1
|
Arias-Martinez A, Martínez de Castro E, Gallego J, Arrazubi V, Custodio A, Fernández Montes A, Diez M, Hernandez R, Limón ML, Cano JM, Vidal-Tocino R, Macias I, Visa L, Martin Richard M, Sauri T, Hierro C, Gil M, Cerda P, Martínez Moreno E, Martínez Lago N, Mérida-García AJ, Gómez González L, García Navalón FJ, Ruiz Martín M, Marín G, López-López F, Ruperez Blanco AB, Fernández AF, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Alvarez-Manceñido F. Is there a preferred platinum and fluoropyrimidine regimen for advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma? Insights from 1293 patients in AGAMENON-SEOM registry. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03388-6. [PMID: 38361134 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03388-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal chemotherapy backbone for HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric cancer, either in combination with targeted therapies or as a comparator in clinical trials, is uncertain. The subtle yet crucial differences in platinum-based regimens' safety and synergy with combination treatments need consideration. METHODS We analyzed cases from the AGAMENON-SEOM Spanish registry of HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with platinum and fluoropyrimidine from 2008 to 2021. This study focused exclusively on patients receiving one of the four regimens: FOLFOX (5-FU and oxaliplatin), CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), CP (capecitabine and cisplatin) and FP (5-FU and cisplatin). The aim was to determine the most effective and tolerable platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen and to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS Among 1293 patients, 36% received either FOLFOX (n = 468) or CAPOX (n = 466), 20% CP (n = 252), and 8% FP (n = 107). FOLFOX significantly increased PFS (progression free survival) compared to CP, with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.92, p = 0.009). The duration of treatment was similar across all groups. Survival outcomes among regimens were similar, but analysis revealed worse ECOG-PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status), > 2 metastatic sites, bone metastases, hypoalbuminemia, higher NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and CP regimen as predictors of poor PFS. Fatigue was common in all treatments, with the highest incidence in FOLFOX (77%), followed by FP (72%), CAPOX (68%), and CP (60%). Other notable toxicities included neuropathy (FOLFOX 69%, CAPOX 62%), neutropenia (FOLFOX 52%, FP 55%), hand-foot syndrome in CP (46%), and thromboembolic events (FP 12%, CP 11%). CONCLUSIONS FOLFOX shown better PFS than CP. Adverse effects varied: neuropathy was more common with oxaliplatin, while thromboembolism was more frequent with cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aranzazu Arias-Martinez
- Doctoral Program in Pharmacy, Universidad de Granada, Barrio Verxeles n°13 2°, CP 27850, Granada, Viveiro, Spain.
| | - Eva Martínez de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Javier Gallego
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Custodio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, CB16/12/00398, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Orense, Orense, Spain
| | - Marc Diez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, VHIO, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Hernandez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
| | - María Luisa Limón
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Juana María Cano
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal-Tocino
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ismael Macias
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Laura Visa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario El Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Martin Richard
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tamara Sauri
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cinta Hierro
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO)-Badalona, Barcelona; Badalona-Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Mireia Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia-Ciberonc CB16/12/0035, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Cerda
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elia Martínez Moreno
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nieves Martínez Lago
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Spain
| | | | - Lucía Gómez González
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Maribel Ruiz Martín
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Palencia, Spain
| | - Gema Marín
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Flora López-López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valladares-Ayerbes M, Garcia-Alfonso P, Muñoz Luengo J, Pimentel Caceres PP, Castillo Trujillo OA, Vidal-Tocino R, Llanos M, Llorente Ayala B, Limon Miron ML, Salud A, Cirera Nogueras L, Garcia-Carbonero R, Safont MJ, Falco Ferrer E, Aparicio J, Vicente Conesa MA, Guillén-Ponce C, Garcia-Teijido P, Medina Magan MB, Busquier I, Salgado M, Lloansí Vila A. Evolution of RAS Mutations in Cell-Free DNA of Patients with Tissue RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-Line Treatment: The PERSEIDA Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:6075. [PMID: 36551560 PMCID: PMC9776941 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The serial analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution, providing continuous genetic information. PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing the cfDNA RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status evolution in first-line, metastatic CRC, RAS wild-type (according to baseline tumor tissue biopsy) patients. Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. One hundred and nineteen patients were included (102 received panitumumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment-panitumumab subpopulation). Fifteen (12.6%) patients presented baseline cfDNA RAS mutations (n = 14 [13.7%], panitumumab subpopulation) (mutant allele fraction ≥0.02 for all results). No patients presented emergent mutations (cfDNA RAS mutations not present at baseline) at 20 weeks. At disease progression, 11 patients (n = 9; panitumumab subpopulation) presented emergent mutations (RAS conversion rate: 19.0% [11/58]; 17.7% [9/51], panitumumab subpopulation). In contrast, three (5.2%) patients presenting baseline cfDNA RAS mutations were RAS wild-type at disease progression. No significant associations were observed between overall response rate or progression-free survival and cfDNA RAS mutational status in the total panitumumab subpopulation. Although, in patients with left-sided tumors, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed in cfDNA RAS wild-type patients compared to those presenting cfDNA RAS mutations at any time. Continuous evaluation of RAS mutations may provide valuable insights on tumor molecular dynamics that can help clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marta Llanos
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonieta Salud
- Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Jorge Aparicio
- Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 València, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Isabel Busquier
- Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, 12002 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|