirm that the occurrence of RAS/BRAF mutations in mCRC patients receiving anti-EGFR agents is relatively frequent. However, the cfDNA dynamics of RAS mutations in patients treated with anti-EGFR agents plus polychemotherapy are complex and might not be directly associated with resistance to treatment.

Variant allele frequency in baseline circulating tumour DNA to measure tumour burden and to stratify outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a translational objective of the Valentino study

INTRODUCTION

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) variant allele fraction (VAF) might serve as a surrogate of disease burden and should be evaluated in comparison with CEA and RECIST-defined sum of target lesions.

METHODS

In this pre-planned analysis of the VALENTINO trial, we included patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving upfront FOLFOX/panitumumab with available baseline liquid biopsy. CtDNA was analysed by means of a 14-gene NGS panel. For each patient, the gene with the highest VAF in ctDNA was selected.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 135 patients. The median VAF was 12.6% (IQR: 2.0-45.2%). Higher VAF was observed in patients with liver metastases and with synchronous metastases presentation. Patients with high VAF had poorer median OS compared to those with low VAF (21.8 vs 36.5 months; HR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.20-2.76; p = 0.005). VAF outperformed baseline CEA and target lesion diameter in the prognostic stratification and remained significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.003) in a multivariate model. VAF was not significantly correlated with dimensional response and PFS.

CONCLUSION

CtDNA measured by VAF is prognostic in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Response and PFS after an anti-EGFR-based first-line strategy are independent from initial tumour burden.

Sensitive Quantification of Cell-Free Tumor DNA for Early Detection of Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer

The detection of plasma cell–free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is prognostic in colorectal cancer (CRC) and has potential for early prediction of disease recurrence. In clinical routine, ctDNA-based diagnostics are limited by the low concentration of ctDNA and error rates of standard next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. We evaluated the potential to increase the stability and yield of plasma cell–free DNA (cfDNA) for routine diagnostic purposes using different blood collection tubes and various manual or automated cfDNA extraction protocols. Sensitivity for low-level ctDNA was measured in KRAS-mutant cfDNA using an error-reduced NGS procedure. To test the applicability of rapid evaluation of ctDNA persistence in clinical routine, we prospectively analyzed postoperative samples of 67 CRC (stage II) patients. ctDNA detection was linear between 0.0045 and 45%, with high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (100%) for mutations at 0.1% VAF. The stability and yield of cfDNA were superior when using Streck BCT tubes and a protocol by Zymo Research. Sensitivity for ctDNA increased 1.5-fold by the integration of variant reads from triplicate PCRs and with PCR template concentration. In clinical samples, ctDNA persistence was found in ∼9% of samples, drawn 2 weeks after surgery. Moreover, in a retrospective analysis of 14 CRC patients with relapse during adjuvant therapy, we successfully detected ctDNA (median 0.38% VAF; range 0.18–5.04% VAF) in 92.85% of patients significantly prior (median 112 days) to imaging-based surveillance. Using optimized pre-analytical conditions, the detection of postoperative ctDNA is feasible with excellent sensitivity and allows the prediction of CRC recurrence in routine oncology testing.

Use of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Measurement of Therapy Predictive Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer

Biomarkers that predict likely response or resistance to specific therapies are critical in personalising treatment for cancer patients. Such biomarkers are now available for an increasing number of anti-cancer therapies, especially targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The gold-standard method for determining predictive biomarkers requires tumour tissue. Obtaining tissue, however, is not always possible and even if possible, the amount or quality of tissue obtained may be inadequate for biomarker analysis. Tumour DNA, however, can be released into the bloodstream, giving rise to what is referred to as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). In contrast to tissue, blood can be obtained from effectively all patients in a minimally invasive and safe manner. Other advantages of blood over tissue for biomarker testing include a shorter turn-around time and an ability to perform serial measurements. Furthermore, blood should provide a more complete profile of mutations present in heterogeneous tumours than a single-needle tissue biopsy. A limitation of blood vis-à-vis tissue, however, is lower sensitivity and, thus, the possibility of missing an actionable mutation. Despite this limitation, blood-based predictive biomarkers, such as mutant EGFR for predicting response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and mutant PIK3CA for predicting response to alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer, may be used when tissue is unavailable. Although tissue remains the gold standard for detecting predictive biomarkers, it is likely that several further blood-based assays will soon be validated and used when tissue is unavailable or unsuitable for analysis.

Next Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA Can Optimize Second Line Treatment in RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer after Progression on Anti-EGFR Therapy: Time to Rethink Our Approach

Background Management of Raswild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients upon disease progression after the successful use of targeted treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and backbone chemotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Development of treatment resistance with prevalence of pre-existing RAS mutated clones, RAS mutation conversion, truncation of extracellular receptor domains as well as HER2 and MET amplification are molecular events that can be difficult to follow without the use of sophisticated laboratory techniques. Summary The clinical hurdle of re-biopsy and tumor heterogeneity can be overcome by the implementation Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and identify drugable mutations or recovery of RAS-wildness. In this opinion paper we summarize with critical thinking the clinical approach to be followed after the failure of first line treatment in Ras wild-type CRC tumors with the use of NGS. Key Messages Rechallenge with anti-EGFR inhibitors, in case of persistent or recovery of Ras wildness, and targeted approach of specific mutations (BRAF inhibitors) amplifications (anti-Her2 treatment) or fusion proteins (NTRK inhibitors) can by guided by the use of NGS. The use of NGS platforms for serial analysis of ctDNA is an important step to better understand the molecular landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer and guide clinical decisions. NGS should be considered a mainstay in clinical practice for the management of CRC patients and health authorities should consider reimbursing its use in the appropriate clinical settings.

Advantages and Challenges of Using ctDNA NGS to Assess the Presence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Solid Tumors

The ability to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) after a curative-intent surgery or treatment is of paramount importance, because it offers the possibility to help guide the clinical decisions related adjuvant therapy. Thus, the earlier MRD is detected, the earlier potentially beneficial treatment can be proposed to patients who might need it. Liquid biopsies, and in particular the next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood, have been the focus of an increasing amount of research in the past years. The ctDNA detection at advanced cancer stages is practicable for several solid tumors, and complements molecular information on acquired therapy resistance. In the context of MRD, it is by definition more challenging to detect ctDNA, but it is technically achievable and provides information on treatment response and probability of relapse significantly earlier than standard imaging methods. The clinical benefit of implementing this new technique in the routine is being tested in interventional clinical trials at the moment. We propose here an update of the current use of ctDNA detection by NGS as a tool to assess the presence of MRD and improve adjuvant treatment of solid tumors. We also discuss the main limitations and medium-term perspectives of this process in the clinic.

Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review

In the era of personalized medicine and targeted therapies for the management of patients with cancer, ultrasensitive detection methods for tumor genotyping, such as next-generation sequencing or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), play a significant role. In the search for less invasive strategies for diagnosis, prognosis and disease monitoring, the number of publications regarding liquid biopsy approaches using ddPCR has increased substantially in recent years. There is a long list of malignancies in which ddPCR provides a reliable and accurate tool for detection of nucleic acid-based markers derived from cell-free DNA, cell-free RNA, circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles or exosomes when isolated from whole blood, plasma and serum, helping to anticipate tumor relapse or unveil intratumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution in response to treatment. This updated review describes recent developments in ddPCR platforms and provides a general overview about the major applications of liquid biopsy in blood, including its utility for molecular response and minimal residual disease monitoring in hematological malignancies or the therapeutic management of patients with colorectal or lung cancer, particularly for the selection and monitoring of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although plasma is the main source of genetic material for tumor genomic profiling, liquid biopsy by ddPCR is being investigated in a wide variety of biologic fluids, such as cerebrospinal fluid, urine, stool, ocular fluids, sputum, saliva, bronchoalveolar lavage, pleural effusion, mucin, peritoneal fluid, fine needle aspirate, bile or pancreatic juice. The present review focuses on these "alternative" sources of genetic material and their analysis by ddPCR in different kinds of cancers.

Circulating Tumour DNA and Colorectal Cancer: the Next Revolutionary Biomarker?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Improving outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting has been challenging. Here, we review the current and future directions for using ctDNA in clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with its ability to detect minimal residual disease is beginning to refine the way we assess recurrence risk in the adjuvant setting. We can potentially tailor treatments to reduce recurrence risk and minimize treatment toxicity. In the metastatic setting, ctDNA can provide a less invasive method of detecting clinically important genetic changes to guide molecularly targeted treatment and to identify mechanisms of molecular resistance. ctDNA can be a surrogate marker for treatment response and help guide the timing of anti-EGFR rechallenge. We await the results of the randomized clinical trials assessing clinical utility of ctDNA in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting before incorporating ctDNA into clinical practice.

Plasma-Based Genotyping in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Molecular genotyping for advanced solid malignancies has transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic disease. Treatment decisions in a growing number of tumors require knowledge of molecularly driven alterations in order to select optimal targeted therapy. Although genomic testing of tumor tissue is the gold standard for identifying targetable genomic alterations, biopsy samples are often limited or difficult to access. This has paved the way for the development of plasma-based approaches for genomic profiling. Recent advances in the detection of plasma-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the integration of plasma-based molecular profiling into clinical practice as an alternative or complementary tool for genomic testing in the setting of advanced cancer, to facilitate the identification of driver mutations to guide initial treatment and diagnose resistance. Several guidelines now recommend the use of plasma where tumor tissue is limited to identify a targetable genomic alteration. Current plasma-based assays can evaluate multiple genes in comprehensive panels, and their application in advanced disease will be increasingly incorporated into standard practice. This review focuses on current and future applications of plasma ctDNA-based assays in advanced solid malignancies, while highlighting some limitations in implementing this technology into clinical practice.

Circulating tumor DNA sequencing in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy with anti-EGFR

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may reveal dynamic tumor status during therapy. We conducted serial ctDNA analysis to investigate potential association with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving chemotherapy. Tissue KRAS/NRAS wild-type mCRC patients were enrolled and treated with first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. ctDNA isolated from plasma were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) with 16 targeted gene panel. Among 93 patients, 84 (90.3%) had at least 1 somatic mutation in baseline ctDNA samples (average 2.74). Five patients with KRAS or NRAS hotspot mutation in the ctDNA showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.029). Changes in average variant allele frequency (VAF) in ctDNA showed significant correlation with tumor size change at the time of first response evaluation (p = 0.020) and progressive disease (PD) (p = 0.042). Patients whose average VAF decreased below cutoff (< 1%) at the first evaluation showed significantly better PFS (p < 0.001), and the average VAF change further discriminated the PFS in the patients in partial response (p = 0.018). At the time of PD, 54 new mutations including KRAS and MAP2K1 emerged in ctDNA. ctDNA sequencing can provide mutation profile that could better reflect tumor mutation status and predict treatment outcome.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Outcomes Prediction in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a novel tool that has been investigated in several types of tumours, including colorectal cancer (CRC). In fact, the techniques based on liquid biopsies are proposed as appealing non-invasive alternatives to tissue biopsy, adding more insights into tumour molecular profile, heterogeneity and for cancer detection and monitoring. Additionally, some analysis showed that in CRC patients, ctDNA seems to act as a biomarker able to predict the outcome (prognostic role) and the response to treatments (predictive role). In particular, in the early stage CRC (stage I-III), it could represent a time marker of adjuvant therapy as well as a marker of minimal residual disease and recurrence risk in addition to the already recognized risk factors. In metastatic CRC, the analysis of molecular tumour profile by ctDNA has shown to have high concordance with the tissue biopsy at diagnosis. Additionally, some studies demonstrated that ctDNA level during the treatment was linked with the early response to treatment and prognosis. Finally, the quantitative analysis of ctDNA and copy number alterations may be useful in order to detect resistance to therapy at the time of progression of disease and to help in finding new therapeutic targets.

A multiple network-based bioinformatics pipeline for the study of molecular mechanisms in oncological diseases for personalized medicine

Motivation

Assessment of genetic mutations is an essential element in the modern era of personalized cancer treatment. Our strategy is focused on ‘multiple network analysis’ in which we try to improve cancer diagnostics by using biological networks. Genetic alterations in some important hubs or in driver genes such as BRAF and TP53 play a critical role in regulating many important molecular processes. Most of the studies are focused on the analysis of the effects of single mutations, while tumors often carry mutations of multiple driver genes. The aim of this work is to define an innovative bioinformatics pipeline focused on the design and analysis of networks (such as biomedical and molecular networks), in order to: (1) improve the disease diagnosis; (2) identify the patients that could better respond to a given drug treatment; and (3) predict what are the primary and secondary effects of gene mutations involved in human diseases.

Results

By using our pipeline based on a multiple network approach, it has been possible to demonstrate and validate what are the joint effects and changes of the molecular profile that occur in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) carrying mutations in multiple genes. In this way, we can identify the most suitable drugs for the therapy for the individual patient. This information is useful to improve precision medicine in cancer patients. As an application of our pipeline, the clinically significant case studies of a cohort of mCRC patients with the BRAF V600E-TP53 I195N missense combined mutation were considered.

Availability

The procedures used in this paper are part of the Cytoscape Core, available at (www.cytoscape.org). Data used here on mCRC patients have been published in [55].

Supplementary Information

A supplementary file containing a more detailed discussion of this case study and other cases is available at the journal site as Supplementary Data.

Practices and expectations on the use of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer patients: A bi-national AGEO/AIOM/GERCOR/FFCD/FRENCH survey

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence shows that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a valuable tool in providing molecular, prognostic, predictive and dynamic information in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aimed to make a picture of knowledge, practice, attitudes and expectations about ctDNA in CRC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An online CRC-ctdna survey was distributed from November 2019 to January 2020 to French and Italian cooperative and scientific groups of Hepato-Gastroenterologists (HGE), Medical Oncologists (MO), Radiotherapists (RT) and Digestive Surgeons (DS).

RESULTS

Overall, 307 physicians completed the survey (57% Italian; 43% French). Most of them were MO (62%) and HGE (24%). Affiliations were University Hospital (48%), Cancer Center (21%), General Hospital (21%) and Private Hospital (10%). Notably, half of respondents declared to have access to ctDNA in their daily practice. Of them, 53% uses ctDNA to assess RAS/BRAF status only, 46% for RAS/BRAF with other mutations and 1% only for other mutations. MO and HGE identified quick RAS profiling (P = 0.031) as the main reason of interest in the use of ctDNA. Physicians from University Hospitals and Cancer Centers prescribed more ctDNA (P < 0.001) and more often in house (P < 0.001). The main future expectations concerning ctDNA were to guide therapeutic strategies in metastatic (78%) and adjuvant (73%) settings, and to better/quicker profile disease at baseline (56%).

CONCLUSION

Half of participants can order ctDNA in their daily practice. Molecular profiling of metastatic patients remains the main goal of ctDNA use and ctDNA-based therapeutic strategies are an expectation for the future in both adjuvant and metastatic settings.

Liquid Biopsy for Prognosis and Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Circulating Tumor Cells vs Circulating Tumor DNA

Liquid biopsy recently gained widespread attention as a noninvasive alternative/complementary technique to tissue biopsy in patients with cancer. As technological advances have improved both feasibility and turnaround time, liquid biopsy has expanded tumor molecular analysis with acknowledgement of both spatial and temporal heterogeneity, overcoming many limitations of traditional tissue biopsy. Because of its diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value, liquid biopsy has been extensively studied also in metastatic colorectal cancer. Indeed, as personalized medicine establishes its role in cancer treatment, genetic biomarkers unveiling the emergence of early resistance are needed. Among the wide variety of tumor analytes amenable to collection, circulating DNA and circulating tumor cells are the most adopted approaches, and both carry clinical relevance in colorectal cancer. However, few studies focused on comparing feasibility between these two approaches. In this review, we discuss the potential implications of liquid biopsy in metastatic colorectal cancer, assessing the advantages and drawbacks of circulating DNA and circulating tumor cells, and highlighting the most relevant trials for clinical practice.

Prognostic value of absolute quantification of mutated KRAS in circulating tumour DNA in lung adenocarcinoma patients prior to therapy

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive and accurate method for quantification of nucleic acid sequences. We used absolute quantification of mutated v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homology gene (KRAS) by ddPCR to investigate the prognostic role of mutated KRAS in patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinomas. Pre-treatment plasma samples from 60 patients with stages I-IV KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinomas were analysed for KRAS mutations. The associations between survival, detectable KRAS mutations in plasma, and the plasma concentration of mutated KRAS were assessed. Overall, 23 of 60 (38%) patients had detectable KRAS mutation in plasma. The percentage of patients with detectable mutation was 8% in stage I, 30% in stage II, 71% in stage III, and 73% in stage IV. Estimated overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-39.9] and 50.8 months (95% CI 0-107.3), respectively. Patients with detectable mutations in plasma had significantly worse median PFS compared to patients with undetectable mutation (13.1 versus 70.1 months) and shorter median OS (20.7 versus not reached). High circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) concentrations of mutated KRAS were significantly associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.008, 95% CI 1.004-1.012] and OS (HR 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.011). All associations remained statistically significant in multivariable analyses. In conclusion, ddPCR is an accurate and easily feasible technique for quantification of KRAS mutations in ctDNA. The presence of detectable KRAS mutation in plasma at baseline was associated with worse PFS and OS. High concentration of mutated KRAS in ctDNA was an independent negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS.

Biomarker-Guided Anti-Egfr Rechallenge Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

The survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been improved over the years and now reaches 30–40 months. However, few therapeutic options are available after failure of first- and second-line treatments. In fact, prognosis of chemo-refractory mCRC remains poor. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Emerging evidence suggest that retreatment with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitors after a treatment break, in patients that obtained a clinical benefit by previous anti-EGFR, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that after a “treatment holiday” EGFR resistant cancer cells decay, restoring the sensibility to EGFR blockade. In this review we analyze the current knowledge of retreatment with EGFR inhibitors, examine the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients. Finally, we discuss future perspectives and on-going clinical trials.

Abstract

The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in RAS mutant cancer cell decay, restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab and panitumumab. In fact, rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR drugs has shown promising clinical activity, particularly in patients with plasma RAS and BRAF wild type circulating tumor DNA, as defined by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the current knowledge on rechallenge and to investigate the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients that could benefit from this therapeutic strategy. Finally, we discuss on-going trials and future perspectives.

The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Before anti-EGFR therapy is given to patients with colorectal cancer, it is required to determine KRAS mutation status in tumor. When tumor tissue is not available, cell-free DNA (liquid biopsy) is commonly used as an alternative. Due to the low abundance of tumor-derived DNA in cell-free DNA samples, methods with high sensitivity were preferred, including digital polymerase chain reaction, amplification refractory mutation system and next-generation sequencing. The aim of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the accuracy of those methods in detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA sample from patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. After removing duplicates from the 170 publications found by literature search, eligible studies were identified using pre-defined criteria. Quality of the publications and relevant data were assessed and extracted thereafter. Meta-DiSc and STATA softwares were used to pool the accuracy parameters from the extracted data.

Results

A total of 33 eligible studies were identified for this systemic review and meta-analysis. After pooling, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.74–0.79), 0.87 (95%CI: 0.85–0.89), and 23.96 (95%CI: 13.72–41.84), respectively. The overall positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.55 (95%CI: 3.76–8.19) and 0.29 (95%CI: 0.21–0.38), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.8992.

Conclusion

Digital polymerase chain reaction, amplification refractory mutation system, and next-generation sequencing had overall high accuracy in detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA sample. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to further convince the accuracy and usefulness of KRAS mutation detection using cfDNA/liquid biopsy samples in clinical practice.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42020176682; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=176682.

Digital next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA for pancreatic cancer

Background and Aim

The clinical applicability of digital next‐generation sequencing (dNGS), which eliminates polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing error‐derived noise by using molecular barcodes (MBs), has not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the utility of dNGS of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in liquid biopsies obtained from patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Fifty‐eight patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) were included. Samples were subjected to sequencing of 50 cancer‐related genes using next‐generation sequencing (NGS). The results were used as reference gene alterations. NGS of cfDNA from plasma was performed for patients with a mutant allele frequency (MAF) >1% and an absolute mutant number > 10 copies/plasma mL in KRAS or GNAS by digital PCR. Sequence readings with and without MBs were compared with reference to EUS‐FNA‐derived gene alterations.

Results

The concordance rate between dNGS of cfDNA and EUS‐FNA‐derived gene alterations was higher with than without MBs (p = 0.039), and MAF cut‐off values in dNGS could be decreased to 0.2%. dNGS using MBs eliminated PCR and sequencing error by 74% and 68% for TP53 and all genes, respectively. Overall, dNGS detected mutations in KRAS (45%) and TP53 (26%) and copy number alterations in CCND2, CCND3, CDK4, FGFR1, and MYC, which are targets of molecular‐targeted drugs.

Conclusions

dNGS of cfDNA using MBs is useful for accurate detection of gene alterations even with low levels of MAFs. These results may be used to inform the development of diagnostics and therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of pancreatic cancer.

Chemotherapy-associated clonal hematopoiesis mutations should be taken seriously in plasma cell-free DNA KRAS/NRAS/BRAF genotyping for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Genotyping of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an increasingly important method to assess the tumor mutation status in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) releases non-tumor somatic mutations into blood, causing false positive results in cfDNA-based tumor genotyping. It is still not clear if CH should be examined in all CRC patients undergoing cfDNA analysis.

METHODS

We analyzed cfDNA KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genotypes in 236 metastatic CRC patients, who had matched tissue genotyping results, by next-generation sequencing using plasma cfDNA. The cfDNA-only mutations with allele frequencies (AFs) < 5% were highly suspicious for being CH-derived mutations. The origins of cfDNA mutations were confirmed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) using paired peripheral blood cells (PBCs) and CH-derived mutations were finally determined. One patient with a CH-derived mutation was followed up and the subpopulation of blood cells, in which CH was present, was investigated.

RESULTS

Three CH-derived mutations, KRAS Q61H, KRAS G12D and KRAS G12V, were identified in the patient cohort. All three patients harboring corresponding CH-derived mutations had a prior chemotherapy history. The CH-derived KRAS G12V mutation in a patient was found only present in lymphocytes and persisting under treatment. For all cfDNA mutations, the CH-derived ones were clustered in the patients with < 5% mutation AF and prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CH in CRC patients was limited, and prior chemotherapy was a contributing factor of CH. It is recommended for patients with < 5% mutation AF and prior chemotherapy to have genotyping analysis of their PBCs following plasma cfDNA genotyping.

The Added Value of Baseline Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Patients with Molecularly Hyperselected, Left-sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The routine use of liquid biopsy is not recommended for the choice of initial treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We included patients with left-sided, RAS/BRAF wild-type, HER2-negative, and microsatellite stable mCRC, treated with upfront panitumumab/FOLFOX-4 in the Valentino study. We performed amplicon-based genomic profiling of 14 genes in baseline plasma samples and compared these data with tumor tissue ultra-deep sequencing results. Specific gene mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their clonality were associated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological dynamics.

RESULTS

Ten and 15 of 120 patients had a mutation of RAS and PIK3CA in ctDNA, with a positive concordance with tissue deep sequencing of only 31.3% and 47.1%, respectively. Presence of RAS or PIK3CA mutations in baseline ctDNA was associated with worse median PFS [8 vs. 12.8 months; HR, 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-4.81; P = 0.007 and 8.5 vs. 12.9 months; HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.63-5.04; P < 0.001] and median OS (17.1 vs. 36.5 months; HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.03-4.96; P = 0.042 and 21.1 vs. 38.9 months; HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.16-4.07; P = 0.015). RAS mutations in ctDNA were associated with worse RECIST response, early tumor shrinkage, and depth of response, while PIK3CA mutations were not. Patients with higher levels of RAS/PIK3CA variant allele fraction (VAF) in ctDNA had the worst outcomes (VAF ≥ 5% vs. all wild-type: median PFS, 7.7 vs. 13.1 months; HR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.03-7.95; P < 0.001 and median OS, 18.8 vs. 38.9 months; HR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.04-8.12; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline ctDNA profiling may add value to tumor tissue testing to refine the molecular hyperselection of patients with mCRC for upfront anti-EGFR-based strategies.

ctDNA and Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer: Time to Re-Invent Our Treatment Paradigm

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. While there have been significant developments in the treatments for patients with metastatic CRC in recent years, improving outcomes in the adjuvant setting has been more challenging. Recent technological advances in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) assay with the ability to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative intent surgery will fundamentally change how we assess recurrence risk and conduct adjuvant trials. Studies in non-metastatic CRC have now demonstrated the prognostic impact of ctDNA analysis after curative intent surgery over and above current standard of care clinicopathological criteria. This ability of ctDNA analysis to stratify patients into low- and very-high-risk groups provides a window of opportunity to personalise adjuvant treatment where escalation/de-escalation of adjuvant systemic therapy could potentially increase cure rates and also reduce treatment-related physical and financial toxicity. Emerging data suggest that conversion of ctDNA from detectable to undetectable after adjuvant chemotherapy may reflect treatment efficacy. This real-time assessment of treatment benefit could be used as a surrogate endpoint for adjuvant novel drug development. Several ctDNA-based randomized adjuvant trials are ongoing internationally to confirm the clinical utility of ctDNA in colorectal cancer.

Implementing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: challenges and future perspectives

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are valuable therapeutics in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, in combination with chemotherapy are effective treatment options for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Nevertheless, several issues are still open concerning the optimal use of anti-EGFR drugs in the continuum of care of mCRC. Novel approaches for increasing the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies include better molecular selection of EGFR-dependent mCRC, intensification of chemotherapy, combination of anti-EGFR MoAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and reintroduction of EGFR blockade or 'rechallenge' in selected patients who have previously responded to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy. An extensive translational research program was conducted in the Cetuximab After Progression in KRAS wIld-type colorectal cancer patients-Gruppo Oncologico dell' Italia Meridionale (CAPRI-GOIM) study with the aims of determining which subgroups of patients could benefit from the continuous inhibition of EGFR, from evaluating the role of liquid biopsy-based and its concordance with tissue-based molecular testing, and from investigating novel potential mechanisms of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. In this review, we summarize the translational and clinical findings of the CAPRI-GOIM program in the context of the current knowledge of therapeutic strategies and of ongoing research on more appropriate uses of anti-EGFR therapies in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients.

Redefining Colorectal Cancer by Tumor Biology

Colorectal cancer treatment has undergone a paradigm shift. We no longer see this disease as a singular, anatomic tumor type but rather a set of disease subgroups. Largely because of a better understanding of cancer biology and the introduction and integration of molecular biomarkers-the premise of precision therapy-we are beginning to direct treatments toward the right tumor target(s) in the right patients. The field of molecular profiling is continually evolving, and new biomarkers are constantly being discovered that have investigational, therapeutic, and/or prognostic implications-negative or positive. To date, only a few biomarkers have sufficient actionable, clinical implication to earn international guideline-recommended routine testing. Hence, it is vital that the treating oncologist should know which biomarkers to assess, when in the treatment course to test for them, and how the test is to be done. Correct interpretation of profiling results is imperative. Herein, we focus on international guideline-recommended mutation testing for patients prior to their colorectal cancer treatment initiation. The clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with metastatic disease, based on our current knowledge and capabilities, are also addressed.

Role of circulating free DNA in evaluating clinical tumor burden and predicting survival in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the utility of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in the evaluation of clinical tumor burden and survival in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to preliminarily summarize some metastatic characteristics associated with mutational status.

Methods

A panel covering a total of 197 hotspot mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA was used to evaluate the mutational status in plasma by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in 126 patients with mCRC. An amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS) was used to analyze genomic DNA from matched tissue samples. Clinical markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in serum and the sum of all tumor diameters on CT or PET/CT were collected to indicate clinical tumor burden. The correlations between cfDNA and clinical tumor burden were analyzed using Pearson correlation and linear regression models. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis.

Results

Of the 126 enrolled patients, patients who were tested positive for mutations in plasma accounted for 45.2% (57/126). Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were detected in 37.3% (47/126), 1.6% (2/126), 3.2% (4/126) and 13.5% (17/126) of patients, respectively. The overall concordance rate of mutational status between plasma and matched tissues was 78.6% (99/126). Sixteen patients had mutations in plasma that were not detected in tissue, including some rare hotspot mutations. The cfDNA concentration was significantly correlated with the levels of clinical markers, especially CEA (P < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.81), LDH (P < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.84) and the sum of tumor diameters (P < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.80). Patients with a high cfDNA concentration (> 17.91 ng/ml) had shorter median progression-free survival (6.6 versus 11.7 months, P < 0.0001) and lower 1-year overall survival rate (56% versus 94%, P < 0.0001) than those with a low cfDNA concentration (≤17.91 ng/ml). The most common metastatic site was the liver (77.8%), followed by the lymph nodes (62.7%), lung (40.5%), peritoneum (14.3%) and bone (10.3%), in all patients. There was no significant difference in metastasis between different mutational statuses.

Conclusion

Analyzing mutations in plasma could provide a more comprehensive overview of the mutational landscape than analyzing mutations in tissue. The cfDNA concentration could be a quantitative biomarker of tumor burden and could predict survival in Chinese patients with mCRC.

Liquid Biopsy as a Tool Exploring in Real-Time Both Genomic Perturbation and Resistance to EGFR Antagonists in Colorectal Cancer

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved since the introduction of the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, only patients with peculiar genomic profiles benefit from these targeting therapies. In fact, the molecular integrity of RAS genes is a predominant factor conditioning both primary and acquired resistance in non-responders although additional molecular derangements induced by selective anti-EGFR pressure may concur to the failure of those disease treatment, liquid biopsy (LB) appears as a surrogate of tissue biopsy, provides the genomic information to reveal tumor resistance to anti-EGFR agents, the detection of minimal residual disease before adjuvant therapies, and the discovery of tumor molecular status suitable for rechallenging treatments with EGFR antagonists. LB investigates circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA), and tumor-derived exosomes. In mCRC, ctDNA analysis has been demonstrated as a useful method in the mutational tracking of defined genes as well as on tumor burden and detection of molecular alterations driving the resistance to anti-EGFR targeting treatments. However, despite their efficiency in molecular diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of mCRC, the affordability of these procedures is prevalently restricted to research centers, and the lack of consensus validation prevents their translation to clinical practice. Here, we revisit the major mechanisms responsible for resistance to EGFR blockade and review the different methods of LB potentially useful for treatment options in mCRC.